DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Northwest Mainline Expansion April 2011 / 7212/7238 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC SETTING The state of the environment in the Project area has changed dramatically since settlers arrived in the northeastern BC and northwestern Alberta area in the early 1900s using the Athabasca, Edson and Hinton trails. Further information on these changes is provided in the cumulative effects assessment (Section 7.0 of this ESA). The following subsections present a summary of the environmental and socio-economic setting of the Project. The spatial boundaries of elements discussed in the environmental setting are described in Section 6.2 of this ESA. The environmental setting was compiled based on the following sources: • aquatic, vegetation, wetland, wildlife and heritage resources field studies conducted for the Project; • existing published literature including topographic maps, aerial photography, scientific papers, and reference books, as well as municipal, provincial and federal government maps, reports, interactive websites, guides, information letters, fact sheets and databases; and • personal communications with Aboriginal communities, local communities and land users, local and regional governments, federal and provincial government agencies and the general public. Methods of obtaining resource material included searching libraries, internet searches and receiving documents directly from government agencies. References used in the preparation of the environmental and socio-economic setting of this ESA are cited in Section 5.19 of this ESA. The supporting studies for this ESA are provided in Appendices 1 through 7 of this ESA. The environmental setting is divided into subsections according to either the environmental or social setting component. Potential Project-related effects and mitigation are presented in Section 6.2 of this ESA. Known reference points along the proposed pipeline loops are commonly referred to as KPs which are approximately 1 km apart and are primarily used to describe features along the proposed pipeline loops for construction, operation, and maintenance purposes. Refer to Section 1.1 of this ESA for a complete description of the KP designators set to distinguish the separate pipeline loops. For the Kyklo Creek Section, KPK 0.0 is located in BC near the existing Sierra Gas Plant in b-25-K/94-I-11 while the end (KPK 29.1) is located in a-97-F/94-I-10. For the Timberwolf Section, KPT 0.0 is located at the applied-for NGTL Moody Creek Compressor Station in NW 3-109-12 W6M and the end point(KPT 49.8) is located in NW 6-104-12 W6M at the existing NGTL Snowfall Creek Meter Station. For the Cranberry Section, KPC 0.0 is located at the NGTL Chinchaga Meter Station at NE 13-96-5 W6M and the end (KPC 32.3) is located at the existing NGTL Chinchaga Meter Station at SW 31-96-7 W6M. The spatial boundaries used in measuring each environmental or social component discussed in the setting considered one or more of the following areas. • A Footprint, made up of the area directly disturbed by the Project construction and clean-up activities, including associated physical works and activities (e.g., permanent rights-of-way, temporary construction camps, temporary workspaces for construction and block valve sites) • An LSA that varies with the environment and resource use related socio-economic element being considered. For each element considered, the LSA is established based on the zone of influence (ZOI) within which plants, animals and humans are most likely to be affected by Project construction and operation. Detailed discussions regarding the LSA and associated rationale are provided in Section 6.2 of this ESA. For social elements (e.g., human occupancy and resource use), local potential effects are related to specific communities considered in the socio-economic assessment. The communities considered were based on whether there would be direct potential effects, such as a physical, social or economic interaction between the Project and the community or community residents and their economic, social or cultural resources and pursuits. The