DOCSLIB.ORG

California Bypass Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Bypass Study California Department of Transportation Transportation Economics California Bypass Study The Economic Impacts of Bypasses Volume 1: Planning Reference FINAL REPORT System Metrics Group, Inc. In association with Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Economic Development Research Group, Inc. HLB Decision Economics, Inc. Judd Associates May 2006 California Bypass Study Table of Contents INTRODUCTION THEORETICAL RESEARCH CALIFORNIA CASE STUDIES HIGHWAY BYPASS IMPACT (HBI) MODEL REFERENCES Final Report Volume 1 - i - System Metrics Group California Bypass Study INTRODUCTION By rerouting traffic around the main streets of small towns, highway bypasses can provide a number of direct transportation benefits, such as diverting unwanted traffic, increasing roadway safety, reducing travel delays, and improving local access for people and goods. While these traffic impacts are well-understood, bypasses also have the potential to impact local economies. Area business owners may fear potential reductions in sales, while civic leaders may look forward to redeveloping downtown or promoting development along the new bypass. California is planning a number of bypasses over the next few years, particularly as the State Highway System matures and bypasses help to relieve congestion in local communities. Understanding the potential economic impacts is particularly important since local stakeholders often raise economic considerations to support or oppose proposed bypasses. Although the California Division of Highways conducted small studies in the 1950s, there have not been many studies of the economic impacts of California bypasses in recent years. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) sponsored the California Bypass Study to improve basic knowledge about the impacts of bypasses on small-town economies. The study included an investigation into the economic impacts of recent bypasses nationally and in California. This research is intended to foster better planning and construction of highway bypass projects by allowing the State to: • Develop a better understanding of the economic, fiscal and other closely related social and environmental impacts on communities affected by highway bypasses • Identify factors that can adversely affect the economic health of communities and the development of a standard methodology for the analysis of the economic impacts of bypass projects • Promote better project planning, design and implementation of bypass projects on a statewide basis to minimize adverse economic impacts and to maximize beneficial outcomes of such projects • Consider fully “community livability,” “context sensitive solutions” and “environmental justice” issues in project planning and implementation as they relate to proposed bypass projects. Although bypasses are planned for California communities of all sizes, the study focused on small towns, where bypasses are more likely to affect the local economy. In these settings, disruptions to a few local businesses can result in large impacts. Smaller Final Report Volume 1 - 1 - System Metrics Group California Bypass Study communities also tend to have fewer alternative highway routes, making the addition of bypasses more significant. As part of the California Bypass Study, the project team investigated previously constructed highway bypasses, both in California and other states, on a before-and-after (with-and-without) basis. Information about other states comes primarily from literature reviews, while direct field visits and published data provide substantial information about the California experience. The project team produced a database of four previously constructed and ten planned bypasses in California small towns. From a review of theoretical research and field research in California, the team developed best practices and lessons learned to help Caltrans planners and engineers plan for future bypasses. The project team also developed a spreadsheet tool that helps forecast potential economic impacts for planned bypasses. The Highway Bypass Impact (HBI) Model provides a range of possible impacts for use in discussions with the local community. The project included extensive field work and site visits to ensure that the results reflect the views of local stakeholders and is context sensitive. Summary Findings This report describes what the project team learned about the economic impacts of bypasses and is intended to serve as a reference handbook for Caltrans planners and engineers. In general, bypasses impact the local economy as a function of the type of traffic addressed. Businesses in communities with heavy local traffic or with through traffic that does not stop will not be impacted. Communities that provide services to pass-through traffic are more likely to be impacted. Caltrans planners and engineers, local business leaders, and local governments should consider several issues in planning and designing bypasses: What types of towns are impacted economically? • Highway-oriented towns have a much harder time transitioning their economies after bypasses are constructed than those that cater to local residents or offer tourist attractions. • Towns that serve as residential communities or as tourist destinations can benefit from reduced traffic and improved safety as a result of highway bypasses. Local government and the business community may need to engage in complementary efforts, such as marketing, downtown redevelopment, additional parking, and sidewalk improvements, to take advantage. Final Report Volume 1 - 2 - System Metrics Group California Bypass Study • Towns that serve regional markets by providing services, such as big box retail, automobile dealers, department stores, or hospitals, may experience little or no economic impacts. If a bypass provides better access to regional services, the local economy may actually improve as the town expands its regional draw. • Towns with other economic bases, such as government employment, mining, agriculture, manufacture, etc. are not likely to be economically impacted by bypasses. Which businesses are impacted? • Gas stations and quick service or fast food restaurants cater the most to pass-through traffic. They are most likely to be impacted by the diversion of traffic due to bypasses. • Other visitor-serving businesses, such