Jihad A. Hachem, Et Al. V. General Electric Inc., Et Al. 17-CV-08457

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jihad A. Hachem, Et Al. V. General Electric Inc., Et Al. 17-CV-08457 Case 1:17-cv-08457-JMF Document 83 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JIHAD A. HACHEM, LEAD CASE: No. 17-CV-8457 (JMF) Hon. Jesse M. Furman Plaintiff, v. CLASS ACTION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, JEFFREY R. IMMELT, JEFFREY S. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED BORNSTEIN, JOHN L. FLANNERY, JAMIE MILLER, AND KEITH S. SHERIN, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS Case 1:17-cv-08457-JMF Document 83 Filed 04/10/18 Page 2 of 284 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. NATURE OF THE ACTION ............................................................................................ 2 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ...................................................................................... 12 III. PARTIES ......................................................................................................................... 12 A. Lead Plaintiff .......................................................................................................... 12 B. Defendants .............................................................................................................. 13 IV. CONTROL PERSON ALLEGATIONS.......................................................................... 16 V. COMPANY BACKGROUND ........................................................................................ 18 A. GE Capital ............................................................................................................... 18 B. GE Power ................................................................................................................ 19 VI. SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS ................................................................................. 21 A. Background of GE Capital’s LTC Insurance Exposure .......................................... 21 1. The Genworth Spin-Off ................................................................................. 22 2. GE Retained and Reinsured the Worst Blocks of its LTC Business in Connection with the Genworth Spin-off .................................................... 24 3. ERAC and UFLIC Reinsurance Subsidiaries ................................................ 29 4. GE Capital’s SIFI Designation and the GE Capital Exit Plan ....................... 31 5. During the Class Period, Members of GE’s Board of Directors and GE’s Senior Management Oversaw the Adequacy and Effectiveness of GE Capital’s Risk Management Functions ......................... 36 B. Defendants Knew or Recklessly Disregarded the Stale Assumptions and Inadequate LTC Reserve Situation at GE Capital ............................................ 38 C. GE Failed to Set Appropriate LTC Reserves in Violation of GAAP and SEC Regulations .............................................................................................. 51 1. Defendants Violated GAAP by Failing to Properly Calculate and Update GE’s LTC Reserves ........................................................................... 57 (a) Summary of LTC Reserve Charges ...................................................... 59 i Case 1:17-cv-08457-JMF Document 83 Filed 04/10/18 Page 3 of 284 (b) GAAP Applicable to LTC Reserves ..................................................... 60 (c) Benefit Reserve Assumptions Are “Locked-In” When Policies Are Issued, but Should Be Unlocked When Assumptions Change ............................................................................ 64 2. GE Tells Investors that its Claims Experience Was Different from Other LTC Insurers, Until 2017 ..................................................................... 65 3. Adverse LTC Experience Was Known to Defendants by at Least 2015................................................................................................................ 66 (a) GE’s New Disclosures Also Reveal That Adverse LTC Experience Was Systemic Before 2017 ................................................ 68 4. GE Failed to Adequately Increase its LTC Reserves as Trends and Assumptions in the LTC Market Drastically Changed and GE’s Peers in the LTC Market Increased Their LTC Reserves .............................. 69 (a) Genworth............................................................................................... 70 (b) Other LTC Insurers Were Reporting Adverse Claims Experience ............................................................................................. 72 (c) HHS Study Examines Why Insurers Were Leaving the LTC Market ................................................................................................... 73 (d) In 2015, Moody’s Assessed the Credit Impact of the Adverse Experience Widely Reported in the LTC Industry ............................... 74 (e) Recent Studies Confirm Adverse Experience in LTC Market .............. 