Cronyism's Threat Donald Trump's Maine D. Keith

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cronyism's Threat Donald Trump's Maine D. Keith 20161024_cover61404-postal.qxd 10/18/2016 7:11 PM Page 1 November 7, 2016 $4.99 YUVAL LEVIN ELIANA JOHNSON RICHARD BROOKHISER Cronyism’s Threat Donald Trump’s Maine D. Keith Mano’s Craft The BlueWave DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES ARE THREATENING TO TURN TRADITIONAL RED STATES BLUE. HOW DO REPUBLICANS SURVIVE? TIM ALBERTA www.nationalreview.com base_new_milliken-mar 22.qxd 10/18/2016 1:49 PM Page 1 SMALL BUSINESS IS TOO BIG TO FAIL The Job Creators Network Bring Small Businesses Back Bus tour has been hitting the streets to raise awareness about the plight of small business and the challenges facing American entrepreneurs. Overtaxation, overregulation, and lack of access to credit are stifling our biggest source of new jobs. TO FIND OUT MORE, AND TO SEE HOW YOUR CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS STACK UP IN THE FIGHT FOR SMALL BUSINESS, VISIT DEFENDMAINSTREET.COM TOC_QXP-1127940144.qxp 10/19/2016 2:41 PM Page 1 Contents NOVEMBER 7, 2016 | VOLUME LXVIII, NO. 20 | www.nationalreview.com BOOKS, ARTS ON THE COVER Page 26 & MANNERS The Blue Wave 39 THE FACTS ON IMMIGRATION Republicans have carried Mark Krikorian reviews We Wanted Workers: the white vote in every Unraveling the Immigration general election since 1968. Narrative, by George J. Borjas. But that’s not enough 40 DARK LOYALTIES anymore. The demographic Ronald Radosh reviews True Believer: Stalin’s Last American writing is on the wall; if the Spy, by Kati Marton. GOP continues to repel 42 THE DOWNSIDE OF non-whites, it will cease to ROMNEYISM Jason Willick reviews The Upside Tim Alberta be competitive. of Inequality: How Good Intentions Undermine the COVER: ROMAN GENN Middle Class, by Edward Conard. 44 COLD WAR REDUX ARTICLES John Fund reviews Putin’s Master Plan: To Destroy Europe, MAINE DIVIDED by Eliana Johnson 16 Divide NATO, and Restore Its diverging population is poised to split its electoral votes. Russian Power and Global Influence, by Douglas E. Schoen with TWO FLAWED TAX PLANS by Ramesh Ponnuru 18 Evan Roth Smith. Congress would have to restrain either Clinton or Trump. THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT’S DEMISE by Ian Tuttle 45 BOOKS IN BRIEF 20 Michael Potemra reads about housecats. Now what is needed is an authentic Christian voice. A CASE OF COMPASSION by Matthew Scully 46 FILM: TODAY’S NAT TURNER 22 Ross Douthat reviews The Birth of One woman’s act of mercy invites us to reflect on the suffering of animals. a Nation. THE GIMLET-EYED by Richard Brookhiser 24 47 APPLE-PICKING TIME On the craft of D. Keith Mano. Richard Brookhiser looks for apples. FEATURES THE BLUE WAVE by Tim Alberta 26 SECTIONS Republicans must adapt to a diversifying electorate or lose their influence. THE CRONYIST THREAT by Yuval Levin 2 Letters to the Editor 32 The Week Conservatives should act to restore confidence in free markets. 4 37 Athwart . James Lileks MASTERS OF THE GAME by Kevin D. Williamson 38 The Long View . Rob Long 34 Poetry A word of defense for elitism. 43 . Jennifer Reeser 48 Happy Warrior . Daniel Foster NATIONAL REVIEW (ISSN: 0028-0038) is published bi-weekly, except for the first issue in January, by N ATIONAL REVIEW, Inc., at 215 Lexington Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10016. Periodicals postage paid at New York, N.Y., and additional mailing offices. © National Review, Inc., 2016. Address all editorial mail, manuscripts, letters to the editor, etc., to Editorial Dept., N ATIONAL REVIEW, 215 Lexington Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10016. Address all subscription mail orders, changes of address, undeliverable copies, etc., to NATIONALREVIEW, Circulation Dept., P. O. Box 433015, Palm Coast, Fla. 32143-3015; phone, 386-246-0118, Monday–Friday, 8:00A.M . to 10:30 P.M. Eastern time. Adjustment requests should be accompanied by a current mailing label or facsimile. Direct classified advertising inquiries to: Classifieds Dept., NATIONALREVIEW, 215 Lexington Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10016 or call 212-679- 7330. