DOCSLIB.ORG

Lumensm Wavelength Transatlantic Service Global | Scalable | Diverse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lumensm Wavelength Transatlantic Service Global | Scalable | Diverse LumenSM Wavelength Transatlantic Service Global | Scalable | Diverse CenturyLink Wavelength Network FARICE1 DANICE NORTHSTAR AKORN TAT14 AC1 NORTH AECONNECT GTT ATLANTIC NORTH PC1 APOLLO NORTH YELLOW TGNA AC2 PACIFIC CROSSING1 PC1 AC1 SOUTH TEA APOLLO SOUTH WACS FLAG NORTH FA1 EIG FLAG SOUTH FA1 PC1 JAPAN US HAWK SEAMEWE4 JAPAN US EUROPE INDIA GATEWAY EIG EAC JONAH RNAL UNITY TGNEA SEAMEWE5 RNAL UNITY Tijuana MAC MIDATLANTIC TPE JAPAN US Cuidad Juarez GLOBENET WACS CROSSING MAC® JAPAN US SCCN TPE RNAL SCCN Monterrey APCN2 C2C Map current as of Q4 2018 EAC Miami On-Net market FNAL Reynosa MAC APCN2 AAG Mazatlan SAM1 IMEWE C2C TEAMS RNAL Lumen Network SEAMEWE4 Querétaro EIG FLAG / FALCON TGNIA TGN PACIFIC Guadalajara Veracruz Santo Domingo SJC Kingston Leased Network EAC Mexico City St. Croix C2C PANAMERICAN CROSSING PAC APCN2 ASIAAMERICA GATEWAY AAG ARCOS San Juan TGNEA IMEWE SAC Guatemala City SEAMEWE4 TGNIA AMERICASII BBG Guacara Maracay SEAMEWE4 Carriers andSanta Martaenterprises alike require flexible, reliable core networks that can scale in a dynamic business environment. TEAMS SEAMEWE5 Barranquilla Maracaibo Caracas Port of Spain San Jose Cartagena SEAMEWE4 Esterillos Colon Puerto La Cruz I2I Lumen WavelengthPanama Valledupar TransatlanticValencia services provide the end-to-end solution to meet these needs. TIC AAG Balboa Cucuta Barquisimeto I2I TIC Medellin Puerto Ordaz Manizales Bucaramanga EASSY Pereira BBG Armenia Bogota SEAMEWE5 PPC1 AUSTRALIAJAPAN CABLE AJC Buenaventura Villavicencio SOUTHERN CROSS SCCN Popayán Cali Ibagué Pasto Neiva Esmeraldas Ibarra ENDEAVOR Quito Lago Agrio NewManta ApolloCoca South network capabilities Guayaquil Cayambe Cuenca IA Loja MIC1 Fortaleza • UpgradedPiura Submarine Line Terminating Equipment Chiclayo Trujillo Speeds and systems (SLTE) Recife SOUTH AMERICAN CROSSING SAC Chimbote AMERICASII WACS EASSY • Apollo SouthLima fiber pair owned and operated Salbyvador Lumen • 1G, 10G, 40G, 100G wavelengths Lurin from France Icato the U.S. Brasilia SAC Arequipa • Apollo South (route distance — ~6500 km) Mogi Mirim • Diversity options include multiple sub-sea andBelo Horizonte SEAMEWE3 Sorocaba Campinas terrestrial network options in EMEALondrina and the RioU.S. de Janeiro SAC Salta • AC1 South (route distance — 6,000 km) São Paulo • Advanced capacities and capabilities matchSantos services Tucumán Resistencia Curitiba available on Yellow andCorrientes AC-1 Cable Systems • Yellow (route distance — 6,200 km) P. Libres San Juan Cordoba Paraná Porto Alegre Uruguaiana • Scalable bandwidth up to 100 Gbps wavesSAC now Valparaíso Mendoza Rosario Rio Cuarto Pilar Santiago available on all threeSan Luis transatlanticBuenos Aires cable systems San Rafael La Plata Las Toninas Bahia Blanca Neuquén Mar del Plata Bariloche Comodoro Rivadavia Rio Gallegos Rio Grande FARICE1 DANICE NORTHSTAR AKORN FARICE1 TAT14 AC1 NORTH DANICE AECONNECT GTT ATLANTIC NORTH PC1 APOLLO NORTH Diverse cable systems and landing stations YELLOW TGNA AC2 PACIFIC CROSSING1 PC1 AC1 SOUTH TEA NORTHSTAR APOLLO SOUTH WACS FLAG NORTH FA1 EIG AKORN TAT14 FLAG SOUTH FA1 PC1 JAPAN US AC1 NORTH HAWK SEAMEWE4 AECONNECT GTT ATLANTIC NORTH JAPAN US EUROPE INDIA GATEWAY EIG JONAH EAC RNAL UNITY PC1 APOLLO NORTH TGNEA SEAMEWE5 Map current as of Q4 2018 RNAL UNITY Tijuana YELLOW TGNA AC2 PACIFIC CROSSING1 TPE Cuidad Juarez MAC MIDATLANTIC GLOBENET WACS PC1 JAPAN US • Apollo South: Lannion, France and Manasquan, U.S.