2014 Tromso Chess Olympiad Survey – Results

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2014 Tromso Chess Olympiad Survey – Results 2014 Tromso Chess Olympiad Survey – Results The ACP would like to thank all 72 participants of the 2014 Tromso Chess Olympiad survey. We hope your evaluations and thoughts will help FIDE and the organizers of next Olympiads. We have received answers from representatives of 42 national chess federations: Andorra (1), Australia (2), Azerbaijan (1), Bosnia and Herzegovina (1), Brazil (1), Bulgaria (1), Croatia (1), Czech Republic (1), Denmark (4), England (6), Estonia (1), France (1), Georgia (1), Ghana (1), ICCD (1), Iceland (4), India (1), Iran (1), Israel (4), Italy (4), Kyrgyzstan (1), Latvia (1), Lithuania (3), Luxembourg (1), Macedonia (1), Mexico (1), Monaco (1), Netherlands (3), Norway (1), Papua New Guinea (1), Poland (1), Russia (1), Scotland (1), Serbia (1), Slovakia (1), South Africa (1), Spain (1), Sweden (2), Switzerland (1), Ukraine (4), USA (5), Vietnam (1). Among the 72 responders: 41 were Players, 11 were Arbiters, 7 Captains, 6 FIDE Congress Participants, 6 Journalists, 1 Chief of Delegation, 1 Volunteer, 1 Photographer, 1 Member of the Technical Administration Panel, 1 Coach, and 1 Commentator. Remark: The numbers don’t sum up to 72 as some of the participants had more than one function. PART I – Questions related to the organization How would you rate the overall organization of the 2014 Chess Olympiad (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 38% 29% 10% 17% 7% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,18 How would you rate the pre-tournament communication with the organizers? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 29% 10% 25% 25% 12% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 2,96 How would you rate the on-site staff? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 50% 40% 30% 20% 42% 37% 10% 2% 15% 0% 5% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 4,08 How would you rate the competence of the arbiters? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 37% 27% 10% 18% 2% 17% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,43 How would you rate the tournament hall? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 50% 40% 30% 20% 33% 41% 10% 12% 12% 3% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 2,61 How would you rate the tournament restrooms? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 60% 40% 63% 20% 25% 7% 1% 3% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 1,57 How would you rate your hotel room? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 37% 10% 21% 8% 17% 17% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,45 How would you rate food and beverages provided in your hotel? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 50% 40% 30% 20% 44% 32% 10% 11% 0% 6% 7% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 4,01 How would you rate food and beverages provided at the tournament hall? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 34% 32% 10% 22% 8% 0% 5% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,58 How would you rate the Internet accessibility and speed in your hotel? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 35% 10% 23% 13% 14% 15% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,54 How would you rate the provided transportation? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 28% 32% 10% 23% 7% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,68 How would you rate the distance from your hotel to the tournament hall (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 50% 40% 30% 51% 20% 24% 10% 17% 3% 0% 6% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,89 How would you rate the official website? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 35% 32% 10% 23% 0% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,88 How would you rate the security? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 30% 10% 26% 23% 7% 13% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,45 How would you rate the opening ceremony? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 50% 40% 30% 20% 40% 32% 10% 2% 20% 0% 6% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,94 How would you rate the closing ceremony? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 33% 35% 10% 20% 2% 11% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,60 How would you rate the punctuality (of rounds, pairings and other events)? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 50% 40% 30% 20% 45% 43% 10% 0% 0% 12% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 4,31 How would you rate the FIDE Congress organization? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 50% 40% 30% 20% 44% 10% 12% 12% 21% 12% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,09 How would you rate the working conditions (for captains, arbiters, journalists, delegates)? