DOCSLIB.ORG

The Last Great American.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Last Great American.Pdf For many lovers of film, American cinema of the late 1960s and early 1970s – dubbed the New Hollywood – has remained a Golden Age. HOR PICTURE SHOW ELSAESSER, AMERICAN GREAT THE LAST As the old studio system gave way to a new gen- FILMFILM FFILMILM eration of American auteurs, directors such as Monte Hellman, Peter Bogdanovich, Bob Rafel- CULTURE CULTURE son, Martin Scorsese, but also Robert Altman, IN TRANSITION IN TRANSITION James Toback, Terrence Malick and Barbara Loden helped create an independent cinema that gave America a different voice in the world and a dif- ferent vision to itself. The protests against the Vietnam War, the Civil Rights movement and feminism saw the emergence of an entirely dif- ferent political culture, reflected in movies that may not always have been successful with the mass public, but were soon recognized as audacious, creative and off-beat by the critics. Many of the films TheThe have subsequently become classics. The Last Great Picture Show brings together essays by scholars and writers who chart the changing evaluations of this American cinema of the 1970s, some- LaLastst Great Great times referred to as the decade of the lost generation, but now more and more also recognised as the first of several ‘New Hollywoods’, without which the cin- American ema of Francis Coppola, Steven Spiel- American berg, Robert Zemeckis, Tim Burton or Quentin Tarantino could not have come into being. Picture WATH AND KING WATH Picture NEWNEW HOLLYWOODHOLLYWOOD ISBN 90-5356-631-7 CINEMACINEMA ININ ShowShow EDITEDEDITED BY BY THETHE 1970S1970S THOMASTHOMAS ELSAESSER ELSAESSER ALEXANDERALEXANDER HORWATH HORWATH 9 789053 566317 NOELNOEL KING KING Amsterdam University Press AmsterdamAmsterdam UniversityUniversity PressPress WWW.AUP.NL The Last Great American Picture Show The Last Great American Picture Show New Hollywood Cinema in the 1970s edited by Thomas Elsaesser, Alexander Horwath and Noel King Amsterdam University Press Front and back cover illustration: Faye Dunaway in Bonnie and Clyde (1967, Arthur Penn) Cover design: Kok Korpershoek, Amsterdam Lay-out: japes, Amsterdam isbn 90 5356 493 4 (hardcover) isbn 90 5356 631 7 (paperback) nur 674 © Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2004 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, me- chanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permis- sion of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Table of Contents 5 Table of Contents Part One Introductions The Impure Cinema: New Hollywood 1967-1976 9 Alexander Horwath ”The Last Good Time We Ever Had”: Remembering the New Hollywood Cinema 19 Noel King American Auteur Cinema: The Last – or First – Great Picture Show 37 Thomas Elsaesser Part Two Histories The Decade When Movies Mattered 73 David Thomson A Walking Contradiction (Partly Truth and Partly Fiction) 83 Alexander Horwath The Exploitation Generation. or: How Marginal Movies Came in from the Cold 107 Maitland McDonagh New Hollywood and the Sixties Melting Pot 131 Jonathan Rosenbaum Part Three People and Places Dinosaurs in the Age of the Cinemobile 155 Richard T. Jameson ”The Cylinders Were Whispering My Name”: The Films of Monte Hellman 165 Kent Jones 6 The Last Great American Picture Show Nashville contra Jaws, or “The Imagination of Disaster” Revisited 195 J. Hoberman For Wanda 223 Bérénice Reynaud Everybody Knows This Is Nowhere: The Uneasy Ride of Hollywood and Rock 249 Howard Hampton Auteurism and War-teurism: Terrence Malick’s War Movie 267 Dana Polan Part Four Critical Debates The Pathos of Failure: American Films in the 1970s: Notes on the Unmotivated Hero 279 Thomas Elsaesser Trapped in the Affection Image: Hollywood’s Post-traumatic Cycle (1970-1976) 293 Christian Keathley Grim Fascination: Fingers, James Toback and 1970s American Cinema 309 Adrian Martin Allegories of Post-Fordism in 1970s New Hollywood: Countercultural Combat Films and Conspiracy Thrillers as Genre Recycling 333 Drehli Robnik Bibliography 359 List of Contributors 371 Pictures (with credits) 375 Index of Film Titles 377 Part One Introductions The Impure Cinema: New Hollywood 1967-1976 Alexander Horwath So you have stumbled indeed, without the aid of LSD or other indole alkaloids, onto a secret richness and concealed density of dream; onto a network by which X number of Americans are truly communicating whilst reserving their lies, recita- tions of routine, arid betrayals of spiritual poverty, for the official government de- livery system; maybe even onto a real alternative to the exitlessness, to the absence of surprise to life, that harrows the