DOCSLIB.ORG

Taxonomic Studies of Ants Species Collected in Khartoum State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taxonomic Studies of Ants Species Collected in Khartoum State Taxonomic Studies of Ants Species Collected in Khartoum State By: Awatif Khidir Omer Yousif El Hag A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Zoology infulfillment Master of Science in Zoology Zoology Department, Faculty of Science University of Khartoum December, 200 © Awatif Khidir Omer Dedication To soul of my brother To my Beloved Family Awatif I Acknowledgements It gives me a great pleasure to thank all those who contributed advice and help in this work. It is appropriate to mention several people who made suggestions, and provided editing. Deep gratitude is due to my supervisor Dr. Tigani M.H.Allam for his help, discussions and encouragement, thanks go to Dr. Sumaia Abukashwa for her help and advice. I would like to express my gratitude to Al-Zubair Mohammed Salih Prize for Innovation and Scientific Excellence for generous financial support. I am greatly indebted to Marcus Stuben (University of Wurzburg Germany, for providing me with some books and articles which were not available in Sudan. Many thanks to Dr. Mustafa Rizig from Egypt for his kind assistance, provision of books, and journals, for his keen guidance encouragement and his promise to help to put in the name of Sudan at the website of ants, thanks go to Dr. Collingwood of Liverpool Museum who identified some of the ants to species level. Of the all, thanks are especially extending to Dr. Brian Taylor (University of Nottingham- UK) for his great assistance in identification some of the ants to species level. II Also thanks to Dr. Brian Fisher (California Academy of Sciences-USA), who identified some ants to the species level and imaged the ants to put it at the website www.antweb.org as ants of Sudan. I thank also Dr. Donat Agosti (American Musem of Natural History and Smithsonian Institution) who sent me the satellite map of Khartoum State, and thanks to his wife Livia Agosti (Deputy Head of the Political Affairs Division II African/Middle East) for delivering my specimens to Dr. Brain Fisher. Thanks to the Remote Sensing Centre (University of Khartoum) for locating collection site of the specimen in satellite map. Thanks to Dr. Abdullah Gomaa who gave me the GPS (Global Position System), to Dr. Zuhair Nour Eldeim for his advice and to Dr. Omran Fadl for his help. Not least but last, thanks are due to my colleagues in the Sudan Institute for Natural Sciences (SIFNS) for their encouragement and help with typing the thesis. III Table of Contents Contents Page Dedication……………………………………………………..……. I Acknowledgements………………………..…………………….….. II Table of Contents……………………………………………………. IV List of Tables…………………………………………..………........ IX List of Figures……………………………………..…………….….. X List of Plates………………………………………………………… XI list of Appendices XIII ................................................................................ Abstract………………………………………….…………….……. XIV Chapter 1: Introduction………………...…………………….… 1 1.1. Social Organization…………………….………………..…….. 1 1.2. Feeding ………………………………………………...…. 2 1.3. Objective of this study ……………………………………..….. 3 Chapter 2: Literature Review…………………………..…………..... 4 2.1. The Importance of ants ………………………………………… 4 2.2. Family Formicidae 5 ……………………………………………. 2.2.1. Main Differential Anatomical Features of 5 Formicidae…….. 2.2.2. Taxonomy …………………………………………….…… 10 2.2.3. The Classification and Origin 10 ……………………………… 2.2.4. Subfamilies 11 ………………………………………………… IV 2.3. The Ants of Sudan 15 ……………………………………………… 2.3.1. History and Geography 15 ………………………………….. 2.4. Genera 18 …………………………………………………………. 2.4.1. Cardiocondyla …………………………………………….. 18 2.4.2. 18 Crematogaster……………………………………………… 2.4.3. 18 Monomorium……………………………………………………… 2.4.3.1. Monomorium bicolor Emery 19 (1877)………………………. 