DOCSLIB.ORG

Science Diplomacy Worldwide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The AAAS Center for Science Diplomacy helped advance international collaboration in 2013 by reaching out to scientists and policymakers SCIENCE worldwide. Projects ranged from coordinating new monitoring of DIPLOMACY a volcano in North Korea, to helping to convene experts from the WORLDWIDE developing world to work together on resource issues requiring science-based solutions. Science diplomacy initiated by AAAS fostered global progress in many areas and improved quality of life, while encouraging good relations between countries. SCIENCE & DIPLOMACY IMPACTS PEPFAR halted a precipitous plunge in Recent history abounds with little- life expectancy in Africa that came with the known examples of international science HIV/AIDS epidemic. It also established solid collaborations that have achieved great partnerships with African countries, building goals, not the least of which is improved and strengthening U.S. ties in that region. relations, mutual trust, and peaceful, Science & Diplomacy, which was launched productive cooperation between countries. with support from the Golden Family One such example is the U.S. President’s Foundation, brings expert perspectives on Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), issues involving science and international which was described in a 2013 issue relations to policy analysts, government of Science & Diplomacy, the quarterly ocials, scientists, and educators. According publication of the AAAS Center for Science to a recent survey, 18% of readers work Diplomacy. Author Harold Varmus, director for a government, 45% are in academia, of the National Cancer Institute and winner and 17% work for a think tank or nonprot of the Nobel Prize, pointed out that by 2012, organization. In 2013, articles ranged from a PEPFAR had through bilateral agreements discussion about engaging with North Korea between the U.S. and African countries through protection of its biodiversity, to an Maps reflecting the global distribution of supplied about 5 million patients in the examination of the value of collaboration working physicians (le) developing world with antiretroviral drugs— with Iran in the medical and health sciences. HIV infections (middle), up from 1.7 million in 2008—while protecting and AIDS-related deaths (right) in 2002-2004 nearly a million infants from maternally SCIENCE ENGAGEMENT WITH show the disease’s transmitted HIV, as well as testing nearly 50 NORTH KOREA outsized burden compared to available million people for infection and distributing The AAAS Center for Science Diplomacy medical care. prevention information and condoms. helped launch an unprecedented scientic OPPOSITE WORLDMAPPER; THIS PAGE ©¤¥¦§ KOSIMA WEBER LIU ©EEMPª LIU WEBER KOSIMA ©¤¥¦§ PAGE THIS WORLDMAPPER; OPPOSITE 10 collaboration in 2013, bringing American and the Pyongyang International Information Above le, researchers British scientic resources to North Korea for Center on New Technology and Economy, confer beside one of six stations built on Mount cooperative seismological research and rock a nongovernmental organization. The Paektu to monitor seismic sampling on North Korea’s sacred volcano project was arranged by the Environmental activity. Mount Paektu. Until the collaboration began, Education Media Project, a non-prot Above right, Korean data from the North Korean side of the focused on ecosystem management. Earthquake Bureau mountain, which has two-thirds of its mass The funding for the construction and geologist Kim Ju Song (le), Clive Oppenheimer, in China, was unavailable. maintenance of eld stations to house and Kayla Iacovino “This e®ort represents an exciting six seismometers, as well as other explore a Mount Paektu demonstration of active cooperation logistics, came from the Richard Lounsbery dried lava creek. between Western and North Korean Foundation in Washington, D.C. British scientists in the elds of volcanology and organizations, including the Royal Society, seismology, and so far it appears to be were also instrumental in bringing the working very well,” said Norman Neureiter, project to fruition. senior advisor to the AAAS Center for Science Diplomacy. “It has the potential of SUPPORTING SCIENCE THROUGH leading to a program of extended scientic DIPLOMACY cooperation with North Korea.” Vaughan Turekian, director of the AAAS Two years in the making, the research Center for Science Diplomacy, addressed collaboration will not only provide new scientists and policy experts from the monitoring data and scientic insight to developing world at a 2013 workshop held volcanologists around the world, it will also at The World Academy of Sciences (TWAS). help to predict and quantify the volcano’s Advocating smaller and developing nations’ future eruptions. Mount Paektu last erupted increased involvement in science diplomacy, about a thousand years ago, spewing ash Turekian pointed out that even nations just over more than 33,000 square kilometers beginning to build their scientic strength of northeast China and Korea. A decade could use science diplomacy as a means ago, small tremors at the volcano motivated of increased and improved interaction with Chinese and Korean authorities to increase other countries. their monitoring. At the event, which was part of a science One of the rst scientic collaborations diplomacy program organized by AAAS and between the Democratic People’s Republic TWAS, Turekian spoke of the event’s value of Korea (DPRK) and the West, the as a means of advancing science globally monitoring arrangement began in 2011 by bringing together experts from the OPPOSITE WORLDMAPPER; THIS PAGE ©¤¥¦§ KOSIMA WEBER LIU ©EEMPª LIU WEBER KOSIMA ©¤¥¦§ PAGE THIS WORLDMAPPER; OPPOSITE with the support of AAAS, at the request of developing and the developed worlds. 11 Above le, at the World The AAAS/TWAS science diplomacy program all the participants in a collaboration are full Science Forum, Science “is connecting science and diplomacy to partners, that they focus on issues of local Editor-in-Chief Marcia McNutt described an two organizations that have access to a very importance, that they nd ways to deal with urgent need for better broad scientic community,” Turekian said. resource disparities among the countries approaches to the sus- represented, and that they agree upon tainable management of resources. WORLD SCIENCE FORUM, RIO DE JANEIRO standards and values regarding scientic Addiction researchers in the United States ethics, intellectual property, and publication Above right, an increase in U.S. shale gas explora- and China have explored more e®ective or access issues. tion has had global im- local approaches to addiction treatment Science Editor-in-Chief Marcia NcNutt also pacts, speakers said at a using traditional Chinese medicine and presented at the international event. forum sponsored by Hita- chi, Ltd. and co-organized “Western” medicine. U.S. scientists have by AAAS and the Brook- traveled to Iran for the country’s rst HIV/ U.S.±POLISH SCIENCE COLLABORATIONS ings Institution. Shown AIDS conference, where they mapped out AAAS and the Foundation for Polish Science are (l-r): Jonathan Fink, Portland State Univer- promising areas for collaboration. At a launched a new award in 2013 honoring sity; Gretchen Goldman, workshop in Uganda, researchers from the scientists “who have made exceptional Center for Science and United States, the United Kingdom, and research achievements as a result of Polish- Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists; several African countries brainstormed American scientic cooperation.” The Vaughan Turekian, AAAS; strategies to improve the treatment of award recognizes a long history of U.S.- and Sean J. O’Brien, state representative for Ohio’s mental, neurological, and substance-use Polish science collaboration across many 63rd district. disorders in Sub-Saharan Africa. disciplines, said AAAS Chief International These examples illustrate health science Ocer Turekian, who added: “As we diplomacy bringing nations together to move forward, the initiative will help us to address local and regional health challenges identify areas where international research while also encouraging positive international cooperation can both advance science and relations, said Alan I. Leshner, CEO of AAAS, build closer societal relationships.” at the 2013 World Science Forum in Rio de Poland’s primary scientic strengths, Janeiro. “Science diplomacy is now a force according to a 2013 report by the European in global health, science policy, and foreign Commission, encompass food, agriculture policy,” he said. and sheries; energy; the environment; The examples also revealed some information and communication principles key to successful science technologies; and certain areas of materials diplomacy, Leshner said in a roundtable science. discussion at the forum, which attracted participants from more than 100 countries. Those principles include making sure that SCHAFFER CARLA RIGHT: LACERDA; CRISTINA LEFT: 12.
Recommended publications
  • The Past As Prologue,” Science & Diplomacy, Vol

