DOCSLIB.ORG

The Battle Behind the Wire: U.S. Prisoner and Detainee Operations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Battle Behind the Wire: U.S. Prisoner and Detainee Operations CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. The Battle Behind the Wire U.S. Prisoner and Detainee Operations from World War II to Iraq Cheryl Benard, Edward O’Connell, Cathryn Quantic Thurston, Andres Villamizar, Elvira N. Loredo, Thomas Sullivan, Jeremiah Goulka Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release; distribution unlimited NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted within the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by OSD, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community under Contract W74V8H-06-C-0002. Library of Congress Control Number: 2010942311 ISBN: 978-0-8330-5045-8 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2011 RAND Corporation Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page (http://www.rand.org/publications/ permissions.html). Published 2011 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface In major conflicts dating to World War II and continuing through recent operations in Iraq, U.S. forces have taken a large number of prisoners or detainees. Although prisoner of war (POW) and detainee operations ultimately tend to become quite extensive, military planners and policymakers have repeatedly treated such operations as an after- thought. In reality, such operations can be a central part of the suc- cessful prosecution of a conflict. Determining how to gain knowledge from, hold, question, influence, and release captured adversaries can be an important component of military strategy and doctrine, both during the conflict and in reconstruction afterward. This publication presents a historical analysis of POW opera- tions during World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, as well as detailed analyses of detainee operations during the recent conflict in Iraq. It should be of interest to military planners, strate- gists, and policymakers concerned with ongoing and future prisoner and detainee operations. This research was sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense and conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Com- batant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community. iii iv The Battle Behind the Wire For more information on the RAND International Security and Defense Policy Center, see http://www.rand.org/nsrd/ndri/centers/ isdp.html or contact the director (contact information is provided on the web page). Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Figures ............................................................................. ix Tables .............................................................................. xi Summary .........................................................................xiii Acknowledgments .............................................................. xxi Abbreviations .................................................................. xxiii CHAPTER ONE The Recurring Importance of Prisoner and Detainee Operations ...... 1 CHAPTER TWO U.S. Programs for German Prisoners in World War II .................... 5 Arrival and Administration ....................................................... 6 Delays in Disaggregating the Prisoner Population ............................. 8 Reeducation Programs ............................................................. 9 Conclusions ........................................................................15 CHAPTER THREE Korean War Prisoner Programs ...............................................17 Establishment of Prisoner Camps in Korea ...................................18 Initial Education Programs ..................................................... 20 Polarization Among Prisoners ...................................................25 Initial Repatriation Phase ....................................................... 28 Final Repatriation Phase ........................................................ 30 Conclusions ........................................................................31 v vi The Battle Behind the Wire CHAPTER FOUR Prisoner and Detainee Operations in Vietnam ............................33 Categorization of Prisoners of War and Detainees ........................... 34 Application of the Geneva Conventions and Detention of Insurgents .....35 The Enemy Prisoner of War Program .......................................... 38 Detainee Operations ............................................................. 40 Phung Hoang: Targeting the Infrastructure .................................41 Chieu Hoi: Using Defection Programs in a Counterinsurgency ......... 43 Motivation and Morale ...........................................................45 Conclusions ........................................................................47 CHAPTER FIVE Detainee Operations in Iraq ...................................................49 Legal and Doctrinal Issues Associated with the Iraq Experience............51 A Rocky Start for Detainee Operations in Iraq ...............................53 The Post–Abu Ghraib Operating Environment ...............................55 A Burgeoning Strategy for Detainee Operations ...........................57 Keeping Pace with Increasing Numbers of Detainees ......................58 Classifying and Adjudicating Detainees .....................................59 Counterinsurgency Behind the Wire .........................................62 Disconnect Between Operational Reality and Official Policy .............65 Violence Flares Again ......................................................... 66 Innovations Under a New Commander ....................................... 68 Irreconcilables ...................................................................70 Strategies for Reintegration, Reconciliation, and Counterradicalization .....................................................71 From Strategic Risk to Strategic Advantage .................................73 Special Populations ...............................................................75 Detainee Motivation and Morale .............................................. 77 Task Force 134 Transition-In Survey .........................................78 Transition-In Survey Conclusions ............................................79 Summarizing Changes in Detainee Operations ...............................79 CHAPTER SIX Conclusions and Recommendations .........................................83 Basic Elements of Detention Operations ...................................... 84 Contents vii Basic Care and Custody of Detainees ....................................... 84 Planning for Special
