DOCSLIB.ORG

AO Hume and 1857 Rebel in Etawah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AO Hume and 1857 Rebel in Etawah Academic Social research RNI No. 1276610 ISSN No. 2456-2645 A. O. Hume and 1857 Rebel in Etawah : A Study Dr. Shailendra Kumar Sharma AM-20217 Head-Department of History, K.K. (PG) College, Etawah Email- [email protected] Etawah is a city on the banks of Yamuna River in the state of Uttar Pradesh in India. It is the administrative headquarters of Etawah District. The city was an important center for the Revolt of 1857 (Allan Octavian Hume, the founder of Indian National Congress was district collector then). Also is the place of sangam or confluence between Yamuna and Chambal. It is also the site of the remains of the Great Hedge of India.1 When freedom struggle started in 1857. The news of the outbreak of struggle -against the British at Meerut reached Etawah on May 12, 1857. The Indian sepoys at that time stationed at Etawah consisted of a detachment of the 8th Irregulars, and a wing of the 9th Infantry. As a precautionary measure, the British authorities at once employed them with the police in patrolling the roads.2 On 16th May first violent incident occurred in Etawah when an attempt was made to disarm a small party of mutineers from the 3rd Lightly Cavalry, Meerut.3 The incident occurred when one of the patrolling parties was on the Agra road, it met seven armed men. The Kotwal of the patrolling party challenged them, and as their replies were unsatisfactory he arrested seven of them. These resisted disarmament desperately, but four of them were killed on the spot and two were captured, the remaining one succeeding in effecting his escape. This band of Indian-sepoys consisted of Pathan troopers who had been engaged at Meerut but joined the struggle. The official report was that the district was known lor the loyalty of its inhabitants, but in’ few districts the struggle of the people assumed such a proportion. In another incident of the struggle against the British when Jaswantnagar (in tahsil Etawah) was besieged by the Indian sepoys from Meerut. A.O. Hume, the district Magistrate of Etawah, on learning that the 9th Native Infantry at Aligarh and Mainpuri had mutinied, (the mutineers attacked the treasury and the police)4 organized the evacuation of the Europeans and the garrison (also of the 9th N.I.) to the more defensible town of Barhpura, across the Jamuna River, on the Gwalior road. On 22nd May, the troops with their officers and ladies marched towardsthe Yamuna with a view to occupying a position at Barhpura (in tehsils Etawah). No signs had hitherto appeared of disaffection among these troops; but just as they reached the ghat on the Yamuna, suddenly the majority of them rose against the British and turned 27 | October to December 2015 Academic Social research RNI No. 1276610 ISSN No. 2456-2645 back to Etawah. Those who remained loyal to the British reached Barhpura safely the lame day accompanied by their officers and ladies. The sepoys who returned to Etawah attacked the treasury. and carried off a large amount of treasure on the backs of camels arid the local police at once disappeared, while the collector and an another British officer who had remained behind to guard, the civil station, were forced to fly, and they joined the party at Barhpura. Immediately the rising became general mixed bodies of sepoys, city rabble, Mewatis. Julahas and Rajputs commenced plundering the sepoys lines, carried off arms and ammunition and burnt two bungalows besides the sessions court house, and the post office. They also broke the district jail and released the prisoners.5 However, most of the troops declined to remain in Etawah, that night of 22nd May.6 At Barhpura, the fugitive British solicited help from the Bhadauria Rajputs but without success. On May 24, they being joined by ‘fresh re-inforcernents from Gwalior. proceeded towards Etawah and re-occupied it the next day. In order to restore the British authority, martial law was proclaimed on May 27. In-spite of this the zamindars of village Samthar (in tahsil Bharthana) kept up the struggle and refused to surrender until their fort was stormed and burnt and the garrison put to the sword by the British. The result of this incident was .that very soon the whole country