Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific Vol. 106 1994

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific Vol. 106 1994 Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific Vol. 106 1994 May No. 699 Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 106: 425-435, 1994 May Invited Review Paper Comets Disguised as Asteroids Jane Luu1 Physics Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4060 Electronic mail: [email protected] Received 1993 October 12; accepted 1994 January 24 ABSTRACT. Comets and asteroids were previously thought to be two completely distinct groups of solar- system objects, with marked contrast in both physical and dynamical characteristics. A comet is operationally defined by the presence of a coma, while an asteroid has no coma. However, recent observations have shown that comets can sometimes take on asteroidal appearances and even asteroidal photometric behavior. Thus the observational distinction between comets and asteroids is not as clear cut as it once seemed. The possible presence of comets hidden among known asteroids forces us to reconsider the criterion by which we distinguish comets from asteroids and possibly our inventory of both comet and asteroid populations. 1. INTRODUCTION ets hidden among asteroids. Finally, the Conclusions sum- marize the main ideas presented in the review. This invited review paper is based on a talk given at the 180th American Astronomical Society meeting held in 1992 2. ASTEROIDS June at Columbus, Ohio. Comets and asteroids form two major groups of solar- 2.1 The Main Belt system objects, previously thought to be completely distinct As viewed from the Earth, even the largest asteroid (1 from each other. We identify an object as a comet by its Ceres, diameter 950 km) barely attains an angular diameter coma, an expanding cloud of dust and gas surrounding the of 1 arcsec, and appears marginally resolved in typical ob- nucleus. The coma is created by the sublimation of volatiles serving conditions. Our first close-up glimpse of an asteroid and ejection of entrained dust particles. On the other hand, came in 1991, when the spacecraft Galileo made a close asteroids are ostensibly inert objects; they possess no coma, approach with asteroid 951 Gaspra en route to Jupiter. A and except for the very largest ones, appear unresolved as picture of Gaspra obtained during this encounter is shown in seen from the Earth. Until recently, comets and asteroids Fig. 1. Gaspra is a member of the main asteroid belt with a were thought to share no common characteristic besides the semimajor axis of 2.21 AU. The figure shows an irregularly fact that they both orbit around the Sun. But the last decade shaped body (19X12X11 km) with a rocky surface pock- has seen the emergence of new evidence suggesting that the marked by impact craters (Belton et al. 1992). boundary between comets and asteroids may be much more The majority of asteroids are found in a beltlike distribu- tenuous than previously believed. tion (the "main belt") located between Mars and Jupiter and In this review paper, I will focus on how comets can be effectively marking the boundary between the terrestrial "disguised as asteroids," i.e., how they adopt an asteroidal planets and the gas giants. There is very little mass in the asteroids, compared with the masses of the adjacent planets. appearance and photometric behavior. The paper is intended 21 for the general (nonspecialist) audience. The main goal of the All together, the main belt contains ~3X10 kg, or about 2% of the mass of the Moon and 0.05% that of the Earth. A paper is to show that the observational distinction between third of that mass is in 1 Ceres alone. A sense of the location comets and asteroids is no longer clear, and that the classifi- of asteroids with respect to the planets can be gained from cation of an object as a comet or asteroid, once a trivial task, Fig. 2, which shows a histogram of the asteroid semimajor is no longer a simple matter. The paper begins with a brief axes. introduction to asteroids and comets and their origins. This is The typical orbital periods of main belt asteroids are 3-6 followed by a discussion of how comets can develop aster- yr, and the orbits generally have low eccentricities (^0.1). oidal appearances and the methods by which to identify com- Most asteroid orbits are stable and are subject to only weak planetary perturbations, whose general effect is to make as- 1 Hubble Fellow. teroids oscillate about their mean orbits. As can be seen from 425 © 1994. Astronomical Society of the Pacific © Astronomical Society of the Pacific · Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System 426 LUU every revolution of Jupiter. Repeated dynamical interactions with Jupiter have cleared asteroids from these resonances, and the gaps are commonly