DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Characterization of the Housatonic River Downstream of Woods Pond

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Characterization of the Housatonic River Downstream of Woods Pond U.S. Environmental Protection Agency New England Region Boston, Massachusetts Ecological Characterization Of The Housatonic River Downstream of Woods Pond September 2002 Environmental Remediation Contract General Electric (GE)/Housatonic River Project Pittsfield, Massachusetts Contract No. DACW33-94-D-0009/032 www.woodlotalt.com Ecological Characterization Of The Housatonic River Downstream of Woods Pond September 2002 Prepared by Woodlot Alternatives, Inc. Topsham, Maine 04086 Prepared under EPA Contract No. DACW33-94-D-0009/032 with Weston Solutions, Inc. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 Boston, Massachusetts TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page SECTION I INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ I-0 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................ I-1 1.1 Purpose of Report......................................................................................... I-1 2.0 Report Organization........................................................................................... I-2 3.0 Relationship to Previous and Ongoing Studies.................................................. I-2 4.0 Literature Cited .................................................................................................. I-4 SECTION II STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION................................................................. II-0 1.0 Introduction....................................................................................................... II-1 2.0 Land Use Patterns and Population Trends........................................................ II-1 2.1 Historical Land Use Patterns and Population Trends.................................. II-1 2.2 Current Land Use Patterns and Population Trends ..................................... II-2 3.0 Biophysical Setting........................................................................................... II-2 3.1 Climate ........................................................................................................ II-3 3.2 Geology ....................................................................................................... II-4 3.2.1 Regional Geological Setting................................................................ II-4 3.2.2 Bedrock Geology................................................................................. II-5 3.2.3 Glacial Geology................................................................................... II-7 3.2.4 Soils..................................................................................................... II-7 3.3 Hydrology.................................................................................................... II-8 3.3.1 Ground Water...................................................................................... II-8 4.0 Literature Cited ............................................................................................... II-10 SECTION III ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION.................................................III-0 Chapter 1 Natural Communities ...................................................................................1-1 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................1-1 2.0 Methods .............................................................................................................1-3 2.1 Background ..................................................................................................1-3 2.2 Literature review ..........................................................................................1-3 2.3 Aerial Photograph Interpretation..................................................................1-4 3.0 Natural Community Descriptions ......................................................................1-4 3.1 Lacustrine Communities ..............................................................................1-4 3.2 Riverine Communities..................................................................................1-5 3.3 Palustrine Communities ...............................................................................1-8 3.4 Terrestrial Communities.............................................................................1-18 4.0 Developed Communities..................................................................................1-26 4.1 Agricultural Lands......................................................................................1-26 4.2 Residential, Commercial, and Public Development...................................1-27 4.3 Transportation ............................................................................................1-27 4.4 Recreational Facilities................................................................................1-28 5.0 Literature Cited ................................................................................................1-29 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Page Chapter 2 Macroinvertebrates.......................................................................................2-1 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................2-1 2.0 Methods .............................