DOCSLIB.ORG

The Neo-Freudians the Neo-Freudians (Jung, Horney and Adler) Agreed with Freud That Unconscious Processes and Childhood Experiences Shape Personality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Neo-Freudians the Neo-Freudians (Jung, Horney and Adler) Agreed with Freud That Unconscious Processes and Childhood Experiences Shape Personality LP 11B Freud/defense mech 1 03/22/04 Personality is an individual’s unique and relatively consistent pattern of thinking, feeling and behaving. There are four basic groups of theorists who try to describe and explain individual similarities and differences. TABLE 11.5 The Major Personality Perspectives Perspective Key Theorists Key Themes and Ideas Psychoanalytic Sigmund Freud Influence of unconscious psychological processes; importance of sexual and aggressive instincts; lasting effects of early childhood experiences Carl Jung The collective unconscious, archetypes, and psychological harmony Karen Horney Importance of parent-child relationship; defending against basic anxiety; womb envy Alfred Adler Striving for superiority, compensating for feelings of inferiority Humanistic Carl Rogers Emphasis on the self-concept, psychological growth, free will, and inherent goodness Abraham Maslow Behavior as motivated by hierarchy of needs and striving for self-actualization; focus on psychologically healthy people Social cognitive Albert Bandura Reciprocal interaction of behavioral, cognitive, and environmental factors; emphasis on conscious thoughts, self- efficacy beliefs, self-regulation, and goal setting Trait Raymond Cattell Emphasis on measuring and describing individual differences; 16 source traits of personality Hans Eysenck Three basic dimensions of personality: introversion—extraversion, neuroticism—emotional stability, and psychoticism Robert McCrae Five-factor model: five basic dimensions of and Paul Costa, personality: neuroticism, extraversion, Jr. openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness (use the mnemonic OCEAN) LP 11B Freud/defense mech 2 03/22/04 Psychoanalytic: Emphasizes the importance of unconscious determinants of behavior, sexual and aggressive drives, and the effects of early childhood experience on later personality development. • Freud Influence of unconscious psychological processes; importance of sexual and aggressive instincts; lasting effects of early childhood experiences Neo-Freudians • Carl Jung The collective unconscious, archetypes, and psychological harmony • Karen Horney Importance of parent-child relationship; defending against basic anxiety; womb envy • Alfred Adler Striving for superiority, compensating for feelings of inferiority LP 11B Freud/defense mech 3 03/22/04 Do We All Speak Freud Here? [Source: Peter Gay in the March 29, 1999 edition of Time p. 68.] • Penis envy: Freud’s famous theory—not favored by feminists—that women wish they had what men are born with (a penis). • Freudian slip: A seemingly meaningless slip of the tongue that is really e- mail direct from the unconscious • Unconscious: Repressed feelings, desires, ideas, and memories that are hidden from the conscious mind. • Repression: Involuntary blocking of an unsettling feelings or memories from conscious thought. • Oedipus complex: In classic Freudian theory, children in their phallic phase (ages three to six) form an erotic attachment to the parent of the opposite sex, and a concomitant hatred (occasionally murderous) of the parent of the same sex. • Castration anxiety: A boy’s unconscious fear of losing his penis and his fantasy that girls have already lost theirs. • Sublimation: Unconscious shifting of an unacceptable drive (lust for your sister, say) into culturally acceptable behavior (lust for your friend’s sister). • Transference: Unconscious shifting of feelings about one person in authority (e.g., a parent) to another (e.g., your analyst). • Id: The part of the mind from which primal needs and drives (e.g., lust, rage) emerge. • Superego: The part of the mind where your parents’ and society’s rules reside; the original guilt trip. • Ego: The mind’s mechanism for keeping in touch with reality, it referees the wrestling match between id and superego. • Phallic symbols: Almost anything can look like a penis, but sometimes, as Freud is supposed to have remarked, “A cigar is just a cigar.” What are other Freudian terms still with us? • Fixation Catharsis • Libido • Anal When the language is so pervasive in society, it gives credibility to the theory and belief. Does the data support Freud? LP 11B Freud/defense mech 4 03/22/04 Freud’s Structure of Personality Structure of personality (see Figure 11.1) Aspect of Level of Consciousness Description or personality Function Ego Mostly conscious such as Mediates between • thoughts and id