    The Past As Prologue,” Science & Diplomacy, Vol

    Vaughan C. Turekian and Norman P. Neureiter, “Science and Diplomacy: The Past as Prologue,” Science & Diplomacy, Vol. 1, No. 1 (March 2012). http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/editorial/2012/science-and-diplomacy. This copy is for non-commercial use only. More articles, perspectives, editorials, and letters can be found at www.sciencediplomacy.org. Science & Diplomacy is published by the Center for Science Diplomacy of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the world’s largest general scientific society. Science and Diplomacy: The Past as Prologue Vaughan C. Turekian and Norman P. Neureiter HIS past December marked twenty years since the dissolution of the Soviet TUnion quietly and peacefully ended the Cold War. While that era saw the Cuban Missile Crisis, proxy wars, and policies of mutual assured destruction, it was also a period when people on both sides of the conflict looked for ways to bridge differences and increase the chances for peace and resolution. In a 1985 address to the nation days before meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev for the first time, President Ronald Reagan stated “We can find, as yet undiscovered, avenues where American and Soviet citizens can cooperate fruitfully for the benefit of mankind . In science and technology, we could launch new joint space ventures and establish joint medical research projects.” Two years later, John Negroponte, the President’s Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES), further articulated the Administration’s view during congressional testimony: “It would be short-sighted of us not to recognize that it is in our national interest to seek to expand scientific cooperation with the Soviet Union.” In many ways, the Cold War was a time of highly effective use of science diplomacy to build bridges and connections despite the existence of great political tensions.
  • American Diplomacy Project: a US Diplomatic Service for the 21St

