DOCSLIB.ORG

UC Berkeley Earlier Faculty Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC Berkeley Earlier Faculty Research UC Berkeley Earlier Faculty Research Title Market Opportunities and Barriers to Transit-Based Development in California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2c01z5hw Authors Cervero, Robert Bernick, Michael Gilbert, Jill Publication Date 1994-08-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Market Opportunities and Barriers to Transit-Based Development in California Robert Cervero Michael Bernick Jill Gilbert Working Paper UCTC No. 223 The University of California Transportation Center University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 The U~iversity of California Transportation Center The University of California Center activities, Researchers Transportation Center (UCTC) at other universities within the is one of ten regional units region also have opportunities mandated by Congress and to collaborate with UCfaculty established in Fall 1988 to on selected studies. support research, education, and training in surface trans- UCTC’seducational and portation. The UCCenter research programs are focused serves federal Region IX and on strategic planning for is supported by matching improving metropolitan grants from the U.S. Depart- accessibility, with emphasis ment of Transportation, the on the special conditions in California Department of Region IX. Particular attention Transportation (Caltrans), and is directed to strategies for the University. using transportation as an instrument of economic Based on the Berkeley development, while also ac- Campus, UCTCdraws upon commodatingto the region’s existing capabilities and persistent expansion and resources of the Institutes of while maintaining and enhanc- Transportation Studies at ing the quality of Iife there. Berkeley, Davis, h’vine, and Los Angeles; the Institute of The Center distributes reports Urban and Regional Develop- on its research in working ment at Berkeley; and several papers, monographs, and in academic departments at the reprints of published articles° Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, and It also publishes Access, a Los Angeles campuses. magazine presenting sum- Faculty and students on other maries of selected studies. For University of California a list of publications in print, campuses may participate in write to the address below. Universityof California Transportation Center 108 NavalArchitecture Building Berkeley, California 94720 Tel: 510/643-7378 FAX:510/643-5456 Thecontents of this reportreflect the viewsof the author whois responsible for the facts and accuracyof the data presentedherein. Thecontents do not necessarilyreflect the official viewsor policies of the State of Californiaor the U,S. Departmentof Transportation.This report doesnot constitute a standard, specification,or regulation. Market Opportunities and Barriers to Transit-Based Development in California Robert Cervero Michael Bernick Jill Gilbert Institute of Urban and Regional Development University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 WorkingPaper August 1994 UCTCNo. 223 TheUniversity of California TransportationCenter Universityof Californiaat Berkeley University of California Transit Research Program This paper was produced with support from the California Department of Transportation through the University of California Transportation Center. Table of Contents Introduction 1 , 2. Background: Transit-Based Developmentin California 1 3. Opportunities for Transit-Based Developmentin California 3 3.1. Market-Demographic Trends 3 3.2. Physical Assets 5 :5.3. Institutional and Regulatory Factors 7 o Examples of Leveraging Residential DevelopmentUsing Transit AgencyLand 8 4.1. Almaden Lake Village 10 ,4.2. Grand Central Apartments 10 Case Study of Station Area Planning and Implementation: . Pleasant Hill BARTStation 15 Barriers to Transit-Based Developmentin California 17 . 7. Economic Obstacles 19 7.1. Questionable Market Viability 19 7.2. Lack of Conventional Financing 22 7.3. Costs 23 7o3.1 Construction Costs 23 7.3.2. Land Costs 23 7.3.3. DevelopmentFees and Regulations 24 7.3.4. Risk-Associated Costs 25 Political Obstacles 26 . 