around was up in arms. As a precautionary measure, the European ladies, and children were sent to Agra escorted by a mixed detachment of the Gwalior regiment and the local levies raised by Kunwar Zohar Singh of Partabner (in tahsil Etawah) Their departure was again followed by general rising and the British authority was threatened by the freedom fighters at Bela, Phaphund and Auraiya. Hume now dispatched 200 grenadiers towards Auraiya and directed the tahsildar of Bela to collect supplies and to enlist fresh troops with the hope of establishing the “British authority. But suddenly his hopes were dashed to the ground when news came on June 16, that the Gwalior regiment also rose against the British. The troops enlisted at Etawah refused in the presence of the collector to obey their commanding officer. The collector and another British officer were also informed that the troops had intended to murder their officers8. There was then no force left in the district upon which the Europeans could rely. Therefore on the morning of June 17, all Europeans quitted the district for Agra. As soon as they left, the grenadiers plundered the treasury and also a few shops in the city and moved across the river. On 24th May, A.O. Hume, who had safely reached the loyal troops from Barhpura, was joined by Major Hennessy and the Grenadier Regiment of the Gwalior Contingent.7 On the following day, i.e. on 25th May 1857, Hume, 28 | October to December 2015 Academic Social research RNI No. 1276610 ISSN No. 2456-2645 Hennessy and the troops from Barhpura re-occupied the town of Etawah.8 Energetic measures were at once adopted for the restoration of order; numbers of persons were arrested with property in their possession stolen from the lines and bungalows. Much more was given up by persons who professed to have forcibly regained it from robbers or to have originally taken it under their protection, several gangs of dacoits were broken up or dispersed. And on May 27th martial law was proclaimed. Hume sent the European women and children (approximately 30) of Etawah to Agra under an Indian military escort unit, led by Lakshman Singh, his de facto deputy collector on 14th June 1857. At the same time, he attempted to restore in the disturbed south-eastern tahsils of the district Etawah. On the 16th of June news arrived of mutiny and massacre at Gwalior. This was communicated by the senior native officer to Major Hennassy. The latter explained his intended course of action, that he would at once set off for Agra, but the former refused to obey and declared that he would not proceed to Agra. Hume, ordered by government to remain in Agra, endeavoured, with the assistance of loyal Indian officials and influential Zamindaars, to maintain a semblance of organized administration in the Etawah district. Already a fine marksman with small arms, he spent some of his time learning military artillery techniques.9 Early in August 1857, the zamindars of the district began to quarrel among themselves regarding their respective jurisdictions. Hume drew up a detailedscheme assigning portions of the district with certain monthly stipends to each of the zamindars and tahsildars. Under this arrangement Phaphund and Bela were entrusted to the tahsildar Debi Prashad, assisted by Chhatar Singh of Sahar and Laik Singh of Harchandpur; Bharthana remained under the control of the tahsildar Ishwari Prashad, and Rao Jaswant Rao of Dalipnagar. Etawah tahsil was handed over to Kunwar Zohar Singh, Shyam Bihari Lal of the police being placed in-charge of the city in subordination to the former. Auraiya was managed by the tahsildar, Ram Baksh till he died because of the effects of ill-treatment. The tracts of Chakranagar and Barhpura were entrusted to the charge of Raja Khushal Singh and Rao Jawahir Singh, the former of whom subsequently participated in the struggle against the British10. Being dissatisfied with the arrangement, Rana Mahendra Singh of Sakrauli and Narayan Singh of Chakranagar defied the authority of Kunwar Zohar Singh and his officers. The Raja of Ruru ousted the government officials, occupied several villages and himself collected revenue. Rup Singh, the uncle of the minor raja of Bhareh, did the same in Auraiya. The pro-British zamindars had expected to receive aid from a British force