impulses and • perceptions superego inhibitions; deals with reality (reality principle); the rational part of personality Superego All levels, but mostly Ideals and morals; preconscious such as conscience; • memories and incorporated from • stored knowledge parents Id Unconscious such as: Basic impulses such • Fears as sexual urges and • Unacceptable sexual aggression; operates desires on the pleasure • Violent motives principle; seeks • Irrational wishes immediate • Immoral urges gratification; the • Selfish needs irrational part of the • Shameful experiences personality that is impulsive. LP 11B Freud/defense mech 5 03/22/04 The Neo-Freudians The Neo-Freudians (Jung, Horney and Adler) agreed with Freud that unconscious processes and childhood experiences shape personality. However, there are differences between the Neo- Freudians and Freud. General issues of disagreement: • Neo-Freudians did not believe that behavior was primarily motivated by sexual urges. • Neo-Freudians disagreed that personality was fundamentally determined by childhood experiences, but rather throughout the lifespan, such as Erik Erikson (see chapter 9). • Neo-Freudians did not share Freud’s pessimistic view of human nature and society (remember Freud lived through the devastation of World War I, and witnessed the persecution of Jews in Nazi Germany). LP 11B Freud/defense mech 6 03/22/04 Freudian Defense Mechanisms When the demand of the idealized self (superego) and the impulsive self (id) overwhelm the rational self (ego), anxiety results. According to Freud, one way for the rational self (ego) to temporarily reduce this anxiety is to distort your thoughts and perception of reality. These deceptions can help you maintain an integrated self while searching for a realistic and acceptable solution for the conflict between the superego and id that produces anxiety (also you also might think of it in terms of humanist theory when your experiences are inconsistent with your self-concept). The use of defense mechanisms is very common. Many psychologically healthy individuals temporarily use defense mechanisms to deal with stressful events (Chapter 13: Stress, Health and Coping). However, when defense mechanism delay continually distort “reality” or interfere with our use of more constructive coping strategies, they can be counterproductive and keep us from learning from experience. Why? LP 11B Freud/defense mech 7 03/22/04 The Major Ego Defense Mechanisms Defense Mechanism Explanation Example Repression Unacceptable or unpleasant A woman is unable to recall that she impulses are pushed back into was raped the unconscious Displacement The expression of an unwanted A brother yells at his younger sister feeling or thought is redirected after a teacher gives him a bad grade from a more threatening, powerful person to a weaker one Sublimation Diversion of unwanted A person with strong feelings of impulses into socially approved aggression becomes a soldier thoughts, feelings, or behaviors Rationalization A distortion of reality in which A person who is passed over for an a person justifies what happens award says she didn’t really want it (also known as sour grapes) in the first place Projection Attributing unwanted impulses A man who is angry at his father acts and feelings to someone else lovingly to his father but complains that his father is angry with him Reaction Formation Thinking or behaving in a way Threatened by their awakening that is the extreme opposite of sexual attraction to girls, adolescent unacceptable urges or impulses boys often go out of their way to tease and torment adolescent girls Denial Refusal to accept or A person who is convicted for DUI acknowledge an anxiety- three times this year denies that he producing piece of information has a problem with alcohol. Undoing A form of unconscious A woman who gets a tax refund by repentance that involves cheating on her taxes makes a larger neutralizing or atoning for an than usual donation to the church unacceptable action or thought collection on the following Sunday with a second action or thought Regression People behave as if they were at A boss has a temper tantrum when an earlier stage of development an employee makes a mistake LP 11B Freud/defense mech 8 03/22/04 Is homophobia an indicator of latent homosexuality? Homophobia consists of feelings of fear, discomfort and aversion that some people experience in interacting with gay individuals. Psychoanalytic theorists have argued that homophobia among men may be rooted in anxiety about the possibility of being homosexual. Psychoanalysts argue that homophobia results from repression of one’s latent homosexuality and reaction formation, which leads some men to accentuate their masculinity and to be especially hostile towards gays. The following two groups (heterosexual, highly homophobic men compared with heterosexual, low homophobic men) watched three types of explicit sexually erotic videos and measured their sexual arousal. Differences in Sexual Arousal to Erotic Videos Female Male heterosexual Homosexual Homosexual activity activity activity Heterosexual men • High Greater homophobic No No arousal by • Low Difference in Difference in the highly homophobic arousal arousal homophobic men Although the highly homophobic men were physiologically more aroused by video of male homosexual activity, their self- report of sexual arousal was similar to those low in homophobia..