DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Future of Governance in Canada Is Explored

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of COVID-19 on the Future of Governance in Canada Is Explored Table of Contents About the Authors ....................................................................................................................3 Preface ..........................................................................................................................................5 Introduction: A Results-Based Synopsis .............................................................................6 The Impact and Implications of COVID-19 on Selected Areas of Governance in Canada The Executive and Parliament The Perils of Reduced Parliamentary Scrutiny ........................................................................9 Multiparty Agreements and A Better Model for Parliament during Crisis .......................... 17 Parliament: Managing Change during the Pandemic .......................................................... 23 COVID-19, Cabinet, and Central Agencies............................................................................ 35 Public Sector/Service Public Policy and Delivery: Temporary Response or Creating New Pathways? .................. 42 Intergovernmental Relations Fiscal Transfers, Discipline and the Sustainability of Provincial Debt .................................. 54 A Local Government Response to the Pandemic: The Kingston Case ................................. 62 At the Intersection of Law and Politics Accountability to Law through Litigation ............................................................................. 75 Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 92 Appendices Appendix A: COVID-19 Political and Policy Chronology in Canada ...................................... 96 Appendix B: PROC and Virtual Voting in the House of Commons ....................................... 98 2 About the Authors Dr. Kathy L. Brock, professor and senior fellow, School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University, chair of the National Accreditation Board for Programs in Public Administration, and former president of the Canadian Association of Programs in Public Administration. She has advised FPT and Indigenous governments and leaders on governance issues. She is co-author of Canadian Politics Today: Democracy, Diversity and Good Government (Pearson, 2020). Helen Cooper, distinguished fellow, School of Policy Studies, former mayor, City of Kingston. She is a former president of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and a former chair of the Ontario Municipal Board. Toby Fyfe, President, President of the Canada-based not-for-profit Institute on Governance, and SPS Advisory Council member. He has over 20 years’ experience as an executive with the Government of Canada, including central agencies and government departments. He provides support to government institutions and leaders across Canada and internationally as they respond to the challenges of public-sector governance in the 21st century. Andrew Graham, adjunct professor, School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University, and former ADM with over 30 years in the Canadian public service. He was formerly the national editor of the Case Study Program of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada and is author of Canadian Public Sector Financial Management. His academic focus is on the public service, leadership, management, and financial management. He also works extensively on police governance issues nationally and with First Nations. Kyle Hanniman, assistant professor of political studies and research fellow at the Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen's University. His research interests include comparative federalism, political economy, public debt, and Canadian politics. His commentary has appeared in the Globe and Mail, National Post, and Financial Post. Samantha Kieffer, MPA candidate, School of Policy Studies, Queen's University. She has begun her career as a program officer with the federal public service and her continued research interests include taxation mechanisms and trade policy. Eugene Lang, adjunct professor, School of Policy Studies, and fellow, Canadian Global Affairs Institute. He has worked in five federal government departments, in both the public service and in ministers’ offices. Lang is co-author (with Janice Stein) of The Unexpected War: Canada in Kandahar. Graeme Murray, MPA candidate and research assistant to the Governance Working Group, School of Policy Studies. He is a former writer for the McGill International Review and has published in the McGill Journal of Political Studies. 