as motels, art galleries, antique stores, and curio shops, cater more to visitors attracted to the community as a destination rather than those simply passing through. These businesses are less likely to be negatively impacted by bypasses and may find that business improves if the downtown is turned into a destination. • Regionally serving businesses, such as big box retail and departments stores, may benefit from improved access. • Businesses that serve local residents, such as drug stores, banks, and grocery stores are generally not impacted by bypasses. What other impacts occur? • Bypasses often have a short-term (and negative) impact on the local economy, but retail sales often improve in the longer term. However, some communities may never fully recover. • The construction of a bypass may also provide an opportunity for revitalization of the local community. • Bypasses are often promoted as improving pedestrian safety along Main Street. Since traffic accidents involving pedestrians are relatively rare events, Caltrans collision statistics may not reflect improved safety. However, bypasses may improve the perception of safety, which is a benefit in its own right. Final Report Volume 1 - 3 - System Metrics Group California Bypass Study What design features are most important? • Visibility. Negative economic impacts (losses of customers and sales) are likely to be small for businesses that remain visible from bypasses. In some cases, the goal of making downtowns visible from bypasses may conflict with the desire to protect communities from noise and visual impacts. Caltrans can provide some “visibility” for businesses through signage. • Distance from downtown. Bypasses located close to existing downtowns are less likely to hurt local economies. Travelers may be able to see businesses and access times are shorter. • Direct access. Highway interchanges can provide direct access from bypasses to downtowns and existing businesses. However, interchanges can also encourage the development of competition to existing businesses by offering new “prime” locations. • Time savings. The difference in travel time between the old route and the new bypass determines how many vehicles (and potential customers) divert to the bypass. What can Caltrans do? • In the field research, local communities offered several suggestions on how Caltrans can provide signs that may mitigate negative economic impacts. For example: – Caltrans could provide signs indicating services are available at the next exit. Some businesses have offered to pay for signs, but Caltrans districts have raised a concern whether the Department can be involved in “advertising” for specific businesses. – Caltrans could designate the existing route as a “scenic or historic” route to encourage tourist traffic. However, this must fit within the Department’s guidelines for such designation. – A bypass could be designated as a bypass route, while the original route retains the State Route designation. This may conflict with the State’s policy to avoid parallel routes. • The large lag between initial planning and engineering and construction may discourage businesses and residents from believing that a bypass Final Report Volume 1 - 4 - System Metrics Group California
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Old Hume Highway History Begins with a Road
    The Old Hume Highway History begins with a road Routes, towns and turnoffs on the Old Hume Highway RMS8104_HumeHighwayGuide_SecondEdition_2018_v3.indd 1 26/6/18 8:24 am Foreword It is part of the modern dynamic that, with They were propelled not by engineers and staggering frequency, that which was forged by bulldozers, but by a combination of the the pioneers long ago, now bears little or no needs of different communities, and the paths resemblance to what it has evolved into ... of least resistance. A case in point is the rough route established Some of these towns, like Liverpool, were by Hamilton Hume and Captain William Hovell, established in the very early colonial period, the first white explorers to travel overland from part of the initial push by the white settlers Sydney to the Victorian coast in 1824. They could into Aboriginal land. In 1830, Surveyor-General not even have conceived how that route would Major Thomas Mitchell set the line of the Great look today. Likewise for the NSW and Victorian Southern Road which was intended to tie the governments which in 1928 named a straggling rapidly expanding pastoral frontier back to collection of roads and tracks, rather optimistically, central authority. Towns along the way had mixed the “Hume Highway”. And even people living fortunes – Goulburn flourished, Berrima did in towns along the way where trucks thundered well until the railway came, and who has ever through, up until just a couple of decades ago, heard of Murrimba? Mitchell’s road was built by could only dream that the Hume could be convicts, and remains of their presence are most something entirely different.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Interstate Highway System Chase Minor [email protected]
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Williams Honors College, Honors Research The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors Projects College Fall 2019 Improving the Interstate Highway System Chase Minor [email protected] Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects Part of the Geographic Information Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Minor, Chase, "Improving the Interstate Highway System" (2019). Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects. 897. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/897 This Honors Research Project is brought to you for free and open access by The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Improving Interstate Highway System 1 Improving the Interstate Highway System Honors Thesis Project Presented to The University of Akron Honors College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Geography: GIS Bachelors of Science Chase A. Minor Spring 2019 Improving Interstate Highway System 2 Abstract The Interstate Highway System is the primary transportation network of the United States. The Interstate Highway System has succeeded and failed in certain ways in connecting the United States. It is important that new interstate highways are added so that the United States will be better connected.
