DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Proposals for Unitary Local Government in Norfolk and Suffolk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Proposals for Unitary Local Government in Norfolk and Suffolk Draft proposals Draft proposals for unitary local government in Norfolk and Suffolk July 2008 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Boundary Committee: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] © The Boundary Committee 2008 The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G Contents What is the Boundary Committee for England? Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 The Committee’s approach 5 Engagement with stakeholders 5 General considerations: the context of modern local government 6 Specific considerations: how we have approached the review 9 Broad cross-section of support 15 Leadership 15 Deliver the empowerment of citizens and communities 17 Value-for-money services 18 Affordability 21 3 Concepts submitted to the Committee 23 Norfolk 23 Suffolk 29 4 Great Yarmouth and Waveney 35 5 Draft proposal for Norfolk 39 Other patterns 44 6 Draft proposal for Suffolk 51 Other pattern 60 7 What happens next? 63 Appendices Appendix A – Other considerations 65 Appendix B – Mapping 67 What is the Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by the UK Parliament. The Committee’s main role is to conduct electoral reviews of local authorities in England with the aim of ensuring the number of electors represented by each councillor is approximately the same. Other duties include reviewing local authority boundaries and advising the Government on local authority bids for unitary status. Members of the Committee are: Max Caller CBE (Chair) Jane Earl Robin Gray Professor Ron Johnston Joan Jones CBE Dr Peter Knight CBE DL Professor Colin Mellors Director: Archie Gall Summary On 6 February 2008 we were requested to advise the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government on alternative unitary structures of local government in Norfolk and Suffolk. This request for advice followed bids for unitary status from Norwich City Council and Ipswich Borough Council. On 7 July 2008 we published our draft proposals, on which comments are invited. Our draft proposal for Norfolk is: • a Norfolk unitary authority comprising the existing county of Norfolk and the Lowestoft area of Suffolk Our draft proposal for Suffolk is: • an Ipswich & Felixstowe unitary authority and a Suffolk unitary authority comprising the rest of the county apart from the Lowestoft area Our proposal for Norfolk is set out in detail in chapter 5 of the report and for Suffolk in chapter 6. Maps illustrating our draft proposals are set out in Appendix B of the report. Our approach to this review, and the general and specific considerations we have had regard to in conducting our work, are set out in chapter 2 of the report. What happens next? There will now be a period of 12 weeks, during which we welcome views on our draft proposals. All representations should be sent to reach us by 26 September 2008. We have not finalised our proposals for unitary patterns of local government in Norfolk and Suffolk. In the light of representations received, we will review our draft proposals and consider whether they should be altered. It is therefore important that all interested parties let us have their views and evidence, whether or not they agree with our draft proposals. We have also included in the report other patterns of unitary local government that we considered had merit, which people may wish to bear in mind when considering the draft proposals. In Norfolk we considered: • a Norwich, Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft unitary authority and a Norfolk unitary authority comprising the rest of the county 1 • a Norwich unitary authority on expanded boundaries and a Norfolk unitary authority comprising the rest of the county and the Lowestoft area of Suffolk In Suffolk we considered: • a Suffolk unitary authority comprising the existing county apart from the Lowestoft area We welcome views and evidence from all those who have previously written to us and those we have not yet heard from. The Committee places great importance on ensuring openness and transparency in the way we deal with all representations. Accordingly, representations received will be made available for public inspection at our offices in Trevelyan