CLST 276: the World of Classical Rome Spring Semester 2018 Mondays & Wednesdays | 9:30–10:45 Am | Section A03 Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CLST 276: the World of Classical Rome Spring Semester 2018 Mondays & Wednesdays | 9:30–10:45 Am | Section A03 Dr CLST 276: The World of Classical Rome Spring Semester 2018 Mondays & Wednesdays | 9:30–10:45 am | Section A03 Dr. David Lambert Email: [email protected] Office hours by appointment Course Description The World of Classical Rome explores the history of Rome in the last century of the Roman Republic and in the reign of Augustus, the first Roman emperor. During the second and first centuries BC, the Romans conquered almost the entire Mediterranean world. The wealth of the Roman empire produced the public baths, gardens, libraries, circuses, theatres and amphitheatres whose ruins have fascinated the world ever since. This was the period which saw the creation of many of the greatest works of ancient art and literature. Yet it was also an age of corruption, violence, civil war, and intrigue. While Rome conquered the world outside Italy, its political system came under increasing strain and eventually collapsed into seemingly endless civil wars, ending under Augustus with the transformation of the Roman Republic into an autocratic monarchy. In this course, major issues in Rome’s political history, the study of the city of Rome, and the wider Roman world in this period are examined by means of primary sources and secondary literature from a variety of perspectives, to explore the drama of the history, society, and culture of Classical Rome and its empire, one of the most turbulent periods of history. Learning Outcomes This course is a survey of Roman history from about 133 BC to 14 AD. By the end of the course, students should be able to: • Demonstrate knowledge of the events, institutions, trends, significant political, cultural and social accomplishments of the age, and of its major figures. • Show awareness of the problems and debates concerning key themes from this period of history. • Demonstrate an understanding of the working of historical mechanisms. They need to be able to scrutinize, evaluate and critically analyze the available source material, and be sensitive to the problems of interpreting evidence. Required Textbook • Christopher S. Mackay, The Breakdown of the Roman Republic: From Oligarchy to Empire (Cambridge University Press). • Additional primary and secondary material will be made available on Sakai. 1 Attendance Policy In accordance with the JFRC mission to promote a higher level of academic rigor, all courses adhere to the following absence policy: For all classes meeting once a week, students cannot incur more than one unexcused absence. For all classes meeting twice a week, students cannot incur more than two unexcused absences. For all classes meeting three times a week, students cannot incur more than two unexcused absences. This course meets twice a week, thus a total of two unexcused absence(s) will be permitted. Unexcused absences beyond these will result in a lowering of your final grade. Assessment Final grade assessments will be based on the combination of two exams, one mid-term and one final, and one large essay concerning a topic of free choice and based on primary sources and secondary literature. A small percentage of each student’s grade will be derived from attendance and participation. Participation 10% Midterm Exam 30% Essay 30% Final Exam 30 % The two exams will test your knowledge and understanding of material in the textbook (Christopher S. Mackay, The Breakdown of the Roman Republic), the topics dealt with in the lectures and seminars, and the additional literature prescribed for each class. The textbook provides a general outline of the developments of Roman history, society and culture in the period. Grading 94-100: A 90-93: A- 87-89: B+ 84-86: B 80-83: B- 77-79: C+ 74-76: C 70-73: C- 67-69: D+ 60-66: D 59 or lower: F 2 Written work and examinations meriting the grade of “A” (excellent) must: • address the assigned question or topic directly and intelligently; • demonstrate a careful and considered reading of the texts at hand; • present a lucid thesis and a reasoned argument in its defense; • use correct grammar, punctuation, and sentence construction; • make appropriate use of quotations from the texts; • reveal thoughtfulness, originality and insight. Written work and examinations awarded the grade of “B” (good) adequately fulfil a majority of these criteria, with areas of