DOCSLIB.ORG

King David's Altar in Jerusalem Dated by the Bright Appearance of Comet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Annals of Archaeology Volume 1, Issue 1, 2018, PP 30-37 King David’s Altar in Jerusalem Dated by the Bright Appearance of Comet Encke in 964 BC Göran Henriksson Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden *Corresponding Author: Göran Henriksson, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE 751 20 Uppsala, [email protected] ABSTRACT At the time corresponding to our end of May and beginning of June in 964 BC a bright comet with a very long tail dominated the night sky of the northern hemisphere. It was Comet Encke that was very bright during the Bronze Age, but today it is scarcely visible to the naked eye. It first appeared as a small comet close to the zenith, but for every night it became greater and brighter and moved slowly to the north with its tail pointing southwards. In the first week of June the tail was stretched out across the whole sky and at midnight it was visible close to the meridian. In this paper the author wishes to test the hypothesis that this appearance of Comet Encke corresponds to the motion in the sky above Jerusalem of “the sword of the Angel of the Lord”, mentioned in 1 Chronicles, in the Old Testament. Encke was first circumpolar and finally set at the northern horizon on 8 June in 964 BC at 22. This happened according to the historical chronology between 965 and 960 BC. The calculations of the orbit of Comet Encke have been performed by a computer program developed by the author. It has been calibrated from depictions on Swedish rock- carvings, Chinese texts and Sumerian cylinder seals and gives useful results at least back to 2654 BC. Keywords: Comet Encke, orbit integration, non-gravitational forces, David’s Altar, sword of the Angel of the Lord, Swedish rock-carvings, Chinese texts, Old Testament. mentioned with enough characteristic details to INTRODUCTION be uniquely identified as a known astronomical The absolute chronologies for the early Near object. Eastern cultures have been dependent on In an earlier paper, (Henriksson 2013), I have identifiable solar eclipses that have taken place used both a solar eclipse and a bright during a known year of rule of a certain king. If appearance of Comet Encke to date the Assyrian there exist a series of years of rule for kings in a King Sennaherib‟s attack in the land of Juda and country it is enough to get a single absolute year his attempt to conquer Jerusalem in 702-700 to convert the relative years to absolute years. BC. Furthermore, if a specific common year is known in relation to a king in another country, In another well-known situation, during the end an absolute chronology can also be achieved for of rule of King David, a frightening celestial that country. With this technique a common phenomena appeared above Jerusalem described absolute chronology for the Eastern as “the sword of the Angel of the Lord”. It has Mediterranean countries have been established been interpreted as the appearance of a bright during the last 200 years by a cooperation comet. Some authors have tried to identify this between historians and astronomers. I have also as Halley‟s comet as this was the only bright contributed to this during the last 20 years periodic comet known. (Henriksson 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008). THE SEARCH FOR AN EARLY BRIGHT Unfortunately, for the early history there exist COMET periods without solar eclipses preserved in the D. Justin Schove and Alan Fletcher (1987) written sources and with no reliable links write: “The early dates of Halley‟s comet have between time of rule even for important kings. been estimated by various methods with In these cases one can try to use other important inconsistent results. Schove 1955, 288 noted astronomical phenomena such as the appearance that there were 8 appearances in a millennium, of a bright supernova or a bright comet that are so that extrapolating backwards from AD Annals of Archaeology V1● I1● 2018 30 King David’s Altar in Jerusalem Dated by the Bright Appearance of Comet Encke in 964 Bc 2066±, 1066 and 66 he reached –934 or 935±5 was possible to establish roughly the plane of BC and queried whether 965 BC would be a the orbit and direction of perihelion for P/Encke suitable date for the comet of David that pointed over this interval of time. All but about 40 of the to Ornan‟s threshing-floor and led to the objects could be eliminated by comparing the building of the Temple at Jerusalem.” observed locations with possible locations of P/Encke. ….. Large uncertainties in the non- With these speculative calculations an Newtonian motion as yet prevent our