75 5. GE’s Failure to Timely Record Increases its LTC Reserves Was Exacerbated by its Failure to Disclose the Enormous Exposure in its LTC Portfolio ............................................................................................ 75 6. GE Failed to Provide the Most Basic Disclosures Required by GAAP Regarding its LTC Reserves .............................................................. 75 7. GE Failed to Disclose the Risks and Uncertainties Associated With its LTC Exposure in its MD&A ..................................................................... 78 8. GE Also Improperly Excluded LTC Commitments From its Disclosure of Contractual Obligations ........................................................... 80 9. GE Violated Additional GAAP Provisions and SEC Regulations by Failing to Appropriately Account for and Disclose its LTC Reserves ......................................................................................................... 81 ii Case 1:17-cv-08457-JMF Document 83 Filed 04/10/18 Page 4 of 284 (a) GE’s Accounting Errors Should Result in a Restatement .................... 84 D. GE’s Statutory LTC Reserves Were More Severely Understated than Even its GAAP LTC Reserves ........................................................................ 86 1. ERAC and UFLIC’s Statutory Financial Statements ..................................... 86 2. An Analysis of Ceding Companies’ LTC Experience Forms Reveals Significant Deficiencies in GE’s LTC Active Life Reserves and Disabled Life Reserves and Worsening Trends ....................... 90 (a) Actual Incurred Claims ......................................................................... 90 (b) GE’s Active Life Reserves Were Materially Understated due to Stale Morbidity and Persistency Assumptions ................................. 92 (c) GE Failed to Properly Update the Projection Assumptions Used in its Annual Asset Adequacy Testing......................................... 93 E. GE Violated GAAP and Employed Unsustainable Business Practices to Record Revenue and Earnings on its LTSAs and to Conceal the Truth About its Contract Asset Balance ............................................. 94 1. Background on GE’s LTSAs and Contract Assets ........................................ 96 2. GE’s Unsustainable Reliance on Cumulative Catch-Up Adjustments and its Impact on GE’s Contract Asset Balance ....................... 99 3. The “Black Box” of GE’s Contract Assets .................................................. 105 4. GE’s Accounting for Contract Assets Violated GAAP ............................... 111 (a) GE Failed to Implement Adequate Internal Controls to Ensure GAAP was Appropriately Applied to Contract Assets ........... 114 (b) GE Used Monetization and Cumulative Catch-up Adjustments to Mask the Declines in the Power Segment and Manipulate GE’s Earnings and Cash Flow ......................................... 118 (c) GE Failed to Provide Adequate Disclosure Regarding Contract Assets ................................................................................... 124 F. Defendants Also Failed to Disclose a Known Trend or Uncertainty at GE ..................................................................................................................... 131 G. GE Failed to Maintain Adequate Internal Controls Over its Financial Reporting ............................................................................................... 132 (a) GE’s SOX 404 Assertions .................................................................. 133 iii Case 1:17-cv-08457-JMF Document 83 Filed 04/10/18 Page 5 of 284 (b) GE’s SOX 302 Certifications .............................................................. 136 (c) GE’s “Audit” Personnel Were Not Competent to Assess LTC Reserves .............................................................................................. 139 (d) Defendants Violated SOX and Relevant SEC Regulations ................ 142 VII. GE’S MATERIALLY FALSE AND MISLEADING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.............................................................................................................. 144 VIII. DEFENDANTS’ ADDITIONAL MATERIALLY FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS AND OMISSIONS REGARDING LTC RESERVES AND CONTRACT ASSETS .................................................................... 149 A. Defendants’ Statements ........................................................................................ 149 1. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2014 .............................................................. 149 2. GE’s February 2, 2015 Letter to the Fed ..................................................... 153 3. Barclays Industrial Select Conference
Recommended publications
  • QCB May Postpone 100% Loan-Deposit Compliance Deadline Amid Liquidity Shortfall Issues