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 34% 32% 10% 4% 19% 11% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,26 How would you rate the anti-computer-assisted- cheating precautions? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 38% 28% 10% 7% 14% 14% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,38 How would you rate the anti-traditional-cheating precautions? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 32% 38% 10% 14% 11% 0% 5% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,34 How would you rate the press center? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 37% 32% 10% 13% 11% 8% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,11 How would you rate the media coverage? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 50% 40% 30% 20% 44% 40% 10% 2% 4% 11% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 4,16 How would you rate the visa assistance? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 36% 29% 10% 21% 7% 7% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 2,93 How would you rate the pre-tournament communication with FIDE? (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) 40% 30% 20% 37% 10% 26% 8% 16% 13% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Average = 3,00 PART II – Questions related to the tournament rules Did you like the time control used at the 2014 Chess Olympiad? (90 minutes for 40 moves, followed by 30 minutes for the rest of the game, with an increment of 30 seconds starting from move 1) 3% 9% Yes Should be faster Should be slower 88% The vast majority of the responders liked the time control used at the 2014 Chess Olympiad in Tromso. Did you like the rule valid at the 2014 Chess Olympiad not allowing players to agree to a draw before move 30? Yes 6% Draw offers should not be allowed at 22% all at Chess Olympiads There should be no such restrictions at Chess Olympiads 6% 66% Required number of moves at Chess Olympiads should be higher Required number of moves at Chess Olympiads should be lower = 0% 2/3 of the responders found the rule used at the 2014 Chess Olympiad in Tromso not allowing players to agree to a draw before move 30 adequate. Players arriving late for a game were being forfeited during the 2014 Chess Olympiad. Did you like that rule? Yes 36% 26% Previous rule when a clock of a player arriving late was being started was better 38% Punishment should be less harsh than in the current rule and more harsh than in the previous rule Only 26% of the responders liked the current rule. Many responders suggested a system of warning(s). Among the responders opting for the old rule many didn’t necessarily prefer to wait a full hour. Did you like the new team composition submission system? 10% Yes No 90% The new team composition submission system used during the 2014 Chess Olympiad in Tromso was warmly welcomed. Were the rules of the competition and duties of captains precisely explained at the Captains’ Meeting? 18% Yes No 82% According to the responders the rules of the competition and duties of captains were precisely explained at the Captains’ Meeting. An attention was brought to the fact that due to problems with the team composition submission for the first round some of the captains were unable to participate in the Captain’s Meeting. Were the rules of the competition and duties of arbiters precisely explained at the Arbiters’ Meeting? 36% Yes 64% No A significant percentage of the responders didn’t think the rules of the competition and duties of arbiters were precisely explained at the Arbiters’ Meeting. Moreover, even among responders evaluating the meeting positively, some of them complained that the meeting was too late, too long, and the microphone didn’t work properly. How would you evaluate the pairing system used at the 2014 Chess Olympiad? Fair and suitable for 22% Olympiads 33% Acceptable 45% Must be changed Less than 1/4 of the responders consider the current pairing system fair and suitable for Olympiads. Still, almost 1/2 consider it acceptable, though many complained the system was too complicated and before the pairing were published it was impossible to predict them. How would you evaluate the tie-break system used at the 2014 Chess Olympiad? Fair and suitable for Olympiads 28% 32% Acceptable 40% Must be changed The opinions were strongly divided. A visible number of responders preferred board points over match points, but it is impossible to say how numerous the group is, as many responders didn’t share a thought on that problem. Should teams registering after the deadline be allowed to participate in Olympiads? 3% Yes, without 21% repercussions Yes, upon a penalty payment 76% No 3/4 of the responders opted for a penalty payment solution if a team is registered after the deadline.