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Species:Habitat Association.........................................................................2-1 2.2 Literature Review.........................................................................................2-1 3.0 Aquatic Macroinvertebrates...............................................................................2-2 3.1 Mussels.........................................................................................................2-2 3.2 Dragonflies and Damselflies ........................................................................2-7 3.3 Benthic Macroinvertebrates .......................................................................2-10 4.0 Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Macroinvertebrates..................................2-17 5.0 Literature Cited ................................................................................................2-25 Chapter 3 Fish...............................................................................................................3-1 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................3-1 2.0 Methods .............................................................................................................3-1 2.1 Species:Habitat Association.........................................................................3-1 2.2 Existing Fisheries Data.................................................................................3-2 3.0 Fish Community Description.............................................................................3-5 4.0 Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Fish ............................................................3-6 5.0 Literature Cited ..................................................................................................3-8 Chapter 4 Reptiles and Amphibians .............................................................................4-1 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................4-1 2.0 Methods .............................................................................................................4-1 2.1 Species:Habitat Association.........................................................................4-1 3.0 Reptile and Amphibian Community Descriptions.............................................4-2 3.1 Reptiles.........................................................................................................4-2 3.1.1 Lizards..................................................................................................4-2 3.1.2 Snakes...................................................................................................4-3 3.1.3 Turtles...................................................................................................4-5 3.2 Amphibians ..................................................................................................4-6 3.2.1 Toads and Frogs ...................................................................................4-7 3.2.2 Salamanders .........................................................................................4-9 4.0 Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Reptiles and Amphibians.........................4-14 4.1 Reptiles.......................................................................................................4-14 4.2 Amphibians ................................................................................................4-17 5.0 Literature Cited ................................................................................................4-21 Chapter 5 Birds .............................................................................................................5-1 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................5-1 2.0 Methods .............................................................................................................5-1 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Page 3.0 Bird Community Description.............................................................................5-1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Botanical Survey of Bussey Brook Meadow Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
    Botanical Survey of Bussey Brook Meadow Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts Botanical Survey of Bussey Brook Meadow Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts New England Wildflower Society 180 Hemenway Road Framingham, MA 01701 508-877-7630 www.newfs.org Report by Joy VanDervort-Sneed, Atkinson Conservation Fellow and Ailene Kane, Plant Conservation Volunteer Coordinator Prepared for the Arboretum Park Conservancy Funded by the Arnold Arboretum Committee 2 Conducted 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................4 METHODS....................................................................................................................................6 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................8 Plant Species ........................................................................................................................8 Natural Communities...........................................................................................................9 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................15 Recommendations for Management ..................................................................................15 Recommendations for Education and Interpretation .........................................................17 Acknowledgments..............................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, the Presence of Homoeoneuria S.S. (Ephemeroptera
