DOCSLIB.ORG

Ever Wonder Why?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ever Wonder Why? Ever Wonder Why? EVER WONDER WHY? and Other Controversial Essays Thomas Sowell HOOVER INSTITUTION PRESS Stanford University Stanford, California The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, founded at Stanford University in 1919 by Herbert Hoover, who went on to become the thirty-first president of the United States, is an interdisciplinary research center for advanced study on domestic and international affairs. The views expressed in its publications are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Overseers of the Hoover Institution. www.hoover.org Hoover Institution Press Publication No. 548 Copyright ᭧ 2006 by Thomas Sowell All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher. First printing, 2006 1312111009080706987654321 Manufactured in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992. ࠗϱ Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the Library of Congress ISBN 0-8179-4752-3 Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t mean to do harm—but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves. T. S. Eliot Contents Preface xiii part i: the culture wars Ever Wonder Why? 3 Animal Rites 6 “Us” or “Them”? 9 Twisted History 12 Explaining to the Grand Kids 15 Human Livestock 18 The Wright Stuff 21 The Legacy of Eric Hoffer 24 One-Uppers versus Survival 27 The Equality Dogma 30 The Inequality Dogma 33 Equality, Inequality, and Fate 36 Hiroshima 39 The Tyranny of Visions 42 The Tyranny of Visions: Part II 45 The Tyranny of Visions: Part III 48 The Immigration Taboo 51 The Left Monopoly 54 I Beg to Disagree 57 4th Estate or 5th Column? 60 part ii: economic issues Why Economists Are Not Popular 65 Housing Hurdles 68 The “Cost” of Medical Care 71 viii Contents Subsidies Are All Wet 74 A Taxing Experience 77 Profits without Honor 80 Profits without Honor: Part II 83 Two Earthquakes 86 Peter Bauer (1915–2002) 89 Journalists and Economics 92 Stock Crash Aftermath 95 Milton Friedman at 90 98 “Price Gouging” in Florida 101 Economic “Power” 104 A Relic of the Recent Past 107 Who Can Afford It? 110 Free-Lunch Medicine 113 Free-Lunch Medicine: Part II 116 Free-Lunch Medicine: Part III 119 Manufacturing Confusion 122 A Cold Shower 125 An Old “New Vision” 128 Third World Sweatshops 131 Third World Sweatshops: Part II 134 Privatizing Social Security 137 Privatizing Social Security: Part II 140 “Living Wage” Kills Jobs 143 A Happy Birthday? 146 part iii: legal issues Calculated Confusion 151 Judges and Judgment 154 Justice for Little Angelo 157 Property Rites 160 Property Rites: Part II 163 Property Rites: Part III 166 Contents ix Foreign Law Is Not Law 169 Medical Lawsuits 172 Fixing the Jury System 175 Half a Century after Brown 178 Half a Century after Brown: Part II 181 Half a Century after Brown: Part III 184 Umpires, Judges, and Others 187 Big Business and Quotas 190 The Grand Fraud 193 The Grand Fraud: Part II 196 The Grand Fraud: Part III 199 The Grand Fraud: Part IV 202 Saving Quotas 205 The High Cost of Nuances 208 The Polio Fallacy 211 part iv: political issues Spoiled Brat Politics 217 Spoiled Brat Politics: Part II 220 The “Compassion” Racket 223 Ronald Reagan (1911–2004) 226 Gun Control Myths 229 Gun Control Myths: Part II 232 A Painful Anniversary 235 The High Cost of Shibboleths 238 “Why Do They Hate Us?” 241 Foreign “Allies” 244 My Platform 247 The Oldest Fraud 250 The Left’s Vision 253 The Left’s Vocabulary 256 Abstract People 259 Looking Back 262 x Contents part v: social issues Mealy Mouth Media 267 Achievements and Their Causes 270 Talkers versus Doers 273 Talkers versus Doers: Part II 276 Liberals and Class 279 Liberals and Class: Part II 282 Liberals and Class: Part III 285 The Autism “Spectrum” 288 The High Cost of Busybodies 291 The High Cost of Busybodies: Part II 294 The High Cost of Busybodies: Part III 297 The High Cost of Busybodies: Part IV 300 “Partial Truth” Abortion 303 Lying about Yosemite 306 Growing Old 309 April Fools’ Party 312 part vi: education issues Choosing a College 317 The Idiocy of “Relevance” 320 Julian Stanley and Bright Children 323 For What Purpose? 