Developments on the Great Western Railway.” by ALFRED THOMAS BLACHALL,M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Developments on the Great Western Railway.” by ALFRED THOMAS BLACHALL,M Fry Z+. Fiq: 1. J n Fiq: 18. F. P. L. MA I N t <' i SECTION A A A PLAN POINT-RODJOINT. 2773.. F. P LA N. 4 F. P. L. -iL MAIN t-- Y ELEVATION A A. + SPRINGBALANCER AND LOCKINGBAR. RE L1 F E TELEGRAPHPOLE. M -----t MA1 N t- r- Fz'a: 6 . / +I 1 I L GOODS-LOOPINDICATOR. F7;q: 7. l + INDEPENDENTDISK. B-.. ROUTE-INDICATWR. PLATFORM LINE i MAINLINES t PLATFORM LINE BLOCK DIAGRAM A T. BLACKALL. Downloaded by [ University of Liverpool] on [15/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved. Proceedings.] BLACKALL ON RAILWAY-SIGNALLING. 153 28 February, 1911. ALEXANDERSIEMENS, President, in the Chair. (Paper No. 3931.) “ Railway-Signalling : Developments on the Great Western Railway.” By ALFRED THOMAS BLACHALL,M. Inst. C.E. THE Paper on railway-signals by the late Mr. R. C. Rapier, read at the Institution in 1874,’ described very fully the evolution of rail- way signalling up to that date, and Mr. A. M. Thompson’s Paper on the signalling of the London and North Western Railway, in 1885,2 showed advances madein railway signalling and interlocking during a later period. In the present communication it is proposed to refer to some further developments which have taken place in recent years upon the Great Western Railway, that being the line with which the Authoris connected and best acquainted. Although signalling and interlocking had longbeen an established feature of theGreat Western Railway, there were stillin 1889 many stations and junctions where the signalling was, according to modern ideas, very insufficient, and at which there was little or no attempt to concentrate or interlock the levers. The Regulation of Railways Act passed in that year gave power to the Board of Trade to require railway-companies to set their houses in order in various ways, and amongst the Orders made by the Board of Trade in virtue of thesepowers was onedated the 26thNovember, 1890, which required the Great Western Railway Company to adopt the block system on allits lines, with certain exceptions, andto provide for the interlocking of points and signals, also subject to certain exceptions. Although it was not found possible to comply with these require- mentswithin the actual times specified in the Order, they were fulfilled with all reasonable speed,and within a short time thewhole of the railway had been properly and efficiently signalled. As the Minutes of Proceedings Inst. C.E., vol. xxxviii, p. 142. * Zbid, vol. lxxxii, p. 166. Downloaded by [ University of Liverpool] on [15/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved. 154 BLACKALL ON RAILWAY-SIGNALLING. winutes of GreatWestern Railway had been extendingand improving its interlocking and signalling arrangements for many years, the effect of the Order was simply to expedite somewhat the completion of that work of signalling its line throughout which the company had already taken in hand, A few years ago, the company, having in mind that the signalling of its railway comprehended something more than the installation of semaphores, the connecting of rail-switches, and the interlocking of levers actuating them, andalso having in mind theextensive and increasing use of electrical appliances in signalling, decided that the co-ordination of the outdoor signalling and block signalling was a necessity ; it therefore placed the supervision of bothsignalling and telegrapharrangements under one control. It maybe of interest to recall that in the discussion on Mr. Thompson’s Paper, Mr. Spagnoletti, then Telegraph Superintendent of the Great Western Railway, advocated this course, and events have proved the correctness of his views. The Signalling Department controls the construction and maintenance of all signalling appliances, both mechanical and electrical, including telegraphs and telephones. The modern developments of signalling on the line arelargely in the direction of the increasinguse of electrical apparatusand appliances in connection with its outdoor signalling arrangements, andthe Author proposes, inter alia, to describe briefly some of these. IXTERLOCKINGFRAMES. For many years an interlocking frame designed by the Author’s predecessor (hisfather) was used, in which the interlocking of levers was carried out in a manner peculiar to the Great Western Railway ; but this form of interlocking could not be applied to conditional or special locking, and was suitable only forthe ordinary locking or releasing of onelever by another. For conditional- interlocking combinations tappet-locking had to be resorted to, and this led the Author to decide to use tappet-locking generally. With the exception of some smallerframes in which the interlocking between the levers is effected by means of what is known as stud- locking-which is reallyamodification of theother method- the tappet form of locking now generally employed on most rail- ways is used. ARRANGEMENTOF SIGNALS. It is of the greatest importance to place the signals so that they shall be easily readand understood by engine-drivers,and in Downloaded by [ University of Liverpool] on [15/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved. Proceedings.] BLACKALL ON RAILWAY-SIGNALLING. 