    Zootaxa 2146: 53–60 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The presence of Homoeoneuria s.s. (Ephemeroptera: Oligoneuriidae) in South America with the description of a new species F.F. SALLES1, C.N. FRANCISCHETTI2 & E.D.G. SOARES3 1Depto. de Ciências da Saúde, Biológicas e Agrárias, Centro Universitário Norte do Espírito Santo, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, CEP 29.933-415, São Mateus, ES, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] 2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Laboratório de Ecologia de Comunidades, Depto. de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, CEP 36.570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] 3Depto. de Ciências da Saúde, Biológicas e Agrárias, Centro Universitário Norte do Espírito Santo, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, CEP 29.933-415, São Mateus, ES, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In the present work a new species of Homoeoneuria is described based on nymphs and adults from Southeastern Brazil. Based on cladistics, the new species belongs to the subgenus Homoeoneuria.s.s. Homoeoneuria (H). watu sp. n., besides being the second species of the genus reported from South America, is the first representative of the subgenus from the region. The new species can be distinguished from the other described species of the genus by the following combination of characters: In the adult stage, (1) pronotum with prominent posteromedian pale yellow spot almost reaching anterior margin; (2) abdominal color pattern; (3) shape of penes. In the nymph, (1) head heavily washed with brownish-orange between compound eyes and ocelli; (2) antennal pedicels with short, thick setae; (3) small paired tubercles present on vertex and anterior margin of pronotum; (4) galea-lacinia of maxillae with submarginal row of 20–21 long, spinous setae; (5) abdominal color pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia County Ground Beetle Species (There May Be Some Dutchess County Floodplain Forest Records Still Included)
    Columbia County Ground Beetle Species (There may be some Dutchess County floodplain forest records still included). Anisodactylus nigerrimus Amara aenea Apristus latens Acupalpus canadensis Amara angustata Apristus subsulcatus Acupalpus partiarius Amara angustatoides Asaphidion curtum Acupalpus pauperculus Amara apricaria Badister neopulchellus Acupalpus pumilus Amara avida Badister notatus Acupalpus rectangulus Amara chalcea Badister ocularis Agonum aeruginosum Amara communis Badister transversus Agonum affine Amara crassispina Bembidion Agonum canadense Amara cupreolata Bembidion aenulum Agonum corvus Amara exarata Bembidion affine Agonum cupripenne Amara familiaris Bembidion antiquum Agonum errans Amara flebilis Bembidion basicorne Agonum extensicolle Amara lunicollis Bembidion carolinense Agonum ferreum Amara neoscotica Bembidion castor Agonum fidele Amara otiosa Bembidion chalceum Agonum galvestonicum Amara ovata Bembidion cheyennense Agonum gratiosum Amara pennsylvanica Bembidion frontale Agonum harrisii Amara rubrica Bembidion immaturum Agonum lutulentum Amara sp Bembidion impotens Agonum melanarium Amphasia interstitialis Bembidion inaequale Agonum metallescens Anatrichis minuta Bembidion incrematum Agonum moerens Anisodactylus discoideus Bembidion inequale Agonum muelleri Anisodactylus harrisii Bembidion lacunarium Agonum mutatum Anisodactylus kirbyi Bembidion levetei Agonum palustre Anisodactylus nigrita Bembidion louisella Agonum picicornoides Anisodactylus pseudagricola Bembidion mimus Agonum propinquum Anisodactylus rusticus
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report110
    ~ ~ WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A Survey of Rare and Endangered Mayflies of Selected RESEARCH Rivers of Wisconsin by Richard A. Lillie REPORT110 Bureau of Research, Monona December 1995 ~ Abstract The mayfly fauna of 25 rivers and streams in Wisconsin were surveyed during 1991-93 to document the temporal and spatial occurrence patterns of two state endangered mayflies, Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex. Both species are candidates under review for addition to the federal List of Endang­ ered and Threatened Wildlife. Based on previous records of occur­ rence in Wisconsin, sampling was conducted during the period May-July using a combination of sampling methods, including dredges, air-lift pumps, kick-nets, and hand-picking of substrates. No specimens of Anepeorus simplex were collected. Three specimens (nymphs or larvae) of Acanthametropus pecatonica were found in the Black River, one nymph was collected from the lower Wisconsin River, and a partial exuviae was collected from the Chippewa River. Homoeoneuria ammophila was recorded from Wisconsin waters for the first time from the Black River and Sugar River. New site distribution records for the following Wiscon­ sin special concern species include: Macdunnoa persimplex, Metretopus borealis, Paracloeodes minutus, Parameletus chelifer, Pentagenia vittigera, Cercobrachys sp., and Pseudiron centra/is. Collection of many of the aforementioned species from large rivers appears to be dependent upon sampling sand-bottomed substrates at frequent intervals, as several species were relatively abundant during only very short time spans. Most species were associated with sand substrates in water < 2 m deep. Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex should continue to be listed as endangered for state purposes and receive a biological rarity ranking of critically imperiled (S1 ranking), and both species should be considered as candidates proposed for listing as endangered or threatened as defined by the Endangered Species Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Greatest Conservation Need 2015 Wildlife Action Plan