communities considered in the socio-economic assessment include: – Horn River Mainline (Kyklo Creek Section): Northern Rockies Regional Municipality (NRRM); Page 5-1 NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Northwest Mainline Expansion April 2011 / 7212/7238 – Northwest Mainline (Timberwolf Section): Town of Rainbow Lake, Town of High Level and County of Northern Lights; and – Tanghe Creek Lateral Loop No. 2 (Cranberry Section): Town of Manning and Clear Hills County. • For Aboriginal communities, consideration was given to whether the Project was within 50 km of Aboriginal communities’ traditional territory as they defined it. The Aboriginal communities considered in the socio-economic assessment include: – Horn River Mainline (Kyklo Creek Section): Fort Nelson First Nation, Prophet River First Nation and Dene Tha’ First Nation; – Northwest Mainline (Timberwolf Section): Doig River First Nation, Dene Tha’ First Nation, Beaver First Nation, Fort Vermilion Métis Local 74, Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement; and Duncan’s First Nation; and – Tanghe Creek Lateral Loop No. 2 (Cranberry Section): Doig River First Nation, Dene Tha’ First Nation, Beaver First Nation, Fort Vermilion Métis Local 74, Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement and Duncan’s First Nation. An RSA consists of the area extending beyond the LSA boundary and varies with the environment and resource use related socio-economic element being considered. For each element considered, a separate spatial RSA boundary was established in consideration of the Project regional effects on the individual element. Further rationale for the establishment of the Project RSA(s) is provided in Section 6.2 of this ESA. The ecological boundary is described in the discussions of each applicable biological element. Spatial ecological boundaries were determined by the distribution, movement patterns and potential zones of interaction between an element and the Project. The ecological boundary may be limited to the Footprint (e.g., proposed pipeline construction right-of-way) or extend beyond the physical boundaries of the area of the Project component since the distribution or movement of an element can be local, regional or provincial in extent. Reconnaissance and detailed field studies, as well as desktop studies, considered a minimum corridor width of approximately 100 m wide corridor centred on the proposed pipeline loops, as well as known areas where temporary workspace is expected to be necessary. In the event an area of interest was identified (e.g., rare plant or wildlife feature such as a mineral lick), field crews expanded their survey as appropriate (no greater than the LSA) to identify the extent and distribution of the area of interest, and ensure a comprehensive assessment of the environmental characteristics of the proposed pipeline loop being considered. 5.1 Physical and Meteorological Environment This subsection presents a summary of the physical and meteorological environmental setting found in the Physical Environment RSA (see Figure 6.1). It describes the physiographic, geologic and meteorological conditions documented near the three proposed pipeline loops and associated facilities. Potential Project-related effects and mitigation pertaining to physical and meteorological environment are discussed in Section 6.2.1 of this ESA. 5.1.1 Physiography Horn River Mainline (Kyklo Creek Section) The Kyklo Creek Section lies in the Fort Nelson Lowland Subregion of the Great Plains Physiographic Region (Valentine et al. 1978). The Great Plains Physiographic Region is characterized by structurally controlled topography with mesas and cuestas, developed on flat-lying or gently dipping sandstones and shales. The sandstones are relatively resistant to erosion and are found in upland or level areas along this proposed pipeline loop. Terrain along the Kyklo Creek Section is generally level to undulating. Elevations along this proposed pipeline loop range from 384 to 434 m above sea level (asl). Page 5-2 NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Northwest Mainline Expansion April 2011 / 7212/7238 Northwest Mainline (Timberwolf