Boisi Center Interviews No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boisi Center Interviews No the boisi center interviews no. 87: January 30, 2014 joseph gerson is disarmament coordinator, director of programs in New England, and director of the Peace and Economic Security Program for the American Friends Service Committee. He spoke with Boisi Center associate director Erik Owens and undergraduate research assistant Mary Popeo before his presentation on peace activism at the Boisi Center. owens: What is the best argument wars since Nagasaki. This is the area see that referenced in the International you’ve ever heard for maintaining a nu- of my specialized research. To speak of Court of Justice’s advisory opinion on clear weapons stockpile? deterrent policies, I think we have to look the use and threatened use of nuclear at the Soviet Union, Russia today, and weapons. Beyond that, you’re dealing gerson: I don’t think there is a decent China. This would be a revolutionary with the effects of radiation through argument because the use of these weap- approach in our discourse, but one has to time. People who are exposed at one ons is beyond abominable. At the very pursue truth. point may be dying of cancer two years, least, it’s genocidal. Even with a small five years, ten years, or thirty years later. exchange between, for example, India And even beyond that, you’re looking at and Pakistan, you have famine across the the genetic damage. I work with second- Northern Hemisphere and an estimat- and third-generation A-bomb survivors ed one billion people dead. I think the in Japan, who live with a constant fear of model should be South Africa, which had cancer. They talk to me about their sib- a full nuclear program and yet opted to lings who have died. The indiscriminate halt, reverse, and get rid of it. As people murder through time caused by nuclear in Hiroshima say, these are weapons of weapons certainly separates them from the devil. Not that I believe in a devil, but other weapons. nuclear weapons are fundamentally evil, and there’s no legitimate argument for owens: Have the nations of the world their use. abandoned the concept of tactical nuclear weapons? owens: What about arguments based on deterrence or future need? gerson: I don’t think so. They’re still in our stockpile, and the Russians have gerson: The deterrence model has them. When it comes to war, perceived dominated discourse. However, the limits and boundaries often disappear. reality is that the United States hasn’t owens: What separates nuclear weap- For example, it’s interesting to read practiced deterrence. As I explained in ons in your mind from other weapons? about Roosevelt’s condemnation of aerial my book, you can find the documentation Let’s assume that one would prefer that bombing in 1939, a few years after which from the Pentagon saying that deterrence we eliminate all weapons, but there’s a the U.S. was engaged in war. Our allies has never been our policy. The reality special worry about nuclear weapons. were bombing Hamburg and we were is not only the illegitimate use of the gerson: You begin with the mass, in- firebombing Japan. Once the technology nuclear weapons in Japan, but also their discriminate murder of huge numbers of and the weapons are in place, they can repeated use by the United States as a people. In addition to the moral outrages always be used. form of extortion and blackmail threats involved, you’re dealing with fundamen- in more than 30 international crises and tal violations of international law. You 1 the boisi center interview: joseph gerson owens: Speaking of technology, what gerson: There are two tracks: what UN, I watched heads of state, foreign do you see as the link between the pre- needs to happen among the govern- ministers and ambassadors express their sumed peaceful use of nuclear energy ments, and what needs to happen among outrage at the refusal of the U.S. to fulfill and the existence of nuclear weapons? Is popular movements. Speaking about the this legal commitment to co-convene the the former forever tainted as a result of former, in 2005, the treaty-averse Bush conference. the possibility of the latter? administration sabotaged the NPT review As we near 2015, we will see shell game and potentially the NPT itself. No agree- gerson: Nuclear power should not be politics from the Obama administration ment came out of the 2005 conference used on its own terms, independent of around nonproliferation, nuclear security and the NPT order was threatened. nuclear weapons. We have clearly seen and so on. However, the United States this in India, Israel, Pakistan and Iran. This made 2010 particularly important. needs to take meaningful steps toward Once a country has the technology, it is There were intense negotiations down disarmament before 2015, or the NPT not a big leap from so-called peaceful to the last minute, resulting in a funda- order will be in serious jeopardy. One production