    RHODE ISLAND SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED 2015 WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN RI SGCN 2015 (454) Contents SGCN Mammals ............................................................................................................................. 2 SGCN Birds .................................................................................................................................... 3 SGCN Herptofauna ......................................................................................................................... 6 SGCN Fish ...................................................................................................................................... 7 SGCN Invertebrates ........................................................................................................................ 9 1 RHODE ISLAND SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED 2015 WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN SGCN Mammals (21) Scientific Name Common Name Balaenoptera physalus Fin Whale Eptesicus fuscus Big Brown Bat Eubalaena glacialis North Atlantic Right Whale Lasionycteris noctivagans Silver-haired Bat Lasiurus borealis Eastern Red Bat Lasiurus cinereus Hoary Bat Lynx rufus Bobcat Megaptera novaeangliae Humpback Whale Microtus pennsylvanicus provectus Block Island Meadow Vole Myotis leibii Eastern Small-footed Myotis Myotis lucifugus Little Brown Myotis Myotis septentrionalis Northern Long-eared Bat Perimyotis subflavus Tri-colored Bat Phoca vitulina Harbor Seal Phocoena phocoena Harbor Porpoise Scalopus aquaticus Eastern Mole Sorex (Otisorex) fumeus Smoky
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Strea
    Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Streambed Sediment in the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins, 1992-94 By Robert F. Breault and Sandra L. Harris Abstract exceed sediment-quality guidelines over a wider geographical area, although usually by lower Streambed-sediment samples were collected ratios of contaminant concentration to sediment- in 1992-94 at selected sites in the Connecticut, quality guideline than the organic compounds. Housatonic, and Thames River Basins to determine the geographical distribution of trace elements and organic compounds and their INTRODUCTION potential for adverse biological effects on aquatic organisms. Chromium, copper, lead, mercury, The Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins study unit is one of 59 National Water-Quality nickel, zinc, chlordane, DDT, PAHs, and PCBs Assessment (NAWQA) study units nationwide. The were detected in samples from throughout the study unit drainage basin comprises an area of almost basins, but concentrations of these constituents 16,000 mi2 and extends through parts of the Province of generally were lowest in the northern forested Quebec, Canada, eastern Vermont, western New Hamp- drainage basins and highest in the southern shire, west-central Massachusetts, nearly all of Connect- urbanized drainage basins of Springfield, icut, and small parts of New York and Rhode Island. Massachusetts, and Hartford, New Haven and The study unit is entirely within the New Bridgeport, Connecticut. Possible anthropogenic England Physiographic Province (Fenneman, 1938), a sources of these contaminants include industrial plateau-like upland that rises gradually from the sea but effluent; municipal wastewater; runoff from includes numerous mountain ranges and individual agricultural, urban and forested areas; and peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkshire National Fish Hatchery Draft Recreational Fishing Plan and EA
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Berkshire National Fish Hatchery Draft Recreational Fishing Plan March 2020 Berkshire National Fish Hatchery Draft Recreational Fishing Plan March 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Berkshire National Fish Hatchery 240 Hatchery Road New Marlborough, MA 01230 Submitted: Project Leader Date Concurrence: Complex Manager Date Approved: Assistant Regional Director, Fish and Aquatic Conservation Date Berkshire National Fish Hatchery Draft Recreational Fishing Plan 2 Recreational Fishing Plan Table of Contents I. Introduction 4 II. Statement Of Objectives 5 III. Description of Fishing Program 6 A. Areas to be Opened to Fishing 6 B. Species to be Taken, Fishing Seasons, Fishing Access 6 C. Fishing Permit Requirements 6 D. Consultation and Coordination with the State 7 E. Law Enforcement 7 F. Funding and Staff Requirements 7 IV. Conduct of the Fishing Program 8 A. Angler Permit Application, Selection, and/or Registration Procedures 8 B. Hatchery-Specific Fishing Regulations 8 C. Relevant State Regulations 9 D. Other Hatchery Rules and Regulations for Fishing 9 V. Public Engagement 9 A. Outreach for Announcing and Publicizing the Fishing Program 9 B. Anticipated Public Reaction to the Fishing Program 9 C. How Anglers Will Be Informed of Relevant Rules and Regulations 10 VI. Compatibility Determination 10 VII. References 10 VIII. Figures 11 Environmental Assessment 12 Berkshire National Fish Hatchery Draft Recreational Fishing Plan 3 I. Introduction Berkshire National Fish Hatchery (NFH) is part of the U.S. Fish and
    [Show full text]
  • Final Amendment to the Restoration Plan