which advanced to Mainpuri in 29 | October to December 2015 Academic Social research RNI No. 1276610 ISSN No. 2456-2645 October, 1857. But when it passed on without visiting Etawah and it was learnt that the British were with difficulty holding Lucknow and Kanpur, the people of Etawah began openly to make preparations for struggle and began to assemble in every direction. About this time, the Gwalior contingent of the anti- British sepoys threatened Auraiya, while Rup Singh of Bhareh invited them at Shergarh where he built a bridge of boats,-, for them. But Rao Jaswant Rao and Ishwari Prashad, somehow, managed to destroy, r the bridge of boats. Both of them together with their men were surrounded by Rup Singh and other noted freedom fighters namely Niranjan Singh of Chakernagar, Ram Prashad and Pitam Singh but in the action Ram Prashad lost his life on November 1, 1857. On December 3, the nazim of the nawab of Farrukhabad, the Raja of Ruru and Rana Mahendra Singh of Sakrauli marched into Etawah and inflicted a crushing defeat on Kunwar Zohar Singh who had espoused the British cause.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notes and News
    ¾ol.1927 J Notesand News. 473 NOTES AND NEWS ALLANOCTAVIAN HUME, an Honorary Fellow of the AmericanOrnith- ologists'Union electedat the first meetingin 1883,died at his home,The Chalet, Upper Norwood,England, July 31, 1912, at the age of 83. No notice of his work having beenpublished in 'The Auk' at the time of his death, it is desirablethat somerecord of it shouldappear in this journal. Mr. Hume was born in England June 6, 1829, and was the youngestson of JosephHume, a former well-knownMember of Parliament. At the age of 20 he graduatedfrom the East India Collegeat Halleybury and enteringthe Indian Civil Servicewas detailedto the NorthwestProvinces. When the Indian Mutiny broke out he was acting as Collectorat Etawah betweenAgra and Cawnpore,and on accountof meritoriousservice on this occasionreceived the award of C. B. in 1862. In followingyears he filled varioushigh positionsin the Home, Revenueand AgriculturalDepartments of the Indian Serviceat Simla and as Secretaryto the Governmentof India. In 1870 he returned to the Northwest Provinces as a member of the Board of Revenue and in 1882 retired from the Indian Service but did not return to England until someyears later. During his years of residencein India, but chiefly between1862 and 1885,Hume devotedhis sparetime assiduouslyto ornithologyand with the aid of variouscollectors, especially William RuxtonDavison, brought togetherone of the largestcollections of birds ever amassedby any private individual. Thesehe preservedat his homein Simla in a room specially designedfor the purpose. He had outlineda completework on the birds of India, but by accidenthis nearly completedmanuscript was destroyed in 1885. He thereuponabandoned his work on Indian birds •vhichwould necessarilyhave to be largely rewritten and offeredhis entire collection to the British Museum of Natural History.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the BRITISH ORNITHOLOGISTS' CLUB
    Club Announcements 1 Bull. B.O.C. 2013 133(1) Bulletin of the BRITISH ORNITHOLOGISTS’ CLUB Vol. 133 No. 1 Published 1 March 2013 CLUB ANNOUNCEMENTS Chairman’s message Subscriptions were due for renewal on 1 January 2013. If you have not already paid, please do so as soon as possible to avoid the need for further reminders. Please remember that the subscription is £25. I am very pleased to report that all the Bulletins, up to and including Vol. 127 (2007), are now freely available via the Biodiversity Heritage Library website at www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/46639. Helen Baker ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING The Annual General Meeting of the British Ornithologists’ Club will be held in the upstairs room at The Barley Mow, Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EE, at 5.30 pm on Tuesday 21 May 2013. AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence. 2. Minutes of the Annual General Meeting held on 12 June 2012 (see Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 132: 137–138, and the BOC website). 3. Minutes of the Special General Meeting held on 12 June 2012 (see Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 132: 138–139, and the BOC website). 4. Receive and consider the Chairman’s Review, the Trustees’ Report and the Accounts for 2012 (these will be available in the room before the start of the meeting). 5. The Bulletin Editor’s report—Mr G. M. Kirwan. 6. Election of Ofcers and other Trustees. The Commitee proposes that: i. Mr Chris Storey be elected as Chairman (vice Miss Helen Baker) ii. Dr Robert Prŷs-Jones be re-elected as Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Natural History in Transitional China and British India
