DOCSLIB.ORG

Issues & Options

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Issues & Options Issues & Options: Report of Consultation Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk Public Consultation, 19 November 2007 – 8 February 2008 Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 5 2. Consultation methods used 6 3. Issues & Options Full Report 9 Results Analysis 4. Analysis of Responses by Policy Theme 11 Policies for Places 5. Analysis of Responses by Policy Theme 24 Area-Wide Policies 6. Implementation and Monitoring 34 Responses to Consultation Appendices Appendix 1: Joint Core Strategy Issues Workshops 2007 36 Appendix 2: Joint Core Strategy ‘Issues & Options’ 38 stakeholder meetings and presentations Appendix 3: Exhibition attendance figures 40 Appendix 4: ‘Have Your Say’ Youth Conference 7 February 2008 44 ‘Saying it Better’ workshop report Appendix 5: Young peoples’ questionnaire 51 Appendix 6: Results Analysis of Issues & Options Summary Leaflet 53 Monitoring information & representativeness of respondents Appendix 7: Analysis of Responses on Full Questionnaire 68 Appendix 8: Local Survey of Long Stratton Residents 97 Executive summary 1 Executive summary Sustainable Development ‘secondary rural settlements’ – notably public transport access to work, a village hall, a Respondents gave broad support to the convenience store and a primary school. statements of Vision and Objectives in the report. Comments made it clear that, in There was general agreement that development general, respondents considered these to outside the hierarchy of settlements should be of a quality of life that they would want. be strictly controlled. However, some people wanted to see an exception to allow for Respondents expressed concern about the development to support settlements with acceptance of housing growth, the need to focus a limited range of existing services. on maintaining and enhancing the sustainability of small rural settlements and the need for the Respondents supported the need to give vision to be more creative and locally distinctive. priority to brownfield site development, so far as possible. There was also some concern There was some priority given to the strategic about the impact of ‘urban sprawl’ and loss of principles of “infrastructure and service character on some areas surrounding Norwich. planning and delivery” and “environmental impact” as criteria for judging where and There was general agreement that public when growth is acceptable. transport and where feasible walking and cycling links need to be improved to give Respondents gave strong support to measures better access between rural areas and that ensure that new development is sustainable Key Service Centres, Market Towns etc. in terms of its energy efficiency and in relation to using renewable sources of energy. A suggested target of 20% of energy requirements was Locations for major growth and also supported. change in the NPA While a significant minority place equal Spatial Hierarchy importance on wide ranging criteria when a There was broad support for the definition of preference is expressed the 3 most important the spatial hierarchy as proposed in the Issues factors for locating growth are: easy access and Options document both in terms of the to facilities by walking, cycling and public broad hierarchy as a whole, and in relation transport; the ability of new and existing to the definition of Market Towns and Key infrastructure and transport to support growth; Service Centres in the settlement hierarchy. and minimising the impact on the environment. Respondents identified a number of facilities Respondents supported the option of large that can be used to define the next level of scale urban extensions and a possible new Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk • Issues and Options: Report of Consultation 2 Executive summary settlement by a small margin (34% to 31%) over Respondents supported focused employment a more dispersed pattern of growth. An option growth in the city centre, although the majority of an even larger scale of concentration in one accepted that some office jobs would need to new town south of Norwich was suggested in a be created outside this main focus. There was limited number of responses. also strong support for promoting brownfield development generally and providing for a mix Technical consultees and infrastructure of uses especially in the city centre. providers tend to favour concentration in larger scale developments. The development In several respects respondents recognised industry tends to support a combination across that new development needs to be appropriate all three options with elements of large scale, to the history and heritage of the city centre medium scale and smaller scale growth. and at appropriate densities. Different locations for development were There was considerable support for retail favoured in responses to the Long and growth to be concentrated in the existing retail Short Questionnaires although there is area and majority support for this to include the significant overlap between them. In the Short Anglia Square/Magdalen Street area, but little Questionnaire responses (taking account of all support for wider expansion of the retail area. expressed preferences) a majority were in favour of the South-west, South-east, Wymondham For leisure development respondents and North-east/East sectors. In the Long supported a strategy that would provide a Questionnaire responses the most favoured wider range of facilities for all age groups. individual locations were the North-east, South- There was significant concern about traffic west, and Wymondham and an overall strategy congestion and most respondents accepted for large scale growth to be focussed on these the need to improve public