    American Diplomacy Project: a US Diplomatic Service for the 21St

    AMERICAN DIPLOMACY PROJECT A U.S. Diplomatic Service for the 21st Century Ambassador Nicholas Burns Ambassador Marc Grossman Ambassador Marcie Ries REPORT NOVEMBER 2020 American Diplomacy Project: A U.S. Diplomatic Service for the 21st Century Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Design and layout by Auge+Gray+Drake Collective Works Copyright 2020, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America FULL PROJECT NAME American Diplomacy Project A U.S. Diplomatic Service for the 21st Century Ambassador Nicholas Burns Ambassador Marc Grossman Ambassador Marcie Ries REPORT NOVEMBER 2020 Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs | Harvard Kennedy School i ii American Diplomacy Project: A U.S. Diplomatic Service for the 21st Century Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................3 10 Actions to Reimagine American Diplomacy and Reinvent the Foreign Service ........................................................5 Action 1 Redefine the Mission and Mandate of the U.S. Foreign Service ...................................................10 Action 2 Revise the Foreign Service Act ................................. 16 Action 3 Change the Culture ..................................................
  • 과학외교를 위한 데이터기반의 연구주제선정 방법 Data-Driven Approach to Identify Research Topics for Science and Technology Diplomacy

    과학외교를 위한 데이터기반의 연구주제선정 방법 Data-Driven Approach to Identify Research Topics for Science and Technology Diplomacy

    https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.11.216 과학외교를 위한 데이터기반의 연구주제선정 방법 Data-Driven Approach to Identify Research Topics for Science and Technology Diplomacy 여운동, 김선호, 이방래, 노경란 한국과학기술정보연구원 RnD투자분석센터 Woon-Dong Yeo([email protected]), Seonho Kim([email protected]) BangRae Lee([email protected]), Kyung-Ran Noh([email protected]) 요약 두 국가가 본격적으로 외교적 협약을 진행하기 전 우호적인 분위기를 만들기 위해서나, 국가간 정치적 우호 관계를 지속하기 위한 목적 등으로 과학외교를 사용한다. 최근에는 과학기술이 국가 발전에 미치는 영향이 커짐에 따라서 과학외교에 대한 관심이 더욱 집중되고 있다. 과학외교를 수행하기 위해 두 국가가 서로 흥미를 가질 수 있는 협동연구주제를 찾는 것은 전문가 집단에 의해 추천에 의해 이뤄진다. 그러나 이 방법은 전문가 의 주관적 판단에 의지하기 때문에 편향성과 이에 따른 문제가 존재한다. 개인적 및 조직적 편향, 유명한 연구 자의 후광효과, 전문가마다 다른 추천기준 등이 있을 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 전문가 기반의 방식이 가지는 문제점을 극복하기 위해 한국에서 시도된 빅데이터 기반의 외교를 위한 연구주제 추천방법을 소개한다. 빅데 이터를 분석하기 위한 알고리즘은 전통적인 연구분야인 계량서지학 뿐만 아니라 최신 딥러닝 기술을 사용한 다. 제안된 방식은 한국과 헝가리 간의 과학외교에 사용되었으며, 데이터기반 주제선정 방식의 가능성을 확인 할 수 있었다. ■ 중심어 :∣과학계량학∣추천시스템∣계량서지학∣딥러닝∣과학외교∣ Abstract In science and technology diplomacy, major countries actively utilize their capabilities in science and technology for public diplomacy, especially for promoting diplomatic relations with politically sensitive regions and countries. Recently, with an increase in the influence of science and technology on national development, interest in science and technology diplomacy has increased. So far, science and technology diplomacy has relied on experts to find research topics that are of common interest to both the countries.
  • Political Issues of Paradiplomacy: Lessons from the Developed World