known as "Kirkwood gaps." 2.2 Non-Main Belt Asteroids Outside the main belt, there are only a few localized re- gions where asteroids are found. Inward of the belt lie the near-Earth asteroids (NEAs). As their name suggests, they travel on orbits which approach or cross that of the Earth. Beyond the main belt, the Trojan asteroids populate the L4 and L5 Lagrangian points of Jupiter at 5 AU. Beyond Jupiter, we presently only know of three objects classified as "aster- oids": 944 Hidalgo, 5145 Pholus, and 1993 HA2. (Another object in this region, 2060 Chiron, was previously classified as an asteroid but now displays a coma and so is a comet by the operational definition.) These objects travel on chaotic, comet-like orbits. It is the asteroids outside the confines of the main belt which play the most important role in the present discussion, and they will subsequently be discussed Fig. 1—Image of asteroid 951 Gaspra taken by the Galileo spacecraft during in greater detail. its encounter with the asteroid in 1991. The picture was taken from a range of 5300 km, with a resolution of —50 m. Photo courtesy of M. Belton, National Optical Astronomy Observatories (NOAO), for the Jet Propulsion 2.3 Physical Properties of Asteroids Laboratory. Asteroids are collisionally evolved: collisions at high rela- Fig. 2, asteroids are distributed almost throughout the entire tive velocities (~5 kms-1) are the main factor responsible 2-4 AU region, with the exceptions of a few clear gaps, such for the evolution of the asteroid's physical properties. A few as at 2.5 AU (3:1 resonance) and 3.3 AU (2:1 resonance). clusters of asteroids in the main belt ("Hirayama families") Asteroids located at these orbital resonances have a mean have similar orbital parameters and are believed to have motion which is in an exact integer ratio to Jupiter's, e.g., formed from common catastrophic collisions (Hirayama those at the 3:1 resonance complete three revolutions for 1918, 1919). Indeed, much of what we know about asteroid Fig. 2—Histogram of the semimajor axes of known asteroids. Arrows point to the locations of resonances. Figure reprinted from Binzel (1989), courtesy of the University of Arizona Press. © Astronomical Society of the Pacific · Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System COMETS DISGUISED AS ASTEROIDS 427 collisions come from rock-crashing laboratory experiments. Very crudely, the asteroids follow a inverse power-law size distribution described by q N{r)dr^r dr. (1) where r is the radius, N(r)dr is the number density of ob- jects in the radius range r to r + dr, and ^ is a positive power-law index. The power-law index for known asteroids 1:1 ( lies in the range g—2-3, and may depend on the composi- tional types (Gradie et al. 1989). Asteroids are made mainly of refractory material (e.g., 4:3 olivine, silicates, organics, pyroxene, feldspars), although 3:2 iron and nickel also form a large component in the compo- • * ·. · m -, · · sition of some asteroids. Water may also be present, but usu- 0o no -o vf.» r · ally in the form of chemically bound water (e.g., Jones et al. o C) o^· · . · · O ^v··.. _. 1990). Thus asteroids are generally inert bodies, although the largest asteroids may be able to sustain seasonal "atmo- spheres" by means of sublimating polar caps, as has been 0 suggested for asteroid 1 Ceres (A'Hearn and Feldman 1992). Ο The main belt is roughly divided into three compositional zones (see Fig. 1 of Bell et al. 1989). These compositional zones correspond to clusters of different taxonomic types: at the inner belt (heliocentric distance —2-2.3 AU) we find mostly "S"-type asteroids, then "C"-types further out (i?—2.3-2.8 AU). At the edge of the belt and beyond (ft >2.7 AU), the "P"- and "D"-types dominate. The S-types have moderate to high albedos and a composition of metal, oliv- 0.2 0.6 ine, and pyroxene. The C-types have low albedos and show signs of aqueous alterations. P- and D-types are dark and seem to contain no hydrated minerals, as inferred from their Fig. 3—The distinction between cornets and asteroids in semimajor axis- lack of the 3 μτη water absorption feature (e.g., Jones et al. eccentricity space. The open circles are asteroids, while the solid circles are 1990). The lack of hydrated minerals may indicate that the P- comets. The sizes of the circles and dots are proportional to the sizes of the and D-types have never been sufficiently heated for interior objects. Figure adapted from Kresak (1979) and Weissman et al. (1989), ice to melt. The P- and D-types are thus considered "primi- courtesy of the University of Arizona Press. tive" asteroids. There are also minor asteroid classes, the number and definition of which depend on the particular most of the asteroids were fragmented upon impact and some classification scheme (e.g., Tholen 1984; Barucci et al.