transport, cycling three locations, either solely or in combination and walking facilities, although respondents with one or more additional locations, received also wanted to maintain car access. majority support (53%). Whilst the Long Questionnaire gave results Suburbs and Fringe in favour of growth to provide a Long Stratton Respondents agreed with the overall approach bypass, the local survey (undertaken by South to development within Norwich and the urban Norfolk District Council) indicated that local area including the sequence of preferred sites people are evenly divided for and against such from the city centre to areas on the edge of a solution. Only a minority of local people the urban area where accessibility is poor. would support a development in excess of 1,500 dwellings. In relation to skills and training respondents supported a range of initiatives outlined in City Centre the document. Respondents gave broad support to the The responses generally accepted the need for proposed hierarchy of centres, which recognises more bus priority measures in the urban area, the city centre as the strategic centre for growth although the option selected suggested that and the economic driver for the sub-regional this could be done without loss of capacity for economy. The need for a range of city centre the private car. service functions beyond retailing was also Respondents supported the need to focus recognised, including facilities for education area-wide regeneration on specific areas and training, health and young people. where deprivation would be addressed. These included a number of deprived city areas. Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk • Issues and Options: Report of Consultation Executive summary 3 Definition of Norwich Policy Area that all sectors of the economy would have opportunities to expand. The majority of respondents support the current boundary of the NPA. The responses across several questions showed strong support for more ‘home working’ and for A small number suggested either enlarging mixed use solutions to employment growth. This or shrinking the boundary, to the south included the idea of live/work units and a more or south-west. flexible approach to issues relating to working at home. Town Centre Hierarchy Respondents supported a range of measures to Respondents gave overwhelming endorsement promote and encourage training and learning to the hierarchy of centres as defined in the opportunities related to the needs of business. Issues and Options document. Respondents also generally supported There were a few suggested changes with measures to assist small business growth some additional settlements suggested for and especially solutions related to residential inclusion, but no overriding support for any areas and mixed uses. particular one of these. Strategic Access and Transportation Housing Transport improvements are given a high Respondents expressed concerns that priority in the response for improving the local smaller settlements should be allowed environment and are among the highest sufficient growth to sustain their services criteria for selecting growth locations. and sense of community. Respondents favoured strategies to encourage On the other hand some people opposed the walking, cycling and public transport use in overall level of growth in housing numbers both the urban and rural areas and market being proposed. towns, while recognising that there are areas Respondents supported measures to extend where the private car is the only available and provision of affordable housing by reducing practical means of transport. threshold levels at which the policy is triggered To reduce the need to travel, the most popular and by widening the scope for private sector solutions included co-location of homes, projects
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transport Strategy Consultation
    If your school is in any of these Parishes then please read the letter below. Acle Fritton And St Olaves Raveningham Aldeby Geldeston Reedham Ashby With Oby Gillingham Repps With Bastwick Ashmanhaugh Haddiscoe Rockland St Mary Barton Turf Hales Rollesby Beighton Halvergate Salhouse Belaugh Heckingham Sea Palling Belton Hemsby Smallburgh Broome Hickling Somerton Brumstead Honing South Walsham Burgh Castle Horning Stalham Burgh St Peter Horsey Stockton Cantley Horstead With Stanninghall Stokesby With Herringby Carleton St Peter Hoveton Strumpshaw Catfield Ingham Sutton Chedgrave Kirby Cane Thurlton Claxton Langley With Hardley Thurne Coltishall Lingwood And Burlingham Toft Monks Crostwick Loddon Tunstead Dilham Ludham Upton With Fishley Ditchingham Martham West Caister Earsham Mautby Wheatacre East Ruston Neatishead Winterton-On-Sea Ellingham Norton Subcourse Woodbastwick Filby Ormesby St Margaret With Scratby Wroxham Fleggburgh Ormesby St Michael Potter Heigham Freethorpe Broads Area Transport Strategy Consultation Norfolk County Council is currently carrying out consultation on transport-related problems and issues around the Broads with a view to developing a transportation strategy for the Broads area. A consultation report and questionnaire has been produced and three workshops have been organised to discuss issues in more detail. The aim of this consultation exercise is to ensure that all the transport-related problems and issues have been considered, and priority areas for action have been identified. If you would like a copy of the consultation material or further details about the workshops please contact Natalie Beal on 01603 224200 (or mailto:[email protected] ). The consultation closes on 20 August 2004. Workshops Date Venue Time Tuesday 27 July Acle Recreation Centre 6 – 8pm Thursday 29 July Hobart High School, Loddon 6 - 8pm Wednesday 4 August Stalham High School, Stalham 2 - 4pm .