155 Figs. 1-8, Plate 5, is shown the generalplan upon which the signalsare placed with this object in view. It will be seen that the general idea is to place each signal next to and upon the left- hand side of the line to which it applies, and to vary the height of thearms in accordance withthe importance of the lines. For instance, in Figs. 1 and 2 it will be noticed that the home signal at the facing points in each case has the arm for the main line higher than Lhe arm which applies to the branch, and to emphasize the distinction the former is placed upon the main post of the signal, while the arm for the branchis bracketed out. In Fig. 3, where the speed on both of the diverging lines would be the same, neither homesignal is upon the mainpost of the signal, but both are bracketed out to indicate the equal importance of the arms. In Fig. 4, where there is no branch line, but merely a turn-out to an avoiding line or siding, the principle of keeping the main-line arm on the straight post higher than that for the diverging line is again acted upon, and asthe loop line is comparatively unimportant thearm for it is kept lower than it wouldbe for an ordinary branch line, while it is also smaller. The signalling for parallel lines is shown in Fig. 5, where each signal is placed next to and upon the left-hand side of the line to which it applies. A junction at which fast running is on the straight road is shown in Fig. 6, where the speed is low on the branch line which goes off to the right, with a lower speed still upon the branch line going off tothe left, the arms upon the junctionsignal being varied in height accordingly. The signals for a " scissors " crossing in a station through which thereare four linesare illustrated inFig. 7. Theelevation will show how the signals are arranged to make them distinctive. No. 1 is the signal for the through line A, No. 2 is the signal leading from the through line A to the platform-line, No. 3 is the signal leading from the platform-line to the through line A, and No. 4 the signal for the straight platform-line. A double junction between parallel lines is given in Fig. 8, which shows the arrangement of the junction signals. The arrangement is on the same lines as in the othercases mentioned. It happens frequently thatit is not possible to arrange the signals as here described, owing to want of space between the lines, but it is very desirable in preparing plans for new lines or stations, and for other rearrangements of lay-out, to arrange the spaces between the lines so as to allow of the signals beingfixed in their properplaces. Downloaded by [ University of Liverpool] on [15/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved. 156 BLACKALL ON RAILWAY-SIGNALLING. [Minutes of Signals upon gantries spanning the lines are read very easily by drivers,and can beplaced actuallyover the lines to which they apply. The expense, however, of a signal-gantry is very consider- able, and is hardly to be justified unless its provision is absolutely unavoidable.The disposition of thepoints at very compliated stationsand junctions renders it impossible, inthe majority of cases, to group many signals upon one gantry so that they shall 011 be intheir right places, because it seldom happens that all the facingpoints and fouling points which the signals protect come immediately under the gantry. On this account very few gantries are provided upon the Great Western Railway. It was formerly the practice torepeat the home signals of a junction at the distant, that is to say, each home signal had its corresponding distant, but inview of the fact that atmany junctions there is fast running on one line only, and that a train diverging from the main route must reduce its speed considerably, it was felt to be bad practice to give the same indication upon approaching a junction to a driver who was required to reduce the speed of his trainto, say, 15 or 20 milesper houras to a driver whowas permittedto run through the junction at full speed. It is now customary, therefore, at junctions where there is fast running on one line only to provide but one distant signal, and this signal is capable of beinglowered only when the road is set for the fast- running line. The driver of a train which has to leave this line at the junction, and in consequence to reduce the speed of his train, passes the single distant at danger.This arrangement has the advantage of ensuring that the driver of the train which is required to slacken speed is checked at the distant signal, and it is also an economical arrangement.