    BJHS: Themes 1:43–59, 2016. © British Society for the History of Science 2016. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non- commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. doi:10.1017/bjt.2016.6 First published online 28 March 2016 Negotiating natural history in transitional China and British India FA-TI FAN* AND JOHN MATHEW** Abstract. This article examines scientific developments in China and India by comparing and contrasting the enterprises of natural history during the late nineteenth and early twentieth cen- turies. From this perspective, the cases of China and India shared some similarities, but also exhibited important differences with respect to the conditions, ideologies, personnel, processes and strategies in scientific development. Two very large countries, with much left unexplored, attracted broad scientific interest in their flora and fauna from the early modern period; the interest intensified in the nineteenth century because of increasing accessibility to their interiors. However, the different historical situations that involved empire, nation, professionalization, geography and domestic and international politics helped shape the respective trajectories of scientific development in the two countries. Yet, despite their differences, China and India shared important similarities in the co-production of science and state, the global hierarchy of knowledge production, and the coloniality of power relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Juridical Sciences Course : B.A.Ll.B
    BRAND GUIDELINE ---------------------------------------------------- Topic Font Name- Candara Bold Font Size- 20 Font Color- White ------------------------ --------------------------- Heading Font Name- Arial (Bold) Font Size- 16 FACULTY OF JURIDICAL SCIENCES COURSE : B.A.LL.B. IISemester SUBJ ECT: HISTORY IV SUBJECTCIVIL LAW: CODE: MEANING, BAL DEFINITION-402 & IMPORTANCE NAME OF FACULTY: Dr. SADHNA TRIVEDI BRAND GUIDELINE ---------------------------------------------------- Topic Font Name- Candara Bold Font Size- 20 Font Color- White --------------------------------------------------- Heading Font Name- Arial (Bold) Lecture-26 Font Size- 16 The Moderate phase of Politics Indian nationalism arose in the latter half of the 19th century as a result of various factors like western education, socio-religious reforms, British policies and so on. In 1885, the Indian National Congress was formed which played a significant role in India’s freedom movement. The time period from 1885 to 1905 can be called the ‘Moderate Phase’. The leaders of this phase are called moderates. The Indian National Congress (INC) Formed in 1885 by Allan Octavian Hume, a retired British civil servant. Other founding members include Dadabhai Naoroji (Born on September 4, 1825) and Dinshaw Wacha. The first session was held in Bombay under the presidency of Womesh Chandra Bonnerjee in 1885. The first session was attended by 72 delegates from across the country. Viceroy of India at the time was Lord Dufferin who gave his permission to Hume for the first session. The Congress was formed with the intention of discussing problems faced by the people of the country irrespective of caste, creed, religion or language. It was basically a movement of the upper and middle class, western-educated Indians in its moderate phase.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theosophical Society's Ongoing Problem of Emotion and Control