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Psychoanalytic Conceptions of Marriage and Marital Relationships 381 Been Discussing, Since These Figures Are Able to Reanimate Pictures of Their Mother Or Father
    UNIVERSITY OF NIŠ The scientific journal FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Philosophy and Sociology Vol.2, No 7, 2000 pp. 379 - 389 Editor of series: Gligorije Zaječaranović Address: Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, YU Tel: +381 18 547-095, Fax: +381 18 547-950 PSYCHOANALYTIC CONCEPTIONS OF MARRIAGE AND MARITAL RELATIONSHIPS UDC 159.964.28+173.1+340.61 Zorica Marković University of Niš, Faculty of Philosophy, Niš, Yugoslavia Abstract. This work disclusses marital types and merital relationships as by several psychoanalysts: Sigmund Freud, Annie Reich, Helene Deutch, Knight Aldrich and Bela Mittelman. It analyzes kinds of relations hips, dynamics of interaction and inner mechanisms of interaction.Comparing marital types of the mentioned authors it can be seen that there is agreement among them and that they mainly represent further elaboration and "topic variation" of the basic marital types which are discussed by Sigmund Freud: anaclictic and narcissistic.Also, it can be concluded that all analysed marital types possess several common characteristics: 1. they are defined by relationships in childhood with parents or other important persons with whom a child was in touch; 2. dynamics of partner relationships is defined by unconscious motives; 3. same kinds of relationships and same type of partner selection a person repeats in all further attempts in spite of the fact that it does not give satisfactory results. Key words: psychoanalysis, marriage, partner, choice, relationships According to Si gmund Fr e ud , the founder of psychoanalysis, marital partner choice, as well as marital relationships, are defined much before marriage was concluded. Relationship with marital partner is determined by relationships with parents and important persons in one's childhood.
    [Show full text]
  • About Psychoanalysis
    ABOUT PSYCHOANALYSIS What is psychoanalysis? What is psychoanalytic treatment for? Freud’s major discoveries and innovations • The Unconscious • Early childhood experiences • Psychosexual development • The Oedipus complex • Repression • Dreams are wish-fulfilments • Transference • Free association • The Ego, the Id and the Super-Ego Major discoveries and additions to psychoanalytic theory since Freud: the different strands and schools within psychoanalysis today • Classical and contemporary Freudians • Sándor Ferenczi • Ego-Psychology • Classical and contemporary Kleinians • The Bionian branch of the Kleinian School • Winnicott’s branch of the Object-Relations Theory • French psychoanalysis • Self-Psychology • Relational Psychoanalysis The core psychoanalytic method and setting • Method • Setting Various Psychoanalytic Treatment Methods (adult, children, groups, etc) • Psychoanalysis • Psychoanalytic or psychodynamic psychotherapy • Children and adolescents • Psychoanalytic psychodrama • Psychoanalytic Couples- and Family-Psychotherapy • Psychoanalytic Groups Psychoanalytic training Applied psychoanalysis The IPA, its organisation and ethical guidelines Where to encounter psychoanalysis? What is psychoanalysis? Psychoanalysis is both a theory of the human mind and a therapeutic practice. It was founded by Sigmund Freud between 1885 and 1939 and continues to be developed by psychoanalysts all over the world. Psychoanalysis has four major areas of application: 1) as a theory of how the mind works 2) as a treatment method for psychic problems 3) as a method of research, and 4) as a way of viewing cultural and social phenomena like literature, art, movies, performances, politics and groups. What is psychoanalytic treatment for? Psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy are for those who feel caught in recurrent psychic problems that impede their potential to experience happiness with their partners, families, and friends as well as success and fulfilment in their work and the normal tasks of everyday life.