head of everybody American you know, and you too, sweetie.1 The title of this book suggests a certain cultural pessimism. It talks about a Golden Age and a closed chapter of history: The Last Great American Picture Show. Generally, demarcations of this sort are hard to justify and are more of a hindrance to an open engagement with films. They tend to originate in the ro- mantic notion that cultural history unfolds in discrete episodes (”narratives”), and they often reflect the formative influences of the author. If you have come of age as a cinema-goer during the heyday of New Hollywood cinema – some- time between Bonnie and Clyde and Taxi Driver – you’ve probably experi- enced the main brands of post-1970s American cinema by necessity as less rich, less intelligent, less political, as retrograde. My own first experiences of the cinema stand in contrast to this account – even if, in the end, they led to similar conclusions. I started to go the movies regularly at the end of the Seventies. Star Wars, which I saw six or seven times during 1977/78, propelled this habit. It’s a film that fairly exactly marks the point at which public discourse and popular cinema in the United States un- derwent a crucial shift in emphasis. Towards the end of the Seventies, the in- creasingly complex narrative negotiation of (both fictional and very real) con- tradictions and conflicts started to recede behind the phantasms of a neo- conservative discourse of re-mythologisation, re-evangelisation and re-milita- risation, gradually disappearing from view altogether in the course of the Reaganite era. So in a sense my first cinema was already “post-classical”2 and post-modern – a cinema of hyper-genres, often accompanied by an ironic affir- mation of shop-worn myths and relying more on textures, surfaces, aural- 10 The Last Great American Picture Show visual effects and on “somatic” audience responses. Films such as Star Wars, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Superman – The Movie, Alien, The Empire Strikes Back or Raiders of the Lost Ark strove to be seen repeat- edly, their exhilarating physical effects had to be felt over and over again in the cinema (it was the last pre-VCR era). Parallel to these experiences, however, I retrospectively began to explore the cinema of the Sixties and early Seventies – propelled by my first contact with very different and irritating Hollywood movies like Apocalypse Now and Raging Bull. Around 1980/81, the “Star-Kino”, a repertory house in Vi- enna, offered the opportunity to view within the space of a few months The Godfather (both parts one after another), Mean Streets, Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore, Taxi Driver, the complete works of Sam Peckinpah, Easy Rider, The Long Goodbye, Nashville, Zabriskie Point, Alice’s Res- taurant, Little Big Man, Klute, All the President’s Men and Shampoo. There was a stark and inspiring contrast between these works (and their view- ing context: a small, dingy suburban repertory theatre) and, on the other hand, the new spectacular films (usually shown in the “Gartenbau-Kino”, an 800- seat picture palace on the Ringstrasse in Vienna, practically designed for intox- icating “feelie” effects). This contrast has grown larger over time, so much so that it now seems reasonable to speak in terms of fundamentally different tem- poral and aesthetic zones. The mixture of styles and subject matter that, for simplicity’s sake, shall be called “New Hollywood” here, could of course still be located in films made after 1977 (in the early Eighties, for instance, Blade Runner represented the fragile intersection of the two halves of my film world).3 And even during the past fifteen years many of the (few) important American films still had their reference points – in terms of personnel, aesthetics, subject matter or attitude – in the culture of the Seventies: The Thin Red Line, Short Cuts, L.A. Confi- dential and Bulworth; the work of Martin Scorsese, Paul Schrader, John Sayles and Clint Eastwood;4 Jackie Brown, George Washington and My Own Private Idaho; the work of Richard Linklater, Paul Thomas Anderson and Wes Anderson (as well as the much-maligned, but fascinating films of Sean Penn); Drugstore Cowboy, Another Day in Paradise and Jesus’ Son; The Ice Storm, Velvet Goldmine, Almost Famous ... and last but not least, Texasville and The Two Jakes, two extremely rich – if sadly under-praised – sequels and reinterpretations of classics from the New Hollywood era (The Last Picture Show and Chinatown). On the other hand, the American “Indie” movement of the 1980s and 1990s, widely regarded as a new alternative to the major studios’ increasingly conser- vative production and distribution policies, seems to have exhausted itself – at least as a viable cultural-political movement – and split into multiple direc- The Impure Cinema: New Hollywood 1967-1976 11 Ben Johnson in The Last Picture Show tions. Often connected to a niche consciousness, the standard-bearers of inde- pendent cinema consequently helped to establish a niche market, which could then easily be appropriated or inhaled by the mainstream industry. The impor- tant “Indie” companies of the Eighties and Nineties are today part of or closely associated with major studios.