DOCSLIB.ORG

{TEXTBOOK} Edward IV & Elizabeth Woodville: a True Romance Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{TEXTBOOK} Edward IV & Elizabeth Woodville: a True Romance Ebook EDWARD IV & ELIZABETH WOODVILLE: A TRUE ROMANCE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Amy Licence | 304 pages | 01 Sep 2017 | Amberley Publishing | 9781445654935 | English | Chalford, United Kingdom The White Queen: 5 Historical Accuracies (& 5 Historical Inaccuracies) The act stated that before the coronation of Richard III 6 July , the Three Estates of the Realm presented to the king a petition, detailing his rightful title to the crown of England. Richard III thus dated his reign from 26 June and this is the petition subsequently ratified as the Titulus Regius by the Parliament of January A Year Book of provides further supporting evidence. Stillington was a former Chancellor and a doctor of civil and canon law. There thus survives a considerable body of evidence testifying both to the veracity of the pre-contract and to its central role in the accession of Richard III. Two days later Richard sent a copy of the petition to the Calais garrison and, in January , Parliament ratified the document as the Titulus Regius. Until relatively recently historians questioned the very existence of Eleanor Talbot, a situation remedied by the research of Dr John Ashdown-Hill. Significantly, Richard III did not reward Stillington during his reign, quashing any suggestion that Richard bribed the bishop to connive in a plot to take the throne. His heavy-handed approach shows that it was too dangerous to investigate the matter further, and that his claim to the throne rested on a policy of ruthless censorship. Rotuli Parliamentorum Strachey ed. Year Books consisted of contemporary legal reports. For a list of English bishops and bishoprics see J. However, this displays a fundamental ignorance of the key mediaeval art of rhetoric, especially in setting out legal cases, in which arguments were assembled in order of importance gradatio using auxesis and other rhetorical devices until the most important argument is stated at the end as a climax. With grateful thanks to non-fiction author Annette Carson for this important clarification. First published in the Ricardian Bulletin magazine of March , pp. First published in the Ricardian Bulletin magazine of June , pp. Despite an initial emphasis on the political importance of a marital union with the eldest daughter of Edward IV, Henry's fear of the pre-contract was subsequently made manifest in his claim to rule in his own right as heir of Lancaster and his insistence that his title to the crown did not depend on Yorkist royal blood. This made them embark on a continued march for another 16 kilometres and they eventually made camp outside Tewkesbury where the Yorkist army finally caught up with them. As the day broke, Margaret of Anjou sought shelter at a religious house. The Lancastrian army numbered 6 soldiers and the Yorkist 5 It was a decisive victory which effectively eradicated any hope the Lancastrians had held of recovering the throne for Henry VI and not least for the Prince of Wales; Edward of Westminster, not least because when the battle was over, the latter was dead. It is not absolutely clear at which point during the battle the Prince of Wales was killed, some sources claim he was killed in the battle itself, others that he tried to run and was killed during the flight, others still that he was caught and brought to Edward IV, only to be executed. After the battle, Edward decided to break sanctuary, dragging the hiding men out and executing the commanders, one of which was Edmund Beaufort, and with him the House of Beaufort was basically exterminated, with the exception of Margaret Beaufort and her son Henry. A few days after the battle, Margaret of Anjou surrendered to Edward IV, most likely distraught by the death of her son and in effect, the death of the House of Lancaster. She was brought to London as a prisoner of war and imprisoned in the Tower where her husband Henry VI was already held. The same night Henry VI died in the Tower, most likely murdered either on the orders of Edward himself or his brother Richard of Gloucester. York, Richard Plantagenet, who 7 years earlier, in , had been appointed Protector of England during the mental breakdown of Henry VI, had through his descent from Edward III on both his parents side a claim to the throne in the event Henry should die without an heir. When they all returned a year later, Richard of York after the rest, they soon took charge of London and the south of England, as well as took Henry as a captive at the Battle of Northampton July 10 th. York tried to claim the throne, but this was not well received among the other nobles. Instead he managed to persuade the captive Henry VI to disinherit his own son and make York himself his heir. It was her forces the Yorkist troops would be meeting at the battle of Wakefield. He also sent for assistance from his son Edward the future Edward IV who was on the border regions to Wales, but before any additional soldiers could arrive, York left his castle on December Yet another theory is that a small group Lancastrians made their way to the castle under a false banner, making York think that it was the reinforcements that arrived. A third theory is that both armies had come to an agreement