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable / Developable Housing Commitments in Broadland 1 April 2017 NPA
    Deliverable / Developable Housing Commitments in Broadland 1 April 2017 NPA Net Parish Address Ref Homes 2016/17 Blofield Land off Wyngates 20130296 49 Blofield Land off Blofield Corner Road 20162199 36 Blofield Land East of Plantation Road 20141044 14 Blofield Land Adj. 20 Yarmouth Road 20141710 30 Land South of Yarmouth Road and North Blofield 20150700 73 of Lingwood Road Land South of Yarmouth Road and North Blofield 20150794 30 of Lingwood Road, Phase II Former Piggeries, Manor Farm, Yarmouth Blofield 20150262 13 Road Blofield Land at Yarmouth Road 20160488 175 Vauxhall Mallards & Land Rear of Hillside, Brundall 20141816 21 Strumpshaw Road Drayton Land Adj. Hall Lane 20130885 250 Drayton Land East of School Road DRA 2 20 Land to the North East Side of Church Great and Little Plumstead 20161151 11 Road Great and Little Plumstead Land at Former Little Plumstead Hospital 20160808 109 Hellesdon C T D Tile House, Eversley Road 20152077 65 Land at Hospital Grounds, southwest of Hellesdon HEL1 300 Drayton Road Hellesdon Royal Norwich Golf Course 20151770 1,000 Horsford Land at Sharps Hall Farm 20130547 7 Horsford Land to the East of Holt Road,Horsford 20161770 259 Horsham & Newton St Faiths Land East of Manor Road HNF1 60 Old Catton 11 Dixons Fold 20160257 15 Old Catton Repton House 20151733 7 Salhouse Land Adj. 24 Norwich Road 20141505 2 Thorpe St. Andrew Pinebanks 20160425 231 Thorpe St. Andrew Land at Griffin Lane 20160423 71 Oasis Sport and Leisure Centre, 4 Pound Thorpe St. Andrew 20151132 27 Lane Thorpe St. Andrew 27 Yarmouth Road 20161542 25 Thorpe St.