    RBI CHIEF | Page 4 EMISSIONS ISSUE | Page 11 Aft er Rajan, VW ready with who? India $10bn plan; to search on devise fi x later Monday, June 20, 2016 Ramadan 15, 1437 AH EGYPT’S EXPENSIVE GRAIN: Page 3 World’s biggest GULF TIMES wheat buyer seen sowing confusion, BUSINESS reaping higher costs Gradual increase in QCB overnight QCB may postpone 100% deposit rate is ‘assumed’: MDPS loan-deposit compliance By Pratap John Chief Business Reporter Given the expected rate hikes by the Federal Reserve in the near term and the nature of the monetary policy under the Qatar Central Bank’s deadline amid liquidity (QCB) commitment to the exchange rate peg, a gradual increase in the QCB overnight deposit rate is assumed, the Ministry of Development Planning and Statistics (MDPS) has said. As Qatar’s currency is pegged to the US dollar, it has appreciated in both nominal and real effective terms since the middle of 2014, reducing imported shortfall issues: MDPS inflationary pressures, MDPS has said in its latest Qatar Economic Outlook (QEO) 2016-18. By Santhosh V Perumal The report said the nominal effective exchange rate Business Reporter (NEER) captures movements in bilateral exchange rates, weighted by respective volumes of trade flows. The NEER provides an accurate measure of iquidity issues may force the Qa- how the Qatari riyal is valued against the currencies tar Central Bank (QCB) to postpone of its major trading partners. The real effective Lthe deadline for compliance to 100% exchange rate (REER) adjusts for differential inflation loan-to-deposit ratio by one year to the end among its counterparts.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Bloomberg Terminal User Guide
    Press the <HELP> key twice for instant Helpx2 live assistance. bloomberg.com Frankfurt New York Singapore +49 69 9204 1210 +1 212 318 2000 +65 6212 1000 Hong Kong San Francisco Sydney +852 2977 6000 +1 415 912 2960 +61 2 9777 8600 London São Paulo Tokyo GETTING +44 20 7330 7500 +55 11 3048 4500 +81 3 3201 8900 The BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL service, BLOOMBERG Data and BLOOMBERG Order Management Systems (the “Services”) are owned and distributed locally by Bloomberg Finance L.P. (“BFLP”) and its subsidiaries in all jurisdictions other than Argentina, Bermuda, China, India, STARTED Japan and Korea (the “BLP Countries”). BFLP is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bloomberg L.P. (“BLP”). BLP provides BFLP with all global marketing and operational support and service for the Services and distributes the Services either directly or through a non-BFLP subsidiary in the BLP Countries. BLOOMBERG, BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL, BLOOMBERG MARKETS, BLOOMBERG NEWS, BLOOMBERG ANYWHERE, BLOOMBERG TRADEBOOK, BLOOMBERG BONDTRADER, BLOOMBERG TELEVISION, BLOOMBERG RADIO, BLOOMBERG PRESS and BLOOMBERG.COM are trademarks and service marks of BFLP or its subsidiaries. ©2007 Bloomberg Finance L.P. All rights reserved. 26443337 1107 10006030 02 The Bloomberg Keyboard Keyboard and Navigation 04 Creating a Login Name and Password 06 Finding Information Autocomplete and the <HELP> Key 06 The Global Help Desk: 24/7 Interact with the Bloomberg Help Desk 08 Broad Market Perspectives Top Recommended Functions 09 Analyzing a Company Basic Functions for Bonds and Equities 10 Communication The BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL® Service Message System 11 Tips, Tricks, and Fun 12 Customer Support If you are not using a Bloomberg-provided keyboard, press the Alt + K buttons simultaneously to view an image of your keyboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic United Investment Trust Annual Report
    CATHOLIC UNITED INVESTMENT TRUST ANNUAL REPORT (AUDITED) December 31, 2015 CATHOLIC UNITED INVESTMENT TRUST TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 1-2 Statement of Assets and Liabilities 3-4 Schedule of Investments: Money Market Fund 5-7 Short Bond Fund 8-11 Intermediate Diversified Bond Fund 12-21 Opportunistic Bond Fund 22-27 Balanced Fund 28-38 Value Equity Fund 39-41 Core Equity Index Fund 42-48 Growth Fund 49-52 International Equity Fund 53-56 Small Capitalization Equity Index Fund 57-73 Statements of Operations 74-76 Statements of Changes in Net Assets 77-79 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 80-92 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 93-95 Crowe Horwath LLP Independent Member Crowe Horwath International INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Members of the Board of Trustees and Unit-holders of Catholic United Investment Trust Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Catholic United Investment Trust – Money Market Fund, Short Bond Fund, Intermediate Diversified Bond Fund, Opportunistic Bond Fund, Balanced Fund, Value Equity Fund, Core Equity Index Fund, Growth Fund, International Equity Fund, and Small Capitalization Equity Index Fund (the “Trust”), which comprise the statement of assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2015, the schedule of investments as of December 31, 2015, the related statements of operations and statements of changes in net assets for the periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the financial highlights for the periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related notes to the financial statements. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Impact Report 2 Contents Approach Reducing Our Emissions Supporting Climate Action Investing in Our People Driving Social Change