Recommended publications
  • Surface Characteristics of Transneptunian Objects and Centaurs from Photometry and Spectroscopy
    Barucci et al.: Surface Characteristics of TNOs and Centaurs 647 Surface Characteristics of Transneptunian Objects and Centaurs from Photometry and Spectroscopy M. A. Barucci and A. Doressoundiram Observatoire de Paris D. P. Cruikshank NASA Ames Research Center The external region of the solar system contains a vast population of small icy bodies, be- lieved to be remnants from the accretion of the planets. The transneptunian objects (TNOs) and Centaurs (located between Jupiter and Neptune) are probably made of the most primitive and thermally unprocessed materials of the known solar system. Although the study of these objects has rapidly evolved in the past few years, especially from dynamical and theoretical points of view, studies of the physical and chemical properties of the TNO population are still limited by the faintness of these objects. The basic properties of these objects, including infor- mation on their dimensions and rotation periods, are presented, with emphasis on their diver- sity and the possible characteristics of their surfaces. 1. INTRODUCTION cally with even the largest telescopes. The physical char- acteristics of Centaurs and TNOs are still in a rather early Transneptunian objects (TNOs), also known as Kuiper stage of investigation. Advances in instrumentation on tele- belt objects (KBOs) and Edgeworth-Kuiper belt objects scopes of 6- to 10-m aperture have enabled spectroscopic (EKBOs), are presumed to be remnants of the solar nebula studies of an increasing number of these objects, and signifi- that have survived over the age of the solar system. The cant progress is slowly being made. connection of the short-period comets (P < 200 yr) of low We describe here photometric and spectroscopic studies orbital inclination and the transneptunian population of pri- of TNOs and the emerging results.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Bodies of the Solar System Don Yeomans
    news and views teakre Small bodies of the Solar System Don Yeomans ,-.......-..-.- "_.."..._..".."....".._..I........... ".........._ "_.""".." ".......... " "............_..._.." ....".."-..- ..-.... "....""... Discoveries of comets that behave like asteroids and asteroids that behave like comets are making us reassess our view of Earth's smallest neighbours. cientists have a strong urge to place Mother Nature's objects into neat Sboxes. For most of the past halfcentury, the comets and asteroids of the Solar System did seem to belong in two separate popula- tions -each within their own box. The rules werethatcomets,withawiderangeoforbits, were solid, dirty iceballs originating in the so-called Oort cloud at theedge of the Solar System. Asteroids were definedas bitsofrock anfimed mostly to a region between Mars and Jupiter and travelling roughly in the same plane and inthe same direction as the planets about theSun (Fig. 1).Fromtjme to Lime over the past 50 years, objects were bund that did not really belong in either )OX, but they were onlyconsidered as occa- iional exceptions to the rules. Within the Figure 1 The usual view of corneta and utcroida. The inna Soh System cuntlinr the Sun and the ,ast few years, however,Mother Nature has four terreatrid planar:Mercury, Venu%Euth and Ma.fie lump of mdc that make up thenuin ticked over the boxes entirely, spilling the asteroid bdt between him and Jupiterorbit the Sun in the meplane andthe medirection PJ the :ontents and demanding thatscientists rec- planets. Most tometa have highly dlipticnl orbits, whichmeans they spend most of their timein the )gnizE crossover objects - asteroids that outer reache of the Solar System with only briefpasages dose to the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Ice in 2060 Chiron and Its Implications for Centaurs and Kuiper Belt Objects