House. Submissions will also be available on our website, www.boundarycommittee.org.uk If you make comments during this period of the review, and do not want all or any part of your response or name made public, please state this clearly in the response. Any such request should explain why confidentiality is necessary, but all information in responses may be subject to publication or disclosure as required by law. After 26 September 2008 we will consider all the representations we have received and start to formulate our final advice, which we have been asked to submit to the Secretary of State by 31 December 2008. You can express your views by using our online form at www.boundarycommittee.org.uk, or by writing directly to: Review Manager (Norfolk and Suffolk Reviews) The Boundary Committee for England Trevelyan House Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW Tel: 020 7271 0512 Fax: 020 7271 0505 Email: [email protected] Once we have provided our advice there will then be a further period of four weeks during which representations may be made directly to the Secretary of State. She may then accept, reject or modify any proposal that we make. She may also ask us for more information. It will be for the Secretary of State to decide if and when any new unitary authorities are to be created. 2 Introduction 1.1 In October 2006, following the publication of the Local Government White Paper,1 the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government issued an invitation to two-tier principal local authorities (district and county councils) in England to submit to her proposals for a change to unitary or single-tier status.2 Local authorities bidding for unitary status were asked to submit business cases that addressed the five criteria set out in the invitation document. 1.2 Proposals were received for the creation of 26 new unitary authorities and included a bid from Ipswich Borough Council (Ipswich) and Norwich City Council (Norwich) for unitary status on their existing boundaries. In July 2007 the Secretary of State announced that in her judgement there was not a reasonable likelihood of Norwich’s proposal, based on the city’s current boundaries, if implemented, achieving all the outcomes specified by the five criteria. In December 2007 the Secretary of State made a similar announcement in relation to Ipswich’s bid. 1.3 We have been asked by the Secretary of State under section 4 of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 to provide advice3 on whether there could be alternative proposals for a single-tier of local government for each of Ipswich and Norwich, and the whole or part of the surrounding Suffolk and Norfolk county areas respectively, that would have the capacity, if implemented, to meet the five criteria set out by the Secretary of State in her October 2006 invitation. 1.4 In relation to Suffolk, we are also asked to consider whether there is an alternative unitary proposal that might involve all or part of the district of Great Yarmouth in Norfolk. Similarly, in relation to Norfolk, we are asked whether there is an alternative unitary pattern that might involve all or part of Waveney District in Suffolk. 1.5 If having identified that there are alternative unitary proposals that would deliver the outcomes specified by the five criteria, the Secretary of State has asked us to identify which would better deliver the outcomes specified by the criteria. 1.6 There are a number of other, more general, considerations to which we are required to have regard in our work. These are set out in Appendix A. 1.7 The review is in four stages (Table 1). Stage One began on 3 March 2008, when we wrote to all the local authorities in Norfolk and Suffolk, inviting them to submit to us broad concepts for unitary structures for the county. The 1 Strong and Prosperous Communities (Cm 6939-1, October 2006) 2 Invitation to Councils (Communities and Local Government, October 2006) 3 Request to the Boundary Committee to advise (Communities and Local Government, 6 February 2008) – www.boundarycommittee.org.uk 3 term ‘concepts’ is discussed in more detail in the following chapter of this report. The closing date for the receipt of concepts was 11 April 2008. Table 1: The stages of the review Stage Dates Description One 3 March – 11 April Commencement of review and submission of concepts for unitary patterns of local government Two 14 April – 4 July The Committee