DOCSLIB.ORG

A New Modified Method for Cycle-Slips Detection Based on Polynomial Fitting Method

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A New Modified Method for Cycle-Slips Detection Based on Polynomial Fitting Method A new modified method for cycle-slips detection based on Polynomial Fitting method Y. K WANG, Kezhao LI, Leijie ZHAO, Zhiwei Li，Jinben WEI Abstract: The polynomial fitting method has been using widely to detect cycle slips on the carrier phase of GNSS for its easily computer programming and simple algorithm. But the observation errors and sam- pling rate are two influence factors which influencing the accuracy of the cycle slips determination by the polynomial fitting method. In this contribution, we are using the method which combines the polynomial fitting method and Newton interpolation method for the solving of the two influence factors. In this paper we introduce the new method theory and its mathematical model. Finally a test is taken to prove the reli- able of the new method. And the test shows: the observation that when the sampling rate is interpolated to5s, the method can detect cycle-slips over 1 cycle. Key words: the polynomial fitting method; cycle-slips; Newton interpolation method; Standardization 1 Introduction GNSS is used to get the information of user position. And we using carrier phase positioning to get high-accuracy result of positioning [1, 2]. As for the receiver clock-offsets, ionosphere refraction and so on, cycle-slips exist in the carrier phases, therefore the detection of cycle-slips becomes important in pre- cise navigation and positioning [3, 4]. So far, there have been many ways to detect cycle-slips, such as the High-order difference method, the polynomial fitting method, wavelet analysis, but many of the modes are too difficult to make computer program, besides, many of them can’t be used for the detection of cy- cle-slips directly [5, 6]. To overcome these shortcomings, we make out a method that polynomial fitting combined with high-precision Newton interpolation, and it transform low frequency data to high frequency data. The lit- erature [7] shows that the Newton interpolation method does the arc approximation well. So we can solve the problem of big error influence in using polynomial fitting, and make full use of the advantages of polynomial fitting. Finally a test is taken to prove the validity of this method. Y. K WANG(*) School of Surveying and Landing Information Engineering of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China E-mail : [email protected] Kezhao LI School of Surveying and Landing Information Engineering of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China Leijie ZHAO School of Surveying and Landing Information Engineering of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China Zhiwei Li School of Surveying and Landing Information Engineering of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China Jinben WEI School of Surveying and Landing Information Engineering of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China 2 The Polynomial Fitting for Detecting Cycle-slips 2.1 The polynomial fitting model The model of polynomial fitting as follows [8]: 2 j%i=a0+a1(tii-t0)+-a20()tt (1) n +L+-ani()tt0 In Eq.(1), i=1,2,L,m ; m³+n1, m is the number of the epochs that participate the fitting; ti is the epoch of observation time; t0 is the initial time; n is the order of fitting. The step of detecting cycle slips as follows: (1) The first m carrier phases are used to calculate coefficients by the equation (1). (2) Solving the coefficients by the least square method, and get the mean errors by the follow equation: VV s = ii (2) j m-+()n1 In Eq.(2),s j is the mean error ; j represents the n-th fitting ; Vi is the residual error . (3) Using the coefficients that we get in the step (2) to extrapolate the next epoch phase observation, And get the differences between actual values and extrapolation values. (4) The result of step (3) will follow the judgment as follows: If the result follow the equation as follows: z jj-jsjj<×3 (3) It’s mean that there is no cycle-slips on the carrier phases, and then the first observe value will be discard and the next observe value is joining the next fitting. If the result follow the equation as follows: z jj-jsjj³×3 (4) It’s mean that there is a cycle-slip on the carrier phases ,then the integer part of the real values will be instead by the integer part of the extrapolated value, and the fractional part of the real value is retained. (5) Do the steps of (1)-(4) until to the end of the observations. It should be noted that as for the fourth derivative or the fifth derivative of the distance between satel- lites and Earth is close to zero [9].So the order of the polynomial of the article is use 4. And m=14, on the basis of literature [10]. The literature [11] shows that the fitting curve will be divergent because of the accumulation er- rors and time. So the method of the cycle-slips detection based on the polynomial fitting must be mod- ified. 