of nuclear power to nuclear hopes for deeper commitments from the weapons. nuclear powers to move toward fulfilling their Article VI commitments. Nobody Even before that, there’s the implicit dan- has enormous confidence in that, but ger of nuclear power plants. Fukushima “The reality is that that’s what we have to press for. was waiting to happen. Putting nuclear sometimes things plants on faults is insane. Here in the At the popular level, in 2010, I found U.S., we had Three Mile Island and triti- get so abstracted myself at the center of international NGO um leaks at Vermont Yankee. There are organizing to put pressure on govern- many immediate dangers. We are many that we totally ments. The peace movement does have years into this and yet no one knows what forget the human allies among governments. There are a to do with the waste, which poisons the number of governments working hard for environment and will threaten human dimensions. the NPT’s implementation. The UN High survival for thousands and thousands of Commissioner for Disarmament, Sergio years. The American Duarte, was very supportive. We even had Ban Ki-moon involved as a speaker. He This is one of the challenges as we work Friends Service came to a conference that I was involved on the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in organizing. It was quite remarkable. (NPT) and its review. The NPT was one Committee has Four of us, operating on a shoestring of the three most fundamental treaties budget, brought other people in along the of the 20th century. It has three pillars. always valued way with a larger committee overseeing As the Iranians and the North Koreans that human face.” the process. When the movement was have been reminding us for years, one of at a trough, we assembled 1,000 people the pillars is that nations that sign on to for the conference and had a march of the commitment to cease development 15,000 people from Times Square to the of nuclear weapons have the inalienable mental agreement. The nuclear powers United Nations. We’ll have to replicate right to use nuclear power for peaceful reaffirmed their commitments to Article that in 2015. purposes. Having nuclear energy is an VI and to negotiating the complete elim- international right that they have. This is owens: Could you tell us a bit about the ination of their arsenals. In the diplo- a major flaw in the NPT. American Friends Service Committee macy with the non-aligned nations, the and its work on this particular issue? popeo: As a program committee United States committed to co-convene member at the American Friends Ser- a conference on the creation of a Middle gerson: The Service Committee is a vice Committee (AFSC), I know we are East nuclear weapons and weapons of Quaker-based organization created in currently preparing for the upcoming mass destruction-free zone in 2012. That 1917, during the First World War. Around 2014 Preparatory Conference. What other got America through the conference, but this time, many of the other traditional preparations do you think are necessary afterwards the Obama administration peace organizations were created in the for the 2015 NPT review? Ideally, what was not willing to fulfill its commitment. U.S. and in Europe. AFSC has evolved would come out of the 2015 NPT review Needless to say, many governments were over the years but its principal commit- and what must we do in order to make very upset with the U.S. At the High ments are to respect the dignity of every that happen? Level Meeting on Disarmament at the individual, to eschew violence and to 2 the boisi center interview: joseph gerson work for nonviolent conflict resolution. In the archives, there is a letter written by the head of the Committee in August 1945, just days after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to President Truman, which was sent at the same time as a letter from the forerunner of the National Council of Churches, also condemning nuclear weapons. The Service Committee did early work with Norman Cousins. For those who survived the atomic bombs, the mutila- tion and devastation of people’s bodies was extraordinary. For women, there was discrimination in courting and marriage due to fears of genetic damage. Because America wouldn’t allow the Japanese to learn about the atomic bombings during in its testing, devastated many innocent My second contact was at the 1968 the occupation, people even feared that people. Democratic convention in Chicago. The radiation was contagious. With help from same gentleman, Tony Henry—who I In some ways, AFSC was ahead of the dy- the Service Committee, Norman Cous- later learned had been one of the four namic of the international disarmament ins brought a number of young women African-Americans who integrated the movement, which is now focused on the called the Hiroshima Maidens to New University of Texas—was involved in the human consequences of nuclear weap- York for plastic surgery.
