DOCSLIB.ORG

Glenelg Hopkins Landcare Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Glenelg Hopkins Landcare Program 2012 – 2013 The Project The Glenelg Hopkins CMA Landcare Program Administration grants of $17,400 were The Victorian Government’s 25th Anniversary of received $270,000 through the Victorian allocated to 45 Landcare and NRM groups and Landcare provided an opportunity for Landcarers Landcare Grants program in 2012 - 2013. three networks to assist with insurance and in the Glenelg Hopkins region to reflect on their Additionally the Victorian Government provided administration costs to help groups achievements across two decades. Many of $100,000 to deliver the Victorian Landcare to continue operating. these memories have been captured in a book – Strategic Plan and a further $15,000 to focus on “Landcare Snapshots – Celebrating 25 years of In 2012 the Glenelg Hopkins Landcare Support group recruitment activities. Landcare in the Glenelg Hopkins region”. Strategy 2012 - 2018 was developed with A devolved grants program provides funds for information derived from community, Landcare The three year Regional Landcare Facilitator (RLF) landholders to protect priority wetlands, riparian group meetings and public feedback. position, now in its final year, was initiated by the areas and terrestrial vegetation, as identified It was adopted by the Glenelg Hopkins CMA Australian Government to improve the uptake of through state and regional priorities. The grants Board, and will assist the CMA to support sustainable land management practices. also provide groups with the opportunity to volunteers and landholders. conduct awareness raising activities such as field days, information sessions and publications. The Landcare community contributed an additional $327,500 to complete projects. Talking Points GLENELG HOPKINS CMAWhat’s Next? • 50 Landcare representatives from across the • The region received funding for eight facilitators • The Regional Landcare Gathering proved region attended the inaugural Glenelg Hopkins through the Victorian Government Local to be a popular event and is planned to be Landcare Gathering in October. Landcare Facilitator Initiative 2012. conducted annually. • 380 people attended 17 Carbon Farming • Representatives from three groups • The Victorian Landcare Grants will be reviewed Initiative information sessions. from Glenelg Hopkins attended the National with an emphasis on mapping Landcare Awards as winners in group applications. • Ararat landholders Peter and Christine Forster of their categories in the Victorian are the first farm partnership Landcare Awards. in Victoria to register a revegetation2015-18 project for carbon credits under the Australian Government’s Carbon PROJECTS Farming Initiative (CFI). PROJECT PARTNERS FUNDING & INVESTORS Landcare groups, networks, natural resource management groups, Victorian Government Landcare Program - $270,000 community members and landholders. Victorian Government Strategic Plan Grants - $100,000 Department of Sustainability and Environment, Department of Primary Victorian Government Volunteer Recruitment Grant - $15,000 Industries, South West Dairy reference group, Green Triangle Forest products NRM group, Heytesbury Landcare Network, Nature Glenelg Victorian Government Regional Landcare Trust, Murray Goulburn, Bega, Fonterra, Warrnambool Cheese & Butter, Coordinator Program - $137,000 AGL and Hassad Australia. Australian Government, DAFF - Regional Landcare Coordinator - $150,000 1 Glenelg Hopkins CMA 1 Management Project 2013 - 2012 1 The Glenelg Hopkins CMA region 173 94 Population of approx 5,400 of Victoria’s federally-listed wetlands threatened species 44 per cent of species 130,000 Victoria’s wetlands 220 kilometres of coastline 480,917 ha of Crown Land The region is 13 endangered 26,910 Ecological Vegetation square kilometres Communities Glenelg Hopkins CMA has Project Partnerships with community, landholders, Indigenous groups, Victorian and Australian governments, 11 municipalities, water authorities Landcare and NRM groups and industry. 2 Glenelg Hopkins CMA CEO’s update 2015 Welcome Glenelg Hopkins CMA’s vision of achieving a healthy, natural environment and sustainable community use of natural resources relies on strong partnerships at the regional, state and national level. These partnerships allow us to successfully undertake a wide range of projects funded by both the Victorian and Australian Governments. In alignment with our Regional Catchment Strategy, this provides a coordinated approach to protecting and improving the condition of our land, water and biodiversity resources in the Glenelg Hopkins region. This brochure describes some of the CMA’s key environmental projects, as a snapshot of activities that we will be undertaking over the next few years. For further information contact Glenelg Hopkins CMA on (03) 5571 2526 or visit our website www.ghcma.vic.gov.au Kevin Wood Chief Executive Officer GHCMA Landcare Awards “The CMA and its partners manage a number of landscape-scale projects that together contribute to making a tangible difference to the health of our catchment.” 