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AS YOU LIKE IT, the First Production of Our 50Th Anniversary Season, and the First Show in Our Shakespearean Act
    Welcome It is my pleasure to welcome you to AS YOU LIKE IT, the first production of our 50th anniversary season, and the first show in our Shakespearean act. Shakespeare’s plays have been a cornerstone of our work at CSC, and his writing continues to reflect and refract our triumphs and trials as individuals and collectively as a society. We inevitability turn to Shakespeare to express our despair, bewilderment, and delight. So, what better place to start our anniversary year than with the contemplative search for self and belonging in As You Like It. At the heart of this beautiful play is a speech that so perfectly encapsulates our mortality. All the world’s a stage, and we go through so many changes as we make our exits and our entrances. You will have noticed many changes for CSC. We have a new look, new membership opportunities, and are programming in a new way with more productions and a season that splits into what we have called “acts.” Each act focuses either on a playwright or on an era of work. It seemed appropriate to inaugurate this with a mini-season of Shakespeare, which continues with Fiasco Theater's TWELFTH NIGHT. Then there is Act II: Americans dedicated to work by American playwrights Terrence McNally (FIRE AND AIR) and Tennessee Williams (SUMMER AND SMOKE); very little of our repertoire has focused on classics written by Americans. This act also premieres a new play by Terrence McNally, as I feel that the word classic can also encapsulate the “bigger idea” and need not always be the work of a writer from the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossroads Film and Television Program List
    Crossroads Film and Television Program List This resource list will help expand your programmatic options for the Crossroads exhibition. Work with your local library, schools, and daycare centers to introduce age-appropriate books that focus on themes featured in the exhibition. Help libraries and bookstores to host book clubs, discussion programs or other learning opportunities, or develop a display with books on the subject. This list is not exhaustive or even all encompassing – it will simply get you started. Rural themes appeared in feature-length films from the beginning of silent movies. The subject matter appealed to audiences, many of whom had relatives or direct experience with life in rural America. Historian Hal Barron explores rural melodrama in “Rural America on the Silent Screen,” Agricultural History 80 (Fall 2006), pp. 383-410. Over the decades, film and television series dramatized, romanticized, sensationalized, and even trivialized rural life, landscapes and experiences. Audiences remained loyal, tuning in to series syndicated on non-network channels. Rural themes still appear in films and series, and treatments of the subject matter range from realistic to sensational. FEATURE LENGTH FILMS The following films are listed alphabetically and by Crossroads exhibit theme. Each film can be a basis for discussions of topics relevant to your state or community. Selected films are those that critics found compelling and that remain accessible. Identity Bridges of Madison County (1995) In rural Iowa in 1965, Italian war-bride Francesca Johnson begins to question her future when National Geographic photographer Robert Kincaid pulls into her farm while her husband and children are away at the state fair, asking for directions to Roseman Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2 1970S Hollywood.Pdf