3 Gregory Tardi, executive director of the Institute of Parliamentary and Political Law and executive editor of the Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law; former legal counsel at Elections Canada and senior parliamentary counsel in the Office of the Law Clerk of the House of Commons. He is author of The Theory and Practice of Political Law (2016) and Anatomy of an Election (2020). Dr. Lori Turnbull, adjunct professor, School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University, and director, School of Policy Studies, Dalhousie University. She was former policy advisor in the Privy Council Office of Canada, liaison to the minister of democratic institutions, and at the Priorities and Planning Secretariat. Co-author of Democratizing the Constitution: Reforming Responsible Government (2011). Table of Contents 4 Preface Governments around the world have been under extreme pressure to develop responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. After achieving some success in the early months of the disruption, Canada once again sees rising COVID cases in many provinces. Governance decisions have never been more critical. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic will be felt by every Canadian and affect every aspect of our economy and society. The responses that are implemented will have long-term implications for the citizens of this country. A rapidly-evolving mindset has shifted from ‘how can we recover’ to ‘how can we recover better than we were before’. The challenge for policymakers thus has morphed from simply responding to the outbreak, to designing policy that supports the specialized goals of various groups across our population. This is an extremely significant challenge; while health policy remains ascendant, there is a growing need to coordinate policy across a number of related areas in designing countermeasures, including (but not limited to) policies grouped in the following eight categories: arts & culture, economics & employment, education, energy & environment, governance, health & healthcare mental health, and security. To accelerate the development of strong policies that can facilitate Canada’s recovery from COVID-19, the School of Policy Studies at Queen’s University launched a research programme in the summer of 2020 that brought together researchers from across Queen’s University and beyond to consider options in each of the eight policy categories identified above. In this report, the impact of COVID-19 on the future of governance in Canada is explored. In this paper, the authors explore the implications of COVID-19 on different aspects of governance across Canada, with a particular focus on the federal government, the operations of parliament, and the cabinet. The ability of the public service to create new pathways to governance is investigated. The important role of provinces and cities are also covered through case studies, and the implications for future laws are described. This paper brings together an array of extremely informed authors, organized by Professor Kathy Brock of the School of Policy Studies. They make an important contribution to one of the most important public policy discussions of our time. As Director of the School of Policy Studies, I would like to thank each of our contributors for their work. Warren Mabee, Director, School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University Table of Contents 5 The Impact of COVID-19 on the Future of Governance in Canada: A White Paper Just like in wartime, people are frightened, public attitudes are changing, and the circumstances are necessitating a big expansion of the government’s role. John Cassidy, The New Yorker, April 3, 2020 Question: What is white and black but seldom red (read)? Answer: A white paper. – Anonymous Introduction: A Results-Based Synopsis Kathy Brock with Graeme Murray Canada shut down in March 2020. The spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) worldwide had reached the Canadian shores, inspiring fears that the public healthcare system would be overwhelmed as Canadians fought for their health and lives. To prevent these fears from becoming reality, the Canadian governments ordered a shutdown of social and economic activity nationwide and closure of the entire border for the first time in Canadian history. Only essential services were permitted to operate. Canadian governments shifted into overdrive in an effort to keep Canadians well informed, healthy, and economically viable. The extent of government activity at the federal level is traced in the chronology presented in Appendix A. While the health, economic and social effects of this WHO-designated pandemic have received much attention, the impact of the pandemic on government operations in the immediate and long term have remained underexplored. And yet, government is being transformed. Not only has its role in society and the economy expanded enormously, its ways of working from the practical to the theoretical assumptions of good governance have been fundamentally changed. Is this change temporary or a paradigmatic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lições Aprendidas Na Condução De Projetos Horizontais