    Water Ice in 2060 Chiron and its Implications for Centaurs and Kuiper Belt Objects Jane X. Luu Sterrewacht Leiden Postbus 9513, 2300RA Leiden, The Netherlands David C. Jewitt1 Institute for Astronomy 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 and Chad Trujillo1 Institute for Astronomy 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 Received ; accepted Submitted to Ap. J. Letters, accepted 31 Jan 2000 1Visiting Astronomer, W. M. Keck Observatory, jointly operated by California Institute of Technology and the University of California. –2– ABSTRACT We report the detection of water ice in the Centaur 2060 Chiron, based on near-infrared spectra (1.0 - 2.5 µm) taken with the 3.8-meter United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) and the 10-meter Keck Telescope. The appearance of this ice is correlated with the recent decline in Chiron’s cometary activity: the decrease in the coma cross-section allows previously hidden solid-state surface features to be seen. We predict that water ice is ubiquitous among Centaurs and Kuiper Belt objects, but its surface coverage varies from object to object, and thus determines its detectability and the occurrence of cometary activity. Subject headings: comets – Kuiper Belt – solar system: formation 1. Introduction The Centaurs are a set of solar system objects whose orbits are confined between those of Jupiter and Neptune. Their planet-crossing orbits imply a short dynamical lifetime (106 107 yr). The current belief is that Centaurs are objects scattered from the Kuiper − Belt that may eventually end up in the inner solar system as short-period comets. The first discovered and brightest known Centaur, 2060 Chiron, is relatively well studied.
    [Show full text]
  • And the Alpha Capricornid Shower P
    TB, MG, AJ/328991/ART, 20/03/2010 The Astronomical Journal, 139:1–9, 2010 ??? doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/1/1 C 2010. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. MINOR PLANET 2002 EX12 (=169P/NEAT) AND THE ALPHA CAPRICORNID SHOWER P. Jenniskens1 and J. Vaubaillon2 1 SETI Institute, 515 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA; [email protected] 2 I.M.C.C.E., Paris Observatory, 77 Av. Denfert Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France Received 2009 August 20; accepted 2010 February 4; published 2010 ??? ABSTRACT Minor planet 2002 EX12 (=comet 169P/NEAT) is identified as the parent body of the alpha Capricornid shower, based on a good agreement in the calculated and observed direction and speed of the approaching meteoroids for ejecta 4500–5000 years ago. The meteoroids that come to within 0.05 AU of Earth’s orbit show the correct radiant position, radiant drift, approach speed, radiant dispersion, duration of activity, and distribution of dust at the other node, but meteoroids ejected 5000 years ago by previously proposed parent bodies do not. A more recent formation epoch is excluded because not enough dust would have evolved into Earth’s path. The total mass of the stream is about 9 × 1013 kg, similar to that of the remaining comet. Release of so much matter in a short period of time implies a major disruption of the comet at that time. The bulk of this matter still passes inside Earth’s orbit, but will cross Earth’s orbit 300 years from now.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comet's Tale
    THE COMET’S TALE Journal of the Comet Section of the British Astronomical Association Number 33, 2014 January Not the Comet of the Century 2013 R1 (Lovejoy) imaged by Damian Peach on 2013 December 24 using 106mm F5. STL-11k. LRGB. L: 7x2mins. RGB: 1x2mins. Today’s images of bright binocular comets rival drawings of Great Comets of the nineteenth century. Rather predictably the expected comet of the century Contents failed to materialise, however several of the other comets mentioned in the last issue, together with the Comet Section contacts 2 additional surprise shown above, put on good From the Director 2 appearances. 2011 L4 (PanSTARRS), 2012 F6 From the Secretary 3 (Lemmon), 2012 S1 (ISON) and 2013 R1 (Lovejoy) all Tales from the past 5 th became brighter than 6 magnitude and 2P/Encke, 2012 RAS meeting report 6 K5 (LINEAR), 2012 L2 (LINEAR), 2012 T5 (Bressi), Comet Section meeting report 9 2012 V2 (LINEAR), 2012 X1 (LINEAR), and 2013 V3 SPA meeting - Rob McNaught 13 (Nevski) were all binocular objects. Whether 2014 will Professional tales 14 bring such riches remains to be seen, but three comets The Legacy of Comet Hunters 16 are predicted to come within binocular range and we Project Alcock update 21 can hope for some new discoveries. We should get Review of observations 23 some spectacular close-up images of 67P/Churyumov- Prospects for 2014 44 Gerasimenko from the Rosetta spacecraft. BAA COMET SECTION NEWSLETTER 2 THE COMET’S TALE Comet Section contacts Director: Jonathan Shanklin, 11 City Road, CAMBRIDGE. CB1 1DP England. Phone: (+44) (0)1223 571250 (H) or (+44) (0)1223 221482 (W) Fax: (+44) (0)1223 221279 (W) E-Mail: [email protected] or [email protected] WWW page : http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jds/ Assistant Director (Observations): Guy Hurst, 16 Westminster Close, Kempshott Rise, BASINGSTOKE, Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Uhm Ms 3980 R.Pdf