    FILM IN THE 1970s THE FILM SCHOOL GENERATION AND THE BIRTH OF THE NEW HOLLYWOOD ROGER CORMAN - Born in 1926 - Known as “King of the Bs” – his best-known film is The Little Shop of Horrors (1962) - Made many low-budget exploitation films, and used the profits to finance and distribute prestigious films – many of them directed by his protégés, who went on to become some of the most influential directors of the 1970s and beyond - Honorary Academy Award in 2009 “for his rich engendering of films and filmmakers” PETER BOGDANOVICH - Born in 1939 - Film programmer at MoMA, wrote about film for Esquire; worked with Orson Welles, John Ford, and other classic Hollywood directors - 1971 – directed The Last Picture Show – followed up with successes What’s Up, Doc?, Paper Moon - Later films didn’t fulfill his early promise, but he continues to be an influential voice on the subject of film history FRANCIS - Born in 1939 FORD - MFA from UCLA (1966) – first major COPPOLA director to graduate from a prominent university film program - Screenwriter – Patton – won first Oscar - 1969 – established American Zoetrope with his protégé George Lucas - 1972 – The Godfather - 1974 – The Godfather Part 2 and The Conversation MARTIN SCORSESE - Born in 1942 - B.S. (1964) and M.A. (1968) from NYU - Worked with Corman; and, as his student project, edited Woodstock (1970) - Rose to fame in 1973 – Mean Streets – not a commercial hit, but had a dynamic style, and set a template for character types and themes and settings he would return to throughout his career GEORGE LUCAS - Born in 1944 - USC graduate – won 1965 National Student Film Festival with THX-1138 - Apprenticed with Coppola, and later collaborated with him - First major success – American Graffiti (1973) - Invested those profits into Lucasfilm, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • National Film Registry Titles Listed by Release Date
    National Film Registry Titles 1989-2017: Listed by Year of Release Year Year Title Released Inducted Newark Athlete 1891 2010 Blacksmith Scene 1893 1995 Dickson Experimental Sound Film 1894-1895 2003 Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze 1894 2015 The Kiss 1896 1999 Rip Van Winkle 1896 1995 Corbett-Fitzsimmons Title Fight 1897 2012 Demolishing and Building Up the Star Theatre 1901 2002 President McKinley Inauguration Footage 1901 2000 The Great Train Robbery 1903 1990 Life of an American Fireman 1903 2016 Westinghouse Works 1904 1904 1998 Interior New York Subway, 14th Street to 42nd Street 1905 2017 Dream of a Rarebit Fiend 1906 2015 San Francisco Earthquake and Fire, April 18, 1906 1906 2005 A Trip Down Market Street 1906 2010 A Corner in Wheat 1909 1994 Lady Helen’s Escapade 1909 2004 Princess Nicotine; or, The Smoke Fairy 1909 2003 Jeffries-Johnson World’s Championship Boxing Contest 1910 2005 White Fawn’s Devotion 1910 2008 Little Nemo 1911 2009 The Cry of the Children 1912 2011 A Cure for Pokeritis 1912 2011 From the Manger to the Cross 1912 1998 The Land Beyond the Sunset 1912 2000 Musketeers of Pig Alley 1912 2016 Bert Williams Lime Kiln Club Field Day 1913 2014 The Evidence of the Film 1913 2001 Matrimony’s Speed Limit 1913 2003 Preservation of the Sign Language 1913 2010 Traffic in Souls 1913 2006 The Bargain 1914 2010 The Exploits of Elaine 1914 1994 Gertie The Dinosaur 1914 1991 In the Land of the Head Hunters 1914 1999 Mabel’s Blunder 1914 2009 1 National Film Registry Titles 1989-2017: Listed by Year of Release Year Year
    [Show full text]
  • March 28, 2001 (III:10) Notable Recent Job Has Been Playing Tony Soprano’S Psychiatrist’S Psychiatrist
    PETER BOGDANOVICH (30 July 1939, Kingston, New York, USA ) most March 28, 2001 (III:10) notable recent job has been playing Tony Soprano’s psychiatrist’s psychiatrist. “Many French cineasts and film critics went on to become major filmmakers, but in America only one such scholar made that transition: Peter Bogdanovich. This lifelong film buff wrote dozens of articles, books, and program notes about Hollywood before settling there in the mid 1960s. He fell in with producer Roger Corman, becoming a jack-of-all-trades on The Wild Angels (1966) and reworking a Russian sci-fi epic into Voyage to the Planet of Prehistoric Women (1967). Bogd anov ich's first real film was the suspenseful Targets (1968), which he directed, produced, and cowrote with then-wife Polly Platt. After making a documentary, Directed by John Ford (1971), he directed the melancholy Larry McMurtry story The Last Picture Show (1971), which becam e a major critical and commercial hit…. “Celebrated as Hollywood's latest wunderkind, he made two more big hits: the screwball farce What's U p, Doc? (1972) and another period piece, Paper Moon (1973), which brought an Oscar to debuting Tatum O'Neal. Both films were very much dependent on references to earlier films and directors, but there was no denying his superb craftsmanship and assu red handling of actors. Bu t it was perceived that his relationship with Cybill Shepherd led to his undoing. Two Shepherd vehicles-Daisy Miller (1974) and At Long Last Love (1975)-were major stiffs, and the well-intentioned Nickelodeon (1976) was pronounced D.O.A.