on which day the battle would take place; January 6, but that the Lancaster army broke the agreement. Richard of York died in the battle while his son Edmund, Earl of Rutland, supposedly tried to flee over the Wakefield bridge where he was apprehended and murdered. The heads of York, Rutland and their ally, the Earl of Salisbury was placed over Micklebar Gate, the west entrance to the city of York, and their bodies buried at Pontefract. Under denna period intog Edward IV tronen. Today must be said to be the absolute startingpoint of the Tudor era. It is today of course the anniverasary of the Battle of Bosworth, which can also be said to have been the last great battle of the Wars of the Roses. Henry Tudor had left his 14 year long perido as an exile by way of Harfleur and without any mishaps crossed the channel and arrived in England on the 1st of August and landed in Wales on the 7 th. Being of Welsh descent Henry had expected more of a support, but he had been away for a long time and had also been not much more than a child when he left, and as a result his arrival was met to a large extent with indifference and silence. Only a small number of his fellow Welshmen decided to join him on his march further into the country, the most prominent member of the following being Rhys ap Thomas who must be said to have been a leading person in the west of Wales. He had, as a reward for refusing to participate in a rebellion against Richard III, received the position as lieutenant over west Wales by the king, but was successfully courted by Henry Tudor and decided to join the slowly growing army. Richard had anticipated the arrival of Henry since mid-July, but when news of the landing reached him on August 11 th , it still took him a couple of days before his loeds found out that the king was mobilising his forces and also was in need of them and their armies. Richard arrived on the 20th of August and joined Norfolk while Northumberland arrived the day after. Loyalty would have been a tricky thing for Lord Stanley during these days; on one side the king to whom he had sworn obedience, on the other side not only his wife and her son, but also his own son. Scholar - Women Also Know History Post a comment. Friday, 1 May Did the White Queen really marry her king? May 1st is traditionally the date given for one of the most famous and romantic royal weddings in history. For it was on May Day that Elizabeth Woodville is said to have married Edward IV in a secret ceremony that turned her into Queen of England and altered royal history forever. But even now, five centuries and more on, the question remains - did the White Queen really marry her king? The remains of the tree where Edward and Elizabeth are said to have fallen in love. There's no point looking for the evidence. There are no written records of Elizabeth and Edward's marriage in a church. Registration of events like weddings wasn't formerly introduced until the 16th century. Besides, a marriage contract is a verbal contract - the paperwork just confirms it took place. However, the secrecy of the set up has led to all kinds of allegations that this union was never legal. Edward IV married for love but also to assert his independence. There's little doubt that within days of Edward finally admitting to his secret wedding, his new wife was accepted as just that. He lost the trust and friendship of Warwick, his cousin and "Kingmaker. I don't need any more proof that this must have been a love match. Perhaps he saw in his wife, a woman equal to keeping up with the shining splendor of his Camelot. I have now read a good bit about him and have a special interest in Edward IV. Edward wanted his court to be similar to the myth of Arthur and Camelot. It's very interesting to read how he thought of this and even had a round table.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alaris Capture Pro Software
    A Personal View of the Road to Bosworth Field ARNOLD J. JAMES DURING THE COMPILATION of a comprehensive reference work on the Parliamentary Representation of Wales for the period 1536 to 1979,l an opportunity presented itself to study certain aspects of the fortnight in August 1485 that saw King Richard III of England lose his life at Bosworth Field, and Henry Tudor claim the throne of England. So much has been written about that fortnight that at first it was thought there was little more that could be written. However, there are several points that, perhaps, can be put forward for consideration. One of these is Rhys ap Thomas' route through Wales, another the disposition of the Stanley forces and finally the site of the battle itself. In the absence of reasonable proof, speculation is, of course, inevitable, and the following is no exception. Henry Tudor’s landing near Dale, probably at Mill Bay, in the late afternoon or early evening of Sunday 7 August 1485 is now accepted.2 It is also more than probable that a secondary, though minor, landing took place on the eastern side of the entrance to Milford Haven at ‘Nangle’. Henry was in a most difficult situation. In those days of intrigue, suspicion, rumour and, above all, treachery, he had no real way of ascertaining where, if any, his support lay. Treachery was the keystone of political intrigue. Great magnates such as Sir William Stanley, Sir John Savage, and Rhys ap Thomas were to prove traitors to King Richard, as had the Duke of Buckingham two years earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Woodville and Margery Kempe, Female Agency in Late Medieval England
