Thelymitra Benthamiana (Blotched Sun-Orchid)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thelymitra Benthamiana (Blotched Sun-Orchid) Listing Statement for Thelymitra benthamiana (blotched sun-orchid) Thelymitra benthamiana blotched sun-orchid T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S L I S T I N G S T A T E M E N T Image by Hans and Annie Wapstra Scientific name: Thelymitra benthamiana Rchb.f., Beitr. Syst. Pflanzenk. 55 (1871) Common name: blotched sun-orchid (Wapstra et al. 2005) Group: vascular plant, monocotyledon, family Orchidaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 : endangered Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 : Not listed Distribution: Endemic status: Not endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM Region: North Figure 1. The distribution of Thelymitra benthamiana Plate 1. Thelymitra benthamiana inflorescence within Tasmania (image by Hans and Annie Wapstra) 1 Threatened Species Section - Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Thelymitra benthamiana (blotched sun-orchid) IDENTIFICATION AND ECOLOGY green, leathery and obliquely upright. It has the Species of Thelymitra are commonly called sun- most distinctive leaf of any Thelymitra species in orchids because the flowers of most species Tasmania. The flower stems are 20 to 40 cm open only in warm to hot weather, particularly tall and are green with several small bracts. The on bright, sunny days. Thelymitra species are inflorescence comprises 2 to 10 flowers, which terrestrial orchids that die back after flowering are 30 to 40 mm across, greenish yellow with to fleshy subterranean tubers. They are all numerous reddish brown to dark brown spring or summer flowering. Most species have blotches and suffusions and externally dull a single narrow basal leaf although that of greenish brown. The flowers open freely in Thelymitra benthamiana is unique among warm weather and are long lasting. The sepals Tasmanian species in being ovate and leathery and petals are 15 to 20 mm long and 6 to 10 making the species identifiable to species level mm wide, the labellum being the narrowest of even in the vegetative state. Unlike most the flower segments. The column is yellow, orchids, the labellum (lip) of the Thelymitra spotted or blotched, very broadly winged, with flower is generally similar in shape and size to the wings spreading like a mantle and also the petals. Features of the column in the centre yellow, spotted and deeply fringed. The post- of the flower are important in the identification anther lobe is narrow, thick and bulbous. of most species. In all species the column has two arm-like projections that flank the anther [description from Jones 2006] (pollen holding structure). Confusing species Flowers of Thelymitra , which often open widely Thelymitra benthamiana is unlikely to be confused in warm weather, are thought to mimic native with any other Tasmanian species because of its irises and lilies, thus attracting a similar suite of large, bright green, leathery leaf and highly pollinating insects, such as small native bees, distinctive blotched yellow-brown flowers (it is that attempt to collect pollen and often bring one of only three yellow-flowered species and about pollination (Jones et al. 1999). Thelymitra easily distinguished from the other species due benthamiana has long-lasting flowers that open to its blotchy brown flowers). freely and can be both insect-pollinated and self-pollinating (Jones 2006). The flowering of many sun-orchids is enhanced by disturbance, DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT and as a result some species may be prominent Thelymitra benthamiana occurs in southern in disturbed sites such as slashed areas, or along Victoria, South Australia, Western Australia and track verges and road embankments. Thelymitra in northeastern Tasmania. Within Tasmania it is mucida is one such species, responding only known from three locations on Flinders positively to summer fires and the species can Island (Table 1, Figure 1), separated by about 4 be found in disturbed areas. km and occupying less than 2 hectares. The flowering period of Thelymitra benthamiana On the mainland, Thelymitra benthamiana is on mainland Australia is September to widespread and common, growing in open December (Jones 2006). In Tasmania, flowering forest, heathy forest and heathland in well- commences in late October so late October to drained sandy soil and