    [Show full text]
  • 6001 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    6001 bus time schedule & line map 6001 St Patricks College View In Website Mode The 6001 bus line St Patricks College has one route. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) St Patricks College: 7:22 AM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 6001 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 6001 bus arriving. Direction: St Patricks College 6001 bus Time Schedule 33 stops St Patricks College Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 7:22 AM Old Hume Hwy opp Kelloway Av 85 Old Hume Highway, Camden South Tuesday 7:22 AM Old Hume Hwy opp Camden South Public School Wednesday 7:22 AM 26 Old Hume Highway, Camden Thursday 7:22 AM Old Hume Hwy opp Macquarie Av Friday 7:22 AM 12 Old Hume Highway, Camden Saturday Not Operational Camden Hospital, Broughton St Old Hume Highway, Camden Murray St opp Centrelink 24 Murray Street, Camden 6001 bus Info Direction: St Patricks College Oxley St after Argyle St Stops: 33 Oxley Street, Camden Trip Duration: 46 min Line Summary: Old Hume Hwy opp Kelloway Av, Old Camden Public School, Mitchell St Hume Hwy opp Camden South Public School, Old 27 John Street, Camden Hume Hwy opp Macquarie Av, Camden Hospital, Broughton St, Murray St opp Centrelink, Oxley St St Paul's Catholic Primary School, John St after Argyle St, Camden Public School, Mitchell St, St 7 John Street, Camden Paul's Catholic Primary School, John St, John St before Argyle St, Argyle St opp View St, Camden John St before Argyle St Valley Way opp Curry Reserve, Camden Valley Way 44 John Street, Camden opp Harrington
    [Show full text]
  • Highway 71 Improvement Study I Executive Summary This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    HIGHWAY 71 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT STUDY BELLA VISTA BYPASS – MISSOURI STATE LINE BENTON COUNTY Executive Summary DRAFT December 2017 Highway 71 Corridor Improvement Study Bella Vista Bypass to Missouri State Line BENTON COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared by the Transportation Planning and Policy Division Arkansas Department of Transportation In cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration This report was funded in part by the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Department of Transportation. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NOTICE OF NONDISCRIMINATION The Arkansas Department of Transportation (Department) complies with all civil rights provisions of federal statutes and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. Therefore, the Department does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, age, national origin, religion (not applicable as a protected group under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Title VI Program), disability, Limited English Proficiency (LEP), or low-income status in the admission, access to and treatment in the Department’s programs and activities, as well as the Department’s hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the Department’s nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Joanna P. McFadden Section Head - EEO/DBE (ADA/504/Title VI Coordinator), P.O. Box 2261, Little Rock, AR 72203, (501) 569-2298, (Voice/TTY 711), or the following email address: [email protected] Free language assistance for the Limited English Proficient individuals is available upon request. This notice is available from the ADA/504/Title VI Coordinator in large print, on audiotape and in Braille.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Bypass Basics Brochure
    ity un m Bypass Basics om d C ze -Si ium Co Med nside and ring a Bypass in Your Small by•pass /ˈbīˌpas/ noun Prepared by CUTR for the a road passing around a town or its center to FDOT Systems Planning Office 2014 provide an alternative route for through traffic. www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/ - Google Dictionary Bypass Basics why build a bypass? Your community may be asked to consider a bypass to relieve traffic congestion and to improve travel time for those passing through – especially trucks. Desire for a bypass is increasing for state highways on Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) that run through small- and medium-sized communities. This is because “SIS” highways are designated to provide for the statewide movement of people and goods and, therefore, are critical to the economy. is