Recommended publications
  • NSG 604 Indicators and Signs
    This is an uncontrolled copy. Before use, make sure that this is the current version by visiting www.railsafe.org.au/nsg NSG 604 signals and signs Indicators and signs General To describe the types of indicators and signs used in the Network. ............................................................................................... NOTE The Figures in this Rule show examples of the indicators and signs used in the Network. White or lunar white lights are shown in blue . ............................................................................................... Clearance posts Clearance posts may be located between two converging lines to show the clearance limit. Some clearance posts have: • a reflective background, or • a white light that must be illuminated at night or in conditions of low visibility. White reflective post forms Illuminated post form FIGURE 1: Examples of clearance posts ............................................................................................... NETWORK RULES MARCH 2019 V10.0 © SYDNEY TRAINS 2019 PAGE 1 OF 38 This is an uncontrolled copy. Before use, make sure that this is the current version by visiting www.railsafe.org.au/nsg NSG 604 signals and signs Indicators and signs Dead end lights Dead end lights are small red lights to indicate the end of dead end sidings. The lights display STOP indications only. If it is possible for a dead end light to be mistaken as a running signal at STOP, a white light above the red light is used to distinguish it from a running signal. FIGURE 2: Examples of dead end lights ............................................................................................... NETWORK RULES MARCH 2019 V10.0 © SYDNEY TRAINS 2019 PAGE 2 OF 38 This is an uncontrolled copy. Before use, make sure that this is the current version by visiting www.railsafe.org.au/nsg NSG 604 signals and signs Indicators and signs Guard’s indicator If it is possible for the signal at the exit-end of a platform to be obscured from a Guard’s view, a Guard’s indicator is placed over the platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Technologies Support to Railway Infrastructure and Operations
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 06, 2021 Communication Technologies Support to Railway Infrastructure and Operations Sniady, Aleksander Link to article, DOI: 10.11581/DTU:00000010 Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Sniady, A. (2015). Communication Technologies Support to Railway Infrastructure and Operations. DTU Fotonik. https://doi.org/10.11581/DTU:00000010 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Communication Technologies Support to Railway Infrastructure and Operations Aleksander Sniady Ph.D. Thesis May 2015 Communication Technologies Support to Railway Infrastructure and Operations Aleksander Sniady´ Ph.D. Thesis Networks Technology & Service Platforms DTU Fotonik Technical University of Denmark May 2015 To my parents and grandparents. Supervisors: José Soler Lars Dittmann Technical University of Denmark DTU Fotonik Department of Photonics Engineering This thesis is a part of RobustRailS project, Ørsteds Plads, Building 343, which is funded by The Danish Council for 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark Strategic Research.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dccconcepts “Modelling Advice” Publication
    A DCCconcepts “Modelling advice” publication DCC Advice #11 Page 1 Wiring Point-work & Special track conditions for DC or DCC Wiring the track… In plain English, with diagrams! If we had a $ or £ or € for every time we’ve been asked how to wire track and point-work, we’d be writing this on a beach somewhere while sipping a cold beer! A great layout needs good trackwork, so first - a word about trackwork and getting good performance. Choose carefully! DO think about making your own turnouts if you have even moderate skills. It is not as hard as you think, needs only basic skills and tools... and we do our best