Section) The Timberwolf Section traverses the Clear Hills Uplands Division of the Northern Alberta Uplands Physiographic Region (Pettapiece 1986). This proposed pipeline loop is located in the Rainbow Lake Plain and Chinchaga Plain Districts. Terrain is generally level to undulating along the Timberwolf Section with moderate slopes encountered at selected watercourse crossings (i.e., the Little Buffalo River and Chasm Creek). Steep slopes were noted at the watercourse crossing of Hay River at KPT 5.9. Elevations along this proposed pipeline loop range from 430 to 692 m asl. Tanghe Creek Lateral Loop No. 2 (Cranberry Section) The Cranberry Section is located in the Clear Hills Uplands Division of the Northern Alberta Uplands Physiographic Region (Pettapiece 1986). This proposed pipeline loop lies in the Clear Hills Plain and Chinchaga Plain Districts. Terrain is generally level to gently rolling along the Cranberry Section with some moderate slopes encountered along segments from approximately KPC 0.4 to KPC 0.9 and from KPC 20.0 to KPC 23.0. Elevations along this proposed pipeline loop range from 651 to 988 m asl. 5.1.2 Bedrock Geology Horn River Mainline (Kyklo Creek Section) The Kyklo Creek
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northwest Territories Territoires Du Nord-Ouest British Columbia
    122° 121° 120° 119° 118° 117° 116° 115° 114° 113° 112° 111° 110° 109° n a Northwest Territories i d i Cr r eighton L. T e 126 erritoires du Nord-Oues Th t M urston L. h t n r a i u d o i Bea F tty L. r Hi l l s e on n 60° M 12 6 a r Bistcho Lake e i 12 h Thabach 4 d a Tsu Tue 196G t m a i 126 x r K'I Tue 196D i C Nare 196A e S )*+,-35 125 Charles M s Andre 123 e w Lake 225 e k Jack h Li Deze 196C f k is a Lake h Point 214 t 125 L a f r i L d e s v F Thebathi 196 n i 1 e B 24 l istcho R a l r 2 y e a a Tthe Jere Gh L Lake 2 2 aili 196B h 13 H . 124 1 C Tsu K'Adhe L s t Snake L. t Tue 196F o St.Agnes L. P 1 121 2 Tultue Lake Hokedhe Tue 196E 3 Conibear L. Collin Cornwall L 0 ll Lake 223 2 Lake 224 a 122 1 w n r o C 119 Robertson L. Colin Lake 121 59° 120 30th Mountains r Bas Caribou e e L 118 v ine i 120 R e v Burstall L. a 119 l Mer S 117 ryweather L. 119 Wood A 118 Buffalo Na Wylie L. m tional b e 116 Up P 118 r per Hay R ark of R iver 212 Canada iv e r Meander 117 5 River Amber Rive 1 Peace r 211 1 Point 222 117 M Wentzel L.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Alberta Magazine Winter 2007
    VOLUME 36 | NUMBER 4 | WINTER 2007 Nature Alberta A L B E R T A ’ S N A T U R A L H I S T O R Y R E V I E W DINOSAUR PROVINCIAL PARK IAN GARDINER PHOTOGRAPHED IN JANUARY 2001 USING A NIKON F3HP CAMERA, A NIKON SERIES E 25-150 MM ZOOM LENS AND KODACHROME 64 SLIDE FILM feature article Northern Native Grasslands At Risk FEDERATION OF ALBERTA NATURALISTS The Alberta Parks and Protected Areas and Alberta Conservation Association Robert Bateman Commemorative Prints Supporting environmental education and stewardship in celebration of the 75th Anniversary of Alberta’s Provincial Parks. ollect the stunning set of four signed, special-edition Cprints featuring wildlife in specially selected Alberta provincial parks, to be released February 1st, at Canadian Tire stores across Alberta! The prints feature: Birgit Freybe Bateman • A Grizzly Bear in Rock Lake – Solomon Creek Wildland Park • A Woodland Caribou in Chinchaga Wildland Park • A Prairie Falcon in Writing-On-Stone Provincial Park celebration of the 75th Anniversary of Alberta’s • A Trumpeter Swan in Saskatoon Island Provincial Park Provincial Parks. The Alberta Conservation Association’s involvement Proceeds will help fund conservation education in this initiative exemplifies how financial assistance programming and the national Robert Bateman and support can enhance conservation education while “Gettoknow” program. promoting important information about our programs and “I dreamt about exploring Alberta’s diversity long before the value of wildlife, fish and habitat conservation work in I first had the chance to visit natural Alberta in the 1950s. our province. It is giving me great pleasure to investigate some of the “Ultimately, conservation is about people.