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I LIBRARY The Enigmatic Surface of(3200) Phaethon: Comparison with cometary candidates A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ASTRONOMY August 2005 By Luke R. Dundon Thesis Committee: K. Meech, Chairperson S. Bus D. Tholen To my parents, David and Colleen Dundon. III Acknowledgments lowe much gratitude to my advisor, Karen Meech, as well as the other members of my thesis committee, Dave Tholen and Bobby Bus. Karen, among many other things, trained me in the art of data reduction and good observing technique, as well as successful writing of telescope proposals. Bobby helped me perform productive near-IR spectral observation and subsequent data reduction. Dave provided keen analytical insight throughout the entire process of my project. With the tremendous guidance, expertise and advice of my committee, I was able to complete this project. They were always willing to aid me through my most difficult dilemmas. This work would not have been possible without their help. Thanks is also due to numerous people at the !fA who have helped me through my project in various ways. Dave Jewitt was always available to offer practical scientific advice, as well as numerous data reduction strategies. Van Fernandez allowed me to use a few of his numerous IDL programs for lightcurve analysis and spectral reduction. His advice was also quite insightful and helped focus my own thought processes. Jana Pittichova guided me through the initial stages of learning how to observe, which was crucial for my successful observations of (3200) Phaethon in the Fall of 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Centaurs and Jupiter Family Comets with Implications for K-Pg-Type Impacts K
    1 The Relationship between Centaurs and Jupiter Family Comets with Implications for K-Pg-type Impacts K. R. Grazier1*†, J. Horner2, J. C. Castillo-Rogez3 1United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, United States 2Centre for Astrophysics, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia 3Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States. *Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] †Now at NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, United States Centaurs—icy bodies orbiting beyond Jupiter and interior to Neptune—are believed to be dynamically related to Jupiter Family Comets (JFCs), which have aphelia near Jupiter’s orbit, and perihelia in the inner Solar System. Previous dynamical simulations have recreated the Centaur/JFC conversion, but the mechanism behind that process remains poorly described. We have performed a numerical simulation of Centaur analogues that recreates this process, generating a dataset detailing over 2.6 million close planet/planetesimal interactions. We explore scenarios stored within that database and, from those, describe the mechanism by which Centaur objects are converted into JFCs. Because many JFCs have perihelia in the terrestrial planet region, and since Centaurs are constantly resupplied from the Scattered Disk and other reservoirs, the JFCs are an ever-present impact threat. Keywords: dynamical evolution and stability, celestial mechanics, comets, asteroids 1. Introduction Over the past decade, a number of studies have brought into question the long-held belief that Jupiter acts to shield the Earth from comet impacts. The work of Wetherill (1994, 1995), who studied the influence of the giant planets in clearing debris from the outer Solar System, is often heralded as the source of the “Jupiter: the Shield” paradigm, and was one of the core tenets of the Rare Earth hypothesis of Ward & Brownlee (2000) who popularized the notion.