® • AC1: White Sands, U.K., Sylt, Germany and SCCN AC1 SOUTH CROSSING MAC JAPAN US • FLAG North: Skewjack, U.K. and Northport, U.S. Brookhaven, U.S. TEA • Hibernia: Southport,APOLLO U.K. SOUTH and Lynn MA, U.S. • Apollo North: Bude, U.K. and Shirley, U.S. TPE • Yellow: Bude, U.K. and Bellport, U.S. WACS RNAL SCCN Monterrey APCN2 C2C FLAG NORTH FA1 EIG EAC Miami FNAL Reynosa MAC Mazatlan FLAG SOUTH FA1 PC1 APCN2 AAG Why Lumen SAM1 IMEWE C2C JAPAN US TEAMS RNAL Maximize Network Diversity HAWK SEAMEWE4 SEAMEWE4 Querétaro • Benefit from true end-to-end cable system diversity options available with AC1 South or Yellow, EIG TGNIA FLAG / FALCON TGN PACIFIC and Apollo South. JAPAN US Guadalajara Veracruz Santo Domingo EUROPE INDIA SJC • LeverageKingston Lumen on-net services for optimized network backhaul routing resiliency and security. GATEWAY EIG EAC PANAMERICAN CROSSING PAC Mexico City St. Croix EAC C2C UNITY JONAH RNAL APCN2 ASIAAMERICA GATEWAY AAG ARCOSComprehensive solutions Sanfrom Juan a single provider TGNEA TGNEA IMEWE • Our global network is the foundation of an extensive portfolio of transport, data, voice and video solutions SEAMEWE5 UNITY that can be tailored for your specific business needs by our networkSAC design professionals. RNAL Tijuana SEAMEWE4 MAC MIDATLANTIC Guatemala City TPE TGNIA JAPAN US Cuidad Juarez GLOBENET Maracay WACS AMERICASII BBG SEAMEWE4 CROSSING MAC® Reliable, flexibleSanta Marta and scalableGuacara network TEAMS JAPAN US SCCN SEAMEWE5 San• JoseOur globalBarranquilla coverage and capacityMaracaibo deliverCa theracas bandwidth,Port performanceof Spain and control your applications demandCartagena for connecting employees, customers and partners. SEAMEWE4 Esterillos Colon Puerto La Cruz I2I TPE Valledupar Valencia TIC RNAL AAG SCCN Monterrey Balboa Panama APCN2 C2C Cucuta Barquisimeto I2I Listed speeds varyMedellin due to conditions outside of network control, including customer EAC TIC Miami location, equipment, access through a wireless connection, and are not guaranteed. FNAL Reynosa MAC Manizales Puerto Ordaz Mazatlan Bucaramanga EASSY APCN2 BBG AAG SAM1 Pereira IMEWE C2C SEAMEWE5 Armenia Bogota TEAMS RNAL PPC1 Buenaventura Villavicencio SEAMEWE4 AUSTRALIAJAPAN CABLE AJC Querétaro Popayán EIG SOUTHERN CROSS SCCN Cali Ibagué FLAG / FALCON TGNIA TGN PACIFIC Guadalajara Veracruz Santo Domingo Pasto Neiva SJC Kingston Esmeraldas Ibarra EAC ENDEAVOR Mexico City St. Croix Quito Lago Agrio C2C PANAMERICAN CROSSING PAC APCN2 ASIAAMERICA GATEWAY AAG ARCOS San Juan Manta Coca Guayaquil Cayambe TGNEA IMEWE Cuenca IA SAC Loja Fortaleza MIC1 Guatemala City 877-453-8353 | lumen.com SEAMEWE4 TGNIA AMERICASII Piura BBG Guacara Maracay SEAMEWE4 Santa Marta Chiclayo TEAMS SEAMEWE5 Barranquilla Maracaibo Caracas Port of Spain Services not available everywhere. Business customers only. Lumen may change, cancel or substitute products and services, San Jose Cartagena or vary them by service Tarearujillo at its sole discretion without notice. ©2020 Lumen Technologies. All Rights Reserved. SEAMEWE4 Recife I2I Esterillos Colon Puerto La Cruz Chimbote AMERICASII WACS Panama Valledupar Valencia SOUTH AMERICAN CROSSING SAC TICEASSY AAG Balboa Cucuta Barquisimeto I2I Medellin TIC Puerto Ordaz Lima Salvador Manizales Bucaramanga EASSY Pereira Lurin BBG Armenia Bogota SEAMEWE5 PPC1 Ica Brasilia AUSTRALIAJAPAN CABLE AJC Buenaventura Villavicencio SOUTHERN CROSS SCCN Popayán Cali Ibagué SAC Pasto Neiva Arequipa Esmeraldas Ibarra ENDEAVOR Quito Lago Agrio Mogi Mirim Belo Horizonte Manta Coca SEAMEWE3 Guayaquil Cayambe Sorocaba