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ncos Stepping up to Lead - Page 14 COMMENTARY Thoughts for the New Year – Today by Col
    C M Y K Vol. 36, No. 06 Friday, February 6, 2009 NCOs stepping up to lead - page 14 COMMENTARY Thoughts for the New Year – today by Col. William Francis deep breath and said that he had to get back 6th Mission Support Group Commander to his load as he had a ways to go before he could stop for the day. He bent down picked The other day I saw a man pulling a trail- up the trailer and strained off into the dis- er fully loaded down the slow lane of Dale tance. As I watched him slowly fade from Mabry, he was struggling mightily against sight I wondered how long it would take an unbelievable load and so I pulled over him to get where he was going and why he and approached him. As I got close, he was did not just stop, put the trailer down and breathing hard, sweat dripping from his face, leave his burdens right there on the side of his clothes drenched with sweat and I asked the road. And then I realized that I have to him if he needed help, if he was OK. He fight not to do the same thing, I do not actu- said, he was fine, that he did not need any ally pull around a heavily loaded old trailer help and in fact that he did this everyday (and thankfully there is not a man pulling throughout the year. At this point he pulled a trailer everyday down Dale Mabry) but I the trailer off of the road out of traffic, wiped will cling to things that slow me, that burden his brow and explained to me that when me, that discourage me if I am not careful.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisons in Yemen
    [PEACEW RKS [ PRISONS IN YEMEN Fiona Mangan with Erica Gaston ABOUT THE REPORT This report examines the prison system in Yemen from a systems perspective. Part of a three-year United States Institute of Peace (USIP) rule of law project on the post-Arab Spring transition period in Yemen, the study was supported by the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Bureau of the U.S. State Department. With permission from the Yemeni Ministry of Interior and the Yemeni Prison Authority, the research team—authors Fiona Mangan and Erica Gaston for USIP, Aiman al-Eryani and Taha Yaseen of the Yemen Polling Center, and consultant Lamis Alhamedy—visited thirty-seven deten- tion facilities in six governorates to assess organizational function, infrastructure, prisoner well-being, and security. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Fiona Mangan is a senior program officer with the USIP Governance Law and Society Center. Her work focuses on prison reform, organized crime, justice, and security issues. She holds degrees from Columbia University, King’s College London, and University College Dublin. Erica Gaston is a human rights lawyer with seven years of experience in programming and research in Afghanistan on human rights and justice promotion. Her publications include books on the legal, ethical, and practical dilemmas emerging in modern conflict and crisis zones; studies mapping justice systems and outcomes in Afghanistan and Yemen; and thematic research and opinion pieces on rule of law issues in transitioning countries. She holds degrees from Stanford University and Harvard Law School. Cover photo: Covered Yard Area, Hodeida Central. Photo by Fiona Mangan. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: Pre-Trial Detention
    Detention Monitoring Tool Factsheet Pre-trial detention Addressing risk factors to prevent torture and ill-treatment ‘Long periods of pre-trial custody contribute to overcrowding in prisons, exacerbating the existing problems as regards conditions and relations between the detainees and staff; they also add to the burden on the courts. From the standpoint of preventing ill-treatment, this raises serious concerns for a system already showing signs of stress.’ (UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture)1 1. Definition and context 2. What are the main standards? Remand prisoners are detained during criminal Because of its severe and often irreversible negative investigations and pending trial. Pre-trial detention is effects, international law requires that pre-trial not a sanction, but a measure to safeguard a criminal detention should be the exception rather than the procedure. rule. At any one time, an estimated 3.2 million people are Pre-trial detention is only legitimate where there is a behind bars awaiting trial, accounting for 30 per cent reasonable suspicion of the person having committed of the total prison population worldwide. They are the offence, and where detention is necessary and legally presumed innocent until proven guilty but may proportionate to prevent them from absconding, be held in conditions that are worse than those for committing another offence, or interfering with the convicted prisoners and sometimes for years on end. course of justice during pending procedures. This means that pre-trial detention is not legitimate where Pre-trial detention undermines the chance of a fair these objectives can be achieved through other, less trial and the presumption of innocence.
