Pollen Harvest by Sonoran Native Bees and Flowering

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pollen Harvest by Sonoran Native Bees and Flowering Pollen Harvest by Sonoran Desert Honey Bees: Conservation Implications for Native Bees and Flowering Plants Item Type Article Authors Buchmann, Steven L.; Shipman, Charles W. Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 08/10/2021 03:05:24 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554244 Pollen HarvestBuchmann and Shipman 3 on its host plants, it would have been available for transport by co- adapted insect, bird and bat pollinators which are of- ten better at depositing viable pollen, effecting subsequent fertilization, fruit and seed set on native flowering plants. Sonoran Desert bees are predominantly specialist feeders Pollen Harvest by Sonoran and depend upon certain plants more than honey bees which can switch hosts at will and have a highly mixed diet. Thus, Desert Honey Bees: in direct competition with these alien social bees living in Conservation Implications forlarge colonies, native desert bees are often at a disadvantage in acquiring pollen and producing replacement offspring. Native Bees and FloweringDesert flowering plants, especially rare, threatened and en- Plants dangered species are also adversely affected since honey bees remove most of the pollen and often are responsible for setting fewer seeds or dispersing pollen at different distances than their original pollinators once did. Introduction Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) live in eusocial matriarchal colonies usually founded and headed by one long -lived queen. Because of their ability to produce a new queen from Stephen L. Buchmann a young fertilized egg of the previous queen, the process USDA -ARS Carl Hayden Bee Research Center known as reproductive swarming, colonies may persist for 2000 East Allen Road many years. A single colony, living in deciduous forests in Tucson, Arizona 85719 New York state, has been estimated to have an average lon- gevity of 5.6 years (Seeley, 1986). Mature colonies are com- Charles W. Shipman prised of 20,000 to 60,000 individuals, of which at any time Arizona -Sonora Desert Museum there may be a few thousand drone bees (males) present. 2021 North Kinney Road The collective biomass of the adult bees in such a hypotheti- Tucson, Arizona 85743 -8918 cal colony may be from one to six kg. In one year, during 10 to 15 brood -rearing cycles, the colony may produce a total of 150,000 to 250,000 individuals. The food consumed by the "superorganism" colony in one year's time is staggering. A colony may easily collect and collectively ingest as much as 20 to 50 kg of pollen (the floral equivalent of tens of millions Abstract of flowers), 40 -60 kg of stored honey and perhaps 0.1 kg of Managed and feral honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) har-plant resins, saps and gums, known to beekeepers and herbal vest immense quantities of nectar and pollen within kilome- medicine practicioners as propolis. To amass such floral re- ters of their nests whether they live in relatively undisturbed sources the bees may have made as many as 1.3 to 2.0 million or agricultural habitats. Within the Sonoran Desert of south-trips for pollen and perhaps three million foraging sorties in ern Arizona, pollen collection by European honey bee colo-search of nectar (Seeley, 1986; Buchmann, unpubl.). During nies was monitored by the use of apicultural pollen traps.its first year of life a new bee colony will produce approxi- Managed colonies near Tucson, Arizona routinely collectedmately 9,900 cm' of comb area containing about 4,100 double - from 20 to 50 kg of pollen each year. Flowering pulses (phe-sided hexagonal cells in which to raise their larvae along nology) in the local flora was closely tracked by the colonies,with storing pollen and floral nectar, processed into honey. and pollen influx into their nests usually occurred as three to four distinct seasonal peaks, although some pollen was ac-Only four resources - pollen, nectar, water and plant resins tively harvested during 48 or more weeks every year. The - are required by the honey bee colony to support all life range of flowers visited for pollen by the honey bee is likelyfunctions. Floral and extrafloral- derived nectar contains sug- the most diverse for any social or solitary bee yet studied, ars (mainly sucrose, glucose and fructose) which are the en- largely due to their massive food requirements, efficient scout-ergy -rich nutrients necessary for individual metabolism, part ing and recruitment to ephemeral flower patches, and persis- of the larval diet, a thermoregulatory and flight "fuel ", and tence of their colonies as perennial units for many years. Atthe material hoarded, as honey, in capped combs to support most Sonoran Desert sites, honey bee colonies took pollenlife during periods of extranidal nectar dearths or over the from at least 12 and as many as 40 -50 dominant angiospermlong cold confinement during winter. Pollen, the collective taxa. Additionally, pollen diet breadth of feral honey bee colo- term