DOCSLIB.ORG

Brooklyn Queens Connector Rapid Assessment.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brooklyn Queens Connector Rapid Assessment.Pdf Table of Contents 1.0 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 1 4.1.2 Bridges ........................................................................................................................................ 14 4.1.3 Infrastructure/Superstructure ...................................................................................................... 14 1.1 STUDY BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................... 1 4.1.4 Stations ....................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 BQX PROPOSAL: 2015 STUDY ......................................................................................... 1 4.2 CONSTRUCTION PLANNING/SCHEDULE CONSIDERATIONS ................................................ 14 1.3 OUTLINE OF THIS RAPID ASSESSMENT REPORT ................................................................. 2 5.0 OPERATING COST ESTIMATE ........................................................................................ 15 2.0 ALIGNMENT ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 2 5.1.1 Review of 2015 Study Plan and O&M Cost Estimate ................................................................. 15 2.1 RIGHT-OF-WAY TYPE (EXCLUSIVE, SBS TYPE, SHARED) ................................................... 2 2.2 PARKING AND TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL IMPACTS ................................................................ 2 6.0 RIDERSHIP FORECAST ................................................................................................... 15 2.2.1 Parking .......................................................................................................................................... 2 6.1 REVIEW OF BQX ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGY ...................................................... 15 2.2.2 Street Operations .......................................................................................................................... 2 6.1.1 Methodology and Approach ........................................................................................................ 15 2.2.3 Bicycle Activity .............................................................................................................................. 3 6.1.2 Current Corridor Ridership ......................................................................................................... 16 2.2.4 Truck Routes ................................................................................................................................. 3 6.1.3 Growth in Future Ridership ......................................................................................................... 17 2.2.5 Loading, Delivery and Servicing ................................................................................................... 3 6.1.4 Historical Growth Rates .............................................................................................................. 17 2.2.6 Accessibility .................................................................................................................................. 3 6.1.5 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.7 Safety ............................................................................................................................................ 3 6.2 THE RIDERSHIP FORECASTING APPROACH ...................................................................... 17 2.2.8 Next Steps .................................................................................................................................... 3 6.2.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.3 TRACK LOCATION AND GEOMETRY ................................................................................... 4 6.2.2 Select Ridership for BQX ............................................................................................................ 19 2.4 TRANSIT OPERATIONS (SCHEDULE, TRAVEL TIME, FLEET SIZE, TRANSFER) ........................ 4 6.2.3 Projected Growth in the Corridor ................................................................................................ 19 2.4.1 Proposed Travel Times ................................................................................................................. 4 6.2.4 Projected System-wide Ridership and Revenue ........................................................................ 19 2.4.2 Travel Time Calculations .............................................................................................................. 4 6.3 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................... 20 2.4.3 Service Levels ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.4.4 Operating Plan Requirements ...................................................................................................... 5 7.0 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/VALUE CAPTURE ............................................................ 22 2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES ........................................................................................ 5 7.1 REVIEW OF 2015 BQX STUDY ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGY ................................... 