326 School Performances 329 School Performances: Part II 332 School Performances: Part III 335 College Admissions Voodoo 338 Summer De-Programming 341 Fat in California’s Budget 344 A Scary Report 347 “Teaching to the Test” 350 “Teaching to the Test”: Part II 353 Contents xi “Teaching to the Test”: Part III 356 Smart “Problems” 359 Vouchers Vindicated 362 Artificial Stupidity 365 “Good” Teachers 368 A Sign of the Times 371 Suspicious Stats 374 Peers and Pied Pipers 377 part vii: racial issues Older Budweiser 383 Rosa Parks and History 386 “Friends” of Blacks 389 “Friends” of Blacks: Part II 392 Recycled “Racism” 395 Dangerous Democracy? 398 Are Cops Racist? 401 Rattling the Chains 404 Roasting Walter Williams 407 “Diversity” in India 410 Race and IQ 413 Race and IQ: Part II 416 Race and IQ: Part III 419 An Old War and a New One 422 Silly Letters 425 Black History Month 428 Bravo for Bill Cosby 431 Quota “Logic” 434 Quota “Logic”: Part II 437 part viii: random thoughts Random Thoughts 443 Preface Many explanations are given for the events of our time and the events in history. One of the most common explanations is that various external circumstances led or forced people to do this or that, and one of the most overlooked explanations is that various internal drives led them to do the things they did, including things that made no sense in terms of the external circumstances. One of these internal drives—especially the desire “to feel important,” in T.S. Eliot’s words—fits many notions and actions that would be hard to explain otherwise. The desire of individuals and groups to puff themselves up by imposing their vision on other people is a recurring theme in the culture wars discussed in the first section of the essays that follow. Such attempts at self-aggrandizement in the name of noble-sounding crusades are too often called “idealism” rather than the narrow ego trip that it is. Right after the section containing essays on culture war issues comes the largest section in this book, on economic issues. The reason for so many essays on economics is not just the importance of the subject itself but also the utter confusion that reigns among the general public, and even among the intelligentsia, over very basic principles of economics—and even very basic words, like “wages,” “taxes,” or the “national debt.” The great Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said that we need education in the obvious more than exploration of the obscure. It is especially important to xiv Preface explain economics so plainly that it becomes obvious because so many in politics and the media have created so much confusion in the process of spinning issues to fit their own agendas. Those who want a complete introduction to the subject can read my Basic Economics but the essays here simply try to clarify particular misconceptions on particular issues. A wide range of legal, social, racial, and educational issues are dealt with in the other sections of this book. All of these essays first appeared as syndicated columns carried in newspapers across the country. As such, they had to be readable and concise, and they often dealt with issues that were in the news. However, from the large number of these columns written over the past few years I have selected for publication here those columns which deal with issues of continuing relevance and interest. While I take responsibility for all the conclusions reached in these essays, I must also acknowledge the work of others that made these writings possible. First of all, there is my research assistant, Na Liu, whose insights as well as diligence have enabled me to discuss the wide range of topics covered in these columns with a background of knowledge to draw on. She has been very ably assisted by the dedicated work of Elizabeth Costa. All this is made possible by the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, where we are all employed and which has generously supported our research. Finally, I must acknowledge the contribution of Karen Duryea, my editor at Creators Syndicate, who has caught many a typographical or grammatical error in my columns, as well as inadvertent misstatements, saving me from public embarrassment. While many serious issues are discussed in these pages, Preface xv sometimes there is also a little humor, without which it would be hard to face many of life’s realities. Thomas Sowell Hoover Institution Stanford University PART I THE CULTURE WARS Ever Wonder Why? When you have seen scenes of poverty and squalor in many Third World countries, either in person or in pictures, have you ever wondered why we in America have been spared such a fate? When you have learned of the bitter oppressions that so many people have suffered under, in despotic countries around the world, have you ever wondered why Americans have been spared? Have scenes of government-sponsored carnage and lethal mob violence in countries like Rwanda or in the Balkans ever made you wonder why such horrifying scenes are not found on the streets of America? Nothing is easier than to take for granted what we are used to, and to imagine that it is more or less natural, so that it requires no explanation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Books, Documents, Speeches & Films to Read Or