2.4.3.2. Monomorium areniphilium Santschi 19 (1911)…………….. 2.4.3.3. Monomorium destrctor Jerdon (1851) ……………….. 19 2.4.3.4. Monomorium mayri Forel (1902) …………………….. 19 2.4.3.5. Monomorium salomonis Linnaeus (1758) ……………. 20 2.4.4. Pheidole …………………………………………………… 20 2.4.5. Tetramorium …………………………………………………….. 20 2.4.5.1. Tetramorium sericeiventris Emery 21 (1877)………….…….. 2.4.6. Camponotus …………………………………………….….. 21 2.4.6.1.Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) maculates Fabricius (1781) 21 2.4.6.2.Camponotus (Orthonotomyrmex)sericeus Fabricius 21 (1798)………………………………………………… … V 2.4.7. Cataglyphis 22 ………………………………………………………. 2.4.8. Lepisiota 22 …………………………………………………………. 2.4.9. Paratrechina 22 …………………………………………………….. 2.4.10. Anochetus 22 ………………………………………………………. 2.4.1.1. Pachycondyla ………………….………………………… 23 2.5. 23 Karyotyping……………………………………………………… 2.5.1. Chromosomes 23 ……………………………………………… 2.5.2. Somatic chromosomes 24 …………………………………….. 2.5.3. Karyotypes ………………………………………………… 24 2.5.3.1. Karyotpye Study of Ants 24 Chromosomes………………... 2.5.3.2. Karyotpye study of Genus Camponotus 24 …………………. Chapter 3: Material and Methods…………………..………………… 30 3.1. Collection 30 Sites……………………………………………...…… VI 3.2. Specimen collection 32 ……………………………………….……. 3.3. Key used in identification 32 ………………………………..……… 3.4. Karyotyping 32 …………………………………………….……….. Chapter 4: 34 Results……………………………………….…..…………. 4.1. Subfamily: Myrmicinae 37 …………………………………….…… 4.1.1. Genus: Cardiocondyla ………………..…………………… 37 4.1.1.1. Characteristics 37 …………………………………….……. 4.1.1.2. Cardiocondyla emeryi Forel (1881) 37 ……………………. 4.1.1.3. Cardiocondyla elegans Emery (1969) 37 ……………….… 4.1.2. Genus: Crematogaster ……... 39 ……………….…………….. 4.1.2.1. Characteristics 39 ………………………………………………. 4.1.2.2. Crematogaster mimosae Santschi 1914 39 …………….….. 4.1.3. Genus: Monomorium 39 ………………………………………. 4.1.3.1. Characteristics 39 ………………………………………………. 4.1.3.2. Monomorium bicolor Emery (1877) 39 VII …………………… 4.1.3.3. Monomorium areniphilum Santschi 41 (1911)…………..… 4.1.3.4. Monomorium destructor Jerdon 41 (1851)…………….….. 4.1.3.5. Monomorium mayri Forel (1902) 41 ………………….….. 4.1.3.6. Monomorium salomonis Linnaeus (1758) 41 …………….. 4.1.4. Genus: Pheidole 41 ……………………………………….…… 4.1.4.1.Characteristics 41 ……………………………………………….. 4.1.4.2. Pheidole sinaitica Mayr (1862) 42 ……………………….. 4.1.4.3. Pheidole pallidula Nylander (1849) 42 ……………………. 4.1.4.4. Pheidole indica Mayr 42 1879………………….………… 4.1.5.Genus: Tetramorium 44 ……………………………….……….. 4.1.5.1.Characteristics 44 ……………………………………………….. 4.1.5.2. Tetramorium sericeventre Emery 44 (1877)……………….. 4.2. Subfamily: Formicinae 44 ……………………………………..…… 4.2.1. Genus: 44 Camponotus……………………………………….…….. VIII 4.2.1.1.Characteristics 44 ………………………………………………. 4.2.1.2. Camponotus oasium Forel (1890)……………………… 45 4.2.1.3.Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) maculatus Fabricius 45 (1781). ………………………………………………… 4.2.1.4.Camponotus (Orthonomyrmex)sericeus Fabricius 45 (1798). 4.2.1.5. Camponotus (Myrmopiromis) niveoetosus Mayr (1862). 45 4.2.1.6. Camponotus species 45 5.………………………………….. 4.2.1.7. Camponotus species 6. 45 …………………………………. 4.2.2. Genus: 47 Cataglyphis…………………………………………. 4.2.2.1. Characteristics ………………………………………….. 47 4.2.2.2. Cataglyphis desertorum Forel 47 (1894)……………………... 4.2.2.3. Cataglphis lividus Andre (1881) …………….………… 47 4.2.3. Genus: Lepisiota………………………………………………… 47 4.2.3.1. 47 Characteristics……………………………………………….. 4.2.3.2. Lepisiota gracilicornis Forel 1892 48 …………………….. 4.2.3.3. Lepisiota semenovi Ruzsky (1905) ……………………. 48 4.2.4. Genus: Paratrechina 48 ………………………..……………… 4.2.4.1. Characteristics ………………………………………….. 48 4.2.4.2. Paratrechina longicornis Latreille (1802) ………..……. 48 4.3. Subfamily: Ponerinae 51 IX ……………………………………………. 4.3.1. Genus: Anochetus 51 ……………………………………………….. 4.3.1.1. Characteristics …………………………………………. 51 4.3.1.2. Anochetus traegaordhi Mayr (1904) 51 …………………… 4.3.2. Genus: 51 Pachycondyla……………………………………………. 