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to N ATIONAL REVIEW, Circulation Dept., P. O. Box 433015, Palm Coast, Fla. 32143-3015. Printed in the U.S.A. RATES: $59.00 a year (24 issues). Add $21.50 for Canada and other foreign subscriptions, per year. (All payments in U.S. currency.) The editors cannot be responsible for unsolicited manuscripts or artwork unless return postage or, better, a stamped, self-addressed envelope is enclosed. Opinions expressed in signed articles do not necessarily represent the views of the editors. letters-FINAL_QXP-1127940387.qxp 10/19/2016 2:39 PM Page 2 Letters NOVEMBER 7 ISSUE; PRINTED OCTOBER 20 EDITORINCHIEF Richard Lowry Looking the Other Way on Abortion Senior Editors Richard Brookhiser / Jonah Goldberg / Jay Nordlinger Ramesh Ponnuru / David Pryce-Jones Jay Nordlinger’s article “No More Baby” (September 26) concludes that we are a Managing Editor Jason Lee Steorts Literary Editor Michael Potemra “deeply hypocritical society” because we won’t admit that killing a newborn baby is Vice President, Editorial Operations Christopher McEvoy not much different from killing a pre-born baby by abortion. I agree with this conclu- Washington Editor Eliana Johnson Executive Editor Reihan Salam sion, but I believe the hypocrisy goes much deeper. Nordlinger asks whether Emile Roving Correspondent Kevin D. Williamson National Corresponden t John J. Miller Weaver, who was given a life sentence for killing her newborn baby, is “worse—all that Senior Political Correspondent Jim Geraghty much worse—than her counterparts who dispose of their babies earlier and more neatly.” Chief Political Correspondent Tim Alberta Art Director Luba Kolomytseva But by focusing on this question, we avoid other questions that are even more difficult Deputy Managing Editors to face: Are these women “all that much worse” than people who support politicians Nicholas Frankovich / Fred Schwarz Production Editor Katie Hosmer who take pro-abortion positions only because they calculate it will further their career? Assistant to the Editor Rachel Ogden Research Associate Alessandra Trouwborst As their supporters include friends, relatives, members of religious communities, and Contributing Editors possibly someone sitting next to us at dinner, isn’t it more convenient for us to place Shannen Coffin / Ross Douthat / Daniel Foster the blame elsewhere? And is what these supporters do “all that much worse” than our Roman Genn / Arthur L. Herman / Lawrence Kudlow Mark R. Levin / Yuval Levin / Rob Long choice of easy targets in our determination of where blame is placed? Mario Loyola / Jim Manzi / Andrew C. McCarthy Kate O’Beirne / Andrew Stuttaford / Robert VerBruggen Joseph Mirra NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE Editor Charles C. W. Cooke Bronx, N.Y. Managing Editors Katherine Connell / Edward John Craig Deputy Managing Editor Nat Brown National-Affairs Columnist John Fund Merit-Based Education Reform Staff Writer David French Senior Political Reporter Alexis Levinson Reporter Katherine Timpf Rarely do we hear intelligent solutions to the problem of America’s failing educational Assoc iate Editors Molly Powell / Nick Tell system—even from reformers, who get caught up in the “golden goose” approach of Digital Director Ericka Andersen Assistant Editor Mark Antonio Wright alighting on a single issue. Frederick M. Hess’s “Ten Priorities for Education Policy” Technical Services Russell Jenkins Web Editorial Assistant Grant DeArmitt (October 24), however, is a practical and rational approach to the entire issue. While Web Developer Wendy Weihs teaching in one of the school systems Hess mentioned—Baltimore’s—I had the plea- Web Producer Scott McKim sure of working with fine teachers (and some not-so-fine), but I left, like many others, EDITORS- AT- L A RG E Linda Bridges / Kathryn Jean Lopez / John O’Sullivan because of the shortcomings to which Hess intelligently proposes solutions. NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE Most insightful of all, Hess suggests to “permit for-profit educators to compete on THOMASL. RHODESFELLOW Ian Tuttle their merits.” This was the marrow of education—of all true learning—from the appearance of the human race on the planet until the late 1800s, when schooling BUCKLEYFELLOWSINPOLITICALJOURNALISM Alexandra DeSanctis / Austin Yack became mandatory. Merit-based, “boutique” education was, on the whole, vastly more Contributors effective, cost-efficient, and entertaining to students and teachers alike. I would add to Hadley Arkes / James Bowman / Eliot A. Cohen this homeschooling and “unschooling,” which have recently