    Books, Documents, Speeches & Films to Read or See Roger Ream, Fund for American Studies Email: [email protected], Website: www.tfas.org Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FB0EhPM_M4 American documents & speeches: Declaration of Independence The Constitution Federalist Papers The Anti-Federalist Washington’s Farewell Address Jefferson 2nd Inaugural Address Gettysburg Address Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death speech of Patrick Henry Ronald Reagan’s Time for Choosing speech (1964) Barry Goldwater’s Acceptance Speech to the 1964 Republican Convention First Principles The Law, Frederic Bastiat A Conflict of Visions, Thomas Sowell Libertarianism: A Reader, David Boaz Libertarianism: A Primer, David Boaz Liberty & Tyranny, Mark Levin Anarchy, State and Utopia, Robert Nozick The Constitution of Liberty, F.A. Hayek Conscience of a Conservative, Barry Goldwater What It Means to Be a Libertarian, Charles Murray Capitalism and Freedom, Milton Friedman Free Market Economics Economics in One Lesson, Henry Hazlitt Eat the Rich, P.J. O’Rourke Common Sense Economics: What Everyone Should Know about Wealth & Prosperity: James Gwartney, Richard Stroup and Dwight Lee Free to Choose, Milton Friedman Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith Capitalism, Socialism & Democracy, Joseph Schumpeter Basic Economics: A Citizen’s Guide to the Economy, Thomas Sowell Human Action, Ludwig von Mises Principles of Economics, Carl Menger Myths of Rich and Poor, W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm The Economic Way of Thinking, 10th edition, Paul Heyne, Peter J. Boettke, David L. Prychitko Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media…, John Stossel Other books of importance: The Road to Serfdom, F.A.
    [Show full text]
  • “Black Lives Matter” Movement Heather Mac Donald Author, the War on Cops
    A PUBLICATION OF HILLSDALE COLLEGE ImpOVERr 3,400,000imi READERS MONTHLYs April 2016 • Volume 45, Number 4 The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement Heather Mac Donald Author, The War on Cops HEATHER MAC DONALD is the Thomas W. Smith Fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor of City Journal. She earned a B.A. from Yale University, an M.A. in English from Cambridge University, and a J.D. from Stanford Law School. She writes for several newspapers and journals, including The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The New Criterion, and Public Interest, and is the author of three books, including Are Cops Racist? and The War on Cops: How The New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe (forthcoming June 2016). The following is adapted from a speech delivered on April 27, 2016, at Hillsdale College’s Allan P. Kirby, Jr. Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship in Washington, D.C., as part of the AWC Family Foundation Lecture Series. For almost two years, a protest movement known as “Black Lives Matter” has convulsed the nation. Triggered by the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, in August 2014, the Black Lives Matter movement holds that racist police officers are the greatest threat facing young black men today. This belief has triggered riots, “die-ins,” the murder and attempted murder of police officers, a campaign to eliminate traditional grand jury proceedings when police use lethal force, and a presi- dential task force on policing. Even though the U.S. Justice Department has resoundingly disproven the lie that a pacific Michael Brown was shot in cold blood while trying to surrender, Brown is still Imprimis_April16_8pg.indd 1 4/22/16 11:14 AM HILLSDALE COLLEGE: PURSUING TRUTH • DEFENDING LIBERTY SINCE 1844 APRIL 2016 • VOLUME 45, NUMBER 4 < hillsdale.edu venerated as a martyr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloody Crossroads African-Americans and the Bork Nomination: a Bibliographic Essay J