to make it easy with our top quality gauges, trackwork frets and templates. PLUS we will soon provide a detailed “How to make track” tutorial too. Interested? Then call or email us and we will do our best to help you. No matter what scale you will model in, DO NOT even consider using insulated frogs! Yes, lazy retailers who do not understand what they sell - and modellers who have never done a proper job of laying track so it runs well may well recommend it to you… but do NOT be tempted. No matter which brand makes the turnouts, if you use insulated frogs, you WILL have small locos stalling or also suffer from wider wheels bridging the frog tip and creating momentary shorts that are hard to fix and really are a source of constant frustration. Use more realistic rail sizes please: Usually this will be code 55 in N, or Code 75 and 83 in OO or HO Scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix J Haddington Branch Line Survey
    Appendix J Haddington Branch Line Survey AllanRail East Lothian Access STAG Physical feasibility of re-opening the Haddington Rail Branch Line Background The reopening of the Haddington Railway branch line from the East Coast Main Line (ECML) at Longniddry to Haddington is one of the options that are required to be considered in the East Lothian Access STAG. This initial report informs the appraisal work of the feasibility of re-opening the railway, some of the issues and problems that would need to be resolved, choices that are available and suggests an order of magnitude cost. Because the rest of the railway is electrified it is assumed that the Haddington branch will also be equipped with standard 25Kv overhead electrification equipment. The report is based on a physical site walk-over on 21 February 2019, carried out by David Prescott of AllanRail who has considerable experience in the initial development of re-opened railways in Scotland including walk-overs on the Stirling – Alloa – Kincardine, Airdrie- Bathgate and Borders Railway routes in the inception and pre-construction stages. This is not an engineering assessment, but an initial view based on observation and experience. The route is considered in the Longniddry to Haddington direction and the report is broken down into key route sections. Connecting to the ECML The ideal connection to the main line has several desirable operating and engineering requirements: · It should be on the Edinburgh side of Longniddry to minimise the occupation of the ECML; · It should provide as
    [Show full text]
  • BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:14 Page 1
    BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:14 Page 1 BRITAIN‘S LEADING HISTORICAL RAILWAY JOURNAL VOLUME 22 • NUMBER 1 • JANUARY 2008 • £3.60 IN THIS ISSUE 150 YEARS OF THE SOMERSET & DORSET RAILWAY GWR RAILCARS IN COLOUR THE NORTH CORNWALL LINE THE FURNESS LINE IN COLOUR PENDRAGON BRITISH ENGLISH-ELECTRIC MANUFACTURERS PUBLISHING THE GWR EXPRESS 4-4-0 CLASSES THE COMPREHENSIVE VOICE OF RAILWAY HISTORY BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 15:59 Page 64 THE COMPREHENSIVE VOICE OF RAILWAY HISTORY END OF THE YEAR AT ASHBY JUNCTION A light snowfall lends a crisp feel to this view at Ashby Junction, just north of Nuneaton, on 29th December 1962. Two LMS 4-6-0s, Class 5 No.45058 piloting ‘Jubilee’ No.45592 Indore, whisk the late-running Heysham–London Euston ‘Ulster Express’ past the signal box in a flurry of steam, while 8F 2-8-0 No.48349 waits to bring a freight off the Ashby & Nuneaton line. As the year draws to a close, steam can ponder upon the inexorable march south of the West Coast Main Line electrification. (Tommy Tomalin) PENDRAGON PUBLISHING www.pendragonpublishing.co.uk BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:17 Page 4 SOUTHERN GONE WEST A busy scene at Halwill Junction on 31st August 1964. BR Class 4 4-6-0 No.75022 is approaching with the 8.48am from Padstow, THE NORTH CORNWALL while Class 4 2-6-4T No.80037 waits to shape of the ancient Bodmin & Wadebridge proceed with the 10.00 Okehampton–Padstow.