    [Show full text]
  • King David's Altar in Jerusalem Dated by the Bright Appearance of Comet
    Annals of Archaeology Volume 1, Issue 1, 2018, PP 30-37 King David’s Altar in Jerusalem Dated by the Bright Appearance of Comet Encke in 964 BC Göran Henriksson Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden *Corresponding Author: Göran Henriksson, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE 751 20 Uppsala, [email protected] ABSTRACT At the time corresponding to our end of May and beginning of June in 964 BC a bright comet with a very long tail dominated the night sky of the northern hemisphere. It was Comet Encke that was very bright during the Bronze Age, but today it is scarcely visible to the naked eye. It first appeared as a small comet close to the zenith, but for every night it became greater and brighter and moved slowly to the north with its tail pointing southwards. In the first week of June the tail was stretched out across the whole sky and at midnight it was visible close to the meridian. In this paper the author wishes to test the hypothesis that this appearance of Comet Encke corresponds to the motion in the sky above Jerusalem of “the sword of the Angel of the Lord”, mentioned in 1 Chronicles, in the Old Testament. Encke was first circumpolar and finally set at the northern horizon on 8 June in 964 BC at 22. This happened according to the historical chronology between 965 and 960 BC. The calculations of the orbit of Comet Encke have been performed by a computer program developed by the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice & Stone 2020
    Ice & Stone 2020 WEEK 17: APRIL 19-25, 2020 Presented by The Earthrise Institute # 17 Authored by Alan Hale This week in history APRIL 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APRIL 20, 1910: Comet 1P/Halley passes through perihelion at a heliocentric distance of 0.587 AU. Halley’s 1910 return, which is described in a previous “Special Topics” presentation, was quite favorable, with a close approach to Earth (0.15 AU) and the exhibiting of the longest cometary tail ever recorded. APRIL 20, 2025: NASA’s Lucy mission is scheduled to pass by the main belt asteroid (52246) Donaldjohanson. Lucy is discussed in a previous “Special Topics” presentation. APRIL 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APRIL 21, 2024: Comet 12P/Pons-Brooks is predicted to pass through perihelion at a heliocentric distance of 0.781 AU. This comet, with a discussion of its viewing prospects for 2024, is a previous “Comet of the Week.” APRIL 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APRIL 22, 2020: The annual Lyrid meteor shower should be at its peak. Normally this shower is fairly weak, with a peak rate of not much more than 10 meteors per hour, but has been known to exhibit significantly stronger activity on occasion. The moon is at its “new” phase on April 23 this year and thus the viewing circumstances are very good. COVER IMAGE CREDIT: Front and back cover: This artist’s conception shows how families of asteroids are created. Over the history of our solar system, catastrophic collisions between asteroids located in the belt between Mars and Jupiter have formed families of objects on similar orbits around the sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Disk-Resolved Optical Spectra of Near-Earth Asteroid 25143 Itokawa with Hayabusa/AMICA Observations
    발표논문 초록 (태양계) [구SS-01] Disk-Resolved Optical Spectra of Near-Earth Asteroid 25143 Itokawa with Hayabusa/AMICA observations Masateru Ishiguro Seoul National University The Hayabusa mission successfully rendezvoused with its target asteroid 25143 Itokawa in 2005 and brought the asteroidal sample to the Earth in 2009. This mission enabled to connect the S-type asteroids to ordinary chondrites, the counterpart meteorites which exist in near Earth orbit. Recent finding of a fragment from 25143 Itokawa [1] suggested that the asteroid experienced an impact after the injection to the near-Earth orbit. In this presentation, we investigated the evidence of the recent impact on 25143 Itokawa using the onboard camera, AMICA. AMICA took more than 1400 images of Itokawa during the rendezvous phase. It is reported that AMICA images are highly contaminated by lights scattered inside the optics in the longer wavelength. We developed a technique to subtract the scattered