a bypass needed? Questions to ask Major state highways are often the main street in small and medium-sized Why is FDOT proposing a communities. This means they serve local, as well as regional, travel. bypass in this community? Freight and through traffic in these communities contribute to traffic congestion and have other adverse impacts on quality of life. A highway bypass may be appropriate where heavy truck traffic causes continuing unacceptable impacts, such as noise, fumes, and vibration. It may also Statistics from recently be appropriate where a high percentage of trips are just passing through completed bypasses in Florida: the community. In these situations, the bypass would significantly reduce traffic congestion and pollution. • Bypasses circumvent communities with populations ranging from 10,000 to Roadways on Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) support economic 90,000–most with a population under 25,000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Hume Highway History Begins with a Road
    The Old Hume Highway History begins with a road Routes, towns and turnoffs on the Old Hume Highway RMS8104_HumeHighwayGuide_SecondEdition_2018_v3.indd 1 26/6/18 8:24 am Foreword It is part of the modern dynamic that, with They were propelled not by engineers and staggering frequency, that which was forged by bulldozers, but by a combination of the the pioneers long ago, now bears little or no needs of different communities, and the paths resemblance to what it has evolved into ... of least resistance. A case in point is the rough route established Some of these towns, like Liverpool, were by Hamilton Hume and Captain William Hovell, established in the very early colonial period, the first white explorers to travel overland from part of the initial push by the white settlers Sydney to the Victorian coast in 1824. They could into Aboriginal land. In 1830, Surveyor-General not even have conceived how that route would Major Thomas Mitchell set the line of the Great look today. Likewise for the NSW and Victorian Southern Road which was intended to tie the governments which in 1928 named a straggling rapidly expanding pastoral frontier back to collection of roads and tracks, rather optimistically, central authority. Towns along the way had mixed the “Hume Highway”. And even people living fortunes – Goulburn flourished, Berrima did in towns along the way where trucks thundered well until the railway came, and who has ever through, up until just a couple of decades ago, heard of Murrimba? Mitchell’s road was built by could only dream that the Hume could be convicts, and remains of their presence are most something entirely different.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of Highway Bypasses on Communities
    The Economic Impacts of Highway Bypasses on Communities Summary A research project by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation January 1998 (reformatted in April of 1999 for Internet placement) 1 NOTICE: This research was funded by the Wisconsin Council on Research of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The contents of this report reflect the research findings of the staff of WisDOT’s Economic Planning & Development Section, who are responsible for the accuracy of the data contained herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect official views or policies of WisDOT or FHWA at the time of publication. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of WisDOT and FHWA in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute policy standards, specifications or regulations. The United States Government does not endorse products or businesses. Trade, publication or product names may appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the research conducted in the study. 2 3 INTRODUCTION KEY PROJECT FINDINGS: Since 1980, there have been State Highway bypasses built around 17 Wisconsin communities. Through • In most communities, highway bypasses have the year 2010, at least 20 more bypasses are little adverse impact on overall economic anticipated for construction. activity. The economies of smaller communities have a greater potential to be adversely impacted by a bypass. Bypass plans often generate local concern about impacts on local commerce, development, land use, • Over the long term, average traffic levels on and general quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Viva Energy REIT Portfolio