2.2 Method improvement The original observations that we get directly from receivers contain a lot of errors. Mainly in- cludes, clock errors, ionosphere refraction, troposphere delay, multipath etc. These errors can be eliminated by using difference between the epoch observations. After differencing, Eq.(1) could be written: 2 Dji=b0+b1(ti-t0) +-b2(tti0) 34 (5) +b3(ti-t0) +-b4(tti0) In Eq.(5) Dji=-jji+1i. The equation shows that the difference between ()tt- and ()tt- n is getting bigger and big- i 0 i 0 ger, and the accumulation errors are getting bigger too. So differences between the real values and the extrapolations are also getting bigger and bigger. In this paper, we use one of the time series analysis to solve this situation. And the equation as follows: '' ttij-min { } u= 1££jk i '' (6) maxttjj-min 1££jk{ } 1££jk{ } ' r ' r In Eq.(6) ti=-(tti0) (r= 1,2,,34) ; tj=-(tti0) . And equation (5) could be written to: j =b+bu+bu2++bu34bu (7) %i01i2iii34 3 Newton Polynomial Interpolation Method The Newton polynomial interpolation could be expressed by the following equation [12]: Pn(ti) =c0+c1(ti-t0) +c2(ti--t0)(tti1) (8) +LL+cn(ti-t0)(ti--t1) (ttin) In Eq.(8) ci (i= 1,2n,,L ) is the Undetermined coefficients and Pn(tii) =D=j (i1,2n,,L) .So the dif- ference quotient of Newton polynomial as follow equation: ìct00=j( ) ï jj(tt) -() ïc==j[tt,] 01 ï101 tt- ï 01 ï jj[t0,,t1]-[tt12] íc2==j[t012,,tt] tt- ï 02 (9) ï L ï ï jj[t,t,LL,t]-[t,tt,,] c==jt,tt,, 01n-111n ï2[01nL] î tt02- Carrier phases are collected equally spaced. So we use the special case of the Newton interpola- tion. In this case the equation is more concise form and accuracy without lowering. So the Newton forward difference equation as follows [13]: k(k1-) 2 Pn()t=j()t0+k×Djj()tt00+D() 2! (10) k(k-1)(k-2)L(k-+1n) n +L+Dj()t0 n! tt- In Eq.(10) t=t+kh ; k=0,1,2n,,; h = n0. k0 L n Dmj=Dm--1jj-Dm1 (tk) (ttk+1k) ( ) (11) m i i =-å ( 1) Cfm i0=(tk+-ni) The normal interpolations can be obtained by the Eq. (9) and Eq.(10). And then we can deter- mine the value of the corresponding time interval of interpolation. 4 The new Method to Detect Cycle-slips In order to eliminate or abate influences by the receiver clock errors, ionosphere refraction, tro- posphere delay, multipath etc, we get differences of observation values. And the ionosphere refraction and troposphere delay of the process are substantially eliminated, and other kinds of errors are so small that can be ignored. So this is more conducive for improving the fitting accuracy. The literature [9] shows that the way to detect cycle slips by polynomial fitting is restricted by carrier phase measurement errors and sampling frequency. The difference values of the observations abate the observation errors. Now the Newton polynomial interpolation is used to solve the problem of the sampling frequency. Newton interpolation is used to interpolate low sampling frequency to higher sampling frequency of carrier phases, which helps improve the accuracy of fitting. And the new me- thod in this paper using the selected date in step (1) for the Newton interpolation, and its avoids the problem that caused by using the whole date which includes cycle slips. However, when the interpo- lated sampling frequency is too high, it will increase the amount of calculations. So combining with the literature [11], the low-frequency observations are interpolated to 5s, and when the observing envi- ronment is more severe they will be interpolated to 1s or 0.1s. The flow chart of the cycle slips detection and restoration with the polynomial fitting method and Newton interpolation method as follows: Differences between the epoch observations Time series standardization When t=t0 ,Take the first m phase observations to the equation (1.1) ,and begin the fitting setps Newton polynomial interpolation Get the coefficients Get the mean errors,and the next epoch phase observation Join the next epoch phase observation,and judge it if the end observation YES End the 否 Program The judgement of the cycle slips NO YES The integer part of the real values is instead by the integer part of the extrapolated value The first observe value is discard and the next observe value is joining the next fitting Figure 1 The algorithm flow chart of the cycle slip detection and restoration with the polynomial fitting method and Newton interpolation method 5 Experiment Based on the above described and in order to verify the correctness of the method, the data that be selected from the IGS offered in February 11, 2015 are used as an example.