    Taming the Astral Body: The Theosophical Society’s Ongoing Problem of Emotion and Control John L. Crow Florida State University Abstract In New York City in 1875, a group interested in Spiritualism and occult science founded what would become the Theosophical Society. Primarily the creation of Henry Steel Olcott and Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, the Theosophical Society went through a number of early incarnations. One original version promised to teach occult powers. After Blavatsky found that she could not honor earlier promises to teach occultism, she shifted the focus of the Society to one that promoted Universal Brotherhood instead, highlighting notions of the body and demanding the control of emotion as a means to rebuff demands for training. With this refocusing, Blavatsky reestablished control of the Society and asserted herself as the central channel of esoteric knowledge. Thus, by shifting the focus from the attainment of occult powers to the more ambiguous “spiritual enlightenment,” Blavatsky erected an elaborate, centralized system of delayed spiritual gratification, a system contingent upon the individual’s adoption of specific morals and values, while simultaneously maintaining control of the human body on all its levels: spiritual, social, physical, mental, and especially emotional. Introduction During a meeting of the Theosophical Society in New York City on October 18, 1876, the co-founder and legal counsel for the newly established organization, William Quan Judge (1851– 96), gave a lecture about his personal experiences in the study of Theosophy. He spoke about his recent experiences of astrally traveling and implanting his thoughts and ideas into the minds of others. He did this through focusing his will and commanding his “double,” or astral body, to go to these places and influence others.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club
    Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club Volume 139 No. 1 (Online) ISSN 2513-9894 (Online) March 2019 Club AnnouncementsAnnouncements 1 Bull.Bull. B.O.C.B.O.C. 20192019 139(1)139(1) Bulletin of the BRITISH ORNITHOLOGISTS’ CLUB Vol. 139 No. 1 Published 15 March 2019 CLUB ANNOUNCEMENTS The 992nd meeting of the Club was held on Monday 12 November 2018 in the upstairs room at the Barley Mow, 104 Horseferry Road, London SW1P 2EE. Twenty-fve people were present: Miss H. Baker, Mr P. J. Belman, Mr R. Bray, Mr S. Chapman, Ms J. Childers, Ms J. Day, Mr R. Dickey, Mr R. Gonzalez, Mr K. Heron, Ms J. Jones, Mr R. Langley, Dr C. F. Mann, Mr F. Martin, Mr D. J. Montier, Mr T. J. Pitman, Mr R. Price, Dr O. Prŷs-Jones, Dr R. Prŷs-Jones, Dr D. G. D. Russell, Mr P. Sandema, Mr S. A. H. Statham, Mr C. W. R. Storey (Chairman), Dr J. Tobias (Speaker), Mr J. Verhelst and Mr P. Wilkinson. Joe Tobias gave a talk entitled The shape of birds, and why it maters. Birds vary widely in size from the Bee Hummingbird Mellisuga helenae to Common Ostrich Struthio camelus, and come in a staggering range of shapes. Last century, the feld of eco-morphology began to shed light on the way birds are shaped by habitat preferences and foraging behaviour, but studies focused on relatively few species and left numerous gaps in understanding. Joe’s talk explored recent research based on detailed measurements of almost all of the world’s bird species, and described how this new infux of information has been combined with spatial, phylogenetic and ecological data to help answer some fundamental questions, such as how does bird diversity arise, and how can it best be conserved? REVIEWS McGhie, H.
    [Show full text]
  • BUCEROS 2 (2).Pdf
    BUCEROS Vol. 2, No. 2, (1997) ALLAN OCTAVIAN HUME: THE ORNITHOLOGIST AND HIS STRAY FEATHERS Allan Octavian Hume (1829-1912), renowned as an administrator of the British India Empire and one of the founder leaders of the Indian National Congress, is less known for his role in Indian ornithology. Some ornithologists continue to believe that the ‘politician Hume’ and the ‘birdman Hume’ were different persons, as politicians and orni- thologists are generally poles apart. Hume, as an ornithologist, was known for his many ornithological expeditions to areas in the Indian subcontinent till then largely unexplored, his huge collection of bird skins, nests and eggs, and his prolific scientific articles on Indian ornithology. In addition to his writings in the prestigious ornithological journal, Ibis, he almost single-handedly brought out a journal for Indian ornithology, Stray Feathers, to record observations and discoveries on the local avifauna. Then, as