    ENAP Cadernos Do heróico ao cotidiano: lições aprendidas na condução de projetos horizontais Mark Hopkins, Chantal Couture e Elizabeth Moore 1 ENAP Cadernos Do heróico ao cotidiano: lições aprendidas na condução de projetos horizontais 2 Fundação Escola Nacional de Administração Pública Presidente Helena Kerr do Amaral Diretor de Comunicação e Pesquisa Célio Yassuyu Fujiwara Diretor de Gestão Interna Augusto Akira Chiba Diretora de Desenvolvimento Gerencial Margaret Baroni Diretora de Formação Profissional Sandra Holanda Centro Canadense para o Desenvolvimento da Gestão. Do heróico ao cotidiano: lições aprendidas na condução de projetos horizontais / Mark Hopkins, Chantal Couture, Elizabeth Moore; traduzido por Luís Marcos B. L. de Vasconcelos. Brasília: ENAP, 2003. 108 p. (Cadernos ENAP, 24) Tradução de: Moving from the heroic to the everyday: lessons learned from leading horizontal projects. Mesa-redonda de pesquisa-ação do CCMD sobre a gestão de questões horizontais. ISSN 0104 – 7078 1. Administração Pública – América do Norte. 2. Serviços Públicos. 3. Gestão Pública. 4. Governança e governabilidade. 5. Técnicas gerenciais. I. Canadian Centre Management Development – CCMD. II. James Lahey. III. Título. Cadernos ENAP é uma publicação da Fundação Escola Nacional de Administração Pública Editor: Célio Yassuyu Fujiwara – Coordenação de publicação: Livino Silva Neto – Supervisão de produção gráfica: Rodrigo Luiz Rodrigues Galletti – Editoração eletrônica: Ana Carla Gualberto e Maria Marta da Rocha Vasconcelos – Revisão: Luis Antonio Violin
    [Show full text]
  • ONLINE INCIVILITY and ABUSE in CANADIAN POLITICS Chris
    ONLINE INCIVILITY AND ABUSE IN CANADIAN POLITICS Chris Tenove Heidi Tworek TROLLED ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL ONLINE INCIVILITY AND ABUSE IN CANADIAN POLITICS CHRIS TENOVE • HEIDI TWOREK COPYRIGHT Copyright © 2020 Chris Tenove; Heidi Tworek; Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions, University of British Columbia. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. CITATION Tenove, Chris, and Heidi Tworek (2020) Trolled on the Campaign Trail: Online Incivility and Abuse in Canadian Politics. Vancouver: Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions, University of British Columbia. CONTACT DETAILS Chris Tenove, [email protected] (Corresponding author) Heidi Tworek, [email protected] CONTENTS AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES ..................................................................................................................1 RESEARCHERS ...............................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................5 FACING INCIVILITY IN #ELXN43 ....................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Crisis
    Briefing on the New Parliament December 12, 2019 CONFIDENTIAL – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Regional Seat 8 6 ON largely Flip from NDP to Distribution static 33 36 Bloc Liberals pushed out 10 32 Minor changes in Battleground B.C. 16 Liberals lose the Maritimes Goodale 1 12 1 1 2 80 10 1 1 79 1 14 11 3 1 5 4 10 17 40 35 29 33 32 15 21 26 17 11 4 8 4 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 BC AB MB/SK ON QC AC Other 2 Seats in the House Other *As of December 5, 2019 3 Challenges & opportunities of minority government 4 Minority Parliament In a minority government, Trudeau and the Liberals face a unique set of challenges • Stable, for now • Campaign driven by consumer issues continues 5 Minority Parliament • Volatile and highly partisan • Scaled back agenda • The budget is key • Regulation instead of legislation • Advocacy more complicated • House committee wild cards • “Weaponized” Private Members’ Bills (PMBs) 6 Kitchen Table Issues and Other Priorities • Taxes • Affordability • Cost of Living • Healthcare Costs • Deficits • Climate Change • Indigenous Issues • Gender Equality 7 National Unity Prairies and the West Québéc 8 Federal Fiscal Outlook • Parliamentary Budget Officer’s most recent forecast has downgraded predicted growth for the economy • The Liberal platform costing projected adding $31.5 billion in new debt over the next four years 9 The Conservatives • Campaigned on cutting regulatory burden, review of “corporate welfare” • Mr. Scheer called a special caucus meeting on December 12 where he announced he was stepping
    [Show full text]
  • The Annotated Accessible Canada Act - Complete Text
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Law Publications Faculty of Law 5-13-2021 The Annotated Accessible Canada Act - Complete Text Laverne Jacobs University of Windsor, Faculty of Law Martin Anderson Rachel Rohr Tom Perry Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/lawpub Part of the Disability Law Commons Recommended Citation Jacobs, Laverne; Anderson, Martin; Rohr, Rachel; and Perry, Tom. (2021). The Annotated Accessible Canada Act - Complete Text. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/lawpub/126 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty of Law at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Annotated Accessible Canada Act 2020 1 The Annotated Accessible Canada Act 2020 The Annotated Accessible Canada Act (S.C. 2019, c. 10) Laverne Jacobs, Martin Anderson, Rachel Rohr and Tom Perry The Law Disability & Social Change Project https://lawdisabilitysocialchange.com/ This document is available in MS Word via the Law, Disability & Social Change website. 2 The Annotated Accessible Canada Act 2020 The Law, Disability & Social Change Project The Law, Disability & Social Change (LDSC) Project team conducts research into current legal and policy issues to help empower people with disabilities to fully achieve their rights and, more generally, to foster and develop inclusive communities. The Project aims to further the motto “nothing about us without us”. The LDSC Project team undertakes a variety of projects that feed grounded research and theory into policy development and legal decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity 2018
