DOCSLIB.ORG

Lowes Creek & Maryland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lowes Creek & Maryland Our reference: DOC13/336 The Proper Officer Haines Bros Earthmoving & Drainage PO Box 123 BRINGELLY NSW 2556 Attention: Steve Nest orovic BY EMAIL AND STANDARD POST 8 January 2013 Dear Mr Nestorovic ‘Maryland’ 877 The Northern Road, Bringelly – Ground Technologies Report GTE206 Compliance with Clean-Up Notice No 1504687 Reference is made to Clean-Up Notice No. 1504687 (the Notice) and Variation Notice No. 1506331 which were issued by the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) to Haines Bros Earthmoving & Drainage (Haines Bros) in relation to waste transported to ‘Maryland’ 877 The Northern Road, Bringelly (the Premises). Reference is also made to Ground Technologies Report GTE206-ENV01Rev1 (the Report) provided by Haines Bros to the EPA on 19 December 2012. The EPA has reviewed the Report and has determined that based on the information provided, Haines Bros have complied with Direction 1 of the Notice. The EPA has also reviewed the disposal documentation for the waste removed from the Premises, and notes that the documentation complies with the requirements of Direction 2 of the Notice. If you have any questions in relation to this matter, please contact Megan Whelan on (02) 4224 4109. Yours sincerely CATE WOODS Unit Head – Waste Operations Environment Protection Authority PO Box 513 Wollongong NSW 2520 Block D, Level 3, 84 Crown Street Wollongong NSW 2500 Tel: (02) 4224 4100 Fax: (02) 4224 4110 ABN 43 692 285 758 www.environment.nsw.gov.au Draft 1 Historical Archaeological Assessment Maryland, Bringelly Detail of ‘Reduced plan of the Cowpasture Estates, formerly J. Dickson's’, subdivisions prior to auction 28 July 1840. Surveyor: E. J. H. Knapp. Study area outlined in blue. SLNSW Z/M2 811.113/1840/1A. Report to Tropman & Tropman Architects on behalf Macarthur Developments May 2016 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report examines the potential for the Maryland estate to retain historical archaeological remains which may be subject to future impact depending on the nature of proposed impacts. This site is under consideration for listing on the State Heritage Register (SHR). RESULTS Maryland contains a number of standing buildings constructed during the 19th century, including the main homestead, workers’ accommodation, winery buildings, stables and farm buildings. All these buildings are regarded as likely to retain archaeological remains associated with their use. There also can be a range of archaeological features which occur in the vicinity of standing buildings, such as former buildings or additions and ad hoc rubbish pits. There are also several potential archaeological sites not currently associated with the standing buildings. The potential for the site to contain historical archaeological remains associated with the early land grants on the site (Phase 3), dating prior to the 1850s, is low to nil. These remains would have been ephemeral to begin with, consisting of dropped items and possibly fences. The study area was not cultivated for grain in Phase 3, apart from perhaps the area of Dowdell’s grant. Later farm activities such as tilling the soil for improvement (seen on some aerial photos) will have adversely impacted on the potential for such evidence to be preserved. Any occupation-related artefact assemblages would complement what is known from urban domestic sites from the same period. Some assemblages also have possibility of providing information regarding the day-to-day life of the occupants of the house. Structural remains would enhance our knowledge regarding development of the architectural history of the buildings. The potential archaeological resource is considered to compliment the standing buildings, and activities associated with their uses. It is therefore of State significance. The excavation of features related to the occupation of Maryland is likely to enhance the overall archaeological data set of New South Wales RECOMMENDATIONS As the study area has the potential to retain State significant archaeological remains, the following recommendations are made: . Any proposed impacts within the Maryland curtilage site should consider how to minimise impacts on the potential archaeological resource. Any impacts on archaeological sites listed in this report should be subject of a S140 Archaeological Excavation application to the Heritage Division, Office of Environment and Heritage. The S140 documentation will need to consider mitigation of impacts on potential archaeological resources as well as putting forward methodologies to record and archaeological remains exposed during works. Methodologies might include clarification of strategies to minimisation of impacts, testing prior to the finalisation of impact design, which may lead to detailed archaeological recording and investigation. This report should be lodged as part of any S140 application. Standard conditions attached to S140 approvals include the requirement for a final report on the results of any archaeological program and the cataloguing and archiving of any archaeological artefacts or relics recovered during the works. Casey & Lowe Maryland, Bringelly Historical Archaeological Assessment ii Casey & Lowe Maryland, Bringelly Historical Archaeological Assessment iii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... i RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................................. i Contents ................