2015 - 2018 Glenelg Hopkins CMA Projects 3 Sustainable Agriculture 2015 – 2018 The Project Talking Points The Sustainable Agriculture project is funded under The project is delivered as four sub-projects. Three By 30 June 2018: the National Landcare Program. It will build the align with key agricultural enterprises - broadacre • 90 farming entities will have adopted more skills, knowledge and capacity of farmers to make grazing, cropping and dairy - to be delivered in sustainable land management practices and implement land management decisions that partnership with leading industry organisations will improve soil condition, increase or maintain and government agencies. • Over 22,250 hectares will be under more production and protect the natural resource base. sustainable land management practices The fourth sub-project supports community- The project will be delivered through established based initiatives to investigate innovative farming • 16 farming entities will have trialled innovative or new partnerships with industry, government practices, with a focus on farmer-led action and land management practices agencies and community-based organisations. facilitating networks. • 570 land managers will have improved their Delivery programs will be designed to meet the Opportunities are provided for farmers knowledge, skills and awareness of sustainable specific needs of key agricultural enterprises: undertaking change to gain and provide land management practices meat, wool, cropping and dairy. peer support, build confidence and increase • 380 farming entities will have improved their Community groups, Landcare, production and capacity as regional leaders. knowledge, skills and awareness of sustainable industry will be supported to investigate innovative land management practices farming practices through dependable information sources, on-farm trials and demonstrations. • 47 regional community groups will have increased engagement and participation Building on the 2009-13 Australian Government in sustainable NRM. - ‘Reducing the risk of Soil Acidification’, this project provides activities that support adoption of sustainable land management practices and innovation across a range of agricultural enterprises. PROJECT PARTNERS Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Research, WestVic Dairy, Victorian No-Till Farmers Association, Australian Controlled Traffic Farmers Association, Southern Farming Systems, Demo Dairy, Soil Health Group, Landcare Groups, South West Holistic Farmers, Cultivate Agribusiness Central Highlands, Sustainable Agriculture and Community Alliance, Grasslands Society of Southern Australia, Deakin University FUNDING & INVESTORS Australian Government - $1,314,041 Sheep Farming - Grangeburn Bocharra 4 Glenelg Hopkins CMA Threatened species and communities 2015 – 2018 The Project Threatened species programs remain a high Target threatened species include Striped Legless A range of targeted extension and monitoring priority throughout the Glenelg Hopkins region. Lizard, Eastern Barred Bandicoot, Golden Sun activities across the project area will be delivered Moth, Red-tailed Black Cockatoo, Swift Parrot, to reduce critical threats to, and enhance the The project area is primarily focused on the Brolga and ten threatened flora species. condition, connectivity, resilience and knowledge Victorian Volcanic Plains (VVP) and Goldfields of, threatened species and communities. Bioregions, both of which are regional, state Four nationally threatened Ecological Communities and national priorities. will be targeted through this project: Natural Temperate Grasslands, Grassy Eucalypt Woodlands, Grey Box Grassy Woodlands and Seasonal Herbaceous Wetlands. Talking Points • The Threatened Species sub-project will • The Engagement sub-project will work with • The Grassland Monitoring sub-project will be delivered by DELWP and Birdlife Australia, a range of partners and community groups to work with two delivery partners and numerous and will work with a range of partners and deliver two key five-year outcomes: landholders to better protect and conserve community groups to protect and enhance nationally and internationally significant 1) promote the continued use, support 2,200 ha of existing nationally-listed ecosystems, species, ecological communities and reinvigoration of Indigenous ecological communities and manage and landscapes. ecological knowledge to underpin 85,330 ha for threatened species. biodiversity conservation. •
Recommended publications
  • Action Statement No.134