certain astronomer should have a very low profile in identification of P/Encke among the remaining relation to the historical chronologies based on possibilities.” After the failure of this very comparisons with the known history of competent and ambitious attempt to identify neighboring countries even if the exact year is Encke among the detailed Chinese observation not known. A great effort to solve the problem records this problem has been considered to be with the many early indications of passages of a impossible to solve. bright comet was made by Donald K. Yeomans and Tao King (1981) when they performed an In 1994, after identification of many total solar ambitious integration of the orbit of Halley‟s eclipses on the Swedish rock-carving from the comet back to 1404 BC. They had to stop that Bronze Age (1800-500BC), I started an year because of a very close encounter with the investigation of the great number of depictions earth that made further calculations useless. of possible bright comets. The result was that all They assumed that the comet‟s non-gravitational the investigated depictions of comets can be forces remained constant from one appearance identified as Comet Encke. Fortunately, at that to the next. Nowadays, after a detailed study of time I did not know about the problems with the the Chinese and other sources, the earliest calculation of the early orbit of Encke and that it known observation of Comet Halley was made was considered as “impossible” to solve. in 240 BC. This seems to be the first appearance The identification of Encke‟s comet on the of Comet Halley in the inner solar system. Swedish rock-carvings is of course interesting In this paper I have identified David‟s comet as for the dating of them, but it is of more general Comet Encke which is expected to have been importance for the study of the evolution of extremely bright during the Bronze Age. The Encke‟s orbit and the possibility to establish problem was that it has not earlier been possible absolute chronologies for ancient cultures. A to calculate a useful orbit before 1786 when it short description of my method to calculate the was discovered with a telescope by Pierre orbit of Comet Encke and some details about the Méchain. Johann Franz Encke realized that the identified passages around 1000 BC, including a same comet had been observed in 1795, 1805 mentioning of Comet Encke in the oldest and 1818 and he computed its first orbit in 1819. Chinese cometary text, are discussed at the end This was a very difficult and laborious task and of this paper. therefore the comet was named “Encke” to honour him. The period of Encke is 3.3 years COMET ENCKE AS THE SWORD OF THE and it moves always in the inner part of the solar ANGEL OF THE LORD system and its orbit is perturbed by many I want to test the hypothesis that the motion in planets. It has weakened since the Bronze Age the sky above Jerusalem of “the sword of the and there seems to have been no observation Angel of the Lord”, mentioned in 1 Chronicles, between 1600 and 1786. It has been very in the Old Testament, was a description of difficult to determine the evolution of the non- Comet Encke‟s appearance at the end of May gravitational forces that perturbs its orbit. This and beginning of June 964 BC when it first was makes the calculations very uncertain. circumpolar and finally sets at the northern These non-gravitational accelerations are due to horizon of Jerusalem. This date is in good the rocket effect of outgassing volatiles from the agreement with known facts. icy-conglomerate nucleus proposed by Fred It is written in 1 Chronicles 21:15-16, "And God Whipple (1950). The title of his paper is: “A sent an angel to Jerusalem to destroy it, but as comet model I. The acceleration of comet he prepared to destroy it, the LORD looked and Encke”. When this model was further relented from the calamity. And He said to the developed, Whipple and Hamid (1972) tried to angel bringing the destruction, „It is enough. use it to find Comet Encke among the more than Remove your hand.‟ The angel of the LORD 300 early Chinese records of comets. They write was then standing by the threshing floor of in the abstract: “Using the Gauss-Hill method it Ornan the Jebusite. 21:16: Then David lifted up 31 Annals of Archaeology V1● I1● 2018 King David’s Altar in Jerusalem Dated by the Bright Appearance of Comet Encke in 964 Bc his eyes and saw the angel of the LORD became the Altar for the Great Temple that later standing between earth and heaven with his was built by his son Solomon.
Recommended publications
  • The Comet's Tale, and Therefore the Object As a Whole Would the Section Director Nick James Highlighted Have a Low Surface Brightness

