DOCSLIB.ORG

Quantum Vacuum Energy and the Casimir Effect

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quantum Vacuum Energy and the Casimir Effect Quantum vacuum energy and the Casimir effect Author: Guim Aguad´eGorgori´o Facultat de F´ısica, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.∗ (Dated: January 15, 2014) Abstract: An overview of the Casimir effect is presented. The area of study is historically introduced, together with a basic presentation on the zero-point energy concept in relation with the quantization of fields. After this, the Casimir force between parallel plates is calculated under two different regularization schemes. The brief overview is completed with a compilation of experimental results and implications of the effect in different fields of physics. I. INTRODUCTION for which the energy at lowest temperature was a non- zero term hν=2. This was the beginning of the concept of It was 65 years ago when Hendrik Casimir published a zero-point energy, as the lowest possible energy quantum short paper [1] on the attraction force between two par- state being different from zero. allel conducting plates due to changes in the quantum In ordinary quantum mechanical systems, the not-null electromagnetic zero-point energy, known as the Casimir ground state may be seen as a consequence of the Heisen- effect. berg uncertainty principle, with the energy of the har- The concept of zero point energy had been a hot topic monic oscillator being its clearest example. The term since it appeared in the Planck's black-body radiation quantum vacuum, although considered equivalent, was discussion by Einstein and Stern; a 1913 article on the coined as a result of the concept of ground state energy energy of an hydrogen gas at low temperature, which con- within the framework of quantum field theory. cluded that a non-zero residual energy at T = 0 might Quantization of fields begins on the postulates of quan- exist [2]. tum mechanics, replacing the pair [x; p] by the field In the following decades, the work by Casimir remained '(x; t) and conjugate canonical momentum πi = @L=@'_i. relatively unknown, probably because of controversy on In the one-dimensional case (by means of what is known the value of the ground state of quantum vacuum energy, as second-quantization), a quantized string (0; a) is con- which was commonly redefined to zero. It was not un- sidered as a set of quantum harmonic oscillators as til the 70s when experiments started to became precise X − + + enough to measure the Casimir force and assure its exis- '(t; x) = an'n (t; x) + an 'n (t; x) (2) tence as evident. n Nowadays, the Casimir effect together with quantum with '± being the solutions of the usual wave equa- vacuum energy is again highly popular in the scope of n tion. The annihilation and creation operators a ; a+ QFT, together with a set of different applications and n n are those obeying the commutation relations of QM (or consequences that may go from cosmology to nanotech- anti-commutation relations for 1/2-spin particles), and nology. so the quantum state is defined by a j0i = 0. Even In the following sections, the basics of zero-point en- n though quantum field theory is a giant and expanding ergy in QED are introduced, followed by a first calcula- field of physics, we may particularly center in our one- tion of the Casimir force and a brief overview of infinite dimensional example to study the energy of this vacuum integrals regularization. A bibliographical compilation j0i state. of experiments and applications of the Casimir effect is The 00-th component of the energy-momentum ten- presented. sor is the operator for the energy density, and so what we are basically looking for in the present article is to II. ZERO-POINT ENERGY AND FIELD understand QUANTIZATION Z vacuum E0 = h0jT00(x)j0idx: (3) During the first decades of the last century, and in the beginnings of quantum theory, a paper by Einstein and By looking at appendix VI.A, we observe the form of Stern [2] on the basis of Planck's previous work stated h0jT00(x)j0i in free or bounded states. It is important to that the energy of a vibrating unit was remark that this expressions are in terms of sums or in- tegrals over all possible frequency values, which we must hν hν not confuse with the integrals among space. The results = hν + (1) e kT − 1 2 for bounded and free-space energies are a Z 1 bounded ~ X E0 (a) = h0jT00(x)j0idx = !n; (4) ∗ 2 Electronic address: [email protected] 0 n=1 Quantum Vacuum Energy and the Casimir Effect Guim Aguad´eGorgori´o 1 L Z equivalence between using the Euler-Maclaurin and the Efree(−∞; 1) = ~ ! dk; (5) 0 2π k Abel-Plana formulae to proceed with the damping regu- 0 larization, together with the usefulness of the Abel-Plana formula to understand the independence of the damping (where L ! 