Recommended publications
  • Hiroshima-ICAN Academy on Nuclear Weapons and Global Security 2020
    Hiroshima-ICAN Academy on Nuclear Weapons and Global Security 2020 Hiroshima - ICAN Academy on Nuclear Weapons and Global Security 2020 --- Contents --- Program Framework Profiles of Guest Educators and Coordinators Contact Persons Program Framework Introduction: Hiroshima Prefecture and the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons ("ICAN"), the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate organization, will hold the Hiroshima-ICAN Academy on Nuclear Weapons and Global Security 2020. Through this training program, we aim to nurture global leaders to make concrete and peaceful contributions to the world. Due to the global spread of COVID-19, the Academy will be composed of two parts. Part 1 is the online learning course and webinars, and Part 2 the in-person training program to take place in Hiroshima City. The dates for Part 2 are to be confirmed after carefully examining the COVID-19 circumstances in Japan and overseas. Further information will be provided at the end of Part 1. Program Framework: The program of the Academy is designed around four themes. The first theme, “Humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons,” is a crucial component of the program, particularly given that the Academy is organized by Hiroshima Prefecture and Part 2 is physically held in Hiroshima. We believe all discussions on nuclear weapons and global security must begin here. The second theme is “Political, legal and technical aspects – nuclear weapons and global security.” Leading experts in the field will offer videos to watch and documents to read as learning materials that aim to shed light on various aspects of the theme. The third theme, “Civil society in action,” will take up a wide range of civil society efforts including education, awareness raising, and advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • (2020) the Story of Women Scarred in Hiroshima Re- Minds Us the Threat of Nuclear War Has Never Gone Away
    Alexis-Martin, Becky (2020) The story of women scarred in Hiroshima re- minds us the threat of nuclear war has never gone away. The Independent. Downloaded from: https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/626386/ Version: Published Version Publisher: The Independent Please cite the published version https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk The story of women scarred in Hiroshima reminds us the threat of nuclear war has never gone away independent.co.uk/independentpremium/voices/hiroshima-atom-bomb-women-japan-plastic-surgery-nuclear-threat- a9655696.html 6 August 2020 An immaculately dressed woman moves forward in her seat, leaning on her walking stick. Her clear gaze is undaunted by age as she firmly declares, “No more atomic bomb, no more nuclear weapon, no more war.” This is Shigeko Sasamori, an atomic bomb survivor. She is in conversation with peace activist Clifton Truman, the grandson of President Harry S Truman – the man who ordered the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 and 9 August, 1945. Sasamori was only 14 years old when she suffered burns to 25 per cent of her body. She is one of the so- called Hiroshima Maidens who visited America for reconstructive surgery in 1955. It is now 75 years since Hiroshima was destroyed by Little Boy. In its aftermath, fires raged across the city. Concrete was seared salmon-pink by radioactivity and buildings crumbled from the blast. Death and cremation occurred simultaneously, as human bodies were 1/3 reduced to ash and the traces of their shadows were scorched onto the ground. It is estimated that 135,000 people died - many of whom were women and children.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomoe Otsuki