clay loam (Jones 2006). late December is the likely flowering period in In Western Australia, the species is often found this State and the recommended timing for in association with winter-wet soil and on surveys (Wapstra et al. 2008). Note that margins of granite outcrops (Jones 2006). On identification prior to this period is possible Flinders Island, Thelymitra benthamiana occurs on from leaves due to their distinctiveness. slopes and hill tops associated with areas of heathy eucalypt woodland, open Description heathy/scrubby vegetation, bare ground and exposed rock that is sedimentary in origin and Thelymitra benthamiana has a leaf that is ovate, 5 unique to this part of Flinders Island. to 15 cm long and 2 to 3.5 cm wide, bright 2 Threatened Species Section - Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Thelymitra benthamiana (blotched sun-orchid) Table 1. Population summary for Thelymitra benthamiana within Tasmania Subpopulation Tenure NRM 1:25000 Year last Area Number Region * Mapsheet seen occupied of mature (ha) plants 1 Centre Hill, Flinders Island Private North Memana 2005 0.5-1 c. 130 property 2 Melrose Road, Flinders Island Private North Memana 2001 0.1? < 20 property 3 north of Mulligans Hill, Private North Memana 2005 0.005 c. 10-20 Flinders Island property *NRM region = Natural Resource Management region POPULATION ESTIMATE THREATS, LIMITING FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES Thelymitra benthamiana is represented by three subpopulations, totalling fewer than 200 Stochastic risk: Low numbers and the highly individuals. The first subpopulation discovered localised distribution of Thelymitra benthamiana on Centre Hill in 1999 supported about 130 on unreserved private land makes the species individuals (spread over 130 by 60 m). The susceptible to chance events. This is second subpopulation discovered in 2000 about exacerbated by the relationship with 3 km to the west of Centre Hill supported mychorrizal fungi which may make the species fewer than 20 plants (precise extent not susceptible to additional factors The precise documented but indicated as being a small area extent of each of the subpopulations is also not only). These two subpopulations are separated formally documented so disturbance from by unsuitable habitat (i.e. pasture). The third nearby activities has the potential to impact the subpopulation occurs about 1 km further west sites supporting the species. on a ridge north of Mulligans Hill and was also Land clearing: Any clearing activities discovered in 2000. It seems unlikely that conducted near Thelymitra benthamiana are likely significant range extensions will be made to deleteriously affect the species through because the habitat (especially the geology) with changes to vegetation and soil structure, and which Thelymitra benthamiana is associated is associated impacts of altered grazing/browsing relatively restricted and much of Flinders Island regimes. Any clearing of vegetation on similar has been well surveyed for orchids by local geology on Flinders Island may result in the specialists and the species is distinctive. Even if further loss of potential habitat for the species. new subpopulations are discovered, the Inappropriate grazing and disturbance conservation status of the species would likely regime: The known subpopulations are subject remain unchanged. to grazing and stock trampling and there are signs of erosion caused by stock trampling, RESERVATION STATUS which could lead to changes in population Thelymitra benthamiana occurs on unreserved structure. A change from sheep to cattle grazing private property. is likely to increase impacts to the habitat e.g. from the introduction of weeds. Changes to CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT fertilising practices are also a threat (e.g. even a one-off fertiliser application is likely to Thelymitra benthamiana was listed in 2005 as eliminate the species). Part of the area endangered on schedules of the Tasmanian supporting Thelymitra benthamiana on Centre Hill Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 , meeting has been disturbed by heavy machinery, and the criterion B because there are fewer than 250 site north of Mulligans Hill occurs on disturbed mature individuals and its range is severely heathland that has been scraped by machinery. restricted (it occupies less than 2 hectares, and Inappropriate fire regime: The flowering of it occurs in only 3 nearby