for the individual sperm cell- containing male gameto- nies was determined microscopically from blackened below - phytes of angiospermous plants provides the major dietary nest refuse deposits known as bee middens. One such de-source of proteins, amino acids, lipids, minerals, vitamins posit from the Arizona -Mexico borderlands is thought to rep- and other essential nutrients for larval growth and adult resent more than a half century of accumulated materials.physiological maintenance. Honey bees are dominant invertebrate herbivores in desert regions taking pollen and nectar in massive amounts from atA honey bee colony can thus be visualized as a highly spe- least 25 percent of the local flora. Had this pollen remained cialized foraging "machine" able to locate through the initia- 4 Desert Plants1996 tive of scout bees and their recruits, the richest floral patches delimited by using palynological methods (O'Rourke and for pollen and nectar, and rapidly and efficiently communi- Buchmann, 1991) to assess residual pollen in old brood cate these discoveries. These resources are exploited usingcombs, honey, propolis, or debris middens below feral colo- olfactory and the so- called "dance language" communica-nies. Honey bee colonies are ideally suited to this type of tion. Individual foragers are essentially constant to one plant"forensic palynology" since their nests are virtual "sinks" species during a foraging trip, but over time are directed, or for ingested pollen grains which can be sampled quantita- locate on their own, better or newly available flowers. Thistively. Probably the best single source of multiyear pollen shifting of bees from poorer floral resources to better floralplant dietary records are several year old, darkened brood patches has been termed the "information- center foragingcombs. These contain a representative subsample of all the strategy" (Seeley, 1995). pollen grains found in the larval feces (meconia). These ma- terials become "fossilized" in strata within the cell bases of Mature colonies, with 40,000 adult workers for example, mayold brood comb as the colony ages. Further, pollen contribu- have from 10,000 to 20,000 or more foragers actively engagedtions from nectar- producing plants can be separated from in daily flights to collect pollen, nectar, water and resin. Flightpollen plant records through the use of melissopalynology distances by honey bee workers in natural ecosystems havewhereby pollen grains left in stored honey reveal which an- been little studied, but indications for Apis mellifera colo-giosperm species were visited for nectar. nies living in New York forests are that 99 percent of all flights are to flowers less than eight km from the nest, with almost 90During the mid 1980's the author made a surprising discov- percent of the colony's foraging effort taking place withinery in shallow mountain caves within the Organ Pipe Cactus four km (Visscher and Seeley, 1982). National Monument on the Arizona/Mexico border. Large deposits of blackened asphalt -like waxy materials were found Calculations of the effective total area foraged, averaged overbelow extant and old dead feral honey bee colonies. Upon a season or during one year and estimated as concentricexamination, these deposits were found to contain honey circular foraging bands, indicate an immense floral landscape bee corpses, beeswax, corbicular pollen loads, cocoons, bee controlled by even one honey bee colony. Roubik (1989)parts and larval feces along with unidentified materials. I've estimated that a single Africanized honey bee (Apis mellifera called these "debris middens" and they hold great poten- scutellata) colony may forage from an area of 100 or evential-as palynological samples- to infer the vegetation of 300 km2 in Panamanian rainforests. In the Sonoran Desert ofthe surrounding area along with information on honey bee Arizona, colonies appear to forage within an area estimatedpollen diet breadth. Unlike packrat middens (indurated de- to be 80 -100 km2 in extent (Southwick and Buchmann, unpubl; posits from white -throated packrats and other species in the Southwick and Buchmann, 1995). area), the honey bees travel great distances from their nests giving a more regional vegetative reconstruction than pos- Honey Bee Colonies as Biological and Chemical Monitoring Units sible with the rodent middens. If such middens are present in With their remarkable foraging abilities, it is surprising toAfrica in dry caves, produced belowApis mellifera scutellata learn that honey bees have been underutilized as "biological colonies, they may hold invaluable information for future monitoring agents" for the study (on an hourly, daily, sea-paleocologists who find and exploit their pollen -rich infor- sonal, annual and multiyear basis) of events occurring within mation. environments found inside their immense foraging domains. It is common for beekeepers to be aware of honey yields perBy using such palynological sampling and analysis tech- hive when apiaries are established in different plant commu-niques, it is possible to reconstruct major and minor bloom- nities.