    Volume 13 | Issue 32 | Number 2 | Article ID 4356 | Aug 10, 2015 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Politics of Reconstruction and Reconciliation in U.S-Japan Relations—Dismantling the Atomic Bomb Ruins of Nagasaki’s Urakami Cathedral Tomoe Otsuki Abstract: This paper explores the politics surrounding the dismantling of the ruins of Nagasaki’s Urakami Cathedral. It shows how U.S-Japan relations in the mid-1950s shaped the 1958 decision by the Catholic community of Urakami to dismantle and subsequently to reconstruct the ruins. The paper also assesses the significance of the struggle over the ruins of the Urakami Cathedral for understanding the respective responses to atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It further casts new light on the wartime role of the Catholic Church and of Nagai Takashi. Keywords: Nagasaki, Atomic Bomb, Urakami Cathedral, the People-to-People program, Lucky Dragon # 5 incident, Japanese antinuclear movement, the peaceful use of nuclear energy, sister city relation between Nagasaki and St. Paul, U.S.-Japan Security Alliance. The two photographs below depict the remnants of the Urakami Cathedral following the atomic bombing of Nagasaki. Both were taken in 1953 by Takahara Itaru, a former Mainichi Shimbun photographer as well as a Remnants of the Southern Wall and statues of the Nagasaki hibakusha. Most of the children saints of Urakami Cathedral playing beside the ruins were born after the Photo courtesy of Takahara Itaru atomic bombing and grew up in Urakami’s atomic field. Takahara’s photographs capture the remnants of the cathedral in shaping the Children play in remnants of belfry of Urakami postwar landscape and lives of people in and Cathedral 1 around Urakami.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of Medical Doctors in Hiroshima
    - Memoirs of Medical Doctors in Hiroshima - Contents (page # in original Japanese version) Chapter 1: Atomic Bombing and Relief Activities ·································· 2 (1) Section 1: Relief Activities for A-bomb Victims “25th anniversary of atomic bombing” Yoshimasa Matsuzaka ············· 4 (3) “Longest day” Hiroshi Sawachika ············ 7 (18) “Memory of atomic bombing” Yutaka Tani ······················ 11 (34) [Discussion Meeting] Being exposed and treating the exposed – Record of physicians affected by the A-bomb and providing medical care – Takemi Sato, Hagie Ota, Nobumasa Kimura (Moderator) ·············· 15 (74) Chapter 2: Establishment of Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Casualty Council (HABC) and Research on the Late Effects of the Atomic Bombs ······························ 31 (175) Section 1: Research on the Late Effects of the Atomic Bombs Progress of research on the late effects of the atomic bombs Nanao Kamada ················ 35 (179) [Discussion Meeting] In search of the origin of research on the late effects of the atomic bombs Tomin Harada, Gensaku Oho, Hiromi Nakayama, Nobumasa Kimura (Moderator) ··········································· 45 (196) Chapter 3: Medical Care and Medical Examination of A-bomb Survivors Residing in South Korea and the United States ·················································· 63 (243) *This is a translated version of extracts of a book “Hiroshima Ishi no Karute” published by the Hiroshima City Medical Association in July 1990. The association complied the book from a collection of memos written by medical doctors in Hiroshima. The book is based on the memos submitted to the association for special editions of newsletters, released from 1970 to 1988, reporting about the aftermath of the Atomic Bombing. *Individual names of citizens, except for doctors or public personae, were anonymized, and some names were read in commonly- used ways.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Irvine UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Publishing Words to Prevent Them from Becoming True: The Radical Praxis of Günther Anders Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5nr2z210 Author Costello, Daniel Christopher Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Publishing Words to Prevent Them from Becoming True: The Radical Praxis of Günther Anders DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Comparative Literature by Daniel C. Costello Dissertation Committee: Professor Jane O. Newman, Chair Professor Emeritus Alexander Gelley Associate Professor Kai Evers 2014 © 2014 Daniel C. Costello TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgments vi Curriculum Vitae vii Abstract of the Dissertation viii INTRODUCTION I. A Writerly Life a. Beginnings 1 b. A Note on Style 13 c. Prelude 19 CHAPTER ONE: COMPETENCE AND AUTHORITY I. Introductions a. The Promethean Discrepancy 25 b. Network and Actor-Network Theories 29 c. Archives and the Occasional Philosophy 31 II. Historical Contexts: The Scientists’ Movement a. Genesis 34 b. One World Government 37 c. The Changing Role of Science 44 d. Generational Outcomes 51 III. Backgrounds: Anders and the Bomb a. Wars and Exile 55 b. Return to Vienna 62 IV. Historical Contexts: The Second Wave a. Fallout 65 b. Forms: Diary, Fable, Dialog, and Commandment 69 c. Groundwork to Praxis 73 V. Organizational Work a. Pursuing Scientists 81 ii b. A Pugwash for the Humanities 86 VI. Conclusions 88 CHAPTER TWO: THE CASE OF CLAUDE EATHERLY I. Introductions a.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Nuclear Weapons ……………………… 323 33