    The Comet's Tale, and Therefore the Object As a Whole Would the Section Director Nick James Highlighted Have a Low Surface Brightness

    1 Diebold Schilling, Disaster in connection with two comets sighted in 1456, Lucerne Chronicle, 1513 (Wikimedia Commons) THE COMET’S TALE Comet Section – British Astronomical Association Journal – Number 38 2019 June britastro.org/comet Evolution of the comet C/2016 R2 (PANSTARRS) along a total of ten days on January 2018. Composition of pictures taken with a zoom lens from Teide Observatory in Canary Islands. J.J Chambó Bris 2 Table of Contents Contents Author Page 1 Director’s Welcome Nick James 3 Section Director 2 Melvyn Taylor’s Alex Pratt 6 Observations of Comet C/1995 01 (Hale-Bopp) 3 The Enigma of Neil Norman 9 Comet Encke 4 Setting up the David Swan 14 C*Hyperstar for Imaging Comets 5 Comet Software Owen Brazell 19 6 Pro-Am José Joaquín Chambó Bris 25 Astrophotography of Comets 7 Elizabeth Roemer: A Denis Buczynski 28 Consummate Comet Section Secretary Observer 8 Historical Cometary Amar A Sharma 37 Observations in India: Part 2 – Mughal Empire 16th and 17th Century 9 Dr Reginald Denis Buczynski 42 Waterfield and His Section Secretary Medals 10 Contacts 45 Picture Gallery Please note that copyright 46 of all images belongs with the Observer 3 1 From the Director – Nick James I hope you enjoy reading this issue of the We have had a couple of relatively bright Comet’s Tale. Many thanks to Janice but diffuse comets through the winter and McClean for editing this issue and to Denis there are plenty of images of Buczynski for soliciting contributions. 46P/Wirtanen and C/2018 Y1 (Iwamoto) Thanks also to the section committee for in our archive.
  • How We Found About COMETS

    How We Found About COMETS

    How we found about COMETS Isaac Asimov Isaac Asimov is a master storyteller, one of the world’s greatest writers of science fiction. He is also a noted expert on the history of scientific development, with a gift for explaining the wonders of science to non- experts, both young and old. These stories are science-facts, but just as readable as science fiction.Before we found out about comets, the superstitious thought they were signs of bad times ahead. The ancient Greeks called comets “aster kometes” meaning hairy stars. Even to the modern day astronomer, these nomads of the solar system remain a puzzle. Isaac Asimov makes a difficult subject understandable and enjoyable to read. 1. The hairy stars Human beings have been watching the sky at night for many thousands of years because it is so beautiful. For one thing, there are thousands of stars scattered over the sky, some brighter than others. These stars make a pattern that is the same night after night and that slowly turns in a smooth and regular way. There is the Moon, which does not seem a mere dot of light like the stars, but a larger body. Sometimes it is a perfect circle of light but at other times it is a different shape—a half circle or a curved crescent. It moves against the stars from night to night. One midnight, it could be near a particular star, and the next midnight, quite far away from that star. There are also visible 5 star-like objects that are brighter than the stars.
  • Small Bodies of the Solar System Don Yeomans