proven to be extremely Dinesh D’Souza / Chester E. Finn Jr. / Neal B. Freeman James Gardner / David Gelernter / George Gilder effective means of education. These small centers of true learning should receive the Jeffrey Hart / Kevin A. Hassett / Charles R. Kesler David Klinghoffer / Anthony Lejeune / Michael Novak benefit of tax breaks, freedom from governmental meddling, and a general approbation Alan Reynolds / Tracy Lee Simmons from the vox populi—for their efficiency, and for their great virtue of relieving an over- Terry Teachout / Vin Weber Chief Financial Officer James X. Kilbridge stressed system and an overtaxed people. Accounting Manager Galina Veyg man Accountant Lyudmila Bolotinskaya Business Services Alex Batey John C. Young Circulation Manager Jason Ng Pensacola, Fla. Advertising Director Jim Fowler Advertising Manager Kevin Longstreet Assistant to the Publisher Brooke Rogers CORRECTIONS Director of Revenue Erik Netcher PUBLISHERCHAIRMAN In “Russia’s Bloody Tsar” (August 15), David Satter wrote that in May 2007, when he Jack Fowler John Hillen testified before the House Foreign Relations Committee about the 1999 Russian apart- FOUNDER William F. Buckley Jr. ment bombings, he was the only person publicly accusing the Russian government of involvement who had not been killed. He mentioned Alexander Litvinenko, the author PATRONS AND BENEFACTORS Robert Agostinelli of Blowing Up Russia, as one of the victims but did not note that Mr. Litvinenko’s co- Dale Brott Mr. and Mrs. Michael Conway author, Yuri Felshtinsky is, we are pleased to say, alive and very well. Mark and Mary Davis Virginia James Christopher M.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 the Right-Wing Media Enablers of Anti-Islam Propaganda
    Chapter 4 The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda Spreading anti-Muslim hate in America depends on a well-developed right-wing media echo chamber to amplify a few marginal voices. The think tank misinforma- tion experts and grassroots and religious-right organizations profiled in this report boast a symbiotic relationship with a loosely aligned, ideologically-akin group of right-wing blogs, magazines, radio stations, newspapers, and television news shows to spread their anti-Islam messages and myths. The media outlets, in turn, give members of this network the exposure needed to amplify their message, reach larger audiences, drive fundraising numbers, and grow their membership base. Some well-established conservative media outlets are a key part of this echo cham- ber, mixing coverage of alarmist threats posed by the mere existence of Muslims in America with other news stories. Chief among the media partners are the Fox News empire,1 the influential conservative magazine National Review and its website,2 a host of right-wing radio hosts, The Washington Times newspaper and website,3 and the Christian Broadcasting Network and website.4 They tout Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steven Emerson, and others as experts, and invite supposedly moderate Muslim and Arabs to endorse bigoted views. In so doing, these media organizations amplify harm- ful, anti-Muslim views to wide audiences. (See box on page 86) In this chapter we profile some of the right-wing media enablers, beginning with the websites, then hate radio, then the television outlets. The websites A network of right-wing websites and blogs are frequently the primary movers of anti-Muslim messages and myths.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodicalspov.Pdf
    “Consider the Source” A Resource Guide to Liberal, Conservative and Nonpartisan Periodicals 30 East Lake Street ∙ Chicago, IL 60601 HWC Library – Room 501 312.553.5760 ver heard the saying “consider the source” in response to something that was questioned? Well, the same advice applies to what you read – consider the source. When conducting research, bear in mind that periodicals (journals, magazines, newspapers) may have varying points-of-view, biases, and/or E political leanings. Here are some questions to ask when considering using a periodical source: Is there a bias in the publication or is it non-partisan? Who is the sponsor (publisher or benefactor) of the publication? What is the agenda of the sponsor – to simply share information or to influence social or political change? Some publications have specific political perspectives and outright state what they