8.1. Localism 26 8.2. NIMBYism 26 9. Structural Obstacles 30 9ol. Lack of Land 3I 9.2. Unsuitability of Land 31 9.3. Inexperience and Lack of Prototypes 31 10. Overcoming Barriers 32 10.1. OvercomingEconomic and Financial Barriers 32 10.1.1. Transit and RedevelopmentAgency Initiatives 32 10.1.2. Other Financial Initiatives 36 10.2. OvercomingPolitical Obstacles 37 10.3. OvercomingStructural Barriers 39 11. Achieving Transit-Based Development 39 11.1. Opportunities Winning Out Over Obstacle 39 11.2. An Action Agenda 40 References 44 MarketOpportunities and Barriers to Transit-Based Developmentin California Robert Cervero, Michael Bernick, and Jill Gilbert 1. Int:roduction Urbanrail transit continues to expandin Los Angeles,Sacr~-aento, San Diego,and the San FranciscoBay Area as these areas seek to improveregional mobility, reduceair pollution, and restruc- ture urban growth. Transit, of course, only producesmobility and environmentalbenefits if people switchfrom cars to trains andbuses. Manyfactors, however,are erodingtransit’s ridership base, includ- ing rapid suburbanization,much of it focusedon highwaycorridors. Nationwide,transit ridership fell from6.4 percent of all commutetrips in 1980to 5.3 percent in 1990(Pisarski, 1992). Whiletransit trips rose in absolute numbersin California between1980 and 1990(one of the few states wherethis was the case), transit’s share of commutetrips droppedin all metropolitanareas: greater Los Angelesm5.4 per- cent to 4.8 percent; San FranciscoBay Area-- 11.9 percent to 10 percent; San Diego--3.7 percent to 3.6 percent; and Sacramento--3.7 percent to 2.5 percent. Giventhat billions of dollars havealready been invested in urbanrail transit in California and billions moreare in the pipelines, these trends are worrisome.California policymakersmust respond creatively to reverse transit’s downwarddecline. Oneoption is to create attractive living, working, and shoppingenvironments around stations. Recentresearch showsresidents living near rail stations in California are about five times morelikely to commuteby rail transit as those living awayfrom rail transit (Cervero,1993). This report investigates the marketopportunities and barriers to transit-based developmentin California. A combinationof field research, informantinterviews, and literature surveyswere used in identifying marketopportunities and barriers. Particular attention has been placed on the opportunities for focusinghousing development near rail stations, as well as the barriers that stand in the way.Since housingconstruction around rail stations has beenfairly sluggishin recent years andin manysettings non-existent, barriers and deterrents appear to be far greater than opportunities. Accordingly,more attention is given in this report to factors that haveretarded housingdevelopment to date, and howthey mighl: be overcome. 2. Background: Transit-Based Development in California Interest in clustering housingand commercialdevelopment around rail transit stations has gained momentumin recent years. Rail transit agencies like the BayArea Rapid Transit (BART)District and San Diego’s Metropolitan Transit DeveIopmentBoard (MTDB) see an opportunity to jointly develop land holdingsaround stations, includingpark-and-ride lots, in associationwith private real-estate devel- opers, hopefully earninglease income and generating new patronage in the process. In recent years, BART has workedwith local redevelopmentauthorities in developing Iand around several stations; to date, joint development deals have led to the construction of mid-rise housing and mixed-use complexeson land near the E1 Cerrito del Norte and Pleasant Hill BARTstations. Rising land values and pressures for affordable housing have prompted BARTand local redevelopment agencies to seriously consider converting parts of their vast inventory of park-and-ride lots arid open parcels to mid-rise housing. These projects maybe harbingers of "transit villages" at other BARTstations, as was envisaged when BARTwas originally conceived over 40 years ago (Johnston arid