considers concepts, seeks further information and prepares draft proposals Three 7 July – 26 The Committee publishes draft proposals September report and invites representations on them Four 29 September – 31 The Committee considers representations, December reaches conclusions and submits advice to the Secretary of State 1.8 Once we have submitted our advice at the end of the review there will be a further four-week period, during which time representations on the advice we have provided can be made direct to the Secretary of State. In the light of any such representations, the Secretary of State may accept, reject or modify our final proposals, or ask us for further information about them and then take a decision.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transport Strategy Consultation
    If your school is in any of these Parishes then please read the letter below. Acle Fritton And St Olaves Raveningham Aldeby Geldeston Reedham Ashby With Oby Gillingham Repps With Bastwick Ashmanhaugh Haddiscoe Rockland St Mary Barton Turf Hales Rollesby Beighton Halvergate Salhouse Belaugh Heckingham Sea Palling Belton Hemsby Smallburgh Broome Hickling Somerton Brumstead Honing South Walsham Burgh Castle Horning Stalham Burgh St Peter Horsey Stockton Cantley Horstead With Stanninghall Stokesby With Herringby Carleton St Peter Hoveton Strumpshaw Catfield Ingham Sutton Chedgrave Kirby Cane Thurlton Claxton Langley With Hardley Thurne Coltishall Lingwood And Burlingham Toft Monks Crostwick Loddon Tunstead Dilham Ludham Upton With Fishley Ditchingham Martham West Caister Earsham Mautby Wheatacre East Ruston Neatishead Winterton-On-Sea Ellingham Norton Subcourse Woodbastwick Filby Ormesby St Margaret With Scratby Wroxham Fleggburgh Ormesby St Michael Potter Heigham Freethorpe Broads Area Transport Strategy Consultation Norfolk County Council is currently carrying out consultation on transport-related problems and issues around the Broads with a view to developing a transportation strategy for the Broads area. A consultation report and questionnaire has been produced and three workshops have been organised to discuss issues in more detail. The aim of this consultation exercise is to ensure that all the transport-related problems and issues have been considered, and priority areas for action have been identified. If you would like a copy of the consultation material or further details about the workshops please contact Natalie Beal on 01603 224200 (or mailto:[email protected] ). The consultation closes on 20 August 2004. Workshops Date Venue Time Tuesday 27 July Acle Recreation Centre 6 – 8pm Thursday 29 July Hobart High School, Loddon 6 - 8pm Wednesday 4 August Stalham High School, Stalham 2 - 4pm .
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable / Developable Housing Commitments in Broadland 1 April 2017 NPA
    Deliverable / Developable Housing Commitments in Broadland 1 April 2017 NPA Net Parish Address Ref Homes 2016/17 Blofield Land off Wyngates 20130296 49 Blofield Land off Blofield Corner Road 20162199 36 Blofield Land East of Plantation Road 20141044 14 Blofield Land Adj. 20 Yarmouth Road 20141710 30 Land South of Yarmouth Road and North Blofield 20150700 73 of Lingwood Road Land South of Yarmouth Road and North Blofield 20150794 30 of Lingwood Road, Phase II Former Piggeries, Manor Farm, Yarmouth Blofield 20150262 13 Road Blofield Land at Yarmouth Road 20160488 175 Vauxhall Mallards & Land Rear of Hillside, Brundall 20141816 21 Strumpshaw Road Drayton Land Adj. Hall Lane 20130885 250 Drayton Land East of School Road DRA 2 20 Land to the North East Side of Church Great and Little Plumstead 20161151 11 Road Great and Little Plumstead Land at Former Little Plumstead Hospital 20160808 109 Hellesdon C T D Tile House, Eversley Road 20152077 65 Land at Hospital Grounds, southwest of Hellesdon HEL1 300 Drayton Road Hellesdon Royal Norwich Golf Course 20151770 1,000 Horsford Land at Sharps Hall Farm 20130547 7 Horsford Land to the East of Holt Road,Horsford 20161770 259 Horsham & Newton St Faiths Land East of Manor Road HNF1 60 Old Catton 11 Dixons Fold 20160257 15 Old Catton Repton House 20151733 7 Salhouse Land Adj. 24 Norwich Road 20141505 2 Thorpe St. Andrew Pinebanks 20160425 231 Thorpe St. Andrew Land at Griffin Lane 20160423 71 Oasis Sport and Leisure Centre, 4 Pound Thorpe St. Andrew 20151132 27 Lane Thorpe St. Andrew 27 Yarmouth Road 20161542 25 Thorpe St.