    Contents Approach Reducing our emissions Supporting climate action Investing in our people Driving social change Approach Message from Mike 03 About this report 04 About Bloomberg L.P. 05 Governance 06 Stakeholder engagement 07 Risk management 08 Climate scenario analysis 10 Materiality assessment 14 Sustainability strategy 16 COVID-19 spotlight The business of resilience 18 Environmental impact Reducing our emissions 21 Supporting climate action 30 Social impact Investing in our people 44 Driving social change 51 2020 Impact Report 2 Contents Approach Reducing our emissions Supporting climate action Investing in our people Driving social change Message from Mike. Despite the enormous challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, the world is well-positioned to take great steps forward in the fight against climate change. Governments are eager to respond to the fallout from the pandemic in ways that Our company has increased the environmental, social and governance (ESG) data make their economies stronger, more sustainable and more resilient. Business leaders and research we provide, and we have also introduced products to help clients better recognize the risks they face and understand that the same steps that cut carbon assess climate-related risks and opportunities, including new sustainability scores. emissions also help to spur growth and promote stability. The public wants power In 2020, we launched Bloomberg Green, the world’s definitive news source sources that won’t poison the air they breathe. And markets increasingly favor clean dedicated to the business, science and technology of climate change. energy over fossil fuels as the cost of renewable power continues to drop. Virtually all of our company’s profits go to fund the work of Bloomberg Philanthropies The year ahead can set the stage for a decade of transformational change — but only and, in 2020, our foundation expanded our efforts to drive action on climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Note
    Introductory Note: Section 58 of the New Zealand Superannuation and Retirement Income Act 2001 requires that the Guardians must invest the Fund on a prudent, commercial basis, and in a manner consistent with best-practice portfolio management. The Guardians have determined that this requires broad diversification of investments. The Fund’s investment strategy includes holding investments benchmarked to global market indices. On 30 June 2011, the Fund’s portfolio held over 6000 listed companies, providing diversification across most of the world’s countries and industries. The Table below sets out our direct exposure to listed companies, by country of exposure. Country of exposure is defined as location of the ultimate global parent's place of incorporation, except in the case of tax haven countries, where we instead look to the place of business for the headquarters of the ultimate global parent. The Fund also has indirect exposure to other companies through total return swaps linked to market indices and through investment in pooled funds. As the Fund increases in value, both the number of securities and the average size of each holding tend to increase. Security Name Value in New Zealand Dollars Australia Abacus Property Group 32,897 Acrux Ltd 36,391 Adelaide Brighton Ltd 101,165 AGL Energy Ltd 1,957,445 Alesco Corp Ltd 19,809 Alkane Resources Ltd 28,026 Alumina Ltd 145,456 Amcor Ltd 255,625 AMP Ltd 4,032,208 Ansell Ltd 116,456 APA Group 131,716 APN News & Media Ltd 2,829,583 Aquila Resources Ltd 84,275 ARB Corp Ltd 32,632 Ardent Leisure
    [Show full text]
  • H-1B Petition Approvals for Initial Benefits by Employers FY07
    NUMBER OF H-1B PETITIONS APPROVED BY USCIS FOR INITIAL BENEFICIARIES FY 2007 Approved Employer Petitions INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED 4,559 WIPRO LIMITED 2,567 SATYAM COMPUTER SERVICES LTD 1,396 COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS US CORP 962 MICROSOFT CORP 959 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED 797 PATNI COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 477 US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES LLC 416 I-FLEX SOLUTIONS INC 374 INTEL CORPORATION 369 ACCENTURE LLP 331 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 324 ERNST & YOUNG LLP 302 LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED 292 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 283 GOOGLE INC 248 MPHASIS CORPORATION 248 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO 246 AMERICAN UNIT INC 245 JSMN INTERNATIONAL INC 245 OBJECTWIN TECHNOLOGY INC 243 DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP 242 PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHS 238 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 236 MOTOROLA INC 