are, as in Dissent Magazine (self-described as “a magazine of the left”) or National Review’s boost of, “we give you the right view and back it up.” Still, there are other publications that do not clearly state their political leanings; but over time have been deemed as left- or right-leaning based on such factors as the points- of-view of their opinion columnists, the make-up of their editorial staff, and/or their endorsements of politicians. Many newspapers fall into this rather opaque category. A good rule of thumb to use in determining whether a publication is liberal or conservative has been provided by Media Research Center’s L. Brent Bozell III: “if the paper never met a conservative cause it didn’t like, it’s conservative, and if it never met a liberal cause it didn’t like, it’s liberal.” Outlined in the following pages is an annotated listing of publications that have been categorized as conservative, liberal, non-partisan and religious.
    [Show full text]
  • Juliana Geran Pilon Education
    JULIANA GERAN PILON [email protected] Dr. Juliana Geran Pilon is Research Professor of Politics and Culture and Earhart Fellow at the Institute of World Politics. For the previous two years, she taught in the Political Science Department at St. Mary’s College of Maryland. From January 1991 to October 2002, she was first Director of Programs, Vice President for Programs, and finally Senior Advisor for Civil Society at the International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES), after three years at the National Forum Foundation, a non-profit institution that focused on foreign policy issues - now part of Freedom House - where she was first Executive Director and then Vice President. At NFF, she assisted in creating a network of several hundred young political activists in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. For the past thirteen years she has also taught at Johns Hopkins University, the Institute of World Politics, George Washington University, and the Institute of World Politics. From 1981 to 1988, she was a Senior Policy Analyst at the Heritage Foundation, writing on the United Nations, Soviet active measures, terrorism, East-West trade, and other international issues. In 1991, she received an Earhart Foundation fellowship for her second book, The Bloody Flag: Post-Communist Nationalism in Eastern Europe -- Spotlight on Romania, published by Transaction, Rutgers University Press. Her autobiographical book Notes From the Other Side of Night was published by Regnery/Gateway, Inc. in 1979, and translated into Romanian in 1993, where it was published by Editura de Vest. A paperback edition appeared in the U.S. in May 1994, published by the University Press of America.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discursive Construction of SJW Memes As the Monstrous Feminine
    Feminist Media Studies ISSN: 1468-0777 (Print) 1471-5902 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rfms20 Attack of the 50-foot social justice warrior: the discursive construction of SJW memes as the monstrous feminine Adrienne L. Massanari & Shira Chess To cite this article: Adrienne L. Massanari & Shira Chess (2018): Attack of the 50-foot social justice warrior: the discursive construction of SJW memes as the monstrous feminine, Feminist Media Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14680777.2018.1447333 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447333 Published online: 21 Mar 2018. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rfms20 FEMINIST MEDIA STUDIES, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447333 Attack of the 50-foot social justice warrior: the discursive construction of SJW memes as the monstrous feminine Adrienne L. Massanaria and Shira Chessb aDepartment of Communication, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA; bGrady College of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS This essay considers the origin and meaning of “social justice warrior” Social justice warrior; SJW; (SJW) memes. Despite each term within the phrase suggesting memes; alt-right; monstrous potentially positive connotations, we argue that as deployed within feminine “alt-right” communities, it implies a kind of monstrous feminine: a woman who is unwieldy and out of control. We catalogue and analyze this meme using a visual discourse analysis of texts gathered through Google Images and Reddit.