light by determining the point spread functions for all available channels. As the result, we first succeeded in the determination of the surface spectra in all available bands. We consider a most fresh-looking compact crater, Kamoi, is a possible impact site. [1] Ohtsuka, K., Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 63, 6, L73-L77 [구SS-02] Dynamical Evolution of the Dark Asteroids with Tisserand parameter 김윤영1, Masateru Ishiguro2, 정진훈2, 양홍규2, Fumihiko Usui3 1 이화여자대학교 물리학과, 2서울대학교 물리천문학부, 3우주과학연구소 (일본) It has been speculated that there could be dormant or extinct comets in the list of known asteroids, which appear asteroidal but are icy bodies originating from outer solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Florida Astronomical Society SWFAS the Eyepiece
    Southwest Florida Astronomical Society SWFAS The Eyepiece February 2017 Contents: Message from the President .............................................................................. Page 1 Program this Month ......................................................................................... Page 2 Photos by Chuck and Matthew ........................................................................... Page 2 In the Sky this Month ...................................................................................... Page 3 Future Events ................................................................................................. Page 4 Bright Comet Prospects for 2017 ........................................................................ Page 6 Comet Campaign: Amateurs Wanted? ................................................................ Page 14 Club Officers & Positions .................................................................................. Page 16 A MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT I hope everyone is having a good new year. We are now into our heaviest period for public events. On the 11th we have STEMtastic/Edison Day of Discovery downtown. On the 25th we will be at Rotary Park in Cape Coral for the Burrowing Owl Festival. Both of these events are solar observing and displays/handouts. We can use help with these events. You don’t need to bring a scope or even be familiar with solar observing. There is a lot of public interaction and we need people for that. As a followup to the BOF, we will have a public star
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Shapes of Asteroids in Cometary Orbits Based on 0.7M Telescope Imaging
    Orbital Shapes of Asteroids in Cometary Orbits based on 0.7m Telescope Imaging 1,2,3 2,3 S Dueantakhu , S Wannawichian 1 Graduate School, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 2 Department of physics and Materials Science, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 3 National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand(NARIT), Chiang Mai, Thailand E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The study of orbital elements of Asteroids in Cometary Orbits (ACOs) is based on images taken by a 0.7-m telescope to find positions of asteroids and calculate their orbital elements. This work focuses on variation of positions and orbital shape of an asteroid, 1667Pels, which is obtained by analyzing orbital elements and minimum orbital intersection distances. Each observation, those parameters are affected by the gravity from Jupiter on ACOs. The accuracy of single site data was calibrated by comparing the result from this work to other observations in Minor Planet Center database. 1. Introduction Asteroids are members of minor planet group. Some of their movements are affected by giant planets, especially Jupiter, which make orbits of asteroids highly variable. The three-body problem is the major case for discussion about position of planet and its satellite. For asteroid, it is a special case that is called restricted three-body problem [3] because it has infinitesimal mass and moves in the gravitational field of the sun and giant planets. Solution of restricted three-body problem is [3] " " " "(()*) "* � = � + � + + − � (1) , , - . Where � is the speed of the infinitesimal mass. � and � are position of the mass. �(and �" are positioning vectors of the mass, � is mass of secondary body and 1 − � is mass of primary body � is Jacobi's integral parameter, � is a planet and 1 − � is the Sun.
    [Show full text]