PHONETIC Vs. PHONOLOGICAL LENGTHENING in AFFRICATES

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PHONETIC Vs. PHONOLOGICAL LENGTHENING in AFFRICATES UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2007) PHONETIC vs. PHONOLOGICAL LENGTHENING IN AFFRICATES Anne Pycha University of California, Berkeley [email protected] ABSTRACT root is suffixed, as in vason [va5on] ‘iron- Affricate consonants consist of two portions: SUPERESSIVE’). stop closure and frication. Can these portions play We can also compare the duration of [5] when it different roles in phonetic and phonological is singleton versus when it is geminate. In processes? In this study, I address the question by Hungarian, the instrumental case suffix -al triggers probing the behavior of Hungarian affricates under gemination when it attaches to a noun root: baj lengthening. I measure the duration changes that ‘trouble’, bajjal ‘trouble-INSTR’; vas ‘iron’, vassal affricates undergo in two types of lengthening ‘iron-INSTR’, etc. To get an idea of how processes: first, a phonetic process of final phonological lengthening operates, then, we can lengthening and second, a phonological process of compare the duration of [5] when it is singleton gemination. I show that these two processes alter (with plain suffix, as in vason [va5on]) with its the internal structure of affricates in very different duration when it is geminate (with geminating ways. The results suggest that the difference between phonetic and phonological processes is in suffix, as in vassal [va5:al]). fact deeper than a mere difference between We might reasonably expect phonetic “gradient” and “categorical” effects. lengthening to be smaller and more variable than phonological lengthening, which would suggest Keywords: affricates, geminates, Hungarian that the two processes lie along a continuum of sorts. If we introduce affricates into the picture, 1. INTRODUCTION however, we have the potential to uncover deeper Consonants can lengthen as the result of their differences. This is because affricates consist of position in a syllable, word or phrase. This finding two portions, stop closure and frication. While has been demonstrated for a number of different there is disagreement as to how these portions are languages [1]. For example, consonants at the best represented underlyingly [2], all theories agree beginning or end of a word tend to be longer than that the structure of affricates is more complex those which are medial. Such processes are than that of simple segments. typically considered to be gradient and phonetic, The null hypothesis is that phonetic and because they do not alter the phonemic status of phonological lengthening treat the complex the consonant. structure of the affricate in the same manner: for Consonants can also lengthen as the result of example, by lengthening both portions to a certain morpho-phonological conditioning. For example, a degree. If, on the contrary, phonetic lengthening suffix that triggers gemination will lengthen the specifically targets one portion of the affricate final consonant of the root to which it attaches. while phonological lengthening targets another, Such a process is typically considered categorical this suggests that the former is not merely a and phonological, because the phonemic status of gradient version of the latter. the consonant changes from singleton to geminate. To pursue this question, the present study Both lengthening processes affect the edges of analyzes phonetic and phonological duration roots or words, which means that we can study changes in stops, fricatives, and affricates in them in tandem. Consider the Hungarian root vas Hungarian. [va5] ‘iron’, which may occur in isolation or with 2. METHODS suffixes. To get an idea of how phonetic lengthening operates, we can compare the duration Stimuli, from [3], were constructed using a set of of [5] when it is word-final (when the root is bare) monosyllabic and disyllabic Hungarian noun roots with its duration when it is word-medial (when the ending in one of two affricates /ts, t5/ or one of 269 UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2007) three simple consonants /t, s, 5/. The root-final just before the release burst. Fricatives (and consonants occurred in four different syllable fricative portions of affricates) began at the onset types: CVC, CVNC, CV:C, and CV:NC, giving of aperiodic energy, and ended at the cessation of rise to a total of eight root shapes. The vowel of the aperiodic energy. Breathy offset at the end of final syllable was always /a/. words was not included in segment durations. We will be concerned with two comparisons. Table 1: Root shapes used in stimulus construction To examine final lengthening effects, we will Monosyllable Disyllable compare the target consonants in word-medial (CV).CVC /kat5/ /pamat5/ versus word-final environments ([kat5on] versus (CV).CVNC /mant5/ /parant5/ [kat5]). To examine gemination effects, we will (CV).