is now, there were detractors even for such a noble cause; as he wrote in the fourth volume, he was “not a little abused for starting Stray Feathers”. Bringing out the issues was an onerous task, as he had to function as editor and at the same time chief contributor of papers to the volumes. So prolific were his writings that if a paper did not carry its author’s name, one understood that it was a paper by Hume himself - many indeed were the cases! His repeated requests to other ornithologists and ‘bird-fanciers’ to put down in writing their observations in the Journal, helped to document information on Indian birds of the late nineteenth century that would have otherwise been lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian National Congress Sessions
    Indian National Congress Sessions The Indian National Congress (INC) was established in 1885 and it grew to become one of the most important political parties in pre-independence India. Starting as an organisation comprising only of the educated elite in India, it became a mass party later on with prominent leaders like Lajpat Rai, Tilak, Gandhi, Nehru, Bose, etc. as its members. Indian National Congress founders: Allan Octavian Hume, Dadabhai Naoroji and Dinshaw Edulji Wacha Indian National Congress Sessions Indian National Congress was founded on 28 December 1885. The sessions of Indian National Congress with the list of Congress Presidents are given in the table below: Year Location President Importance 1885 Bombay W C Bonnerjee 1st session attended by 72 delegates 1886 Calcutta Dadabhai Naoroji National Congress and National Conference Appeal made to Muslims to join hands with 1887 Madras Syed Badruddin Tyabji other national leaders 1888 Allahabad George Yule First English president 1889 Bombay Sir William Wedderburn - 1890 Calcutta Feroz Shah Mehta - 1891 Nagpur P. Ananda Charlu - 1892 Allahabad W C Bonnerjee - 1893 Lahore Dadabhai Naoroji - 1894 Madras Alfred Webb - 1895 Poona Surendranath Banerjee - National song ‘Vande Mataram’ sung for the 1896 Calcutta Rahimtullah M. Sayani first time 1897 Amravati C. Sankaran Nair - 1898 Madras Ananda Mohan Bose - 1899 Lucknow Romesh Chandra Dutt - 1900 Lahore N G Chandavarkar - 1901 Calcutta Dinshaw E. Wacha - 1902 Ahmedabad Surendranath Banerjee - 1903 Madras Lal Mohan Ghosh - 1904 Bombay
    [Show full text]
  • Theosophy and the Origins of the Indian National Congress
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Theosophy and the Origins of the Indian National Congress Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/73b4862g Journal International Journal of Hindu Studies, 7 Author Bevir, Mark Publication Date 2003 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THEOSOPHY AND THE ORIGINS OF THE INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS By Mark Bevir Department of Political Science University of California, Berkeley Berkeley CA 94720 USA [E-mail: [email protected]] ABSTRACT A study of the role of theosophy in the formation of the Indian National Congress enhances our understanding of the relationship between neo-Hinduism and political nationalism. Theosophy, and neo-Hinduism more generally, provided western-educated Hindus with a discourse within which to develop their political aspirations in a way that met western notions of legitimacy. It gave them confidence in themselves, experience of organisation, and clear intellectual commitments, and it brought them together with liberal Britons within an all-India framework. It provided the background against which A. O. Hume worked with younger nationalists to found the Congress. KEYWORDS: Blavatsky, Hinduism, A. O. Hume, India, nationalism, theosophy. 2 REFERENCES CITED Archives of the Theosophical Society, Theosophical Society, Adyar, Madras. Banerjea, Surendranath. 1925. A Nation in the Making: Being the Reminiscences of Fifty Years of Public Life . London: H. Milford. Bharati, A. 1970. "The Hindu Renaissance and Its Apologetic Patterns". In Journal of Asian Studies 29: 267-88. Blavatsky, H.P. 1888. The Secret Doctrine: The Synthesis of Science, Religion and Philosophy . 2 Vols. London: Theosophical Publishing House. ------ 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • The Congress Party As the Creator, Preserver and Destroyer of the Indian State?