    Small Bodies of the Solar System Don Yeomans

    news and views teakre Small bodies of the Solar System Don Yeomans ,-.......-..-.- "_.."..._..".."....".._..I........... ".........._ "_.""".." ".......... " "............_..._.." ....".."-..- ..-.... "....""... Discoveries of comets that behave like asteroids and asteroids that behave like comets are making us reassess our view of Earth's smallest neighbours. cientists have a strong urge to place Mother Nature's objects into neat Sboxes. For most of the past halfcentury, the comets and asteroids of the Solar System did seem to belong in two separate popula- tions -each within their own box. The rules werethatcomets,withawiderangeoforbits, were solid, dirty iceballs originating in the so-called Oort cloud at theedge of the Solar System. Asteroids were definedas bitsofrock anfimed mostly to a region between Mars and Jupiter and travelling roughly in the same plane and inthe same direction as the planets about theSun (Fig. 1).Fromtjme to Lime over the past 50 years, objects were bund that did not really belong in either )OX, but they were onlyconsidered as occa- iional exceptions to the rules. Within the Figure 1 The usual view of corneta and utcroida. The inna Soh System cuntlinr the Sun and the ,ast few years, however,Mother Nature has four terreatrid planar:Mercury, Venu%Euth and Ma.fie lump of mdc that make up thenuin ticked over the boxes entirely, spilling the asteroid bdt between him and Jupiterorbit the Sun in the meplane andthe medirection PJ the :ontents and demanding thatscientists rec- planets. Most tometa have highly dlipticnl orbits, whichmeans they spend most of their timein the )gnizE crossover objects - asteroids that outer reache of the Solar System with only briefpasages dose to the Sun.
  • The Comet's Tale

    The Comet's Tale

    THE COMET’S TALE Journal of the Comet Section of the British Astronomical Association Number 33, 2014 January Not the Comet of the Century 2013 R1 (Lovejoy) imaged by Damian Peach on 2013 December 24 using 106mm F5. STL-11k. LRGB. L: 7x2mins. RGB: 1x2mins. Today’s images of bright binocular comets rival drawings of Great Comets of the nineteenth century. Rather predictably the expected comet of the century Contents failed to materialise, however several of the other comets mentioned in the last issue, together with the Comet Section contacts 2 additional surprise shown above, put on good From the Director 2 appearances. 2011 L4 (PanSTARRS), 2012 F6 From the Secretary 3 (Lemmon), 2012 S1 (ISON) and 2013 R1 (Lovejoy) all Tales from the past 5 th became brighter than 6 magnitude and 2P/Encke, 2012 RAS meeting report 6 K5 (LINEAR), 2012 L2 (LINEAR), 2012 T5 (Bressi), Comet Section meeting report 9 2012 V2 (LINEAR), 2012 X1 (LINEAR), and 2013 V3 SPA meeting - Rob McNaught 13 (Nevski) were all binocular objects. Whether 2014 will Professional tales 14 bring such riches remains to be seen, but three comets The Legacy of Comet Hunters 16 are predicted to come within binocular range and we Project Alcock update 21 can hope for some new discoveries. We should get Review of observations 23 some spectacular close-up images of 67P/Churyumov- Prospects for 2014 44 Gerasimenko from the Rosetta spacecraft. BAA COMET SECTION NEWSLETTER 2 THE COMET’S TALE Comet Section contacts Director: Jonathan Shanklin, 11 City Road, CAMBRIDGE. CB1 1DP England. Phone: (+44) (0)1223 571250 (H) or (+44) (0)1223 221482 (W) Fax: (+44) (0)1223 221279 (W) E-Mail: [email protected] or [email protected] WWW page : http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jds/ Assistant Director (Observations): Guy Hurst, 16 Westminster Close, Kempshott Rise, BASINGSTOKE, Hampshire.
  • Ice & Stone 2020