1), and their respective frequencies (for function. a massless field) πn !bounded = c ; n = 1; 2; :::; (6) n a B. Regularizations of the ultraviolet divergence !free = ck; − 1 < k < 1: (7) The damping function regularization appears by a k physical intuition process. As the conducting plates be- This is, at a basic point, enough information to ap- come transparent to high-frequency waves, the contribu- proach the comprehension of the vacuum energy of the tion of these to the physical result may be supressed by electromagnetic field. the use of a damping exponential function ZZ 1 ~ dk1dk2 X −δ! E (a; δ) = S ! e k?;n : (11) III. THE CASIMIR EFFECT 0 2 (2π)2 k?;n n=−∞ A. The quantized electromagnetic field between plates The expression is finite for δ > 0 and regularization will give the correct result in the limit of δ ! 0. If we remove the plates, the regularized vacuum energy in As mentioned in the introduction, the Casimir effect the same interval (0; a) accounts from changing L ! 1 results from the changes of the presented QED zero-point to L = a energy due to external conditions. In this case, the pres- ence of two perfectly conducting parallel plates deter- ZZZ Efree(a; δ) = aS ~ d3k! e−δ!k S: (12) mines a boundary condition, and so the frequencies of 0 (2π)3 k the radiation between the plates are restricted to a dis- crete set of values. With these, we may write the regularized potential en- On the surface S of a perfect conductor, both polar- ergy of the system, i.e. the energy to bring the plates izations Ek and H? are zero, and so the existence of two from a large separation to a, as plates with area S ! 1 and separation z = a quantizes the possible frequencies in the three dimensional case to ren bounded free U0 (a) = lim E0 (a; δ) − E0 (a; δ) (13) r δ!0 πn2 ! = ! = c k2 + k2 + n = 0; 1; 2::: (8) k?;n 1 2 2 2 2 a As in [3], we use k? = k1 + k2 and t = ak3/π. The . expression to evaluate is then Now, by the same process done in II and appendix 1 VI.A, we just need to take the three-dimensional case to c π ZZ dk dk ren ~ 1 2 X −δ!k ;n obtain the vacuum energy U0 (a) = S lim F (n)e ? a δ!0 (2π)2 n=0 1 ZZZ ZZ 1 3 ~ 1 X Z ! E0 = d x dk1dk2 !k ;n: (9) k?a (2π)2 2a ? − dtF (t)e−δ!k − (14) n=1 2π 0 Integrating dxdy in area S and dz in [0; a], with ZZ 1 ~ dk1dk2 X E0(a) = S !k ;n; (10) v 2 (2π)2 ? u !2 n=−∞ u k a F (x) = t ? + x2: (15) where the sum has been extended as to account the π two photon polarizations when n 6= 0. This expression diverges for large photon momentum We can now recognize the difference between the sum k. This ultraviolet divergence is a common problem in and the integral as a common and useful expression. We QFT, and it is treated through regularization. In the may first evaluate it by the Abel-Plana formula, and following I will introduce two different regularizations to through this recognize the independence of the damp- achieve the Casimir force result. These are the damping ing function f(!k?;n; δ) used in Casimir's assumption to function (as originally used by Casimir [1]) and the zeta compute (13) by the Euler-Maclaurin formula. function regularizations. In addition, I will present the Applying the Abel-Plana formula on (14) and using Treball de Fi de Grau 2 Quantum Vacuum Energy and the Casimir Effect Guim Aguad´eGorgori´o y = k?a/πwe obtain (see Appendix VI.B) Before going on to conclusions, a completely different regularization process is presented. This is the zeta func- 1 t tion regularization. It is a much modern, commonly used c π2 Z dt Z ren ~ p 2 2 process in QFT, based on the analytic continuation of the U0 (a) = −S 3 2πt y t − y dy a e − 1 Riemann zeta function ζ(s). y 0 We rewrite (10) with a new regularization parameter c π2 = − ~ S: (16) s as 720a3 1 ZZ ~ X dk1dk2 1−2s The force between the plates is the derivative of the E0(a; s) = S ! : (20) 2 (2π)2 k?;n potential energy with respect to their distance n=−∞ @U ren(a) π2 c As in [3], we use polar coordinates and k = y(πn=a) F (a) = − 0 = − ~ S: (17) ? @a 240 a4 to obtain (Appendix VI.D) This is the Casimir force between two parallel conduct- 1 3−2s Z 1 −s 1 ! c 2 X πn ing plates due to QED vacuum energy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantum Vacuum Energy Density and Unifying Perspectives Between Gravity and Quantum Behaviour of Matter
    Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 42, numéro 2, 2017 251 Quantum vacuum energy density and unifying perspectives between gravity and quantum behaviour of matter Davide Fiscalettia, Amrit Sorlib aSpaceLife Institute, S. Lorenzo in Campo (PU), Italy corresponding author, email: [email protected] bSpaceLife Institute, S. Lorenzo in Campo (PU), Italy Foundations of Physics Institute, Idrija, Slovenia email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A model of a three-dimensional quantum vacuum based on Planck energy density as a universal property of a granular space is suggested. This model introduces the possibility to interpret gravity and the quantum behaviour of matter as two different aspects of the same origin. The change of the quantum vacuum energy density can be considered as the fundamental medium which determines a bridge between gravity and the quantum behaviour, leading to new interest- ing perspectives about the problem of unifying gravity with quantum theory. PACS numbers: 04. ; 04.20-q ; 04.50.Kd ; 04.60.-m. Key words: general relativity, three-dimensional space, quantum vac- uum energy density, quantum mechanics, generalized Klein-Gordon equation for the quantum vacuum energy density, generalized Dirac equation for the quantum vacuum energy density. 1 Introduction The standard interpretation of phenomena in gravitational fields is in terms of a fundamentally curved space-time. However, this approach leads to well known problems if one aims to find a unifying picture which takes into account some basic aspects of the quantum theory. For this reason, several authors advocated different ways in order to treat gravitational interaction, in which the space-time manifold can be considered as an emergence of the deepest processes situated at the fundamental level of quantum gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiral Gauge Theories Revisited
    CERN-TH/2001-031 Chiral gauge theories revisited Lectures given at the International School of Subnuclear Physics Erice, 27 August { 5 September 2000 Martin L¨uscher ∗ CERN, Theory Division CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Contents 1. Introduction 2. Chiral gauge theories & the gauge anomaly 3. The regularization problem 4. Weyl fermions from 4+1 dimensions 5. The Ginsparg–Wilson relation 6. Gauge-invariant lattice regularization of anomaly-free theories 1. Introduction A characteristic feature of the electroweak interactions is that the left- and right- handed components of the fermion fields do not couple to the gauge fields in the same way. The term chiral gauge theory is reserved for field theories of this type, while all other gauge theories (such as QCD) are referred to as vector-like, since the gauge fields only couple to vector currents in this case. At first sight the difference appears to be mathematically insignificant, but it turns out that in many respects chiral ∗ On leave from Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany 1 νµ ν e µ W W γ e Fig. 1. Feynman diagram contributing to the muon decay at two-loop order of the electroweak interactions. The triangular subdiagram in this example is potentially anomalous and must be treated with care to ensure that gauge invariance is preserved. gauge theories are much more complicated. Their definition beyond the classical level, for example, is already highly non-trivial and it is in general extremely difficult to obtain any solid information about their non-perturbative properties. 1.1 Anomalies Most of the peculiarities in chiral gauge theories are related to the fact that the gauge symmetry tends to be violated by quantum effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Regularization and Renormalization of Non-Perturbative Quantum Electrodynamics Via the Dyson-Schwinger Equations