    [Show full text]
  • Science in Context Fear and Envy: Sexual Difference and The
    Science in Context http://journals.cambridge.org/SIC Additional services for Science in Context: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Fear and Envy: Sexual Difference and the Economies of Feminist Critique in Psychoanalytic Discourse José Brunner Science in Context / Volume 10 / Issue 01 / March 1997, pp 129 - 170 DOI: 10.1017/S0269889700000302, Published online: 26 September 2008 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0269889700000302 How to cite this article: José Brunner (1997). Fear and Envy: Sexual Difference and the Economies of Feminist Critique in Psychoanalytic Discourse. Science in Context, 10, pp 129-170 doi:10.1017/ S0269889700000302 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/SIC, IP address: 109.66.70.204 on 12 Feb 2014 Science in Context 10, I (1997), pp. 129-170 JOSfiBRUNNER Fear and Envy: Sexual Difference and the Economies of Feminist Critique in Psychoanalytic Discourse The Argument This essay examines Freud's construction of a mythical moment during early childhood, in which differences between male and female sexual identities are said to originate. It focuses on the way in which Freud divides fear and envy between the sexes, allocating the emotion of (castration) fear to men, and that of (penis) envy to women. On the one hand, the problems of this construction are pointed out, but on the other hand, it is shown that even a much-maligned myth may still provide food for thought. Then, four critiques of Freud which have been articulated by prominent feminist psychoanalysts — Karen Horney, Nancy Chodorow, Luce Irigaray, and Jessica Benjamin — are presented, as well as the alternative visions of sexual identities which these thinkers have developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrapsychic Perspectives on Personality
    PSYCHODYNAMIC PERSPECTIVES ON PERSONALITY This educational CAPPE module is part i in section III: Theories of Human Functioning and Spirituality Written by Peter L. VanKatwyk, Ph.D. Introduction Psychodynamic theory goes back more than 100 years and has been a principal influence in the early history of clinical pastoral education (CPE). It is a way of thinking about personality dynamics in interpreting and understanding both the spiritual care-provider and care-receiver. This module will briefly summarize the basic theory and punctuate psychodynamic concepts that have been significant in the study of psychology of religion and theological reflection in the practice of spiritual care and counselling. Psychodynamic theories presently practiced include in historical sequence the following three schools that will be covered in this module: 1. Ego Psychology, following and extending the classic psychoanalytic theory of Freud, with major representatives in Anna Freud, Heinz Hartmann and Erik Erikson. 2. Object Relations Theory, derived from the work of Melanie Klein and members of the “British School,” including those who are prominent in religious studies and the practice of spiritual care: Ronald Fairbairn, Harry Guntrip, and D.W. Winnicott. 3. Self Psychology, modifying psychoanalytic theory with an interpersonal relations focus, originating in Heinz Kohut, systematized and applied for social work and counselling practice by Miriam Elson. In conjunction these psychodynamic theories offer three main perspectives on personality: 1. the human mind harbors conflict – with powerful unconscious forces that are continually thwarted in expressing themselves by a broad range of counteracting psychological processes and defense mechanisms. 2. each person carries an unconscious internalized world of personal relationships – with mental representations that reflect earlier experiences of self and others which often surface as patterns in current relationships and interpersonal problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Make a Freudian Slip
    PSYCHOLOGY DON’T MAKE A FREUDIAN SLIP Resources for Courses Activity Overview Outlining Freud’s Theory of Gender Development is a difficult task. Firstly, there are a lot of specialist terms that students often fail to include (e.g. unconscious processes, identification and internalisation) and secondly, it is very difficult to write a concise summary of Freud’s Theory because there is so much to include. The aim of this task is to consolidate student’s knowledge of the key Freudian terms and to practice writing a concise summary of Freud’s Theory of Gender Development. Resources Required . Don’t Make A Freudian Slip Handout Teacher Instructions Teaching & Learning Strategy A Provide the students with a copy of the Don’t Make A Freudian Slip Handout. Ask the students to read each paragraph in turn and add in the missing specialist terminology. After that, once you have gone through the answers, ask your students to highlight the specialist terminology related to Freud’s Theory of Gender Development. Once your students have completed the first task, ask them to write a concise summary of Freud’s Theory in approximately 125-175 words, while trying to incorporate all of the key features of Freud’s Theory. Tell the students to image that they are answering the following exam question: Describe and evaluate Freud’s psychoanalytic explanation of gender development. (16 marks) If you want to be cruel, only give your students six-eight minutes to complete their summary, as this is roughly the length of time they would have to write an outline in their exam.