    [Show full text]
  • Lingwood and Burlingham CP
    GNLP0384 South Walsham GNLP1048 Hemblington Upton with Fishley GNLP1049 GNLP0099 GNLP0378 GNLP1022 GNLP0427 Blofield GNLP0417 Acle GNLP0508 GNLP0421 GNLP0571 GNLP0450 GNLP0082 GNLP0252 GNLP0254 GNLP0499 Lingwood and Burlingham GNLP0379 GNLP0067 GNLP0436 GNLP0380 GNLP0352 Brundall GNLP0277 GNLP0296 GNLP0090 GNLP0215 Beighton GNLP0521 Strumpshaw GNLP0449 Norwich © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100019340 Surlingham Cantley, Limpenhoe and Southwood Lingwood and Burlingham CP Date created: Greater Norwich Local Plan 22-12-2017 Regulation 18 Consultation Call for Sites Settlement Boundaries GN Strategic Employment Sites 1:28,350 Parish Boundary Commitments Broads Authority Area This map was made by the Norfolk County Council Information Exploitation Team [email protected] @ A4 ± L I N G W O O D L A N E OAD ACLE R GNLP0499 Lingwood and Burlingham S OU TH B UR LI NG H A M R O A D AD RO E DG LO GNLP0067 20150754 © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100019340 Date created: Greater Norwich Local Plan Settlement Boundaries GN Strategic Employment Sites 22-12-2017 Regulation 18 Consultation GNLP0499 Call for Sites Commitments scale: 1:2,000 Parish Boundary Broads Authority Area This map was made by the Norfolk County Council Information Exploitation Team [email protected] ± @A4 GNLP0499 AD RO E DG LO 20150754 GNLP0067 Lingwood and Burlingham O AK TR E E C L O S S O E U T H B U R L I N G H A M E R L O M A D R O A D © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100019340 Date created: Greater
    [Show full text]
  • CPRE Norfolk Housing Allocation Pledge Signatures – Correct As of 24 March 2021 South Norfolk Alburgh Ashby St Mary Barford &A
    CPRE Norfolk Housing Allocation Pledge Signatures – correct as of 24 March 2021 South Norfolk Alburgh Ashby St Mary Barford & Wramplingham Barnham Broom Bawburgh Bergh Apton Bracon Ash and Hethel Brockdish Broome Colney Costessey Cringleford Dickleburgh and Rushall Diss Framingham Pigot Forncett Gissing Great Melton Hempnall Hethersett Hingham Keswick and Intwood Kirby Cane and Ellingham Langley with Hardley Marlingford and Colton Mulbarton Rockland St Mary with Hellington Saxlingham Nethergate Scole Shelfanger Shelton and Hardwick Shotesham Stockton Surlingham Thurlton Thurton Thwaite St Mary Tivetshall St Margaret Tivetshall St Mary Trowse with Newton Winfarthing Wreningham Broadland Acle Attlebridge Beighton Blofield Brandiston Buxton with Lamas Cantley, Limpenhoe and Southwood Coltishall Drayton Felthorpe Frettenham Great Witchingham Hainford Hemblington Hevingham Honingham Horsford Horsham St Faiths Lingwood and Burlingham Reedham Reepham Ringland Salhouse Stratton Strawless Strumpshaw Swannington with Alderford and Little Witchingham Upton with Fishley Weston Longville Wood Dalling Woodbastwick Total = 72 Total parishes in Broadland & South Norfolk = 181 % signed = 39.8% Breckland Ashill Banham Bintree Carbrooke Caston Colkirk Cranworth East Tuddenham Foulden Garveston, Reymerston & Thuxton Gooderstone Great Ellingham Harling Hockering Lyng Merton Mundford North Tuddenham Ovington Rocklands Roudham & Larling Saham Toney Scoulton Stow Bedon & Breckles Swaffham Weeting with Broomhill Whinburgh & Westfield Wretham Yaxham Great Yarmouth
    [Show full text]
  • Acle Burlingham Marshes Newsletter June 2020
    Newsletter Welcome to the newsletter for Acle, Beighton, Freethorpe, Halvergate, Reedham, Lingwood and Burlingham. Date: June 2020 Message from T/Inspector David Taylor “Welcome to this month’s newsletter. My team have been very proactive over the past 3 months in their policing, targeting vulnerable premises and focussing on disruption of persons believed involved in criminality. Common with all policing areas we are receiving sporadic reports relating to ASB and drug use which has led to Hi-visibility patrols and stop searches, thereby disrupting such behaviour. In the event you witness any ASB or suspicious behaviour please contact us either by dialling 101 or if an emergency 999 or you want to remain anonymous you can contact Crimestoppers on Local Policing 0800 555111” Commander – Sprowston, Thorpe St Andrew & Acle Crime Updates March, April, May 2020 Offence March April May What could this entail Arson 1 0 0 Damage caused as a result of fire. Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB) 0 0 1 Harassment, alarm or distress is caused in a non-crime incident. Burglary Business and Community 0 0 0 A person commits theft in a building or structure that is not lived in. Burglary Residential 2 1 1 Entry and theft in a building or a structure that is lived in. Criminal Damage 3 4 1 A person destroys or damages property belonging to someone else. Domestic 2 3 2 Domestic incidents where a crime has not occurred. Parties are aged 16 or over and have been intimate partners or family members regardless of sexuality. Hate Incident 0 0 0 Any incident where a crime has not occurred which the victim, or anyone else, thinks is based on someone’s prejudice towards them because of their race, religion, sexual orientation, disability or be- cause they are transgender.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues & Options
    Issues & Options: Report of Consultation Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk Public Consultation, 19 November 2007 – 8 February 2008 Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 5 2. Consultation methods used 6 3. Issues & Options Full Report 9 Results Analysis 4. Analysis of Responses by Policy Theme 11 Policies for Places 5. Analysis of Responses by Policy Theme 24 Area-Wide Policies 6. Implementation and Monitoring 34 Responses to Consultation Appendices Appendix 1: Joint Core Strategy Issues Workshops 2007 36 Appendix 2: Joint Core Strategy ‘Issues & Options’ 38 stakeholder meetings and presentations Appendix 3: Exhibition attendance figures 40 Appendix 4: ‘Have Your Say’ Youth Conference 7 February 2008 44 ‘Saying it Better’ workshop report Appendix 5: Young peoples’ questionnaire 51 Appendix 6: Results Analysis of Issues & Options Summary Leaflet 53 Monitoring information & representativeness of respondents Appendix 7: Analysis of Responses on Full Questionnaire 68 Appendix 8: Local Survey of Long Stratton Residents 97 Executive summary 1 Executive summary Sustainable Development ‘secondary rural settlements’ – notably public transport access to work, a village hall, a Respondents gave broad support to the convenience store and a primary school. statements of Vision and Objectives in the report. Comments made it clear that, in There was general agreement that development general, respondents considered these to outside the hierarchy of settlements should be of a quality of life that they would want. be strictly controlled. However, some people wanted to see an exception to allow for Respondents expressed concern about the development to support settlements with acceptance of housing growth, the need to focus a limited range of existing services.
    [Show full text]
  • NORFOLK Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a photograph NORFOLK Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road Parish Location Position NO_BLGU01 TG 18733 28905 BLICKLING By Keepers Cottage against garden fence, E side of track NO_BLHO01 TG 1648 2046 B1354 BLICKLING 200yds W of NO/023 in wood 2 yds from edge of Rd NO_CH08 TG 10116 39761 A148 HIGH KELLING 30yds E of jct with SelBrigg Rd on the verge NO_CH09 TG 08626 39132 HOLT N corner of jct with Laurel Drive rear of pavement against hedge NO_DME1 TF 61197 02531 B1507 DOWNHAM MARKET London Rd, 18yds S of Ryston Close in pavement NO_DME2 TF 6179 0130 (was A10) DENVER Bates Wood, Whin Common on verge NO_DME3 TL 61661 99655 (was A10) FORDHAM opp. church on the verge NO_DME4 TL 62086 98399 (was A10) HILGAY 15yds S of Stocks Hill in pavement against Brick wall NO_DME5 TL 6154 9692 A10 HILGAY 60yds N of jUnction with Modney Bridge Rd on the verge NO_DME6 TL 61890 94539 B1160 SOUTHERY Westgate Street, By No. 35 in hedge NO_DMS5 TF 68369 06368 A1122 FINCHAM By JUBilee HoUse in pavement NO_DMW3 TF 57322 01276 A1122 DOWNHAM MARKET 80yds W of Kontel Kennels on the verge NO_DMW4 TF 55754 01007 A1122 NORDELPH opp. jct with B1094, oUtside "Threeways" on the verge NO_DMW6 TF 53197 02858 A1122 OUTWELL jUst W of entrance to MullicoUrt Priory Farm on narrow verge NO_FADE09 TF 96941 17728 B1146 BEETLEY Fakenham Rd, By "Milestone HoUse", No. 78 on the verge NO_Fel1L TG 19377 39396 pivate path FELBRIGG FelBrigg Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • ETD General Template