    Property Portfolio as at 31 December 2018 ADDRESS SUBURB STATE/ CAP RATE CARRYING MAJOR TENANT TERRITORY VALUE LEASE EXPIRY Cnr Nettleford Street & Lathlain Drive Belconnen ACT 6.18% $10,180,000 2034 Cnr Cohen & Josephson Street Belconnen ACT 6.22% $3,494,183 2027 Cnr Mort Street & Girrahween Street Braddon ACT 5.75% $4,240,000 2028 Lhotsky Street Charnwood ACT 6.69% $7,070,000 2033 17 Strangways Street Curtin ACT 6.74% $3,933,191 2028 25 Hopetoun Circuit Deakin ACT 6.49% $4,657,265 2030 Cnr Ipswich & Wiluna Street Fyshwick ACT 6.51% $2,840,000 2027 20 Springvale Drive Hawker ACT 6.50% $5,360,000 2031 Cnr Canberra Avenue & Flinders Way Manuka ACT 6.18% $8,100,000 2033 172 Melrose Drive Phillip ACT 6.00% $5,010,000 2030 Rylah Crescent Wanniassa ACT 6.49% $3,120,000 2027 252 Princes Highway Albion Park NSW 6.28% $6,041,239 2031 Cnr David Street & Guinea Street Albury NSW 7.08% $5,273,140 2031 562 Botany Road Alexandria NSW 4.79% $12,178,139 2034 124-126 Johnston Street Annandale NSW 4.25% $4,496,752 2027 89-93 Marsh Street Armidale NSW 8.76% $3,386,315 2028 Cnr Avalon Parade & Barrenjoey Road Avalon NSW 4.51% $4,190,223 2027 884-888 Hume Highway (Cnr Strickland Street) Bass Hill NSW 4.99% $4,225,892 2028 198 Beach Road Batehaven NSW 7.08% $5,374,877 2031 298 Stewart Street (Cnr Rocket Street) Bathurst NSW 6.53% $6,010,223 2029 59 Durham Street Bathurst NSW 7.00% $6,810,000 2033 Cnr Windsor Road & Olive Street Baulkham Hills NSW 4.75% $10,020,000 2028 Cnr Pacifi c Highway & Maude Street Belmont NSW 6.19% $3,876,317 2030 797 Pacifi c Highway
    [Show full text]
  • Roadway &Traffic Operations Strategy
    ESTABLISHING MULTI-MODAL STRATEGIES | CHAPTER 4 ROADWAY & TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STRATEGY To serve planned growth, the future transportation system needs multi-modal improvements and strategies to manage the forecasted travel demand. This chapter presents a detailed strategy to improve Moscow’s roadway network and traffic operations over the next 20 years, including network connectivity options, regional circulation enhancements, intersection modifications, and multi-modal street design guidelines. MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN This page intentionally left blank. Moscow on the Move 4 ROADWAY & TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STRATEGY Supporting the guiding principles of Moscow on the Move, the Roadway & This Transportation Traffic Operations Strategy strives to provide a truly multi-modal Commission “check mark” icon signifies transportation system and improve safety, access, and mobility for all street which actions have unanimous users by identifying strategies, policies, and projects that help achieve support from the Commission. Moscow’s vision for mobility and access. This strategy of Moscow on the Move The icon is a way to illustrate the level of support for identifies opportunities to retrofit existing streets in Moscow and develops the implementation. street grid to improve citywide connectivity for motor vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users. This strategy specifically provides an overview of the existing traffic conditions and how conditions might change by 2035, a street network plan, various design tools that could be applied throughout the city, and descriptions of recommended street projects. FUTURE DEFICIENCIES AND NEEDS Existing and future roadway and traffic operation conditions were assessed to determine the needs and deficiencies of the system. The key areas projected to require improvement or to present future challenges are summarized below.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Highway Bypasses on Rural Communities and Small Urban
    NCHRP National Cooperative Highway Research Program RnsEnncH REsurrs DIcEST Number 210 Subjcct Arca: IA Planning and Adrninistration Responsible Senior Progranr Oflìcer: Scott A. .Sabol EFFECTS OF HIGHWAY BYPASSES ON RURAL COMMUNITIES AND SMALL URBAN AREAS c.. I This RRD is a staf digest of a study cottducted as part of NCHRP Project 20-5, " Synthesis of Information Related- to llighway Problerns," for which the Transportatiott Research Board is tlrc agency conducting tlrc research. The Principal Investigator responsible for this project is Sally D. I.iff, Manager, Synthesis Studies, serving under the Studies and lnþrmation Services Division of the Board. Dr. Jesse Bufington and Ms. Katie Womack, of the Texas Transporhrion Institute were responsible for data