    [Show full text]
  • Lingwood and Burlingham CP
    GNLP0384 South Walsham GNLP1048 Hemblington Upton with Fishley GNLP1049 GNLP0099 GNLP0378 GNLP1022 GNLP0427 Blofield GNLP0417 Acle GNLP0508 GNLP0421 GNLP0571 GNLP0450 GNLP0082 GNLP0252 GNLP0254 GNLP0499 Lingwood and Burlingham GNLP0379 GNLP0067 GNLP0436 GNLP0380 GNLP0352 Brundall GNLP0277 GNLP0296 GNLP0090 GNLP0215 Beighton GNLP0521 Strumpshaw GNLP0449 Norwich © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100019340 Surlingham Cantley, Limpenhoe and Southwood Lingwood and Burlingham CP Date created: Greater Norwich Local Plan 22-12-2017 Regulation 18 Consultation Call for Sites Settlement Boundaries GN Strategic Employment Sites 1:28,350 Parish Boundary Commitments Broads Authority Area This map was made by the Norfolk County Council Information Exploitation Team [email protected] @ A4 ± L I N G W O O D L A N E OAD ACLE R GNLP0499 Lingwood and Burlingham S OU TH B UR LI NG H A M R O A D AD RO E DG LO GNLP0067 20150754 © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100019340 Date created: Greater Norwich Local Plan Settlement Boundaries GN Strategic Employment Sites 22-12-2017 Regulation 18 Consultation GNLP0499 Call for Sites Commitments scale: 1:2,000 Parish Boundary Broads Authority Area This map was made by the Norfolk County Council Information Exploitation Team [email protected] ± @A4 GNLP0499 AD RO E DG LO 20150754 GNLP0067 Lingwood and Burlingham O AK TR E E C L O S S O E U T H B U R L I N G H A M E R L O M A D R O A D © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100019340 Date created: Greater
    [Show full text]
  • Breckland Local Plan Consultation Statement 1
    Region 1. Introduction 2 2. Issues and Options 3 3. Preferred Directions 5 4. Proposed Sites and Settlement 7 Boundaries 5. General and Specific Consultees 9 6. Conformity with the Statement of 16 Community Involvement Breckland Local Plan Consultation Statement 1 1 Introduction 1.1 This statement of consultation will be submitted to the Secretary of State as part of the examination of the Breckland Local Plan. The statement sets out the information required under Regulation 22 (c) of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012. This statement shows: Who was consulted; How they have been consulted; A summary of the issues raised How issues have been addressed within the Local Plan. 1.2 The 2012 Local Planning Regulations sets out the stages of consultation that a Local Plan is required to go through prior to its submission to the Secretary of State. These are: Regulation 18: a consultation whereby the local authority notifies of their intention to prepare a Local Plan and representations are invited about what the Local Plan should contain Regulation 19: prior to submitting the Local Plan to the Secretary of State, the proposed submission document is made available to the general consultation bodies and the specific consultation bodies. 1.3 In accordance with the regulations and Breckland's Statement of Community Involvement, the Local Plan has been subjected to a number of consultation periods. These are summarised below: Regulation 18: Issues and Options consultation Regulation 18: Preferred Directions consultation Regulation 18: Preferred Sites and Settlement Boundaries consultation 1.4 Full details of each of these consultations is included within this statement.
    [Show full text]
  • CPRE Norfolk Housing Allocation Pledge Signatures – Correct As of 24 March 2021 South Norfolk Alburgh Ashby St Mary Barford &A
    CPRE Norfolk Housing Allocation Pledge Signatures – correct as of 24 March 2021 South Norfolk Alburgh Ashby St Mary Barford & Wramplingham Barnham Broom Bawburgh Bergh Apton Bracon Ash and Hethel Brockdish Broome Colney Costessey Cringleford Dickleburgh and Rushall Diss Framingham Pigot Forncett Gissing Great Melton Hempnall Hethersett Hingham Keswick and Intwood Kirby Cane and Ellingham Langley with Hardley Marlingford and Colton Mulbarton Rockland St Mary with Hellington Saxlingham Nethergate Scole Shelfanger Shelton and Hardwick Shotesham Stockton Surlingham Thurlton Thurton Thwaite St Mary Tivetshall St Margaret Tivetshall St Mary Trowse with Newton Winfarthing Wreningham Broadland Acle Attlebridge Beighton Blofield Brandiston Buxton with Lamas Cantley, Limpenhoe and Southwood Coltishall Drayton Felthorpe Frettenham