Campinas Cuenca IA Loja Londrina Rio de Janeiro MIC1 Fortaleza SAC Piura Salta São Paulo Chiclayo Santos Trujillo Recife Tucumán Resistencia SOUTH AMERICAN CROSSING SAC Chimbote AMERICASII Curitiba WACS EASSY Corrientes Lima Salvador P. Libres San Juan Cordoba Paraná Porto Alegre Lurin Uruguaiana Ica Brasilia SAC Valparaíso Mendoza Rosario SAC Rio Cuarto Pilar Arequipa Santiago San Luis Buenos Aires Mogi Mirim San Rafael Belo Horizonte La Plata SEAMEWE3 Campinas Las Toninas Sorocaba Bahia Blanca Londrina Rio de Janeiro Neuquén Mar del Plata SAC Salta São Paulo Santos Bariloche Tucumán Resistencia Curitiba Corrientes P. Libres San Juan Cordoba Paraná Porto Alegre Uruguaiana Comodoro Rivadavia SAC Valparaíso Mendoza Rosario Rio Cuarto Pilar Santiago San Luis Buenos Aires San Rafael La Plata Las Toninas Bahia Blanca Neuquén Mar del Plata Rio Gallegos Bariloche Rio Grande Comodoro Rivadavia Rio Gallegos Rio Grande.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of EDGE CABLE HOLDINGS USA, LLC, File No. SCL-LIC-2020-____________ AQUA COMMS (AMERICAS) INC., AQUA COMMS (IRELAND) LIMITED, CABLE & WIRELESS AMERICAS SYSTEMS, INC., AND MICROSOFT INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, LLC, Application for a License to Land and Operate a Private Fiber-Optic Submarine Cable System Connecting the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, to Be Known as THE AMITIÉ CABLE SYSTEM JOINT APPLICATION FOR CABLE LANDING LICENSE— STREAMLINED PROCESSING REQUESTED Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 34, Executive Order No. 10,530, and 47 C.F.R. § 1.767, Edge Cable Holdings USA, LLC (“Edge USA”), Aqua Comms (Americas) Inc. (“Aqua Comms Americas”), Aqua Comms (Ireland) Limited (“Aqua Comms Ireland,” together with Aqua Comms Americas, “Aqua Comms”), Cable & Wireless Americas Systems, Inc. (“CWAS”), and Microsoft Infrastructure Group, LLC (“Microsoft Infrastructure”) (collectively, the “Applicants”) hereby apply for a license to land and operate within U.S. territory the Amitié system, a private fiber-optic submarine cable network connecting the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. The Applicants and their affiliates will operate the Amitié system on a non-common-carrier basis, either by providing bulk capacity to wholesale and enterprise customers on particularized terms and conditions pursuant to individualized negotiations or by using the Amitié cable system to serve their own internal business connectivity needs. The existence of robust competition on U.S.-U.K., U.S.-France, and (more broadly) U.S.-Western Europe routes obviates any need for common-carrier regulation of the system on public-interest grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Subsea Telecommunications & Its
    The Story of Subsea Telecommunications 02 & its Association with Enderby House By Stewart Ash INTRODUCTION The modern world of instant communications 1850 - 1950: the telegraph era began, not in the last couple of decades - but 1950 - 1986: the telephone era more than 160 years ago. Just over 150 years 1986 until today, and into the future: the optical era ago a Greenwich-based company was founded that became the dominant subsea cable system In the telegraph era, copper conductors could supplier of the telegraph era, and with its carry text only — usually short telegrams. During successors, helped to create the world we know the telephone era, technology had advanced today. enough for coaxial cables to carry up to 5,680 simultaneous telephone calls. And in today’s On 7 April 1864, the Telegraph Construction and optical era, fibres made of