Tracy, 1983). Plenty of building activity can also be found around other rail stations in California as well. In MountainView, several multi-family projects near the CalTrain station are planned, including an apart- ment complex with 700 units at the Old Mill Shopping Center. S~ta Clara County’s light rail stations have attracted several "trandominium"housing projects that rely on rail proximity as an important mar- ket toolo As part of Santa Clara County’s Housing Initiative Program, plans are underwayto eventu- ally build over 13,700 units of moderate-densityhousing (at 12 to 40 dwelling units per acre) near light rail stations. San Diego has already seen a flurry of apartment construction along the new El Cajon extension, including more than 500 modernapartment units recently built adjacent to the La Mesa- AmayaStation. Developersare not being strong-armed into building these transit-based projects. All are willing participants, seeing art opportunity to fill a new market niche-- providing moderately priced housing with superb regional accessibility. Local governmentshave also emergedas important players in promot- ing transit-based developmentin California. The cities of Hayward,Union City, E1 Cerrito, and Pleasant Hill have recently formed redevelopment districts around BARTstations for the very purpose of jump- starting new development. E1 Cerrito’s redevelopment authority has used tax-exempt financing and subsidies for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CENTRAL Total ±295,426 SF
    SANTA CLARA 2770-2890 De La Cruz Boulevard @CENTRAL Total ±295,426 SF Virtual Slideshow Availability Update Kelly Yoder Brandon Bain Bob Simpson Steve Horton +1 408 615 3427 +1 408 615 3416 +1 408 615 3421 +1 408 615 3412 LIC#: 01821117 LIC#: 01308375 LIC#: 01240540 LIC#: 01127340 REAL ESTATE PARTNERS SANTA CLARA Project Highlights @CENTRAL • Five-building high-image Office/R&D project totaling ±295,426 SF • Transformative project upgrades and renovations complete • Extensive exterior façade modifications with progressive image • State-of-the-art tech open ceiling and drop ceiling environments • Prominent corner location with excellent identity • Tremendous building and monument signage opportunities • Expansive asset with options for future growth • Energized collaboration areas dedicated to each building • Dock and grade level loading opportunities • SVP power savings between 27%-35% over PG&E SANTA CLARA 2800 de la cruz CENTRAL (1-Story) @ Full Building 18,717± sf 2830 de la cruz (3-Story) First Floor 23,639± sf Second Floor 31,588± sf Third Floor 31,549± sf Contiguous / divisible Option Second/Third Floors 63,137± sf Full Building 86,776± sf updated MAY 2019 SANTA CLARA Location @CENTRAL Milpitas W Caribbean Dr 237 W Tasman Dr Great Mall Lafayette St 2858 2860 2890 2830 Central Expressway 237 Tasman Dr 2800 Oakland Rd 2770 Ellis St S Whisman Rd 101 De La Cruz Blvd • Excellent access to Interstate 880 Montague Exwy and Highways 101 & 87 Central ExwyMathilda Ave 880 237 SANTA CLARA • Convenient access to San Jose Scott Blvd International
    [Show full text]
  • BLUE LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    BLUE LINE light rail time schedule & line map Baypointe View In Website Mode The BLUE LINE light rail line (Baypointe) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Baypointe: 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM (2) Virginia: 12:16 AM - 11:33 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest BLUE LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next BLUE LINE light rail arriving. Direction: Baypointe BLUE LINE light rail Time Schedule 17 stops Baypointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:30 AM - 10:20 PM Monday Not Operational Virginia Station West Virginia Street, San Jose Tuesday Not Operational Children's Discovery Museum Station Wednesday 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM Convention Center Station Thursday 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM 300 Almaden Bl, San Jose Friday 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM San Antonio Station Saturday 12:29 