    Sayonara Nukes The Case for Abolishing Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Weapons Dennis Riches CENTER FOR GLOCAL STUDIES SEIJO UNIVERSITY in the series Seijo Glocal Studies in Society and Culture edited by Tomiyuki Uesugi, Masahito Ozawa The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the Center for Glocal Studies, the Research Institute for the Humanities and Social Sciences, Seijo University. First published in 2018 Published by: Center for Glocal Studies, Research Institute for the Humanities and Social Sciences, Seijo University 6-1-20, Seijo, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8511, JAPAN E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.seijo.ac.jp/research/glocal-center/ Copyright@ Center for Glocal Studies, Seijo University, Japan 2018 All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. Cover design by Rokuo Design Printed and bound in Japan by Sanrei Printing Co., Ltd., Tokyo. ISBN 978-4-906845-31-6 C3036 Table of Contents Foreword Introduction ……………………………………………………………… 1 PART ONE: CINEMA, LITERATURE AND POPULAR CULTURE 1. Don Quixote and the Hyperboloid Cooling Towers ………………… 11 2. The Nuclear Age in Dylan and the Beats …………………………… 17 3. Alpha and Beta Particles Shoot Horses, Don’t They? ……………… 27 4. LOST After an Earthquake-Tsunami-Nuclear Meltdown Catastrophe ……………………………………………………………………… 33 5. Nora Ephron, Silkwood, and the Great American Romcom ………… 43 6.
    [Show full text]
  • A Meditation on the Life of Hiroshima Pilot Paul Tibbets, Jr
    The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Volume 6 | Issue 1 | Number 0 | Jan 2008 Defending the Indefensible: A Meditation on the Life of Hiroshima Pilot Paul Tibbets, Jr. by Peter J. Kuznick Defending the Indefensible: A Meditation on the publicly and thoughtfully on the A-bomb Life of Hiroshima Pilot Paul Tibbets, Jr. decision, the lives it cost and also the lives it saved.”[1] A closer look at Tibbets’s life and Peter J. Kuznick comparison of his views with those of others who participated in the atomic bombings will shed On November 1, Paul Warfield Tibbets, Jr., the light not only on whether Tibbets was as humane man who piloted the plane that dropped the and thoughtfully reflective as Kamm suggests, atomic bomb on Hiroshima, died at hisbut on why so many World War II veterans share Columbus, Ohio home at age 92. Throughout his Tibbets’s difficulty in moving beyond official adult life, he was a warrior. He bravely fought pieties of 1945 and today to understand the the Nazis in 1942 and 1943. He fought the complex history of the end of the Pacific War, the Japanese in 1944 and 1945. And he spent the next role the atomic bombings played in the Japanese 62 years fighting to defend the atomic bombings. surrender, and their own role in the historical process.[2] Paul Tibbets was born in Quincy, Illinois on February 23, 1915 and raised mostly in Miami, Florida. His father, a wholesale confectioner, sent him to Western Military Academy in Alton, Illinois. As a young man, Tibbets had aspired to become a doctor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Meditation on the Life of Hiroshima Pilot Paul Tibbets, Jr