(C)V:C /a:t5/ /tana:t5/ compare the target consonants in singleton and (CV).CV:NC /ga:nt5/ /zoma:nt5/ geminate environments ([kat5on] versus [katt5al]). Note that vowel length differences do not correlate 3. RESULTS with consonant length differences in Hungarian. Stress is always on the first syllable. 3.1. Final lengthening The root list was initially designed to contain 5 root-final consonant types x 8 word shapes x 2 Overall, results suggest that final lengthening repetitions of each shape = 80 roots. Because of targets the fricative portion of an affricate. Figure 1 gaps in the lexicon of Hungarian (for example, shows mean durations for stops, fricatives, and there is no monosyllabic noun root with the shape affricates in word medial and final positions. In this and subsequent graphs, T represents stops or Ca:n ), the final number of roots was 63. 5 stop portions of affricates, S represents fricatives To construct the stimuli, each noun root was placed in three environments: bare (unsuffixed), or fricative portions of affricates (/s/ and /5/ are suffixed with a plain case ending (Superessive pooled together), and TS represents affricates (/ts/ -on), or suffixed with a geminating case ending and /t5/ are pooled together). Paired t-tests (p < (Instrumental -al). 0.05) indicate that the fricatives lengthen significantly in the word-final environment (mean Table 2: Three environments for roots increase 39.3 ms), as do the affricates (36.2 ms). Bare Plain suffix -on Geminating suffix -al Stops, however, do not. /t at/ /t aton/ /t attal/ 5 5 5 Figure 1: Mean duration of stops (T), fricatives (S), /va5/ /va5on/ /va55al/ and affricates (TS) in medial (m) and final (f) /kat5/ /kat5on/ /katt5al/ environments, in milliseconds Each word (63 roots x 3 environments=189) 250 was embedded in a quoted phrase within a carrier 200 sentence Marika azt mondta hogy “X” gyorsan, * * “Marika said ‘X’ quickly”. For bare roots, this 150 context should trigger both phrase-final and word- final lengthening, maximizing the phonetic effect. 100 The order of sentences was randomized, and fillers 50 interspersed throughout. Three native speakers of Tm Tf Sm Sf TSm TSf Hungarian (2 female, 1 male) read each list (189 0 words x 3 speakers = 567 tokens total). They were instructed to pronounce the sentences in a casual Looking inside the affricates, we see that the manner. Recording took place using a head- durations of the stop and fricative portions change mounted microphone and Marantz digital recorder. by different amounts (Fig. 2). While the stop Segmentation took place in Praat, using portion shows a small, insignificant increase in waveforms and spectrograms. Stops (and stop duration, the fricative portion shows a substantial, portions of affricates) began when the preceding significant increase (mean 33.8 ms, p <0.05). vowel displayed no more periodicity, and ended 270 UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2007) Figure 2: Within affricates: Mean duration of stop and Paired t-tests (p < 0.05) indicate that all three fricative portions in medial and final environments, ms consonant types lengthen significantly (mean increase for stops: 69.9 ms; for fricatives: 43.9 ms; 140 for affricates: 38.1 ms). 120 Figure 4: Mean duration of consonants in singleton 100 * (s) and geminate (g) environments, ms 80 60 250 40 200 20 * * * Tm Tf Sm Sf 150 0 Duration ratios paint a roughly similar picture 100 of final lengthening for affricates. Ratios were 50 calculated by dividing the duration of the target by Ts Tg Ss Sg TSs TSg the total duration of the final VC sequence in the 0 root. Thus for kacs [kat5] ‘fringe’, the ratio for stop Looking inside the affricates, we see that the portion of the affricate is [t]/[at5]. A value of 0.25 durations of the stop and fricative portions again indicates that the [t] takes up 25% of this total change by different amounts (Fig. 5), but the duration. changes are not the same as what we saw with final Figure 3 shows duration ratios for simple lengthening. While the fricative portion shows a segments T and S, and for the T and S portions of very small increase in duration (mean 6.1 ms, p < affricates. Shading indicates the percentage that the 0.05), the stop portion shows a substantial increase target occupies in word-medial position, while (mean 33.0 ms, p <0.05). black indicates the relative increase (or decrease) Figure 5: Within affricates: Mean duration of closure in percentage that takes place in word-final and frication in singleton and geminate environments position. Under this calculation, the fricative portion of affricates is the only item that lengthens, 140 by a mean of 5.0%. Stop portion of affricates, as well as plain stops, actually shorten somewhat, and 120 plain fricatives do not exhibit any change at all. 100 This is probably due to the fact that the vowel in a * * VC sequence can also lengthen word-finally. 80 Figure 3: Target duration in medial (shaded) and final 60 environments (shaded + black), as percent of final VC 40 20 Simple T Ts Tg Ss Sg 0 Simple S Duration ratios included more segments for the Affricate T singleton-to-geminate comparison than for the medial-to-final comparison.