    Action Statement No.134

    Action statement No.134 Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 Yarra Pygmy Perch Nannoperca obscura © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover photo: Tarmo Raadik Compiled by: Daniel Stoessel ISBN: 978-1-74146-670-6 (pdf) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136 186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677, email www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au Action Statement No. 134 Yarra Pygmy Perch Nannoperca obscura Description The Yarra Pygmy Perch (Nannoperca obscura) fragmented and characterised by moderate levels is a small perch-like member of the family of genetic differentiation between sites, implying Percichthyidae that attains a total length of 75 mm poor dispersal ability (Hammer et al.
  • Hopkins Basin Chapter

    Hopkins Basin Chapter

    6.24 Hopkins basin 6.24 Hopkins basin The Hopkins basin (Figure 6-45) is in south-western Victoria. The two major rivers within the basin are the Merri River and the Hopkins River. Figure 6-45 Hopkins basin 6.24.1 Management arrangements Management of water in the Hopkins basin is undertaken by various parties, as shown in Table 6-154. Table 6-154 Water resource management responsibilities, Hopkins basin Authority Management responsibilities Southern Rural Water Manages groundwater and surface water licensed diversions (except Loddon Highlands WSPA, which is managed by Goulburn-Murray Water) Wannon Water Supplies towns and cities in the south of the basin including Warrnambool GWMWater Supplies towns and cities in the north of the basin including Ararat Central Highlands Water Supplies towns in the north-east of the basin including Beaufort and Skipton Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Responsible for waterway and catchment management in the whole of the Hopkins basin Management Authority 6.24.2 2019–20 water resources overview In 2019–20, rainfall: in most of the basin was 80% to 100% of the long-term average in two areas in the centre of the basin near Mortlake was 100% to 125%. Catchment inflows to the basin in 2019–20 were 83% of the long-term average annual volume of 325,100 ML, greater than in 2018–19 when inflows were 42% of the long-term average. Victorian Water Accounts 2019–20 200 6.24 Hopkins basin Figure 6-46 Catchment inflows, Hopkins basin 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 Inflow (ML) Inflow 400,000 200,000 0 Catchment Inflow Long-term average inflow Similar to the previous year, Brucknell Creek, the Hopkins and Merri rivers and Mount Emu Creek all began 2019–20 on a stage 1 roster.
  • Panel Report

    Panel Report

    WARRNAMBOOL PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C43 PANEL REPORT MAY 2006 WARRNAMBOOL PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C43 PANEL REPORT JENNIFER A MOLES, CHAIR ELIZABETH BENSZ, MEMBER MAY 2006 WARRNAMBOOL PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C43 PANEL REPORT: MAY 2006 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. WHAT IS PROPOSED? .......................................................................................................... 6 1.1 WHAT LAND IS AFFECTED? ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 STRATEGIC NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT............................................................ 6 1.3 DETAILS OF THE AMENDMENT .................................................................................. 6 1.4 EXHIBITION OF THE AMENDMENT.......................................................................... 12 1.5 PLANNING AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION OF SUBMISSIONS............................ 12 1.6 APPOINTMENT OF PANEL AND HEARINGS............................................................ 13 2. STRATEGIC CONTEXT ...................................................................................................... 14 2.1 STATE PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK (SPPF) .................................................. 14 2.1.1 The MSS Review......................................................................................................... 15 2.1.2 Other Wcc Strategies and Policies.............................................................................
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations

    Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations

    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.
  • Rural Ararat Heritage Study Volume 4