    Howard University Digital Howard @ Howard University Selected Speeches J. Clay Smith, Jr. Collection 1-11-1992 Bloody Crossroads African-Americans and The Bork Nomination: A Bibliographic Essay J. Clay Smith Jr. Follow this and additional works at: http://dh.howard.edu/jcs_speeches Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Smith, J. Clay Jr., "Bloody Crossroads African-Americans and The Bork ominN ation: A Bibliographic Essay" (1992). Selected Speeches. Paper 151. http://dh.howard.edu/jcs_speeches/151 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the J. Clay Smith, Jr. Collection at Digital Howard @ Howard University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Selected Speeches by an authorized administrator of Digital Howard @ Howard University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 173 "Bloody Crossroads" AFRICAN-AMERICANS and the BORK NOMINATION: A BIBLIOGRAPHIC ESSAY J. Clay Smith, Jr.* Two diverging traditions in the mainstream of Western political thought-one "liberal," the other "conservative"-have competed, and still_ compete, for control of the democratic process and of the American constitutional system; both have controlled the direction of our judicial policy at one time or another. - Alexander M. Bicke11 The clash over my nomination was simply one battle in-this long-running war for control of our legal culture. - Robert H. Bork2 On July 1, 1987 President Ronald Reagan announced his nomination of Judge Robert H. Bork to succeed Justice Lewis Powell * Professor of Law, Howard University School of Law. Alexander M. Bickel, The Morality Of Consent 3 (1975), hereafter, Morality Of Consent. 2 Robert H. Bork, The Tempting of America The Political Seduction of the Law 2 (1990), hereafter, Tempting of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Three out of Four Economists Recommend Raising the Minimum Wage! a Closer Look at the Debate Surrounding Seattle’S Minimum Wage Ordinance
    Three Out of Four Economists Recommend Raising the Minimum Wage! A Closer Look at the Debate Surrounding Seattle’s Minimum Wage Ordinance Erica Bergmann* CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 594 I. DEBATING THE HARMS OF A MINIMUM WAGE ................................. 596 A. The Effect on Employment is Not Compelling Evidence in the Debate .............................................................................................. 597 B. Technological Innovation Gives Regulating Wages Even Greater Importance ........................................................................................ 600 C. Economic Rights, Human Rights, and the Right to a Living Wage .......................................................................................................... 601 D. Higher Wages Support the Economy and Relieve the Burden on Public Assistance Programs ............................................................. 603 II. SEATTLE’S GRAND EXPERIMENT: THE LAW AND THE CONTROVERSY .............................................................................................................. 605 A. The Nitty-Gritty Details of Seattle’s Minimum Wage Ordinance Phase-In Schedule ............................................................................ 605 B. The IFA’s Position Regarding Franchises and the Ordinance .... 607 C. City of Seattle’s Position Regarding Franchises and the Ordinance .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ED309204.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 309 204 UD 026 853 AUTHOR O'Neill, June; And Others TITLE The Economic Progress of Black Men in America. Clearinghouse Publication 91. INSTITUTION Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Oct 86 NOTE 166p. AVAILABLE FROMUnited States Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, DC 20425. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DErCRIPTORS *Black Employment; Blacks; Civil Rights Legislation; *Economically Disadvantaged; *Education Work Relationship; Equal Opportunities (Jobs); Labor Market; *Males; Multivariate Analysis; *Racial Differences; Racial Discrimination; Research Proposals; *Salary Wage Differentials; Unemployment IDENTIFIERS '.*Economic Equity ABSTRACT This report attempts to identify and analyze the causes of the differences between the earnings and employment of black males and white males. Although the earnings gap between black and white men was substantially reduced between 1940 and 1980, black men still earn less than white men. While the relative earnings of black men has risen since 1940, their relative employment has declined. Factors that influence the earnings gap include the following: (1) discrimination; (2) education; (3) region of residence; (4) industrial sector; and (5) marital status. The report finds that while a narrowing of racial differences in worker characteristics accounts for part of the earnings convergence, other factors, including declining racial prejudice, federal civil rights policies, and unmeasured changes in employment skills,