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fast and Efficient Algorithms for Evaluating Uniform and Nonuniform
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering Vol:13, No:8, 2019 Fast and Efficient Algorithms for Evaluating Uniform and Nonuniform Lagrange and Newton Curves Taweechai Nuntawisuttiwong, Natasha Dejdumrong Abstract—Newton-Lagrange Interpolations are widely used in quadratic computation time, which is slower than the others. numerical analysis. However, it requires a quadratic computational However, there are some curves in CAGD, Wang-Ball, DP time for their constructions. In computer aided geometric design and Dejdumrong curves with linear complexity. In order to (CAGD), there are some polynomial curves: Wang-Ball, DP and Dejdumrong curves, which have linear time complexity algorithms. reduce their computational time, Bezier´ curve is converted Thus, the computational time for Newton-Lagrange Interpolations into any of Wang-Ball, DP and Dejdumrong curves. Hence, can be reduced by applying the algorithms of Wang-Ball, DP and the computational time for Newton-Lagrange interpolations Dejdumrong curves. In order to use Wang-Ball, DP and Dejdumrong can be reduced by converting them into Wang-Ball, DP and algorithms, first, it is necessary to convert Newton-Lagrange Dejdumrong algorithms. Thus, it is necessary to investigate polynomials into Wang-Ball, DP or Dejdumrong polynomials. In this work, the algorithms for converting from both uniform and the conversion from Newton-Lagrange interpolation into non-uniform Newton-Lagrange polynomials into Wang-Ball, DP and the curves with linear complexity, Wang-Ball, DP and Dejdumrong polynomials are investigated. Thus, the computational Dejdumrong curves. An application of this work is to modify time for representing Newton-Lagrange polynomials can be reduced sketched image in CAD application with the computational into linear complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mials P
    Euclid's Algorithm 171 Euclid's Algorithm Horner’s method is a special case of Euclid's Algorithm which constructs, for given polyno- mials p and h =6 0, (unique) polynomials q and r with deg r<deg h so that p = hq + r: For variety, here is a nonstandard discussion of this algorithm, in terms of elimination. Assume that d h(t)=a0 + a1t + ···+ adt ;ad =06 ; and n p(t)=b0 + b1t + ···+ bnt : Then we seek a polynomial n−d q(t)=c0 + c1t + ···+ cn−dt for which r := p − hq has degree <d. This amounts to the square upper triangular linear system adc0 + ad−1c1 + ···+ a0cd = bd adc1 + ad−1c2 + ···+ a0cd+1 = bd+1 . adcn−d−1 + ad−1cn−d = bn−1 adcn−d = bn for the unknown coefficients c0;:::;cn−d which can be uniquely solved by back substitution since its diagonal entries all equal ad =0.6 19aug02 c 2002 Carl de Boor 172 18. Index Rough index for these notes 1-1:-5,2,8,40 cartesian product: 2 1-norm: 79 Cauchy(-Bunyakovski-Schwarz) 2-norm: 79 Inequality: 69 A-invariance: 125 Cauchy-Binet formula: -9, 166 A-invariant: 113 Cayley-Hamilton Theorem: 133 absolute value: 167 CBS Inequality: 69 absolutely homogeneous: 70, 79 Chaikin algorithm: 139 additive: 20 chain rule: 153 adjugate: 164 change of basis: -6 affine: 151 characteristic function: 7 affine combination: 148, 150 characteristic polynomial: -8, 130, 132, 134 affine hull: 150 circulant: 140 affine map: 149 codimension: 50, 53 affine polynomial: 152 coefficient vector: 21 affine space: 149 cofactor: 163 affinely independent: 151 column map: -6, 23 agrees with y at Λt:59 column space: 29 algebraic dual: 95 column
    [Show full text]
  • CS321-001 Introduction to Numerical Methods