improvement indicated by grading remarks and comments. The grade of “C” (average) is given when written work and examinations fail to meet most criteria, therefore indicating to the student that an appointment should be made with the professor, before the next assignment, to discuss methods for improvement. Finally, the grade of “D” is assigned to written work and examinations that are unacceptable, according to the criteria outlined above, in which case an appointment must be made with the professor and arrangements determined for re-submitting the assignments in an acceptable form. The Essay Students are free to choose their own essay topic (within the general subject matter of the course), in consultation with the instructor. All essay topics must be approved by the instructor, and students must produce a rough draft of their essay for review before final submission of the essay. Students are expected to base their essay on suitable reading, consisting of relevant primary sources and appropriate modern scholarly literature (books, journal articles, and scholarly reference works, whether in printed or online form). They must show that they have made a reasonable effort to read and engage with any reading for their essay suggested by the instructor. Essays have a word-limit of 3,000 words, including footnotes/endnotes. Essays submitted after the final deadline will be penalized by a grade. A timetable with the various deadlines relating to the essay (proposing a topic, submitting a draft, final submission) will be provided by the instructor at the beginning of the semester. Academic Honesty Plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are unacceptable at the JFRC and will be dealt with in accordance with Loyola University Chicago’s guidelines. Please familiarize yourself with Loyola’s standards here: http://www.luc.edu/academics/catalog/undergrad/reg_academicintegrity.shtml. You are responsible for understanding what constitutes plagiarism according to the LUC Student Handbook. 3 Disabilities Students with documented disabilities who wish to discuss academic accommodations should contact the instructor during the first week of class, as well as the Senior Academic Services Advisor. 4 Course Program Week 1: The Rise of Rome • Christopher S. Mackay, The Breakdown of the Roman Republic, 10-30, 405-412. • G.J. Bradley, ‘The Roman Republic: Political History’, in E. Bispham (ed.), Roman Europe (Oxford, 2008), 32-68: pp. 32-60. • Mary Beard & Michael Crawford, Rome in the Late Republic, 2nd ed. (London, 1999), 40-59. • Edward Bispham, ‘Literary Sources’, in N. Morstein-Marx and N. Rosenstein, A Companion to the Roman Republic (Oxford, 2006), 29-50. Week 2: Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus • Mackay, Breakdown, 30-83. • Stephen L. Dyson, Community and Society in Roman Italy (Baltimore/London, 1992), 23-55. • Saskia T. Roselaar, Public Land in the Roman Republic (Oxford, 2010), 221-256. Week 3: Gaius Marius and Popular Politics • Mackay, Breakdown, 84-133 • Fergus Millar, ‘Politics, Persuasion and the People before the Social War (150–90 B.C.)’, Journal of Roman Studies 76 (1986), 1-11. Reprinted in Fergus Millar, Rome, the Greek World, and the East, vol. 1, The Roman Republic and the Augustan Revolution, edited by H.M. Cotton and G.M. Rogers (Chapel Hill/London, 2002), 143-161. • Alexander Yakobson, Elections and Electioneering in Rome (Stuttgart, 1999), 13-19. • Henrik Mouritsen, Italian Unification: A Study in Ancient and Modern Historiography (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 70; London 1998)’, 109-127. Week 4 Sulla and the Reaction • Mackay, Breakdown, 134-195. • Arthur Keaveney, Sulla: The Last Republican, 2nd ed. (London, 2005), 45-63, 140-167. • P.A. Brunt, ‘The Army and the Land in the Roman Revolution’, in P.A. Brunt, The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays (Oxford, 1988), 240-275. Week 5: Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus and the return of popular politics • Mackay, Breakdown, 196-228. • Robin Seager, Pompey the Great: A Political Biography, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 2002), 30-62. • Fergus Millar, The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic (Ann Arbor, 1998), 73-93. Week 6: Cicero • Mackay, Breakdown, 229-237. • Kathryn Tempest, Cicero: Politics and Persuasion in Ancient Rome (London, 2011), 71-100. • Catherine Steel, Reading Cicero (London, 2005), 21-48. • Anthony Corbeill, ‘Cicero and the intellectual milieu of the late Republic’ in