    [Show full text]
  • Murray Ingstrup
    Issue #6 Spring 2002 BIO: Murray Ingstrup Finally, in 1997 he arrived at the Cooking Lake-Blackfoot PRA where New Kid on the Committee one of his first projects was to help with the volunteers who had gathered to clear trails after a heavy spring snowstorm. But there is more to Murray than protected areas and volunteers. He and his wife Ingrid just spent 13 months travelling through dozens of countries on their bicycles. They returned in August 2001 from a 16,000km trip, covering Western Canada, Western USA, Mexico, Central America, and Western Europe. I’ll bet he has a few stories from that trip, eh! Over the years, Murray has proven his ability to maintain a positive attitude toward protected areas and Meet Murray Ingstrup, your Appointed in September 2001, he the volunteers who are so important. Volunteer Coordinating Committee may be new to the committee, but he At the Cooking Lake-Blackfoot Co-Chair. Murray is a conservation is no stranger to volunteerism in PRA, he continues to be involved officer at the Cooking Lake- protected areas. Throughout his with about 650 volunteers who come Blackfoot Grazing Wildlife and career, he has had extensive out for the Canadian Birkebeiner Ski Provincial Recreation Area (known involvement with volunteer Festival every February. As well, he in its short form as Cooking Lake- campground hosts and partnership or works with the Friends of Blackfoot Blackfoot PRA), located 45 km east cooperative groups. Cooperating Association year round. of Edmonton. Murray began working for the In 2000-2001 he helped the provincial government with the cooperating association create a In this Issue ..
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Lands Advocate ....13 Am I Still a Member? ....13 Resource Centre
    ild ands dvocate W L A AWA The Alberta Wilderness Association Journal February 2001 • Vol. 9, No. 1 http://AlbertaWilderness.ca [email protected] CONTENTS Development Proposal Compromises Crown of the Continent ............................1 Editorial ..............................2 Presentation to Cardston County Council ..................3 Alberta Wilderness Watch..6 Image provided by Cheryl Bradley Provincial Election............6 The Way It Is Gateway to Waterton Lakes National Park Bighorn Country ..............6 Evan Thomas ..................7 Little Smokey....................7 Development Proposal Compromises Crown of the Continent Cardinal Divide ................7 A proposed housing project next to Waterton Lakes National Park threatens the integrity of the Chinchaga ........................8 park and betrays commitments made by the landowner four years ago. Cardston County Council Castle Wilderness............8 is reviewing an application by Jim Garner, a Cardston County landowner, to subdivide two 50-acre Special Places Program ..8 parcels on the eastern edge of the world-famous park into about 25 lots for country residential development. In November 1997, Garner was granted permission to subdivide three 5-acre parcels National Parks..................8 from 380 acres and assured the Council that there would be no further subdivision. Wildlife advo- Prairie Conservation cates say the latest development proposal not only threatens water quality and wildlife but also will Forum ..............................8 become an eyesore on one of the most magnificent landscapes in Alberta. Third and final reading Grizzly Bear Hunting for the proposal will take place on March 12. If this subdivision is approved, it is feared that more Moratorium in B.C. ..........9 will follow. A more appropriate location for new homes would be Mountain View, a small town 20 km east of the park gate.
    [Show full text]
  • Biophysical Inventory of Chinchaga Wildland Park
    BIOPHYSICAL INVENTORY OF CHINCHAGA WILDLAND PARK Prepared By: Dennis O’Leary Amit Saxena Craig DeCoursey Geowest Environmental Consultants Ltd. Edmonton, AB Submitted to: Alberta Community Development Parks and Protected Areas Valleyview, AB March 15, 2002 Biophysical Survey of Chinchaga Wildland Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Chinchaga Wildland Park is one of Alberta’s newest additions to the protected areas network. The greater Chinchaga area was identified in 1995 as an Environmentally Significant Area in the Foothills Natural Region of Alberta. A portion of the area was subsequently designated as a Wildland Park in December 1999. With its