4.3.2.2. Pachycondyla sennaarensis Mayr 52 (1862)………………. 4.4. Karyotypes of Camponotus (Myrmopiromis) niveoetosus and 52 Camponotus species 6 ………………………………………… 4.4.1.Camponotus (Myrmopiromis) niveoetosus 52 ………………… 4.4.2. Camponotus sp6 …………………………………………. 52 Chapter 5: Discussion ………………..……………..……………….. 56 References ………………………………..…………………………… 58 Appendices ……………………………………..…………………….. 66 X List of Tables Table Page Table I: Imatong Mountain Ants…………………………….. 17 Table II: Species of Ants Recorded From Northern Sudan…… 26 Table III: GPS reading of collection sites …………………….. 33 Table IV: Species of Ants found in Khartoum 34 State…………… List of Figures Figure Page Figure 1: Main Features of the Head of Formicidae ……………. 6 Figure. 2: Anatomical Features of a Generalized Ant…………… 7 Figure. 3: Anatomical Features of a Generalized Ant …………… 8 Figure. 4: Anatomical Features of a Generalized Ant……………. 9 Figure (5): Genus: Cardiocondyla ……………………………… 37 Figure (6): Genus: Crematogaster ………………………………. 39 Figure (7): Genus: Monomorium ………………………………… 39 Figure (8): Genus: Phediole ……………………………………... 42 Figure (9): Genus: Tertamorium ………………………………… 45 Figure (10): Genus: Camponotus ……………………………….. 45 Figure (11): Genus: Cataglyphis ………………………………… 48 Figure (12): Genus : Lepisiota…………………………………… 48 Figure (13): Genus : Paratrechina ……………………………… 49 Figure (14): Genus: Anochetus………………………………...... 52 Figure (15): Genus : Pachycondyla……………………………. 53 Figure (16 a): A spread metaphase plate. The number of 53 chromosomes was 2n=21……………………… Figure (16 b): An Idiogram of Somatic Chromosomes of 53 Camponotus niveoetosus arranged in pairs……. Figure (17 a): A spread metaphase plate. The number of 54 chromosomes was 2n=25 XI Figure (17b): An Idiogram of Somatic Chromosomes of 54 Camponotus species6 arranged in pairs……. XII List of Plates Plate (I): Acacia fistula Tree……………………………… Plate (Π): Nest of Aphenomyrmex sp……………………………………… Plate (III): Map Showing Location of Khartoum State……………… Plate (IV): Satellite Map
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pdf 409.95 K
    Egypt. Acad. J. biolog. Sci., 1(2): 109 - 123 (2008) E. mail. [email protected] ISSN: 1687 – 8809 Received: 20/10/ 2008 Biochemical differences between the virgin queens and workers of the Ant, Camponotus maculatus (Fabricius) Laila Sayed Hamouda Department of Entomology , Faculty of Science , Ain Shams Univ., Cairo , Egypt. ABSTRACT The present data showed that the activities of all the tested enzymes except acetylcholinesterase (α,β-esterases, acid phosphatase and glutathione S-transeferase) were significantly higher in the whole body homogenates of the virgin queens ant, Camponotus maculatus (Fabricius) than that recorded for the workers. Also, the concentration of total soluble proteins of the virgin queens was higher than of workers. These proteins were electrophoretically separated into 22 bands (258.6 to 35.4KDa) in the virgin queen samples while they were separated into 19 bands (216.7 to 35.4KDa) in the worker samples. Ten protein bands were common between the two castes (108.1, 103.9, 99.8, 94.6, 63.7, 61.3, 55.9, 48.1, 40.6 and 35.4KDa) and the remaining bands were characteristic for each caste .Finally, there was difference in the genomic DNA of the two studied castes. Key words: Differentiation – Queen – Worker – Enzymes – SDS Electrophoresis –DNA– Ants INTRODUCTION Ants are social insects of the family Formicidae and, along with the related families of wasps and bees, belong to the order Hymenoptera. The highly organized colonies and nests of ants consist of millions of individuals. They are mostly sterile females (workers, soldiers, and other castes) with some fertile males (drones) and one or more fertile females (queens).Ants dominate most ecosystems, forming 15-20% of the terrestrial animal biomass .Their success has been attributed to their social structure, ability to modify their habitats, tap resources and defend themselves (Ant- Wikipedia ,the free encyclopedia).