22 2.6 UTILITY ISSUES ................................................................................................................ 6 7.1.1 Assumptions and Methodology of the 2015 BQX Study Benefit-Cost Analysis and Base Model 22 2.6.1 Utility Assessment......................................................................................................................... 6 7.1.2 Modifications to Base Model Assumptions for the Rapid Assessment ...................................... 22 2.6.2 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................ 6 7.1.3 Conclusions and Recommendations .......................................................................................... 23 2.6.3 Further Study ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.7 BRIDGES ......................................................................................................................... 7 8.0 GOVERNANCE .................................................................................................................. 23 2.7.1 Structural Findings ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.7.2 Mechanical Findings ..................................................................................................................... 8 9.0 PEER CITY RESEARCH ................................................................................................... 23 2.7.3 Electrical Findings ......................................................................................................................... 8 10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................. 24 2.8 PHASING/SCALABILITY ..................................................................................................... 9 2.8.1 Snow Removal and Salt Spreading .............................................................................................. 9 10.1 CONFIRMED FINDINGS .................................................................................................... 24 2.8.2 Vibration ........................................................................................................................................ 9 10.1.1 Alignment Works With Some Modifications ........................................................................... 24 2.8.3 Streetcar Vehicle Breakdown ....................................................................................................... 9 10.1.2 Potential Sites Identified for a Vehicle Maintenance and Storage Facility ............................ 24 10.1.3 Bridges Appear Capable of Supporting Streetcars with Modifications .................................. 24 3.0 VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY/PROPULSION ........................................................................... 9 10.1.4 Streetcars are the Right Vehicle Technology ........................................................................ 24 10.1.5 Concept of Operations Simplified With Elimination of Downtown Brooklyn Shuttle .............. 25 3.1 VEHICLE REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................. 9 10.1.6 Operating & Maintenance Cost Estimates and Plan are Reasonable ................................... 25 3.2 STREETCARS VERSUS LRVS ...........................................................................................10 10.1.7 Ridership Forecast Appears Reasonable .............................................................................. 25 3.3 OFF-WIRE OPERATION ....................................................................................................10 10.1.8 Potential to “Self-Finance” Through
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CASE STUDY Vehicle Platform from Pilot to Priority: Faster Bus Service in New York City
    ConnectedCASE STUDY Vehicle Platform From pilot to priority: Faster bus service in New York City A pioneering collaboration between the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) and Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has led to the implementation of an Opticom Transit Signal Priority (TSP) throughout some of New York City’s busiest roadways, helping to Solution Overview address the issue of slow bus journeys caused by major traffic congestion. PROBLEM The innovative approach leveraged existing Traditionally, TSP involves Bus travel times slow, and getting slower vehicle and citywide infrastructure, allowing • Route M15-SBS: 2nd highest purpose-built hardware on the the efficient rollout of TSP across nearly passenger loads in city 6,000 buses and 12,700 intersections1 vehicle and at the intersection. • Congested, intermodal route in New York City. It will also allow the MTA But for the New York, the sheer - Heavy pedestrian, bicycle traffic to easily deploy updates and upgrades as - Unloading trucks volume of intersections and technology improves, providing access vehicles that needed to be to new features and refinements without • Cross traffic coordination required • Urban canyon reduced GPS equipped would have taken requiring costly and time-consuming hardware maintenance. effectiveness years to install. The decision • 13,000 traffic signals -- difficult to to test and then implement a As a result, New York City bus riders should deploy hardware see improved travel times and more reliable centralized, software-based service as they use the country’s largest SOLUTION TSP solution was critical to a bus network. Deliver centralized transit signal priority successful deployment. control • Leverage existing infrastructure, Moving Millions of People in a Megacity investments New York City has the largest transit ridership in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Newsletter