    University of Adelaide School of Chemistry and Physics Doctor of Philosophy Regularization and Renormalization of Non-Perturbative Quantum Electrodynamics via the Dyson-Schwinger Equations by Tom Sizer Supervisors: Professor A. G. Williams and Dr A. Kızılers¨u March 2014 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction................................... 1 1.2 Dyson-SchwingerEquations . .. .. 2 1.3 Renormalization................................. 4 1.4 Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking . 5 1.5 ChapterOutline................................. 5 1.6 Notation..................................... 7 2 Canonical QED 9 2.1 Canonically Quantized QED . 9 2.2 FeynmanRules ................................. 12 2.3 Analysis of Divergences & Weinberg’s Theorem . 14 2.4 ElectronPropagatorandSelf-Energy . 17 2.5 PhotonPropagatorandPolarizationTensor . 18 2.6 ProperVertex.................................. 20 2.7 Ward-TakahashiIdentity . 21 2.8 Skeleton Expansion and Dyson-Schwinger Equations . 22 2.9 Renormalization................................. 25 2.10 RenormalizedPerturbationTheory . 27 2.11 Outline Proof of Renormalizability of QED . 28 3 Functional QED 31 3.1 FullGreen’sFunctions ............................. 31 3.2 GeneratingFunctionals............................. 33 3.3 AbstractDyson-SchwingerEquations . 34 3.4 Connected and One-Particle Irreducible Green’s Functions . 35 3.5 Euclidean Field Theory . 39 3.6 QEDviaFunctionalIntegrals . 40 3.7 Regularization.................................. 42 3.7.1 Cutoff Regularization . 42 3.7.2 Pauli-Villars Regularization . 42 i 3.7.3 Lattice Regularization . 43 3.7.4 Dimensional Regularization . 44 3.8 RenormalizationoftheDSEs ......................... 45 3.9 RenormalizationGroup............................. 49 3.10BrokenScaleInvariance ............................ 53 4 The Choice of Vertex 55 4.1 Unrenormalized Quenched Formalism . 55 4.2 RainbowQED.................................. 57 4.2.1 Self-Energy Derivations . 58 4.2.2 Analytic Approximations . 60 4.2.3 Numerical Solutions . 62 4.3 Rainbow QED with a 4-Fermion Interaction .
    [Show full text]
  • A Final Cure to the Tribulations of the Vacuum in Quantum Theory Joseph Jean-Claude
    A Final Cure to the Tribulations of the Vacuum in Quantum Theory Joseph Jean-Claude To cite this version: Joseph Jean-Claude. A Final Cure to the Tribulations of the Vacuum in Quantum Theory. 2019. hal-01991699 HAL Id: hal-01991699 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01991699 Preprint submitted on 24 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A Final Cure to the Tribulations of the Vacuum in Quantum Theory Joseph J. JEAN-CLAUDE April 16, 2017 - Revision I (Jan-2019) © Copyright [email protected] Abstract Quantum Field Theory seems to be of late anything but unraveling, apparently shifting from crisis to crisis. Undeniably, there seems to be running, for many different reasons, a rampant discomfort with the Standard Model, an extension of QFT aiming at complementing it. Prior to the latest supersymmetry upset, what has been known as the “vacuum castastrophe” or the “cosmological constant problem” resoundingly shook the very foundations of the Theory. Effectively the enormous numeric disparity between its predicted value of the vacuum energy density, an element of utmost significance in the Theory, and the measured value of this quantity from a Relativistic approach has prompted some to qualify this mishap as the biggest predictive failure of any Theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Vacuum Energy Density E
    Estimating the Vacuum Energy Density E. Margan Estimating the Vacuum Energy Density - an Overview of Possible Scenarios Erik Margan Experimental Particle Physics Department, “Jožef Stefan” Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia 1. Introduction There are several different indications that the vacuum energy density should be non-zero, each indication being based either on laboratory experiments or on astronomical observations. These include the Planck’s radiation law, the spontaneous emission of a photon by a particle in an excited state, the Casimir’s effect, the van der Waals’ bonds, the Lamb’s shift, the Davies–Unruh’s effect, the measurements of the apparent luminosity against the spectral red shift of supernovae type Ia, and more. However, attempts to find the way to measure or to calculate the value of the vacuum energy density have all either failed or produced results incompatible with observations or other confirmed theoretical results. Some of those results are theoretically implausible because of certain unrealistic assumptions on which the calculation model is based. And some theoretical results are in conflict with observations, the conflict itself being