    ABSTRACT “She Should Have More if She Were Ruled and Guided by Them”: Elizabeth Woodville and Margery Kempe, Female Agency in Late Medieval England Laura Christine Oliver, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Beth Allison Barr, Ph.D. This thesis argues that while patriarchy was certainly present in England during the late medieval period, women of the middle and upper classes were able to exercise agency to a certain degree through using both the patriarchal bargain and an economy of makeshifts. While the methods used by women differed due to the resources available to them, the agency afforded women by the patriarchal bargain and economy of makeshifts was not limited to the aristocracy. Using Elizabeth Woodville and Margery Kempe as cases studies, this thesis examines how these women exercised at least a limited form of agency. Additionally, this thesis examines whether ordinary women have access to the same agency as elite women. Although both were exceptional women during this period, they still serve as ideal case studies because of the sources available about them and their status as role models among their contemporaries. “She Should Have More if She Were Ruled and Guided By Them”: Elizabeth Woodville and Margery Kempe, Female Agency in Late Medieval England by Laura Christine Oliver, B.A. A Thesis Approved by the Department of History ___________________________________ Jeffrey S. Hamilton, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee ___________________________________ Beth Allison Barr, Ph.D., Chairperson ___________________________________ Julie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Lady Eleanor Talbot's Other Husband
    Lady Eleanor Talbot’s Other Husband: Sir Thomas Butler, heir of Sudeley, and his family JOHN-ASHDOWN HILL Although King Henry VII tried very hard to supress the fact, it is well known that in asserting his claim to the throne in 1483, Richard III had cited a prior contract of marriage between his brother, the late king Edward IV, and the Lady Eleanor Talbot. A marriage contract which, together with Edward’s clandestine second marriage with Elizabeth Woodville, made all the children of that second marriage illegitimate. It is now also established that Lady Eleanor Talbot was, at the time of her alleged marriage with Edward IV, a young widow, having been previously married to Sir Thomas Butler. Indeed, the Titulus Regius of 1484 refers to both Lady Eleanor and Elizabeth Woodville under their married names, as ‘Eleanor Butler’ and ‘Elizabeth Grey’ respectively. In this article, however, to avoid confusion, the consistent practice is to refer to women by their maiden surnames, hence ‘Eleanor Talbot’ and ‘Elizabeth Woodville’. Previous writers have casually suggested that Richard III selected Lady Eleanor Talbot to be named as ‘the lady of the precontract’ because there were no members of her family around to contradict him. This article establishes that on the contrary there were numerous relatives of both Lady Eleanor and Sir Thomas Butler living in the Richard’s reign and that these living relatives apparently had no difficulty in accepting Richard III and in prospering under him.1 Sir Thomas Butler is a shadowy figure and only three facts seem to be generally known about him: that he was the only son and heir of Ralph Butler, Lord Sudeley, that in about 1450 he married Lady Eleanor Talbot, daughter of the first earl of Shrewbury, and that about ten years later he died, leaving no children.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard 111 Society, Inc. Volume XXIII No. 2 Summer, 1998 Register Staff
    Richard 111 Society, Inc. Volume XXIII No. 2 Summer, 1998 Register Staff EDITOR: Carole M. Rike 4702 Dryades St. l New Orleans, LA 70115 (504) 897-9673 0 1998 Richard III Society, Inc., American Branch. No part may be FAX (504) 897-0125 l e-mail: carole@word-cateringcorn reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means - mecbanica2, RICARDIAN READING EDITOR: Myrna Smith electrkal or photocopying, recording or information storage retrieval - without written permission jam the Society. Articles submitted by Rt. 1 Box 232B l Hooks, TX 7.5561 members remain the property of the author. The Ricardian Register is (903) 547-6609 l FAX: (903) 792-7398 or (903) 628-2658 published four times per year. Subscriptions are available at $18.00 annually. ARTIST: Susan Dexter The Richard III Society is a nonprofit, educational corporation. 1510 Delaware Avenue l New Castle, PA 161052674 Dues, grants and contributions are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law. Dues are $30 annually for U.S. Addresses; $35 for international. Each additional family member is $5. Members of the American In This Issue Society are also members of the English Society. Members also receive the English publications. All Society publications and items for sale may be purchased either direct at the U.K. Member’s price, or Mysterious Case of the White Boar, via the American Branch when available. Papers may be borrowed James G. Gilbert ......... 4 from the English Librarian, but books are not sent overseas. When a U.S. Member visits the U.K., all meetings, expeditions and other Conclusion .........