    [Show full text]
  • “No Left, No Right – Only the Game”
    “No Left, No Right – Only the Game” A Netnographic Study of the Online Community r/KotakuInAction Master of Arts: Media and Communication Studies – Culture, Collaborative Media, and Creative Industries Master’s Thesis (Two-year) | 15 credits Student: Oskar Larsson Supervisor: Maria Brock Year: 2021 Word Count: 15,937 Abstract This thesis examines how 'othering' discourse can be used to construct and negotiate boundaries and shape collective identities within online spaces. Through a mixed-method approach of thematic analysis and a netnographic study, and by drawing on theoretical concepts of online othering and identity formation, this thesis explores how the Gamergate community r/KotakuInAction can be understood in relation to Gamergate, the Alt-Right and society at large. The results show that the community perceive and construct the SJW as a common adversary – a monstrous representation of feminism, progressiveness and political correctness. The analysis also revealed how racist rhetorics and white male anxieties characterize the communitys' othering discourse. Through an in-depth study of user-submitted comment, this thesis argues that r/KotakuInAction's collective identity is fluid and reactionary in nature, characterized by a discourse that is indicative of Alt-Right ideology and white male supremacy. Future research should further explore the network of communities that r/KotakuInAction is part of, as well as examine how the community transform over time. Keywords: Gamergate, Reddit, Alt-Right, Online Othering, Collective Identity,
    [Show full text]
  • Are Texans Being Denied Access to a Vital Medicine? a Scientific Assessment of Marijuana
    Are Texans Being DENIED ACCESS to a VITAL MEDICINE? A Scientific Assessment of Marijuana This booklet may be reproduced in total for free distribution. PDF files are available at http://www.DPFT.org Introduction The goal of the Drug Policy Forum of Texas (DPFT) is to minimize the damage done to society by both drug abuse and poorly conceived drug laws. To that end we provide scientific information and expert opinion while promoting discussion of what might be more effective alternatives to our current drug policies. Members may differ on the best answers. We hold the traditional view that unrestricted debate and a well informed public are essential elements of democracy. DPFT does not advocate or encourage the recreational use of illegal or legal drugs. Our members are simply concerned citizens from no particular political or social group, but we’re fortunate to include many experts among our leaders and advisors. Executive Director, Dr. G. Alan Robison, is a National Academy of Sciences award winning pharmacologist, Dr. Fred Murad recently won the Nobel prize for medicine and Dr. Susan Robbins teaches a national award-winning TV course on “Drugs and Society.” We work closely with many other experts here and around the world. We welcome you to join us. This booklet addresses one element of drug policy, the use of marijuana as medicine. Federal policy seems oddly schizophrenic in that since 1978 the federal government has grown, and mailed some 300 marijuana cigarettes a month to a handful of patients who had to prove to the satisfaction of three government agencies (DEA, FDA and NIDA) that marijuana was an essential element in their treatment, yet has closed the program to new entrants since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • "If You're Ugly, the Blackpill Is Born with You": Sexual Hierarchies, Identity Construction, and Masculinity on an Incel Forum Board
    University of Dayton eCommons Joyce Durham Essay Contest in Women's and Gender Studies Women's and Gender Studies Program 2020 "If You're Ugly, the Blackpill is Born with You": Sexual Hierarchies, Identity Construction, and Masculinity on an Incel Forum Board Josh Segalewicz University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/wgs_essay Part of the Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons eCommons Citation Segalewicz, Josh, ""If You're Ugly, the Blackpill is Born with You": Sexual Hierarchies, Identity Construction, and Masculinity on an Incel Forum Board" (2020). Joyce Durham Essay Contest in Women's and Gender Studies. 20. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/wgs_essay/20 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Women's and Gender Studies Program at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Joyce Durham Essay Contest in Women's and Gender Studies by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. "If You're Ugly, the Blackpill is Born with You": Sexual Hierarchies, Identity Construction, and Masculinity on an Incel Forum Board by Josh Segalewicz Honorable Mention 2020 Joyce Durham Essay Contest in Women's and Gender Studies "If You're Ugly, The Blackpill is Born With You": Sexual Hierarchies, Identity Construction, and Masculinity on an Incel Forum Board Abstract: The manosphere is one new digital space where antifeminists and men's rights activists interact outside of their traditional social networks. Incels, short for involuntary celibates, exist in this space and have been labeled as extreme misogynists, white supremacists, and domestic terrorists.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Liberty for a Select Few the Justice Department Is Promoting Discrimination Across the Federal Government