caused by certain questionable hypotheses on which the theory is based. And the best experimental evidence (the Casimir’s effect) is based on the measurement of the difference of energy density within and outside of the measuring apparatus, thus preventing in principle any numerical assessment of the actual energy density. This article presents an overview of the most important estimation methods. - 1 - Estimating the Vacuum Energy Density E. Margan - 2 - Estimating the Vacuum Energy Density E. Margan 2. Planck’s Theoretical Vacuum Energy Density The energy density of the quantum vacuum fluctuations has been estimated shortly after Max Planck (1900-1901) [1] published his findings of the spectral distribution of the ideal thermodynamic black body radiation and its dependence on the temperature of the radiating black body.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0812.3578V2 [Hep-Ph] 20 Aug 2017 A
    arXiv:0812.357 Regularization, Renormalization, and Dimensional Analysis: Dimensional Regularization Meets Freshman E&M ∗ Fredrick Olness & Randall Scalise Department of Physics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275-0175, U.S.A. (Dated: August 22, 2017) We illustrate the dimensional regularization (DR) technique using a simple problem from elementary electrostatics. This example illustrates the virtues of DR without the complications of a full quan- tum field theory calculation. We contrast the DR approach with the cutoff regularization approach, and demonstrate that DR preserves the translational symmetry. We then introduce a Minimal Sub- traction (MS) and a Modified Minimal Subtraction (MS) scheme to renormalize the result. Finally, we consider dimensional transmutation as encountered in the case of compact extra-dimensions. PACS numbers: 11.30.-j Symmetry and conservation laws 11.10.Kk Field theories in dimensions other than four 11.15.-q Gauge field theories 11.10.Gh Renormalization Keywords: Renormalization, Dimensional Regularization, Regularization, Gauge Symmetries Contents VI. Renormalization 6 A. Connection to QFT 6 I. Dimensional Regularization 2 VII. The Renormalization Group Equation 6 A. Introduction and Motivation 2 A. Physical Observables: 6 B. Relating Perturbative & Non-Perturbative II. Dimension Analysis: The Pythagorean Functions 7 Theorem 2 VIII. Extra Dimensions 7 III. An Infinite Line of Charge 3 A. E and V in arbitrary dimensions 7 A. Statement of the Problem 3 B. Scale invariance: 3 IX. Conclusions 8 IV. Cutoff Regularization: 4 Acknowledgment 8 arXiv:0812.3578v2 [hep-ph] 20 Aug 2017 A. Cutoff Regularization Computation 4 X. Appendix 8 B. Computation of E and δV 4 A. 3-Dimensions 8 C.
    [Show full text]
  • New Varying Speed of Light Theories
    New varying speed of light theories Jo˜ao Magueijo The Blackett Laboratory,Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine South Kensington, London SW7 2BZ, UK ABSTRACT We review recent work on the possibility of a varying speed of light (VSL). We start by discussing the physical meaning of a varying c, dispelling the myth that the constancy of c is a matter of logical consistency. We then summarize the main VSL mechanisms proposed so far: hard breaking of Lorentz invariance; bimetric theories (where the speeds of gravity and light are not the same); locally Lorentz invariant VSL theories; theories exhibiting a color dependent speed of light; varying c induced by extra dimensions (e.g. in the brane-world scenario); and field theories where VSL results from vacuum polarization or CPT violation. We show how VSL scenarios may solve the cosmological problems usually tackled by inflation, and also how they may produce a scale-invariant spectrum of Gaussian fluctuations, capable of explaining the WMAP data. We then review the connection between VSL and theories of quantum gravity, showing how “doubly special” relativity has emerged as a VSL effective model of quantum space-time, with observational implications for ultra high energy cosmic rays and gamma ray bursts. Some recent work on the physics of “black” holes and other compact objects in VSL theories is also described, highlighting phenomena associated with spatial (as opposed to temporal) variations in c. Finally we describe the observational status of the theory. The evidence is slim – redshift dependence in alpha, ultra high energy cosmic rays, and (to a much lesser extent) the acceleration of the universe and the WMAP data.