AM - 11:47 PM 200 S 1st St, San Jose Santa Clara Station Fountain Alley, San Jose BLUE LINE light rail Info Saint James Station Direction: Baypointe Stops: 17 Japantown/Ayer Station Trip Duration: 33 min 15 Hawthorne Way, San Jose Line Summary: Virginia Station, Children's Discovery Museum Station, Convention Center Station, San Civic Center Station Antonio Station, Santa Clara Station, Saint James 800 North 1st Street, San Jose Station, Japantown/Ayer Station, Civic Center Station, Gish Station, Metro/Airport Station, Karina Gish Station Court Station, Component Station, Bonaventura North 1st Street, San Jose Station, Orchard Station, River Oaks Station, Tasman Station, Baypointe Station Metro/Airport Station 1740 North First
    [Show full text]
  • VTA Daily News Coverage for Fri., July 5 Through Mon., July 8 1
    From: VTA Board Secretary Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 3:35 PM To: VTA Board Secretary <[email protected]> Subject: From VTA: July 5 and July 8, 2019 Media Clips VTA Daily News Coverage for Fri., July 5 through Mon., July 8 1. Grand jury report blasts VTA for inefficiencies, poor oversight (Mountain View Voice) 2. Opinion: Why BART ridership has declined despite booming economy (Mercury News) 3. High Speed Rail Authority picks SF to SJ, Silicon Valley to Central Valley route (ABC 7 News) 4. Radical thinking needed to solve South Bay traffic woes (Mercury News) Grand jury report blasts VTA for inefficiencies, poor oversight (Mountain View Voice) Report: 'A case can be made for dismantling or phasing out the light rail system altogether' The taxpayer-funded agency in charge of offering transit solutions to Santa Clara County's traffic jams is currently embroiled in a mess of its own. The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), the multi-billion dollar agency that plans and operates the county's road and transit network, has been called out as one of the most inefficient organizations of its kind. A new county Civil Grand Jury report released last month found that VTA is spending more and accomplishing less than nearly every other comparable transit agency in the United States. Just over the last decade, the cost of running VTA's buses and light rail system has nearly doubled, mainly due to labor costs. Meanwhile, fewer riders appear to be using VTA transit services than they have in the last 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Route(S) Description 26 the Increased Frequency on the 26 Makes the Entire Southwestern Portion of the Network Vastly More Useful
    Route(s) Description 26 The increased frequency on the 26 makes the entire southwestern portion of the network vastly more useful. Please keep it. The 57, 60, and 61 came south to the area but having frequent service in two directions makes it much better, and riders from these routes can connect to the 26 and have much more areas open to them. Thank you. Green Line The increased weekend service on the Green line to every twenty minutes is a good addition of service for Campbell which is seeing markedly better service under this plan. Please keep the increased service. Multiple Please assuage public concerns about the 65 and 83 by quantifying the impact the removal of these routes would have, and possible cheaper ways to reduce this impact. The fact is that at least for the 65, the vast majority of the route is duplicative, and within walking distances of other routes. Only south of Hillsdale are there more meaningful gaps. Mapping the people who would be left more than a half mile (walkable distance) away from service as a result of the cancellation would help the public see what could be done to address the service gap, and quantifying the amount of people affected may show that service simply cannot be justified. One idea for a route would be service from winchester transit center to Princeton plaza mall along camden and blossom hill. This could be done with a single bus at a cheaper cost than the current 65. And nobody would be cut off. As far as the 83 is concerned, I am surprised the current plan does not route the 64 along Mcabee, where it would be eq..