    Ice & Stone 2020

    Ice & Stone 2020 WEEK 17: APRIL 19-25, 2020 Presented by The Earthrise Institute # 17 Authored by Alan Hale This week in history APRIL 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APRIL 20, 1910: Comet 1P/Halley passes through perihelion at a heliocentric distance of 0.587 AU. Halley’s 1910 return, which is described in a previous “Special Topics” presentation, was quite favorable, with a close approach to Earth (0.15 AU) and the exhibiting of the longest cometary tail ever recorded. APRIL 20, 2025: NASA’s Lucy mission is scheduled to pass by the main belt asteroid (52246) Donaldjohanson. Lucy is discussed in a previous “Special Topics” presentation. APRIL 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APRIL 21, 2024: Comet 12P/Pons-Brooks is predicted to pass through perihelion at a heliocentric distance of 0.781 AU. This comet, with a discussion of its viewing prospects for 2024, is a previous “Comet of the Week.” APRIL 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APRIL 22, 2020: The annual Lyrid meteor shower should be at its peak. Normally this shower is fairly weak, with a peak rate of not much more than 10 meteors per hour, but has been known to exhibit significantly stronger activity on occasion. The moon is at its “new” phase on April 23 this year and thus the viewing circumstances are very good. COVER IMAGE CREDIT: Front and back cover: This artist’s conception shows how families of asteroids are created. Over the history of our solar system, catastrophic collisions between asteroids located in the belt between Mars and Jupiter have formed families of objects on similar orbits around the sun.
  • 45-68 Verdun

    45-68 Verdun

    | The Determination of the Solar Parallax from Transits of Venus in the 18th Century | 45 | The Determination of the Solar Parallax from Transits of Venus in the 18 th Century Andreas VERDUN * Manuscript received September 28, 200 4, accepted October 30, 2004 T Abstract The transits of Venus in 1761 and 1769 initiated the first global observation campaigns performed with international cooperation. The goal of these campaigns was the determination of the solar parallax with high precision. Enormous efforts were made to send expeditions to the most distant and then still unknown regions of the Earth to measure the instants of contact of the transits. The determination of the exact value of the solar parallax from these observations was not only of scientific importance, but it was expected to improve the astronomical tables which were used, e.g., for naviga - tion. Hundreds of single measurements were acquired. The astronomers, however, were faced by a new problem: How is such a small quantity like the solar parallax to be derived from observations deteriorated by measuring errors? Is it possible to determine the solar parallax with an accuracy of 0.02" as asserted by Halley? Only a few scientists accepted this chal - lenge, but without adequate processing methods this was a hopeless undertaking. Parameter estimation methods had to be developed at first. The procedures used by Leonhard Euler and Achille-Pierre Dionis Duséjour were similar to modern methods and therefore superior to all other traditional methods. Their results were confirmed by Simon Newcomb at the end of the 1 9th century, thus proving the success of these campaigns.
  • Southwest Florida Astronomical Society SWFAS the Eyepiece

    Southwest Florida Astronomical Society SWFAS the Eyepiece

    Southwest Florida Astronomical Society SWFAS The Eyepiece February 2017 Contents: Message from the President .............................................................................. Page 1 Program this Month ......................................................................................... Page 2 Photos by Chuck and Matthew ........................................................................... Page 2 In the Sky this Month ...................................................................................... Page 3 Future Events ................................................................................................. Page 4 Bright Comet Prospects for 2017 ........................................................................ Page 6 Comet Campaign: Amateurs Wanted? ................................................................ Page 14 Club Officers & Positions .................................................................................. Page 16 A MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT I hope everyone is having a good new year. We are now into our heaviest period for public events. On the 11th we have STEMtastic/Edison Day of Discovery downtown. On the 25th we will be at Rotary Park in Cape Coral for the Burrowing Owl Festival. Both of these events are solar observing and displays/handouts. We can use help with these events. You don’t need to bring a scope or even be familiar with solar observing. There is a lot of public interaction and we need people for that. As a followup to the BOF, we will have a public star
  • Gotthold Eisenstein and Philosopher John