C. Steel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (Cambridge, 2013), 9-24. • Ann Vasaly, ‘The political impact of Cicero’s speeches’, in C. Steel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (Cambridge, 2013), 141-159. Week 7: Roman Imperialism • John Rich, ‘Fear, Greed and Glory: The Causes of Roman War Making in the Middle Republic’, in J. Rich & G. Shipley (eds.), War and Society in the Roman World (London 1995), 38-68. • Lea Beness and Tom Hillard, ‘Rei militaris virtus ... orbem terrarum parere huic imperio coegit: The 5 Transformation of Roman imperium’ in D. Hoyos (ed.), A Companion to Roman Imperialism (Leiden 2013), 141-153. • John Serrati, ‘Imperialism and the Fall of the Republic: Post hoc ergo propter hoc?’, ibid. 155-168. Week 8: Caesar • Mackay, Breakdown, 238-303. • Erich S. Gruen, ‘Caesar as a Politician’, in Miriam Griffin (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar (Chichester, 2009), 23-36. • Robert Morstein-Marx, ‘Caesar's Alleged Fear of Prosecution and His Ratio Absentis in the Approach to the Civil War’, Historia 56/2 (2007), 159-178. Week 9: From the Ides of March to Actium • Mackay, Breakdown, pp. 304-361. • Andrew Lintott, ‘The Assassination’, in Miriam Griffin (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar (Chichester, 2009), 72-82. • Josiah Osgood, Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire (Cambridge, 2006), 62-106.
Recommended publications
  • David Rafferty, the Fall of the Roman Republic
    The Fall of the Roman Republic DAVID RAFFERTY the Mediterranean, meant there was no longer anyone for the Romans to fear, which in turn meant that Rome lost her discipline. Another How did crises change ancient theme blamed greed and ambition for Rome’s societies? problems: greed and success had made some men very rich and others very poor. The rich How did key individuals contribute to had appetites which the Republic could not such events? contain, while they also became corrupt, and the poor had nothing to lose from change. A How might we judge the historical similar theme blamed the ambitions of the significance of these crises and the great men who brought down their Republic: individuals who took part in them?1 they were no longer content to be renowned in a free state, but wanted to dominate their fellow-citizens. Historical significance Most modern scholars have not accepted these explanations. But many causes have been Why did the Roman Republic fall? This blamed for the collapse of the Republic, too question was of great interest to the Romans many to list here. Lintott’s CAH chapter briefly themselves, both at the time and later. The outlines some of them, but the Blackwell best starting point is Andrew Lintott’s chapter Companion to the Roman Republic is a better 1, ‘The crisis of the Republic: sources and source. Such companions tend to be uneven, source-problems’ in CAH 9 (that is, volume but this one is excellent, and thoroughly 9 of the second edition of the Cambridge recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • World of Classical Rome Loyola University Chicago John Felice Rome Center Autumn Semester 2019 Wednesdays | 2:30-5:30Pm Dr
    CLST/ROST 276: The World of Classical Rome Loyola University Chicago John Felice Rome Center Autumn Semester 2019 Wednesdays | 2:30-5:30pm Dr. Alexander W.H. Evers, DPhil (Oxon) Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Wed, 12:00pm-01:00pm, or by appointment Course Description Rome – Umbilicus Mundi, the navel of the world, the centre of civilisation, by far the greatest city in Antiquity. The “most splendid of splendid cities” counted approximately one million inhabitants in its hey-day. Lavish provisions of food and wine, as well as spectacles and various forms of urban decoration, magnificent temples and public buildings were pretty much the norm. Public baths, gardens, libraries, circuses, theatres and amphitheatres gave access to all the citizens of Rome. An elaborate network of roads and aqueducts, well-maintained throughout the centuries, all led to the Eternal City. It must have appeared at the time that Rome would never end! The World of Classical Rome takes us on a journey – a journey through time. If you always thought space to be the final frontier, then you’re wrong: time is! This course investigates the historical development of the Roman people through study of their history, politics, society, and culture – especially in the 1st centuries BC and AD, the turning point of Republican into Imperial Rome. Actually, speaking of turning points, the last phrase of the previous, first paragraph, might be a bit misleading… At least to a contemporary Roman at the time… Because to some of those old chaps, the Roman Republic seemed to be