    Community and Environmental Services County Hall Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2SG Philip Baum NCC contact number: 0344 800 8020 Broadland District Council Text Relay - 18001 0344 800 8020 Thorpe Lodge 1 Yarmouth Road Thorpe St Andrew Norwich NR7 0DU Your Ref: 20200724 My Ref: 9/5/20/0724 Date: 5 May 2020 Tel No.: 01603 638070 Email: [email protected] Dear Philip Lingwood & Burlingham: Change of use of part of dwelling house to form a single dwelling The Station House,26 Station Road, Lingwood and Burlingham, NR13 4AZ Thank you for your recent consultation with respect to the above. There is some restriction to the visibility to the north of the the junction of the access road with the main highway (northern side) as a result of overgrowth from the boundary hedge and boundary fence/fence post. Whilst the cutting back/maintenance of the hedge, which is currently over growing the highway, would provide some improvement to visibility, this is to the non-critical traffic direction and a minor relaxation in standard is considered acceptable in this location. Furthermore, notwithstanding the increase in traffic movements that would result from this application, if approved, on balance I do not consider I could sustain an objection on visibility grounds alone. I note that the proposal state that parking will be provided, but no specific details of existing and proposed parking provision are supplied. Present parking provision, which is in not delineated in any way, is clearly shared between the needs of the existing property and that of the railway. Whilst the access road is outside the jurisdiction of the highway authority, there will undoubtedly be increased parking demand on the access road and possibly resulting restricted turning provision also; however, I do not consider increased demand would lead to displaced parking on the highway and is more likely to give rise to social issues.
    [Show full text]
  • UNREASONABLE SITES - RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE CLUSTERS – Broadland
    UNREASONABLE SITES - RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE CLUSTERS – Broadland Address Site Reference Area Promoted for Reason considered to be (ha) unreasonable Blofield Heath Blofield Nurseries, Hall GNLP0099 2.85 Up to 25 This site is considered to Road dwellings be unreasonable for allocation as it is located some way beyond the built edge of the village with no safe pedestrian route to Hemblington Primary School. Development of this site would not be well related to the form and character of the settlement. Land to the west of GNLP0288 1.43 24 dwellings This site is considered to Woodbastwick Road be unreasonable for allocation as the planning history suggests there are access constraints which means that the site would only be suitable for small scale development off a private drive. It therefore would not be able to accommodate the minimum allocation size of 12-15 dwellings. Land east of Park GNLP0300 0.78 Residential Although this site is Lane (unspecified adjacent to the existing number) settlement limit it is considered to be unreasonable for allocation as there is no continuous footway to Hemblington Primary School. There is a better located site to meet the capacity of the cluster. Dawson’s Lane GNLP2080 2.65 42 dwellings Although this site is adjacent to the existing settlement limit it is considered to be unreasonable for allocation as there is no continuous footway to Hemblington Primary School. There is a better located site to meet the capacity of the cluster. In addition, the proposed access to the site is Address Site Reference Area Promoted for Reason considered to be (ha) unreasonable currently a narrow track with an unmade surface which would need upgrading to be acceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • Lingwood and Burlingham Waiting Restrictions