    Political Issues of Paradiplomacy: Lessons from the Developed World

    DISCUSSION PAPERS IN DIPLOMACY Political Issues of Paradiplomacy: Lessons from the Developed World André Lecours Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ ISSN 1569-2981 DISCUSSION PAPERS IN DIPLOMACY Editors: Virginie Duthoit & Ellen Huijgh, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ Managing Editor: Jan Melissen, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ and Antwerp University Desk top publishing: Desiree Davidse Editorial Board Geoff Berridge, University of Leicester Rik Coolsaet, University of Ghent Erik Goldstein, Boston University Alan Henrikson, Tufts University Donna Lee, Birmingham University Spencer Mawby, University of Nottingham Paul Sharp, University of Minnesota Duluth Copyright Notice © André Lecours, December 2008 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy, or transmission of this publication, or part thereof in excess of one paragraph (other than as a PDF file at the discretion of the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’) may be made without the written permission of the author. ABSTRACT Regional governments can be international actors. This phenomenon of regional governments developing international relations, often called ‘paradiplomacy,’ has been most visible in Western industrialized liberal- democracies. In thinking about paradiplomacy in developing and post- communist countries, considering the experience of regions such as Quebec, Catalonia, the Basque Country, Flanders and Wallonia could be instructive for understanding the logic of this activity, highlighting key choices that need to be made, and pointing out potential challenges stemming from the development by sub-state units of international relations. This paper begins by distinguishing between three layers of paradiplomacy and makes the argument that paradiplomacy can be a multifunctional vehicle for the promotion of interests and identity. It then discusses the various choices that have to be made when developing a paradiplomacy, including designing new structures and selecting partners.
  • The Diplomatic Mission of Archbishop Flavio Chigi, Apostolic Nuncio to Paris, 1870-71

    The Diplomatic Mission of Archbishop Flavio Chigi, Apostolic Nuncio to Paris, 1870-71

    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1974 The Diplomatic Mission of Archbishop Flavio Chigi, Apostolic Nuncio to Paris, 1870-71 Christopher Gerard Kinsella Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Recommended Citation Kinsella, Christopher Gerard, "The Diplomatic Mission of Archbishop Flavio Chigi, Apostolic Nuncio to Paris, 1870-71" (1974). Dissertations. 1378. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1378 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1974 Christopher Gerard Kinsella THE DIPLOMATIC MISSION OF ARCHBISHOP FLAVIO CHIGI APOSTOLIC NUNCIO TO PARIS, 1870-71 by Christopher G. Kinsella t I' A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty:of the Graduate School of Loyola Unive rsi.ty in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy February, 197 4 \ ' LIFE Christopher Gerard Kinsella was born on April 11, 1944 in Anacortes, Washington. He was raised in St. Louis, where he received his primary and secondary education, graduating from St. Louis University High School in June of 1962, He received an Honors Bachelor of Arts cum laude degree from St. Louis University,.., majoring in history, in June of 1966 • Mr. Kinsella began graduate studies at Loyola University of Chicago in September of 1966. He received a Master of Arts (Research) in History in February, 1968 and immediately began studies for the doctorate.
  • Diplomatic Processes and Cultural Variations: the Relevance of Culture in Diplomacy

    Diplomatic Processes and Cultural Variations: the Relevance of Culture in Diplomacy

    Diplomatic Processes and Cultural Variations: The Relevance of Culture in Diplomacy by Wilfried Bolewski Let us not be blind to our differences—but let us also direct attention to our common interests and to the means by which those differences can be resolved. And if we cannot now end our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. John F. Kennedy, American University, June 10, 1963. The relationship between diplomacy and culture has been somewhat neglected in recent academic and practical studies,1 even though competence and understanding during intercultural exchanges unites societies and facilitates further intercultural interactions. Current public discussions concentrate exclusively on the existence of cultural commonalities and universal values all cultures share.2 However, determining likenesses among cultures should be secondary to the awareness of cultural differences as the logical starting point for the evaluation of intercultural commonalities. Intercultural sensitivity within groups paves the way for the acceptance and tolerance of other cultures and allows members to be open to values which are universal among all groups, such as law and justice, which globalized society should then build upon together. Facing the challenges of an increasingly complex world, the question of interdependency between diplomatic processes and cultural variations becomes relevant: is there a shared professional culture in diplomacy apart from national ones, and if so, does it influence diplomacy? To what extent can research into national cultures help diplomacy and governments to understand international interactions? DEFINITION OF “CULTURE”3 General definition Before analyzing the interdependency between culture and diplomacy, it is necessary to state what the word culture implies.
  • What Is a Science Diplomat?

    What Is a Science Diplomat?