    Rural Ararat Heritage Study Volume 4

    Rural Ararat Heritage Study Volume 4. Ararat Rural City Thematic Environmental History Prepared for Ararat Rural City Council by Dr Robyn Ballinger and Samantha Westbrooke March 2016 History in the Making This report was developed with the support PO Box 75 Maldon VIC 3463 of the Victorian State Government RURAL ARARAT HERITAGE STUDY – VOLUME 4 THEMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY Table of contents 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 The study area 1 1.2 The heritage significance of Ararat Rural City's landscape 3 2.0 The natural environment 4 2.1 Geomorphology and geology 4 2.1.1 West Victorian Uplands 4 2.1.2 Western Victorian Volcanic Plains 4 2.2 Vegetation 5 2.2.1 Vegetation types of the Western Victorian Uplands 5 2.2.2 Vegetation types of the Western Victoria Volcanic Plains 6 2.3 Climate 6 2.4 Waterways 6 2.5 Appreciating and protecting Victoria’s natural wonders 7 3.0 Peopling Victoria's places and landscapes 8 3.1 Living as Victoria’s original inhabitants 8 3.2 Exploring, surveying and mapping 10 3.3 Adapting to diverse environments 11 3.4 Migrating and making a home 13 3.5 Promoting settlement 14 3.5.1 Squatting 14 3.5.2 Land Sales 19 3.5.3 Settlement under the Land Acts 19 3.5.4 Closer settlement 22 3.5.5 Settlement since the 1960s 24 3.6 Fighting for survival 25 4.0 Connecting Victorians by transport 28 4.1 Establishing pathways 28 4.1.1 The first pathways and tracks 28 4.1.2 Coach routes 29 4.1.3 The gold escort route 29 4.1.4 Chinese tracks 30 4.1.5 Road making 30 4.2 Linking Victorians by rail 32 4.3 Linking Victorians by road in the 20th
  • Victorian Recreational Fishing Guide 2021

    Victorian Recreational Fishing Guide 2021

    FREE TARGET ONE MILLION ONE MILLION VICTORIANS FISHING #target1million VICTORIAN RECREATIONAL FISHING A GUIDE TO FISHING RULES AND PRACTICES 2021 GUIDE 2 Introduction 55 Waters with varying bag and size limits 2 (trout and salmon) 4 Message from the Minister 56 Trout and salmon regulations 5 About this guide 60 Year-round trout and salmon fisheries 6 Target One Million 61 Trout and salmon family fishing lakes 9 Marine and estuarine fishing 63 Spiny crays 10 Marine and estuarine scale fish 66 Yabbies 20 Sharks, skates and rays 68 Freshwater shrimp and mussels 23 Crabs INTRODUCTION 69 Freshwater fishing restrictions 24 Shrimps and prawns 70 Freshwater fishing equipment 26 Rock lobster 70 Using equipment in inland waters 30 Shellfish 74 Illegal fishing equipment 33 Squid, octopus and cuttlefish 74 Bait and berley 34 Molluscs 76 Recreational fishing licence 34 Other invertebrates 76 Licence information 35 Marine fishing equipment 78 Your fishing licence fees at work 36 Using equipment in marine waters 82 Recreational harvest food safety 40 Illegal fishing equipment 82 Food safety 40 Bait and berley 84 Responsible fishing behaviours 41 Waters closed to recreational fishing 85 Fishing definitions 41 Marine waters closed to recreational fishing 86 Recreational fishing water definitions 41 Aquaculture fisheries reserves 86 Water definitions 42 Victoria’s marine national parks 88 Regulation enforcement and sanctuaries 88 Fisheries officers 42 Boundary markers 89 Reporting illegal fishing 43 Restricted areas 89 Rule reminders 44 Intertidal zone
  • Heritage Rivers Act 1992 No

    Heritage Rivers Act 1992 No

    Version No. 014 Heritage Rivers Act 1992 No. 36 of 1992 Version incorporating amendments as at 7 December 2007 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section Page 1 Purpose 1 2 Commencement 1 3 Definitions 1 4 Crown to be bound 4 5 Heritage river areas 4 6 Natural catchment areas 4 7 Powers and duties of managing authorities 4 8 Management plans 5 8A Disallowance of management plan or part of a management plan 7 8B Effect of disallowance of management plan or part of a management plan 8 8C Notice of disallowance of management plan or part of a management plan 8 9 Contents of management plans 8 10 Land and water uses which are not permitted in heritage river areas 8 11 Specific land and water uses for particular heritage river areas 9 12 Land and water uses which are not permitted in natural catchment areas 9 13 Specific land and water uses for particular natural catchment areas 10 14 Public land in a heritage river area or natural catchment area is not to be disposed of 11 15 Act to prevail over inconsistent provisions 11 16 Managing authority may act in an emergency 11 17 Power to enter into agreements 12 18 Regulations 12 19–21 Repealed 13 22 Transitional provision 13 23 Further transitional and savings provisions 14 __________________ i Section Page SCHEDULES 15 SCHEDULE 1—Heritage River Areas 15 SCHEDULE 2—Natural Catchment Areas 21 SCHEDULE 3—Restricted Land and Water Uses in Heritage River Areas 25 SCHEDULE 4—Specific Land and Water Uses for Particular Heritage River Areas 27 SCHEDULE 5—Specific Land and Water Uses for Particular Natural Catchment Areas 30 ═══════════════ ENDNOTES 31 1.
  • South-Western Victoria, Australia