subpopulations). Thelymitra benthamiana is likely to be enhanced 3 Threatened Species Section - Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Thelymitra benthamiana (blotched sun-orchid) by summer fires. For safety reasons, fire • implement a fire management regime management at the known sites and in potential suitable for dry heathy scrub and woodland habitat for Thelymitra benthamiana is usually should the vegetation become too dense for directed towards preventing the type of fires the species, especially in the absence of considered ideal to stimulate flowering. A more stock grazing; frequent lower intensity fuel reduction fire • regime is unlikely to benefit the species and in monitor known sites and nearby similar habitat during the flowering season to the long term may reduce
Recommended publications
  • Orchid Historical Biogeography, Diversification, Antarctica and The
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016) ORIGINAL Orchid historical biogeography, ARTICLE diversification, Antarctica and the paradox of orchid dispersal Thomas J. Givnish1*, Daniel Spalink1, Mercedes Ames1, Stephanie P. Lyon1, Steven J. Hunter1, Alejandro Zuluaga1,2, Alfonso Doucette1, Giovanny Giraldo Caro1, James McDaniel1, Mark A. Clements3, Mary T. K. Arroyo4, Lorena Endara5, Ricardo Kriebel1, Norris H. Williams5 and Kenneth M. Cameron1 1Department of Botany, University of ABSTRACT Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, Aim Orchidaceae is the most species-rich angiosperm family and has one of USA, 2Departamento de Biologıa, the broadest distributions. Until now, the lack of a well-resolved phylogeny has Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia, 3Centre for Australian National Biodiversity prevented analyses of orchid historical biogeography. In this study, we use such Research, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, a phylogeny to estimate the geographical spread of orchids, evaluate the impor- 4Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, tance of different regions in their diversification and assess the role of long-dis- Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, tance dispersal (LDD) in generating orchid diversity. 5 Santiago, Chile, Department of Biology, Location Global. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Methods Analyses use a phylogeny including species representing all five orchid subfamilies and almost all tribes and subtribes, calibrated against 17 angiosperm fossils. We estimated historical biogeography and assessed the
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society of South Australia Journal November 2016
    Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. Journal Diuris calcicola One of new orchid species named in 2015 Photo: R. Bates November 2016 Volume 40 No. 10 Native Orchid Society of South Australia Journal November 2016 NOSSA WEBSITE https://nossa.org.au/ The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through preservation of natural habitat and cultivation. Except with the documented official representation of the management President committee, no person may represent the Society on any matter. All native Vacant orchids are protected in the wild; their collection without written Government Vice President permit is illegal. Robert Lawrence Email: [email protected] Contents Secretary Title Author Page Rosalie Lawrence Bulletin Board 111 Email: [email protected] Vice President’s Report Robert Lawrence 112 Treasurer Thanks to volunteers at APS show Les Nesbitt 112 Christine Robertson October Meeting Review Robin Soergel 113 Email: [email protected] NOSSA Tuber Bank Jane Higgs 113 Editor Lorraine Badger Rockleigh Orchid Survey Peter Watts 114 Assistant Editor - Rob Soergel NOSSA Clare Field Trip Rosalie Lawrence 115 Email: [email protected] NOSSA Scott Creek CP Field Trip Rosalie Lawrence 116 Committee Seed Bank Report Les Nesbitt 117 Michael Clark Letters to the editor - erratum Lorraine Badger 117 Bob Bates Oct Orchid Picture Competition Rosalie Lawrence 118 Kris Kopicki Oct Benched Orchid/Sarcho Results Les Nesbitt 119 Photos David Hirst& others 120 Other Positions Membership Liaison Officer Robert Lawrence Life Members Ph: 8294 8014 Mr R Hargreaves† Mr G Carne Mrs T Bridle Email:[email protected] Mr H Goldsack† Mr R Bates Botanical Advisor Mr R Robjohns† Mr R Shooter Bob Bates Mr J Simmons† Mr W Dear Conservation Officer Mr D Wells† Mrs C Houston Thelma Bridle Ph: 8557 6553.
