DOCSLIB.ORG

Chambly Canal 2018 National Historic Site of Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chambly Canal 2018 National Historic Site of Canada Management Plan Chambly Canal 2018 National Historic Site of Canada 2018 Chambly Canal National Historic Site of Canada Management Plan ii © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by The Chief Executive Officer, Parks Canada Agency, 2018 Parks Canada MANAGEMENT PLAN, CHAMBLY CANAL NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE OF CANADA, 2018 Paper: R64-105/9-2018E 978-0-660-24770-0 PDF: R64-105/9-2018E-PDF 978-0-660-24769-4 Cette publication est aussi disponible en français. For more information on the management plan or on the CHAMBLY CANAL NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE OF CANADA: Chambly Canal National Historic Site of Canada: 1899, boul. de Périgny Chambly, Quebec, J3L 4N3 Tel.: 450-658-0681 fax: 450-658-2428 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.pc.gc.ca/en/lhn-nhs/qc/chambly Sources of the images on the cover page At the top, from left to right: Parks Canada and Library and Archives Canada, C-060786 Below: Parks Canada Chambly Canal iii Management Plan Foreword Canada’s national parks, national historic sites and national marine conservation areas belong to all Canadians and offer truly Canadian experiences. These special places make up one of the finest and most extensive systems of protected natural and cultural heritage areas in the world. The Government is committed to preserving our natural and cultural heritage, expanding the system of protected places and contributing to the recovery of species-at-risk. At the same time, we must continue to offer new and innovative visitor and outreach programs and activities so that more Canadians can experience Parks Canada places and learn about our environment, history and culture. This new management plan for Chambly Canal National Historic Site of Canada supports this vision. Management plans are developed through extensive consultation and input from various people and organizations, including Indigenous Peoples, local and regional residents, visitors and the dedicated team at Parks Canada. National parks, national historic sites and national marine conservation areas are a priority for the Government of Canada. I would like to thank everyone who contributed to this plan for their commitment and spirit of co-operation. As the Minister responsible for Parks Canada, I applaud this collaborative effort and I am pleased to approve the Chambly Canal National Historic Site of Canada Management Plan. Catherine McKenna Minister of Environment and Climate Change and Minister responsible for Parks Canada Chambly Canal v Management Plan RECOMMENDATIONS Recommended by: ________________________________ Michael Nadler Acting Chief Executive Officer Parks Canada ________________________________ Trevor Swerdfager Senior Vice-President, Operations Parks Canada ________________________________ Lauren Small Director Quebec Waterways Unit Parks Canada Chambly Canal vii Management Plan Executive Summary Located in the heart of the Montérégie area on the South shore of Montreal, the Chambly Canal National Historic Site was designated to be of national historic significance in 1929. Opened to navigation in 1843, this engineering infrastructure not only allowed commercial barges to bypass the Richelieu River rapids, it also significantly contributed to the development and the economic growth of adjacent municipalities. Today, the commercial barges have been replaced by recreational boaters, and the old towpath has been converted into a multi-use path that attracts more than 250,000 visitors and cyclists annually, making the Chambly Canal an important recreational tourism destination. The diversity of the site's historic components, such as the locks, including some that are still operated manually, as well as the archaeological remains of Fort-Sainte-Thérèse, a distinct national historic site, contribute to the richness and the identity of the Chambly Canal National Historic Site, one of the five (5) historic canals managed by Parks Canada in Quebec. Since 2015, significant investments have been made to improve the condition of the infrastructure and buildings of the Chambly Canal and maintain its physical integrity. These investments, representing approximately $50 million, are scheduled to continue until 2020. This Management plan replaces the 2007 plan and introduces the proposed vision for the site for the next ten years. While a number of the 2007 plan’s objectives have been accomplished, including identifying the location of Fort-Sainte-Thérèse, others are in the process of being carried out, such as the completion of significant rehabilitation work on the canal infrastructure and the proposal of a management strategy for all non-functional heritage bridges. The vision for the Chambly Canal National Historic Site is to promote its heritage and landscape, improve the visitor experience and increase the community’s sense of ownership and pride in the site. The development of Fort-Sainte-Thérèse as a distinct attraction