    [Show full text]
  • Anesthesia CODE DESCRIPTION QTY 02-03-00001 N2 O +O2
    Anesthesia CODE DESCRIPTION QTY 02-03-00001 N2 O +O2 measuring apparatus 90 02-03-00002 ICU Ventilator 1,875 02-03-00003 Multi parameter monitor + capnograph 2,742 02-03-00004 Multi parameter monitor 1,674 02-03-00005 Anesthesia machine 933 02-03-00006 Ventilator 579 02-03-00007 Pediatric ventilator . 1,608 02-03-00008 Whirling hygrometer ,(5-50 C ) with measurement 129 ruler . 02-03-00009 Portable oxygen indicator 15 02-03-00010 Blood oximeter estimation unit with accessories and 15 spare parts 02-03-00011 Warmer humidifier for O2 outlet 300 02-03-00012 Anesthesia Ventilator 1,353 02-03-00013 Oxymeter (S-100 pulse oxymeter-ser, No. S0720 class 120 I type BF 02-03-00014 Cartridge for pressure monitoring :- a-mod. No. 7370 108 257 E2258 ser, No.011164 580 02-03-00015 b-mod. No. 7370 109 E2255 ser, No.1006412580 108 02-03-00016 Portable ventilators 1,101 02-03-00017 Pulse oximeter 1,500 02-03-00018 Respiratory humidifier 36 02-03-00019 Pressure recording machin 21 02-03-00020 Oxymeter 51 02-03-00021 Central oxygen flowmeter 200 02-03-00022 Puls Oxymeter : rechargable , portable , finger 100 sensor . 02-03-00023 Resuscitators (a-Good illumination , preferably 204 double light , b-Heater , preferably double light , c-Timer , d-O2 supply , e-Good support for the baby ,to prevent accident & falling down , f-Suitable for all pediatric age groups , g-Pressure transducer.) 02-03-00024 O2 Humedifier The head for fixing the bottle 200 containing the water is preferabley of special metalic material to prevent damage during fixing.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Portishead to Portbury Dock Junction Overview 17 9
    Ref: GS2/140569 Version: 1.00 Date: July 2014 Contents 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 3 3. Business Objective 6 4. Business Case 9 5. Project Scope 11 6. Deliverables 12 7. Options Considered 13 8. Portishead to Portbury Dock Junction Overview 17 9. Engineering Options 19 10. Bathampton Turnback 52 11. Constructability and Access Strategy 53 12. Cost Estimates 56 13. Project Risks and Assumptions 57 14. High level business case appraisal against whole life costings 58 15. Project Schedule 59 16. Capacity/Route Runner Modelling 60 17. Interface with other Projects 61 18. Impact on Existing Customers, Operators and Maintenance Practice 62 19. Consents Strategy 63 20. Environmental Appraisal 64 21. Common Safety Method for Risk Evaluation Assessment (CSM) 65 22. Contracting Strategy 66 23. Concept Design Deliverables 67 24. Conclusion and Recommendations 68 References 70 Formal Acceptance of Selected Option by Client, Funders and Stakeholders 71 GRIP Stage 2 Governance for Railway Investment Projects Ref: GS2/140569 Version: 1.00 Date: July 2014 Appendices A Drawings B Cost Estimate C Qualitative Cost Risk Analysis D Capacity Modelling E Environmental Appraisal F Signalling Appraisal G Photograph Gallery H Track Bed Investigation (Factual, Interpretative and Hazardous Classification) I Visualisations (Galingaleway and Sheepway Gate Farm) J Interdisciplinary Design Certificate K Portishead Station Options Appraisal Report (produced by North Somerset Council) GRIP Stage 2 Governance for Railway Investment Projects Ref: GS2/140569 Version: 1.00 Date: July 2014 Issue Record Issue No Brief History Of Amendment Date of Issue 0.01 First Draft 30 May 2014 0.02 Second Draft updated to include comments 13 June 2014 1.00 Report Issued 18 July 2014 Distribution List Name Organisation Issue No.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Registry Registrar's Periodical Template