Great Witchingham Hainford Hemblington Hevingham Honingham Horsford Horsham St Faiths Lingwood and Burlingham Reedham Reepham Ringland Salhouse Stratton Strawless Strumpshaw Swannington with Alderford and Little Witchingham Upton with Fishley Weston Longville Wood Dalling Woodbastwick Total = 72 Total parishes in Broadland & South Norfolk = 181 % signed = 39.8% Breckland Ashill Banham Bintree Carbrooke Caston Colkirk Cranworth East Tuddenham Foulden Garveston, Reymerston & Thuxton Gooderstone Great Ellingham Harling Hockering Lyng Merton Mundford North Tuddenham Ovington Rocklands Roudham & Larling Saham Toney Scoulton Stow Bedon & Breckles Swaffham Weeting with Broomhill Whinburgh & Westfield Wretham Yaxham Great Yarmouth
    [Show full text]
  • Skidmore, Skitmore and Scudamore Families of Suffolk and Norfolk
    Skidmore, Skitmore and Scudamore of Suffolk and Norfolk Skidmore/ Scudamore One-Name Study SKIDMORE, SKITMORE AND SCUDAMORE FAMILIES OF SUFFOLK AND NORFOLK by Linda Moffatt ©2016 CITATION Please respect the author's contribution and state where you found this information if you quote it. Suggested citation 'Skidmore, Skitmore and Scudamore Families of Suffolk and Norfolk by Linda Moffatt at the website of the Skidmore/ Scudamore One-Name Study www.skidmorefamilyhistory.com'. Minor changes were made to this account by Linda Moffatt on 25 July 2017. DATES • Prior to 1752 the year began on 25 March (Lady Day). In order to avoid confusion, a date which in the modern calendar would be written 2 February 1714 is written 2 February 1713/4 - i.e. the baptism, marriage or burial occurred in the 3 months (January, February and the first 3 weeks of March) of 1713 which 'rolled over' into what in a modern calendar would be 1714. • Civil registration was introduced in England and Wales in 1837 and records were archived quarterly; hence, for example, 'born in 1840Q1' the author here uses to mean that the birth took place in January, February or March of 1840. For an individual born after 1837, where only a baptism date is given, assume the birth was registered in the same quarter but the exact date of birth is not presently known. BIRTHS, MARRIAGES AND DEATHS Databases of all known Skidmore and Scudamore bmds can be found at ww.skidmorefamilyhistory.com PROBATE A list of all known Skidmore and Scudamore wills - many with full transcription or an abstract of its contents - can be found at www.skidmorefamilyhistory.com in the file Skidmore/Scudamore One-Name Study Probate.
    [Show full text]
  • Acle Burlingham Marshes Newsletter June 2020
    Newsletter Welcome to the newsletter for Acle, Beighton, Freethorpe, Halvergate, Reedham, Lingwood and Burlingham. Date: June 2020 Message from T/Inspector David Taylor “Welcome to this month’s newsletter. My team have been very proactive over the past 3 months in their policing, targeting vulnerable premises and focussing on disruption of persons believed involved in criminality. Common with all policing areas we are receiving sporadic reports relating to ASB and drug use which has led to Hi-visibility patrols and stop searches, thereby disrupting such behaviour. In the event you witness any ASB or suspicious behaviour please contact us either by dialling 101 or if an emergency 999 or you want to remain anonymous you can contact Crimestoppers on Local Policing 0800 555111” Commander – Sprowston, Thorpe St Andrew & Acle Crime Updates March, April, May 2020 Offence March April May What could this entail Arson 1 0 0 Damage caused as a result of fire. Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB) 0 0 1 Harassment, alarm or distress is caused in a non-crime incident. Burglary Business and Community 0 0 0 A person commits theft in a building or structure that is not lived in. Burglary Residential 2 1 1 Entry and theft in a building or a structure that is lived in. Criminal Damage 3 4 1 A person destroys or damages property belonging to someone else. Domestic 2 3 2 Domestic incidents where a crime has not occurred. Parties are aged 16 or over and have been intimate partners or family members regardless of sexuality. Hate Incident 0 0 0 Any incident where a crime has not occurred which the victim, or anyone else, thinks is based on someone’s prejudice towards them because of their race, religion, sexual orientation, disability or be- cause they are transgender.