    [Show full text]
  • Path Integral in Quantum Field Theory Alexander Belyaev (Course Based on Lectures by Steven King) Contents
    Path Integral in Quantum Field Theory Alexander Belyaev (course based on Lectures by Steven King) Contents 1 Preliminaries 5 1.1 Review of Classical Mechanics of Finite System . 5 1.2 Review of Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics . 7 1.3 Relativistic Quantum Mechanics . 14 1.3.1 Relativistic Conventions and Notation . 14 1.3.2 TheKlein-GordonEquation . 15 1.4 ProblemsSet1 ........................... 18 2 The Klein-Gordon Field 19 2.1 Introduction............................. 19 2.2 ClassicalScalarFieldTheory . 20 2.3 QuantumScalarFieldTheory . 28 2.4 ProblemsSet2 ........................... 35 3 Interacting Klein-Gordon Fields 37 3.1 Introduction............................. 37 3.2 PerturbationandScatteringTheory. 37 3.3 TheInteractionHamiltonian. 43 3.4 Example: K π+π− ....................... 45 S → 3.5 Wick’s Theorem, Feynman Propagator, Feynman Diagrams . .. 47 3.6 TheLSZReductionFormula. 52 3.7 ProblemsSet3 ........................... 58 4 Transition Rates and Cross-Sections 61 4.1 TransitionRates .......................... 61 4.2 TheNumberofFinalStates . 63 4.3 Lorentz Invariant Phase Space (LIPS) . 63 4.4 CrossSections............................ 64 4.5 Two-bodyScattering . 65 4.6 DecayRates............................. 66 4.7 OpticalTheorem .......................... 66 4.8 ProblemsSet4 ........................... 68 1 2 CONTENTS 5 Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics 69 5.1 Introduction............................. 69 5.2 The Point to Point Transition Amplitude . 70 5.3 ImaginaryTime........................... 74 5.4 Transition Amplitudes With an External Driving Force . ... 77 5.5 Expectation Values of Heisenberg Position Operators . .... 81 5.6 Appendix .............................. 83 5.6.1 GaussianIntegration . 83 5.6.2 Functionals ......................... 85 5.7 ProblemsSet5 ........................... 87 6 Path Integral Quantisation of the Klein-Gordon Field 89 6.1 Introduction............................. 89 6.2 TheFeynmanPropagator(again) . 91 6.3 Green’s Functions in Free Field Theory .
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem
    The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem S.E. Rugh∗and H. Zinkernagely To appear in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Abstract - The cosmological constant problem arises at the intersection be- tween general relativity and quantum field theory, and is regarded as a fun- damental problem in modern physics. In this paper we describe the historical and conceptual origin of the cosmological constant problem which is intimately connected to the vacuum concept in quantum field theory. We critically dis- cuss how the problem rests on the notion of physically real vacuum energy, and which relations between general relativity and quantum field theory are assumed in order to make the problem well-defined. 1. Introduction Is empty space really empty? In the quantum field theories (QFT’s) which underlie modern particle physics, the notion of empty space has been replaced with that of a vacuum state, defined to be the ground (lowest energy density) state of a collection of quantum fields. A peculiar and truly quantum mechanical feature of the quantum fields is that they exhibit zero-point fluctuations everywhere in space, even in regions which are otherwise ‘empty’ (i.e. devoid of matter and radiation). These zero-point fluctuations of the quantum fields, as well as other ‘vacuum phenomena’ of quantum field theory, give rise to an enormous vacuum energy density ρvac. As we shall see, this vacuum energy density is believed to act as a contribution to the cosmological constant Λ appearing in Einstein’s field equations from 1917, 1 8πG R g R Λg = T (1) µν − 2 µν − µν c4 µν where Rµν and R refer to the curvature of spacetime, gµν is the metric, Tµν the energy-momentum tensor, G the gravitational constant, and c the speed of light.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics of Accelerated Fermion Gases and Their Instability at the Unruh Temperature
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 100, 125009 (2019) Thermodynamics of accelerated fermion gases and their instability at the Unruh temperature † ‡ George Y. Prokhorov ,1,* Oleg V. Teryaev,1,2,3, and Valentin I. Zakharov2,4,5, 1Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia 2Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, NRC Kurchatov Institute, 117218 Moscow, Russia 3M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 117234 Moscow, Russia 4School of Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, 690950 Vladivostok, Russia 5Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141700 Dolgoprudny, Russia (Received 6 July 2019; revised manuscript received 30 October 2019; published 9 December 2019) We demonstrate that the energy density of an accelerated fermion gas evaluated within quantum- statistical approach in Minkowski space is related to a quantum correction to the vacuum expectation value of the energy-momentum tensor in a space with nontrivial metric and conical singularity. The key element of the derivation is the existence of a novel class of polynomial Sommerfeld integrals. The emerging duality of quantum-statistical and geometrical approaches is explicitly checked at temperatures T above or equal to the Unruh temperature TU. Treating the acceleration as an imaginary part of the chemical potential allows for an analytical continuation to temperatures T<TU. There is a discontinuity at T ¼ TU manifested in the second derivative of the energy density with respect to the temperature. Moreover, energy density becomes negative at T<TU, apparently indicating some instability. Obtained results might have phenomenological implications for the physics of heavy-ion collisions. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.125009 I. INTRODUCTION In particular, the energy densities of accelerated gas of massless particles with spins 0 and 1=2 were evaluated Study of collective quantum properties of relativistic explicitly [9,10].