along the Chambly Canal is also part of the proposed vision. Three (3) key strategies support the vision for management of the site over the next 10 years: Strategy 1: The Chambly Canal: Preserve and enhance its heritage and its cultural and natural landscape The goal of this strategy is to protect and promote, for the benefit of current and future generations, the built heritage, the surrounding environment and the cultural and natural landscapes of the Chambly Canal. This strategy is intended to ensure that the condition of the site’s historical components and the effort dedicated to their preservation reflect the importance of this engineering work. Two objectives support this strategy: Objective 1.1: The condition and integrity of the Canal's historic infrastructure are improved; Objective 1.2: The centres, sectors, cultural and natural landscapes of the Chambly Canal are further recognized and showcased. viii Strategy 2: An improved and diversified visitor experience from one end of the canal to the other This strategy is intended to improve the services and activities offered in order to enhance the visitor and recreational boater experience along the Chambly Canal. The improvement of visitor experience will be supported by the communities surrounding the canal and will result in an enhanced distribution of services, experiences and activities, to better meet the expectations of different clienteles and users. The objectives are the following: Objective 2.1: The service offer is better adapted to the needs of visitors and recreational boaters and better distributed according to the travel routes and destination sites Objective 2.2: New development plans, carried out in partnership with the adjacent municipalities, contribute to improving the attractiveness of the Chambly Canal Objective 2.3: The renewal of programs and activities enhance visitor experience. Strategy 3: A source of pride and benefits for the community Community pride in the Chambly Canal will contribute to its appreciation, while increasing a sense of belonging and interest in contributing to the site. The implementation of a strategy focused on partnerships, agreements and business opportunities with partners will enhance the site’s performance in terms of visitor experience, increase visitor loyalty and generate a positive impact on the surrounding communities. The following objective supports this strategy: Objective 3.1: The importance of the Chambly Canal is reflected in the level of commitment and ownership of the site by the local community The management plan suggests a targeted management approach for the Fort-Sainte- Thérèse National Historic Site. The recent discovery of the location of the archaeological remains of Fort-Sainte-Thérèse, on Fryer Island, requires the establishment of management guidelines to ensure its conservation and development for years to come. With the untapped potential of Fort-Sainte- Thérèse, the following objectives are put forward: • Recognize and promote the national historic value of the site • Protect and enhance Fryer Island’s exceptional natural setting • Make Fort-Sainte-Thérèse National Historic Site noticeable and accessible along the course of the Chambly Canal • Commemorate the history of the site through new interpretive activities. Chambly Canal ix Management Plan Table of Contents Foreword ..............................................................................................iii Recommendations................................................................................ v Executive Summary .............................................................................vii 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................... 1 2.0 Significance of the Chambly Canal National Historic Site .............. 9 3.0 Planning Context ............................................................................ 9 4.0 Vision ............................................................................................ 10 5.0 Key Strategies .............................................................................. 11 6.0 Area management approach for the Fort-Sainte-Thérèse National Historic Site .................................................................... 13 7.0 Summary of the Strategic Environmental Assessment ................. 18 Maps Map 1: Regional Map ........................................................................... 2 Map 2: Chambly Canal National Historic Site ....................................... 3 Map 3: Location map of the Fort-Sainte-Thérèse National Historic Site ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dams and Reservoirs in the Lake Champlain Richelieu River Basin