    [Show full text]
  • NEW TRAMP ANT SPECIES for TURKEY: Tetramorium Lanuginosum Mayr (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE)
    http://dergipark.gov.tr/trkjnat Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 19(1): 51-54, 2018 ISSN 2147-0294, e-ISSN 2528-9691 Research Article DOI: 10.23902/trkjnat.340008 NEW TRAMP ANT SPECIES FOR TURKEY: Tetramorium lanuginosum Mayr (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) Celal KARAMAN*, Kadri KIRAN Trakya University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Balkan Campus, 22030, Edirne, TURKEY *Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] Cite this article as: Karaman C. & Kiran K. 2018. New Tramp Ant Species for Turkey: Tetramorium lanuginosum Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Trakya Univ J Nat Sci, 19(1): 51-54, DOI: 10.23902/trkjnat.346537 Received: 26 September 2017, Accepted: 11 January 2018, Online First: 17 January 2018, Published: 15 April 2018 Abstract: Human activities such as tourism, developed transportation and increased trade lead to the introduction of faunal elements into non-native habitats and consequently affect native fauna. These introduced species are called as non-native, exotic, invasive or tramp species. Here we record the well-known tramp species Tetramorium lanuginosum Mayr, for the first time from Turkey (Antalya-Alanya), and present first locality records for Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille) from Antalya- Alanya and Adana. Thus, the number of tramp ant species of Turkey is increased to 19. Key words: Tramp species, new record, Northeastern Mediterranean, Antalya-Alanya. Özet: Turizm, gelişmiş ulaşım ve artan ticaret gibi insan faaliyetleri faunal elemanların dağılım alanları dışındaki habitatlara taşınmasına neden olmakta ve dolayısıyla yerli faunayı etkilemektedir. Bu faaliyetlerle taşınan organizmalar yerli olmayan, egzotik, istilacı veya tramp türler olarak adlandırılır. Bu çalışmada, çok iyi bilinen tramp karınca türü olan Tetramorium lanuginosum Mayr’u Türkiye’den (Antalya-Alanya) ilk defa kayıt edilmekte ve Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille)’e ait ilk lokalite kayıtları ise Antalya-Alanya ve Adana’dan verilmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • African Butterfly News Can Be Downloaded Here
    LATE SUMMER EDITION: JANUARY / AFRICAN FEBRUARY 2018 - 1 BUTTERFLY THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA NEWS LATEST NEWS Welcome to the first newsletter of 2018! I trust you all have returned safely from your December break (assuming you had one!) and are getting into the swing of 2018? With few exceptions, 2017 was a very poor year butterfly-wise, at least in South Africa. The drought continues to have a very negative impact on our hobby, but here’s hoping that 2018 will be better! Braving the Great Karoo and Noorsveld (Mark Williams) In the first week of November 2017 Jeremy Dobson and I headed off south from Egoli, at the crack of dawn, for the ‘Harde Karoo’. (Is there a ‘Soft Karoo’?) We had a very flexible plan for the six-day trip, not even having booked any overnight accommodation. We figured that finding a place to commune with Uncle Morpheus every night would not be a problem because all the kids were at school. As it turned out we did not have to spend a night trying to kip in the Pajero – my snoring would have driven Jeremy nuts ... Friday 3 November The main purpose of the trip was to survey two quadrants for the Karoo BioGaps Project. One of these was on the farm Lushof, 10 km west of Loxton, and the other was Taaiboschkloof, about 50 km south-east of Loxton. The 1 000 km drive, via Kimberley, to Loxton was accompanied by hot and windy weather. The temperature hit 38 degrees and was 33 when the sun hit the horizon at 6 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Gambia (Western Africa)