    [Show full text]
  • A Fork in the Road: the Catilinarian Conspiracy's Impact
    A Fork in the Road: The Catilinarian Conspiracy‘s Impact on Cicero‘s relationships with Pompey, Crassus` and Caesar Jeffrey Larson History 499: Senior Thesis June 13, 2011 © Jeffrey Larson, 2011 1 But concerning friendship, all, to a man, think the same thing: those who have devoted themselves to public life; those who find their joy in science and philosophy; those who manage their own business free from public cares; and, finally, those who are wholly given up to sensual pleasures — all believe that without friendship life is no life at all. .1 The late Roman Republic was filled with crucial events which shaped not only the political environment of the Republic, but also altered the personal and political relationships of the individuals within that Republic. Four of the most powerful, and most discussed, characters of this time are Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 BC – 43 BC), Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (106 BC – 48 BC), Marcus Licinius Crassus (c. 115 BC – 53 BC), and Gaius Julius Caesar (c. 100 BC – 44 BC). These men often crossed paths and some even had close friendships with each other. Other than Pompeius, better known as Pompey, all the aforementioned individuals were involved, or reportedly involved, in one event which had profound effects on the personal and political relationships of all four individuals. This event is known as the Catilinarian Conspiracy of 63 BC. The Catilinarian Conspiracy was a pivotal episode in the politics of the Late Roman Republic that damaged both the political and personal relationships of Cicero, Pompey, Crassus, and Caesar. Politics in the Roman Republic was dominated by a small number of members of the senatorial class.
    [Show full text]
  • 308 BOOK REVIEWS Seems to Be Provable, and Under These Circumstances It Is Unlikely That He Cribbed Entire Argu­ Ments from His Authorities
    308 BOOK REVIEWS seems to be provable, and under these circumstances it is unlikely that he cribbed entire argu­ ments from his authorities. Petrella discusses an unusual aspect of the treatment of Pamphylia, noting the complete lack of information on leading citizens as supplied in the case of cities elsewhere in Asia Minor. This corresponds to the geographer’s perception of Pamphylia as a centre of low cultural achievement reflecting its involvement in the pirate trade. The ideal against which this is measured appears to be that of the Greek polis, but city life did develop early in Pamphylia, although linguistic indi­ viduality remained important. Precise understanding of integration is hampered by sporadic archaeological work, but the topographical importance of Pamphylia in the age of Strabo and beforehand is to be emphasised. Some of these points can be demonstrated from the epigraphic record. Attaleia is typical with a mix of negotiatores italici and veterans, many of whom origi­ nated from Pisidian Antioch. There is a review of the considerable number of notables known from the major centres. Sometimes this exploration deals with individuals well beyond Strabo’s own age, and their relevance is to understanding an acme of city life in Pamphylia rather than to an exact match with what Strabo claims is the debased quality of the country as a whole. Petrella thinks the evidence is sufficient to show that these cities continued for a long time to operate under the empire in an unchanged environment, autonomous cities maintaining their Hellenistic magistracies, and their own coinage. Overall, it can be seen that this volume from Perugia treats an enormous range of material, and will be indispensable for serious students of Strabo’s Geography, especially those with a pri­ mary interest in the books on Asia Minor.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Blood in the Streets: Mapping Political Violence Onto