Recommended publications
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Gap Ranch Biological Resource Evaluation
    RED GAP RANCH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE EVALUATION Prepared for: Southwest Ground-water Consultants, Inc. Prepared by: WestLand Resources, Inc. Date: February 14, 2014 Project No.: 1822.01 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................ 1 2. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................... 2 2.1. Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Physical Environment ................................................................................................................... 2 2.3. Biological Environment and Resources ....................................................................................... 3 3. SCREENING ANALYSIS FOR SPECIES OF CONCERN ................................................................ 5 3.1. Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2. Screening Analysis Results .......................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1. USFWS-listed Species ...................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2. USFS Coconino National Forest Sensitive Species ........................................................ 15 3.2.3. USFS Management Indicator Species ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Page 55 of Þÿ GAGEAGRANATELIICONTRI BU B IILACUNOA
    Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest. 2018, 45: 47-55 EUPHORBIA GENUS IN BOTANICAL GARDEN IASSY – FEATURES OF LIVING PLANT COLLECTION IFRIM Camelia 1* Abstract: The Euphorbia genus collection from the Botanical Garden of Iassy comprises 28 taxa, of which 18 are originated in the dry areas of South Africa. Most of the South- African species have conservative value, belonging to different sozological categories, at national or international level. The experience of cultivating items from the collection led to the establishment of characteristics concerning cultivation particularities, which are useful for horticultural purposes. The morphological studies of the plants cultivated in GBI greenhouses put together with information from specialty literature have permitted the development of an artificial key, useful in determining species from the collection. Key words: Euphorbia genus, Botanical Garden Iassy, artificial taxonomic key Received 30 September 2018 Accepted 15 November 2018 Introduction The Euphorbia genus is considered the second richest in the angiosperms group, the number of circumscribed species are appreciated at approximately 2000 (Berry et al. 2016) or even 2250 (Esser 2009). The genus has a cosmopolitan distribution (except Antarctica), the majority of the species occurs in tropical and subtropical Africa and America. The habitats occupied by species are very diverse, from forest steppe to arid areas; biological forms are very diverse as well, from herbaceous annual plants to trees with impressive dimensions. Characteristic for this polyphyletic genus is the inflorescence structure, named cyathium; likewise spurges are recognized for their irritant latex (Carter & Leach 2001). The genus’ name seems to have come from the name Euphorbus (Euphorbos) of the Greek physician of Juba (Iuba) II, king of Mauritania (a Berber kingdom that was part of present-day western Algeria and northern Morocco) from first century AD (Smith 1849).
    [Show full text]
  • Pima County Is Included in Appendix B
    The lesser long-nosed bat is found during the summer within desert grasslands and scrublands. The lesser long-nosed bat spends the day in caves and tunnels and forages at night upon plant nectar and pollen. This bat is an important pollinator of agave, and organ pipe and saguaro cacti (AGFD 2003). Roosting occurs in caves, abandoned buildings, and mines, which are usually located at the base of mountains where food sources are present (AGFD 2003). The lesser long-nosed bat is a seasonal resident of the OPCNM. Roosting sites are located in the OPCNM, but no known roosting sites occur within the project corridor (NPS 2003). The closest location of a known maternity colony to the project corridor would be approximately 15 miles (NPS 2003). 3.6.1.3 Acuña Cactus The candidate status of Acuña cactus was last reviewed on May 11, 2005 (70 FR 24870). Seven populations of Acuña cactus are currently known to exist (Baiza 2007). The species is restricted to well drained knolls and gravel ridges between major washes on substrates, including granite hills and flats and bright red to white andesite, occurring from 1,300 to 2,000 feet in elevation (AGFD 2004). The species requires insect vectors for pollination, with polylectic bee species being the primary agent (AGFD 2004). Dispersal occurs primarily through gravity, and secondarily by wind, rain, and small insects. As a candidate species, the Acuña cactus is not Federally protected, but is protected by the Arizona’s Native Plant Law. Consideration is given to candidate species because of the potential for their listing during project activities, which could require USFWS Section 7 consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Notices of Final Rulemaking NOTICES of FINAL RULEMAKING