    CS321-001 Introduction to Numerical Methods Lecture 3 Interpolation and Numerical Differentiation Professor Jun Zhang Department of Computer Science University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506-0633 Polynomial Interpolation Given a set of discrete values, how can we estimate other values between these data The method that we will use is called polynomial interpolation. We assume the data we had are from the evaluation of a smooth function. We may be able to use a polynomial p(x) to approximate this function, at least locally. A condition: the polynomial p(x) takes the given values at the given points (nodes), i.e., p(xi) = yi with 0 ≤ i ≤ n. The polynomial is said to interpolate the table, since we do not know the function. 2 Polynomial Interpolation Note that all the points are passed through by the curve 3 Polynomial Interpolation We do not know the original function, the interpolation may not be accurate 4 Order of Interpolating Polynomial A polynomial of degree 0, a constant function, interpolates one set of data If we have two sets of data, we can have an interpolating polynomial of degree 1, a linear function x x1 x x0 p(x) y0 y1 x0 x1 x1 x0 y1 y0 y0 (x x0 ) x1 x0 Review carefully if the interpolation condition is satisfied Interpolating polynomials can be written in several forms, the most well known ones are the Lagrange form and Newton form. Each has some advantages 5 Lagrange Form For a set of fixed nodes x0, x1, …, xn, the cardinal functions, l0, l1,…, ln, are defined as 0 if i j li (x j ) ij
    [Show full text]
  • Lagrange & Newton Interpolation
    Lagrange & Newton interpolation In this section, we shall study the polynomial interpolation in the form of Lagrange and Newton. Given a se- quence of (n +1) data points and a function f, the aim is to determine an n-th degree polynomial which interpol- ates f at these points. We shall resort to the notion of divided differences. Interpolation Given (n+1) points {(x0, y0), (x1, y1), …, (xn, yn)}, the points defined by (xi)0≤i≤n are called points of interpolation. The points defined by (yi)0≤i≤n are the values of interpolation. To interpolate a function f, the values of interpolation are defined as follows: yi = f(xi), i = 0, …, n. Lagrange interpolation polynomial The purpose here is to determine the unique polynomial of degree n, Pn which verifies Pn(xi) = f(xi), i = 0, …, n. The polynomial which meets this equality is Lagrange interpolation polynomial n Pnx=∑ l j x f x j j=0 where the lj ’s are polynomials of degree n forming a basis of Pn n x−xi x−x0 x−x j−1 x−x j 1 x−xn l j x= ∏ = ⋯ ⋯ i=0,i≠ j x j −xi x j−x0 x j−x j−1 x j−x j1 x j−xn Properties of Lagrange interpolation polynomial and Lagrange basis They are the lj polynomials which verify the following property: l x = = 1 i= j , ∀ i=0,...,n. j i ji {0 i≠ j They form a basis of the vector space Pn of polynomials of degree at most equal to n n ∑ j l j x=0 j=0 By setting: x = xi, we obtain: n n ∑ j l j xi =∑ j ji=0 ⇒ i =0 j=0 j=0 The set (lj)0≤j≤n is linearly independent and consists of n + 1 vectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Topics
    A Mathematical Topics This chapter discusses most of the mathematical background needed for a thor­ ough understanding of the material presented in the book. It has been mentioned in the Preface, however, that math concepts which are only used once (such as the mediation operator and points vs. vectors) are discussed right where they are introduced. Do not worry too much about your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you that mine a.re still greater. - Albert Einstein. A.I Fourier Transforms Our curves are functions of an arbitrary parameter t. For functions used in science and engineering, time is often the parameter (or the independent variable). We, therefore, say that a function g( t) is represented in the time domain. Since a typical function oscillates, we can think of it as being similar to a wave and we may try to represent it as a wave (or as a combination of waves). When this is done, we have the function G(f), where f stands for the frequency of the wave, and we say that the function is represented in the frequency domain. This turns out to be a useful concept, since many operations on functions are easy to carry out in the frequency domain. Transforming a function between the time and frequency domains is easy when the function is periodic, but it can also be done for certain non periodic functions. The present discussion is restricted to periodic functions. 1IIIt Definition: A function g( t) is periodic if (and only if) there exists a constant P such that g(t+P) = g(t) for all values of t (Figure A.la).