    Canadian Association of Rhodes Scholars Volume LXVII, I ISBN 0821/039X Trinity 2018 1 CONTENTS From the Editor 3 From the President of CARS 4 Sailing Weekend Invitation 6 Oxford through the years 8 Letter from Oxford My Next Step 1968, 50 Years On Conversations with… 12 Jonathan Wilkinson MP, North Vancouver Andrew Wilkinson MLA, Vancouver-Quilchena Canadian Rhodes Scholars Foundation update 19 Rhodes Trust announcements 21 Elizabeth Kiss appointed as Warden and CEO Richard Pan named Canadian National Secretary Scholars in the News 25 In Memoriam 26 CARS Membership Renewal 28 2 FROM THE EDITOR Dear Readers, Those eagle-eyed among you will note a refreshed look for the CARS newsletter. Continuing in the fine (recent) tradition of physicians editing a newsletter that historically has mostly been about current affairs and politics, I am delighted to take the rein from Luke Pike (Newfoundland & St. John’s 2007) with this, my first issue of the CARS newsletter as editor. We have an all-new CARS Executive as well, and have spent the last half year getting to know each other and locating the bylaws in various basements and shoeboxes around the country (see our President’s letter for more details). My sincere thanks to Mark Schaan (Prairies and New 2002) for his leadership as President over these past few years and to Katie Sheehan (Prairies and Merton 2002) for her guidance in putting together this newsletter. You will note that Steve Aylward describes this process as ‘cat-herding’; as a proud born-and-raised Albertan I would prefer ‘cattle-herding’ or something to that effect, but the metaphor is ultimately the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief by Professor François Larocque Research Chair In
    BRIEF BY PROFESSOR FRANÇOIS LAROCQUE RESEARCH CHAIR IN LANGUAGE RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA PRESENTED TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON OFFICIAL LANGUAGES AS PART OF ITS STUDY OF THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGES REFORM PROPOSAL UNVEILED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2021, BY THE MINISTER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICIAL LANGUAGES, ENGLISH AND FRENCH: TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES IN CANADA MAY 31, 2021 Professor François Larocque Faculty of Law, Common Law Section University of Ottawa 57 Louis Pasteur Ottawa, ON K1J 6N5 Telephone: 613-562-5800, ext. 3283 Email: [email protected] 1. Thank you very much to the honourable members of the Senate Standing Committee on Official Languages (the “Committee”) for inviting me to testify and submit a brief as part of the study of the official languages reform proposal entitled French and English: Towards a Substantive Equality of Official Languages in Canada (“the reform proposal”). A) The reform proposal includes ambitious and essential measures 2. First, I would like to congratulate the Minister of Economic Development and Official Languages for her leadership and vision. It is, in my opinion, the most ambitious official languages reform proposal since the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 (“CA1982”)1 and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”),2 which enshrined the main provisions of the Official Languages Act (“OLA”)3 of 1969 in the Canadian Constitution. The last reform of the OLA was in 1988 and it is past time to modernize it to adapt it to Canada’s linguistic realities and challenges in the 21st century. 3. The Charter and the OLA proclaim that “English and French are the official languages of Canada and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and government of Canada.”4 In reality, however, as reported by Statistics Canada,5 English is dominant everywhere, while French is declining, including in Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • Trudeau Attacks Calls to Close Borders: “There Is a Lot of Knee-Jerk Reaction That Isn’T Keeping People Safe”