Recommended publications
  • PNWCC FIDE Open – Olympiad Gold
    https://www.pnwchesscenter.org [email protected] Pacific Northwest Chess Center 12020 113th Ave NE #C-200, Kirkland, WA 98034 PNWCC FIDE Open – Olympiad Gold Jan 18-21, 2019 Description A 3-section, USCF and FIDE rated 7-round Swiss tournament with time control of 40/90, SD 30 with 30-second increment from move one, featuring two Chess Olympiad Champion team players from two generations and countries. Featured Players GM Bu, Xiangzhi • World’s currently 27th ranked chess player with FIDE Elo 2726 (“Super GM”) • 2018 43rd Chess Olympia Champion (Team China, Batumi, Georgia) • 2017 Chess World Cup Round 4 (Eliminated World Champion GM Magnus Carlsen in Round 3. Watch video here) • 2015 World Team Chess Champion (Team China, Tsaghkadzor, Armenia) • 6th Youngest Chess Grand Master in human history (13 years, 10 months, 13 days) GM Tarjan, James • 2017 Beat former World Champion GM Vladimir Kramnik in Isle of Man Chess Tournament Round 3. Watch video here • Played for the Team USA at five straight Chess Olympiads from 1974-1982 • 1976 22nd Chess Olympiad Champion (Team USA, Haifa, Israel) • Competed in several US Championships during the 1970s and 1980s with the best results of clear second in 1978 GM Bu, Xiangzhi Bio – Bu was born in Qingdao, a famous seaside city of China in 1985 and started chess training since age 6, inspired by his compatriot GM Xie Jun’s Women’s World Champion victory over GM Maya Chiburdanidze in 1991. A few years later Bu easily won in the Chinese junior championship and went on to achieve success in the international arena: he won 3rd place in the U12 World Youth Championship in 1997 and 1st place in the U14 World Youth Championship in 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations for the Chess Olympiad
    D.II. Chess Olympiad D.II.01 Regulations for the Chess Olympiad 1. General 1.1 The Chess Olympiad is the principal team contest organized by FIDE. 1.1.1 The Olympiad is held regularly at two year intervals in the autumn of the even numbered years (2006, 2008, etc.) 1.1.2 The Olympiad for both the open section and the women section must be held, if possible, at a single venue. 1.1.3 However, in exceptional cases as determined by the FIDE General Assembly or (in between congresses) by the President - separate venues may be used for the men and women contests. 1.1.4 Organizing body: FIDE, represented by the FIDE President. 1.1.5 Administrator 1.1.5.1 The administrator is appointed through a special selection process (section 2 below). 1.1.5.2 The administrator is responsible to FIDE, and must abide by these regulations. 1.1.5.3 The administrator shall make available all necessary premises, staff and funds for the contest. The minimum requirements are laid down in individual sections of these regulations. 1.1.5.4 The administrator may utilize the services of outside bodies or private persons for the purpose of financing and running the contest. 1.1.5.5 Administrators may be proposed by the federations. 1.1.5.6 The President may also receive offers from sponsors outside the sphere of FIDE. 1.1.5.7 The tasks of the administrator are detailed in subsequent sections of these regulations. 1.1.6 FIDE Congress The administrator who undertakes the running of the Chess Olympiad must also undertake to hold the FIDE Congress for the same year.
    [Show full text]
  • Chess Olympiad Selection Criteria
    Chess Olympiad Selection Criteria 2020 Olympiad in Moscow, Russia 1 General 1.1 The Chess Olympiad is the principal team contest organized by FIDE. 1.2 The Olympiad is held at two year intervals of even numbered years (2018, 2020, 2022, etc.). 1.3 The 2020 Olympiad will be held in Moscow, Russia from August 5th to 18th. 1.4 The Olympiad consists of an Open Section and a Women’s Section. 1.5 The national teams of federations affiliated to FIDE shall select its teams as follows: . Open Section: 4 players, 1 reserve . Women’s Section: 4 players, 1 reserve 1.6 Each team shall have a captain (coach), who may also be one of players (or reserve). The duties of the captain will be leadership of the team’s matches and liaison with the Chief Arbiter. 1.7 Not later than five months before the start of the Olympiad, the organizing federation shall send the invitation in its final form to all federations affiliated to FIDE. 1.8 Not later than four months before the start of the tournament, every federation that intends to participate must inform the organizing federation of its acceptance of the invitation. 1.9 At the same time, the federation concerned must pay FIDE the requisite entry fee, failing which the federation shall not be allowed to participate in the Olympiad. 1 | P a g e 1.10 Not later than two months before the start of the tournament, every Federation that has entered must notify the following details to the Administrator: a. name and initials of the Chief of Delegation b.