    [Show full text]
  • KNOWN BURN PIT LOCATIONS: • Abu Ghraib Prison, Iraq • Camp Adder, Talil AFB, Iraq • Al Asad Air Base, Kuwait • Ali Air B
    KNOWN BURN PIT LOCATIONS: Abu Ghraib Prison, Iraq Camp Adder, Talil AFB, Iraq Al Asad Air Base, Kuwait Ali Air Base (formerly Tallil Air Base) Al Quo, Iraq Al-Sahra, Iraq aka Speicher Camp Al Taji, IQ (Army Airfield) Al Taqaddum, Iraq (Ridgeway) Camp Anaconda, Iraq Camp Anderson, Iraq FOB Andrea Camp Arifjan, Kuwait(Camden Yards) Camp Ar Ramadi, Iraq Baghdad International Airport (BIAP), Iraq Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan Balad Air Force Base, Iraq Baquba, Iraq (See Warhorse) Camp Bastion Airfield, Afghanistan Camp Bucca, Iraq FOB Caldwell, Kirkush, Iraq Camp Cedar I and I, Talil AFB, Iraq Camp Chesty, Iraq Camp Courage, Mosul, Iraq Camp Cropper, Iraq Camp Delta, Al Kut, Iraq FOB Delta, Al Kut, Iraq Diwaniya, Iraq Djibouti, Iraq Camp Echo, Diwaynia, Iraq FOB Endurance - Qayyarah Airfield West/Saddam Air Base Falluja, Iraq FOB Fenty, Jalalabad, Afghanistan FOB Hammer a/k/a Butler Range FOB Freedom, Kirkuk, Iraq FOB Gabe, Baqubah, Iraq Former FOB Gains Mills Camp Geiger, Iraq Green Zone, Iraq Jalalabad, Afghanistan Kabul, Afghanistan Kalsu, Iraq Kandahar, Afghanistan Kirkuk, Iraq Kut Al Hayy Airbase, Iraq Camp Liberty, Iraq (aka Camp Trashcan) Camp Loyalty, Iraq FOB Marez, Mosul, Iraq FOB McHenry COB Meade, Camp Liberty, Iraq Mosul, Iraq Navstar, Iraq Camp Pennsylvania, Kuwait Quatar, Iraq Q-West, Iraq - Qayyarah Airfield West/Saddam Air Base Camp Ridgeway, Iraq (Al Taquaddum) Camp Rustamiyah, Iraq Camp Salerno, Afghanistan Camp Scania, Iraq Scania, Iraq Camp Shield, Baghdad, Iraq COB Speicher, Iraq aka Al Sahra Airfield (formerly FOB) Camp Stryker, Iraq FOB Sykes, Iraq (Tall' Afar) Taji, Iraq Tall' Afar, Iraq Tallil AFB, Iraq (now is Ali Air Base) Camp Victory, Iraq FOB Warhorse, Baqubah, Iraq FOB Warrior, Kirkuk, Iraq .
    [Show full text]
  • Imprisonment: Where?
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. IMPRISONMENT: WHERE? -- --- - --5 DEC "1 '\918 Imprisonment: where? Institutions (prisons and remand houses) to which persons* sentenced to tenns of imprisonment may be committed There are various types of t)(ison in the Netherlands, each type being intended for a particular category of piisoner, for instance young persons or aduits, prisoners serving short-term or long-term sentenQ~S, men or women. Selection for any of these institutions takes into account: - age; - length of sentence. Another important factor is whether or not the person concerned wa~ already in custody when sentenced (i.e. on remand in a rgrnand house). Age As far as age is concerned, a distinction is drawn between adults (persons aged 23 and over} and young p1'lrsons (the 18 -23 age-group; in some cases, persons under 18 Or ;:,VGii persons of23 and 24). length of sentence When distinguishing between persons serving short-term and long-term sentences, the actual du ration of the sentence is taken into account, that is to say, the sentence imposed less any period spent in custody awaiting trial or sentence (Le. in preliminary detention). The length of sentence is important since, as already * the only establishment to which women sentenced to imprisonment are committed Is the Rotterdam Women's Prison; the information given in this pamphlet, therefore, refers only to male prisoners. 1 stated, a number of institutions are intended for prisoners serving short-term sentences and a number of others for those serving long-term sentences.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Trial Detention Addressing Risk Factors to Prevent Torture and Ill-Treatment
    Detention Monitoring Tool Second edition FACTSHEET Pre-trial detention Addressing risk factors to prevent torture and ill-treatment ‘Long periods of pre-trial custody contribute to overcrowding in prisons, exacerbating the existing problems as regards conditions and relations between the detainees and staff; they also add to the burden on the courts. From the standpoint of preventing ill-treatment, this raises serious concerns for a system already showing signs of stress.’ (UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture)1 1. Definition and context 2. What are the main standards? Remand prisoners are detained during criminal Because of its severe and often irreversible negative investigations and pending trial. Pre-trial detention is effects, international law requires that pre-trial detention not a sanction, but a measure to safeguard a criminal should be the exception rather than the rule. procedure. Pre-trial detention is only legitimate where there is a At any one time, an estimated 3.2 million people are reasonable suspicion of the person having committed behind bars awaiting trial, accounting for 30 per cent of the offence, and where detention is necessary and the total prison population worldwide. In some countries, proportionate to prevent them from absconding, pre-trial detainees reportedly constitute the majority of committing another offence, or interfering with the course the prison population, and in some settings even over of justice during pending procedures. This means that 90 per cent of detainees.2 They are legally presumed pre-trial detention is not legitimate where these objectives innocent until proven guilty but may be held in conditions can be achieved through other, less intrusive measures.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Islamic State' (ISIS)