    The road to Canada's COVID-19 outbreak, Pt. 3: timeline of federal government failure at border to slow the virus Author of the article: David Staples • Edmonton Journal Publishing date: April 3, 2020 • 29 minute read Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks from behind a podium bearing the hyperlink to a federal government website about the coronavirus disease during a press conference about COVID-19 in front of his residence at Rideau Cottage in Ottawa, on Sunday, March 22, 2020. JUSTIN TANG / THE CANADIAN PRESS Pt. 3, March: Trudeau attacks calls to close borders: “There is a lot of knee-jerk reaction that isn’t keeping people safe” COVID-19 exploded upon the world in March 2020, shutting down much of the economy in Europe and North America by mid-month, just as it had already done in Asia in January and February. But early in the month, the Liberal government in Ottawa clung to the notion that it must not close its borders to travellers, or quarantine them when they arrived, even as that was by then standard practice in Asia, and even as infection brought in by travellers were spreading in Canadian towns and cities. Yet by the end of the month, the Liberal policy did a complete about-face, shutting down our borders. In Parts 1 and 2, we looked at the multi-partisan in effort to dig in and question Canada‟s border policies on COVID-19. In Part. 3 of our series, the timeline is extended into March, detailing the key quotes and debates leading to the federal policy change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliament
    The Parliament is composed of 3 distinct elements,the Queen1 the Senate and the House of Representatives.2 These 3 elements together characterise the nation as being a constitutional monarchy, a parliamentary democracy and a federation. The Constitution vests in the Parliament the legislative power of the Common- wealth. The legislature is bicameral, which is the term commoniy used to indicate a Par- liament of 2 Houses. Although the Queen is nominally a constituent part of the Parliament the Consti- tution immediately provides that she appoint a Governor-General to be her representa- tive in the Commonwealth.3 The Queen's role is little more than titular as the legislative and executive powers and functions of the Head of State are vested in the Governor- General by virtue of the Constitution4, and by Letters Patent constituting the Office of Governor-General.5 However, while in Australia, the Sovereign has performed duties of the Governor-General in person6, and in the event of the Queen being present to open Parliament, references to the Governor-General in the relevant standing orders7 are to the extent necessary read as references to the Queen.s The Royal Style and Titles Act provides that the Queen shall be known in Australia and its Territories as: Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth.* There have been 19 Governors-General of Australia10 since the establishment of the Commonwealth, 6 of whom (including the last 4) have been Australian born. The Letters Patent, of 29 October 1900, constituting the office of Governor- General, 'constitute, order, and declare that there shall be a Governor-General and Commander-in-Chief in and over' the Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • What Would the Incise Index Say About Canada Now?
    Optimumonline.ca vol. 49, no. 1 (spring 2019) Integrity as a Required Element of Civil Service Effectiveness – What would the InCiSE Index Say About Canada Now? Ian Peach The International Civil Service Effectiveness (InCiSE) Index is a project of the Blavatnik School of Government and the Institute for Government in the United Kingdom.1 It was designed to analyse the effectiveness of participating countries’ central government civil services because, as the partners explain, “An effective civil service plays an important role in driving forward a country’s progress and prosperity. An ineffective one can act as a brake on these things.”2 The analysis is based on both the “core functions” of governments (the “what” of governing), with the effectiveness of governments in delivering 11 core functions analysed, and the “attributes” of government (the “how” of governing), with six key attributes of good government, which affect the quality of the delivery of core functions, analysed.3 As it is described in the 2017 InCiSE report, “Every civil service has an underlying set of behavioural characteristics or traits which are important drivers of how effectively core functions are delivered, for example levels of openness, integrity and inclusiveness. … Cultivating and displaying these attributes is commonly … understood to be good practice. They are also key determinants of an organisation’s overall effectiveness.”4 One of the six key attributes analysed was “integrity”, which was defined by six themes: corruption level perceptions; adherence to rules and procedures; work ethics; fairness and impartiality; striving to serve citizens and ministers; and processes in place to preserve integrity and prevent conflicts of interest.5 The first InCiSE Index, released in June 2017, ranked Canada’s federal public service as top overall; Canada was also rated fourth in the integrity index, after New Zealand, Sweden and Norway.6 Since then, however, serious questions about the independence and integrity of Canada’s federal public service have arisen.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF for Liberal Party of Canada