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Statutory Constraints ............................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Previous Reports ................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Authorship ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.6 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 9 1.7 Limitations ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.8 Glossary ................................................................................................................................. 9 1.9 Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.0 Historical Background .................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Early land use ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 First land grants 1810s to 1850s ......................................................................................... 12 2.3 ‘Maryland’ ........................................................................................................................... 20 3.0 Archaeological Potential ................................................................................................ 31 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Site description .................................................................................................................... 32 3.3 Analysis of historic site development ................................................................................. 64 3.4 Summary Phases ................................................................................................................. 74 3.5 Comparative sites ................................................................................................................ 74 3.6 Discussion of archaeological potential ................................................................................ 75 4.0 Heritage Significance ..................................................................................................... 83 4.1 Heritage significance ........................................................................................................... 83 4.2 Heritage significance and archaeology................................................................................ 83 4.3 Previous statements of built heritage significance ............................................................. 84 4.4 Discussion of Heritage Significance ..................................................................................... 86 4.5 Statement of Heritage Significance ..................................................................................... 92 5.0 Results and Recommendations .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Paper Houses'
    ‘Paper houses’ John Macarthur and the 30-year design process of Camden Park Volume 2: appendices Scott Ethan Hill A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Faculty of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney Sydney, Australia 10th August, 2016 (c) Scott Hill. All rights reserved Appendices 1 Bibliography 2 2 Catalogue of architectural drawings in the Mitchell Library 20 (Macarthur Papers) and the Camden Park archive Notes as to the contents of the papers, their dating, and a revised catalogue created for this dissertation. 3 A Macarthur design and building chronology: 1790 – 1835 146 4 A House in Turmoil: Just who slept where at Elizabeth Farm? 170 A resource document drawn from the primary sources 1826 – 1834 5 ‘Small town boy’: An expanded biographical study of the early 181 life and career of Henry Kitchen prior to his employment by John Macarthur. 6 The last will and testament of Henry Kitchen Snr, 1804 223 7 The last will and testament of Mary Kitchen, 1816 235 8 “Notwithstanding the bad times…”: An expanded biographical 242 study of Henry Cooper’s career after 1827, his departure from the colony and reported death. 9 The ledger of John Verge: 1830-1842: sections related to the 261 Macarthurs transcribed from the ledger held in the Mitchell Library, State Library of NSW, A 3045. 1 1 Bibliography A ACKERMANN, JAMES (1990), The villa: form and ideology of country houses. London, Thames & Hudson. ADAMS, GEORGE (1803), Geometrical and Graphical Essays Containing a General Description of the of the mathematical instruments used in geometry, civil and military surveying, levelling, and perspective; the fourth edition, corrected and enlarged by William Jones, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Menangle