    Service Alberta ____________________ Corporate Registry ____________________ Registrar’s Periodical REGISTRAR’S PERIODICAL, JULY 15, 2013 SERVICE ALBERTA Corporate Registrations, Incorporations, and Continuations (Business Corporations Act, Cemetery Companies Act, Companies Act, Cooperatives Act, Credit Union Act, Loan and Trust Corporations Act, Religious Societies’ Land Act, Rural Utilities Act, Societies Act, Partnership Act) 0771829 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 1751521 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Registered 2013 JUN 06 Registered Address: 1700, Corporation Incorporated 2013 JUN 07 Registered 10235 - 101 STREET, EDMONTON ALBERTA, Address: 1 WILDROSE DRIVE, SYLVAN LAKE T5J3G1. No: 2117535068. ALBERTA, T4S 1G4. No: 2017515210. 0928242 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 1751581 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Registered 2013 JUN 07 Registered Address: 107 - 5120 Corporation Incorporated 2013 JUN 05 Registered 47 STREET NE , CALGARY ALBERTA, T3J4K3. No: Address: 120, 1210-8TH STREET S.W., CALGARY 2117535852. ALBERTA, T2R 1L3. No: 2017515814. 0972381 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 1751582 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Registered 2013 JUN 14 Registered Address: 349 Corporation Incorporated 2013 JUN 05 Registered HILLCREST DRIVE, FT. MCMURRAY ALBERTA, Address: 2120 SPARROW DRIVE BOX 236, T9H3X3. No: 2117550901. CALGARY ALBERTA, T9E 8A2. No: 2017515822. 101202064 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other 1751584 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2013 JUN 10 Corporation Incorporated 2013 JUN 06 Registered Registered Address: 5018 50 AVE, LLOYDMINSTER Address: 4020- 26TH AVENUE SW, CALGARY ALBERTA, T9V0W7. No: 2117540829. ALBERTA, T3E 0P2. No: 2017515848. 1133 PRODUCTIONS INC Named Alberta Corporation 1751586 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Incorporated 2013 JUN 06 Registered Address: 16 Corporation Incorporated 2013 JUN 06 Registered BUTTE PLACE NW, CALGARY ALBERTA, T2L Address: #20, 5660- 10TH STREET NE, CALGARY 1P2.
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable D3.1 Virtual Coupling Communication Solutions Analysis
    Ref. Ares(2020)7880497 - 22/12/2020 Deliverable D3.1 Virtual Coupling Communication Solutions Analysis Project Acronym: MOVINGRAIL Starting Date: 01/12/2018 Duration (Months): 25 Call (part) Identifier: H2020-S2R-OC-IP2-2018 Grant Agreement No.: 826347 Due Date of Deliverable: Month 10 Actual Submission Date: 25-09-2020 Responsible/Author: Bill Redfern (PARK) Dissemination Level: Public Status: Issued Reviewed: No G A 8 2 6 3 4 7 P a g e 1 | 63 Document history Revision Date Description 0.1 03-07-2020 First draft for comments and internal review 0.2 24-09-2020 Second draft 1.0 25-09-2020 Issued 1.1 22-12-2020 Update following comments from the Commission, added new section 4.2.1 Report contributors Name Beneficiary Details of contribution Short Name John Chaddock PARK Primary Curation. Identification and collation of source documentation. Document review. Bill Redfern PARK Literature review and solutions research. Requirements identification. Analysis of requirements and potential solutions. Descriptions and conclusions. John Marsden PARK Literature review and solutions research. Michael Duffy PARK Literature review and solutions research. Mark Cooper PARK Literature review and solutions research. Analysis. Format/editing. Andrew Wright PARK Document review. Lei Chen UoB Document review. Mohamed Samra UoB Document review. Paul van Koningsbruggen Technolution Document review. Rob Goverde TUD Document review, quality check and final editing. Funding This project has received funding from the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 826347. The JU receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the Shift2Rail JU members other than the Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian TETRA Forum