current boundaries, Chinchaga Wildland Park encompasses approximately 800 km2 (80,000 hectares) of wilderness in a disjunct outlier of the Foothills Natural Region in northwest Alberta. The Chinchaga River itself forms the Park’s northern boundary, extending south to the slopes of Halverson Ridge. Elevations in the Park range from 650 m adjacent to the Chinchaga River to 915 m at the height of land atop Halverson Ridge. Located approximately 100 km west of Manning, Chinchaga Wildland Park is extremely isolated and remote. There is no formal road access into or within the Park, however considerable oil and gas exploration activity in the past has resulted in a network of seismic lines that can, and are, traversed by 4x4 vehicles. The Park is predominantly in the Lower Foothills Natural Subregion, but also includes portions of the Upper Foothills Natural Subregion (in the extreme southeast, at the slopes of Halverson Ridge). Vegetation in most of the Park is a combination of typical foothills vegetation and vegetation influenced by surrounding boreal forest environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Boreal Woodland Caribou Population Recovery in Northwest Alberta
    NORTHWEST SPECIES AT RISK COMMITTEE Recommendations for Boreal Woodland Caribou Population Recovery in Northwest Alberta REPORT DRAFT 2: July, 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Northwest Species at Risk Committee would like to thank the following individuals for their continued patience, knowledge, advice, expertise, support and contribution to the contents of this document: With Associated Environmental Consultants Inc.: Julie Lefebvre, MEDes, P. Biol.; Judy Smith, M.Sc., P. Biol.; April Strekies, B.Sc. BIT; Sarina Loots, M.Sc., P.Biol.; Sean Nicoll, P.Eng.; and Richard Simpson, M.Sc., RPF. With Paragon Wildlife Research and Analysis Ltd.: James (Jim) Rettie, Ph.D. With RSG Consultants: Riley and Samantha Georgsen; and With Northumbria University: Professor Alister Scott, BA. Ph.D. MRTPI. We would also like to thank Diana McQueen, with DMC Consulting, for providing technical assistance throughout the development and review of this document. Additionally, we would like to thank Byron Peters CET. and Hayley Gavin B.Sc. (Hons) for authoring this document and also, Dan Fletcher for undertaking the potential socio- economic impact assessment on behalf of the Northwest Species at Risk Committee. Finally, we extend our gratitude to all local stakeholders who invested their time to; attend multiple meetings, listen to and review information, provided valuable insight and input, and who have supported us on this journey. Northwest Species at Risk Committee, Alberta, Canada Recommendations for Boreal Woodland Caribou Population Recovery in Northwest Alberta First Draft Submitted to Alberta Environment and Parks: June, 2017 Cover Page Photo Credit: Ponton River, Caribou Mountains (May 18, 2017) – H. Gavin ii Northwest Species at Risk Committee (NWSAR) Recommendations for Boreal Woodland Caribou Population Recovery in Northwest Alberta Draft 2: July, 2017 INTRODUCTION The Northwest Species at Risk Committee (hereon-in referred to as “the NWSAR” or “the Committee”) is a grassroots organization initiated by six municipal governments in Northwest Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Parks and Protected Areas
    126 Andrew Lake 126 Future PRA (HRS) 126 Slave River Rapids Future PRA (HRS) 125 125 125 124 124 124 123 123 123 122 Colin-Cornwall 122 Lakes Wildland 122 121 121 121 120 La Butte Creek 120 Wildland 120 119 119 Kazan 119 Future Wildland 118 (HRS) Hot Pot NA (PNT) Fidler-Greywillow 118 Wildland Caribou Mountains Wildland 118 117 117 117 116 Egg Island 116 Ecological 116 Reserve 115 115 Wood Buffalo 115 National Park 114 114 (Alberta Portion) Fidler-Greywillow 114 Wildland 113 Hay-Zama Lakes 113 Wildland 113 112 112 Watt Mountain NA (PNT) 112 111 111 111 110 110 Ponton River 110 109 NA (PNT) 109 Ponton River Caribou River NA (PNT) South NA (PNT) Caribou River NA 109 108 Boyer NA (PNT) Child Lake Meadows NA Fort Vermilion PRA 108 Richardson 107 Rainbow Lake PRA 108 Future Wildland (HRS) Maybelle River 107 Machesis Lake PRA Wildland 107 106 106 R ic 105 Harper Creek NA 106 D h u a Athabasca Dunes n rd e s s o Ecological Res. 105 W n il R 105 d iv 104 la e n r d 104 104 103 103 Buffalo Tower PRA 103 102 102 101 102 Marguerite River 101 Peace River Wildland 13 12 101 5 100 11 10 9 4 3 2 8 7 7 6 6 5 4 3 10 9 8 2 100 25 24 14 13 12 11 23 22 21 20 19 19 18 17 16 15 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 100 25 24 23 22 21 20 99 99 99 98 Burning Sulphur NA (PNT) 98 Birch Mountains 98 Birch Mountains Wildland Future Expansion 97 Twin Lakes PRA (HRS) 97 Fort McMurray 97 96 96 96 95 Notikewin 95 Prov.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Planning in Northweast Alberta
