Kidney360 Publish Ahead of Print, published on January 2, 2020 as doi:10.34067/KID.0000742019 Is There a Role for Device Therapies in Resistant Hypertension? The CON Side Aldo J. Peixoto, MD1, 2 1 Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 2 Hypertension Program, Yale New Haven Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, New Haven, CT, USA. Contact information: Aldo J. Peixoto, MD Boardman 114 (Nephrology) 330 Cedar Street New Haven, CT 06520
[email protected] Disclosures: Dr. Peixoto reports grants from Bayer, grants from Lundbeck, personal fees from Diamedica, personal fees from Relypsa, grants from Vascular Dynamics, and personal fees from Ablative Solutions outside the submitted work. Acknowledgments: Author Contributions: Aldo Peixoto: Conceptualization; Writing - original draft; Writing - review and editing 1 In this piece, I will argue that device-based therapies for resistant hypertension (RH), while interesting and meritorious of further study, do not yet deserve a prominent role in the management of patients with RH. This argument is based on the limited availability of controlled studies using devices, the cost and uncertain long-term effectiveness of device modalities, and the successful track record of medical therapy. First, let me define the demand for advanced therapies in RH. Resistant hypertension is defined as blood pressure (BP) of a hypertensive patient that remains above goal despite the concurrent use of three antihypertensive agents of different classes, preferably including a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system, a calcium channel blocker and a thiazide-type diuretic1. The prevalence of RH in the general hypertensive population is 12%-18% based on office BP measurements >140/90 mmHg1, an estimate that is expected to increase by ~2% when the 130/80 mmHg threshold is applied to high-risk patients2.