    [Show full text]
  • American Auteur Cinema: the Last – Or First – Great Picture Show 37 Thomas Elsaesser
    For many lovers of film, American cinema of the late 1960s and early 1970s – dubbed the New Hollywood – has remained a Golden Age. AND KING HORWATH PICTURE SHOW ELSAESSER, AMERICAN GREAT THE LAST As the old studio system gave way to a new gen- FILMFILM FFILMILM eration of American auteurs, directors such as Monte Hellman, Peter Bogdanovich, Bob Rafel- CULTURE CULTURE son, Martin Scorsese, but also Robert Altman, IN TRANSITION IN TRANSITION James Toback, Terrence Malick and Barbara Loden helped create an independent cinema that gave America a different voice in the world and a dif- ferent vision to itself. The protests against the Vietnam War, the Civil Rights movement and feminism saw the emergence of an entirely dif- ferent political culture, reflected in movies that may not always have been successful with the mass public, but were soon recognized as audacious, creative and off-beat by the critics. Many of the films TheThe have subsequently become classics. The Last Great Picture Show brings together essays by scholars and writers who chart the changing evaluations of this American cinema of the 1970s, some- LaLastst Great Great times referred to as the decade of the lost generation, but now more and more also recognised as the first of several ‘New Hollywoods’, without which the cin- American ema of Francis Coppola, Steven Spiel- American berg, Robert Zemeckis, Tim Burton or Quentin Tarantino could not have come into being. PPictureicture NEWNEW HOLLYWOODHOLLYWOOD ISBN 90-5356-631-7 CINEMACINEMA ININ ShowShow EDITEDEDITED BY BY THETHE
    [Show full text]
  • The Cat's Meow
    THE CAT’S MEOW PRODUCTION NOTES Directed by Peter Bogdanovich SYNOPSIS From award-winning screenwriter Steven Peros and acclaimed director Peter Bogdanovich comes The Cat’s Meow, an extraordinary look at a fateful excursion of “fun and frolic” aboard William Randolph Hearst’s private yacht in November of 1924 that brought together some of the century’s best-known personalities and resulted in a still-unsolved, hushed-up killing. As Hearst and his lover actress Marion Davies set sail from San Pedro Harbor early one Saturday morning, hosting a small group that includes the brilliant but self-absorbed Charlie Chaplin, film pioneer Thomas Ince preoccupied with his recent financial setbacks, ambitious gossip columnist Louella Parsons, and the eccentric British Victorian novelist Elinor Glyn, it quickly becomes clear that although witty repartee and double entendre are the order of the day, deceit and deception are also on the menu. Everyone, it seems, has a secret agenda: Ince, whose pioneering work in defining the role of the film producer has been favorably compared to D.W. Griffith’s contributions to directing, is determined to seal a partnership with Hearst’s Cosmopolitan Pictures despite W.R.’s seeming lack of interest; New York-based film critic Louella Parsons has her eye on a transfer to the west coast where she can cover the film industry more intimately; Ince’s lover, actress Margaret Livingston, no longer cares to keep their affair a secret; Hearst himself suspects that his paramour Davies has been unfaithful with the legendary comic Chaplin; and Chaplin indeed schemes to steal away the beautiful actress from the richest man in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • On Tour (Aug – Oct 2021)
    On Tour (Aug – Oct 2021) Cinema Rediscovered is back for its 5th Edition (28 July – 1 August 2021) celebrating the return to cinemas with a selection of restorations and rediscoveries. Full Festival line-up: watershed.co.uk/cinema-rediscovered Book any of the titles below under the Cinema Rediscovered on Tour banner and access: - Assets (copy, images, trailers, bespoke content such as pre-recorded screening intros) - National PR campaign (Sarah Harvey PR) and MUBI cross promotion* - Invitation to Cinema Rediscovered ‘s Reframing Film industry strand (29 – 30 July) and access to a 50% partner discount to festival tickets. *Optional: audiences for CR tour bookings can receive a free one month trial from MUBI, the global streaming service, production company and film distributor. Note that access to guest speakers and other titles from the festival line-up can be looked into on request. Contact: [email protected] See Credit Lines / Logos below. Also note that a high res DCP slide will be supplied for the cinema for the start of your screening. TOUR IMAGES & TRAILERS: Download folder TOUR TITLES – QUICK LINKS THE STORY OF A THREE DAY PASS 2 1971: THE YEAR HOLLYWOOD WENT INDEPENDENT 3 TWO-LANE BLACKTOP 4 KLUTE 5 MCCABE & MRS MILLER 5 THE LAST PICTURE SHOW 5 FIVE EASY PIECES 6 TWELVE 30 COLLECTIVE PRESENT: NO PLACE LIKE HOME 6 THE STORY OF A THREE DAY PASS 4K Restoration Rec Cert: 15 Dir: Melvin Van Peeble USA 1967 87mins Cast: Harry Baird, Nicole Berger, Pierre Doris Source: Cinema Rediscovered / Janus Films Book: [email protected] Terms: £80 MG vs 35% (+ UK Transport or download costs) Format: DCP or Eclairplay Trailer: watch & download A New 4K restoration by IndieCollect in consultation with Mario Van Peebles, with support from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Bogdanovich O El Cinema De La Quotidianitat
    TREBALL DE RECERCA peter bogdanovich o el cinema de la quotidianitat Dirigit per Isidre Ferré Anna Cornellas i Fernández batxillerat 2n A 8-1-2004 2 Índex 0. Introducció ............................................................5 1. El director .............................................................8 1.1. Biografia....................................................................................................................8 1.2. L’Estil dels seus films ...........................................................................................11 1.3. Influències rebudes...............................................................................................12 1.4. Posada en escena ................................................................................................13 1.4.1. Escenari ..........................................................................................................14 1.4.2. Personatges....................................................................................................14 1.4.2.1. Vestuari ....................................................................................................14 1.4.2.2. Físics ........................................................................................................15 1.4.3. Músiques.........................................................................................................15 1.4.4. Fotografia........................................................................................................15 2. Els personatges
    [Show full text]
  • PETER BOGDANOVICH to VISIT WEX “He Remains One of the Best Directors in America….”—David Thomson, the New Biographical Dictionary of Film
    For immediate release: November 22, 2009 (updated December 2009) Media contact: Karen Simonian, [email protected] or 614 292-9923 PETER BOGDANOVICH TO VISIT WEX “He remains one of the best directors in America….”—David Thomson, The New Biographical Dictionary of Film Peter Bogdanovich—the storied director, actor, and chronicler of classical Hollywood—will visit the Wexner Center on Saturday, January 16 to introduce a screening of What’s Up, Doc?, his pitch-perfect tribute to classic screwball comedies. The screening will be followed by an onstage conversation about his work. His visit is part of a two-day mini-tribute concentrating on his early films (see schedule below). “We’re thrilled to welcome Peter Bogdanovich to Columbus,” says Wexner Center film curator David Filipi. “He cuts a singular figure in postwar American cinema, and we’re pleased to be able to offer this special event for local and regional audiences.” Deeply versed in the history of Hollywood film, Bogdanovich emerged as a public figure beginning in the 1960s through a series of sympathetic and deeply informed studies and interviews with such legendary directors as John