    [Show full text]
  • Five New Species of Corybas (Diurideae, Orchidaceae) Endemic to New Zealand and Phylogeny of the Nematoceras Clade
    Phytotaxa 270 (1): 001–024 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.270.1.1 Five new species of Corybas (Diurideae, Orchidaceae) endemic to New Zealand and phylogeny of the Nematoceras clade CARLOS A. LEHNEBACH1, ANDREAS J. ZELLER1, JONATHAN FRERICKS2 & PETER RITCHIE2 1Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO BOX 467, Wellington. New Zealand; email: [email protected] 2Victoria University of Wellington, PO BOX 600, Wellington, New Zealand Abstract Five new species of Corybas endemic to New Zealand, C. confusus, C. obscurus, C. sanctigeorgianus, C. vitreus, and C. wallii are described. These species are segregated from the Corybas trilobus aggregate based on morphometric and DNA fingerprinting (AFLP) analyses. A key to the new species is also provided, and their distribution and conservation status are included. Phylogenetic results showed that, despite the great morphological and ecological diversity of these orchids, genetic divergence between species is low, suggesting recent diversification. We also found evidence for multiple dispersal events from New Zealand to several offshore and sub-Antarctic islands. Key words: Brood-site deception, dispersal, islands, Mycetophila, speciation, sub-Antarctic, threatened flora Introduction Islands provide exceptional settings to investigate the evolution of biological diversity. Because of their discrete boundaries and isolated nature, the presence of a species can only be explained by dispersal from mainland sources or in situ speciation (Valente et al. 2014). Speciation may occur rapidly on these remote habitats, giving rise to species- rich lineages that may exhibit exceptional morphological and ecological diversification (Losos & Ricklefs 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • NZ Orchid Key: a New Smartphone App for Identifying Native Orchids Murray Dawson1, Jeremy Rolfe, Michael Pratt and Ian St George
    NZ Orchid Key: a new smartphone app for identifying native orchids Murray Dawson1, Jeremy Rolfe, Michael Pratt and Ian St George Smartphones have rapidly become the device of choice for New Zealanders and the rest of the world. Their processing power, storage capacity, and portability have come of age, making it possible to run comprehensive productivity apps including identification tools. Uptake of this technology will continue to increase into the foreseeable future. It is timely then that a powerful app for identifying native orchids is now available for smartphones and tablets from the Android Google Play Store and Apple’s iTunes (Fig. 1A–E)2. E Fig. 1 Screenshots of the NZ Orchid Key C app. A, icon, illustrating the mauve sun orchid (Thelymitra malvina). B, start-up screen. C, feature (character) list. D, entity (species) list. E, part of a built-in species profile. This free app, called the NZ Orchid Key, is easy-to-use, has lots of A colourful photographs, and covers a wide array of plant characters3, including leaves, flowers, habitats, and distribution for identifying native orchids. Users choose whichever characters in the app match the orchid specimen they are identifying through a process of elimination. If a user needs help to understand what a particular character state means, they can bring up an explanation page for it. Each species within the app is supported by a descriptive profile, providing all the information needed to verify the identification. Species D profiles include links out to online B resources on native orchids – the 1 Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, Canterbury, New Zealand; [email protected] 2 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lucidcentral.mobile.nz_orchid and https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/nz-orchid-key/ id1063192594?mt=8 3 In total, 43 characters and 212 character states were chosen for identifying native orchids in the key.