    Issue 23, April 2018 Middle East: The Origins of the ‘Islamic State’ (ISIS) Mediel HOVE Abstract. This article examines the origins of the ‘Islamic State’ or the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham or Levant (ISIS) in light of the contemporary political and security challenges posed by its diffusion of Islamic radicalism. The Arab Spring in 2011 ignited instability in Syria providing an operational base for the terrorist group to pursue its once abandoned Islamic state idea. Its growth and expansion has hitherto proved to be a threat not only to the Middle East but to international security given its thrust on world domination. It concludes that the United States of America’s activities in the Middle East were largely responsible for the rise of the Islamic State. Keywords: Islamic state, Islamic radicalism, international security, Middle East. Introduction The goal of this article was to examine the origins of the “Islamic State” (IS) or the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (Syria) (ISIS), the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in light of the contemporary political Mediel HOVE and security challenges posed by its diffu- Research Associate, sion of Islamic radicalism in a drive to estab- International Centre for Nonviolence, lish the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq. This Durban University of Technology, is important given the fact that the roots of Durban, South Africa, and ISIS are under-examined in academic litera- Senior Lecturer, ture although they are tangentially covered History Department, University of Zimbabwe in the media. This study augments those E-mail: [email protected] studies that have attempted to examine the roots of ISIS such as Gulmohamad (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Detention Prior to Adjudication
    CUSTODIAL AND NON-CUSTODIAL MEASURES Detention Prior to Adjudication Criminal justice assessment toolkit 2 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna CUSTODIAL AND NON-CUSTODIAL MEASURES Detention Prior to Adjudication Criminal Justice Assessment Toolkit UNITED NATIONS New York, 2006 The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations, the Secretariat and Institutions of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the Belgian 2006 OSCE Chairmanship concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has not been formally edited. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE ISSUE................................................................................ 1 2. OVERVIEW: GENERAL AND STATISTICAL DATA.................................................... 5 2.1 DETENTION TRENDS AND PROFILE OF PROCESS .................................... 5 2.2 LEGAL REPRESENTATION ............................................................................. 6 2.3 PROFILE OF DETAINEES................................................................................ 7 2.4 KEY CHALLENGES: OVERCROWDING, TB, AND HIV .................................. 7 2.5 QUALITY OF DATA........................................................................................... 8 3. LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Argument Of: Page
    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ------------------- AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION, ) Petitioner, ) v. ) No. 19-251 ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL ) OF CALIFORNIA, ) Respondent. ) -------------------) THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, ) Petitioner, ) v. ) No. 19-255 ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL ) OF CALIFORNIA, ) Respondent. ) ------------------- Pages: 1 through 110 Place: Washington, D.C. Date: April 26, 2021 HERITAGE REPORTING CORPORATION Official Reporters 1220 L Street, N.W., Suite 206 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 628-4888 www.hrccourtreporters.com Official - Subject to Final Review 1 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 2 ------------------- 3 AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION, ) 4 Petitioner, ) 5 v. ) No. 19-251 6 ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL ) 7 OF CALIFORNIA, ) 8 Respondent. ) 9 -------------------) 10 THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, ) 11 Petitioner, ) 12 v. ) No. 19-255 13 ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL ) 14 OF CALIFORNIA, ) 15 Respondent. ) 16 ------------------- 17 Washington, D.C. 18 Monday, April 26, 2021 19 20 The above-entitled matter came on for oral 21 argument before the Supreme Court of the United States 22 at 10:00 a.m. 23 24 25 Heritage Reporting Corporation Official - Subject to Final Review 2 1 APPEARANCES: 2 3 DEREK L. SHAFFER, ESQUIRE, Washington, D.C.; on behalf 4 of the Petitioners. 5 ELIZABETH B. PRELOGAR, Acting Solicitor General, 6 Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; for 7 the United States, as amicus curiae, 8 supporting vacatur and remand. 9 AIMEE A. FEINBERG, Deputy Solicitor General, 10 Sacramento, California; on behalf of the 11 Respondent. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Heritage Reporting Corporation Official - Subject to Final Review 3 1 C O N T E N T S 2 ORAL ARGUMENT OF: PAGE: 3 DEREK L.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Bucca Newletter #2