    The Congress Party as the Creator, Preserver and Destroyer of the Indian State? Jona Aravind Dohrmann Sons of Ind, why sit ye idle, Wait ye for some Deva’s aid? Buckle to, be up and doing! Nations by themselves are made! (Sir Allan Octavian Hume, “Awake”)1 1 Introduction The introductory titular deliberation whether the Congress Party or Indian National Congress (INC) could be revered to as the Creator, Preserver and (potential) De- stroyer of the Indian State shall hint at a possible viewpoint from which this party can be examined. Readers familiar with Indian religions and mythology may imme- diately identify the aforementioned characterisation of the INC as an allegory of the famous Trimurti.2 Before delving into the role of the INC through the past decades it is worthwhile to highlight Sir Allan Octavian Hume, who is the author of the „awak- ening“ and rousing poem framing this article. His feats mark a seizable starting point from which the Congress Party set out in its quest to become India’s most dazzling political party. Well aware of the fact that there is no dearth of writings on India’s eldest party this article shall simply attempt to shed light on the Indian National Congress’ impact on forming the Indian State. Thereby the term ‘State’ shall be understood the way the Indian Constitution designs the Indian Republic which is a 1 First stanza from poem by Sir A.O. Hume, taken from “The Old Man’s Hope” (Calcutta, 1886), cited in: Mehrotra 2005, p. 75. 2 The Trimurti or triad represents all aspects of the Supreme Being.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020
    Contents Monthly Bulletin, DeCeMBeR 2020 FromtheDeskoftheGeneralSecretary 3 TulikaSen(08May1926-18October2020) 4 Rumjhum Ray Chaudhuri Bird’s-eyeviewofanArtistandArtHistorian 6 Isha Mahammad and Somnath Mukherjee SirWilliamJonesontheStudyofBirds 10 Arun Bandopadhyay BirdsandtheirConnoisseurs,asRevealedintheAnnalsofthe Journal of The Asiatic Society of Bengal (1832 -1843) 13 Tapati Mukherjee EdwardBlyth:TheUnrivalledOrnithologistandCuratorofTheAsiaticSociety 18 Nibedita Ganguly PreviewofArticlesPublishedonOrnithologicalStudiesinthe Journal of The Asiatic Society of Bengal from1870to1879 21 Basabdutta Chanda îûyöì?w¡y¡!ôöìeîûþ›y!‡îû?ˆê/ !î!î™yíÅ ¤‚@ýÌ¥é 27 ߺþ›lî¤% ForgottenIndianOrnithologist–Dr.SatyaCharanLaw 32 Asok Kanti Sanyal BirdsinIndianArt:AntiquityandImportance 34 Keka Adhikari Banerjee OrnithologicalRepresentationsinIndianArchaeology:ABriefOutline 38 Anuja Bose TheMindofBirds 43 Debashis Banerjee and Anindita Banerjee পাখির দেশে 47 অ쇁ণ 嗁মার চক্রব쇍釀 PreservingAvifaunalDiversityinSantragachiJheel,Howrah,WestBengal,India 50 Advay Mishra BirdsofEastCalcuttaWetlandsandErstwhileMarshySaltLakes 54 Asok Kanti Sanyal BirdsCapturedthroughLensfromSaltLake(Banabitan) 56 Soumitra Chakraborty ReportonReleaseofanAlbumofBirdsintheCollectionofTheAsiaticSociety 60 Sagarika Sur BirdsfromtheArtists’Gallery 63 Anuradha Bysack / Kanchan Pathak / Sagarika Sur / Sneha Agarwal / Rajkumar Mukherjee / Rekha Chakraborty / Arun Kumar Chakraborty BooksfromReader’sChoice 67 সুজা쇍া খমশ্র/ Basabdutta Chanda RareBooksonBirdsintheCollectionofTheAsiaticSociety(ArrangedinChronologicalOrder)
    [Show full text]
  • South Asians and the Theosophical Society, 1879-1930 Maria Moritz
    Globalizing “Sacred Knowledge”: South Asians and the Theosophical Society, 1879-1930 by Maria Moritz a Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Approved Dissertation Committee Professor Harald Fischer-Tiné, ETH Zürich Professor Nicola Spakowski, Universität Freiburg Professor Hans Kippenberg, Jacobs University Bremen Professor Sebastian Conrad, Freie Universität Berlin Date of Defense: 23 March 2012 School of Humanities and Social Sciences Statutory Declaration (on Authorship of a Dissertation) I, Maria-Sofia Moritz, hereby declare that I have written this PhD thesis independently, unless where clearly stated otherwise. I have used only the sources, the data and the support that I have clearly mentioned. This PhD thesis has not been submitted for conferral of degree elsewhere. I confirm that no rights of third parties will be infringed by the publication of this thesis. Berlin, April 27, 2017 Signature ___________________________________________________________ Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. 4 List of Illustrations ............................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]