    Gotthold Eisenstein and Philosopher John

    Gotthold Eisenstein and Philosopher John Franz Lemmermeyer Abstract Before the recent publication of the correspondence between Gauss and Encke, nothing was known about the role that John Taylor, a cotton merchant from Liverpool, had played in the life of Gotthold Eisenstein. In this article, we will bring together what we have discovered about John Taylor’s life. Eisenstein’s Journey to England Gotthold Eisenstein belonged, together with Dirichlet, Jacobi and Kummer, to the generation after Gauss that shaped the theory of numbers in the mid- 19th century, and like Galois, Abel, Riemann, Roch and Clebsch, Eisenstein died young. Today, Eisenstein’s name can be found in the Eisenstein series, Eisenstein sums, the Eisenstein ideal, Eisenstein’s reciprocity law and in his irreducibility criterion, and he is perhaps best known for his ingenious proofs of the quadratic, cubic and biquadratic reciprocity laws. Eisenstein’s father Jo- hann Konstantin Eisenstein emigrated to England in 1840; Eisenstein and his mother followed in June 1842, although Eisenstein’s few remarks on this episode in his autobiography [3] belie the dramatic events that he experienced in Eng- land. On their journey to England, the Eisensteins passed through Hamburg; during the Great Fire in May 1842 about a third of the houses in the Altstadt had burned down. What we learn from Eisenstein’s account is that he was impressed by the sight of railroad lines running right under the foundations of houses (in London?) and by the Menai suspension bridge in Wales: Eisenstein mentions that he undertook six sea voyages, and that on one of them they sailed arXiv:2101.03344v1 [math.HO] 9 Jan 2021 under the tremendous suspension bridge in Anglesey, which was so high that the Berlin Palace would easily have fitted under its main arch.
  • Some Graphical Solutions of the Kepler Problem

    Some Graphical Solutions of the Kepler Problem

    Some Graphical Solutions of the Kepler Problem Marc Frantz 1. INTRODUCTION. When a particle P moves in an inverse square acceleration field, its orbit is a conic section. If the acceleration is repulsive?that is, of the form /x||FP ||~3Fr for a positive constant ?jland a fixed point F?then the orbit is a branch of a hyperbola with F at the focus on the convex side of the branch. If the acceleration is attractive (?/x||TP\\~3FP), then the orbit is a circle with F at the center, an ellipse or parabola with F at a focus, or a branch of a hyperbola with F at the focus on the concave side of the branch. We refer to such orbits as Keplerian orbits after Johannes Kepler, who proposed them as models of planetary motion. It takes rather special conditions to set up circular or parabolic orbits, so it is proba bly safe to say that inNature most closed orbits are ellipses, and most nonclosed orbits are hyperbolas. Ironically, these are precisely the cases in which it is impossible to formulate the position of P as an elementary function of time t?the very thing we most want to know! Nevertheless, for any given time t it is possible to locate P using graphs of elemen tary functions, thereby achieving a partial victory. This endeavor has an interesting history in the case of elliptical orbits, where locating P is called the "Kepler problem." It involves a famous equation known as "Kepler's equation," which we discuss later. In his book Solving Kepler's Equation over Three Centuries Peter Colwell says [5, p.
  • (Preprint) AAS 16-112 ENCKE-BETA PREDICTOR for ORION BURN

    (Preprint) AAS 16-112 ENCKE-BETA PREDICTOR for ORION BURN

    (Preprint) AAS 16-112 ENCKE-BETA PREDICTOR FOR ORION BURN TARGETING AND GUIDANCE Shane Robinson,∗ Sara Scarritt,∗ and John L. Goodmany The state vector prediction algorithm selected for Orion on-board targeting and guidance is known as the Encke-Beta method. Encke-Beta uses a universal anomaly (beta) as the independent variable, valid for circular, elliptical, parabolic, and hy- perbolic orbits. The variable, related to the change in eccentric anomaly, results in integration steps that cover smaller arcs of the trajectory at or near perigee, when velocity is higher. Some burns in the EM-1 and EM-2 mission plans are much longer than burns executed with the Apollo and Space Shuttle vehicles. Burn length, as well as hyperbolic trajectories, has driven the use of the Encke-Beta nu- merical predictor by the predictor/corrector guidance algorithm in place of legacy analytic thrust and gravity integrals. INTRODUCTION On-board software tasks for on-orbit burn targeting, guidance, and navigation require the use of trajectory integrators to predict state vectors forward or backward in time. Burn targeting meth- ods and active guidance routines make extensive use of trajectory prediction algorithms. These predictions may be over time intervals ranging from tens of seconds to hours or even days. Such predictions require higher fidelity numerical integration schemes and higher order acceleration mod- els than very short time interval propagations cyclically executed at high rates, such as those found in the propagation phase of an on-board Kalman filter. A high fidelity state vector predictor may also be used to predict a state vector uplinked by Mission Control forward or backward in time to the current on-board time, so that the high rate short time interval propagator can be reinitialized.
  • 02. Solar System (2001) 9/4/01 12:28 PM Page 2