    [Show full text]
  • By Thomas Sowell. James D
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 1985 Book Review: Civil Rights: Rhetoric or Reality? by Thomas Sowell. James D. Anderson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, James D., "Book Review: Civil Rights: Rhetoric or Reality? by Thomas Sowell." (1985). Constitutional Commentary. 438. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/438 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CIVIL RIGHTS: RHETORIC OR REALITY? By Thomas Sowell.' New York: William Morrow & Co. 1984. Pp. 164. $11.95. James D. Anderson2 The publication of this book provides an opportunity to as­ sess Sowell's neoconservative ideas on the economics of race and sex. Sowell offers alternative explanations of the historical and contemporary causes of statistical disparities in incomes and occu­ pational status between men and women and among American ethnic groups. He calls for an end to government attempts to in­ crease employment and educational opportunities for minorities, the repeal of minimum wage laws, and the abolition of affirmative action programs. Philosopher Sidney Hook, sociologist Seymour Martin Lip­ set, Walter Laquer of the Center for Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown University, and columnists George F. Will, William Satire, and R. Emmett Tyrell, Jr. have pursued the same ends. Sowell's pet concerns are also issues about which such neoconservative scholars as Nathan Glazer, Diane Ravitch, Rich­ ard B.
    [Show full text]
  • How the New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe
    THE WAR ON COPS HOW THE NEW ATTACK ON LAW AND ORDER MAKES EVERYONE LESS SAFE “This is a book that can save lives.” —THOMAS SOWELL VIOLENT CRIME HAS BEEN RISING threat to young black males. On the contrary, it is SHARPLY IN MANY AMERICAN CITIES criminals and gangbangers who are responsible for AFTER TWO DECADES OF DECLINE. the high black homicide death rate. Homicides jumped nearly The War on Cops exposes the truth about officer use of 17 percent in 2015 in force and explodes the conceit of “mass incarceration.” the largest 50 cities, the A rigorous analysis of data shows that crime, not race, biggest one-year increase drives police actions and prison rates. since 1993. The reason is what Heather Mac Donald The growth of proactive policing in the 1990s, along first identified nationally with lengthened sentences for violent crime, saved as the “Ferguson effect”: thousands of minority lives. In fact, Mac Donald Since the 2014 police argues, no government agency is more dedicated to shooting death of Michael the proposition that “black lives matter” than today’s Brown in Ferguson, data-driven, accountable police department. Missouri, officers have been backing off of proactive policing, and criminals are becoming emboldened. Mac Donald gives voice to the many residents of high- crime neighborhoods who want proactive policing. This book collects and expands on Mac Donald’s She warns that race-based attacks on the criminal- groundbreaking and controversial reporting on the justice system, from the White House on down, are Ferguson effect and the criminal-justice system. It eroding the authority of law and putting lives at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity Agenda Vs. Learning Class Warfare Taxes Threats to Free