    [Show full text]
  • Thelymitra Species (Orchidaceae) and Their Hybrids in Western Australia
    Volume 15: 165–183 ELOPEA Publication date: 8 November 2013 T dx.doi.org/10.7751/telopea2013020 Journal of Plant Systematics plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea • escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL • ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) • ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) Floral biology of large-flowered Thelymitra species (Orchidaceae) and their hybrids in Western Australia Retha Edens-Meier1, Eric Westhus2 and Peter Bernhardt2 1Department of Educational Studies, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA 63103 2Dept. of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA 63013 Abstract Historically, only a few large flowered species in the genus Thelymitra were identified as obligate out-breeders. We compared floral presentation, pollen-pistil interactions, pollination ecology, and interspecific hybridization in two populations of T. macrophylla where its flowering periods overlapped with T. antennifera (Tenterden) and T. crinita (Lesmurdie) respectively. Pollen-pistil interactions were studied using glasshouse collections of T. crinita and T. macrophylla at KPBG. The number of flowers per inflorescence in T. macrophylla varied significantly between sites. Climatic conditions influenced flower opening and closing regimes differently in T. crinita vs. T. macrophylla. While all three Thelymitra species opened on warm, sunny mornings and closed by late afternoon, T. crinita at Lesmurdie was significantly more likely to open its perianth segments on cool days compared to the co-blooming, sympatric flowers of T. macrophylla. The floral lifespans of individual flowers of T. macrophylla and T. crinita were reduced significantly following application of Thelymitra pollen onto the stigmatic surface but were not reduced by pollinarium removal. Flowers of both species were self-compatible but neither species self-pollinated mechanically (autogamy).
    [Show full text]
  • South East Flora
    Regional Species Conservation Assessments DENR South East Region Complete Dataset for all Flora Assessments Dec 2011 In Alphabetical Order of Species Name MAP ID FAMILY NAME PLANT FORM NSX CODE SPECIES NAME COMMON NAME SOUTH EAST Regional EAST SOUTH Status Regional EAST SOUTH Status Score Regional Trend EAST SOUTH Score Regional EAST SOUTH Status+Trend Score SOUTH EAST Regional Trend EAST SOUTH FAMILY FAMILY NUMBER (CENSUS OF SA) EPBCACTSTATUSCODE NPWACTSTATUSCODE LASTOBSERVED_in_SE TOTAL_in_SA TOTAL_in_SE %_SOUTH_EAST_REGION EofO_in_SE_All_km2 EofO_in_SE_Recent_km2 AofO_in_SE_All_km2 AofO_in_SE_Recent_km2 711 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes Y01536 Acacia acinacea Wreath Wattle 2009 814 60 7.37 3000 1700 48 27 LC 1 0 0.3 1.3 712 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K01545 Acacia brachybotrya Grey Mulga-bush 2001 563 18 3.20 800 500 16 9 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 713 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes M01554 Acacia continua Thorn Wattle 1974 836 1 0.12 100 1 VU 4 DD 0.0 4.0 714 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes C05237 Acacia cupularis Cup Wattle 2002 577 83 14.38 4700 1500 65 20 LC 1 0 0.3 1.3 716 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K01561 Acacia dodonaeifolia Hop-bush Wattle R 2002 237 33 13.92 800 400 19 6 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 718 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes M01562 Acacia enterocarpa Jumping-jack Wattle EN E 2008 92 16 17.39 700 400 10 7 VU 4 0 0.3 4.3 719 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes C05985 Acacia euthycarpa Wallowa 1992 681 7 1.03 500 100 7 1 RA 3 - 0.4 3.4 720 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes S01565 Acacia farinosa Mealy Wattle 1997 325 88 27.08 4000 1600 65 23 NT 2 0 0.3 2.3 721 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE
    [Show full text]
  • Belair National Park
    Preliminary Flora List Interim Flora Species List BELAIR NATIONAL PARK (NPWS) Reserve code : NP13 Accepted Species Common name First - Last Record Acacia acinacea Wreath Wattle 01/01/1978 - 22/09/2002 Acacia longifolia var. longifolia * Sallow Wattle 01/01/1978 - 21/05/1986 Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood 01/01/1978 - 21/05/1986 Acacia myrtifolia var. myrtifolia Myrtle Wattle 01/01/1978 - 14/12/1999 Acacia paradoxa Kangaroo Thorn 01/01/1936 - 22/09/2002 Acacia pycnantha Golden Wattle 01/01/1978 - 22/09/2002 Acacia retinodes var. retinodes (hill form) Wirilda 01/01/1936 - 01/01/1936 Acacia spinescens Spiny Wattle 01/01/1936 - 01/01/1936 Acacia verticillata Prickly Moses 01/01/1936 - 01/01/1936 Acaena echinata var. Sheep's Burr 01/01/1936 - 01/01/1936 Acaena novae-zelandiae Biddy-biddy 01/01/1936 - 21/05/1986 Acetosella vulgaris * Sorrel 01/01/1987 - 01/01/1987 Acianthus pusillus Mosquito Orchid 01/01/1936 - 10/07/2000 Acrotriche fasciculiflora Mount Lofty Ground-berry 01/01/1978 - 30/11/2000 Acrotriche serrulata Cushion Ground-berry 01/01/1978 - 30/11/2000 Actinobole uliginosum Flannel Cudweed 01/01/1936 - 01/01/1936 Adiantum aethiopicum Common Maiden-hair 21/05/1986 - 21/05/1986 Agrostis aemula Blown-grass 01/01/1936 - 29/11/2000 Agrostis avenacea var. avenacea Common Blown-grass 21/05/1986 - 21/05/1986 Agrostis capillaris var. capillaris * Brown-top Bent 01/01/1987 - 01/01/1987 Aira cupaniana * Small Hair-grass 01/01/1987 - 01/01/1987 Aira elegantissima ssp. elegantissima * Delicate Hair-grass 29/11/2000 - 29/11/2000 Ajuga australis form B Lesser Bugle 01/01/1936 - 23/09/2000 Allium triquetrum * Three-cornered Garlic 01/01/1987 - 01/01/1987 Allocasuarina muelleriana ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Thelymitra Dedmaniarum)
    INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO. 331 CINNAMON SUN ORCHID (Thelymitra dedmaniarum) INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN 2013–2017 January 2013 Department of Environment and Conservation Kensington Interim Recovery Plan for Thelymitra dedmaniarum FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) Policy Statements Nos. 44 and 50. Note: the Department of CALM formally became the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) in July 2006. DEC will continue to adhere to these Policy Statements until they are revised and reissued. These plans outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. DEC is committed to ensuring that Threatened taxa are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans (RPs) or IRPs, and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and, in the case of Critically Endangered taxa, always within one year of endorsement of that rank by the Minister. This plan, which results from a review of, and replaces IRP No. 45 Cinnamon Sun Orchid (Thelymitra manginii ms) 1999- 2002, will operate from January 2013 to December 2017 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the taxon is still ranked as Critically Endangered in WA, this plan will be reviewed after five years and the need for further recovery actions assessed. This plan was given regional approval on 10th October 2012 and was approved by the Director of Nature Conservation on 30th January 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • 080058-92.02.002.Pdf