    Volume 6 | Issue 1 | Article ID 2642 | Jan 01, 2008 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Defending the Indefensible: A Meditation on the Life of Hiroshima Pilot Paul Tibbets, Jr. Peter J. Kuznick Defending the Indefensible: A Meditation Basing his judgment of Tibbets on the on the Life of Hiroshima Pilot Paul“accounts of those who knew him,” Kamm Tibbets, Jr. declared that Tibbets was “a humane man, who reflected publicly and thoughtfully on the A- Peter J. Kuznick bomb decision, the lives it cost and also the lives it saved.”[1] A closer look at Tibbets’s life On November 1, Paul Warfield Tibbets, Jr., the and comparison of his views with those of man who piloted the plane that dropped the others who participated in the atomic bombings atomic bomb on Hiroshima, died at hiswill shed light not only on whether Tibbets was Columbus, Ohio home at age 92. Throughout as humane and thoughtfully reflective as Kamm his adult life, he was a warrior. He bravely suggests, but on why so many World War II fought the Nazis in 1942 and 1943. He fought veterans share Tibbets’s difficulty in moving the Japanese in 1944 and 1945. And he spent beyond official pieties of 1945 and today to the next 62 years fighting to defend the atomic understand the complex history of the end of bombings. the Pacific War, the role the atomic bombings played in the Japanese surrender, and their own role in the historical process.[2] Paul Tibbets was born in Quincy, Illinois on February 23, 1915 and raised mostly in Miami, Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Story: a Documentary
    RESOURCES FILM REVIEWS experience of children. Older the Hiroshima Maidens brought balanced, albeit essentially anec- and more sophisticated viewers to the United States in the 1950s dotal, account of the Hiroshima will want better storytelling for reconstructive plastic catastrophe. The and a more thorough analysis surgery; Sasamura Hiroshi, the For adult viewers, the film of the political, military, and principal of an elementary is unsatisfying. The witnesses, Hidden humanitarian issues than this school; and Masuda Tsutomu, a particularly Ms. Matsubara, sin- film provides. teacher-turned-painter. The Spir- cere as they undoubtedly are, Story The film begins by intro- it of Hiroshima cuts back and seem scripted and wooden. Their ducing us to the Tonai family, an forth among these witnesses, the accounts are poorly integrated A Documentary attractive young couple and their Tonais, and historical images of into the story of the Tonais’ jour- two sons, aged eight and twelve, the bombing. ney and easily overwhelm it, PRODUCED AND DIRECTED who live in present-day Hiroshi- The film tells its story making it seem superfluous. BY RANJANI MAZUMDAR AND SHIKHA JHINGAN ma but who have never been to through children—the Tonai There is little real analysis of the the annual commemoration of boys and the survivors who were reasons why the bomb was WOMEN MAKE MOVIES the atomic bombing on August 6. either children themselves dur- dropped or its long-term signifi- 462 BROADWAY, 5TH FLOOR The Tonais have decided to give ing the war, or teachers working cance. We do not get to know the NEW YORK, NY 10013 their children a history lesson with children.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Resources on Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Atomic Weapons Five College Center for East Asian Studies Smith College
    Additional Resources on Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Atomic Weapons Five College Center for East Asian Studies Smith College, www.fivecolleges.edu/fcceas Books Hiroshima Barefoot Gen, Keiji Nakazawa Death in Life: Survivors of Hiroshima, Robert Lifton Hiroshima, John Hersey Hiroshima Diary: The Journal of a Japanese Physician, Michihiko Hachiya Hiroshima Maidens, Rodney Barker Hiroshima: The Autobiography of Barefoot Gen, Keiji Nakazawa and Richard Minear The Last Cherry Blossom, Kathleen Burkinshaw Memories of Sadako, Okura Kiyo My Hiroshima, Junko Morimoto The Peace Tree from Hiroshima: A Little Bonsai with a Big Story, Sandra Wilds and Kazumi Wilds To Hell and Back: The Last Train from Hiroshima, Charles Pellegrino Nagasaki Nagasaki: Life After Nuclear War, Susan Southard Resurrecting Nagasaki, Chad Diehl Sachiko: A Nagasaki Bomb Survivor’s Story, Caren Stelson A Song for Nagasaki, Fr. Paul Glynn General Atomic Bombing of Japan The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, The Manhatten Engineer District Atomic Cover-Up: Two U.S. Soldiers, Hiroshima & Nagasaki, and the Greatest Movie Never Made, Greg Mitchell First Into Nagasaki: The Censored Eyewitness Dispatches on Post-Atomic Japan and its Prisoners of War, George Weller and Anthony Weller Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Real Story of the Atomic Bombings and Their Aftermath, Paul Ham Other Children of the Occupation: Japan’s Untold Story, Walter Hamilton The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of Women Who Helped Win WWII, Denise Kiernan Japan at War: An Oral History, Haruko Taya Cook and Theodore F. Cook Midnight in Broad Daylight, Pamela Rotner Sakamoto The Nuclear Family, Ari Beser The Sun Gods, Jay Rubin Webinars https://www.fivecolleges.edu/fcceas/webinar/completed_webinars Background for the Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: A Chronology Hiroshima Hibakusha: Sufferings of Survivors, Actions for Peace Japan 1945: A U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Atoms for Peace and the Origins of Nuclear Power in Japan, 1952-1958