    EARLY MENANGLE As published in the “Voice of the North”, between August 1927 and July 1929 JUNE 12, 2021 PERSONAL USE Camden Area Family History Society (CAFHS) Preface Early Menangle is a collection of newspaper articles written by J.J. Moloney under the pseudonym J.J.M. and published by the Voice of the North newspaper monthly between August 10, 1927 and July 10, 1929. At some point after the publication of the last article, they were collated and printed as a book, a copy of which is held by Picton Family & Historical Society and published online at: http://www.pictonheritage.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/early-menangle.pdf Because of the large number of names, the text was taken from Trove, compiled and indexed. The names were then checked against the Camden Area Family History Society (CAFHS) database and where a distinction was required, dates of birth added. Any errors made during this process are those of the editor. Janet Howe CAFHS, Editor 1 Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................... 1 Voice of the North, Wed 10 August 1927, page 15 ................................................... 3 Voice of the North, Mon 12 September 1927, page 14 ............................................. 5 Voice of the North, Monday 10 October 1927, page 14 ........................................... 8 Voice of the North, Thur 10 November 1927, page 14 ........................................... 10 Voice of the North, Mon 12 December 1927, page 14 ............................................ 13 Voice of the North, Tuesday 10 January 1928, page 14 .......................................... 16 Voice of the North, Friday 10 February 1928, page 14 ........................................... 18 Voice of the North, Monday 12 March 1928, page 14 ............................................ 20 Voice of the North, Tuesday 10 April 1928, page 14 .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Calling
    Camden Calling Volume 22 Number 2 November 2018 ISSN 1329 -4075 $2.00 1 OFFICE BEARERS August 2018 — July 2019 President: Tony Jackson Vice- President: Fred Gibson Secretary: Cathey Shepherd Minute Secretary Jo O’Brien Treasurer: Barbara Sulley Library Coordinator: Janet Howe Editor: Warren Sims Assistant Editor: Anne McIntosh Research Officer: Dawn Williams Assistant Research Officer: Jo O’Brien Public Officer: Rex Dowle Membership: Beverley Booth Social Secretary: To Be Advised Committee Members: Lee Stratton Rosemary Gibson Honorary Accountant Mr. Jim Hunter Address all enquiries to: The Secretary Camden Area Family History Society Inc. P.O. Box 679 Camden. NSW. 2570. Australia. Mob no. 0438012013 email: [email protected] F’book: Camden Area Family History Society Normal Membership Subscriptions: Single A$30.00 Couples A$35.00 Pensioner/Concession Membership Subscription: Single A$25.00 Couples A$30.00 WEBSITE www.cafhs.org.au RESEARCH FEES f’book : Non-members use of Resources-$10.00 per session. Written enquires $30.00 — provides up to fifteen printed or photocopied pages. A4 size stamped addressed envelope to be included with your enquiry. Camden area Family RESEARCHHistory CENTREAFHS Family History Room Camden Library/Museum Complex. John Street. Camden. NSW 2570 Thursday & Friday 10:00am — 3.00pm Saturday 9:30am — 12 noon (Closed late December to late January) ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING The Annual General Meeting of the Camden Area Family History Society Inc. is held on the first Tuesday of August each year, immediately following the general meeting. The Society meets on the first Tuesday of each month (except January) at 7.30pm in the Community Meeting Room of the Camden Library/Museum Complex 40 JOHN STREET CAMDEN.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Submission to the Growth Management
    DRAFT SUBMISSION TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY WOLLONDILLY COUNCIL COMPILED BY MENANGLE ACTION GROUP AND MENANGLE COMMUNITY GROUP JUNE 2010 INDEX Introduction ………………………………………………....1 Executive Summary……………………………………..…2 Our Vision……………………………………………………3 History……………………………………………………..