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid - Dynevor Estate Records, (GB 0210 DYNEVOR)
    Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Cymorth chwilio | Finding Aid - Dynevor Estate Records, (GB 0210 DYNEVOR) Cynhyrchir gan Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Generated by Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Argraffwyd: Mai 05, 2017 Printed: May 05, 2017 Wrth lunio'r disgrifiad hwn dilynwyd canllawiau ANW a seiliwyd ar ISAD(G) Ail Argraffiad; rheolau AACR2; ac LCSH This description follows NLW guidelines based on ISAD(G) Second Edition; AACR2; and LCSH https://archifau.llyfrgell.cymru/index.php/dynevor-estate-records archives.library .wales/index.php/dynevor-estate-records Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Allt Penglais Aberystwyth Ceredigion United Kingdom SY23 3BU 01970 632 800 01970 615 709 [email protected] www.llgc.org.uk Dynevor Estate Records, Tabl cynnwys | Table of contents Gwybodaeth grynodeb | Summary information .............................................................................................. 3 Hanes gweinyddol / Braslun bywgraffyddol | Administrative history | Biographical sketch ......................... 3 Natur a chynnwys | Scope and content .......................................................................................................... 4 Trefniant | Arrangement .................................................................................................................................. 5 Nodiadau | Notes ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Pwyntiau
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Bosworth
    Lesson 2 – The Battle of Bosworth. L.O. To understand the implications of The Battle of Bosworth Remember if you have any questions about your learning please email [email protected] The Wars of the Roses King Richard III Civil war had been raging through Richard III was a Yorkist king but he was not popular. England for 30 years during the People were very suspicious of how he had become th mid-15 century. This became known as king. The Wars of Roses because each side of the battle were represented by a rose. His brother, Edward IV, was king so when he died it should have been Edward’s eldest son who became king. The boy, also called Edward, was only 12 years old. Richard was made protector of the realm until the child was old enough to be crowned king. The red rose was the The white rose was badge of the the badge of the Lancastrians. Yorkists. Both sides believed they had a right to the throne and crown of England. King Richard’s Past France A campaign began to prove the boy could Henry Tudor, the leader of the Lancastrian side, got not be king, so Richard was crowned king. some money from King Charles VIII of France. His two nephews were imprisoned in the Tower of London. Charles had his own mission and wanted to capture Brittany, so he hoped that a battle in England would They were never seen in public again. take the attention away from his own plans. It is thought he had them killed, so that they could not become king instead of him.
    [Show full text]
  • Eudora Welty
    REVISTA ANGLO SAXONICA SER. III N. 5 2013 A NNGLO SAXO ICA ANGLO SAXONICA SER. III N. 5 2013 DIRECÇÃO / GENERAL EDITORS Isabel Fernandes (ULICES) João Almeida Flor (ULICES) Mª Helena Paiva Correia (ULICES) COORDENAÇÃO / EXECUTIVE EDITOR Teresa Malafaia (ULICES) EDITOR ADJUNTO / ASSISTANT EDITOR Ana Raquel Lourenço Fernandes (ULICES) CO-EDITOR ADJUNTO / CO-EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Sara Paiva Henriques (ULICES) REVISÃO DE TEXTO / COPY EDITORS Ana Daniela Coelho (ULICES) Helena Carneiro (ULICES) EDIÇÃO Centro de Estudos Anglísticos da Universidade de Lisboa University of Lisbon Centre for English Studies DESIGN, PAGINAÇÃO E ARTE FINAL Inês Mateus IMPRESSÃO E ACABAMENTO Várzea da Rainha Impressores, S.A. - Óbidos, Portugal TIRAGEM 150 exemplares ISSN 0873-0628 DEPÓSITO LEGAL 86 102/95 PUBLICAÇÃO APOIADA PELA FUNDAÇÃO PARA A CIÊNCIA E A TECNOLOGIA CONTENTS/ÍNDICE THEMATIC SECTION / SECÇÃO TEMÁTICA EUDORA WELTY INTRODUCTION Diana V. Almeida . .11 HOW WELTY DOESN’T CRUSADE Maria Teresa Castilho . 17 “ALL THINGS ARE DOUBLE”: EUDORA WELTY’S PRISMATIC VIEW Maria Antónia Lima . 35 ’THE WAITING ARMS OF MISSOURI’: HUMAN CONNECTIONS AND SHELTERED LIVES IN EUDORA WELTY’S THE OPTIMIST’S DAUGHTER Isabel Maria Fernandes Alves . 47 “WE NEED TO WRITE WITH LOVE”: WELTY’S POLITICAL VIEW DURING THE CIVIL RIGHTS YEARS Diana V. Almeida . .65 EUDORA WELTY: A VIEW FROM BRAZIL Tereza Marques de Oliveira Lima . 89 VERSIONS OF INSIGHT: EUDORA WELTY’S ESSAYS Jan Nordby Gretlund . 103 DEFINITELY NOT A SNAPSHOT. ON WELTY’S HELENA ARDEN Mário Avelar . 115 ESSAYS/ ESTUDOS PATHWAYS INTO THE IRISH SHORT STORY Nuala Ní Chonchúir . 127 BRITISH LITERATURE IN PORTUGUESE LITERARY EDUCATION DURING THE ESTADO NOVO Zsófia Gombár .