    South-Western Victoria, Australia

    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Baird, Robert F., 1992. Fossil avian assemblage of pitfall origin from Holocene sediments in Amphitheatre Cave (G-2), south-western Victoria, Australia. Records of the Australian Museum 44(1): 21–44. [28 May 1992]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.44.1992.27 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia Records of the Australian Museum (1992) Vo1.44: 21-44. ISSN 0067-1975 21 Fossil Avian Assemblage of Pitfall Origin from Holocene Sediments in Amphitheatre Cave (G-2), South-western Victoria, Australia ROBERT F. BAIRD Department of Ornithology, Museum of Victoria, Abbotsford, Vic. 3067, Australia Current address: Victorian Institute of Earth and Planetary Sciences, GPO Box 2729X, Melbourne, Vic. 3001, Australia ABSTRACT. The fossil avian assemblage from Amphitheatre Cave (6 km north of the township of Nelson, Victoria, Australia) consists of 27 species of birds. Three dominate the assemblage with 63% of the total minimum number of individuals (i.e., Gallinula mortierii, Dasyornis broadbenti and Dasyornis brachypterus). Most of the material originated from a pitfall accumulation, based upon the large percentage of individuals belonging to terrestrial species with elements lacking
  • South West (Barwon) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-Plan Version 1, August 2019

    South West (Barwon) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-Plan Version 1, August 2019

    South West (Barwon) Region Emergency Response Plan Mid West (Grampians) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-plan, Version 1.0, 30 September 2018 1 Flood Sub-plan Published by Victoria State Emergency Service Melbourne, August 2019. This publication is intended to be consistent with the State Emergency Response Plan (SERP), published by Emergency Management Victoria (EMV) in 2016. Authorised by the Victoria State Emergency Service (VICSES), 168 Sturt Street, Southbank. An electronic version of the plan can be obtained at: https://www.ses.vic.gov.au/em-sector/vicses-emergency- plans. Version Control South West (Barwon) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-plan Version 1, August 2019 South West (Barwon) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-plan, Version 1.0, August 2019 2 South West (Barwon) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-plan Certification The South West (Barwon) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-plan deals with response to flood incidents within the South West (Barwon) area of responsibility. The following plan is intended to provide the framework for South West (Barwon) Region to effectively and efficiently respond to future emergencies caused by floods and will remain current until rescinded by authority of the Victoria State Emergency Service (VICSES) Chief Officer Operations. _______________________________________ Date: _______10___ October________ _2019_______ Tim Wiebusch Chief Officer Operations This plan is produced by VICSES and has been adapted from the SERP – Flood Sub-plan. All information contained in this plan was current at time of publication. VICSES would like to acknowledge the significant contribution of key stakeholders to ensure the content contained within this plan is of a high quality to support response activities.
  • James Dawson's Intervention in the Naming of the Maroondah Aqueduct