    The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (2020) 409-423 brill.com/hjd What Is a Science Diplomat? Lorenzo Melchor Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology (FECYT), Madrid, Spain; former FECYT Science Adviser in the Spanish Embassy in London, United Kingdom [email protected] Received: 22 May 2020; revised: 4 July 2020; accepted: 21 July 2020 Summary The COVID-19 crisis has shown how countries initially responded to a global chal- lenge on their own, instead of relying on a multilateral science diplomacy — based response. Although, science diplomacy has received great attention for the past de- cade, its meaning and the nature of the diverse practitioners involved remain elusive. Science diplomacy is a transboundary field sitting across national borders, policy frameworks and stakeholders of all natures and professional backgrounds. But what is a science diplomat? What science diplomacy roles formally exist? Who can become a science diplomat? What knowledge and skills are required? This practitioner’s essay proposes a typology of science diplomacy practitioners who bring science, technology, innovation, foreign policy and the international political system altogether closer in either institutionalised or non-institutionalised roles, and it also provides guidance for pursuing a career in science diplomacy. These science diplomats may promote na- tional competitiveness but also facilitate multilateral responses to global challenges. Keywords science diplomacy – science diplomat – science counsellor – science attaché – science adviser – science advice – science-policy interface – knowledge diplomacy – COVID-19 © Lorenzo Melchor, 2020 | doi:10.1163/1871191X-bja10026 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded license. from Brill.com10/01/2021 11:43:18AM via free access 410 Melchor 1 Introduction1 The COVID-19 outbreak has caused a profound global public health and socio- economic crisis.
  • Constitutional Solutions to the Problem of Diplomatic Crime and Immunity William G

    Constitutional Solutions to the Problem of Diplomatic Crime and Immunity William G

    Hofstra Law Review Volume 36 | Issue 2 Article 19 2007 Constitutional Solutions to the Problem of Diplomatic Crime and Immunity William G. Morris Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Morris, William G. (2007) "Constitutional Solutions to the Problem of Diplomatic Crime and Immunity," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 36: Iss. 2, Article 19. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol36/iss2/19 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Morris: Constitutional Solutions to the Problem of Diplomatic Crime and I NOTE CONSTITUTIONAL SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEM OF DIPLOMATIC CRIME AND IMMUNITY I. INTRODUCTION No one is above the law. This principle has been a driving force throughout the great ideological experiment known as democracy. From childhood, we are told that people who commit crimes must answer for them. However, the simplistic nature of this notion fails to capture the whole truth of the nuanced system of international law. International law permits certain individuals to escape accountability for their crimes. For centuries, the principle of diplomatic immunity has enabled foreign diplomats to avoid prosecution for violations of the host country's laws. 1 The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, to which the United States is a party, has codified customary international law.2 The Vienna Convention grants diplomats, their families, and diplomatic property numerous protections.
  • Toward a New Diplomatic History of Medieval and Early Modern Europe

    Toward a New Diplomatic History of Medieval and Early Modern Europe

    a Toward a New Diplomatic History of Medieval and Early Modern Europe John Watkins University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota The time has come for a multidisciplinary reevaluation of one of the old- est, and traditionally one of the most conservative, subfields in the modern discipline of history: the study of premodern diplomacy. Diplomatic studies are often bracketed aside from other areas of investigation and seem imper- meable to theoretical and methodological innovations that have transformed almost every other sector of the profession. Scholars interested in race, eth- nicity, gender, sexuality, subalternity, and new modes of intellectual history have occasionally used diplomatic sources, but they have rarely investigated the diplomatic practices that created those sources in the first place. The modern cross-disciplinary study of international relations has broadened the discussion of diplomatic issues for later historical periods, but the presentist biases of that conversation — centered on nineteenth-century understand- ings of the nation — have limited its application to the medieval and early modern periods. Nor has diplomacy figured significantly in the dialogue with his- tory that has transformed literary studies within the last three decades. In some ways, nothing could be stranger than the literary critic’s lack of atten- tion to diplomatic theory and practice. Many of the most familiar figures in European literary canons spent a significant portion of their career in diplomatic service, such as Petrarch, Chaucer, Wyatt, Sidney, Tasso, and Montaigne. Diplomacy also figures in the careers of newly discovered and newly rediscovered women writers such as Veronica Gàmbara and Margue- rite de Navarre. But an emphasis on power relationships within individual polities characterizes literary study in the wake of new historicism.
  • Discussion Paper on Science Diplomacy