Recommended publications
  • Mehri Ejective Fricatives: an Acoustic Study Rachid Ridouane, Cédric Gendrot, Rajesh Khatiwada
    Mehri ejective fricatives: an acoustic study Rachid Ridouane, Cédric Gendrot, Rajesh Khatiwada To cite this version: Rachid Ridouane, Cédric Gendrot, Rajesh Khatiwada. Mehri ejective fricatives: an acoustic study. 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Aug 2015, Glasgow, United Kingdom. halshs- 01287685 HAL Id: halshs-01287685 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01287685 Submitted on 15 Mar 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Mehri ejective fricatives: an acoustic study Rachid Ridouane, Cédric Gendrot, Rajesh Khatiwada Laboratoire de Phonétique et Phonologie (CNRS/Sorbonne Nouvelle), Paris ABSTRACT sequence of a pulmonic fricative followed by a glottal stop [3]. The second strategy, observed in Ejective consonants are not very common cross- Tlingit, was to produce ejective fricatives with a linguistically. Even less common is the occurrence much narrower constriction than was used in their of ejective fricatives. This infrequency is generally pulmonic counterparts [4]. This allowed for glottal attributed to the incompatibility of two aerodynamic closure to overlap the entire frication duration while requirements: a continuing flow of air to create noise producing high intra-oral pressure, suggesting that frication and an increasing intraoral air pressure to they were indeed ejective fricatives.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Description of Consonants in Modern Standard Arabic
    Linguistics and Literature Studies 2(7): 185-189, 2014 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/lls.2014.020702 A Brief Description of Consonants in Modern Standard Arabic Iram Sabir*, Nora Alsaeed Al-Jouf University, Sakaka, KSA *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Copyright © 2014 Horizon Research Publishing All rights reserved. Abstract The present study deals with “A brief Modern Standard Arabic. This study starts from an description of consonants in Modern Standard Arabic”. This elucidation of the phonetic bases of sounds classification. At study tries to give some information about the production of this point shows the first limit of the study that is basically Arabic sounds, the classification and description of phonetic rather than phonological description of sounds. consonants in Standard Arabic, then the definition of the This attempt of classification is followed by lists of the word consonant. In the present study we also investigate the consonant sounds in Standard Arabic with a key word for place of articulation in Arabic consonants we describe each consonant. The criteria of description are place and sounds according to: bilabial, labio-dental, alveolar, palatal, manner of articulation and voicing. The attempt of velar, uvular, and glottal. Then the manner of articulation, description has been made to lead to the drawing of some the characteristics such as phonation, nasal, curved, and trill. fundamental conclusion at the end of the paper. The aim of this study is to investigate consonant in MSA taking into consideration that all 28 consonants of Arabic alphabets. As a language Arabic is one of the most 2.