    [Show full text]
  • SLIPS of the TONGUE: the FACTS and a STRATIFICATIONAL MODEL by Gary S. Dell and Peter A. Reich
    SLIPS OF THE TONGUE: THE FACTS AND A STRATIFICATIONAL MODEL by Gary S. Dell and Peter A. Reich One of the best ways of finding out how a system is constructed is to observe what happens when that system breaks down, when it fails to operate perfectly. Suppose you regularly receive a check from a small company, The check may be generated by a human being, or it may be produced by a computer. So long as everything operates perfectly, it would be impossible to determine which. But you may get clues if a mistake occurs, because computers and human beings make different types of errors. If you get a check for $0.00, it is likely to be a computer error. If you get a check for $517.00 when you are owed $571.00, it is likely to be a human error, because human beings often transpose digits. Similarly, if your goal is to find out what the system is like that underlies language, it can be very useful to look at what happens when things go wrong. This is the issue to which this paper is addressed. We shall review one class of language errors-slips of the tongue-to explore the implications this phenomenon has toward understanding in general how language processing works in human beings. We shall argue that stratificational grammar may be on the right track as a model of language behavior, because a modified version of it can be designed that makes very humanlike errors. THE FACTS Slips of the tongue as a Iinguistic phenomenon have been known about and studied since before the time of Freud.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Psychoanalysis Psikologi Kepribadian
    Classical Psychoanalysis Psikologi Kepribadian Rizqy Amelia Zein 2017-09-14 1 / 67 [1] Image credit: Giphy 2 / 67 Classical Psychoanalysis [...also known as Ego Psychology, Psychodynamics] 3 / 67 First things rst: Instinct! 4 / 67 Instincts (1) Freud denes it as the motivating forces that drive behaviour and determine its direction. Instinct (or Trieb in German), is a form of energy, that is transformed into physical energy and serve its function to connect the physical and psychological needs. Freud argues that human always experience instinctual tension and unable to escape from it. So most of our activities are directed to reduce this tension. People could have different ways to reduce the tension (e.g. sexual drives can manifest in various sexual behaviours). It's also possible to substitute the objects (displacement) and this process is primarily important to determine one's behaviour. Freud coined the terms "life" and "death" instincts, which posit different process of primal motivations. 11 / 67 Instincts (2) The Life Instinct 1. Serve the purpose of survival of the individual and the species by seeking to satisfy the needs for food, water, air, and sex. 2. The life instincts are oriented toward growth and development. The psychic energy manifested by the life instincts is the libido. 3. The libido can be attached to or invested in objects, a concept Freud called cathexis. 4. So if you like Ryan Gosling so much, for example, then your libido is cathected to him. 12 / 67 Instincts (2) The Death Instinct 1. In opposition to the life instincts, Freud postulated the destructive or death instincts.
    [Show full text]
  • Fanonian Ambivalence: on Psychoanalysis and Postcolonial Critique
    Derek Hook and Ross Truscott Fanonian ambivalence: on psychoanalysis and postcolonial critique Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Hook, Derek and Truscott, Ross (2013) Fanonian ambivalence: on psychoanalysis and postcolonial critique. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33 (3). pp. 155-169. ISSN 1068-8471 © 2013 American Psychological Association This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60257/ Available in LSE Research Online: November 2014 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Running head: Fanonian ambivalence Title: Fanonian ambivalence: On psychoanalysis and postcolonial critique Authors: Derek Hook & Ross Truscott Derek Hook, Department of Psychosocial Studies, Birkbeck College, London, UK & Department of Psychology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Ross Truscott, Department of African Studies and Social Change, University of Fort Hare, East London, South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixation and Repetition - Argument
    Fixation and Repetition - argument Alexandre Stevens Repetition is one of the four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis, as set out by Lacan in Seminar XI where, with repetition, he introduced a new mode of the real. To do so, he distinguished it from transference, which the post- Freudians had reduced to being merely the repetition of figures from the past. As for fixation, it is a Freudian term, which Freud made use of in a rather discreet way and which was never given a significant place in his metapsychology. It was Jacques-Alain Miller, a careful reader of Freud, who gave it a new relevance when he took up the last period of Lacan’s teaching: "jouissance (...) is an event of the body. (...) it is of the order of trauma (...) it is the object of a fixation”.1 This was not the first time he had drawn upon Freud to propose a way of approaching Lacan’s last teaching. He had already proposed a reading of Inhibition, Symptom and Anxiety in this sense.2 Fixierung I referred to the index of the Gesammelte Werke and found that fixation is a term that appeared for just about the first time in Freud’s work, in 1905, in his “Three Essays on Sexuality”. In the development of sexual life, Freud identifies initial disturbing factors – it being understood that it is disturbed, in varying degrees, for each person. In Freud, these first, constitutional factors are still not very precise. They contain what he calls a “pertinacity” towards the impressions of sexual life. It is this “pertinacity” 3 that he calls a 1 Jacques-Alain Miller, L’être et l’Un, lesson 4 (9 February 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Sigmund Freud