    [Show full text]
  • Political History
    POLITICAL HISTORY ALDERMAN Clifford Lindsey Blood-red the Roses: the Wars of the Roses Hardback Date of Pub: 1973 SBN: 561-00172-3 Publisher: Bailey Bros & Swinfen Limited Subjects covered: Campaigns; politics Synopsis: ‘For thirty-five years the Houses of York and Lancaster engaged in a bloody struggle for the throne of England’ – a popularised account of the campaigns and the political history of the period ALLISON Richard BROWN Carole Medieval Realms Paperback Date of Pub: 1990 ISBN: 185-276-120-2 Publisher: Folens Subjects covered: Women; church; castles; towns; trades; crusades; Peasants Revolt; Richard III Synopsis: Social and political history of the Middle Ages for primary school children, with illustrations, questions and ideas for activities. ALLMAND Christopher Editor New Cambridge Medieval History, Vol VII c1415 - c1500 Hardback Date of Pub: 1998 ISBN: 0521-382-963 Publisher: Cambridge University Press Subjects covered: Europe; culture; art; Europe Synopsis: New edition of the standard history of the Medieval world: sections deal with government, cultural and artistic life and the political history of individual countries (“Lancastrian England” by Edward Powell and “Yorkist and Early Tudor England” by Rosemary Horrox) ARCHER Rowena E Editor Crown, Government and People in the 15th Century Hardback Date of Pub: 1995 ISBN: 0312-125-917 Publisher: St Martin's Press Subjects covered: Margaret of Anjou; Henry VI; Henry VII; Duchy of Lancaster; Pastons; Calais Synopsis: Ten essays from a conference at Manchester College, Oxford
    [Show full text]
  • Wales and the Wars of the Roses Cambridge University Press C
    WALES AND THE WARS OF THE ROSES CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS C. F. CLAY, Manager ILcinfcott: FETTER LANE, E.C. EBmburgfj: 100 PRINCES STREET §& : WALES AND THE WARS OF THE ROSES BY HOWELL T. EVANS, M.A. St John's College, Cambridge Cambridge at the University Press 1915 : £ V*. ©amtrrtrge PRINTED BY JOHN CLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS PREFACE AS its title suggests, the present volume is an attempt to ** examine the struggle between Lancaster and York from the standpoint of Wales and the Marches. Contemporary chroniclers give us vague and fragmentary reports of what happened there, though supplementary sources of informa- tion enable us to piece together a fairly consecutive and intelligible story. From the first battle of St Albans to the accession of Edward IV the centre of gravity of the military situation was in the Marches : Ludlow was the chief seat of the duke of York, and the vast Mortimer estates in mid-Wales his favourite recruiting ground. It was here that he experienced his first serious reverse—at Ludford Bridge; it was here, too, that his son Edward, earl of March, won his way to the throne—at Mortimer's Cross. Further, Henry Tudor landed at Milford Haven, and with a predominantly Welsh army defeated Richard III at Bosworth. For these reasons alone unique interest attaches to Wales and the Marches in this thirty years' war; and it is to be hoped that the investigation will throw some light on much that has hitherto remained obscure. 331684 vi PREFACE I have ventured to use contemporary Welsh poets as authorities ; this has made it necessary to include a chapter on their value as historical evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard 3 Closes in 1485 (Battle of Bosworth)