    Property Newsletter Properties available for bidding 22/09/21 to 27/09/21 Property Reference: 4251 Property Reference: 42510 Property Reference: 42511 Landlord: Sandwell MBC Landlord: Sandwell MBC Landlord: Sandwell MBC Type: 2 Bed Ground Floor Flat High Rise Type: 1 Bed Bungalow Semi Detached Type: 1 Bed Ground Floor Flat Low Rise Address: Aldridge Road Oldbury Address: Conway Avenue Millfields West Address: Crown Walk Tipton West Midlands Bromwich Rent: £79.78 Rent: £70.52 Rent: £84.01 EPC Asset Rating - Band Awaiting EPC EPC Asset Rating - Band C EPC Asset Rating - Band Awaiting EPC Council Tax Banding - Band Unavailable Council Tax Banding - Band Unavailable Council Tax Banding - Band Unavailable Minimum Age: 40+ Minimum Age: 40+ Minimum Age: 55+ Eligible profiles: Couple; Single Person Eligible profiles: Couple; Single Person Eligible profiles: Couple; Single Person Description: B68 0HB. LAWRENCE COURT. Description: DY4 7SY. CROWN WALK. Located Located in the Brandhall area of Oldbury. No Child Description: B71 2PB. Located in the Millfields in the Burnt Tree area of Tipton. PROPERTY HAS Block.All Occupants must be aged 40+ No Dogs area of West Bromwich. Property has a Wet A LEVEL ACCESS SHOWER. Applicants must Allowed. Property has Step up Shower. Room. 2x steps to front door and a 6 inch step to have a recognised need for the adaptations in the rear. Preference will be given to applicants who property.MAY BECOME AVAILABLE.All have a recognised meduical need or priority for GF occupants must be aged 40+ accommodation. Property Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • Dekalb Avenue Traffic Calming and Bicycle Lane Project
    DeKalb Avenue Traffic Calming and Bicycle Lane Project NYC Department of Transportation Presentation to Brooklyn Office of Alternate Modes Community Boards 2 & 3 March 2008 Why are we here? • Bicycle Fatality & Serious Injury Study – Improve Safety • Mayor’s PlaNYC – A Greener Transportation Network • 1997 Bicycle Master Plan NYC DOT Bicycle Program • 200 Mile, 3 Year Bicycle Route Commitment • Targeting Areas of High Demand & Key Connections • Design Approach: 1. Study Best Practices 2. Develop Innovative Designs for Constrained NYC Environment 3. “Complete Streets” Design Philosophy Neighborhood-Wide Bicycle Network Implementation Timeline Tompkins & Throop Aves 1997, 2003 DeKalb Ave (west of Cumberland) 2004 Willoughby Ave April 2007 Carlton Ave & Cumberland St May 2007 Central & Evergreen Aves (Bushwick) June 2007 Bedford Ave October 2007 DeKalb Ave (2.6 miles) May 2008 Franklin Ave August 2008 Commuter Corridor • Bus Commutes to Downtown Brooklyn & Subway • DeKalb is a Key Bus Route – 9th busiest in Brooklyn, 23rd busiest in NYC • B38 running at or near capacity – 2.6% increase in ridership from 2005-2006 (compared to .6% increase in Brooklyn and citywide) Bicycle Demand 12-hour* Bicycle Counts on DeKalb and Willoughby Avenues Cross-street Cross-street Street Cyclists** 1 2 Willoughby Tompkins (97) Marcy Ave Ave Ave 250 Willoughby (163) Clermont Ave Adelphi St Ave 410 Tompkins (138) DeKalb Ave Marcy Ave Ave 350 (132) DeKalb Ave Bedford Ave Skillman St 330 Washington (97) DeKalb Ave Hall St Ave 250 (263) DeKalb Ave Clermont Ave Adelphi
    [Show full text]
  • Fixing the L Train and Managing the Shutdown a Community Consensus Proposal
    Fixing the L Train and Managing the Shutdown A Community Consensus Proposal November 2016 Contents Executive Summary / 3 Summary of Recommendations / 3 Introduction / 6 Impact on Commuters and Residents / 8 Implications/how to prepare for the shutdown / 10 Impact on Businesses / 11 How much do local businesses depend on the L train? / 11 How to prepare for the shutdown / 11 Providing the Best Travel Alternatives / 12 Prepare adjacent subway lines for higher ridership / 12 New rapid bus services with dedicated preferential treatments and auto-free zones / 13 Transform streets in Brooklyn to better connect people and cyclists to transit / 17 Improve ferry service and reduce fares to serve Williamsburg residents / 18 Making the Most of the Shutdown: Transforming the L Train / 19 Capital improvements at five stations / 20 Timing and funding / 20 Procurement and design / 21 An Inclusive Process / 22 Community Profiles /23 Manhattan / 24 Williamsburg/Greenpoint / 25 Bushwick/Ridgewood / 26 East New York/Brownsville/Canarsie / 27 2 Fixing the L Train and Managing the Shutdown: A Community Consensus Proposal | November 2016 Executive Summary The Metropolitan Transportation Authority has said it will shut ⊲ State Senator Martin M. Dilan down the L train tunnels under the East River for more than a ⊲ Council Member Stephen Levin year to repair the severe damage caused by Superstorm Sandy. ⊲ Council Member Antonio Reynoso That is grim news for the hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers ⊲ Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer who rely on the L and who will have few easy alternatives to get ⊲ Brooklyn Borrough President Eric L. Adams to where they’re going every day.