    Final Amendment to the Housatonic River Basin Final Natural Resources Restoration Plan, Environmental Assessment, and Environmental Impact Evaluation for Connecticut May 2013 State of Connecticut, Department of Energy and Environmental Protection United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 7 2.1 No Action Alternative ........................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Proposed Preferred Alternative ............................................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Power Line Marsh Restoration ...................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Long Beach West Tidal Marsh Restoration ................................................................. 10 2.2.3 Pin Shop Pond Dam Removal...................................................................................... 12 2.2.4 Old Papermill Pond Dam Removal Feasibility Study ................................................. 15 2.2.5 Housatonic Watershed Habitat Continuity in Northwest Connecticut ........................ 18 2.2.6 Tingue Dam Fish Passage ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Confirmation of the North American Leech Placobdella Ornata (Verrill, 1872) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) in Europe
    BioInvasions Records (2015) Volume 4, Issue 3: 185–188 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2015.4.3.05 © 2015 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2015 REABIC Rapid Communication Molecular confirmation of the North American leech Placobdella ornata (Verrill, 1872) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) in Europe Jan Soors1*, Joost Mertens2, William E. Moser3, Dennis J. Richardson4, Charlotte I. Hammond4 and Eric A. Lazo-Wasem5 1Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Kliniekstraat 25, 1070 Brussels, Belgium 2Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij (VMM), Raymonde de Larochelaan 1, 9051 Sint-Denijs-Westrem, Belgium 3Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Museum Support Center MRC 534, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746 USA 4School of Biological Sciences, Quinnipiac University, 275 Mt. Carmel Avenue, Hamden, Connecticut 06518 USA 5Division of Invertebrate Zoology, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208118, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 USA E-mail: [email protected] (JS), [email protected] (JM), [email protected] (WEM), [email protected] (DJR), [email protected] (CIH), [email protected] (EALW) *Corresponding author Received: 28 January 2015 / Accepted: 15 May 2015 / Published online: 12 June 2015 Handling editor: Vadim Panov Abstract Specimens of the North American leech, Placobdella ornata (Verrill, 1872) were confirmed from the Donkmeer, a freshwater lake in the province of East Flanders, Belgium, by morphological and molecular analysis. Leech specimens from Belgium were morphologically consistent with the syntype series and description of P. ornata by Verrill (1872). Molecular comparison of the Belgian specimens to specimens of P. ornata from the type locality (New Haven, Connecticut, USA) using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene revealed a similarity of 99.5%.
    [Show full text]
  • Rvk-Diss Digi
    University of Groningen Of dwarves and giants van Klink, Roel IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Klink, R. (2014). Of dwarves and giants: How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 01-10-2021 Of Dwarves and Giants How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes Roel van Klink This PhD-project was carried out at the Community and Conservation Ecology group, which is part of the Centre for Ecological and Environmental Studies of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Entomologist
    - Vol. 3'3, No.3 & 4 Fall/Winter 2000 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST PUBLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volume 33 No. 3-4 ISSN 0090-0222 TABLE OF CONTENTS New distribution record for the endangered crawling water beetle, Brychius hungerfordi (Coleoptera: Haliplidael ond notes on seasonal abundance and food preferences Michael Grant, Robert Vande Kopple and Bert Ebbers . ............... 165 Arhyssus hirtus in Minnesota: The inland occurrence of an east coast species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: RhopalidaeJ John D. Laftin and John Haarstad .. 169 Seasonol occurrence of the sod webworm moths (lepidoptera: Crambidoe) of Ohio Harry D. Niemczk, David 1. Shetlar, Kevin T. Power and Douglas S. Richmond. ... 173 Leucanthiza dircella (lepidoptera: Gracillariidae): A leafminer of leatherwood, Dirca pa/us/tis Toby R. Petriee, Robert A Haack, William J. Mattson and Bruce A. Birr. 187 New distribution records of ground beetles from the north-central United States (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Foster Forbes Purrington, Daniel K. Young, Kirk 1. lorsen and Jana Chin-Ting lee .......... 199 Libel/ula flavida (Odonata: libellulidoe], a dragonfly new to Ohio Tom D. Schultz. ... 205 Distribution of first instar gypsy moths [lepidoptera: Lymantriidae] among saplings of common Great Lakes understory species 1. l. and J. A. Witter ....... 209 Comparison of two population sampling methods used in field life history studies of Mesovelia mulsonti (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha: Mesoveliidae) in southern Illinois Steven J. Taylor and J. E McPherson ..... .. 223 COVER PHOTO Scudderio furcata Brunner von Wattenwyl (Tettigoniidae], the forktailed bush katydid. Photo taken in Huron Mountains, MI by M. F. O'Brien.
    [Show full text]