…5 Menangle, Macarthur Country Point History…………..7 Menangle and Camden Park Heritage Citations…….18 Biodiversity, A Government Priority…………………..19 Cumberland Plain…………………………………………20 Nepean River……………………………………………….28 Cultural Landscape……………………………………….32 Development Control Plan No. 41……………………...34 Geology and Soils………………………………………...36 Appendices…………………………………………………40 INTRODUCTION This DRAFT submission was compiled by the member of Menangle Action Group (MAG), Menangle Community Association (MCA) and members of the local community. Our aim is to submit a paper outlining what we know to be key assets of the area between Menangle and Douglas Park bordered by the Nepean River to the East and West of the Hume Highway, also including lands North of Menangle Village. We have a high concentration of environmental, historical and cultural assets and our Vision has been developed to capitalize on these assets. We would like to point out that we are not experts in planning but have relied on previous planning documents, reports by the National Parks and Wildlife Association, Government Departments and local knowledge. We would also like to highlight the fact the Macarthur South Paper of 1991, whilst it can be said to be dated, is actually the most comprehensive study on this area to date, taking into consideration all facets of planning. More recent studies tend to be fairly broad in nature, lacking detail, focusing on only one or two pressing issues of the day. We believe that we are very fortunate as a community to live in such a beautiful and interesting area and are very keen for Wollondilly Council to understand the special lifestyle this landscape affords us.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Municipal Council Area Street Names
    CAMDEN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AREA STREET NAME SOUTH CAMDEN Adelong Place The name Adelong appears to be derived from the Aboriginal language meaning "along the way" or "plain with a river". Antill Close Named after the Antill family of “Jarvisfield” Picton. Henry Colden Antill who was born in 1779 in New York of British stock, his father was John Antill. Henry migrated to Sydney on 1/1/1810. Married Eliza Wills in 1818 and in 1825 settled on his estate near Picton, named Jarvisfield; and, in 1844 he subdivided part of his estate on the north of Stonequarry Creek, as the result he made possible the founding of the town of Picton (originally known as Stonequarry). He died and was buried in the family vault at Jarvisfield, in August 1852, survived by six sons and two daughters. Picture of Henry Colden Antill Araluen Place The name 'Araluen' meant 'water lily' or 'place of the water lilies' in the Aboriginal dialect of the Araluen area of NSW Armour Avenue Named after Robert William Armour born 1848 worked at the”Hermitage” The oaks in 1845. A noted bushman and expert horseman. In the early 1850s he brought land at Cobbitty. Son George was a prominent apiarist and well known keen sportsman, barber and poet. He died on 29 Oct 1933 and is buried at St. Paul’s Cobbitty. Arndell Street Most likely named after Doctor Thomas Arndell (1753- 1821), surgeon, magistrate and landholder, was one of seven assistant surgeons who formed the medical staff led by Surgeon-General John White which cared for the convicts in the First Fleet .
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Invasive African Olive Tree in Australia
    Evolutionary Applications Evolutionary Applications ISSN 1752-4571 ORIGINAL ARTICLE History of the invasive African olive tree in Australia and Hawaii: evidence for sequential bottlenecks and hybridization with the Mediterranean olive Guillaume Besnard,1,† Jer emy Dupuy,1,† Maximilien Larter,2 Peter Cuneo,3 David Cooke4 and Lounes Chikhi1,5 1 Laboratoire Evolution & Diversite Biologique, CNRS, UPS, ENFA, UMR 5174, Toulouse, France 2 INRA, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Universite de Bordeaux, Talence, France 3 The Australian Botanic Garden, Mount Annan, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Mount Annan, NSW, Australia 4 Department of Primary Industries and Resources PIRSA, Biosecurity SA, Adelaide, SA, Australia 5 Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia,^ Oreiras, Portugal Keywords Abstract admixture, approximate Bayesian computation, biologic invasion, cuspidata, Humans have introduced plants and animals into new continents and islands introgression, microsatellites, Olea europaea, with negative effects on local species. This has been the case of the olive that plastid DNA was introduced in Australia, New Zealand and Pacific islands where it became invasive. Two subspecies were introduced in Australia, and each successfully Correspondence invaded a specific area: the African olive in New South Wales (NSW) and Guillaume Besnard, Laboratoire Evolution & the Mediterranean olive in South Australia. Here, we examine their origins Diversite Biologique, CNRS, UPS, ENFA, UMR 5174, 31062 Toulouse 4, France. and spread and analyse a large sample of native and invasive accessions with Tel.: +0(33) 5 61 55 85 45; chloroplast and nuclear microsatellites. African olive populations from the e-mail: [email protected] invaded range exhibit two South African chlorotypes hence supporting an introduction from South Africa, while populations from South Australia exhi- † These authors contributed equally to this bit chlorotypes of Mediterranean cultivars.