    [Show full text]
  • LINGUISTICS 221 LECTURE #3 the BASIC SOUNDS of ENGLISH 1. STOPS a Stop Consonant Is Produced with a Complete Closure of Airflow
    LINGUISTICS 221 LECTURE #3 Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology THE BASIC SOUNDS OF ENGLISH 1. STOPS A stop consonant is produced with a complete closure of airflow in the vocal tract; the air pressure has built up behind the closure; the air rushes out with an explosive sound when released. The term plosive is also used for oral stops. ORAL STOPS: e.g., [b] [t] (= plosives) NASAL STOPS: e.g., [m] [n] (= nasals) There are three phases of stop articulation: i. CLOSING PHASE (approach or shutting phase) The articulators are moving from an open state to a closed state; ii. CLOSURE PHASE (= occlusion) Blockage of the airflow in the oral tract; iii. RELEASE PHASE Sudden reopening; it may be accompanied by a burst of air. ORAL STOPS IN ENGLISH a. BILABIAL STOPS: The blockage is made with the two lips. spot [p] voiceless baby [b] voiced 1 b. ALVEOLAR STOPS: The blade (or the tip) of the tongue makes a closure with the alveolar ridge; the sides of the tongue are along the upper teeth. lamino-alveolar stops or Check your apico-alveolar stops pronunciation! stake [t] voiceless deep [d] voiced c. VELAR STOPS: The closure is between the back of the tongue (= dorsum) and the velum. dorso-velar stops scar [k] voiceless goose [g] voiced 2. NASALS (= nasal stops) The air is stopped in the oral tract, but the velum is lowered so that the airflow can go through the nasal tract. All nasals are voiced. NASALS IN ENGLISH a. BILABIAL NASAL: made [m] b. ALVEOLAR NASAL: need [n] c.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Processes
    Phonological Processes Phonological processes are patterns of articulation that are developmentally appropriate in children learning to speak up until the ages listed below. PHONOLOGICAL PROCESS DESCRIPTION AGE ACQUIRED Initial Consonant Deletion Omitting first consonant (hat → at) Consonant Cluster Deletion Omitting both consonants of a consonant cluster (stop → op) 2 yrs. Reduplication Repeating syllables (water → wawa) Final Consonant Deletion Omitting a singleton consonant at the end of a word (nose → no) Unstressed Syllable Deletion Omitting a weak syllable (banana → nana) 3 yrs. Affrication Substituting an affricate for a nonaffricate (sheep → cheep) Stopping /f/ Substituting a stop for /f/ (fish → tish) Assimilation Changing a phoneme so it takes on a characteristic of another sound (bed → beb, yellow → lellow) 3 - 4 yrs. Velar Fronting Substituting a front sound for a back sound (cat → tat, gum → dum) Backing Substituting a back sound for a front sound (tap → cap) 4 - 5 yrs. Deaffrication Substituting an affricate with a continuant or stop (chip → sip) 4 yrs. Consonant Cluster Reduction (without /s/) Omitting one or more consonants in a sequence of consonants (grape → gape) Depalatalization of Final Singles Substituting a nonpalatal for a palatal sound at the end of a word (dish → dit) 4 - 6 yrs. Stopping of /s/ Substituting a stop sound for /s/ (sap → tap) 3 ½ - 5 yrs. Depalatalization of Initial Singles Substituting a nonpalatal for a palatal sound at the beginning of a word (shy → ty) Consonant Cluster Reduction (with /s/) Omitting one or more consonants in a sequence of consonants (step → tep) Alveolarization Substituting an alveolar for a nonalveolar sound (chew → too) 5 yrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Introduction to The
    PREVIEW OF THE IPA HANDBOOK Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet PARTI Introduction to the IPA 1. What is the International Phonetic Alphabet? The aim of the International Phonetic Association is to promote the scientific study of phonetics and the various practical applications of that science. For both these it is necessary to have a consistent way of representing the sounds of language in written form. From its foundation in 1886 the Association has been concerned to develop a system of notation which would be convenient to use, but comprehensive enough to cope with the wide variety of sounds found in the languages of the world; and to encourage the use of thjs notation as widely as possible among those concerned with language. The system is generally known as the