    [Show full text]
  • Calchess Journal Editor: Denker/Barber Qualifier
    Cal Journal Summer 2014 Grandmaster Sam Shankland Wins Gold Medal at TromsØ Olympiad Chirila and Barbosa Win CalChess State Championship De Guzman Wins Central California Open Aleskerov Wins People’s Tournament Doyle and Byambaa Win Sacramento Championship Cal Journal Summer 2014 Table of Contents CalChess Board Presidents Message ......................................................... 2 President: Tom Langland News .............................................................................. 3 Vice-President: Joe Lonsdale Treasurer:Stephen Shaugnessy GM Sam Shankland Interview ......................... 3 Secretary: Richard Koepcke Recent Events ................................................................... 6 Members at Large: Salman Azhar CalChess State Championship ......................... 6 Ruth Haring Scott Mason Berkeley Chess School Celebration ............... 13 Swaminathan Sankar College Chess Coordinator: Central California Open .................................. 14 Edward Detrick Scholastic Coordinator: People’s Tournament ....................................... 15 Lynn Reed Scholastic Representatives: Mechanics’ Summer Tuesday Marathon ...... 18 Hunter Klotz-burwell Arvind Sankar Sacramento Championship ............................. 19 Emily Zhu CalChess Journal Editor: Denker/Barber Qualifier .................................. 23 Scott Mason Mechanics’ 51st Stamer Memorial .................. 27 Tactic Puzzles from 2014 Olympiad ........................... 28 The CalChess Journal is published periodically by CalChess,
    [Show full text]
  • Chess in Uganda As an Education Tool
    Chess not just a game but a necessity for child intellect development Presented by F.A, F.I, I.O John Vianney Mukalazi Chairman Chess in Schools. Uganda Chess Federation ORIGIN OF CHESS Chess originated from the two-player Indian war game, Chatarung , which dates back to 600 A.D. In 1000 A.D, chess spread to Europe by Persian traders. It was development to make children of the king better generals at the battle field. CHESS? Chess is a brain game played on a 64 square board by two people with the sole aim of trapping the enemy king. Therefore every player must lay a strategy on how to trap the king. UGANDA CHESS HISTORY Chess in Uganda was first played seriously in the 1960s but formal administrative structures for the game were put in place in 1972 with the formation of the Uganda Chess Federation. WORLD SCENE Uganda won its first ever medal in 1982 world chess Olympiad in Switzerland through Mr. Amos Mungyereza (deceased), second medal came to A young prodigy Geoffrey Makumbi at 17yrs won Gold at 17 years on Board six (6) at the Olympiad held in Yerevan, Armenia Currently Uganda is the only country in East and Central Africa with International Masters Why Chess for your child. Chess helps promote intellectual growth and has been shown to improve academy performance. It teaches children to think analytically, logically and on more than one level. It also helps them build up their decision making tools. It educates them to be responsible for the consequences of those decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Emirate of UAE with More Than Thirty Years of Chess Organizational Experience
    DUBAI Emirate of UAE with more than thirty years of chess organizational experience. Many regional, continental and worldwide tournaments have been organized since the year 1985: The World Junior Chess Championship in Sharjah, UAE won by Max Dlugy in 1985, then the 1986 Chess Olympiad in Dubai won by USSR, the Asian Team Chess Championship won by the Philippines. Dubai hosted also the Asian Cities Championships in 1990, 1992 and 1996, the FIDE Grand Prix (Rapid, knock out) in 2002, the Arab Individual Championship in 1984, 1992 and 2004, and the World Blitz & Rapid Chess Championship 2014. Dubai Chess & Culture Club is established in 1979, as a member of the UAE Chess Federation and was proclaimed on 3/7/1981 by the Higher Council for Sports & Youth. It was first located in its previous premises in Deira–Dubai as a temporarily location for the new building to be over. Since its launching, the Dubai Chess & Culture Club has played a leading role in the chess activity in UAE, achieving for the country many successes on the international, continental and Arab levels. The Club has also played an imminent role through its administrative members who contributed in promoting chess and leading the chess activity along with their chess colleagues throughout UAE. “Sheikh Rashid Bin Hamdan Al Maktoum Cup” The Dubai Open championship, the SHEIKH RASHID BIN HAMDAN BIN RASHID AL MAKTOUM CUP, the strongest tournament in Arabic countries for many years, has been organized annually as an Open Festival since 1999, it attracts every year over 200 participants. Among the winners are Shakhriyar Mamedyarov (in the edition when Magnus Carlsen made his third and final GM norm at the Dubai Open of 2004), Wang Hao, Wesley So, or Gawain Jones.