    Arizona Administrative Register / Secretary of State Notices of Final Rulemaking NOTICES OF FINAL RULEMAKING The Administrative Procedure Act requires the publication of the final rules of the state’s agencies. Final rules are those which have appeared in the Register first as proposed rules and have been through the formal rulemaking process including approval by the Gover- nor’s Regulatory Review Council or the Attorney General. The Secretary of State shall publish the notice along with the Preamble and the full text in the next available issue of the Register after the final rules have been submitted for filing and publication. NOTICE OF FINAL RULEMAKING TITLE 3. AGRICULTURE CHAPTER 3. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION [R08-69] PREAMBLE 1. Sections Affected Rulemaking Action Table 1 Amend R3-3-1101 Amend R3-3-1102 Amend R3-3-1103 Amend R3-3-1104 Amend R3-3-1105 Amend R3-3-1106 Amend R3-3-1107 Amend R3-3-1108 Amend R3-3-1109 Amend R3-3-1110 Amend R3-3-1111 Repeal Appendix A Amend 2. The statutory authority for the rulemaking, including both the authorizing statute (general) and the statutes the rules are implementing (specific): Authorizing statute: A.R.S. §§ 3-107(A)(1), 41-1073 Implementing statutes: A.R.S. §§ 3-903(B), 3-904(C), 3-905(C), 3-906(D), 3-908(E), 3-910(B), 3-911(C), 3-912, and 3-913 3. The effective date of the rules May 3, 2008 4. A list of all previous notices appearing in the Register addressing the final rules: Notice of Rulemaking Docket Opening: 13 A.A.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora in Southwestern Arizona
    Felger, R.S., S. Rutman, J. Malusa, and M.A. Baker. 2014. Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: A flora in southwestern Arizona. Part 7. Eudicots: Cactaceae – Cactus Family. Phytoneuron 2014-69: 1–95. Published 1 July 2014. ISSN 2153 733X AJO PEAK TO TINAJAS ALTAS: A FLORA IN SOUTHWESTERN ARIZONA. PART 7. EUDICOTS: CACTACEAE – CACTUS FAMILY RICHARD STEPHEN FELGER Herbarium, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 [email protected] & Sky Island Alliance P.O. Box 41165 Tucson, Arizona 85717 *Author for correspondence: [email protected] SUSAN RUTMAN 90 West 10th Street Ajo, Arizona 85321 JIM MALUSA School of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 [email protected] MARC A. BAKER College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, School of Life Sciences Arizona State University Main Campus, P.O. Box 874501 Tempe, Arizona 85287-4501 [email protected] ABSTRACT A floristic account is provided for the cactus family as part of the vascular plant flora of the contiguous protected areas of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, and the Tinajas Altas Region in the heart of the Sonoran Desert in southwestern Arizona. The modern native cactus flora includes 35 taxa in 12 genera, plus 2 non-native prickly- pears that are not established in the flora area. The overall cactus flora including fossils and non- natives totals 39 taxa in 13 genera: at least 17 taxa are represented by fossils recovered from packrat middens, two of which are no longer present in the flora area. This account includes selected synonyms, English, Spanish, and O’odham common names in when available, identification keys, brief descriptions, images, local and general distributional, natural history, and ethnobotanical information.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Vascular Plants of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument 10/6/2008
    Checklist of Vascular Plants of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument 10/6/2008 USDA Family Scientific Name English common name PLANTS code Acanthaceae Anisacanthus thurberi (Torrey) A. Gray Desert honeysuckle ANTH2 Acanthaceae Carlowrightia arizonica A. Gray CAAR7 Acanthaceae Dicliptera resupinata (Vahl) de Jussieu DIRE4 Acanthaceae Justicia californica (Bentham) D.N. Gibson Chuparosa JUCA8 Acanthaceae Justicia candicans (Nees) L.D. Benson JUCA9 Acanthaceae Justicia longii Hilsenbeck JULO3 Acanthaceae Ruellia nudiflora (Engelmann & A. Gray) Urban var. nudiflora RUNUN Agavaceae Agave ×ajoensis W.C. Hodgson Ajo Mountains agave AGAJ (hybrid) Agavaceae Agave deserti Engelmann subsp. simplex Gentry Desert agave AGDE Agavaceae Agave schottii Engelmann Shin dagger AGSC3 Agavaceae Yucca baccata Torrey Banana yucca YUBA Aizoaceae Mesembryanthemum crystallinum Linnaeus Crystal iceplant MECR3 Aizoaceae Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum Linnaeus Slenderleaf iceplant MENO2 Aizoaceae Trianthema portulacastrum Linnaeus Horse purslane TRPO2 Amaranthaceae Amaranthus albus Linnaeus Pigweed AMAL Amaranthaceae Amaranthus crassipes Schltdl. Var. crassipes Spreading amaranth AMCRC Amaranthaceae Amaranthus fimbriatus (Torrey) Bentham ex S. Watson Fringed pigweed AMFI Amaranthaceae Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson Careless weed, pigweed AMPA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus xtucsonensis Henrickson Tucson amaranth AMTU2 Amaranthaceae Gomphrena sonorae Torrey Sonoran globe- GOSO amaranth Amaranthaceae Tidestromia lanuginosa (Nuttall) Standley Honeysweet TILA2 Anacardiaceae Rhus