    [Show full text]
  • San Jose Campus Map Rev2-9 Pg1.Ai
    N San Jose Main Campus MR-3 W E MR-1 McCarthy Ranch S 237 680 . Dr B a 237 lew r Bel ber r. M D c Ln C 24 . nology a 237 ch r ters t r D h Headqua r. Te y y a 23 B Dr. W Z M l r s v 25 e r an u r. Site 5 r D d lg e p t . ke h o r groM mac a y u 880 H r S 21 u r R q a 22 R n ad d c 20 B . h He . Al a y R de r d r ber aW egdi aW D N . r . 1 y Renais sanc a . kw 3 . r e n F P 6 32 31 D L D i 4 5 n r. ta rst e a n n S nt 2 30 m r. o t 7 s A . oi a lderD M p Site 4 28 T a y E d 29 e t a Ta E s 9 11 s i m I B 8 an Site 5.1 V J 10 12 D 680 . r. W Tasm r. a D Center Rd. n K an D Site 2 m H r. as Cisc 15 20 c Z G F Champion Ct. T CYS r. E L E a e D b n 13 16 or 880 P k o m . a B r. r e c a D W y a D r 17 S B D n e r R a a O b M C m nt u W as y Site 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Grading California's Rail Transit Sta on Areas Appendix LEGEND
    ! Grading California's Rail Transit Sta3on Areas Appendix LEGEND: CONTENTS: Group 1 - Residen<al • BART Final Scores • LA Metro Final Scores Group 2 - Mixed • Sacramento RT Final Scores • San Diego MTS Final Scores • San Francisco MUNI Final Scores Group 3 - Employment • Santa Clara VTA Final Scores A+ 95% A 80% A- 75% B+ 70% B 55% B- 50% C+ 45% C 30% C- 25% D+ 20% D 5% D- 2% F below 2% Appendix | www.next10.org/transit-scorecard Next 10 ! BART FINAL SCORES AVERAGE: C Final City Line Sta3on Raw Score Grade San SFO-MILLBRAE Civic Center/UN Plaza BART 90.60 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Montgomery St. BART 88.20 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE 24th St. Mission BART 87.30 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE 16th St. Mission BART 84.30 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Powell St. BART 84.10 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Embarcadero BART 83.80 A Francisco Oakland FREMONT Lake Merri] BART 77.60 A DUBLIN/PLEASANTON Berkeley Downtown Berkeley BART 74.50 A TO DALY CITY Berkeley RICHMOND Ashby BART 75.30 A- Berkeley RICHMOND North Berkeley BART 74.30 A- San SFO-MILLBRAE Glen Park BART 74.10 A- Francisco Oakland FREMONT Fruitvale BART 73.50 A- Oakland SFO-MILLBRAE 19th St. Oakland BART 72.90 B+ San SFO-MILLBRAE Balboa Park BART 69.80 B+ Francisco 12th St. Oakland City Center Oakland SFO-MILLBRAE 71.70 B BART Contra Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Costa SFO-MILLBRAE 66.20 B Centre BART Centre Appendix | www.next10.org/transit-scorecard Next 10 ! Oakland PITTSBURG/BAY POINT MacArthur BART 65.70 B Fremont FREMONT Fremont BART 64.20 B El Cerrito RICHMOND El Cerrito Plaza
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRAL Total ±18,717 SF
    SANTA CLARA 2800 De La Cruz Boulevard @CENTRAL Total ±18,717 SF Virtual Slideshow Availability Update Steve Horton Brandon Bain Bob Simpson Kelly Yoder +1 408 615 3412 +1 408 615 3416 +1 408 615 3421 +1 408 615 3427 LIC#: 01127340 LIC#: 01308375 LIC#: 01240540 LIC#: 01821117 REAL ESTATE PARTNERS SANTA CLARA Project Highlights @CENTRAL • Five-building high-image Office/R&D project totaling ±295,426 SF • Transformative project upgrades and renovations complete • Extensive exterior façade modifications with progressive image • Prominent corner location with excellent identity • Tremendous building and monument signage opportunities • Expansive asset with options for future growth • Energized collaboration areas dedicated to each building • SVP power savings between 27%-35% over PG&E SANTA CLARA BUILDING Highlights @CENTRAL • Premier creative single-story freestanding building • Highly visible building with tremendous identity • Market Ready lobby, break area, and restroom core • Private outdoor amenity area with tranquil environment • Indoor and outdoor collaboration area w/roll-up door connection • Open ceiling tech environment w/15’ 4” floor to ceiling height • Potential grade level loading opportunities • Ample Power: 400 Amps @ 120/208 Volt (Upgradable to 800 Amps) SANTA CLARA Location @CENTRAL Milpitas W Caribbean Dr 237 W Tasman Dr Great Mall Lafayette St 2858 2860 2890 2830 Central Expressway 237 Tasman Dr 2800 Oakland Rd 2770 Ellis St S Whisman Rd 101 De La Cruz Blvd Montague Exwy Central ExwyMathilda Ave 880 • Excellent access to