    [Show full text]
  • Frommer's Seattle 2004
    01 541277 FM.qxd 11/17/03 9:37 AM Page i Seattle 2004 by Karl Samson Here’s what the critics say about Frommer’s: “Amazingly easy to use. Very portable, very complete.” —Booklist “Detailed, accurate, and easy-to-read information for all price ranges.” —Glamour Magazine “Hotel information is close to encyclopedic.” —Des Moines Sunday Register “Frommer’s Guides have a way of giving you a real feel for a place.” —Knight Ridder Newspapers 01 541277 FM.qxd 11/17/03 9:37 AM Page ii About the Author Karl Samson makes his home in the Northwest. He also covers the rest of Wash- ington for Frommer’s. In addition, Karl is the author of Frommer’s Arizona. Published by: Wiley Publishing, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5744 Copyright © 2004 Wiley Publishing, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval sys- tem or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978/750-8400, fax 978/646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for per- mission should be addressed to the Legal Department, Wiley Publishing, Inc., 10475 Crosspoint Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46256, 317/572-3447, fax 317/572-4447, E-Mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Transit and Bus Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20Th Floor Conference Room New York, NY 10004 Monday, 6/24/2019 10:30 AM - 12:00 PM ET
    Transit and Bus Committee Meeting June 2019 NYCT President Andy Byford joined Transit Veterans at the WWII Memorial located in the lobby of New York City Transit’s Downtown Brooklyn headquarters on June 6 to commemorate the 75th anniversary of D-Day. Three Transit employees made the ultimate sacrifice for their country in the ensuing Normandy campaign that began in June 1944. New York City Transit and Bus Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Conference Room New York, NY 10004 Monday, 6/24/2019 10:30 AM - 12:00 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MAY 20, 2019 Meeting Minutes - Page 4 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN Work Plan - Page 15 4. PRESIDENT'S REPORT a. Customer Service Report i. President's Commentary President's Commentary - Page 23 ii. Subway Report Subway Report - Page 26 iii. NYCT, MTA Bus Report NYCT, MTA Bus Report - Page 57 iv. Paratransit Report Paratransit Report - Page 81 v. Accessibility Update Accessibility Update - Page 95 vi. Strategy & Customer Experience Strategy & Customer Experience - Page 97 b. Safety Report Safety Report - Page 103 c. Crime Report Crime Report - Page 107 d. NYCT, SIR, MTA Bus Financial & Ridership Reports NYCT, SIR, MTA Bus Financial and Ridership Reports - Page 118 e. Capital Program Status Report Capital Program Status Report - Page 169 5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS (No Materials) a. Fast Forward - One Year Update b. L Project Update- JMT Consulting 6. PROCUREMENTS Procurement Cover, Staff Summary, Resolution - Page 179 a. Non-Competitive NYCT Non-Competitive Actions - Page 184 b. Competitive NYCT Competitive Actions - Page 186 c. Ratifications NYCT Ratifications - Page 191 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Too Cool—Families Catch the Cool!
    2010 SPRING Cool Culture® provides 50,000 underserved families with free, unlimited sponsored by JAQUELINE KENNEDY access to ONASSIS 90 cultural institutionsRESEVOIR - so that parents can provide their children withCENTRAL PARK 80 Hanson Place, Suite 604, Brooklyn, NY 11217 www.coolculture.org educational experiences that will help them succeed in school and life. CENTRAL PARK HARLEM MEER Malky, Simcha, Stanley and Avi Mayerfeld. Fi e tzpa t trick t . Vaness e a Griffi v th and Ys Y abe l Fitzpat FIFTH AVENUE d rick. n a o FIFTH AVENUE i g r e S , a n i t n e g r A Isabella, Sophia and Ethel Zaldaña 108TH ST 107TH ST 106TH ST 103RD ST 105TH ST 102ND ST 104TH ST 101ST ST 100TH ST 99TH ST 98TH ST 97TH ST 96TH ST 95TH ST 94TH ST 93RD ST 92ND ST 91ST ST 90TH ST 89TH ST 88TH ST 87TH ST 86TH ST 85TH ST 84TH ST 83RD ST 82ND ST 81ST ST Felicia and Omaria Williams F e l ic ia a nd he t C C O o o m o a h ri W o To ol— illiams atc l! Families C The Cool Culture community couldn't choose just one. “I really liked came together to Catch the Cool on making stuff and meeting my friend and June 8th at the Museum Mile getting a poster by (artist) Michael Albert,” she said. The siblings – along with Festival! Thousands painted, drew, their sister Ysabel (one), mom Yvette and aunt danced and partied on Fifth Avenue from Vanessa Griffith– participated in art activities 105th Street to 82nd Street, dropping in that included crafting monkey ears at The museums along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Policy Options Brief To: Councilman Ydanis A