    [Show full text]
  • Utopia Or Dystopia: a Contested Space on Sydney's Urban Frontier
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 1-1-2018 Utopia or Dystopia: A Contested Space on Sydney's Urban Frontier Ian Willis University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Willis, Ian, "Utopia or Dystopia: A Contested Space on Sydney's Urban Frontier" (2018). Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers. 3490. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/3490 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Utopia or Dystopia: A Contested Space on Sydney's Urban Frontier Abstract Australia is a settler society where the rural-urban fringe of the major cities and regional centres is a contestable stage. There are a range of actors who compete in place making processes re-shaping the cultural landscape when there is collision over the ownership of space and the dominant narrative. This paper examines the proposition that Sydney's urban growth has created a zone of conflict on the city's metropolitan frontier between cultural heritage and the interests of development. In recent years Sydney's rural-urban fringe has encroached on the village boundaries of Menangle where there has been a collision between the expectation and aspirations of villagers and a local land developer. Village activism has sought to defend a landscape aesthetic created by settler colonialism in the face of neo-liberal capitalist forces intent on re-shaping place.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden History
    CAMDEN HISTORY Journal of the Camden Historical Society March 2019 Volume 4 Number 7 CAMDEN HISTORY Journal of the Camden Historical Society Inc. ISSN 1445 -1549 Editor: Dr Ian Willis Management Committee President: Dr Ian Willis Vice Presidents: John Wrigley OAM, Cathey Shepherd Secretary: Lee Stratton Treasurer: Kathy Lester Immediate Past President: Bob Lester General Committee: Julie Wrigley, Robert Wheeler, Sharon Greene, Cathy Shep- herd, Frances Warner, Warren Sims Honorary Solicitors: Warren & Warren Society contact: P.O. Box 566, Camden, NSW 2570. Online <http://www.camdenhistory.org.au> Meetings Meetings are held at 7.30 p.m. on the second Wednesday of the month except in Jan- uary. They are held in the Museum. Visitors are always welcome. Museum The Museum is located at 40 John Street, Camden, phone 4655 3400. It is open Thursday to Sunday 11 a.m. to 4 p.m., except at Christmas. Visits by schools and groups are encouraged. Please contact the Museum to make arrangements. Entry is free. Camden History, Journal of the Camden Historical Society Inc The Journal is published in March and September each year. The Editor would be pleased to receive articles broadly covering the history of the Camden district . Cor- respondence can be sent to the Society ’s postal address. The views expressed by authors in journal articles are solely those of the authors and not necessarily en- doresed by the Camden Historical Society. Donations Donations made to the Society are tax deductible. The accredited value of objects donated to the Society are eligible for tax deduction. Front Cover William Macarthur brought in the "The Waratah Camel- lia ” anenomiflora ( The Camden Park Camellia ) arrived in Port Jackson in 1831 on HMS Sovereign.
    [Show full text]
  • GCC Turner Road Precinct Heritage Assessment
    GCC Turner Road Precinct Heritage Assessment Report prepared for the Growth Centres Commission March 2007 Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled GCC Turner Road Precinct—Heritage Assessment, undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Godden Mackay Logan operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2000. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 06-0469 1 Draft Report 19 January 2007 06-0469 2 Final Report 19 March 2007 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background..........................................................................................................................................1 1.2 The Precinct.........................................................................................................................................1 1.3 Existing Heritage Listings ....................................................................................................................1 1.4 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................1 1.5 Methodology and Terminology ...........................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Apples, Pears, Quinces, Plums & Citrus
    Heritage Apples, Pears, Quinces, plums & citrus – who, what where? C.6000 apple cultivars were listed in the UK (AGJ, 1996); c.1000 listed in Australia (ibid). Today (2005) there are around 10 cultivars of apples commercially grown in Australia. The Society has for some time fielded a number of enquiries from people wanting to rescue threatened orchards or dying fruit trees, replant or reinstate depleted or lost orchards in historic gardens. As well as from people wanting to contact skilled budders and grafters to ‘re-work’ over-grown old trees in –situ, and donate bud-wood to propagators who can keep ‘out-of-fashion’ old varieties alive etc. The following list is a start, responding to these kinds of needs. We would welcome further information on growers, collections, sources of expertise etc around Australia. Tasmania 1. Woodbridge Fruit Trees (Bob Magnus) PO Box Woodbridge Hill, Bruny Island, Tas 7162 Ph: (03) 6267 4430 Heritage apples (300 cultivars, only 100 cultivars grown each year, grafted on dwarf stock), quinces (11 cultivars – the national collection), hazelnuts, plums and pears. Runs workshops and demonstrations. It is best to mail /phone first, best between 8-10am. For a catalogue of his cultivars, send a stamped addressed envelope. 2. Allen Gilbert & Laurie Cosgrove, Coolangatta Road, Bruny Island, Tas Ph: (03) 6293 1214 Wrote the 2002 Oxford Companion to Australian Gardens entry on orchards / pomology and a 3/2007 Australian Garden History journal article on historic apples, lost cultivars, and conservation issues arising. 3. Huon Valley Apple and Heritage Museum / Grove Research Station, Huonville, Channel Highway, south of Hobart.