International Phonetic Alphabet. Both the Association and its Alphabet are widely referred to by the abbreviation IPA, but here 'IPA' will be used only for the Alphabet. The IPA is based on the Roman alphabet, which has the advantage of being widely familiar, but also includes letters and additional symbols from a variety of other sources. These additions are necessary because the variety of sounds in languages is much greater than the number of letters in the Roman alphabet. The use of sequences of phonetic symbols to represent speech is known as transcription. The IPA can be used for many different purposes. For instance, it can be used as a way to show pronunciation in a dictionary, to record a language in linguistic fieldwork, to form the basis of a writing system for a language, or to annotate acoustic and other displays in the analysis of speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasal Consonant the Basic Characteristic of a Nasal Consonant Is That the Air Escapes Through the Nose
    Nasal Consonant The basic characteristic of a nasal consonant is that the air escapes through the nose. For this to happen, the soft palate must be lowered; in the case of all the other consonants, and all vowels, the soft palate is raised and air cannot pass through the nose, in nasal consonants, hoever, the air does not pass through the mouth; it is prevented by a complete closure in the mouth at some point. /m/ and /n/ are simple , straightforward consonants with distributions like those of the plosives. There is in fact little to describe. However, /η/ is a different matter. It is a sound that gives considerable problems to foreign learners, and one that is so unusual in its phonological aspect that some people argue that it is not one of the phonemes of English at all. There are three phonemes in English which are represented by nasal consonants, /m/ , /n/ and /η/. In all nasal consonants the soft palate is lowered and at the same time the mouth passage blocked at some point, so that all the air pushed out of the nose. /m/ and /n/ All languages have consonants which are similar to / m/ and /n/ in English. Notice: 1- the soft palate is lowered for both /m/ and /n/. 2- for /m/ the mouth is blocked by closing the two lips, for /n/ by pressing the tip of the tongue against the alveolar ridge, and the sides of the tongue against the sides of the palate. 3- Both sounds are voice in English, as they are in other languages, and the voiced air passes out through the nose.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Consonant Substitution in Child Language (Ikwere) Roseline I
    Chapter 9 Consonant substitution in child language (Ikwere) Roseline I. C. Alerechi University of Port Harcourt The Ikwere language is spoken in four out of the twenty-three Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Rivers State of Nigeria, namely, Port Harcourt, Obio/Akpor, Emohua and Ikwerre LGAs. Like Kana, Kalabari and Ekpeye, it is one of the major languages of Rivers State of Nigeria used in broadcasting in the electronic media. The Ikwere language is classified asan Igboid language of the West Benue-Congo family of the Niger-Congo phylum of languages (Williamson 1988: 67, 71, Williamson & Blench 2000: 31). This paper treats consonant substi- tution in the speech of the Ikwere child. It demonstrates that children use of a language can contribute to the divergent nature of that language as they always strive for simplification of the target language. Using simple descriptive method of data analysis, the paper identifies the various substitutions of consonant sounds, which characterize the Ikwere children’s ut- terances. It stresses that the substitutions are regular and rule governed and hence implies the operation of some phonological processes. Some of the processes are strengthening and weakening of consonants, loss of suction of labial implosives causing them to become labial plosives, devoicing of voiced consonants, etc. While some of these processes are identical with the adult language, others are peculiar to children, demonstrating the relationships between the phonological processes in both forms of speech. It is worthy of note that high- lighting the relationships and differences will make for effective communication between children and adults. 1 Introduction The Ikwere language is spoken in four out of the twenty-three Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Rivers State of Nigeria, namely, Port Harcourt, Obio/Akpor, Emohua and Ik- werre LGAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Non-Pre-Vocalic Ejectives in Yakima Sahaptin Sharon Hargus Virginia Beavert University of Washington University of Oregon