glass carry multi- Maintenance Company Ltd, better known for most wavelengths of laser light, providing terabits of of its life as Telcon, was incorporated and began its data for phone calls, text, internet pages, music, global communications revolution from a Thames- pictures and video. side site on the Greenwich Peninsula. Today, high capacity optic fibre subsea cables For more than 100 years, Telcon and its successors provide the arteries of the internet and are the were the world’s leading suppliers of subsea primary enablers of global electronic-commerce. telecommunications cable and, in 1950, dominated the global market, having manufactured and For over 160 years, the Greenwich peninsula has supplied 385,000 nautical miles (714,290km) of been at the heart of this technological revolution, cable, 82% of the total market.
    [Show full text]
  • March 30, 2015 by ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12Th Street, S.W. Washin
    (202) 223-7323 (202) 204-7371 [email protected] March 30, 2015 BY ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Joint Application for Transfer of Control of Cable Landing Licenses from Columbus Networks, Limited to Cable & Wireless Communications Plc, File Nos. SCL-T/C-20141121-00013 and SCL-T/C-20141121-00014; Applications for Transfer of Control of Section 214 Authorizations from Columbus Networks, Limited to Cable & Wireless Communications Plc, File Nos. ITC-T/C-20141121-00304 and ITC-T/C-20141121-00307 Dear Ms. Dortch: On Thursday, March 26, 2015, the undersigned counsel and representatives of Cable & Wireless Communications Plc (“C&W”) and Columbus Networks, Limited (“CNL”) met with members of the Commission’s staff to discuss the above-cited pending applications, and in particular Digicel’s pleadings and ex parte filing in the proceeding. Doc#: US1:9949275v3 Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary 2 Attending this meeting on behalf of Cable & Wireless Communications Plc were Belinda Bradbury, General Counsel, and Simeon Irvine, Chief Executive, Wholesale. C&W outside counsel Patrick Campbell and Diane Gaylor of Paul,Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP also attended. Attending on behalf of Columbus Networks, Limited were Paul Scott, President and Chief Operating Officer, Columbus Networks USA, Inc., and Victor A. Lago, Vice President of Legal Affairs, Columbus Networks USA, Inc. CNL outside counsel Ulises Pin of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP also attended. Commission staff in attendance were, from the International Bureau, Nese Guendelsberger, Deputy Bureau Chief (by phone); Kathleen Collins, Assistant Bureau Chief; Walt Strack, Assistant Bureau Chief and Chief Economist; Howard Griboff, Acting Division Chief, Policy Division; David Krech, Associate Division Chief, Policy Division; Mark Uretsky, Senior Economist, Policy Division; Jodi Cooper, Senior Attorney, Policy Division; and, from the Office of General Counsel, James Bird.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORME DE BANDA ANCHA EN CANARIAS 2014 · Ecanarias 2015 BANDA ANCHAEN OBSERVATORIO CANARIODE CANARIAS 2014 (Edición 2015) INFORME DE