collection, initial analyses and report preparation. Dr. Andrew C. I-emer conducted additional analyses and prepared the final text. INTRODUCTION challenged decision makers. Transportation planners seek to improve transportation system efficiency by In the late fall of 1964, a new highway bypass constructing bypasses, while people in the towns to be around Cherokee,Iowa (1990 population 6,026) opened bypassed protest the diversion of traffic that some view to t¡affic. l¡cal business people had actively opposed as their sotuce of livelihootl. Such issues are particu- the construction, t'earing that traffic diverted from the larly acute in rural communities and small urban a¡eas, main route ttuough town would take sales with it. Just where highway orienæd development may account for a over two decades later, the former o\uìer of a clothing substantial proportion of the local economy. store in Cherokee echoetl the views of many others in the town when he concluded that he and others had over-reacted: the bypass did not hurt retail sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Bella Vista Bypass Safety Analysis Introduction a Safety Analysis
    Bella Vista Bypass Safety Analysis Introduction A safety analysis was conducted for the Highway 71 corridor between Highway 71B interchange south of the City of Bella Vista and Highway H south of Pineville (study area). The analysis considered crashes occurring in years 2006 and 2007, and examined crashes by severity, and crashes by type of impact. Additional crash data analysis for earlier years can be found in the Final Environmental Impact Statement completed in 2000. In 2006, there were 93 crashes in Arkansas, and 65 crashes in Missouri. In 2007, the Arkansas portion of the study area had 100 crashes, with 77 crashes in Missouri. This is an average number of crashes of 168 crashes per year within the entire corridor. Crash Rates Arkansas study area crash rates for the existing corridor were 1.27 crashes per million vehicle miles (MVM) in 2006, and 1.23 crashes per MVM in 2007. Comparatively, the statewide average crash rates were 2.37 and 2.50 for years 2006 and 2007, respectively, for similar facility types. Crash rates for the existing corridor in Missouri were 1.25 crashes per MVM and 1.49 crashes per MVM for 2006 and 2007, respectively. The statewide average crash rate in Missouri for similar type facilities was 1.53 crashes per MVM in 2007. Severity of Crashes Table S-1 displays the number and severity of crashes that have occurred along existing Highway 71 within the study area. Over the two-year study period, there were a total of 7 crashes that resulted in 7 fatalities, 134 crashes that resulted in 317 people injured, and 194 crashes that resulted in property damage only.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 66 in Illinois: (2012/13 Update and Expansion of the Original 1994/95 Survey)
    Route 66 in Illinois: (2012/13 Update and Expansion of the Original 1994/95 Survey) IDOT Sequence #17337 & #17337A Prepared for: • Illinois Department of Transportation • Parsons Brinckerhoff • Knight E/A, Inc. Prepared by: Heritage Research, Ltd. Historical & Environmental Consultants Menomonee Falls, WI 53051 22 December 2013 Sequence Map 1994/95 Historic 2012/13 Number Code Negative # Address/Location Type Date Built Function 1994/95 Comments Comments and Photo Image # Table of Contents: Introduction 004 Historical Summary 004 Route 66 Survey (1994/95 & 2012/13) & Miscellaneous Observations 008 City of Chicago to City of Plainfield 014 Adam Street: Michigan Avenue to Ogden Avenue (one way west) 014 Jackson Street: Michigan Avenue to Ogden Avenue (one way east) 027 Ogden Avenue: Jackson Street (City of Chicago) to Harlem Street (City of Lyons) 043 Ogden Avenue/Lawndale Avenue Alignment (City of Lyons, 1926-1928) 078 Harlem Avenue to Joliet Road (Various Municipalities) 082 City of Plainfield: Bypass Alignment (Post-1940) 095 City of Joliet & Vicinity 098 IH-55 (Exit) 268 to Des Plaines River Bridge (City of Joliet) 098 Ottawa Street: Des Plaines River to W. Allen Street (southbound realignment off Chicago Street) 122 Original Alignment: Chicago Street (southbound) and Scott Street (northbound) 126 Chicago Street: Two-way Traffic, Allen Street to Laraway Road 135 Business RT 66: Joliet (Laraway Road) to Gardner (via IL 53) 141 Laraway Road to Wilmington 141 Wilmington 154 Wilmington to Gardner 174 Bypass RT 66: Joliet to Gardner (via
    [Show full text]