    [Show full text]
  • Foxhunting and the Landscape Between 1700 and 1900; with Particular Reference to Norfolk and Shropshire
    Foxhunting and the landscape between 1700 and 1900; with particular reference to Norfolk and Shropshire Jane Bevan Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of History October 2011 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on the condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived from it, may be published without acknowledgement Abstract This thesis explores the history of foxhunting from 1700 to 1900. It examines how perceptions of an ideal hunting country, and what constituted an elite quarry, altered in tandem with alterations to the English lowland countryside. The relationship between the landscape and changes bought about by the upheaval of enclosure and agricultural development are discussed, in the context of the evolution in practice and geographical spread of foxhunting, at a national, regional and county-wide level. Several long-held beliefs are challenged. The social history of foxhunting and the increased participation of both ‘polite’ urban neophytes and prosperous tenant farmers during the two centuries is compared with the declining involvement of women. The impact of hunt clubs and the rise of subscription packs in the two study areas is contrasted. The influence of changes in the landscape on foxhunting is considered alongside the reciprocal impact of foxhunters manipulating the physical surroundings to enhance their sport. A detailed study of the history of hunting and its most iconic feature, the covert, in Norfolk and Shropshire highlights the importance of landowners control over the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • BARNHAM BROOM and UPPER YARE GROUP NEWS the Archbishop of Canterbury, Is Produced and Delivered to Your Door by Volunteers
    ISSUE 656 BARNHAM BROOM and JUNE 2021 UPPER YARE GROUP NEWS Welcome to the June Group News. Our Curate Rev Dr Louisa Pittman, who has been with us since November 2018, will be leaving us in early July. We will say our farewells at a special service on July 4th (see service grid on back page). We are so grateful to Louisa for her amazing work during these past few years and will be very sad to see her go. The Royal Navy will be getting a fantastic new chaplain! Thank you Nicky of Barnham Broom Neighbourhood Café Photo: May 2nd at All Saints church, Brandon Parva, for another delicious recipe: where Coralie was presented with gifts and warm wishes ——————————————————— to take with her to her new life in Wales. BARNHAM BROOM and UPPER YARE GROUP NEWS The Archbishop of Canterbury, is produced and delivered to your door by volunteers. Justin Welby’s ‘Daily Hope’ CLOSING DATE FOR THE JULY ISSUE: free ‘phone line, 0800 804 8044 Adverts and News by June 6th. is available 24 hours a day. Thank you to all the Group News deliverers. MINISTRY TEAM Rector: Rev. Dr. Tim Weatherstone, The Rectory, Reymerston NR9 4AG [email protected] 01362 858021 Assistant Priest: The Venerable Arthur Hawes 01362 822441 Assistant Curate: Rev. Dr. Louisa Pittman, The Vicarage, Honingham Road, Barnham Broom, NR9 4DB 01603 759641 Email: [email protected] Reader: Roger Walpole, 1 Woodfarm Cottages, Reymerston, NR9 4QZ 01362 820284 GROUP OFFICERS Group Office: The Rectory, The Street, Reymerston, NR9 4AG [email protected] 01362 858021 Group Treasurer: Adrian Rodford, Church Barn, Southburgh, IP25 7TF 01362 822186 Lay Chairman: Philip Richardson, 16, Vicar Street, Wymondham, NR18 0PL 01953 607564 Website: www.groupof15.org.uk F Facebook link: http://www.facebook.com/bbuy2020 Twitter link http://twitter.com/groupof15 GROUP NEWS EDITORIAL TEAM p Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • NORFOLK Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a photograph NORFOLK Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road Parish Location Position NO_BLGU01 TG 18733 28905 BLICKLING By Keepers Cottage against garden fence, E side of track NO_BLHO01 TG 1648 2046 B1354 BLICKLING 200yds W of NO/023 in wood 2 yds from edge of Rd NO_CH08 TG 10116 39761 A148 HIGH KELLING 30yds E of jct with SelBrigg Rd on the verge NO_CH09 TG 08626 39132 HOLT N corner of jct with Laurel Drive rear of pavement against hedge NO_DME1 TF 61197 02531 B1507 DOWNHAM MARKET London Rd, 18yds S of Ryston Close in pavement NO_DME2 TF 6179 0130 (was A10) DENVER Bates Wood, Whin Common on verge NO_DME3 TL 61661 99655 (was A10) FORDHAM opp. church on the verge NO_DME4 TL 62086 98399 (was A10) HILGAY 15yds S of Stocks Hill in