    JUST THE FACTS SERIES June 2019 DAMS AND RESERVOIRS IN THE LAKE CHAMPLAIN RICHELIEU RIVER BASIN MYTH Water released from tributary dams in the United States causes flooding in Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River. FACT Water levels in Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River Generally, mass releases of water from flood control are primarily affected by precipitation from rain or dams are avoided. In addition to compromising the snowmelt. structural integrity of the dams, mass releases would also endanger the very communities that these dams are built Because of its size, Lake Champlain can store a lot of to protect. water; the flood control dams and reservoirs in the basin, which are very small in comparison to the lake, do not When conditions force the release of more water than significantly change water levels of the lake and river as hydropower plants can handle, the increase in water they release water. levels immediately below the dam will be much greater than the increase on Lake Champlain. This is true even during high water and flooding events. Consider, for instance, when Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River experienced extreme flooding between April and June 2011, the additional releases flowing from Waterbury Reservoir—the largest flood control reservoir in the Vermont portion of the basin, contributed less than 2 centimetres (¾ inch) to the elevation of Lake Champlain and the upper Richelieu River. International Lake Champlain-Richelieu River Study Board FACT FACT Dams in the US portion of the basin are built for one of Waterbury Reservoir in Vermont is the largest reservoir two purposes: flood control or hydroelectric power.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Deliveries and Cruising
    Great Lakes Deliveries and Cruising Captains Roy Adler & Ken Hawes OUTLINE •Background •Cruise Planning •Great Lakes Pathways •Special Items •Route Selection •Q & A •Delivery Planning Atlantic Access Approximately 250 statute Miles to St. Lawrence Seaway Champlain Canal Lake Champlain Richelieu River Chambly Canal Great Lake Distances (in statute miles) Great Lake Length Width Lake Ontario 192 53 Lake Erie 240 38 - 57 Lake Huron 206 183* Lake Michigan 307 118 Lake Superior 350 160 *widest point HUDSON RIVERText ACCESS statute height Canal locks days miles restrictions Erie 363 57 15.5’ 5 Erie - 204 30 21’ 3 Oswego Champlain 64 12 15.5’-17’ 1 Chambly 12 9 29’ <1 Welland 27 8 N/A <1 to 2 Trent - 239 44 22’ 5 Severn ATLANTIC OCEAN ACCESS height Waterway statute miles locks restrictions Canso Strait 17 1 N/A St. Lawrence 2500 15 N/A Seaway* * Gulf of St.Lawrence to Lake Erie ANNAPOLIS TO CHICAGO Routes Approximate Statute Miles Erie Canal 1700 Erie -Oswego - Welland Canals 1700 Erie-Oswego-Trent-Severn 1600 Canals Champlain - Chambly - St. 2200 Lawrence -Welland Canals Champlain - Chambly - St. 2100 Lawrence -Trent-Severn Canso Strait - Welland 3900 Canso Strait - Trent-Severn 3800 ROUTE SELECTION Yacht Height Owners Requirements Weather Forecast Fuel Range Lock Crew Requirements Yacht Length and Weight CHICAGO DELIVERY PLANNING 52’ Carver Voyager’ Fuel Tank -- 800 gallons Cruise Burn Rate -- 50 gal./hour Cruise speed -- 25 knots Distance -- 1700 miles Boat Height -- 20’ *Plan Days -- 9 * assumes perfect weather ERIE CANAL ENT ERIE CANAL TOLL BUILDING ERIE CANAL TYPICAL LOCK ERIE CANAL Fender Arrangement ERIE CANAL REMOTE SECTION ERIE CANAL SCHENECTADY YACHT CLUB ERIE CANAL OLD BARGE ERIE CANAL ILION MARINA ERIE CANAL TYPICAL LINE WITH WEIGHTS LAKE ONEIDA BRIDGE ON WESTERN SIDE OSWEGO CANAL MOVING INTO OSWEGO, NY OSWEGO MARINA LAKE ONTARIO LAKE ONTARIO LEAVING OSWEGO, NY ST.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mapping of Samuel De Champlain, 1603–1635 Conrad E
    51 • The Mapping of Samuel de Champlain, 1603–1635 Conrad E. Heidenreich The cartography of Samuel de Champlain marks the be- roster of 1595 he was listed as a fourier (sergeant) and aide ginning of the detailed mapping of the Atlantic coast north to the maréchal de logis (quartermaster), apparently of Nantucket Sound, into the St. Lawrence River valley, reaching the rank of maréchal himself.4 The same pay ros- and, in a more cursory fashion, to the eastern Great Lakes. ter states that in 1595 he went on a secret mission for the Previous maps were based on rapid ship-board reconnais- king that was regarded to be of some importance. He also sance surveys made in the early to middle sixteenth cen- made a “special report” to Henri IV after his West Indian tury, particularly on the expeditions of Jacques Cartier and voyage (1601) and after the first two voyages to Canada Jean-François de La Rocque, sieur de Roberval (1534 – (1603 and 1607). These reports seem to indicate that 43). These maps conveyed little more than the presence of Champlain had a personal relationship with Henri IV, a stylized coastline. The immediate result of the Cartier- probably accounting for the pension the king awarded him Roberval expeditions was that France lost interest in sometime before 1603.5 After the war, Champlain joined North America, except for fishing off the northeast coast. his uncle’s ship, the 500-tun Saint-Julien, in Spanish The indigenous population was considered impoverished Caribbean service.6 In June 1601, Champlain was in and hostile, there were no quick riches, and the winters Cádiz where he was a witness to his dying uncle’s testa- were so brutal that the French wondered whether Euro- ment leaving him a large estate near La Rochelle as well as peans could live there.