Ford, Howard Hawks, Orson Welles, Fritz Lang, and Allan Dwan, among others. This extraordinary alertness to the legacy of Hollywood Clockwise from top left: Peter Bogdanovich (image courtesy of Ace filmmaking hence informs his own work as a director, Photos); Cybill Shepherd in The Last joined to a rare sensitivity in his collaborations with Picture Show (image courtesy of Sony actors; he himself studied under the legendary Stella Pictures); and Ryan O’Neal and Barbra Adler in the 1950s, and, a gifted raconteur and actor, Streisand in What’s Up, Doc? (image courtesy of Warner Bros.) he occasionally still works in that capacity, perhaps most notably as psychiatrist Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcmurtry Brings Characters Old and New Along for the Ride
    8E • SUNDAY, MAY 18, 2014OLIVING MAHA WORLD-HERALD BOOKS McMurtry brings characters old and new along for the ride iting characters, including Earp Endearment.” His newest offering, ‘The Last Kind Words Saloon,’ and Holliday. Both “The Last Picture Show” features historical i gures and one from an earlier tale “That’s fun, to go back and and its sequel, “Texasville,” see your characters at different were fi lmed in Archer City. ARCHER CITY, Texas (AP) West — this time peeking into stages of their lives,” he said, Don Graham, a professor of — Standing among the tower- the lives of Wyatt Earp and Doc noting that he followed the char- English and American literature ing shelves in his bookstore in Holliday as they ramble through acters from “The Last Picture at the University of Texas in Show” through several books, the small Texas town where he Texas, Colorado and Arizona. Austin, said McMurtry is “pre- marking their transformation grew up, Pulitzer Prize-winning “I usually start a book with eminently a storyteller.” from teenagers to old men. author Larry McMurtry says he some notion about a charac- “He’s a great creator of char- Andrew Graybill, director of has a need to be among books. ter that I’m curious about or acters and dialogue. That’s one the Clements Center for South- “I’m very attached to the interested in,” McMurtry said in of the reasons he’s had so much west Studies at Southern Meth- success in Hollywood,” Graham books. I need them. I need to be an interview. “And I think that’s odist University, said McMurtry said.
    [Show full text]
  • Loft Film Fest 13 Loft Kids Fest 14 Building for the Future 15 Donors 21 Volunteers 22 Board of Directors & Loft Staff MISSION STATEMENT
    The Loft Cinema ANNUAL REPORT 2014 02 Mission Statement Annual 03 Letter from the Report Executive Director 04 A Brief History 05 Impact 06 At the Box Office Financials 07 Overview 08 Revenue and Expenses Events 09 Programming 11 Loft Film Fest 13 Loft Kids Fest 14 Building for the Future 15 Donors 21 Volunteers 22 Board of Directors & Loft Staff MISSION STATEMENT The Loft is a local nonprofit cinema dedicated to creating community through film, honoring the vision of filmmakers, celebrating ideas and promoting the appreciation and understanding of the art of film. 02 DEAR FRIENDS OF THE LOFT, As I look back on 2014, I am truly amazed and humbled by what The Loft was able to accomplish. I believe that the foundation we carefully laid over 14 years has solidified into a strong, sustainable business model that allows us to serve our patrons, supporters and the entire Greater Tucson community. The Loft had its best year ever in 2014, making more than $1,000,000 at the box office. This is no easy feat with just 3 screens. What makes it more exciting is that 20% of the tickets were free, which means that we generated one million dollars from 80% of the people who came through our doors! So why so many free films and events? The answer is simple: our mission is to build community through film, and by making one-fifth of our experiences free, we remove any barrier - everyone and anyone can participate. The Loft’s administrative staff, our brain trust, along with our Board of Directors, does a remarkable job of making sure The Loft is a sustainable arts organization.
    [Show full text]