    INFORME DE INFORME DE BANDA ANCHA EN CANARIAS 2014 · eCANARIAS 2015 BANDA ANCHA EN CANARIAS 2014 (edición 2015) OBSERVATORIO CANARIO DE INFORME DE BANDA ANCHA EN CANARIAS 2014 (edición 2015) OBSERVATORIO CANARIO DE LAS TELECOMUNICACIONES Y DE LA SOCIEDAD DE LA INFORMACIÓN Edita: OBSERVATORIO CANARIO DE LAS TELECOMUNICACIONES Y DE LA SOCIEDAD DE LA INFORMACIÓN AGENCIA CANARIA DE INVESTIGACIÓN, INNOVACIÓN Y SOCIEDAD DE LA INFORMACIÓN Avenida de Buenos Aires, 5 Edificio Tres de Mayo, 2ª planta 38071 Santa Cruz de Tenerife C/ León y Castillo, nº 200 Edificio Servicios Múltiples III, 6ª planta 35071 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Febrero de 2016 www.octsi.es Esta obra está distribuida bajo una Licencia Reconocimiento - No comercial – Sin obras derivadas 3.0 España de Creative Commons, disponible en: http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ (resumen) y http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ es/legalcode.es (texto completo). Se permite la copia, distribución y comunicación pública de la obra siempre que se reconoz- ca a sus autores, se realice sin fines comerciales o lucrativos, y no se altere, transforme o genere una obra derivada a partir de ella. Diseño y maquetación: DAUTE DISEÑO, S.L. ÍNDICE I. INTRODUCCIÓN 7 II. RESUMEN EJECUTIVO 9 III. CONTEXTO 13 1. Desarrollo de la banda ancha 13 2. Situación del sector de las telecomunicaciones 22 3. Velocidad de la banda ancha 24 4. Penetración de la banda ancha 27 5. El mercado de la banda ancha 29 5.1. El mercado de fibra oscura de España 33 5.2. Situación competitiva por centrales en España 34 6.
    [Show full text]
  • A Life Cycle Assessment of Fibre Optic Submarine Cable Systems Craig
    Twenty thousand leagues under the sea: A life cycle assessment of fibre optic submarine cable systems Craig Donovan Stockholm 2009 KTH, Department of Urban Planning and Environment Division of Environmental Strategies Research – fms Kungliga Tekniska högskolan Degree Project SoM EX 2009 -40 www.infra.kth.se/fms Twenty thousand leagues under the sea: A life cycle assessment o f fibre optic submarine cable systems Abstract Submarine cables carry the vast majority of transcontinental voice and data traffic. The high capacity and bandwidth of these cables make it possible to transfer large amounts of data around the globe almost instantaneously. Yet, little is known about the potential environmental impacts of a submarine cable from a life cycle perspective. This study applies Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to collect and analyse the potential environmental impacts of a submarine cable system within a single consistent framework. The system boundary is drawn at the limits of the terminal station where the signal is transferred to, or from, the terrestrial network. All significant components and processes within the system boundary have been modelled to account for the flow of resources, energy, wastes and emissions. Data quality analysis is performed on certain variables to evaluate the effect of data uncertainties, data gaps and methodological choices. The results highlight those activities in the life cycle of a submarine cable that have the largest potential environmental impact; namely, electricity use at the terminal station and cable maintenance by purpose-built ship. For example, the results show that 7 grams of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO 2 eq.) are potentially released for every ten thousand gigabit kilometres (10,000Gb·km), given current estimations of used capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the BUREAU of OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Washington, D.C