    [Show full text]
  • Fur Trade in New France
    THE FUR TRADE IN NEW FRANCE * Descriptions From frontispiece of Lahontan, New Voyages to North-America, 1703 1685, 1697 “these Merchants have a more beneficial Trade than a great many other Tradesmen in the World” Fur Trading with the Indians at Fort Chambly near Montreal 1685 In Louis Armand de Lom d'Arce, Baron de Lahontan, Nouveaux voyages dans l'Amérique septentrionale (New Voyages to North-America), 1703 [The Ottawas and Hurons] come down every Year to the Colony in order to make a better Market than they can do in their own Country of Michilimackinac, which lies on the Banks of the Lake of Hurons, at the Mouth of the Lake of the Illinese [Lake Michigan]. Their way of Trading is as follows: Upon their first Arrival, they encamp at the distance of five or six hundred Paces from the Town. The next day is spent in [ar]ranging their Canoes, unloading their Goods and pitching their Tents, which are made of Birch Bark. The next day after, they demand Audience of the Governor General, which is granted ’em that same day in a public place. Upon this Occasion, each Nation makes a Ring for itself; the Savages sit upon the Ground with their Pipes in their Mouths, and the Governor is seated in an armed Chair; after which, there starts up an Orator or Speaker from one of these Nations, who makes an Harangue, importing, “That his ‘Brethren are come to visit the Governor general, and to renew with him their wonted Friendship: That their chief View is to promote the Interest of the French, some of whom being unacquainted with the way of Traffic,
    [Show full text]
  • Annex VIII Casestudy0304 Ch
    IEA Hydropower Implementing Agreement Annex VIII Hydropower Good Practices: Environmental Mitigation Measures and Benefits Case study 03-04: Fish Migration and River Navigation - Chambly Dam, Canada Key Issues: 3- Fish Migration and River Navigation Climate Zone: Cf: Temperate Subjects: - Fishway Effects: - Allow upstream migration of juvenile American eel ( Anguilla rostrata ) Project Name: Chambly Dam Country: Canada Implementing Party & Period - Project: Hydro-Québec 1965 - Good Practice: Hydro-Québec 1997 Key Words: American eel, ladder, fish migration, Chambly Dam Abstract: For 150 years, the Richelieu River (Québec, Canada) supported a sizable commercial silver American eel fishery. A sharp and constant decline of annual landings since 1981 has been at least partly related to the rebuilding, in 1965, of an old cribwork. In 1997, a ladder was retrofitted on the 270-m Chambly Dam to allow eel migration and enhance recruitment. 1. Outline of the Project Chambly Dam is located on the Richelieu River, a tributary of the St. Lawrence near Montréal (Québec, Canada). It is a 270-m-long concrete overflow weir and the water head is approximately 5 m. It was built in 1965 to replace an old cribwork dam that was constructed in 1896. 2. Features of the Project Area The Richelieu River drains Lake Champlain, a large lake bordering New York and Vermont states (USA) and extending into Québec. Lake Champlain is connected to the Hudson River and to the Great Lakes by a network of locks and canals. The Richelieu River extends for 115 km between Lake Champlain and the St. Lawrence River. Figure 1 Location Map of the project From June to September, the average discharge is 271 m3/s (1937-1996) or about 3.5% of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 Major Drainage Basins
    HUC 8 HYDROLOGIC UNIT NAME CLINTON 04120101 Chautauqua-Conneaut FRANKLIN 04150409 CHAMPLAIN MASSENA FORT COVINGTON MOOERS ST LAWRENCE CLINTON 04120102 Cattaraugus BOMBAY WESTVILLE CONSTABLE CHATEAUGAY NYS Counties & BURKE LOUISVILLE 04120103 Buffalo-Eighteenmile BRASHER 04150308 CHAZY ALTONA ELLENBURG BANGOR WADDINGTON NORFOLK MOIRA 04120104 Niagara ESSEX MALONE DEC Regions JEFFERSON 6 04150307 BEEKMANTOWN MADRID 05010001 Upper Allegheny LAWRENCE BELLMONT STOCKHOLM DANNEMORA BRANDON DICKINSON PLATTSBURGH LEWIS OGDENSBURG CITY LISBON 05010002 Conewango 5 PLATTSBURGH CITY HAMILTON POTSDAM SCHUYLER FALLS SARANAC 05010004 French WARREN OSWEGATCHIE DUANE OSWEGO 04150306 PERU 04130001 Oak Orchard-Twelvemile CANTON PARISHVILLE ORLEANS WASHINGTON NIAGARA DE PEYSTER ONEIDA MORRISTOWN HOPKINTON WAVERLY PIERREPONT FRANKLIN 04140101 Irondequoit-Ninemile AUSABLE MONROE WAYNE BLACK BROOK FULTON SARATOGA DEKALB HERKIMER BRIGHTON GENESEE SANTA CLARA CHESTERFIELD 04140102 Salmon-Sandy ONONDAGA NYS Major 04150406 MACOMB 04150304 HAMMOND ONTARIO MADISON MONTGOMERY RUSSELL 04150102 Chaumont-Perch ERIE SENECA CAYUGA SCHENECTADY HERMON WILLSBORO ST ARMAND WILMINGTON JAY WYOMING GOUVERNEUR RENSSELAER ALEXANDRIA CLARE LIVINGSTON YATES 04130002 Upper Genesee OTSEGO ROSSIE COLTON CORTLAND ALBANY ORLEANS 04150301 04150404 SCHOHARIE ALEXANDRIA LEWIS 7 EDWARDS 04150408 CHENANGO FOWLER ESSEX 04130003 Lower Genesee 8 TOMPKINS CLAYTON SCHUYLER 9 4 THERESA 04150302 TUPPER LAKE HARRIETSTOWN NORTH ELBA CHAUTAUQUA CATTARAUGUS PIERCEFIELD 02050104 Tioga ALLEGANY STEUBEN