pavement against Brick wall NO_DME5 TL 6154 9692 A10 HILGAY 60yds N of jUnction with Modney Bridge Rd on the verge NO_DME6 TL 61890 94539 B1160 SOUTHERY Westgate Street, By No. 35 in hedge NO_DMS5 TF 68369 06368 A1122 FINCHAM By JUBilee HoUse in pavement NO_DMW3 TF 57322 01276 A1122 DOWNHAM MARKET 80yds W of Kontel Kennels on the verge NO_DMW4 TF 55754 01007 A1122 NORDELPH opp. jct with B1094, oUtside "Threeways" on the verge NO_DMW6 TF 53197 02858 A1122 OUTWELL jUst W of entrance to MullicoUrt Priory Farm on narrow verge NO_FADE09 TF 96941 17728 B1146 BEETLEY Fakenham Rd, By "Milestone HoUse", No. 78 on the verge NO_Fel1L TG 19377 39396 pivate path FELBRIGG FelBrigg Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • ETD General Template
    Community and Environmental Services County Hall Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2SG Philip Baum NCC contact number: 0344 800 8020 Broadland District Council Text Relay - 18001 0344 800 8020 Thorpe Lodge 1 Yarmouth Road Thorpe St Andrew Norwich NR7 0DU Your Ref: 20200724 My Ref: 9/5/20/0724 Date: 5 May 2020 Tel No.: 01603 638070 Email: [email protected] Dear Philip Lingwood & Burlingham: Change of use of part of dwelling house to form a single dwelling The Station House,26 Station Road, Lingwood and Burlingham, NR13 4AZ Thank you for your recent consultation with respect to the above. There is some restriction to the visibility to the north of the the junction of the access road with the main highway (northern side) as a result of overgrowth from the boundary hedge and boundary fence/fence post. Whilst the cutting back/maintenance of the hedge, which is currently over growing the highway, would provide some improvement to visibility, this is to the non-critical traffic direction and a minor relaxation in standard is considered acceptable in this location. Furthermore, notwithstanding the increase in traffic movements that would result from this application, if approved, on balance I do not consider I could sustain an objection on visibility grounds alone. I note that the proposal state that parking will be provided, but no specific details of existing and proposed parking provision are supplied. Present parking provision, which is in not delineated in any way, is clearly shared between the needs of the existing property and that of the railway. Whilst the access road is outside the jurisdiction of the highway authority, there will undoubtedly be increased parking demand on the access road and possibly resulting restricted turning provision also; however, I do not consider increased demand would lead to displaced parking on the highway and is more likely to give rise to social issues.
    [Show full text]
  • UNREASONABLE SITES - RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE CLUSTERS – Broadland
    UNREASONABLE SITES - RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE CLUSTERS – Broadland Address Site Reference Area Promoted for Reason considered to be (ha) unreasonable Blofield Heath Blofield Nurseries, Hall GNLP0099 2.85 Up to 25 This site is considered to Road dwellings be unreasonable for allocation as it is located some way beyond the built edge of the village with no safe pedestrian route to Hemblington Primary School. Development of this site would not be well related to the form and character of the settlement. Land to the west of GNLP0288 1.43 24 dwellings This site is considered to Woodbastwick Road be unreasonable for allocation as the planning history suggests there are access constraints which means that the site would only be suitable for small scale development off a private drive. It therefore would not be able to accommodate the minimum allocation size of 12-15 dwellings. Land east of Park GNLP0300 0.78 Residential Although this site is Lane (unspecified adjacent to the existing number) settlement limit it is considered to be unreasonable for allocation as there is no continuous footway to Hemblington Primary School. There is a better located site to meet the capacity of the cluster. Dawson’s Lane GNLP2080 2.65 42 dwellings Although this site is adjacent to the existing settlement limit it is considered to be unreasonable for allocation as there is no continuous footway to Hemblington Primary School. There is a better located site to meet the capacity of the cluster. In addition, the proposed access to the site is Address Site Reference Area Promoted for Reason considered to be (ha) unreasonable currently a narrow track with an unmade surface which would need upgrading to be acceptable.
    [Show full text]