    02. Solar System (2001) 9/4/01 12:28 PM Page 2

    01. Solar System Cover 9/4/01 12:18 PM Page 1 National Aeronautics and Educational Product Space Administration Educators Grades K–12 LS-2001-08-002-HQ Solar System Lithograph Set for Space Science This set contains the following lithographs: • Our Solar System • Moon • Saturn • Our Star—The Sun • Mars • Uranus • Mercury • Asteroids • Neptune • Venus • Jupiter • Pluto and Charon • Earth • Moons of Jupiter • Comets 01. Solar System Cover 9/4/01 12:18 PM Page 2 NASA’s Central Operation of Resources for Educators Regional Educator Resource Centers offer more educators access (CORE) was established for the national and international distribution of to NASA educational materials. NASA has formed partnerships with universities, NASA-produced educational materials in audiovisual format. Educators can museums, and other educational institutions to serve as regional ERCs in many obtain a catalog and an order form by one of the following methods: States. A complete list of regional ERCs is available through CORE, or electroni- cally via NASA Spacelink at http://spacelink.nasa.gov/ercn NASA CORE Lorain County Joint Vocational School NASA’s Education Home Page serves as a cyber-gateway to informa- 15181 Route 58 South tion regarding educational programs and services offered by NASA for the Oberlin, OH 44074-9799 American education community. This high-level directory of information provides Toll-free Ordering Line: 1-866-776-CORE specific details and points of contact for all of NASA’s educational efforts, Field Toll-free FAX Line: 1-866-775-1460 Center offices, and points of presence within each State. Visit this resource at the E-mail: [email protected] following address: http://education.nasa.gov Home Page: http://core.nasa.gov NASA Spacelink is one of NASA’s electronic resources specifically devel- Educator Resource Center Network (ERCN) oped for the educational community.
  • Encke's Minima and Encke's Division in Saturn's A-Ring

    Encke's Minima and Encke's Division in Saturn's A-Ring

    ENCKE’S MINIMA AND ENCKE’S DIVISION IN SATURN’S A-RING Pedro Ré http://astrosurf.com/re When viewed with the aid of a good quality telescope Saturn is undoubtedly one of the most spectacular objects in the sky. Many amateur astronomers (including the author) say that their first observation of Saturn turned them on to astronomy. Saturn’s rings are easily visible with a good 60 mm refractor at 50x. The 3D appearance of this planet is what makes it so interesting. Details in the rings can be seen during moments of good seeing. The Cassini division (between ring A and B) is easily visible with moderate apertures. The Encke minima and Encke division are more difficult to observe and require large apertures and telescopes of excellent optical quality. These two features can be observed in Saturn’s A-Ring. The Encke minima consists of a broad, low contrast feature located about halfway out in the middle of the A-Ring. The Encke division is a narrow, high contrast feature located near the outer edge of the A-Ring. Unlike the Encke minima, the Encke division is an actual division of the ring (Figure 1). Figure 1- Saturn near Opposition on June 11, 2017. D. Peach, E. Kraaikamp, F. Colas, M. Delcroix, R. Hueso, G. Thérin, C. Sprianu, S2P, IMCCE, OMP. The Encke division is visible around the entire outer A ring. Astronomy Picture of the Day (20170617) https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170617.html 1 Galileo Galilei observed the disk Saturn for the first time using one of his largest refractor.