234 MARLABS INC 229 KPMG LLP 227 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO 224 TECH MAHINDRA AMERICAS INC 217 VERINON TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LTD 213 THE JOHNS HOPKINS MED INSTS OIS 205 YASH TECHNOLOGIES INC 202 ADVANSOFT INTERNATIONAL INC 201 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND 199 BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 196 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 192 POLARIS SOFTWARE LAB INDIA LTD 191 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 191 EVEREST BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC 190 IBM CORPORATION 184 APEX TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC 174 NEW YORK CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 171 SOFTWARE RESEARCH GROUP INC 167 EVEREST CONSULTING GROUP INC 165 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA 163 GSS AMERICA INC 160 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 158 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 151 MASCON GLOBAL CONSULTING INC 150 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 149 THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY 147 STANFORD UNIVERSITY 146 COLUMBIA
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release Ceg Media Contacts Bnef Media
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 21, 2010 CEG MEDIA CONTACTS Ken Locklin Lewis Milford Clean Energy Group Clean Energy Group C 703-476-1561 P 802-223-2554 [email protected] C 802-238-4023 [email protected] BNEF MEDIA CONTACT Jill Goodkind Bloomberg LP +1 212 617 3669 [email protected] SHEPHERDING CLEAN ENERGY PROJECTS THROUGH THE “VALLEY OF DEATH” Washington, June 21, 2010—A new report issued by Clean Energy Group (CEG) and Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) undertakes a much-needed evaluation of current gaps in clean energy financing, offering recommendations to address the so-called commercialization “Valley of Death” financing shortfall that occurs before a clean energy technology can achieve commercial viability. The findings, based on analysis of interviews with more than five dozen industry thought-leaders and underlined with quantitative research from Bloomberg New Energy Finance’s Intelligence database, are contained in the white paper “Crossing the Valley of Death: Solutions to the next generation clean energy project financing gap.” Clean Energy Group, with the support of The Annenberg Foundation, commissioned Bloomberg New Energy Finance to join in the study, which examines the shortage of capital for clean energy technologies that require extensive and expensive field-testing before being deployed. Clean Energy Group and Bloomberg New Energy Finance conducted over 60 open-ended interviews with technologists, entrepreneurs, project developers, venture capitalists, institutional investors, bankers and policymakers from 10 countries across the globe to provide solutions on how to address the “Valley of Death” phenomenon. Ken Locklin, Clean Energy Group’s director of finance and investment, said, “This study presents some exciting new approaches to overcome this Valley of Death financing challenge that we should explore further.
    [Show full text]
  • New Solar Research Yukon's CKRW Is 50 Uganda
    December 2019 Volume 65 No. 7 . New solar research . Yukon’s CKRW is 50 . Uganda: African monitor . Cape Greco goes silent . Radio art sells for $52m . Overseas Russian radio . Oban, Sheigra DXpeditions Hon. President* Bernard Brown, 130 Ashland Road West, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Notts. NG17 2HS Secretary* Herman Boel, Papeveld 3, B-9320 Erembodegem (Aalst), Vlaanderen (Belgium) +32-476-524258 [email protected] Treasurer* Martin Hall, Glackin, 199 Clashmore, Lochinver, Lairg, Sutherland IV27 4JQ 01571-855360 [email protected] MWN General Steve Whitt, Landsvale, High Catton, Yorkshire YO41 1EH Editor* 01759-373704 [email protected] (editorial & stop press news) Membership Paul Crankshaw, 3 North Neuk, Troon, Ayrshire KA10 6TT Secretary 01292-316008 [email protected] (all changes of name or address) MWN Despatch Peter Wells, 9 Hadlow Way, Lancing, Sussex BN15 9DE 01903 851517 [email protected] (printing/ despatch enquiries) Publisher VACANCY [email protected] (all orders for club publications & CDs) MWN Contributing Editors (* = MWC Officer; all addresses are UK unless indicated) DX Loggings Martin Hall, Glackin, 199 Clashmore, Lochinver, Lairg, Sutherland IV27 4JQ 01571-855360 [email protected] Mailbag Herman Boel, Papeveld 3, B-9320 Erembodegem (Aalst), Vlaanderen (Belgium) +32-476-524258 [email protected] Home Front John Williams, 100 Gravel Lane, Hemel Hempstead, Herts HP1 1SB 01442-408567 [email protected] Eurolog John Williams, 100 Gravel Lane, Hemel Hempstead, Herts HP1 1SB World News Ton Timmerman, H. Heijermanspln 10, 2024 JJ Haarlem, The Netherlands [email protected] Beacons/Utility Desk VACANCY [email protected] Central American Tore Larsson, Frejagatan 14A, SE-521 43 Falköping, Sweden Desk +-46-515-13702 fax: 00-46-515-723519 [email protected] S.