    Characteristics of non-pre-vocalic ejectives in Yakima Sahaptin Sharon Hargus Virginia Beavert University of Washington University of Oregon NoWPhon, UO, Eugene, 5-13-16 1 Organization • Ejective background • Sahaptin • Word-final ejectives • Pre-consonantal ejectives • Conclusions and further research 2 Ejectives 3 Ejective types • Plosives [t’] • Affricates [ts’] • Fricatives [s’] 5 Some properties of pre-vocalic ejectives • f0 low or high at vowel onset • Silent period • Slow rise time 6 Lindau, Mona. 1984. Phonetic differences in glottalic consonants. Journal of Phonetics 12:147-155. Tlingit /χ/ vs. /χ’/ • /χaːt/ ‘spruce roots’ /χ’aːn’/ ‘fire’ Maddieson, Ian, Caroline L. Smith, and Nicola Bessell. 2001. 'Aspects of the Phonetics of Tlingit.' 7 Anthropological Linguistics 43:135-176. Ejective distribution • In most languages, ejectives only occur before vowels – Chipewyan, Witsuwit’en, etc. • In some languages, ejectives also occur before consonants and/or word-finally – Tlingit, Gitksan, Coast Tsimshian, Montana Salish, Ahtna, etc. – Ejectives in these environments less well described 8 Tlingit word-final ejective stops • “shorter and higher-amplitude noise than the pulmonic stops” glottal release h • /k’éːt/ ‘salmonberry bush; sprouts’ /k aːk’/ ‘forehead’ Maddieson, Ian, Caroline L. Smith, and Nicola Bessell. 2001. 'Aspects of the Phonetics of Tlingit.' 9 Anthropological Linguistics 43:135-176. Tlingit ejective fricatives • Pre-vocalic: Post-vocalic: • post-glottalized pre-glottalized [χ’aːn] ‘fire’ [khaːχ’] ‘chicken, grouse’ 10 Coast Tsimshian • Post-vocalic ejective stops and affricates are pre-glottalized: <’k, ’k, ’p, ’t, ’ts> – hanaa’k ‘woman’ – ~ hana’a Dunn, John Asher. 1979. Sm'algyax: A Reference Dictionary and Grammar for the Coast Tsimshian 11 Language.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Beatboxing : a Preliminary Study on Temporal Reduction
    Human Beatboxing : A preliminary study on temporal reduction. Alexis Dehais Underdown1, Paul Vignes1, Lise Crevier Buchman1,2 & Didier Demolin1 1 Laboratoire de Phonétique et Phonologie (Sorbonne Nouvelle / CNRS), 2 Hopital Foch, Univ. VSQ. [email protected] 1. Introduction Speech rate is known to be a factor of reduction affecting supralaryngeal gestures [4] [6] [1] and laryngeal gestures [5] depending on the prosodic structure [3]. An acoustic study [2] showed that beatboxing rate has articulatory effects on hi-hats in medial and final positions but that the overall production was not found to be affected. In the present study we are presenting an experiment based on a beatboxing speeding up paradigm. We used a single metric and rhythmical pattern to create various beatboxed patterns (BP). Human Beatboxing (HBB) seems to rely on different articulatory skills than speech because it does not obey to linguistic constraints. How do beatboxing rate affect sound duration ? We expect that (1) the faster the production, the shorter sound duration (2) affricates, trills and fricatives will shorten more than stops (3) position in the pattern influences sound reduction. 2. Methods A 32 y.o. professional beatboxer took part in the experiment. The recorded material was controlled in terms of sound pattern and rhythm. Indeed, to facilitate the comparison of beatboxing recordings we used only one metric pattern that we transposed into 12 Beatbox patterns (BP). Table 1 shows an example of two of the 12 BP created for the study. There is only one voiced sound (i.e. [ɓ]) in the corpus. Table 1 : Example of the structure of a Beatboxed Pattern Metric Rhythm Low High Long High Low Low High Long High Positions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BP1 [p’] [͡ts’] [↓k͡ L̥ ] [͡ts’] [p’] [p’] [͡ts’] [↓k͡ L̥ ] [͡ts’] BP2 [↓ʙ̥ ˡ] [͡ts’] [ʡhə̥ ] [͡ts’] [↓p] [↓ʙ̥ ˡ] [͡ts’] [ʡhə̥ ] [͡ts’] Concerning the rhythm, it was controlled using a vibrating metronome placed on his wrist.