    Before the BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Washington, D.C. In the Matter of Information Collection: Prospecting for OMB Control No. 1010-0072 Minerals Other Than Oil, Gas, and Sulphur on the Outer Continental Shelf MMAA104000 and Authorizations of Noncommercial Geological and Geophysical Activities; Proposed Collection for OMB Review; Comment Request COMMENTS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SUBMARINE CABLE ASSOCIATION Kent D. Bressie Danielle J. Piñeres HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP 1919 M Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036-3537 +1 202 730 1337 tel Counsel for the North American Submarine Cable Association 2 March 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To implement the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act, and safeguard U.S. national-security and economic interests, the North American Submarine Cable Association (“NASCA”) urges the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”) to modify its information collection in form BOEM-0134 in order to ensure protection of submarine cables, the critical infrastructure that provides almost all international telecommunications and Internet connectivity for the United States and domestic connectivity for Alaska, Hawaii, and various U.S. territories. BOEM should require applicants for permits or other authorizations for geological and geophysical prospecting or scientific research on the U.S. outer continental shelf (“OCS”) related to minerals other than oil, gas, and sulphur (collectively, “mineral prospecting activities”) to identify submarine cables in the vicinity of planned activities and explain how planned mineral prospecting activities will not “unreasonably interfere with” current and planned submarine cables and will ensure compliance with federal laws regarding damage to submarine cables.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastlines Are Reproduced Using GEBCO Digital Atlas, Centenary Edition 2003
    Subsea Cables UK is an industry organisation with the aim of promoting marine safety, safeguarding submarine cables and encouraging excellent practice within the industry. Subsea Cables UK does not broadly differentiate between the Communications, Power and Renewable industry cables as their impact on other seabed stakeholders is so similar. Subsea Cables UK is interested in any cables which land or pass through UK waters including the Exclusive Economic Zone. SOUTH WEST APPROACHES Kingfisher Awareness Chart Kilmore! New Quay! 13°W 30' 12°W 30' 11°W 30' 10°W 30' IRELAN9D°! W 30' 8°W 30' 7°W 30' 6°W 30' 5°W 30' 4°W 30' 3°W C U ! E K L - T I ! I R 52°N C 52°N E Fishguard ( L O A Cork O N REPUBLIC OF IRELAND ! S D ) Saltees Ground + C ! 4 R St. David's 4 O ( 0 S ) S ¥ 8 WALES 4 I ! 5 N 7 G 5 5 2 5 9 + 9 4 Kinsale 9 4 Milford! Haven ! ( 0 ) 2 0 8 Swansea 5 ! Ballycotton Ground 1 Dursey Island ! 0 Turbot Bank 3 1 Our aim is to optimise coexistence and minimise any hazards 1 Oxwich 9 ! P NYMPHE 0 T 520 + A 7 674 30' 4 T 0)20 ! 30' 4 +44( ( IR S Cardiff 0 OLA ) I S 2 S Marine Safety 0 H 7 B Kinsale Head Grounds 6 R S 7 W 4 A BANK 5 N AN 2 C S 0 H E 0 00 The Smalls Ground A/ 452 BR 7 67 EA (0)20 N +4 +44 4(0 ) 0 g 2 207 67452 0 H Se 5200 RT 674 U + O 7 K I N )20 AL (0 G 4 - N 44 U I I + T 4 R M AT OR E T P ( E E P - S K 0 G U L ! E ) P A A O 2 N Lundy Island UR 98 T .E 2 0 6 D W 6 8 A 2 1 T 9 TA 8 C 00 + 5 54 08 R 1 06 0 4 caused by the installation or presence of submarine cables to other sea bed users.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Circuit Capacity Data for US-International Submarine Cables