    [Show full text]
  • General Regulations for Competitions
    General Regulations for Competitions 05. FIDE General Regulations for Competitions (GR) Approved by the 1986 General Assembly, 2007 PB Amended by the 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1998, 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 General Assemblies and 2011 Executive Board. Preface All chess competitions shall be played according to the FIDE Laws of Chess (E.I.01A). The FIDE General Regulations for Competitions shall be used in conjunction with the Laws of Chess and shall apply to all official FIDE competitions. These Rules shall also be applied to all FIDE-rated competitions, amended where appropriate. The organisers, competitors and arbiters involved in any competition are expected to be acquainted with these Rules before the start of the competition. In these Rules the words ‘he’, ‘him’ and ‘his’ shall be considered to include ‘she’ and ‘her’. National Laws of the hosting country take precedence over FIDE Rules. 1 Scope 1.1 Where an event has a situation not covered by internal rules, these Rules shall be considered to be definitive. 1.2 These Rules apply to the following levels of competition: L1 – Official FIDE events – see FIDE Handbook, Section D, Regulations for Specific Competitions (World Championships, Chess Olympiad, Continental Championships and so on) L2 - Competitions where FIDE titles and title norms can be earned, according to FIDE Handbook B.01 (FIDE Title Regulations) L3 - FIDE Rated Competitions, according to FIDE Handbook B.02 (FIDE Rating Regulations) 1.3 These competition rules may contain regulations defined by other FIDE Commissions, which are listed in the FIDE Handbook. Where possible, references to these external regulations shall be shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Cossu 160 Draft#1.Pub
    Chesstamp Review #160 (Oct-Dec 2015) COSSU Auction #160 More nice items from Djuka! Suggested bids are set at approximately one half of the catalog value. Please post or e-mail bids to the editor before Mar. 15. As al- ways, the winning bid will be one increment above the next highest bidder. Up to $25: 50 cents Up to $50: $1 Up to $100: $2.50 Above $100: $5 Once again, there are suggested minimum bids. Bids below that amount will be forwarded to the owners for their consideration. North American bidders please add $3 for ship- ping. European bidders should add $10 for shipping. Inquire please if you need/ want registered mail. # 1: YUGOSLAVIA 1950. 9 th Chess Olympiad. Green FDC with RED First day chess postmark and complete set of chess stamps MB $19 #2: YUGOSLAVIA 1950. 9 th Chess Olympiad. White FDC with RED First day chess postmark and complete set of chess stamps MB $19 #3: YUGOSLAVIA 1950. 9 th Chess Olympiad. Both RED and BLACK First day chess postmarks on a postcard with imprinted stamp MB $7 #4: YUGOSLAVIA 1950. 9 th Chess Olympiad. An envelope with address and RED First day chess postmark and a pair of 5 dinar chess stamps. MB $9 #5: SAO PAULO, Brazil, Chess postmark, 19 th Nov.1960. for ZONAL TOURN, on an air mail envelope gone through post. Checkmate No 80. MB $29 #6: MOSCOW 15 th March 1960. Black postmark for WORLD CHESS CHAMPION- SHIP BOTVINIK AND TAL, on a color view card with imprinted postage stamp.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Chess
    Glossary of chess See also: Glossary of chess problems, Index of chess • X articles and Outline of chess • This page explains commonly used terms in chess in al- • Z phabetical order. Some of these have their own pages, • References like fork and pin. For a list of unorthodox chess pieces, see Fairy chess piece; for a list of terms specific to chess problems, see Glossary of chess problems; for a list of chess-related games, see Chess variants. 1 A Contents : absolute pin A pin against the king is called absolute since the pinned piece cannot legally move (as mov- ing it would expose the king to check). Cf. relative • A pin. • B active 1. Describes a piece that controls a number of • C squares, or a piece that has a number of squares available for its next move. • D 2. An “active defense” is a defense employing threat(s) • E or counterattack(s). Antonym: passive. • F • G • H • I • J • K • L • M • N • O • P Envelope used for the adjournment of a match game Efim Geller • Q vs. Bent Larsen, Copenhagen 1966 • R adjournment Suspension of a chess game with the in- • S tention to finish it later. It was once very common in high-level competition, often occurring soon af- • T ter the first time control, but the practice has been • U abandoned due to the advent of computer analysis. See sealed move. • V adjudication Decision by a strong chess player (the ad- • W judicator) on the outcome of an unfinished game. 1 2 2 B This practice is now uncommon in over-the-board are often pawn moves; since pawns cannot move events, but does happen in online chess when one backwards to return to squares they have left, their player refuses to continue after an adjournment.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Perspective Through the Game of Chess
    On the Impact of Information Technologies on Society: an Historical Perspective through the Game of Chess Fr´ed´eric Prost LIG, Universit´ede Grenoble B. P. 53, F-38041 Grenoble, France [email protected] Abstract The game of chess as always been viewed as an iconic representation of intellectual prowess. Since the very beginning of computer science, the challenge of being able to program a computer capable of playing chess and beating humans has been alive and used both as a mark to measure hardware/software progresses and as an ongoing programming challenge leading to numerous discoveries. In the early days of computer science it was a topic for specialists. But as computers were democratized, and the strength of chess engines began to increase, chess players started to appropriate to themselves these new tools. We show how these interac- tions between the world of chess and information technologies have been herald of broader social impacts of information technologies. The game of chess, and more broadly the world of chess (chess players, literature, computer softwares and websites dedicated to chess, etc.), turns out to be a surprisingly and particularly sharp indicator of the changes induced in our everyday life by the information technologies. Moreover, in the same way that chess is a modelization of war that captures the raw features of strategic thinking, chess world can be seen as small society making the study of the information technologies impact easier to analyze and to arXiv:1203.3434v1 [cs.OH] 15 Mar 2012 grasp. Chess and computer science Alan Turing was born when the Turk automaton was finishing its more than a century long career of illusion1.