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Board of Directors: Please See Our Website Calendar for the Next [email protected] Rescued Cactus Sale
    TCSS BOARD Offi cers President: Richard Wiedhopf • [email protected] Vice President: Vonn Watkins • [email protected] Secretary: Susan Durham [email protected] Treasurer: Joe Frannea [email protected] Newsletter of the Tucson Cactus and Succulent Society January 2013 Board of Directors: Please see our Website Calendar for the next [email protected] rescued cactus sale. They are scheduled at various Thursday, January, 3, 2013 at 7:00 PM (Ending Dec. 31, 2013) times during the year based on our inventory. Linda Bartlett “The Road to Singapore” Cyndi Garrison TCSS Club Members receive a 10% discount Presented by Val Little with Mark Dimmitt and Gene Joseph William (Bill) Hicks Thomas Staudt January 2013 (Ending Dec. 31, 2014) Ed Bartlett Thursday, January 3, 2013 7:00pm Rob Romero Monthly Meeting, “The Road to Singapore” Joie Giunta presented by Val Little with Mark Dimmitt and Gene Joseph Bill Salisbury Tuesday, January 8, 2013 7:00pm (Ending Dec. 31, 2015) Board meeting at the U of A College of Pharmacy Keimpe Bronkhorst John Durham Linda Heisley Dale Johnson CSSA Affi liate Rep: Bill Holcombe (2013) Cactus Rescue [email protected] Aerial view of the Cloud Forest and Flower Dome, Gardens by the Bay, Cactus Rescue: Chris Monrad/Joe Frannea Singapore Education: Open Trained as both a Landscape Architect and an Anthropologist, Free Plants: Open Val Little is best known as the Director of the Water Conservation Floilegium: Margaret Pope • [email protected] Alliance of Southern Arizona. A long time traveller and plant Librarian: Joie Giunta • [email protected] geek, Val attended the opening of the new, Gardens by the Prickly Park: Jesse byrd (Implimentation) Bay, botanic garden in Singapore last summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E14, Biological Resources Technical Memorandum
    Final Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix E14, Biological Resources Technical Memorandum July 2021 Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S ADOT Project No. 999 SW 0 M5180 01P I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS Appendix E14, Biological Resources Technical Memorandum 1 This page intentionally left blank. July 2021 Project No. M5180 01P / Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS Appendix E14, Biological Resources Technical Memorandum 1 Table of Contents 2 E14 Biological Resources Technical Memorandum ...................................................... E14-1 3 E14.1 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................... E14-1 4 E14.1.1 Federal ..................................................................................................... E14-1 5 E14.1.2 State of Arizona ........................................................................................ E14-5 6 E14.1.3 Local Ordinances ..................................................................................... E14-6 7 E14.2 Methodology .................................................................................................... E14-8 8 E14.2.1 Biotic Communities (Vegetation and Wildlife) .......................................... E14-9 9 E14.2.2 Special Status Species ............................................................................ E14-9 10 E14.2.3 Wildlife Connectivity ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D SPECIAL STATUS PLANT SPECIES and NOXIOUS WEED SPECIES in the ANALYSIS AREA Southline Transmission Line Project Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Appendix D SPECIAL STATUS PLANT SPECIES AND NOXIOUS WEED SPECIES IN THE ANALYSIS AREA Southline Transmission Line Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Table D-1. Special Status Plant Species (endangered, threatened, and sensitive) That Were Analyzed for Potential to Occur within the Analysis Area; FWS, Arizona, and New Mexico Federal Status State Status Local Status Potential to Occur in Special Portions of the Arizona New Mexico Group/Family Genus Species Common Name ESA (County) BLM (District) USFS SDCP Designation Range Habitat Analysis Area in which (county) (County) Area(s) it is