    Policy Options Brief To: Councilman Ydanis A. Rodriguez, Chairperson of the New York City Council Committee on Transportation; Daryl C. Irick, Acting President of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority From: Kyle Rectenwald and Paul Evans Subject: Detrimental Effects of Limited Transport Access on Low-Income New Yorkers Date: March 23, 2017 Problem: The New Yorkers Who Need Access to Transit the Most Have it the Least New York City’s low-income communities are being severely underserved by the city’s public transportation system. Around 58% of the city’s poorest residents, more than any other income group, rely on the subway and bus systems for transportation (Bendix). Yet for a variety of reasons to be outlined, these residents are being increasingly isolated from access to transit and presented with limited mobility options. Marginalization from the city’s transport network means limited access to the opportunities provided by a vibrant city like New York. This inequitable situation has real, detrimental effects on people’s lives. For one young man, simply getting from his home in West Harlem to attend college in the Bronx requires an hour or more walk every day (Stolper and Rankin 4). For many residents, lack of transport means they are unable to even pick children up from childcare, go grocery shopping, or access basic, fundamental services like hospitals and schools. For the city’s low-income population, limited access to transport is a key factor locking them into a spiral of poverty. As Councilmember David Greenfield recently said, “You can’t get out of poverty if you can’t get to your job” (Foley).
    [Show full text]
  • October 5, 2016 Veronique Hakim President, New York City Transit
    UNITED STATES HOUSE THE NEW YORK THE NEW YORK THE COUNCIL OF THE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATE SENATE STATE ASSEMBLY CITY OF NEW YORK October 5, 2016 Veronique Hakim President, New York City Transit Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2 Broadway New York, NY 1004 Dear President Hakim, Please restore the M15 Select Bus Service at 72nd Street. The M15 Limited stopped at 72nd Street until it was phased out in favor of M15 Select Bus Service. With high bus-dependent populations, infrequent local service, crosstown bus service, hospitals, community support and opening of the Second Avenue Subway with a station at 72nd Street, now is the perfect opportunity to increase ridership by restoring M15 Select Bus Service at 72nd Street. 72nd Street Only Location Omitted from Select Bus Service When Select Bus Service was introduced to First and Second Avenues on the M15 route, Select Bus Stations replaced Limited Service stops in every location above Houston Street other than East 72nd Street. Since October 2010, residents living in the East 72nd Street area, for example at 73rd off York Avenue, now must choose between walking three avenues and six blocks, more than half a mile, to a Select Bus Service bus station at 67th or 79th Streets and Second Avenue, versus half that distance to 72nd Street. Walking more than half a mile in both directions is simply too far for many residents. High Concentration of Seniors and Children Need Select Bus Service at 72nd Street The neighborhood that would be served by a Select Bus Service station at 72nd Street includes Census Tracts in Manhattan number 124, 126, 132, and 134 spanning from 69th to 79th between 3rd Avenue and the East River with a population of 44,756, one of the highest near any Select Bus station: 8,679 or 32.7% of households include children (under 18) or seniors (65 and over) who may rely on bus service due to age: o 3,326 or 12.5% of households have children under 18 years-old.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Bus Service in New York a Thesis Presented to The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons Improving Bus Service in New York A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment Of the requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning By Charles Romanow May 2018 Abstract New York City’s transportation system is in a state of disarray. City street are clogged with taxi’s and for-hire vehicles, subway platforms are packed with straphangers waiting for delayed trains and buses barely travel faster than pedestrians. The bureaucracy of City and State government in the region causes piecemeal improvements which do not keep up with the state of disrepair. Bus service is particularly poor, moving at rates incomparable