    [Show full text]
  • Dcs Cm Mp Hse 008 - Camden Gas Project European Heritage Management Sub Plan
    DCS_CM_MP_HSE_008 - CAMDEN GAS PROJECT EUROPEAN HERITAGE MANAGEMENT SUB PLAN AGL Upstream Investments Pty Limited April 2017 Document Control European Heritage Management Sub Plan Approval: Authorising Officer Kelly Franke Title Operations Superintendent Signature Date 18 April 2017 Revision Status: Revision Date Prepared By Checked By Approved By Comments 0 August 2008 URS Australia Pty Ltd A. Clifton D. Kelly 1 April 2014 URS Australia Pty Ltd A. Clifton D. Chia 2 April 2015 AGL Upstream A. Clifton K. Franke Investments Pty Ltd 3 April 2016 AGL Upstream A. Clifton K. Franke Investments Pty Ltd 4 April 2017 AGL Upstream A. Clifton K. Franke Investments Pty Ltd DCS_CM_MP_HSE_008 Page 1 of 31 Uncontrolled when printed European Heritage Management Sub Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Objective ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Target ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3. Responsibilities .................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Requirements .................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Key Licence/ Development Consent
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Macarthur Investigation Area Aboriginal and Historic Heritage Gap Analysis • Updated February 2017 0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HERITAGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HERITAGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS Greater Macarthur Investigation Area Aboriginal and Historic Heritage - Gap Analysis and Future Direction Final Department of Planning & Environment Updated 03 February 2017 Greater Macarthur Investigation Area Aboriginal and Historic Heritage Gap Analysis • Updated February 2017 0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HERITAGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS AUTHOR/HERITAGE ADVISOR Alan Williams, Matthew Kelly, Ngaire Richards, Laressa Berehowyj, Anita Yousif PROPONENT Department of Planning & Environment Greater Macarthur Aboriginal and Historic Cultural PROJECT NAME Heritage - Gap Analysis and Future Direction Various REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION DATE 3rd February 2017 AHMS INTERNAL REVIEW/SIGN OFF WRITTEN BY DATE VERSION REVIEWED APPROVED AW, MK, NR 2.4.15 1 Preliminary Fenella Atkinson Susan McIntyre-Tamwoy Susan McIntyre- AW, MK 25.5.15 2 Final Draft Tamwoy Susan McIntyre-Tamwoy AW 7.10.15 3. Preliminary Minor edits Susan McIntyre-Tamwoy Final LB, AY 19.7.16 4. Final Addressed public Susan McIntyre-Tamwoy exhibition comments SMcT, LB, AY 15.10.16 5. Final with Updated maps /minor Susan McIntyre-Tamwoy updated maps edits 6. section 3.3 to address client SMcT 24.10.16 added comments Susan McIntyre-Tamwoy SMcT 03.02.2017 7 Client comments Susan McIntyre-Tamwoy Copyright and Moral Rights Historical sources and reference materials used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced in figure captions or in text citations. Reasonable effort has been made to identify, contact, acknowledge and obtain permission to use material from the relevant copyright owners. Unless otherwise specified in the contract terms for this project AHMS: Vests copyright of all material produced by AHMS (but excluding pre-existing material and material in which copyright is held by a third party) in the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title); Retains the use of all material produced by AHMS for this project for AHMS ongoing business and for professional presentations, academic papers or publications.
    [Show full text]