    GETTY MAY IMAGES/CHERISS Religious Liberty for a Select Few The Justice Department Is Promoting Discrimination Across the Federal Government By Sharita Gruberg, Frank J. Bewkes, Elizabeth Platt, Katherine Franke, and Claire Markham April 2018 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Religious Liberty for a Select Few The Justice Department Is Promoting Discrimination Across the Federal Government By Sharita Gruberg, Frank J. Bewkes, Elizabeth Platt, Katherine Franke, and Claire Markham April 2018 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Jeff Sessions’ religious liberty guidance is a solution in search of a problem 5 The guidance misinterprets constitutional and statutory religious liberty protections 9 The guidance’s impact will be far-reaching and expensive 18 Conclusion 20 About the authors 22 Endnotes Introduction and summary In its first year, the Trump administration has systematically redefined and expanded the right to religious exemptions, creating broad carve-outs to a host of vital health, labor, and antidiscrimination protections. On May 4, 2017—the National Day of Prayer—during a ceremony outside the White House, President Donald Trump signed an executive order on “Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty.” At the time, the executive order was reported to be a “major triumph” for Vice President Mike Pence, who, as governor of Indiana, famously signed a religious exemption law that would have opened the door to anti-LGBTQ discrimination.1 Among its other directives, the order instructed Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “issue guidance interpreting
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNSHIP RESOURCES and HELPFUL SEARCH LINKS These Sites Allow You to Do Advanced Searches for Internships Nationwide
    CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE OFFICE OF CAREER & LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT 2017 INTERNSHIP LIST New Jobs…………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Politics/Non-profit…………………………………………………………………... 3 Public Policy/Non-profit …………………………………………………………... 5 Business……………………………………………………………………………... 10 Journalism and Media ……………………………………………………………… 11 Catholic/Pro-Life/Religious Freedom ……………………………………………… 13 Academic/Student Conferences and Fellowships ………………………………….. 14 Other ………………………………………………………………………………... 15 Internship Resources and Search Links …………………………………………….. 16 Please note: this is not meant to be exhaustive list, nor are all internships endorsed by Christendom College or the Office of Career Development. Many of the internships below are in the Metropolitan DC area, but there are thousands of internships available around the country. Use the resources on pg. 16 to do a search by field and location. Questions? Need help with your resume, cover letter, or composing an email? Contact Colleen Harmon: [email protected] ** Indicates alumni have or currently do work at this location. If you plan to apply to these internships, please let Colleen know so she can notify them. 1 NEW JOBS! National Journalism Center- summer deadline March 20 The National Journalism Center, a project of Young America's Foundation, provides aspiring conservative and libertarian journalists with the premier opportunity to learn the principles and practice of responsible reporting. The National Journalism Center combines 12 weeks of on-the- job training at a Washington, D.C.-based media outlet and once-weekly training seminars led by prominent journalists, policy experts, and NJC faculty. The program matches interns with print, broadcast, or online media outlets based on their interests and experience. Interns spend 30 hours/week gaining practical, hands-on journalism experience. Potential placements include The Washington Times, The Washington Examiner, CNN, Fox News Channel, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Judicial Minimalism: Abortion Politics, Party Polarization, and the Consequences of Returning the Constitution to Elected Government Neal Devins