    'Jeqruq ',{ueq1y 'pusD{u"rd ,Isad sed,{1i(1runuruoc Jeqlo ss sB JoJ pqse^]sq pua {rsrruaq II I I[€^\ 'eprsaeo eq o1 ,(1e41 s4serc! (roloctsp^tp mdQocng) IuJa4 4ru"Jg ol JeuB€raql lsEe-qlnos-ls"e sJapuDerl 11e 'eepJ?I ',{ellBeq^{ sapnlcu! 1 esnecaq uorleSgsa,rur aaJs puB ol qlnos ol lsue'dnuuBN ot Jo Fl.qdBJSoeB erll sB ueJJ8^\ eql esoqc e/l\ lsorrrl€ r{uou anp spuoq l! eJaq,r Je^ry ,([auuoq aqt ol lculstpqns lBcruslog ut"ld Je^rU gocs egl do1 eq1 sso:cr '1sare1m Jo NRo-r{lnos-ls"e luraueSelour Jo eq oslr ueql 'ralry poo.r$lt?tg eq1 uo e8pug repusxelv ol ,{ru 1sq 1ua1dprru qJJBeseJcrlsuou Jo ,l\erleJ aqJ lsua-qlnos-g$os sun-r ifurprmoq prrvJu Jo rueqUou aql 'sn[L '(SS 'd 'uousrrrJoJr[ dn8uJlpl urorJ :OgOt preag) lueuoduoc cglualJs elqs[r8^? lseq luucgruErs € eq ol sesrea JoloJtslaqp e:eql\ eq1 q1m,(4snpw drqcpoo,{ aq1 eEeuuu pnB rolmour ? 'lueue8su"l u.{erp sr,{:epunoq ruaquou eql elq,t\ 'lse/rt pu qlnos IrlSru 11 leqf os I purl pu? uorts^lesuoC 'lseoc sgl ol "es aq1 .{q paprmoq sr lI qmos eqt uo Jo lueulredaq eqt ,{q pelJnpuoJ Bllerlsny {*qlv ot e8pJg alsqumlulq-urrnoe-I eqt uo dn?u1ge1 lsea-rllnos u1 luerua8yuvu lseJoJ Jo lcedur eq1 uo qcJBoser uo.5 u{ 0o€ re^o spuelxe lcFlslpgns uerr"d\ eql Jo ?rterler B ol uorpquluoa v sa ,{luzuud esoP s3^\ IroA\ eqJ qcJReseJamlry ro3 sequoud 'errqsadsred 'EcefoJd luuor8a.r e ur seulluepr puE rIcJBeseJ tuaJrnc ol sJeJeJ ur"{ ol pernJuoo queuodwoc esoql go 'BroU '(9961 lseloJ lueuecqd r"lncsBl u,llou{ eql 3o 1s1 e quaserd 11 s8q lculslPgns uerrB eloq^1 eql JoJ P€lqBua \ p-rceg rnras) lclrtspgns lBcruslog
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for Twenty-One Threatened Orchids in South-Eastern Australia
    DRAFT for public comment National Recovery Plan for Twenty-one Threatened Orchids in South-eastern Australia Mike Duncan and Fiona Coates Prepared by Mike Duncan and Fiona Coates, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Heidelberg, Victoria Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, March 2010. © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2010 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 978-1-74242-224-4 (online) This is a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. An electronic version of this document is available on the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts website www.environment.gov.au For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 Citation: Duncan, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Orchid Diversification in Time and Space: Molecular Phylogenetic Insights from the Beard Orchids (Calochilus, Diurideae)
    Australian Systematic Botany, 2018, 31, 389–408 ©CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB18027 Supplementary material Australasian orchid diversification in time and space: molecular phylogenetic insights from the beard orchids (Calochilus, Diurideae) Katharina NargarA,B,E, Sarah MolinaA,B, Natascha WagnerC, Lars NauheimerA, Claire MicheneauA, and Mark A. ClementsD,E AAustralian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, GPO Box 6811, Cairns, Qld 4878, Australia. BNational Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CDepartment of Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants, Albrecht Haller Institute for Plant Sciences, Georg August University of Goettingen, Untere Klarspüle 2, D-37073 Goettingen, Germany. DCentre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. EAustralian National Botanic Gardens, GPO Box 1777, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. FCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Australian Systematic Botany ©CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB18027 Table S1. Plant material used in the study and GenBank accession numbers Herbarium abbreviations according to Index Herbariorum. Superscript numbers denote GenBank numbers for sequences generated in other studies. 1, Clements et al. (2002); 2, Nauheimer et al. (2018); 3, Clements et al., unpubl. data; 4, A. Perkins and P. Weston, unpubl. data Species Voucher details DNA number GenBank accession numbers accD atpA atpB atpE atpF-p1 atpF-p2 atpH atpI ccsA Calochilus caesius PERTH: Barrett, R.L. CNS_G05068 MH815014 MH661261 MH815015 MH815016 MH815017 MH815018 MH815019 MH815020 MH815021 D.L.Jones 6273 Calochilus campestris CANB: Jones, D.L. CNS_G06021 – MH661267 MH661276 MH685837 MH661290 MH661305 MH661320 MH661335 MH661350 R.Br. 8586 Calochilus cupreus R.S. CANB: Murfet, D.E.
    [Show full text]