Listed as a Special Status Species Agavaceae Agave murpheyi Murphey's century plant BLM Sensitive State Protected Present in low numbers Inhabits benches or Unlikely. The analysis (Hohokam agave, or (Phoenix District) Species (Pinal) in desert foothills of alluvial terraces on area is outside the Murphey agave) Central Arizona (BLM, gentle bajada slopes known geographic range 2010). The only known above major drainages. for this species but may Pinal County locality is Found within the Lower contain suitable along Queen Creek near Colorado and Arizona desertscrub habitat. Superior, Arizona Upland subdivisions of (AGFD, 2003d; AGFD, the Sonoran Desert 2004m). Elevation range where former agricultural 1,300 to 3,200 feet areas were managed by (AGFD, 2003d). the Hohokam Indians (AGFD, 2003d). Agavaceae Agave parviflora Smallflower century State Protected Santa Cruz and southern Open slopes in None. The analysis area plant (Santa Cruz Species (Pima) Pima counties, Arizona, grasslands and oak is outside the highly striped agave Agave) and northern Mexico. woodlands (AGFD, restricted known range of Elevation range 3,600 to 2003f; ARPC, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Native Plant Salvage & Reestablishment
    Improving Native Plant Salvage & Reestablishment Brittany Taft, Intern Pima County Community Development and Neighborhood Conservation Julia Fonseca and Neva Connolly Pima County Office Of Sustainability and Conservation May 2015 Executive Summary Pima County residents have reaped the benefits of protecting, salvaging, growing and using native plants for many years. This report examines the status of recommendations that grew from the 2001 Native Plant Program report, written by County staff as part of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. Pima County has completed most of the recommended actions in the Native Plant Program, thereby minimizing some of the more harmful aspects of urban development on native plants and plant communities, and creating a more beautiful and sustainable urban landscape. Participating departments have included Transportation, Flood Control, Water Reclamation, Development Services, Sustainability and Conservation, Natural Resources and Parks and Recreation, and Community Services and Development. Key achievements that support the recommended actions include: • Protecting the wildlife habitat values that ironwood trees, saguaro cacti, and other native plants provide; • Reducing and offsetting damage to riparian habitats during development by requiring mitigation; • Using tens of thousands of native plants for County public works projects supplied by the Pima County native plant nursery; • Minimizing impacts to the endangered Pima Pineapple Cactus and protecting its habitat; • Showcasing the beauty of native plants in prominent settings, such as the County courthouse and public libraries, to promote their use more widely; • Improving the opportunities for salvaging and re-using cacti, agaves and other native plants in the landscape; • Integrating native plants into water harvesting and other low-impact development strategies; • Leading efforts to manage invasive species on County lands and rights-of-way; and • Assisting in the creation of the Southern Arizona Buffelgrass Coordination Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Plantpress 07Ii
    The Plant Press T H E A R I ZO NA NAT I V E P LA N T S OC I E TY VOLUME 31, NUMBER 2 OCTOBER 2007 A Tribute to Ferrell In this Issue: Secakuku by Jessa Fisher † Ethnobotany & Inherited Landscapes Ferrell Secakuku was an honored guest speaker at last year’s Arizona Botanists 1-2 A Tribute to Ferrell Secakuku Meeting. He belongs to the Hopi tribe, and 3-5 Central Arizona Agaves: A is a native of Sipaulovi Village on 2nd Mesa. Window to the Past Ferrell was recently diagnosed with terminal 5, 8-9 In the Eye of the Desert stomach cancer. An event in honor of his life was held at the Hopi Veterans Center in 6-8 The Effect of Land Kykotsmovi on July 16, 2007. We will miss Management Practices on the interacting with Ferrell and hope that his Distribution of Peniocereus striatus (Brandegee) Buxbaum transition to the next world is painless and 1 on Organ Pipe Cactus National swift. Monument, AZ Ferrell led an accomplished and active life. From 1994-1997, Ferrell was the Hopi Tribal 9-11 Succulents and Bighorn of Isla Chairman. During his tenure, he secured money for a new Hopi healthcare center. Perhaps his Tiburón greatest political achievement was negotiating the Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement agreement, 13 Robert Zahner Remembered allowing for both tribes to live in peace on their lands. 14-15 The Arizona Ethnobotanical As Tribal Chairman, he was instrumental in seeking protection for the N-aquifer, which sits Research Association Little under the Hopi and Navajo reservations.
    [Show full text]