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 69 | Issue 4 Article 3 5-2016 Rethinking Judicial Minimalism: Abortion Politics, Party Polarization, and the Consequences of Returning the Constitution to Elected Government Neal Devins Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Neal Devins, Rethinking Judicial Minimalism: Abortion Politics, Party Polarization, and the Consequences of Returning the Constitution to Elected Government, 69 Vanderbilt Law Review 935 (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol69/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rethinking Judicial Minimalism: Abortion Politics, Party Polarization, and the Consequences of Returning the Constitution to Elected Government Neal Devins* IN TROD U CTION ............................................................................... 935 I. MINIMALISM THEORY AND ABORTION ................................. 939 II. WHAT ABORTION POLITICS TELLS US ABOUT JUDICIAL M INIMALISM ........................................................ 946 A . R oe v. W ade ............................................................. 947 B . From Roe to Casey ................................................... 953 C. Casey and Beyond ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM To: Senate Democrats From: Senate Health
    MEMORANDUM To: Senate Democrats From: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Staff Re: President Trump’s Appointments at HHS: A Dangerous Direction for Women’s Health Date: June 5, 2017 As you have seen, President Trump has appointed Charmaine Yoest as Assistant Secretary of Public Affairs and Teresa Manning as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), where serve as the lead policy experts on a number of programs and services that affect women’s health. Both positions are appointments made at the pleasure of the President and do not require the advice and consent of the Senate. Alarmingly, these two individuals are among the most outspoken opponents nationally of programs, policies, and practices that advance women’s access to healthcare, and both have dedicated their careers to opposing constitutionally-protected reproductive health care, including safe, legal abortion. We write to make sure you are aware of the extreme degree to which, over the course of their careers, Ms. Yoest and Ms. Manning have prioritized undermining women’s access to basic healthcare services like family planning services and have sought to roll back women’s reproductive rights—including by spreading misinformation. Ms. Yoest and Ms. Manning’s goals run directly counter to the Department’s mission to “enhance and protect the health and well-being of all Americans,” and the missions of the programs and offices they directly oversee and lead for the country. Their appointments can and will only accelerate President Trump and Vice President Pence’s plans to roll back women’s health, undermine past progress toward LGBTQ equality, and move HHS in a dangerous direction.1 As Congressional Democrats continue efforts to counter the Trump Administration’s deeply harmful approach toward women’s health and rights, close oversight of HHS’s actions under this Administration remain critical.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gilder Lehrman Collection
    the Gilder Lehrman institute of american history the Gilder Lehrman institute of american history 19 west 44th street, suite 500 new york, ny 10036 646-366-9666 www.gilderlehrman.org Annual Report 2001 Board of Advisors Co-Chairmen Richard Gilder Lewis E. Lehrman President James G. Basker Executive Director Lesley S. Herrmann Advisory Board Dear Board Members and Friends, Joyce O. Appleby, Professor of History Emerita, James O. Horton, Benjamin Banneker Professor University of California Los Angeles of American Studies and History, George We present the Institute’s annual report for 2001, a year in which William F. Baker, President, Channel Thirteen/WNET Washington University Thomas H. Bender, University Professor of the Kenneth T. Jackson, Jacques Barzun Professor the study of American history took on a new importance. Our Humanities, New York University of History, Columbia University and President, activities continue to expand, and we look forward to significant Lewis W. Bernard, Chairman, Classroom Inc. New-York Historical Society David W. Blight, Class of 1959 Professor of History Daniel P. Jordan, President, Thomas Jefferson growth in 2002. and Black Studies, Amherst College Memorial Foundation Gabor S. Boritt, Robert C. Fluhrer Professor of David M. Kennedy, Donald J. McLachlan Professor Civil War Studies, Gettysburg College of History, Stanford University (co-chair, Advisory Board) Roger G. Kennedy, Director Emeritus, Richard Brookhiser, Senior Editor, National Review National Park Service James G. Basker Lesley S. Herrmann Kenneth L. Burns, Filmmaker Roger Kimball, Managing Editor, The New Criterion President Executive Director David B. Davis, Sterling Professor of History Emeritus, Richard C. Levin, President, Yale University Yale University (co-chair, Advisory Board) James M.
    [Show full text]