    Conservation Planning in Northwest Alberta Northern Alberta Conservation Area Working Group June 13, 2016 Conservation Planning in Northwest Alberta The Northern Alberta Conservation Area Working Group Azeria, Ermias (Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute) Campbell, Carolyn (Alberta Wilderness Association) Carbyn, Lu (Nature Alberta) Dupont, Jaimee (Nature Conservancy of Canada) Dyer, Simon (Pembina Institute) Leston, Lionel (University of Alberta) McBlane, Lindsay (Ducks Unlimited Canada) Morissette, Julienne (Ducks Unlimited Canada) Nielsen, Scott (University of Alberta) Notzl, Lindsay (Nature Conservancy of Canada) Pendlebury, Danielle (Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society) Richard, Al (Ducks Unlimited Canada) Schieck, Jim (Alberta Innovates) Schneider, Richard (University of Alberta) Stolar, Jessica (University of Alberta) Stralberg, Diana (University of Alberta) Sullivan, Mike (Alberta Environment and Parks) Van Rensen, Cassidy (Alberta Environment and Parks) Lead Report Authors Richard R. Schneider Danielle Pendlebury June 13, 2016 Contact: Richard Schneider [email protected] http://www.ace-lab.org/index.php?page=asca&atlas=12 i Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 7 Methods ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared For: Prepared By
    NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Northwest Mainline Expansion April 2011 / 7212 APPENDIX 5 WILDLIFE HABITAT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED NOVA GAS TRANSMISSION LTD. NORTHWEST MAINLINE EXPANSION Page A5-1 WILDLIFE HABITAT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED NOVA GAS TRANSMISSION LTD. NORTHWEST MAINLINE EXPANSION April 2011 7212 Prepared for: Prepared by: NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. TERA Environmental Consultants A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of TransCanada PipeLines Limited Suite 1100, 815 - 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P2 Calgary, Alberta Ph: 403-265-2885 NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Wildlife Habitat Assessment - April 2011 Northwest Mainline Expansion 7212 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Traditional Ecological Knowledge ....................................................................................... 2 1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Study Area Boundaries ....................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Literature / Desktop Review ................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Species with
    [Show full text]
  • South Chinchaga Tie-In Installation
    PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA INC. SOUTH CHINCHAGA TIE-IN INSTALLATION NEB APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN (EIA) FOR THE PROPOSED SOUTH CHINCHAGA TIE-IN INSTALLATION Prepared for: Pioneer Natural Resources Canada Inc. 2900, 255 – 5th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta T2P 3G6 Prepared by: Ernst Environmental Services Box 753 Rosebud, Alberta T0J 2T0 Phone: (403) 677-2074 Fax: (4030 677-2229 PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA INC. SOUTH CHINCHAGA TIE-IN INSTALLATION NEB APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN (EIA) FOR THE PROPOSED SOUTH CHINCHAGA TIE-IN INSTALLATION (Refer to Individual Sections for Detailed Table of Contents, where applicable) PAGE LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY and PROJECT DEFINITIONS SECTION - 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY 3 SECTION - 2 LAND RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS AND ACQUISITION 8 SECTION - 3 PRESENT ZONING 9 SECTION - 4 EARLY PUBLIC NOTIFICATION 10 SECTION – 5 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 14 SECTION - 6 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 39 SECTION - 7 ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION AND MONITORING 50 SECTION - 8 POST CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES 51 SECTION – 9 SOCIO-ECONOMIC EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 55 SECTION - 10 CONCLUSIONS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO- ECONOMIC EFFECTS ASSESSMENTS 62 SECTION - 11 LITERATURE, PROJECT APPLICATIONS, REPORTS CITED AND USED 63 PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS 75 Pioneer Natural Resources Canada Inc. National Energy Board (NEB) Application Page 1 South Chinchaga Tie-In Installation Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES Appendix 1 - Letter of Non-Objection from Mr. Lee Morin Appendix 2 - Early Public Notification Letter and Schematic - Newspaper advertisement - Distribution List of Early Public Notification Letter - Early Public Notification Follow-Up Table - Section 87 (1) Notification Distribution List - Section 87 Notice Appendix 3 - Project Area Photos Appendix 4 - Post Construction Environmental Report to the National Energy Board, 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • K'ih Tsaa?Dze Tribal Park
    C-4 From: Laureen Whyte [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 6:28 PM To: Kelsey Bates <[email protected]> Cc: Shawn Dahlen <[email protected]>; Chair Brad Sperling <[email protected]>; Director Karen Goodings <[email protected]> Subject: K’ih Tsaa?dze Tribal Park Hello Ms. Bates and Mr. Dahlen, I am working with Doig River First Nation on a proposal for funding to conduct work to develop K’ih Tsaa?dze Tribal Park. We sent letters to your office, and also separately to Chair Brad Sperling and Director Karen Goodings. I also spoke with each of them about the details of the proposal. Doig River is seeking to engage area communities and ideally obtain letters of support for the proposal. Chair Sperling suggests I make the request through the PRRD. I’ve attached another copy of the letter that was sent earlier in March, along with background information. Can we discuss? Thank you, Laureen Laureen Tel: (778) 229-4791 March 28, 2019 C-4 From: Laureen Whyte [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 8:29 AM To: Chair Brad Sperling; Director Karen Goodings Cc: Cec Heron ([email protected]) Subject: K’ih Tsaa?dze Tribal Park Hello Directors Sperling and Goodings, Thank you for making the time to speak with me about Doig River First Nation’s proposal to the federal Nature Fund for conducting the cultural, scientific, government/First Nation/stakeholder engagement, and economic studies to work toward establishing K’ih Tsaa?dze Tribal Park.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alberta GPI Accounts: Parks and Wilderness
    The Alberta GPI Accounts: Parks and Wilderness Report # 21 by Mary Griffiths Sara Wilson Mark Anielski September 2001 The Alberta GPI Accounts: Parks and Wilderness About the Pembina Institute The Pembina Institute is an independent, citizen-based organization involved in environmental education, research, public policy development and corporate environmental management services. Its mandate is to research, develop, and promote policies and programs that lead to environmental protection, resource conservation, and environmentally sound and sustainable resource management. Incorporated in 1985, the Institute’s main office is in Drayton Valley, Alberta with additional offices in Calgary and Ottawa, and research associates in Edmonton, Toronto, Saskatoon, Vancouver and other locations across Canada. The Institute’s mission is to implement holistic and practical solutions for a sustainable world. The Green Economics Program is dedicated to designing and implementing practical, street-smart economic tools that would reorient society back to the original meaning of the word “economy”—the care and management of the wealth of the household. By developing new tools for measuring the true wealth or well-being of nations, we can help guide Canadians and Albertans to a sustainable future. For more information on the Pembina Institute’s work, please visit our website at www.pembina.org, or contact: The Pembina Institute Box 7558 Drayton Valley, AB T7A 1S7 tel: 780-542-6272 fax: 780-542-6464 e-mail: [email protected] About this Report This is one of 28 reports that provide the background for the Genuine Progress Indicators (GPI) System of Sustainable Well-being Accounts. It explains how we derived the index that was earlier published in “Sustainability Trends 2000: The Genuine Progress Statement for Alberta, 1961 to 1999.” The research for this report was completed near the end of 2000.
    [Show full text]