    Diversity Agenda Vs. Learning Class Warfare Taxes Threats to Free Speech Online What Will It Take to Control Spending? SPRING 2019 Freedom Is for Everyone N THIS ISSUE, YOU WILL FIND oppressors to the oppressed (primarily racial Heather Mac Donald (p. 16) discussing “the and sexual minorities) is the only just purpose I trashing of Western civilization” on college of politics, and if individual rights get in the campuses. Picking up that theme, Mike Gon- way of that project, then they must be shoved zalez (p. 32) identifies the entitlement state aside. Likewise, GDP growth, debt, deficits, and as a major motivator of those same corrupt- other traditional metrics of good policy matter ing agendas. not when weighed against the imperatives of A few pages away you can find Dan Mitchell equality of condition. (p. 26) employing the concept of deadweight loss In the conservative understanding, the to explain why everybody loses when tax rates preservation of individual liberty is the only are high, and Jonathan Bydlak (p. 21) making the legitimate purpose of government, and limiting case that controlling federal spending requires political power via a constitution of checks and budget process reforms. balances and rights is the means by which liberty Something for everybody—or at least is preserved. everybody who likes bad news. Read in While the conservative concern for conjunction, these articles lead to a dire constitutional rigor may seem distant from summation of our current situation: the everyday struggles of people, it at least has Raising taxes will harm the economy and lead this advantage over the progressive mania for to even more government spending (and deficits equality: It does not create insoluble conflicts and debt); but government spending is already over who is more oppressed than whom.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Racial Profiling a Legitimate Strategy in the Fight Against Violent Crime?
    Philosophia https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-9945-1 Is Racial Profiling a Legitimate Strategy in the Fight against Violent Crime? Neven Sesardić1 Received: 21 August 2017 /Revised: 15 December 2017 /Accepted: 2 January 2018 # Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Racial profiling has come under intense public scrutiny especially since the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement. This article discusses two questions: (1) whether racial profiling is sometimes rational, and (2) whether it can be morally permissible. It is argued that under certain circumstances the affirmative answer to both questions is justified. Keywords Racial profiling . Discrimination . Police racism . Black lives matter. Bayes’s theorem . Base rate fallacy. Group differences 1 Introduction The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement is driven by the belief that the police systematically discriminate against blacks. If such discrimination really occurs, is it necessarily morally unjustified? The question sounds like a provocation. For isn’t it obviously wrong to treat people differently just because they differ with respect to an inconsequential attribute like race or skin color? Indeed, racial profiling does go against Martin Luther King’s dream of a color-blind society where people Bwill not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.^ The key question, however, is whether this ideal is achievable in the real world, as it is today, with some persistent statistical differences between the groups. Figure 1 shows group differences in homicide rates over a 29-year period, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ 2011:3): As we see (the red rectangle), the black/white ratio of the frequency of homicide offenders in these two groups is 7.6 (i.e., 34.4/4.5).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads, Distributed Freedom Professor Abigail Thompson, Chair of Nearly 30,000 Printed Copies, and Have Gone Into
    Then & Now ACTA’s 25-Year Drive to Restore the Promise of Higher Education ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Stephen Joel Trachtenberg Sidney L. Gulick III Board of Directors President Emeritus and University Professor Emeritus Professor of Mathematics, University of Maryland Edwin D. Williamson, Esq., Chairman of Public Service, The George Washington University Robert “KC” Johnson Partner, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP (ret.) Michael B. Poliakoff, Ph.D. Professor of History, CUNY–Brooklyn College Robert T. Lewit, M.D., Treasurer President, ACTA (ex-officio) Anatoly M. Khazanov CEO, Metropolitan Psychiatric Group (ret.) Ernest Gellner Professor of Anthropology Emeritus, John D. Fonte, Ph.D., Secretary & Asst. Treas. Council of Scholars University of Wisconsin; Fellow, British Academy Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute George E. Andrews Alan Charles Kors John W. Altman Evan Pugh University Professor of Mathematics, Henry Charles Lea Professor Emeritus of History, Entrepreneur