    Term Test 4 • mean = 73.6 • SD = 12.6 • range = 39-100 • one Q discarded • optional exam viewing to follow once Final exam everyone has written • Thurs April 15, 2 pm test • Winter semester only • 30% of course grade, mult choice, up to 100 Qs • 60% last third, 20% middle third, 20% first third • optional review session, last day of classes Three Minute Review SOCIAL INFLUENCE: OBEDIENCE • Why do people obey to an extreme degree? – Cult followers • Jonestown, Waco – bureaucrats in genocides • Nazi Holocaust, Cambodia, Rwanda, etc. • Milgram’s Obedience Experiments – The majority of people will follow orders to an extreme degree – Results surprised many people, esp. psychologists – Affected by proximity to victim, proximity to authority, and reactions of others in same situation – Not affected by personality traits • Stanford Prison Experiment – Ordinary people get caught up in roles • Banality of evil (Hannah Arendt) – Perhaps Adolf Eichmann was no different than the rest of us • Psychology of genocide 1. difficult living conditions, fierce competition for resources 2. strong in- vs. out-groups 3. violence, blaming the victim 4. violence justifies itself • can’t stop because of cognitive dissonance Take a Personality Test • Take the test • Put your ID but NOT your name • Check the web site for results • Read instructions on the web carefully It’s a Small World After All • Stanley Milgram also did other cool, more optimistic experiments • Milgram (1967) -- If you pick any two people at random, how many intermediate acquaintances does it take to establish a link between them? Joe Smith Timothy Kuhn Omaha, Neb. Boston, Mass.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title A NEUROBIOLOGICAL MODEL OF PERCEPTION Considerations for Transference Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53w6141z Journal Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24(4) Authors Pincus, David Freeman, Walter J, III Modell, Arnold Publication Date 2007-10-01 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Psychoanalytic Psychology Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association 2007, Vol. 24, No. 4, 623–640 0736-9735/07/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.24.4.623 A NEUROBIOLOGICAL MODEL OF PERCEPTION Considerations for Transference David Pincus, DMH Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine and Case Western Reserve University Walter Freeman, MD University of California, Berkeley Arnold Modell, MD Harvard Medical School and Boston Psychoanalytic Institute Transference is a key concept in psychoanalysis, distinguishing the analytic treatment from other forms of psychotherapy. In this essay, the authors place transference into the context of a general psychology of human functioning and link it to the neurobiology of perception. The authors briefly review the literature within and outside of psychoanalysis, define transference through the lens of perception, and propose that it is ubiquitous in humans. When not impaired, transference is an adaptive ego function that emerges, along with countertransference, in the context of any interpersonal situation of signif- icant emotional import. The authors draw on W. Freeman’s (2003, 2004) research on olfaction, which has since been replicated in other sensory modalities, for a neurodynamic basis for their model of perception and describe how transference may be thought of as an evolved form of it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neural Basis of the Dynamic Unconscious
    Neuropsychoanalysis, 2011, 13 (1) 5 The Neural Basis of the Dynamic Unconscious Heather A. Berlin (New York) A great deal of complex cognitive processing occurs at the unconscious level and affects how humans behave, think, and feel. Sci- entists are only now beginning to understand how this occurs on the neural level. Understanding the neural basis of consciousness requires an account of the neural mechanisms that underlie both conscious and unconscious thought, and their dynamic interac- tion. For example, how do conscious impulses, thoughts, or desires become unconscious (e.g., repression) or, conversely, how do unconscious impulses, desires, or motives become conscious (e.g., Freudian slips)? Research taking advantage of advances in technologies, like functional magnetic resonance imaging, has led to a revival and re-conceptualization of some of the key concepts of psychoanalytic theory, but steps toward understanding their neural basis have only just commenced. According to psychoanalytic theory, unconscious dynamic processes defensively remove anxiety-provoking thoughts and impulses from consciousness in re- sponse to one’s conflicting attitudes. The processes that keep unwanted thoughts from entering consciousness include repression, suppression, and dissociation. In this literature review, studies from psychology and cognitive neuroscience in both healthy and patient populations that are beginning to elucidate the neural basis of these phenomena are discussed and organized within a con- ceptual framework. Further studies in this emerging field at the intersection of psychoanalytic theory and neuroscience are needed. Keywords: unconscious; psychodynamic; repression; suppression; dissociation; neural “Nothing is so difficult as not deceiving oneself.” 1998a). Early psychodynamic theorists attempted to Ludwig Wittgenstein [1889–1951] explain phenomena observed in the clinic, but lat- er cognitive scientists used computational models of the mind to explain empirical data.
    [Show full text]