    James Dawson's Intervention in the Naming of the Maroondah Aqueduct

    91 IAN D CLARK James Dawson’s intervention in the naming of the Maroondah aqueduct In an early history of Melbourne’s water supply, EG Ritchie discussed the Maroondah aqueduct and confirmed its change of name from Watts to Maroondah when the aqueduct was brought into use in February 1891.1 Ritchie noted that in the early 1880s, authorities recognised ‘a large new supplementary scheme was a vital necessity for the rapidly growing population, and surveys for the purpose of tapping the Watts River and its tributaries near Healesville were actively prosecuted’.2 In 1886, construction started on an aqueduct for this purpose. It was completed and officially opened in February 1891, when the name of the river and system was changed to ‘Maroondah’. Likewise, Tony Dingle and Carolyn Rasmussen in their centenary history of the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works discussed the completion of the Watts River works in early 1891 and noted that the ‘name of the river and the catchment was changed to Maroondah’.3 Nowhere does either history discuss the reasons for the change of name or the agency behind it. The purpose of this article is to reveal that James Dawson was, in all likelihood, responsible for the change of name from Watts to Maroondah, and to contextualise this in terms of his strident advocacy for Aboriginal interests, including Aboriginal placenames, and his association with the upper Yarra, which began in 1840 when he first arrived in Victoria and established a station on the Yarra near Anderson’s Creek. 92 The La Trobe Journal No.
  • Lower Glenelg National Park, Discovery Bay

    Lower Glenelg National Park, Discovery Bay

    Lower Glenelg National Park, Discovery Bay Coastal Park Visitor Guide These two parks offer some of Victoria’s finest natural settings including the beautiful Glenelg River and estuary, and the sweeping ocean beaches of Discovery Bay. Explore the freshwater lakes and discover a wide range of bird life, or enjoy a cruise on the Glenelg River. Walk among massive dunes, hike the Great South West Walk or camp beside the river. The separate Glenelg River Guide details canoe campsites and motor boating safety. River cruise Drive Relax by taking a river cruise from Nelson and carefully…this n o t e s park is the discover the wide variety of wildlife and plants on wombats last your way. stronghold in south west Victoria. Wildlife abounds Native animals, though sometimes difficult to Things to see and do find, include Eastern Grey kangaroos, Red- necked wallabies, Brush-tail possums, koalas Parks provide a multitude of activities for visitors and echidnas. In the more remote and to enjoy. Camping, fishing, horse riding, touring, undisturbed areas, rare animals such as Heath bushwalking, mountain biking, or 4WD, there’s Rats, Swamp Antechinus and Potoroos can be something for everyone. found. Small colonies of Wombats inhabit Lower Glenelg National Park (LGNP), the only Walking remnants of a once widespread population in the The internationally acclaimed Great South West south west region of Victoria. Walk allows for a number of short or longer Some of the more common large birds include walks. Starting and ending at Portland, the emus, herons and ducks. Other less common p a r k 250km route passes through forest and species are the Spotted Quail-Thrush, Painted heathlands, along rivers and via wind-swept Quail, Ground Thrush, Azure Kingfisher, and the coastal cliffs and beaches.
  • The Glenelg River Restoration Project – the Story So Far the Glenelg River

    The Glenelg River Restoration Project – the Story So Far the Glenelg River

    Four years of restoration on The Glenelg River Restoration Project – the story so far the Glenelg River. History 2004 - 2008 The Glenelg River is the largest river in south ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE LARGE SCALE RESTORATION PROJECT 2004 - 2008 west Victoria, and at 500 kms in length, it drains a catchment area of 11,998 km3. The river rises in the Grampians Ranges in the • Fencing and protecting 230 km of waterways, 704 ha of • Construction of carp screening units on the outlet of • Ecological assessments to maximise the value of north, and flows south to the Southern Ocean remnant vegetation and the establishment of another Rocklands reservoir to prevent Carp movement flow delivery at Nelson adjacent to Victoria’s border with 744 ha of revegetation downstream, and monitoring to establish the extent of • Removal of five barriers to fish passage on the Crawford South Australia. carp presence • Removal of approximately 180,000 m3 of sand from the and Stokes Rivers and Moleside Creek, opening an The Glenelg Hopkins River Health Strategy main river channel and the establishment of • Establishment of an Environmental Water Reserve for the additional 198 kms of waterway to fish passage gives a high priority to the Glenelg River due habitat refuge pools Glenelg River • Mapping high priority erosion areas across the Dundas to its high environmental values that are • Reinstatement of 870 large logs • Construction of outlet structures to ensure delivery of and Merino tablelands and the commencement of erosion under threat. The management of threats has Victoria been the ongoing focus for funding and to 8.5 kms of the river bed flows to the river control measures in this area Glenelg Basin in the resource allocation in the Glenelg.