with the rest of the country. New York has recently made successful efforts at improving bus speeds, but only so much can be done amidst a city of gridlock. Bus systems around the world faced similar challenges and successfully implemented improvements. A toolbox of near-immediate and long- term options are at New York’s disposal dealing directly with bus service as well indirect causes of poor bus service. The failing subway system has prompted public discussion concerning bus service. A significant cause of poor service in New York is congestion. A number of measures are capable of improving congestion and consequently, bus service. Due to the city’s limited capacity at implementing short-term solutions, the most highly problematic routes should receive priority. Routes with slow speeds, high rates of bunching and high ridership are concentrated in Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn which also cater to the most subway riders.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfbidlovesbiz #STOPBYSHOPBUY
    NORTH FLATBUSH BID CONNECTING COMMUNITIES FOR OVER 30 YEARS Visit us at: NORTHFLATBUSHBID.NYC 282 Flatbush Avenue Brooklyn New York 11217 718-783-1685 · [email protected] Design by AGD Studio · www.agd.studio Stay connected with us: #NFBIDlovesBIZ #STOPBYSHOPBUY @NORTHFLATBUSHBK @NFBID NFBID: OUR BACKGROUND NFBID: DISTRICT MAP & BOARD MEMBERS N Take a further look: Scale of map: NFBID.COM/SHOP 1 in = 250 ft NORTH FLATBUSH BID Greetings! B45 B67 CLASS A: PROPERTY OWNERS A little over 35 years ago, a group of committed citizens joined BAM BAM ATLANTIC AVE & forces to improve the area known as North Flatbush Avenue. These 3RD AVENUE SHARP HARVEY BARCLAYS CENTER committed citizens, along with the assistance of elected officials B D N R Q WILLIAMSBURGH FULTON STREET President, Ms. Regina Cahill and city agencies, brought renewal to Flatbush Avenue beginning SAVINGS BANK with the “Triangle Parks Commission” and the North Flatbush Avenue TOWER Vice President, Mr. Michael Pintchik Betterment Committee that ultimately gave rise to the North Flatbush B37 Secretary & Treasurer, Ms. Diane Allison Business Improvement District (NFBID). This corridor along Flatbush B65 B45 ATLANTIC AVE & BARCLAYS CENTER Avenue from Atlantic Avenue towards Prospect Park connects NORTH B103 FLATBUSH 2 3 4 5 Mr. Abed Awad residential communities like Park Slope, Prospect Heights, Pacific Park BID B63 and bustling Downtown to the peaceful Prospect Park and beyond Mr. Scott Domansky 4TH AVENUE B41 with a slew of transportation links and the Avenue traveling from the B65 BARCLAYS Mr. Chris King Manhattan Bridge to the bay. B67 CENTER Mr. Matthew Pintchik Over the years, the members of the NFBID Board of Directors, BERGEN ST ATLANTIC AVENUE Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2: Main Report SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT – SESSION 2
    EDINBURGH TRAM NETWORK EDINBURGH TRAM (LINE TWO) BILL Environmental Statement: Volume 2: Main Report SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT – SESSION 2 PREFACE The Edinburgh Tram Line 2 Environmental Statement is published in five volumes: • Volume 1 Non-Technical Summary • Volume 2 Environmental Statement: Main Report • Volume 3 Figures • Volume 4 Appendices to Main Report • Volume 5 Protected Species Report (Confidential) This document is Volume 2. Table of Contents VOLUME 2 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: MAIN REPORT ABBREVIATIONS 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1-1 1.2 Tram Line 2 and the Tram Network 1-1 1.3 The Environmental Impact Assessment of Tram Line 2 1-1 1.4 The EIA Process 1-1 1.5 Relationship Between Tram Line 1 and Tram Line 2 1-2 1.6 Authors 1-2 1.7 Structure of ES 1-3 2 THE PROPOSED SCHEME 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 The Need for the Scheme 2-1 2.3 Scheme Alternatives 2-2 2.4 Scheme Description 2-4 2.5 Tram Line 2 Infrastructure 2-7 2.6 The Construction Phase 2-11 2.7 Operation of Tram Line 2 2-14 3 APPROACH TO THE EIA 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Parliamentary Requirements and the EIA Regulations 3-1 3.3 The EIA Process 3-1 3.4 Approach to the Assessment of Impacts 3-2 3.5 Uncertainty, Assumptions and Limitations 3-4 3.6 Scope of the Environmental Statement and Consultation 3-6 4 POLICY CONTEXT 4.1 Introduction 4-1 4.2 Methods 4-1 4.3 National and Regional Planning Guidance 4-3 4.4 Planning Policies of The Local Authority 4-6 4.5 Summary 4-13 5 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT 5.1 Introduction 5-1 5.2 Methods 5-1 5.3 Baseline Situation 5-4 5.4 Construction Effects
    [Show full text]