    ANNALS OF THE UPPER SILESIAN MUSEUM IN BYTOM ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 26 (online 010): 1–13 ISSN 0867-1966, eISSN 2544-039X (online) Bytom, 08.05.2018 LECH BOROWIEC1, SEBASTIAN SALATA2 Notes on ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Gambia (Western Africa) http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1243767 1 Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Taxonomy, University of Wrocław, Przybyszewskiego 65, 51-148 Wrocław, Poland e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: A list of 35 ant species or morphospecies collected in Gambia is presented, 9 of them are recorded for the first time from the country:Camponotus cf. vividus, Crematogaster cf. aegyptiaca, Dorylus nigricans burmeisteri SHUCKARD, 1840, Lepisiota canescens (EMERY, 1897), Monomorium cf. opacum, Monomorium cf. salomonis, Nylanderia jaegerskioeldi (MAYR, 1904), Technomyrmex pallipes (SMITH, 1876), and Trichomyrmex abyssinicus (FOREL, 1894). A checklist of 82 ant species recorded from Gambia is given. Key words: ants, faunistics, Gambia, new country records. INTRODUCTION Ants fauna of Gambia (West Africa) is poorly known. Literature data, AntWeb and other Internet resources recorded only 59 species from this country. For comparison from Senegal, which surrounds three sides of Gambia, 89 species have been recorded so far. Both of these records seem poor when compared with 654 species known from the whole western Africa (SHUCKARD 1840, ANDRÉ 1889, EMERY 1892, MENOZZI 1926, SANTSCHI 1939, LUSH 2007, ANTWIKI 2017, ANTWEB 2017, DIAMÉ et al. 2017, TAYLOR 2018). Most records from Gambia come from general web checklists of species. Unfortunately, they lack locality data, date of sampling, collector name, coordinates of the locality and notes on habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutritional Ecology of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus Pennsylvanicus (De Geer): Macronutrient Preference and Particle Consumption
    Nutritional Ecology of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer): Macronutrient Preference and Particle Consumption Colleen A. Cannon Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology Richard D. Fell, Chairman Jeffrey R. Bloomquist Richard E. Keyel Charles Kugler Donald E. Mullins June 12, 1998 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: diet, feeding behavior, food, foraging, Formicidae Copyright 1998, Colleen A. Cannon Nutritional Ecology of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer): Macronutrient Preference and Particle Consumption Colleen A. Cannon (ABSTRACT) The nutritional ecology of the black carpenter ant, Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer) was investigated by examining macronutrient preference and particle consumption in foraging workers. The crops of foragers collected in the field were analyzed for macronutrient content at two-week intervals through the active season. Choice tests were conducted at similar intervals during the active season to determine preference within and between macronutrient groups. Isolated individuals and small social groups were fed fluorescent microspheres in the laboratory to establish the fate of particles ingested by workers of both castes. Under natural conditions, foragers chiefly collected carbohydrate and nitrogenous material. Carbohydrate predominated in the crop and consisted largely of simple sugars. A small amount of glycogen was present. Carbohydrate levels did not vary with time. Lipid levels in the crop were quite low. The level of nitrogen compounds in the crop was approximately half that of carbohydrate, and exhibited seasonal dependence. Peaks in nitrogen foraging occurred in June and September, months associated with the completion of brood rearing in Camponotus.