    Nuclear Society: Atoms for Peace and the Origins of Nuclear Power in Japan, 1952-1958 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Craig D. Nelson Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: James R. Bartholomew, Adviser Philip C. Brown Christopher A. Reed Copyright by Craig D. Nelson 2014 Abstract This project seeks to explain why Japan developed nuclear power despite its negative experiences with nuclear weapons and fallout. It focuses on the period from the end of the American Occupation in 1952, when the Japanese regained full sovereignty, until the signing of the agreement to import a commercial British nuclear reactor in 1958. The Japanese experience with atomic bombs and radioactive fallout made Japan a seemingly unlikely candidate to develop nuclear power. These fears were renewed following the Lucky Dragon Incident when an American hydrogen bomb test showered a Japanese fishing vessel with radioactive fallout and contaminated deep water tuna throughout the Pacific. Japan, however, had ample reasons to embrace nuclear power as it: provided a potential solutions to Japan’s energy crisis, while offering Japan a way to secure its place in the international community and a means of defining itself as a nation dedicated to scientific, technological, and economic development. Pro-nuclear advocates identified nuclear power as a key to the advancement of Japan, partaking in what Hiromi Mizuno termed “scientific nationalism.” Although Japanese policy makers were interested in the adopting nuclear power before the US offered to extend aid to Japan, the process of doing so was influenced by the American approach to the Cold War and was heavily informed by American efforts to maintain the support of both the government and the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiroshima/Nagasaki Memorial Collection Collection Number: MS-1
    Hiroshima/Nagasaki Memorial Collection Collection Number: MS-1 Title: Hiroshima/Nagasaki Memorial Collection Dates: 1943-2012 Creator: Barbara Reynolds, 1914-1990 Summary/Abstract: The Hiroshima/Nagasaki Memorial Collection houses a variety of documents, including correspondence, photos, slides, 16mm film, books, magazines, and other documents related to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and global peace activism. The collection includes the papers of Barbara and Earle Reynolds, a Japanese language library of books related to the atomic bombings, and an assortment of publications within the genre of global peace activism, including both religious and secular efforts to end conflict and promote cross-cultural understanding. Quantity/Physical Description: Five 4-tier filing cabinets, total of 86.8 cubic feet. Upstairs room for Japanese language library, 57.5 linear feet. Language(s): English, Japanese, Dutch, German Repository: Peace Resource Center, 51 College Way, Wilmington, Ohio 45177 800-341-9318 Restrictions on Access: There are no restrictions on accessing this collection. Restrictions on Use: Copyright restrictions may apply. Unpublished manuscripts are protected by copyright. Permission to publish, quote, or reproduce must be secured from the repository and the copyright holder. Preferred Citation: MS-1, Hiroshima/Nagasaki Memorial Collection, Peace Resource Center, Wilmington College, Wilmington, Ohio. Acquisition: The initial collection was gathered and processed by Barbara Reynolds when she created the Peace Resource Center was founded in 1975. Subsequent directors of the center, including Helen Wiegal, added material according to their interests. Separated Material: At this time there are no known separated materials from this collection. Related Material: The Quaker Heritage Center of Wilmington College houses some 16mm films from the collection.
    [Show full text]