Pennsylvania State University University of Pennsylvania Former Trustee, Miami University Mark Bauerlein Jon D. Levenson George “Hank” Brown Emeritus Professor of English, Emory University Albert A. List Professor of Jewish Studies, Harvard Divinity School Former U.S. Senator Marc Zvi Brettler Former President, University of Colorado Bernice and Morton Lerner Distinguished Professor of Molly Levine Janice Rogers Brown Judaic Studies, Duke University Professor of Classics, Howard University Former Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Cir. William Cook George R. Lucas, Jr. Former Justice of the California Supreme Court Emeritus Distinguished Teaching Professor and Emeritus Senior Fellow, Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership, Jane Fraser Professor of History, SUNY–Geneseo United States Naval Academy President, Stuttering Foundation of America Paul Davies Joyce Lee Malcolm Heidi Ganahl Professor of Philosophy, College of William & Mary Professor Emerita of Law, George Mason University Fellow of the Royal Historical Society Founder, SheFactor & Camp Bow Wow David C.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Public Radio- FCC Quarterly Programming Report July 1- September 30,2016 KPCC-KUOR-KJAI-KVLA-K227BX-K210AD S
    Southern California Public Radio- FCC Quarterly Programming Report July 1- September 30,2016 KPCC-KUOR-KJAI-KVLA-K227BX-K210AD START TIME DURATION ISSUE TITLE AND NARRATIVE 7/1/2016 Take Two: Border Patrol: Yesterday, for the first time, the US Border patrol released the conclusions of that panel's investigations into four deadly shootings. Libby Denkmann spoke with LA Times national security correspondent, Brian Bennett, 9:07 9:00 Foreign News for more. Take Two: Social Media Accounts: A proposal floated by US Customs and Border Control would ask people to voluntarily tell border agents everything about their social media accounts and screen names. Russell Brandom reporter for The Verge, spoke 9:16 7:00 Foreign News to Libby Denkmann about it. Law & Order/Courts/Polic Take Two: Use of Force: One year ago, the LAPD began training officers to use de-escalation techniques. How are they working 9:23 8:00 e out? Maria Haberfeld, professor of police science at John Jay College of Criminal Justice spoke to A Martinez about it. Take Two: OC Refugee dinner: After 16 hours without food and water, one refugee family will break their Ramadan fast with mostly strangers. They are living in Orange County after years of going through the refugee process to enter the United States. 9:34 4:10 Orange County Nuran Alteir reports. Take Two: Road to Rio: A Martinez speaks with Desiree Linden, who will be running the women's marathon event for the US in 9:38 7:00 Sports this year's Olympics. Take Two: LA's best Hot dog: We here at Take Two were curious to know: what’s are our listeners' favorite LA hot dog? They tweeted and facebooked us with their most adored dogs, and Producers Francine Rios, Lori Galarreta and host Libby Denkmann 9:45 6:10 Arts And Culture hit the town for a Take Two taste test.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 149 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, AUGUST 1, 2003 No. 117 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 2 p.m. Senate FRIDAY, AUGUST 1, 2003 (Legislative day of Monday, July 21, 2003) The Senate met at 9:30 a.m., on the SCHEDULE at about this time—in fact, exactly expiration of the recess, and was called Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, this morn- this time—the odds of completing this to order by the President pro tempore ing the Senate will be in a period for bill, in most people’s minds, was very (Mr. STEVENS). morning business in order that Sen- narrow. Yet both sides of the aisle ators may speak and have an oppor- working together developed an ap- PRAYER tunity to introduce legislation. There proach with which I think everybody is The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- will be no rollcall votes during today’s pleased. It is the important next step fered the following prayer: session. When the Senate completes its in developing a bill that I am confident Let us pray. business today, we will adjourn for the the President will be able to sign short- Eternal Lord God, who is the ‘‘Rock August break. of Ages,’’ You are our shield, and we Today, in addition to Member state- ly after we deliver it to him as a final find refuge in You.
    [Show full text]