    Reigned 1483–1485; play opens in 1471 (death of H6); richard 3 closes in 1485 (Battle of Bosworth). Name and title Birth date Death date Age in play Age at death Queen Margaret of Anjou (married. Henry VI in 1455) 1430 1482 41/-- 52 Widow of HVI. Their son Edward died one day before his father’s execution. She personally coordinated the Lancastrian armies, often leading them herself. Was hated in England; considered the best asset the Yorkists had. She killed Richard of York at Tewksbury. Cecily Neville, Duchess of York 1415 1495 56/70 80 Mother of Edward IV, Richard III, George Duke of Clarence, Edmund of Rutland (dead). Pious and refined widow to the previous Richard Duke of York (not in this play). King Edward IV 1442 1483 29/-- 41 Brother of George and Richard, father of the two young princes Edward and Richard, and husband to Elizabeth. He is close to his deathbed as the play begins. Queen Elizabeth Woodville Grey 1431 1492 40/54 61 Daughter of Earl Rivers, brother to Anthony Rivers. Her daughter Elizabeth, who will be married to Henry VII, is 16 at the time of the play. Edward, Prince of Wales; after King Edward V Nov 1479 Sep 1483 1/-- 12 Oldest son of EdIV. He is one of the “princes in the Tower,” although as soon as his father dies he is technically king. Richard Plantagenet, Duke of York Aug 1473 Sep 1483 --/died 9 Younger son of EdIV. Betrothed at age 4 to Anne Mowbray, aged 3 (she was daughter of John Mowbray, 4th Duke of Norfolk); they married when both were 6 years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Living in an Early Tudor Castle: Households, Display, and Space, 1485-1547 Audrey Maria Thorstad
    Living in an Early Tudor Castle: Households, Display, and Space, 1485-1547 Audrey Maria Thorstad Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Leeds School of History November 2015 2 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Audrey Maria Thorstad to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2015 The University of Leeds and Audrey Maria Thorstad 3 Acknowledgements The last four years of this research would not have been possible without the immense support form a great number of people. I must firstly thank my supervisors – past and present – all who have supported, challenged, and encouraged me along the way. To my current supervisors, Professor Emilia Jamzoriak and Axel Müller, a huge thank you is due. They have been endlessly helpful, critical, and whose insight helped to bring this project to fruition. Further thanks to Dr Paul Cavill who told me to ‘jump in with both feet’, which I have done and have not looked back since. I must also thank Professor Stephen Alford, whose knowledge on the Tudor period is infinite and whose support is much appreciated. Last, but certainly not least, my appreciation goes out to Kate Giles who helped make the viva experience a little less scary and a lot more fun.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambert Simnel and the King from Dublin
    Lambert Simnel and the King from Dublin GORDON SMITH Throughout his reign (1485-1509) Richard III's supplanter Henry VII was troubled by pretenders to his throne, the most important of whom were Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck.1 Both are popularly remembered perhaps because their names have a pantomime sound to them, and a pantomime context seems a suitable one for characters whom Henry accused of being not real pretenders but mere impersonators. Nevertheless, there have been some doubts about the imposture of Perkin, although there appear to have been none before now about Lambert.2 As A.F. Pollard observed, 'no serious historian has doubted that Lambert was an impostor'.3 This observation is supported by the seemingly straightforward traditional story about the impostor Lambert Simnel, who was crowned king in Dublin but defeated at the battle of Stoke in 1487, and pardoned by Henry VII. This story can be recognised in Francis Bacon's influential history of Henry's reign, published in 1622, where Lambert first impersonated Richard, Duke of York, the younger son of Edward IV, before changing his imposture to Edward, Earl of Warwick.4 Bacon and the sixteenth century historians derived their account of the 1487 insurrection mainly from Polydore Vergil's Anglica Historia, but Vergil, in his manuscript compiled between 1503 and 1513, said only that Simnel counterfeited Warwick.5 The impersonation of York derived from a life of Henry VII, written around 1500 by Bernard André, who failed to name Lambert.6 Bacon's York-Warwick imitation therefore looks like a conflation of the impostures from André and Vergil.
    [Show full text]