    TETRA & CRITICAL COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION Study on the relative merits of TETRA, LTE and other broadband technologies for critical communications markets Final version 1.1: February 2015 P3 communications GmbH Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3 (Alter Schlachthof) 52070 Aachen Germany www.p3-group.com/en/communications-gmbh-46867.html Version 1.1 P3 communications GmbH February 2015 Page 1 of 29 TCCA study on TETRA, LTE and other broadband technologies for critical communications markets Table of contents 1 Executive summary .............................................................................................. 4 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Background .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Study objectives ............................................................................................ 8 2.3 Scope ........................................................................................................... 8 3 The Critical Communications market by sector ...................................................10 3.1 PPDR / Public Safety ...................................................................................10 3.2 Transport .....................................................................................................10 3.3 Utilities .........................................................................................................12 3.4 Industrial
    [Show full text]
  • Level Crossings: a Guide for Managers, Designers and Operators Railway Safety Publication 7
    Level Crossings: A guide for managers, designers and operators Railway Safety Publication 7 December 2011 Contents Foreword 4 What is the purpose of this guide? 4 Who is this guide for? 4 Introduction 5 Why is managing level crossing risk important? 5 What is ORR’s policy on level crossings? 5 1. The legal framework 6 Overview 6 Highways and planning law 7 2. Managing risks at level crossings 9 Introduction 9 Level crossing types – basic protection and warning arrangements 12 General guidance 15 Gated crossings operated by railway staff 16 Barrier crossings operated by railway staff 17 Barrier crossings with obstacle detection 19 Automatic half barrier crossings (AHBC) 21 Automatic barrier crossings locally monitored (ABCL) 23 Automatic open crossings locally monitored (AOCL) 25 Open crossings 28 User worked crossings (UWCs) for vehicles 29 Footpath and bridleway crossings 30 Foot crossings at stations 32 Provision for pedestrians at public vehicular crossings 32 Additional measures to protect against trespass 35 The crossing 36 Gates, wicket gates and barrier equipment 39 Telephones and telephone signs 41 Miniature stop lights (MSL) 43 Traffic signals, traffic signs and road markings 44 3. Level crossing order submissions 61 Overview and introduction 61 Office of Rail Regulation | December 2011 | Level crossings: a guide for managers, designers and operators 2 Background and other information on level crossing management 61 Level crossing orders: scope, content and format 62 Level crossing order request and consideration process 64 Information
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Level Crossings 4
    RSC-G-006-B Guidelines For The Design Of Section 5 Railway Infrastructure And Rolling Stock LEVEL CROSSINGS 5 LEVEL CROSSINGS 4 5.1. THE PRINCIPLES 4 5.2. GENERAL GUIDANCE 5 5.2.1. General description 5 5.2.2. Structure of the guidance 5 5.2.3. Positioning of level crossings 5 5.2.4. Equipment at level crossings 5 5.2.5. Effects on existing level crossings 6 5.2.6. Operating conditions 6 5.3. TYPES OF CROSSINGS 7 5.3.1. Types of crossing 7 5.3.2. Conditions for suitability 9 5.4. GATED CROSSINGS OPERATED BY RAILWAY STAFF 12 5.4.1. General description (for user worked gates see section 5.8) 12 5.4.2. Method of operation 12 5.4.3. Railway signalling and control 12 5.5. BARRIER CROSSINGS OPERATED BY RAILWAY STAFF (MB) 13 5.5.1. General description 13 5.5.2. Method of operation 13 5.5.3. Railway signalling and control 14 5.6. AUTOMATIC HALF BARRIER CROSSINGS (AHB) 15 5.6.1. General description 15 5.6.2. Method of operation 15 5.6.3. Railway signalling and control 16 5.7. AUTOMATIC OPEN CROSSING (AOC) 17 5.7.1. General description 17 5.7.2. Method of operation 17 5.7.3. Railway signalling and control 18 5.8. USER-WORKED CROSSINGS (UWC) WITH GATES OR LIFTING BARRIERS 19 5.8.1. General description 19 5.8.2. Method of operation 19 5.9. PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS (PC) PRIVATE OR PUBLIC FOOTPATH 21 5.9.1.
    [Show full text]