    THE NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL (LINGWOOD AND STRUMPSHAW, VARIOUS ROADS) (PROHIBITION OF WAITING) CONSOLIDATION AND VARIATION ORDER 2011 The Norfolk County Council (hereinafter referred to as “the Council”) in exercise of their powers under Sections 1(1), 2(1), 2(2) and 4(2) and 122 and Parts III and IV of Schedule 9 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and the Traffic Management Act 2004 (hereinafter referred to as “the 2004 Act”) and of all other enabling powers, and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of Schedule 9 to the Act hereby make the following Order:- 1. This Order shall come into operation on the 7th day of November 2011 and may be cited as The Norfolk County Council (Lingwood and Strumpshaw, Various Roads) (Prohibition of Waiting) Order 2011. 2. In this Order – Any reference to any enactment shall be construed as a reference to that enactment as amended, applied, consolidated, re-enacted by or as having effect by virtue of any subsequent enactment. Where the context otherwise requires the following expressions have the meaning hereby respectively assigned to them. "authorised taxi rank" means any area of carriageway which is comprised within and indicated by a road marking complying with diagram 1028.2 in Schedule 6 to the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002; "authorised parking place" means any parking place on a road authorised or designated by an order made or having effect as if made under the Act; “Civil Enforcement Officer” has the same meaning as in s76 of the 2004 Act; "Disabled Person's Badge" has the same meaning as in the Disabled Persons (Badges for Motor Vehicles)(England) Regulations 2000; and "Parking Disc" means a disc, issued by a local authority, complying with the requirements of the British Standard Specification for Parking Discs (BS No.
    [Show full text]
  • A47 Corridor Improvement Scheme Public Consultation Report A47 Blofield to North Burlingham
    A47 corridor improvement scheme Public consultation report A47 Blofield to North Burlingham Road Investment Strategy A47 Improvements Blofield to North Burlingham Report on Public Consultation August 2017 Date: 14 August 2017 Version: 1.2 1 The original format of this document is copyright to the Highways England 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Background 5 1.2 Purpose of non-Statutory Public Consultation 6 1.3 Purpose and Structure of Report on Public Consultation 6 1.4 A47 Blofield to North Burlingham 6 1.5 Scheme Objectives and Proposals 6 2 Proposals Presented for Public Consultation 8 2.1 Our Proposed Options 8 2.2 Proposed Option 1 8 2.3 Proposed Option 2 8 2.4 Proposed Option 3 9 2.5 Proposed Option 4 9 2.6 Alternative Options 10 3 Consultation Arrangements 11 3.1 Brochure and Questionnaire 11 3.2 Advertising 11 3.3 Public Information Exhibition 11 3.4 Display Material 12 3.5 Attendance at Exhibition 12 3.6 Additional material on display 13 3.7 Meetings with affected parties 13 4 Reporting Methodology 14 4.1 Data receipt and digitisation of all submissions 14 4.2 Analysis Process 16 4.3 Reporting 16 4.4 Quality Assurance 17 5 Quantitative Analysis 18 5.1 Types of road user 18 5.2 Frequency of travel through the A47 Blofield to North Burlingham route 18 5.3 Purpose of travel through the A47 Blofield to North Burlingham route 19 5.4 Proximity to the A47 Blofield to North Burlingham route 19 6 The Need for Improvements 20 6.1 Response to Question 12 20 6.2 Comments supporting the need for improvements 20 6.3 Comments opposing
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Statement of Accounts 2020-21
    Statement of Accounts 2020-21 Norfolk County Council Statement of Accounts 2020-21 Contents Narrative Report ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Statement of Responsibilities ................................................................................................................................... 18 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of Norfolk County Council .............................................................. 19 Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement ............................................................................................... 22 Movement in Reserves Statement ........................................................................................................................... 23 Balance Sheet .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 Cash Flow Statement ............................................................................................................................................... 25 Notes to the Financial Statements ........................................................................................................................... 26 Group Accounts ...................................................................................................................................................... 106 Group Comprehensive
    [Show full text]