    2019 Circuit Capacity Data For U.S.-International Submarine Cables Table 1 Section 43.82 Circuit Capacity Filers (2019) – Entities that filed a cable operator and/or capacity holder report. Table 2 Number of Reports Filed By Submarine Cable Operators (2019) Table 3 Submarine Cable Operator Reports (in Gbps) (2019/2021) – Information on available and planned capacity data for each U.S.-international submarine cable on an individual and regional basis. Table 4 Submarine Cable Operator Capacity Trend Data (in Gbps) – Detailed capacity trend data for each U.S.-international submarine cable. Table 5 Submarine Cable Capacity Holder Reports by Region (2019) – Information regarding capacity holder data (i.e., cable capacity leased or owned) on a regional basis. Table 6 Percentage of Total Available Capacity Reported (2019) – Information regarding the capacity reported in the cable operator reports and owned capacity in the capacity holder reports on a regional basis. Attachment A U.S.-International Submarine Cables – Landing Points by Region, Cable, and Foreign Landing Point as of December 31, 2019 Attachment B U.S.-International Submarine Cables – Landing Points by Region, Foreign Landing Point, and Cable as of December 31, 2019 Attachment C U.S.-International Submarine Cables – Landing Points by Number of Landing Points Per Country and Region and a Frequency Table Summarizing Foreign Landing Points Per Country as of December 31, 2019 Source: International Bureau, Federal Communications Commission For definitions of terms and instructions on filing procedures, please refer to the Filing Manual (Feb. 2020) For further information on current and past reports, see https://www.fcc.gov/circuit-capacity-data-us-international-submarine-cables Table 1 Section 43.82 Circuit Capacity Filers (2019) Submarine Submarine Cable Cable Capacity No.
    [Show full text]
  • ITU-Dstudygroups
    ITU-D Study Groups Study period 2018-2021 Broadband development and connectivity solutions for rural and Question 5/1 Telecommunications/ remote areas ICTs for rural and remote areas Executive summary This annual deliverable reviews major backbone telecommunication Annual deliverable infrastructure installation efforts and approaches to last-mile connectivity, 2019-2020 describes current trends in last-mile connectivity and policy interventions and recommended last-mile technologies for use in rural and remote areas, as well as in small island developing States (SIDS). Discussions and contributions made during a workshop on broadband development in rural areas, held in September 2019, have been included in this document, which concludes with two sets of high-level recommendations for regulators and policy-makers, and for operators to use as guidelines for connecting rural and remote communities. 1 More information on ITU-D study groups: E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +41 22 730 5999 Web: www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/study-groups ITU -D Study Groups Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 3 Trends in telecommunication/ICT backbone infrastructure 4 Last mile-connectivity 5 Trends in last-mile connectivity 6 Business regulatory models and policies 7 Recommendations and guidelines for regulators and policy-makers 8 Recommendations and guidelines for operators 9 Annex 1: Map of the global submarine cable network 11 Annex 2: Listing of submarine cables (A-Y) 12 2 More information on ITU-D study groups: E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +41 22 730 5999 Web: www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/study-groups ITU -D Study Groups Introduction The telecommunications/ICT sector and technologies have evolved over a long period of time, starting with ancient communication systems such as drum beating and smoke signals to the electric telegraph, the fixed telephone, radio and television, transistors, video telephony and satellite.