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown and Waterfront Revitalization Plan I V
    Downtown & Waterfront Revitalization Plan for the Village of Rouses Point Prepared for: Village of Rouses Point Clinton County, New York Submittal Date: June 22, 2006 Prepared by: This document was prepared for the Village of Rouses Point with funds provided by the New York State Department of State Division of Coastal Resources under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund Act. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................1 II. DOWNTOWN AND WATERFRONT VISION.............................................................5 A. THE FUTURE OF DOWNTOWN ROUSES POINT........................................................ 5 B. THE PUBLIC VISION PROCESS..................................................................................... 6 C. VISION FOR DOWNTOWN ROUSES POINT................................................................ 8 D. COMMON THEMES/GUIDING PRINCIPLES............................................................... 8 III. DOWNTOWN AND WATERFRONT PROFILE .........................................................9 A. VILLAGE SETTING.......................................................................................................... 9 B. STUDY AREA PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT .................................................................. 10 C. EXISTING MARKET CONDITIONS............................................................................. 13 1. Retail Trade Area.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Waters of Vermont
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 424 SURFACE WATERS OF VERMONT BY C. H. PIERCE Prepared in cooperation with the STATE OF VERMONT WASHINGTON GOVEENMENT PBINTING OFFICE 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BK PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 25 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation................................................................ 8 Division of work.......................................................... 8 Definition of terms......................................................... 9 Explanation of data........................................................ 9 Accuracy of field data and computed results................................ 11 Gaging stations maintained in Vermont..................................... 12 St. Lawrence River basin................................................. 13 Lake Champlain drainage basin......................................... 13 General features................................................... 13 Gaging-station records.............................................. 14 Lake Champlain at Burlington, Vt.............................. 14 Lake Champlain outlet (Richelieu River) at Chambly, Province of Quebec.1................................................. 20 Poultney Eiver near Fair Haven, Vt............................ 25 Otter Creek at Middlebury,
    [Show full text]
  • Art Militaire Et Technique De Guerre : Le Fort De Chambly De 1710-1711 Marc Lafrance
    Document généré le 2 oct. 2021 10:58 Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique française Art militaire et technique de guerre : le fort de Chambly de 1710-1711 Marc Lafrance Volume 37, numéro 1, juin 1983 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/304123ar DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/304123ar Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) Institut d'histoire de l'Amérique française ISSN 0035-2357 (imprimé) 1492-1383 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Lafrance, M. (1983). Art militaire et technique de guerre : le fort de Chambly de 1710-1711. Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique française, 37(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.7202/304123ar Tous droits réservés © Institut d'histoire de l'Amérique française, 1983 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ ART MILITAIRE ET TECHNIQUE DE GUERRE: LE FORT DE CHAMBLY DE 1710-1711 MARC LAFRANCE Parcs Canada, Québec Introduction* En moins de cinquante ans, le fort de Chambly, considéré en 1712 comme «le rempart du Canada du costé d'en haut», devient, à l'époque de la guerre de Sept Ans, «un mauvais fort», une «misérable bicoque»1.