    [Show full text]
  • Judit Polgár
    JUDIT POLGÁR Female Chess Player of the Century In 1991 Judit Polgár became the youngest ever Grandmaster at just 15-year-old. She is generally regarded as the strongest female chess player of all time and in 2001 was proclaimed the Female Chess Player of the Century. At the age of 9, Polgár won her first international tournament in New York. This became a cover story in The New York Times. She was 11 when she defeated a Grandmaster for the first time. She became a world youth champion at the age of 12, and then 14 against boys only. The goal for Polgár, and her parents, was the adult absolute world champion title, not the women’s world leadership. As such, she only sat down at open and men’s tournaments. At her last two women’s tournaments, at the age of 12 and 14, her Topics sisters Susan and Sofia, Ildiko Madl and Polgár won the first- and second-Women’s Olympic Champion’s titles in Hungarian chess history. Arts & Culture Celebrities Shortly after the 1988 Thessaloniki Chess Olympiad, Polgár topped the women’s Motivation world rankings, which she had held for 26 years (a Guinness World Record) and Sports after the 1990 Novi Sad Olympic gold, she competed exclusively in men’s or open Women competitions, in the latter cases, occasionally playing with women, too. Polgár won the title of International Grandmaster in 1991, at the age of 15, breaking the record of the legendary Bobby Fischer and becoming the youngest Grandmaster of all times. In the same year, she also won the Hungarian Men’s Super-Championships in Budapest.
    [Show full text]
  • Convert JPG to PDF Online
    ·._.__._.• •••mr . ....... �••• • ·n -�••••• ·� • ... VJL• • Bobby Fischer Remembered This exhibit is intended to share the game of chess, as well as give the viewer just a glimpse of America's best-known chess grandmaster of all time -- Robert James (Bobby) Fisher - as seen on postage stamps. Bobby was born on March 9, 1943 in Chicago and passed away on January 17, 2008 in Reykjavik, Iceland. Bobby Fisher was the eleventh World Chess Champion from 1972 until 1975. Bobby Fischer was a paradox in many ways, a mystery to many and a supreme challenge to others -- but no one will dispute that he was a genius over the chessboard. His fighting spirit was legendary, and he was widely respected for his ability and knowledge over the chessboard. Bobby Fisher to date was the only American World Chess Champion. It is unfortunate that Bobby Fisher will probably never appear on a U.S. postage stamp. The reasons for this are many and varied. However, none have to do with Bobby's abilit)'. to play the "game of kings". He was a chess prodigy early in his life, at age 151/i,he became both the youngest grandmaster and the youngest candidate for the World Championship up to that time. He won the 1963-64 U.S. Championship with 11/11, the only perfect game score ever recorded in the history of the tournament. 15KR SPASSKY FISCHER s{ �, I Shown here is an event cover from the 1972 World Chess Championship, which was played in Reykjavik, Iceland. Bobby was known for having a rather "interesting" hand­ writing, as some of his game records will attest - it is really difficult to read most of his game notes as well.
    [Show full text]