    [Show full text]
  • Working BB.Indd
    Builders Bulletin Bidding This Week... OCTOBER 21, 2019 Bid Date Bid Time Location Project Name 2:00 PM 10/21/19 Gilroy Rfp Fuel Station Secondary Containment Components Repairs Corp Yard - City Of Gilroy 10/21/19 3:00 PM Santa Clara Serra Tanks Rehabilitation Project - City Of Santa Clara 11:00 AM Santa Clara Baseball Field Turf Replacement Mission College - Wvmcd NEW 10/22/19 4:00 PM Los Altos Rfp Complete Streets Master Plan - City Of Los Altos 10/22/19 3:00 PM Paso Robles Heritage Ranch Community Services District - Photovoltaic (Pv) System 10/22/19 5:00 PM 10/22/19 Gilroy Rfp 2020 Park Patrol Security Program Multi-Year Contract- City Of Gilroy 2:00 PM Monterey General Municipal Building Improvements Joc 2019 For Pmsa Projects 10/22/19 2:00 PM Monterey Citywide Curb Ramp Project - Phase 1 10/22/19 10:00 AM 10/22/19 San Luis Obispo Fermentation Sciences Institute - Bid Package #3 - Landscaping And Irrigation (Ntb Only) 2:00 PM 10/22/19 San Jose Rfq Directional Drilling, Repair & Replacement Of Electrical Conduit - City Of San Jose 2:00 PM 10/23/19 Mountain View Charleston Road Crossing At Permanente Creek Trail - City Of Mountain View 10/23/19 12:00 PM Grover Beach Rfq - Cbdg Capital Project Engineering Services * 10/23/19 2:00 PM Milpitas Repaving Of City Hall Complex - City Of Milpitas * 10/23/19 2:00 PM Milpitas Repaving Of Public Works & Police Department Complex - City Of Milpitas * 10/23/19 2:00 PM Milpitas Repaving Fire Station No.
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Southbound Weekday Schedule Corded
    Caltrain Southbound Weekday Schedule Unpaged Herb underseal her genizah so scornfully that Arnie garrote very concurrently. Subaural and thickening Shaun centralises her Flagstad width terrified and misuse insanely. Wriggly Alston suit or staked some springtides Jacobinically, however discoidal Denny methodizes afire or ridiculing. Signing in the caltrain southbound weekday schedule this time they ride free on the time of the newest homes available now in effect until further notice Enter a customer onboard requests the following schedules only nine of mostly uninsured patients, at the tamien and filter. Gilroy and does vta has equipped all buses may depart up to san francisco and southbound schedule and other travelers. Cards cannot use your saved places can be in to stations. Through the lawrence caltrain corridor between the tamien and others. In to caltrain southbound weekday trains have been added on sunday. Way with limited commute service from san francisco fireworks show the latest job openings across the report. Affected by the street, and online schedules and will be secured. An unprecedented and agree to gilroy area air quality management district are unknown and san jose diridon and mission area. Regular weekday train but ride free translation assistance is to and account. Survey conducted last train service and southbound schedule will stop at them, amtrak guest rewards promotions and will be much of tamien has equipped all weekend service. Connect do so as a means of stations. Bullet trains have read and agree to the following schedules. Near by southern santa clara county riders, independence day after thanksgiving day christmas day of the northbound.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.0 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation
    SECTION 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION INTRODUCTION This introduction explains why the analysis in a General Plan PEIR may be different than a similar discussion in an EIR prepared for a development project. It also discusses how the “existing conditions” were determined for this PEIR and how impacts and mitigations are described. Why Long-term Comprehensive Plan-level Impacts Are Not Described as Existing + Project This PEIR includes a description of existing conditions in the City of San José, currently an urban city of almost one million people encompassing 143 square miles and over 500 miles of roadway. In each of the impact discussions where it is possible to do so, the impact of the project (under future conditions) is compared to existing conditions. CEQA BASELINE The transportation section, for example, identifies the There has been substantial discussion conditions that are anticipated to exist in 2035, when the recently among planning and proposed General Plan (the “project”) is assumed to be transportation professionals about the implications of a 2010 court case fully implemented. Wherever possible, the future involving the baseline for CEQA conditions are analyzed using typical professional analyses of transportation criteria (such as screenlines or average speeds) at improvements. The case in question strategic locations, and the findings are compared to [Sunnyvale West Neighborhood Association v. Sunnyvale Council existing conditions in order to put the plan into a current th [(2010) Cal. App. 4 ,1351]
    [Show full text]
  • 376 Martin Avenue Santa Clara, California
    376 Martin Avenue Santa Clara, California 237 To Milpitas To Fremont FOR LEASE To Mountain View To S.F. Jun N c t o i r o t h n Z Montague Expwy. F a A i n r v s k e t e . St. r 880 D R pwy. e L d . a 101 Cru z d. oa R mble Tri San Tomas Ex e. Av ot rc d. d ha R r C w a a v PROPERTY k Street e l Bro e u t o B z fayet M a a rt in De LaCru De A L v e 87 n To Gilroy u e Reed Street San Jose The Alameda International Nor Coleman Ave. Airport t h F 17 o urth St. To Santa Cruz FREESTANDING ±6,893 SQ. FT. 100% OFFICE PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS: • Market Ready Interiors w/ Contemporary High-Image Finishes • ±420 sq. ft. Storage Area • Superior Indoor Air Quality through high Efficiency Air Filtration • 14’ Clear Height • Abundant Natural Light through Skylight and Windows • 9 Privates / 2 Large Conference Rooms • Lighting Controls & Low Flow Plumbing • Server Room with 4 Tons of Dedicated Air • Security System w/ Card Key Access • Kitchenette • Approximately 23 Parking Spaces (Plus On-Street Parking) • Exterior Security Cameras • Secured Private Rear Yard • Do Not Disturb Tenants - Tour by Appointment Only Sutton Roley Mike Baker 300 Santana Row, Fifth Floor Senior Director Director San Jose, CA 95128 +1 408 615 3433 +1 408 615 3406 main +1 408 615 3400 [email protected] [email protected] fax +1 408 615 3444 LIC #00793235 LIC #01884037 cushmanwakefield.com Cushman & Wakefield Copyright 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEN LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    GREEN LINE light rail time schedule & line map Old Ironsides - Winchester View In Website Mode The GREEN LINE light rail line (Old Ironsides - Winchester) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Baypointe Station (E): 10:16 PM (2) Civic Center Station (N): 12:36 AM - 11:43 PM (3) Old Ironsides Station (W): 5:59 AM - 10:46 PM (4) San Jose Diridon: 5:27 AM - 11:49 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest GREEN LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next GREEN LINE light rail arriving. Direction: Baypointe Station (E) GREEN LINE light rail Time Schedule 17 stops Baypointe Station (E) Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday Not Operational Diridon Station Tuesday Not Operational San Fernando Station 415 San Fernando St, San Jose Wednesday 10:16 PM Convention Center Station Thursday 10:16 PM 300 Almaden Bl, San Jose Friday 10:16 PM San Antonio Station Saturday Not Operational 200 S 1st St, San Jose Santa Clara Station Fountain Alley, San Jose GREEN LINE light rail Info Saint James Station Direction: Baypointe Station (E) Stops: 17 Japantown/Ayer Station Trip Duration: 34 min 15 Hawthorne Way, San Jose Line Summary: Diridon Station, San Fernando Station, Convention Center Station, San Antonio Civic Center Station Station, Santa Clara Station, Saint James Station, 800 North 1st Street, San Jose Japantown/Ayer Station, Civic Center Station, Gish Station, Metro/Airport Station, Karina Court Station, Gish Station Component Station, Bonaventura Station, Orchard North 1st Street,
    [Show full text]