    [Show full text]
  • Approximants: Consonant Sounds Produced by Making a Narrow Passage Between Two Organs of Speech; but with the Passage Being Wide
    Approximants: consonant sounds produced by making a narrow passage between two organs of speech; but with the passage being wider than that in fricatives so no friction is produced. There are two types of approximants: 1- Retroflex 2- Semi-vowels Retroflex: a consonant sound produced by having the tongue curved backwards near the roof of the mouth at the post alveolar area. At that point a narrow passage is made to produce the sound but with no friction. • There is only one retroflex consonant, /r/. • It has the velum raised, so no air goes out of the nasal cavity and all goes out of the mouth. • It is continuous. • It is voiced. /r/: consonant sound, approximant, retroflex, post-alveolar, voiced, lenis, weak, short; it does not occur in final position or before a consonant. e.g.: rule /ru:l/ , barrel /bærəl/ However, the retroflex /r/ is produced in certain contexts and not produced in others, depending on the following: 1- Produced before a vowel sound: • In initial position. e.g.: road /rəʊd/ • In medial position e.g.: borrow /bɒrəʊ/ 2- Not produced: • before a consonant sound: e.g.: cart /kα:t/ • in final position: e.g.: teacher/ti:tʃə/ Note: the combinations (er, ar, or) are produced as /ə/ whenever they occur. Semi-Vowels: consonant sounds produced by making a narrow passage between two organs of speech, but with no friction. • Both two semi-vowels /w, j/ are continuous. • Both are voiced. • Each has a different place of articulation. • So both are similar in manner of articulation and voicing, but differ in place of articulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Retroflexion and Retraction Revised∗
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main Retroflexion and Retraction Revised∗ Silke Hamann, OTS Utrecht Abstract Arguing against Bhat’s (1974) claim that retroflexion cannot be correlated with retraction, the present article illustrates that retroflexes are always retracted, though retraction is not claimed to be a sufficient criterion for retroflexion. The cooccurrence of retraction with retroflexion is shown to make two further implications; first, that non-velarized retroflexes do not exist, and second, that secondary palatalization of retroflexes is phonetically impossible. The process of palatalization is shown to trigger a change in the primary place of articulation to non-retroflex. Phonologically, retraction has to be represented by the feature specification [+back] for all retroflex segments. 1 Introduction Retroflex consonants are usually described as sounds articulated with a bent-backwards tongue tip and a postalveolar place of articulation, e.g. by Catford (1977: 150) or Trask (1996: 308). As illustrated in Hamann (in prep.), a number of retroflex segments deviate from this definition. The retroflex stops and nasals in Hindi, for example, do not show a bending backwards of the tongue tip but these sounds are still considered to be phonetically and phonologically retroflex. The same holds for the voiced and voiceless postalveolar fricatives in Polish and Russian (ibid.), which are articulated without active involvement of the tongue tip in the constriction (though the tip is raised from its resting position) and with a flat tongue body. The class of retroflexes shows considerable articulatory variation regarding both the articulator (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Guttural Weak Verbs
    Chapter Twenty-Five Third Guttural Weak Verbs Vocabulary [:l'B to swallow, be consumed [:g'P to meet, intercede h'm'B high place (f) x:t'P to open [:q'B to split open #Eq end H:b'G to be high, proud [:r'q to tare [:r'z to sow x:c'r to kill [:r'K to knell, bow down !'x.lUv table x:v'm to anoint v,m,v sun x:l's to forgive tAd.lAT generations (f) Weak Verb Designations III II I ← Modern designation Modern Description l :[ 'P ← Traditional 1 d :m '[ Pe Guttural I - Guttural Guttural in 1st root position 2 l :a 'v ‘Ayin Guttural II - Guttural Guttural in 2nd root position 3 x :l 'v Lamed Guttural III - Guttural Guttural in 3rd root position 4 l :k 'a Pe ‘Alef I – ‘Alef ‘Alef in 1st root position 5 a 'c 'm Lamed ‘Alef III- ‘Alef ‘Alef in 3rd root position 6 h 'n 'B Lamed He III - He He in 3rd root position 7 l :p 'n Pe Nun I - Nun Nun in 1st root position 8 b W v ‘Ayin Vav or Yod II – Vav or Yod II – Vav/Yod 9 b :v 'y Pe Vav or Yod I - Vav or Yod I – Vav/Yod 10 b :b 's Double ‘Ayin Geminate Third Guttural Weak Verbs A Third Guttural verb designated as Lamed Guttural or III-Guttural is one whose third or final root consonant is one of the limited gutturals: H, x, or [. Final a, h , or r do not act as gutturals when placed in the final root consonant.
    [Show full text]