    [Show full text]
  • Montréal-Est 40 15 Saint-Hyacinthe 640 138 440 25 223 Sainte-Julie 20 344 229 40 Boucherville Beloeil
    Western New England Greenway Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area & Champlain Valley National Heritage Partnership Long Island Sound to Montreal Quebec - Route Map 6 of 6: North Hero, Vermont to Montreal, Quebec National Park Service/U.S. Department of the Interior rom North Hero, VT to Montreal it is flat so it is F the wind to be aware of not the hills. A short 10 mile loop around Isle La Motte will take you past Quebec City quarries with the oldest known fossils in the world and the site of Samuel de Champlain’s landing in QUEBEC 40 173 Vermont. Have your passport ready when you get to 20 the border follow the directions to meet Route Verte Montreal 55 in Lacoile, QC. Halfway to St. Jean sur Richelieu are 201 10 Sherbrooke signs Route de Forts which will lead you Ft. Lennox. 15 St. Jean sur Richelieu A short boat ride to the island fort is both fun and 89 ME educational. In St. Jean sur Richelieu the bike path 91 Burlington along the Chambly Canal starts at Pont Gouin and Augusta Montpelier 95 ends near Ft. Chambly. 87 VT 93 Portland Chambly to Montreal becomes more urban the farther 89 NH you go but it is all on bike paths or bike lanes. Once NY Concord you enter the Montreal area you are in a complex with Manchester hundreds of miles of bike paths and lanes and unless Albany 91 93 90 it’s race time you can ride the Formula One track. MA 90 Boston Springeld Providence Hartford RI 87 CT 95 84 New York City Western New England Greenway Section 6: North Hero, Vermont to Montreal, Quebec Cue Sheet VT 211.7 NORTH HERO - Continue on Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Chambly 2018 National Historic Site of Canada Ii
    Management Plan Fort Chambly 2018 National Historic Site of Canada ii © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada, 2018. FORT CHAMBLY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE OF CANADA MANAGEMENT PLAN, 2018. Paper: R64-105/53-2018E 978-0-660-27924-4 PDF: R64-105/53-2018E-PDF 978-0-660-27923-7 Cette publication est aussi disponible en français. For more information about the management plan or about FORT CHAMBLY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE: 2 De Richelieu Street, Chambly, Quebec, Canada J3L 2B9 Tel: 450-658-1585, fax: 450-658-7216 Email: [email protected] http://www.pc.gc.ca/fortchambly Front cover image credits top from left to right: Parks Canada bottom: Parks Canada Fort Chambly National Historic Site iii Management Plan Foreword Canada’s national parks, national historic sites and national marine conservation areas belong to all Canadians and offer truly Canadian experiences. These special places make up one of the finest and most extensive systems of protected natural and cultural heritage areas in the world. The Government is committed to preserving our natural and cultural heritage, expanding the system of protected places and contributing to the recovery of species-at-risk. At the same time, we must continue to offer new and innovative visitor and outreach programs and activities so that more Canadians can experience Parks Canada places and learn about our environment, history and culture. This new management plan for Fort Chambly National Historic Site of Canada supports this vision. Management plans are developed through extensive consultation and input from various people and organizations, including Indigenous peoples, local and regional residents, visitors and the dedicated team at Parks Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitation of Federal Wharf Chambly Canal National Historic Site
    Équipe Service Client du Patrimoine 3, Passage du Chien-d’Or Québec (Québec) G1R 3Z8 Project: R.077244.00 Rehabilitation of Federal Wharf Chambly Canal National Historic Site Subject: ADDENDUM #1 June 6, 2018 Part 1 Addendum #1 –Responses to questions; precisions or general: .1 QRT-09: Removable Plant Box Item: We see a quantity of 2 planting bins in the plan. The quantity of hardware is indicated as 40 + 20 additional anchors (4 hardware kits are required for the attachment of the plant box).What is the exact amount of plant boxes for the project? Response: The quantities have been adjusted on the sheet C27 attached to this addendum. .2 QRT-11: Are there expansion joints provided in the coping wall? If so, what is their location and detail? Response: The details have been added to the plans attached to this addendum. .3 QRT-13: For the payment measure of 3,000 m² of sheet piles, you say that it will be measured after cutting-off, therefore excluding the 300 mm minimum cut-off strip. On the other hand, in the next sentence, you say that you will pay us only 300 mm of cut-off. The question is as follows: Should we consider an additional quantity of square metres to 3,000 m² to cover the cut-off strip or if the allowance for the cut-off strip is included in the 3,000 m²? Response: The quantities must include the cut-off strip. However, a maximum of 300 mm of cut- off is payable in the payment schedule, all as indicated in section 01 29 00.
    [Show full text]