    [Show full text]
  • On the Regularization of Phase-Space Path Integral in Curved Manifolds
    On the Regularization of Phase-Space Path Integral in Curved Manifolds Marco Falconi June 1, 2010 ......................................................................................................... Introduction n this work we discuss path integrals both in flat and curved space-time: in particular I we describe how to write the integral kernel of the time evolution operator (in a curved space time we describe the evolution with respect to a geodesic affine parameter, such as the proper time if the particle has a non-zero mass) in a path integral form, both in configuration and phase space. We briefly introduce a path integral formulation of Quantum Field Theo- ries, however we focus our attention mainly on quantum mechanical models. We develop the idea, originally due to Schwinger, to describe effective actions in quantum field theory as quantum mechanical path integrals of a fictitious particle with evolution dictated by a suitable Hamiltonian function. We will see that one could have obtained the same result as in field theory by first quantizing the particle which actually makes the loop of the Feynman graph corresponding to the effective action. In the second part we focus on a particle of mass m ≥ 0 that classically moves along a geodesic of curved space-time. Quantizing this model we will see that even if it is still possible to describe its evolution in the affine parameter by means of a path integral, the results obtained would be ambiguous unless we introduce suitable regularization schemes and related counterterms. This is, in fact, the key point of path integrals used in physics. Configuration space path integral needs different counterterms, depending on the reg- ularization scheme used, in order to give the same results at any perturbative order for the integral kernel of the evolution operator.
    [Show full text]
  • The Casimir Effect
    April 19th 2009 The Casimir Effect Version 3 A Comprehensive Exercise by Kyle Kingsbury Abstract The Casimir Effect is a small force on conducting surfaces which arises from quantum electrodynamics. Quantizing the electromagnetic field yields a small ground-state energy for each frequency. Summing over all frequencies implies the field has an infinite vacuum energy. Between conducting surfaces, this energy may be dependent on geometry, which gives rise to forces on the boundaries. This comprehensive exercise ex- plores the electromagnetic ground state energy and the consequent force between two conducting plates. Some extensions and generalizations of the Casimir force to other geometries and temperatures are dis- cussed. Finally, it offers a brief overview of experi- mental attempts to confirm the effect. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Quantizing the Electromagnetic Field 3 3 The Force Between Two Plates 6 3.1 Casimir's Derivation . 6 3.2 A Modern Derivation . 11 3.3 Other Regularization Techniques . 14 4 Atomic Geometry 14 4.1 Historical Context . 14 4.2 Atom-Plate Interactions . 15 4.3 Atom-Atom Interaction . 16 5 Geometry Dependence 16 5.1 A Spherical Shell . 17 5.2 Corners . 18 6 Temperature Dependence 19 6.1 Basic Thermodynamics . 19 6.2 Numerical Modeling . 20 7 Experimental Verification 22 7.1 Early Efforts . 22 7.2 Modern Experiments . 23 7.3 Optical Transparency . 25 7.4 Repulsive Forces . 26 7.5 Electrostatic Interactions . 26 8 Conclusion 27 Bibliography 28 1 1 Introduction Weird things happen in nature. Physicists, concerned with modeling and predicting the fundamen- tal dynamics that underlie the observable universe, frequently find themselves discussing things which|to our everyday physical intuition|might seem completely impossible, yet the physics works.
    [Show full text]