    Bates College SCARAB Honors Theses Capstone Projects Spring 5-2016 Searching for Blood in the Streets: Mapping Political Violence onto Urban Topography in the Late Roman Republic, 80-50 BCE Theodore Samuel Rube Bates College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses Recommended Citation Rube, Theodore Samuel, "Searching for Blood in the Streets: Mapping Political Violence onto Urban Topography in the Late Roman Republic, 80-50 BCE" (2016). Honors Theses. 186. http://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses/186 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Capstone Projects at SCARAB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of SCARAB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Searching for Blood in the Streets: Mapping Political Violence onto Urban Topography in the Late Roman Republic, 80-50 BCE An Honors Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Classical and Medieval Studies Bates College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts By Theodore Samuel Rube Lewiston, Maine March 28th, 2016 2 Acknowledgements I want to take this opportunity to express my sincerest gratitude to everybody who during this process has helped me out, cheered me up, cheered me on, distracted me, bothered me, and has made the writing of this thesis eminently more enjoyable for their presence. I am extremely grateful for the guidance, mentoring, and humor of Professor Margaret Imber, who has helped me through every step of this adventure. I’d also like to give a very special thanks to the Bates Student Research Fund, which provided me the opportunity to study Rome’s topography in person.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civic Education of Cicero's Ideal Orator
    [Expositions 8.1 (2014) 122–144] Expositions (online) ISSN: 1747–5376 The Civic Education of Cicero’s Ideal Orator JOSEPH A. DILUZIO Baylor University Scarcely five years after the Roman people hailed him as “father of the fatherland” for his role in saving the Republic from a revolutionary plot, Cicero was banished from Rome. A violent and demagogic tribune, backed by a cabal of ruthless senators including Julius Caesar and Pompey the Great, had arranged for his removal. Though he would return the following year, Rome’s leading orator increasingly found himself politically hamstrung and the republican system plagued by dysfunction. Intent on remedying the ills of the Republic, Cicero took to writing philosophy. He began, significantly enough, with On the Ideal Orator (de Oratore), the first of three dialogues written over five years, all of which aimed to defend and encourage the teaching of republican values among the Roman nobility. All senators were orators capable of addressing the courts, the Senate, and popular meetings; through their speeches, they set policy, advocated justice, shaped public opinion, and won popular acclaim. Since the end of the second century BC, however, Rome’s republican consensus had faltered, and a number of powerful orators had used their education and natural abilities to stir unrest for their own political ends. Cicero had noted this fact in the introduction to his youthful de Inventione, a rhetorical handbook. Despite the differences in style and content, the prologue of de Inventione adumbrates several themes that would feature prominently in his later de Oratore, among them, the essential role of oratory in establishing and sustaining the Republic and the need for orators to possess wisdom and eloquence (Inv.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Sir Fergus Millar (1935-2019): a Collection of Tributes
    Professor Sir Fergus Millar (1935-2019): A collection of tributes Obituaries Alan Bowman (The Guardian, 30th July 2019) In 1977 the historian Fergus Millar, who has died aged 84, published a massive book, The Emperor in the Roman World, that got to grips in an entirely original way with the institutional character of the empire and the role of its head of state. Based in large part on an encyclopaedic knowledge of Roman law, Millar’s analysis showed in detail how a great empire actually functioned with effective leadership and multifarious modes of communication. Its assertion that “the emperor was what the emperor did”, presaged in a 1965 article, “Emperors at Work”, prompted considerable controversy in the world of ancient history. One reviewer, Keith Hopkins, objected that the emperor was also how he was thought about, imagined, represented, worshipped and so on. Mary Beard, a graduate student at the time, recalled how a live debate between the two both energised the subject and demonstrated how such differences of view could co-exist in a friendly manner. The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic (1998) argued that the democratic and particularly the electoral processes of the second and first centuries BC were much more critical and effective than had traditionally been thought. It stimulated discussion, as also did lectures delivered at the University of California, Berkeley (2002-03), published as A Greek Roman Empire: Power and Belief under Theodosius II, 408-450 (2006). Here Millar combined the codification of Roman law and the acts of the Church councils in the fifth century into a compelling and entirely original account of the character and the functioning of the later eastern empire, a century after its formal separation from the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Fergus Millar FBA FAHA 1935-2019
    AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF THE HUMANITIES humanities.org.au Fergus Millar FBA FAHA 1935-2019 Fergus Graham Burtholme Millar was born in Edinburgh on 5th July 1935 and remained throughout his life a proud Scotsman and one who would have loved to prove his prowess on Murrayfield for his beloved national rugby team. He went to the prestigious Edinburgh Academy but unforeseen changes in family circumstances meant that he had to complete his schooling at Loretto School. In both these ‘Dùn Èideann’ institutions Fergus excelled in Classics and a scholarship at Trinity College to read Literae Humaniores at Oxford came as no surprise. Like so many linguistically gifted young persons of the Cold War generation, he did his National Service before university and acquired considerable proficiency in Russian. After graduation in 1958, Fergus won a Prize Australian Academy of the Humanities archives Fellowship at All Souls College Oxford where Professor Sir Fergus Millar FBA FAHA, Camden he remained until 1964. Instead of launching Professor of Ancient History at Oxford (1984- into an academic career on the basis of this 2002), was a titan in the study of the Ancient prestigious fellowship, he studied for a Doctor World. As a Roman historian his standing of Philosophy (DPhil) degree in Ancient History among all time greats like Theodore under the tutelage of Sir Ronald Syme, FBA Mommsen, Sir Ronald Syme, Arnaldo OM (Camden Professor 1944-70). He would Momigliano and A.H.M. (Hugo) Jones is later become the first Camden Professor to unchallenged. He also had strong connections have an earned doctorate.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul's Panegyric for the Messiah
    Paul’s Encomion for the Messiah: Colossians 1:15-20 as ὁ βασιλικὸς λόγος ABSTRACT The conceptual and linguistic resources for understanding the Christ-hymn of Colossians 1:15-20 is not ‘Wisdom-Christology’ or Middle-Platonic speculation upon intermediary figures but is, rather, found in the ancient practice of praise of kings, emperors, and rulers. Hellenistic kings and Roman emperors were often assimilated to particular gods and thereby received honors – including hymnic praise – reserved for deities. Similarly, Jews often praised both past kings and the hoped-for coming messianic king through hymns – most notably in poetic seams in the Pentateuch and in the Psalms. One frequently finds the following reasons for praising the king in most hymns: a) the king is a vicegerent of a god; b) the king upholds and sustains the created universe or oikoumene; c) the king is a worthy ruler and benefactor who has bestowed gifts of harmony and peace to his subjects. All three reasons are paralleled in the Christ-hymn of Col. 1:15- 20. Paul’s praise of the Messiah in the Colossian Christ-hymn is a creative development of Jewish Messianism and Hellenistic-Roman kingship ideology and counters the Colossians’ preoccupation with other powers as it allows them to participate in the rule of Christ as the only true king’s rule. According to Pliny’s report to Trajan, the early Christians “were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god (carmenque Christi quasi deo)” (Letter 10.96; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Art of the Roman Republic
    ART OF THE ROMAN REPUBLIC Fall semester 2010 ARH 362; unique no. 20100 MWF 1‐2 Prof. Penelope J. E. Davies DFA 2.518 232‐2362 [email protected] Office hours MW 2‐3 or by appt. Course description: This course covers the art and architecture of Republican Rome, ca. 500‐44 BC, when Rome began to establish dominance in the Mediterranean and to develop an artistic tradition that would flourish into the Empire. Copious wealth from victories abroad leads to massive public works such as temples, civic buildings and triumphal monuments; newly‐developed cement offers freedom to architects to innovate in unimagined ways; and portraiture and historical narrative articulate the competing ambitions of elite families, jostling for political prominence. Students should