    Discussion Paper on Science Diplomacy

    DISCUSSION PAPER SCIENCE DIPLOMACY: THE ROLE OF RESEARCH COUNCILS AND THE GLOBAL RESEARCH COUNCIL Introduction Scientists have always been at the forefront of international collaboration, and, for centuries, science has been used for international relations purposes around the world. Hence science diplomacy is a new term for an old concept. Science diplomacy needs to adapt to varying contexts and circumstances. There are today neither commonly accepted guidelines on how to perform science diplomacy nor a precise definition of what the concept describes. However, in 2010, the Royal Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) issued a report describing three forms of science diplomacy: science in diplomacy - informing foreign policy objectives with scientific advice; science for diplomacy - using science cooperation to improve diplomatic relations; and diplomacy for science - facilitating international science cooperation.1 Responsibility for science diplomacy, within any country, is typically shared across institutional structures especially science and foreign ministries. Science diplomacy can aim to: Advance domestic needs; address cross-border or regional interests; tackle global needs and challenges.2 Science Diplomacy occurs in the respect of all applicable laws and regulations at national and international levels. Through a series of five regional meetings (October 2017 – January 2018), GRC participants have initiated a reflection about their role as research councils in science diplomacy, about the role of international collaboration amongst research councils in general and collaboration within the GRC in promoting and advancing science diplomacy. This initial phase resulted in the identification of key guiding principles and suggested approaches. The latter was discussed at the seventh GRC Annual Meeting on 14-16 May 2018 in Moscow.
  • Vatican Secret Diplomacy This Page Intentionally Left Blank Charles R

    Vatican Secret Diplomacy This Page Intentionally Left Blank Charles R

    vatican secret diplomacy This page intentionally left blank charles r. gallagher, s.j. Vatican Secret Diplomacy joseph p. hurley and pope pius xii yale university press new haven & london Disclaimer: Some images in the printed version of this book are not available for inclusion in the eBook. Copyright © 2008 by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Set in Scala and Scala Sans by Duke & Company, Devon, Pennsylvania. Printed in the United States of America by Sheridan Books, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gallagher, Charles R., 1965– Vatican secret diplomacy : Joseph P. Hurley and Pope Pius XII / Charles R. Gallagher. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-300-12134-6 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Hurley, Joseph P. 2. Pius XII, Pope, 1876–1958. 3. World War, 1939–1945— Religious aspects—Catholic Church. 4. Catholic Church—Foreign relations. I. Title. BX4705.H873G35 2008 282.092—dc22 [B] 2007043743 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Com- mittee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To my father and in loving memory of my mother This page intentionally left blank contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 1 A Priest in the Family 8 2 Diplomatic Observer: India and Japan, 1927–1934 29 3 Silencing Charlie: The Rev.
  • Science, Technology, and the “Special Relationship”: a Re-Examination of Britain's Support for the Strategic Defense

    Science, Technology, and the “Special Relationship”: a Re-Examination of Britain's Support for the Strategic Defense

    Aaron Bateman, “Science, Technology, and the “Special Relationship”: A Re-examination of Britain’s Support for the Strategic Defense Initiative” Science & Diplomacy, Vol. 8, No. 1 (May 2019). http://sciencediplomacy.org/article/2019/science-technology-and-special- relationship This copy is for non-commercial use only. More articles, perspectives, editorials, and letters can be found at www.sciencediplomacy.org. Science & Diplomacy is published by the Center for Science Diplomacy of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the world’s largest general scientific society. Science, Technology, and the “Special Relationship”: A Re-examination of Britain’s Support for the Strategic Defense Initiative Aaron Bateman n March 1983, President Ronald Reagan called upon the American scientific com- Imunity to use its talents to develop a capability that would render nuclear weap- ons obsolete. The president’s vision for a nuclear-free world became the basis for his Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), a concept for a multi-layered missile defense system with interceptors on land and in space. However, even though SDI had the potential to fundamentally change NATO’s nuclear strategy and the balance of power between the United States and the USSR, the U.S.’s European allies were not consulted prior to President Reagan’s speech. Now, due to the declassification of British national security documents from Margaret Thatcher’s tenure as prime minister, it is possible to begin investigating the British motivations for participat- ing in SDI. Publicly, the British supported SDI and its political objectives, but for- merly top-secret documents from the British Ministry of Defense (MoD), Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), and the senior British scientific advisor to the prime minister reveal a more complicated British attitude toward SDI.