    [Show full text]
  • Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Bermuda
    212 Florida Entomologist 87(2) June 2004 ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) OF BERMUDA JAMES K. WETTERER1 AND ANDREA L. WETTERER2 1Wilkes Honors College, Florida Atlantic University, 5353 Parkside Drive, Jupiter, FL 33458 2Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 ABSTRACT For more than 50 years, two exotic ant species, Linepithema humile (Mayr) and Pheidole megacephala (F.), have been battling for ecological supremacy in Bermuda. Here we summa- rize known ant records from Bermuda, provide an update on the conflict between the domi- nant ant species, and evaluate the possible impact of the dominant species on the other ants in Bermuda. We examined ant specimens from Bermuda representing 20 species: Brachy- myrmex heeri Forel, B. obscurior Forel, Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer), Cardio- condyla emeryi Forel, C. obscurior Wheeler, Crematogaster sp., Hypoponera opaciceps (Mayr), H. punctatissima (Roger), L. humile, Monomorium monomorium Bolton, Odontomachus rug- inodis Smith, Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille), P. vividula (Nylander), P. megacephala, Plagiolepis alluaudi Forel, Solenopsis (Diplorhoptrum) sp., Tetramorium caldarium Roger, T. simillimum (Smith), Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger), and an undetermined Dacetini. Records for all but three (H. punctatissima, P. vividula, W. auropunctata) include specimens from 1987 or later. We found no specimens to confirm records of several other ant species, in- cluding Monomorium pharaonis (L.) and Tetramorium caespitum (L.). Currently, L. humile dominates most of Bermuda, while P. megacephala appear to be at its lowest population lev- els recorded. Though inconspicuous, B. obscurior is common and coexists with both dominant species. Paratrechina longicornis has conspicuous populations in two urban areas. Three other ant species are well established, but inconspicuous due to small size (B.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History and Foraging Behavior of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus Sericeiventris Guérin, 1838 (Formicinae, Campotonini) in the Brazilian Tropical Savanna
    acta ethol DOI 10.1007/s10211-008-0041-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Natural history and foraging behavior of the carpenter ant Camponotus sericeiventris Guérin, 1838 (Formicinae, Campotonini) in the Brazilian tropical savanna Marcela Yamamoto & Kleber Del-Claro Received: 15 October 2007 /Revised: 8 February 2008 /Accepted: 15 April 2008 # Springer-Verlag and ISPA 2008 Abstract Camponotus sericeiventris is a polymorphic ant Introduction living in populous colonies at tropical forests and cerrado formation. This study provides a detailed account of the The literature related to ants is abundant in examples natural history and foraging biology of C. sericeiventris in of taxonomy, diversity, ecology, and behavior (e.g., cerrado at Ecological Station of Panga, Southeast of Brazil. Hölldolbler and Wilson 1990), but still nowadays, more The nest distribution according to vegetation physiog- information about natural history and quantitative data nomies, activity rhythm, diet, and foraging patterns were on general characteristics of different species is needed described. Results showed that nests occur inside dead or to a better comprehension of several selective pressures live trunks, and also in branches of soft wood at cerradão observed in this taxa (e.g., Fourcassié and Oliveira 2002). and gallery forest physiognomies (approximately 1 nest/ Ants outnumber all other terrestrial organisms and occur 100m2), but not in the mesophytic forest. Ant activity is in virtually all types of habitats (Wheeler 1910), being its correlated with temperature and humidity. There is overlap dominance particularly conspicuous in the tropical region in the foraging area among neighbor colonies (as far as (Fittkau and Klinge 1973). The Brazilian tropical savanna, 28 m) without evidence of agonistic interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Type Specimens Deposited in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Austria) and a Preliminary Checklist
    Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 121 9–18 Wien, Februar 2019 Notes on the ant fauna of Eritrea (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae): type specimens deposited in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Austria) and a preliminary checklist M. Madl* Abstract The ant collection of the Natural History Museum Vienna (Austria) contains syntypes of nine species described from Eritrea: Aphaenogaster clavata EMERY, 1877 (= Pheidole clavata (EMERY, 1877)), Cam- ponotus carbo EMERY, 1877, Melissotarsus beccarii EMERY, 1877, Monomorium bicolor EMERY, 1877, Pheidole rugaticeps EMERY, 1877, Pheidole speculifera EMERY, 1877, Polyrhachis antinorii EMERY, 1877 (= Polyrhachis viscosa SMITH, 1858) and Tetramorium doriae EMERY, 1881. All syntypes were collected in Eritrea except the syntype of Monomorium luteum EMERY, 1881, which was collected in Yemen. A prelimi- nary checklist of the ants of Eritrea comprises 114 species and subspecies of seven subfamilies. Zusammenfassung In der Ameisensammlung des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien (Österreich) werden Syntypen von neun Arten aufbewahrt, die aus Eritrea beschrieben worden sind: Aphaenogaster clavata EMERY, 1877 [= Phei- dole clavata (EMERY, 1877)], Camponotus carbo EMERY, 1877, Melissotarsus beccarii EMERY, 1877, Mono- morium bicolor EMERY, 1877, Pheidole rugaticeps EMERY, 1877, Pheidole speculifera EMERY, 1877, Poly- rhachis antinorii EMERY, 1877 (= Polyrhachis viscosa SMITH, 1858) und Tetramorium doriae EMERY, 1881. Alle Syntypen stammen aus Eritrea ausgenommen der Syntypus von Monomorium luteum EMERY, 1881, der in Jemen gesammelt wurde. Eine vorläufige Artenliste der Ameisen Eritreas umfasst 114 Arten und Unterarten aus sieben Unterfamilien. Key words: Formicidae, types, Camponotus, Melissotarsus, Monomorium, Pheidole, Polyrhachis, Tetra- morium, checklist, Eritrea, Yemen. Introduction The study of the ant fauna of Eritrea has been neglected for several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Methods for the Study of Ants in Sugarcane Plantations in Southeastern Brazil
    Ants in sugarcane plantations in Southeastern Brazil 651 Field methods for the study of ants in sugarcane plantations in Southeastern Brazil Débora Rodrigues de Souza1; Erich Stingel2; Luiz Carlos de Almeida2; Marco Antônio Lazarini2; Catarina de Bortoli Munhae3; Odair Correa Bueno3; Claudinei Rogério Archangelo4; Maria Santina de C. Morini1* 1 UMC/NCA – Lab. de Mirmecologia, Av. Dr. Cândido Xavier de Almeida e Souza, 200 – 08701-970 – Mogi das Cruzes, SP – Brasil. 2 CTC, Fazenda Santo Antônio, s/n°, C.P. 162 – 13400-970 – Piracicaba, SP – Brasil. 3 UNESP/Centro de Estudos de Insetos Sociais, Av. 24, 1515 – 13506-725 – Rio Claro, SP – Brasil. 4 Usina Nova América S/A Agrícola – R. 11 de junho, 246 – 19800-020 – Assis, SP – Brasil. *Corresponding author <[email protected]> ABSTRACT: The harvest of sugarcane is still traditionally done manually with the burning of straw in most cultivated areas in Brazil. However, burning has been gradually eliminated with the relatively recent use of mechanical harvesting. This will result in significant changes in the agroecosystem, as the straw will remain in the field. No investigation on Formicidae found in sugarcane plantations in Southeastern Brazil harvested by this new system has been done yet. Because of their feeding habits, many species of this family may act as predators of several sugarcane pests. In this study, the sampling efficacy of pitfall traps, baits, and underground traps with two types of attractants were evaluated. Pitfall traps gave the largest richness, while abundance was the highest from baiting. Community composition and structure differed in relation to the sampling methods used.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brain of Cataglyphis Ants: Neuronal Organization and 2 Visual Projections 3
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.19.954461; this version posted February 19, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 The brain of Cataglyphis ants: neuronal organization and 2 visual projections 3 4 Jens Habenstein1*, Emad Amini2*, Kornelia Grübel1, Basil el Jundi1#, Wolfgang 5 Rössler1# 6 1 University of Würzburg, Biocenter, Behavioral Physiology and Sociobiology (Zoology II), Am 7 Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany 8 2 University of Würzburg, Biocenter, Neurobiology and Genetics, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, 9 Germany 10 11 *shared first authorship 12 #shared senior authorship 13 14 Abstract 15 Cataglyphis ants are known for their outstanding navigational abilities. They return to 16 their