    REGULATED FUNDRAISING EVENT REPORT Section A – Party information Party's full name Liberal Party of Canada Chief agent's full name The Federal Liberal Agency of Canada Section B – Event information Event held during a general election period Yes No Event date yyyy/mm/dd 2019/09/17 Event start time 6:00 PM Event name An Evening with the Hon. David Lametti and Marc Miller Venue name Buffet Roma City Saint-Léonard Prov./Terr. QC Postal code H1R 2S4 Section C – Contribution or payment amount Amount of contributions required to have been made to attend the event $ 0-500 Amount required to have been paid to attend the event, part of which was a contribution $ 500 Section D – Beneficiaries Entity A – Registered party B – Registered association C – Nomination contestant D – Candidate E – Leadership contestant Full name Ville-Marie -- Le Sud-Ouest -- Ile-des-Soeurs Federal Liberal Association Entity Full name Entity Full name Entity Full name Entity Section E – Prominent attendees Position: A – Party leader B – Party interim leader C – Leadership contestant D – Cabinet minister Full name David Lametti Position Full name Position Full name Position Full name Position Full name Position Section F – Organizers Full name Ville-Marie -- Le Sud-Ouest -- Ile-des-Soeurs Federal Liberal Association Full name Full name Full name Full name Section G – Privacy notice Personal information in this Regulated Fundraising Event Report (Report) is collected for the administration of the political financing requirements as set out in the Canada Elections Act (Act). This information may be shared with the Commissioner of Canada Elections to ensure that the Act is complied with and enforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Planning and Education of Adult Immigrants in Canada
    London Review of Education DOI:10.18546/LRE.14.2.10 Volume14,Number2,September2016 Language planning and education of adult immigrants in Canada: Contrasting the provinces of Quebec and British Columbia, and the cities of Montreal and Vancouver CatherineEllyson Bem & Co. CarolineAndrewandRichardClément* University of Ottawa Combiningpolicyanalysiswithlanguagepolicyandplanninganalysis,ourarticlecomparatively assessestwomodelsofadultimmigrants’languageeducationintwoverydifferentprovinces ofthesamefederalcountry.Inordertodoso,wefocusspecificallyontwoquestions:‘Whydo governmentsprovidelanguageeducationtoadults?’and‘Howisitprovidedintheconcrete settingoftwoofthebiggestcitiesinCanada?’Beyonddescribingthetwomodelsofadult immigrants’ language education in Quebec, British Columbia, and their respective largest cities,ourarticleponderswhetherandinwhatsensedemography,languagehistory,andthe commonfederalframeworkcanexplainthesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthetwo.These contextualelementscanexplainwhycitiescontinuetohavesofewresponsibilitiesregarding thesettlement,integration,andlanguageeducationofnewcomers.Onlysuchunderstandingwill eventuallyallowforproperreformsintermsofcities’responsibilitiesregardingimmigration. Keywords: multilingualcities;multiculturalism;adulteducation;immigration;languagelaws Introduction Canada is a very large country with much variation between provinces and cities in many dimensions.Onesuchaspect,whichremainsacurrenthottopicfordemographicandhistorical reasons,islanguage;morespecifically,whyandhowlanguageplanningandpolicyareenacted
    [Show full text]
  • Inuit and the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement: Supporting Canada's
    INUIT AND THE NUNAVUT LAND CLAIMS AGREEMENT: SUPPORTING CANADA’S ARCTIC SOVEREIGNTY Terry Fenge Although the ice-strengthened navy patrol vessels to be deployed from Ikpiarjuk on Baffin Island are an important component of Canada's Arctic sovereignty strategy, there is more than one way to skin a cat, says Terry Fenge, formerly with the Inuit Circumpolar Conference Canada. The federal government should involve the Inuit in Canada's Arctic sovereignty, as supported by provisions in the 1993 Nunavut Land Claims Agreement dealing with monitoring and offshore management, he says. Yet, these have not been implemented, and Ottawa seems to have forfeited the opportunity to use them to shore up sovereignty. “[E]ngaging the region’s Inuit with a view to jointly ensuring that the obligations, duties, and objectives of the Nunavut, Inuvialuit, Nunavik and Nunatsiavut Land Claims Agreement are fulfilled,” he says, is key to the Integrated Northern Strategy, promised in the recent Throne Speech. Parmi les éléments clés de la souveraineté du Canada dans l’Arctique figure le déploiement dans cette région de navires à coque renforcée. Mais il y a plus d’une façon de parvenir à ses fins, estime Terry Fenge, ex-directeur de la recherche du Conseil circumpolaire inuit du Canada. Le gouvernement fédéral devrait ainsi intégrer les Inuits à la défense de notre souveraineté dans l’Arctique, d’autant plus que les dispositions touchant la surveillance et la gestion en mer de l’Accord sur les revendications territoriales du Nunavut de 1993 donnent corps à nos prétentions. Mais ces clauses n’ont toujours pas été mises en application, et Ottawa semble avoir renoncé à les utiliser à des fins d’affirmation de sa souveraineté.
    [Show full text]