    CAMP BUCCA NEWSLETTER VOLUME 1 EDITION 1 18 February 2008 Airmen Deliver School Supplies, Soccerballs to Safwan School Story and photo by SPC Brandon Hubbard Students received a gift of supplies and athletic equipment Wednesday, Feb. 6, at a school near Umm Qasr, Iraq. Airmen from the 887th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron, Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, delivered dozens of supplies to the students, including paper, coloring books, pencils, crayons and hand-sewn book bags, as well as a dozen soccer balls. Many of the materials were donations from Girl Scout Troop 76 from Cornwall, New York. The 887th ESFS is charged with the external security of Forward Operating Base Bucca, under the command of the 300th Military Police Brigade. “Taking a diversion from routine patrols lets us meet and interact with the local populous,” said Staff Sgt. Matt Hamblen, the patrol squad leader. Speaking with the headmaster of the school, Hamblen explained that the items were all provided by Americans who support the Iraqi people and want to see them succeed. In January, Al-Basra became the ninth province to be returned to the Iraqi Government. During this period, the Army, Navy and Air Force service members at Camp Bucca in the southern province are assisting the Iraqi population with healthcare, supplies and other humanitarian aid. Continued on page 7 Table of Contents 2………………………CG’s Column 3………...CSM & Chaplain Column 4……………………TOA Ceremony 5…………………….Security Forces 6…………………..Top Marine Visit 7…………….Airmen Deliver (Con.) 8………………………….Bucca Cup 9…………………….Tell Your Story 10………………….Need A Passport 1 The Camp Bucca Newsletter is C OMMANDER COLUMN published in the interest of all Service- members, families and civilian employ- ees of the Camp Bucca, Iraq commu- Bucca Team, nity.
    [Show full text]
  • ISIS: the Terrorist Group That Would Be a State
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons CIWAG Case Studies 12-2015 ISIS: The Terrorist Group That Would Be a State Michael W.S. Ryan Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ciwag-case-studies Recommended Citation Ryan, Michael W.S., "IWS_02 - ISIS: The Terrorist Group That Would Be a State" (2015). CIWAG Irregular Warfare Studies. 2. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ciwag-case-studies/4/ This Book is brought to you for free and open access by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in CIWAG Case Studies by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CIWAG CIWAG IRREGULAR WARFARE STUDIES number 2 CENTER ON IRREGULAR WARFARE AND ARMED GROUPS I RREGULAR W ARFARE S TUDIES ISIS: The Terrorist Group That Would Be a State Michael W. S. Ryan number 2 U.S. Naval War College ISIS: The Terrorist Group That Would Be a State Irregular Warfare Studies In 2008, the U.S. Naval War College established the Center on Irregular Warfare and Armed Groups (CIWAG). The center’s primary mission is to bring together operators, practitioners, and scholars to share academic expertise and knowledge about and operational experience in violent and nonviolent irregular warfare chal- lenges, and to make this important research available to a wider community of interest. Our intent is also to include use of these materials within joint professional military educational (JPME) curricula to fulfill the needs of military practitioners preparing to meet the challenges of the post-9/11 world.
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex County Woman Charged with Concealing Terrorist Financing to Syrian Al-Nusra Front, a Foreign Terrorist Organization
    fi8ffi74,DCS UNITEO STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Hon. Cathy L. Waldor V. Magistrate. No. 20-9451 (CLW) MARIA BELL, a/k/a.Maria Sue Bell" CRTMTNAL COUPr=AhfT l, Matthew Hohmann, being duly sworn, state the following is true and conect to the best of my knowledge and belief: SEE ATTACHMENT A I further state that I am a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of lnvestigation, and that this complaint is based on the following facts: , SEE ATTACHMENT B continued on the attached pages and made a part hereof. Federal Bureau of lnvestigation Swom to before me, and subscribed to in my presence November 24,2020 at Newark, New Jersey HONORABLE CATHY L. WALDOR fi'a* UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Signature of Judicial fficer 2018ROO574/DCS ATTACHMENT A Count One (Concealment of Terrorist Financing to a Designated Foreign Terrorist Organization) From in or about February 2018 through November 2018, in Morris County, in the District of New Jersey, and elsewhere, defendant MARIA BELL, a/k/a “Maria Sue Bell,” did knowingly conceal or disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of material support or resources, or any funds or proceeds of such funds, knowing or intending that the support or resources were provided to a designated foreign terrorist organization, that is, the al-Nusra Front (“ANF”) and Jabhat al-Nusra, also known by other aliases including Hay’at Tahrir al- Sham (“HTS”), in violation of section 2339B of this title. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2339C(c)(2)(A).
    [Show full text]