inconspicuous nest after far-reaching foraging trips using path integration, and 17 whenever available, learn and memorize visual features of panoramic sceneries. To 18 achieve this, the ants combine directional visual information from celestial cues and 19 panoramic scenes with distance information from an intrinsic odometer. The largely 20 vision-based navigation in Cataglyphis requires sophisticated neuronal networks to 21 process the broad repertoire of visual stimuli. Although Cataglyphis ants have been 22 subject to many neuroethological studies, little is known about the general neuronal 23 organization of their central brain and the visual pathways beyond major circuits. 24 Here, we provide a comprehensive, three-dimensional neuronal map of synapse-rich 25 neuropils in the brain of Cataglyphis nodus including major connecting fiber systems. 26 In addition, we examined neuronal tracts underlying the processing of visual 27 information in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Borowiec Et Al-2020 Ants – Phylogeny and Classification
    A Ants: Phylogeny and 1758 when the Swedish botanist Carl von Linné Classification published the tenth edition of his catalog of all plant and animal species known at the time. Marek L. Borowiec1, Corrie S. Moreau2 and Among the approximately 4,200 animals that he Christian Rabeling3 included were 17 species of ants. The succeeding 1University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA two and a half centuries have seen tremendous 2Departments of Entomology and Ecology & progress in the theory and practice of biological Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, classification. Here we provide a summary of the NY, USA current state of phylogenetic and systematic 3Social Insect Research Group, Arizona State research on the ants. University, Tempe, AZ, USA Ants Within the Hymenoptera Tree of Ants are the most ubiquitous and ecologically Life dominant insects on the face of our Earth. This is believed to be due in large part to the cooperation Ants belong to the order Hymenoptera, which also allowed by their sociality. At the time of writing, includes wasps and bees. ▶ Eusociality, or true about 13,500 ant species are described and sociality, evolved multiple times within the named, classified into 334 genera that make up order, with ants as by far the most widespread, 17 subfamilies (Fig. 1). This diversity makes the abundant, and species-rich lineage of eusocial ants the world’s by far the most speciose group of animals. Within the Hymenoptera, ants are part eusocial insects, but ants are not only diverse in of the ▶ Aculeata, the clade in which the ovipos- terms of numbers of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Distribution of Hymenoptera Aculeata in Midwestern Brazilian Dry Forests
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264895151 Diversity and Distribution of Hymenoptera Aculeata in Midwestern Brazilian Dry Forests Chapter · September 2014 CITATIONS READS 2 457 6 authors, including: Rogerio Silvestre Manoel F Demétrio UFGD - Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados UFGD - Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados 41 PUBLICATIONS 539 CITATIONS 8 PUBLICATIONS 27 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Bhrenno Trad Felipe Varussa de Oliveira Lima UFGD - Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados 4 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS 8 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Phylogeny and Biogeography of genus Eremnophila Menke, 1964 (HYMENOPTERA: Sphecidae) View project Functional diversity, phylogeny, ethology and biogeography of Hymenoptera in the chacoan subregion View project All content following this page was uploaded by Rogerio Silvestre on 28 November 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. 28 R. Silvestre, M. Fernando Demétrio, B. Maykon Trad et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH - PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL FACTORS DRY FORESTS ECOLOGY, SPECIES DIVERSITY AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT FRANCIS ELIOTT GREER EDITOR Copyright © 2014 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Diversity and Distribution of Hymenoptera Aculeata ... 29 In: Dry Forests ISBN: 978-1-63321-291-6 Editor: Francis Eliott Greer © 2014 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 2 DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTION
    [Show full text]