    [Show full text]
  • PTC Academy Pioneering Technologies Keith Shaw
    Keith Russell Shaw EMEA September 2019 Confidential – © 2018 Equinix Inc. Equinix.com 1 § A submarine cable is a cable laid on the sea bed between land- based stations to carry telecommunication signals across stretches Global of the ocean and sea. § As of early 2019, there are approximately 428* submarine cables in Connectivity service around the world. * The total number of cables is constantly changing as new cables enter service and older cable are decommissioned. Confidential – © 2018 Equinix Inc. Equinix.com 2 Summary of current SubSea Cable landscape from the various Suppliers viewpoints Confidential – © 2018 Equinix Inc. Equinix.com 3 Introduction to Open Cables • Outlining key considerations when designing or purchasing a new submarine cable, open or otherwise • It is intended to help ensure the network is upgradeable day 1, or in the future, to best leverage the significant investment made • The benefits of open cables have become generally accepted • within the submarine cable industry. Confidential – © 2018 Equinix Inc. Equinix.com 4 Introduction to Open Cables – Technologies – Breaking the mould Business benefits are: • Freedom to choose best-in-breed vendors with the decision based purely on their wet plant performance • Freedom to choose a best-in-breed Submarine Line Terminal Equipment (SLTE) at a later date, taking full advantage of: Faster innovation cycles Trends toward Point-of-Presence (POP-to-POP) and DC Interconnection Traffic patterns, away from (CLS-to-CLS), are more fitting Submarine upgrade vendors with strong
    [Show full text]
  • Submarine Telecoms INDUSTRY REPORT 2012
    submarine telecoms INDUSTRY REPORT 2012 1 Submarine Cable Industry Report Issue 1 July 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Submarine Telecoms Forum, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or by any information storage retrieval system without the written permission of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Submarine Telecoms Forum, Inc. 21495 Ridgetop Circle Suite 201 Sterling, Virginia 20166 USA www.subtelforum.com ISSN: applied for 2 Disclaimer: While every care is taken in preparation of this publication, the publishers cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of the information herein, or any errors which may occur in advertising or editorial content, or any consequence arising from any errors or omissions, and the editor reserves the right to edit any advertising or editorial material submitted for publication. If you have a suggestion, please let us know by emailing [email protected]. 3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 13 2.0 Worldwide Market Analysis and Outlook 14 2.1 Connecting the Unconnected 14 2.2 Overview of Historical System Investment 15 2.3 2008 to 2012 Systems in Review 16 2.4 Systems Investment Beyond 2012 17 2.5 Decommissioning 18 3.0 Supplier Analysis 20 3.1 System Suppliers 20 3.2 Upgrade Suppliers 20 4.0 Ownership Analysis 23 4.1 Financing of Current Submarine Systems 23 4.2 Financing of Proposed Submarine Systems 23 5.0 Recent
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1 Section 43.62 Circuit Capacity Filers (2015) Table 2 U.S
    2015 Circuit Capacity Data For U.S.-International Submarine Cables Table 1 Section 43.62 Circuit Capacity Filers (2015) Table 2 U.S. International Submarine Cable Operator Filers (2015) Table 3 Satellite and Terrestrial Circuits (in 64 kbps) (2015) Table 4(A) Submarine Cable Operator Reports (in Gbps) (2015/2017) – Information on available and planned capacity data for each U.S.-international submarine cable on an individual and regional basis. Table 4(B) U.S. International Submarine Cable Capacity (in Gbps) – Detailed capacity trend data for each U.S.-international submarine cable. Table 5 Submarine Cable Capacity Holder Reports (2015) – Information regarding capacity holder data (i.e., cable capacity leased or owned) on a regional basis. Table 6 Percentage of Total Available Capacity Reported (2015) – Information regarding the capacity reported in the cable operator reports and owned capacity in the capacity holder reports on a regional basis. Attachment A U.S. International Submarine Cables - Landing Points Sorted by Region, Cable, and Foreign Landing Point Attachment B U.S. International Submarine Cables - Landing Points Sorted by Region, Foreign Landing Point, and Cable Attachment C U.S. International Submarine Cables - Countries Sorted by the Number of Landing Points Source: International Bureau, Federal Communications Commission *This version includes minor technical and conforming revisions in the Tables and Attachments of the revised 2015 U.S. International Circuit Capacity Report that was released in July 2018 (Revised Report). The changes are reflected in Tables 1, 2, 4(A), 4(B), and 5 and Attachments A and B. Table 1 Section 43.62 Circuit Capacity Filers (2015) Satellite Circuits Reports Submarine Submarine Non- Terrestrial No.
    [Show full text]