gain a good grounding in Republican Roman visual culture and politics, and be able to assess works of art within their political and social context. Reading: There is no textbook for this class. A History of the Roman Republic by Klaus Bringmann is mandatory reading, to provide a context for the lectures. Additional readings for individual classes will be provided online. For students with little familiarity with ancient Rome, A. and N. Ramage, Roman Art, from Romulus to Constantine, provides a superficial overview. General information concerning sites in Rome can be found in L. Richardson Jr’s A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome and the more comprehensive 5‐volume Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae edited by M. Steinby (in a variety of languages). Both of these works are available in the Classics Library Reference Room. Also useful: Axel Boethius, Etruscan and Early Roman Architecture (Pelican 1970); Amanda Claridge, Rome, An Oxford Archaeological Guide (Oxford 1998); Diana E.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxury at Rome: Avaritia, Aemulatio and the Mos Maiorum
    Roderick Thirkell White Ex Historia 117 Roderick Thirkell White1 University College London Luxury at Rome: avaritia, aemulatio and the mos maiorum This article sets out to put into perspective the ancient Roman discourse about luxury, which our extant literary sources almost universally condemn, on moral grounds. In it, I aim to define the scope and character of Roman luxury, and how it became an issue for the Romans, from the end of the third century BC to the beginning of the second century AD. With the aid of modern thinking about luxury and the diffusion of ideas in a society, I shed light on the reasons for the upsurge in luxurious living and, in particular, on how luxuries spread through the elite population, an issue that has been largely neglected by modern scholars. Books and articles on Roman luxury have been primarily concerned with examining the discourse of contemporary writers who criticised luxury;2 analysing the nature of Roman luxury;3 analysing the nature and impact of sumptuary legislation;4 or comparing the luxury of the Romans with that of other cultures.5 The only significant article dealing specifically with the diffusion of luxury is a provocative piece by Andrew Wallace-Hadrill, the focus of which is, however, limited and specific.6 For a series of moralising Roman authors, the second century BC saw the beginning of the corruption of the traditional stern moral fibre, as they saw it, of the Republic by an influx of 1 Roderick Thirkell White’s academic interests are concerned with aspects of the economy of the ancient world, primarily the late Roman Republic and Early Empire, with a focus on consumer and material culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis of the Roman Republic | University of Kent
    09/25/21 Crisis of the Roman Republic | University of Kent Crisis of the Roman Republic View Online 252 items Ancient Rome: from the early Republic to the assassination of Julius Caesar - Matthew Dillon, Lynda Garland, 2005 Book | Core (Must Read) | ch13 Ancient Rome: from the early Republic to the assassination of Julius Caesar - Matthew Dillon, Lynda Garland, 2005 Book | pp600-618 Textbook Recommended Purchase (1 items) The Roman republic - Michael H. Crawford, 1992 Book | Suggested for student purchase Reference Works - Use these rather than Wikipedia or Google (4 items) Look up short entries on people, events, institutions, technical words etc, USE THIS RATHER THAN RANDOM GOOGLE SEARCH OR WIKIPEDIA The Oxford companion to classical civilization - Simon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth, 1998 Book | Core (Must Read) | Excellent reference work that is on-line. Essential to use this! The Oxford classical dictionary - Simon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth, Esther Eidinow, 2012 Book | Core (Must Read) | More extensive version of the Oxford Companion above The Oxford classical dictionary - Simon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth, Esther Eidinow, 2012 Book | Core (Must Read) The Oxford classical dictionary - Simon Hornblower, Antony Spawforth, Esther Eidinow, 2012 Book | Core (Must Read) | More extensive than the Oxford Companion General Bibliography (60 items) We list books in the Templeman Library here that are useful for topics in the module. We do not expect you to read all of them, but list them as alternatives if others are in use. Ancient Sources
    [Show full text]