    [Show full text]
  • National Pension Reserve Fund Annual Report 2010
    -9% 23% Annual Report and Financial Statements 2010 Treasury Building, Grand Canal Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Telephone: (353 1) 664 0800 Fax: (353 1) 664 0890 30 June 2011 Mr. Michael Noonan, T.D., Minister for Finance, Government Buildings, Upper Merrion Street, Dublin 2 Dear Minister, I have the honour to submit to you the Report and Accounts of the National Pensions Reserve Fund Commission for the year ended 31 December 2010. Yours sincerely, Paul Carty, Chairman National Pensions Reserve Fund Commission Annual Report and Financial Statements 2010 Annual Report and Financial Statements Financial and Report Annual Annual Report and Financial Statements 2 National Pensions Reserve Fund Commission Annual Report and Financial Statements 2010 Contents REPORT From the Chairman 4 Annual Report and Financial Statements Key Facts and Figures 6 Fund Overview 7 Directed Investments 9 Investment Strategy Review 11 Market Review 15 Performance 17 Portfolio Review 19 Responsible Investment 26 Risk, Oversight and Controls 29 Fees and Expenses 30 Current Commissioners 31 Fund Governance 32 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Commission Members and Other Information 38 Investment Report 39 Statement of Commission’s Responsibilities 40 Statement on the System of Internal Financial Control 41 Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General 43 Accounting Policies 44 Fund Account 46 Net Assets Statement 47 Administration Account 48 Notes to the Accounts 49 Annual Report and Financial Statements PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS Portfolio of Investments 70 Glossary 112 National Treasury Management Agency – Corporate Information 113 3 National Pensions Reserve Fund Commission Annual Report and Financial Statements 2010 From the Chairman The structure of the National Principal developments Pensions Reserve Fund The principal developments during 2010 were: (“NPRF” or “the Fund”) and Annual Report and Financial Statements Financial and Report Annual the outlook for its future have In respect of the Discretionary Portfolio: significantly changed over the – the Commission agreed an updated investment past year.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PLAINTIFF, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR Plaintiff, VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, JEFFREY R. IMMELT, JEFFREY S. BORNSTEIN, JOHN L. FLANNERY, and JAMIE MILLER, Defendants. Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, alleges the following based on personal knowledge as to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s own acts, and upon information and belief as to all other matters based upon the investigation conducted by and through Plaintiff’s attorneys, which included, among other things, a review of Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings by General Electric Company (“General Electric” or the “Company”), as well as conference call transcripts and media and analyst reports about the Company. Plaintiff believes that substantial evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. INTRODUCTION 1. This is a class action brought on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of General Electric between December 15, 2016 and November 10, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”). The action is brought against General Electric and certain of the Company’s current and former senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”) for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule
    [Show full text]
  • EXAMINATION REPORT of GENWORTH LIFE and ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY Richmond, Virginia As of December 31, 2018
    EXAMINATION REPORT of GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY Richmond, Virginia as of December 31, 2018 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION BUREAU OF INSURANCE P.O. BOX 1157 SCOTT A. WHITE RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23218 COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE 1300 E. MAIN STREET STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 BUREAU OF INSURANCE TELEPHONE: (804) 371-9741 www.scc.virginia.gov/boi I, Scott A. White, Commissioner of Insurance of the Commonwealth of Virginia, do hereby certify that the annexed copy of the Examination Report of Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company, as of December 31, 2018, is a true copy of the original report on file with this Bureau. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed to the original the seal of the Bureau at the City of Richmond, Virginia this 5th day of June 2020 ______________________________ Scott A. White Commissioner of Insurance (SEAL) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Scope of the Examination...................................................................................... 1 History ................................................................................................................... 2 Management and Control ...................................................................................... 3 Transactions with Affiliates .................................................................................. 7 Territory and Plan of Operation ............................................................................ 9 Growth of the Company .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What's Important to You?
    annual report 2007 report annual what’s important to you? what’s genworth financial, Inc. annual report 2007 best friend personal best perfect harmony life’s pleasures great ideas tomorrow’s masterpieces The things you keep and hold dear are a good indication of what’s important – what you want to protect and nurture, and what inspires you to dream. Jason Macdonald, Tralee Neville and their best friend, Kaine. Ontario, Canada home, sweet home Jason Macdonald, Tralee Neville and Kaine were enjoying life in their first home. Then a tragic highway accident forced Jason to go on disability. Fortunately, they were able to keep their home, thanks in part to Genworth’s homeowner assistance program. “After my accident, we were worried we wouldn’t be able to pay our mortgage anymore. Thanks to the help of our bank and Genworth, we were able to make the payments more affordable. It was a big help for Tralee and me, and Kaine.” A first home – a joy, a celebration. And a dream for so many people. We help make that dream a reality around the world. 8 3,772,000 Home loans insured by Genworth (policies in force as of 12/31/07) 333,600 Europe and Other Markets 982,300 1,390,000 United States of America Australia 1,066,100 Canada Making HoMeownersHip possible Mortgage insurance – a safe, secure way to buy a home and begin to achieve financial security. A global leader in mortgage insurance, Genworth Financial has a track record of developing innovative and affordable products that help people achieve the dream of homeownership.
    [Show full text]