    [Show full text]
  • A Low‐Cost Solution to Motion Tracking Using an Array of Sonar Sensors and An
    A Low‐cost Solution to Motion Tracking Using an Array of Sonar Sensors and an Inertial Measurement Unit A thesis presented to the faculty of the Russ College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Jason S. Maxwell August 2009 © 2009 Jason S. Maxwell. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled A Low‐cost Solution to Motion Tracking Using an Array of Sonar Sensors and an Inertial Measurement Unit by JASON S. MAXWELL has been approved for the School of Electrical Engineering Computer Science and the Russ College of Engineering and Technology by Maarten Uijt de Haag Associate Professor School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dennis Irwin Dean, Russ College of Engineering and Technology 3 ABSTRACT MAXWELL, JASON S., M.S., August 2009, Electrical Engineering A Low‐cost Solution to Motion Tracking Using an Array of Sonar Sensors and an Inertial Measurement Unit (91 pp.) Director of Thesis: Maarten Uijt de Haag As the desire and need for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) increases, so to do the navigation and system demands for the vehicles. While there are a multitude of systems currently offering solutions, each also possess inherent problems. The Global Positioning System (GPS), for instance, is potentially unable to meet the demands of vehicles that operate indoors, in heavy foliage, or in urban canyons, due to the lack of signal strength. Laser‐based systems have proven to be rather costly, and can potentially fail in areas in which the surface absorbs light, and in urban environments with glass or mirrored surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The AMATYC Review, Fall 1992-Spring 1993. INSTITUTION American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 354 956 JC 930 126 AUTHOR Cohen, Don, Ed.; Browne, Joseph, Ed. TITLE The AMATYC Review, Fall 1992-Spring 1993. INSTITUTION American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. REPORT NO ISSN-0740-8404 PUB DATE 93 NOTE 203p. AVAILABLE FROMAMATYC Treasurer, State Technical Institute at Memphis, 5983 Macon Cove, Memphis, TN 38134 (for libraries 2 issues free with $25 annual membership). PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT AMATYC Review; v14 n1-2 Fall 1992-Spr 1993 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *College Mathematics; Community Colleges; Computer Simulation; Functions (Mathematics); Linear Programing; *Mathematical Applications; *Mathematical Concepts; Mathematical Formulas; *Mathematics Instruction; Mathematics Teachers; Technical Mathematics; Two Year Colleges ABSTRACT Designed as an avenue of communication for mathematics educators concerned with the views, ideas, and experiences of two-year collage students and teachers, this journal contains articles on mathematics expoition and education,as well as regular features presenting book and software reviews and math problems. The first of two issues of volume 14 contains the following major articles: "Technology in the Mathematics Classroom," by Mike Davidson; "Reflections on Arithmetic-Progression Factorials," by William E. Rosentl,e1; "The Investigation of Tangent Polynomials with a Computer Algebra System," by John H. Mathews and Russell W. Howell; "On Finding the General Term of a Sequence Using Lagrange Interpolation," by Sheldon Gordon and Robert Decker; "The Floating Leaf Problem," by Richard L. Francis; "Approximations to the Hypergeometric Distribution," by Chltra Gunawardena and K. L. D. Gunawardena; aid "Generating 'JE(3)' with Some Elementary Applications," by John J. Edgeli, Jr. The second issue contains: "Strategies for Making Mathematics Work for Minorities," by Beverly J.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Interpolation and Polynomial Approximation
    Chapter 3 Interpolation and Polynomial Approximation The computational procedures used in computer software for the evaluation of a li- brary function such as sin(x); cos(x), or ex, involve polynomial approximation. The state-of-the-art methods use rational functions (which are the quotients of polynomi- als). However, the theory of polynomial approximation is suitable for a first course in numerical analysis, and we consider them in this chapter. Suppose that the function f(x) = ex is to be approximated by a polynomial of degree n = 2 over the interval [¡1; 1]. The Taylor polynomial is shown in Figure 1.1(a) and can be contrasted with 2 x The Taylor polynomial p(x)=1+x+0.5x2 which approximates f(x)=ex over [−1,1] The Chebyshev approximation q(x)=1+1.129772x+0.532042x for f(x)=e over [−1,1] 3 3 2.5 2.5 y=ex 2 2 y=ex 1.5 1.5 2 1 y=1+x+0.5x 1 y=q(x) 0.5 0.5 0 0 −1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 −1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Figure 1.1(a) Figure 1.1(b) Figure 3.1 (a) The Taylor polynomial p(x) = 1:000000+ 1:000000x +0:500000x2 which approximate f(x) = ex over [¡1; 1]. (b) The Chebyshev approximation q(x) = 1:000000 + 1:129772x + 0:532042x2 for f(x) = ex over [¡1; 1].
    [Show full text]
  • Anl-7826 Chinese Remainder Ind Interpolation
    ANL-7826 CHINESE REMAINDER IND INTERPOLATION ALGORITHMS John D. Lipson UolC-AUA-USAEC- ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY, ARGONNE, ILLINOIS Prepared for the U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION under contract W-31-109-Eng-38 The facilities of Argonne National Laboratory are owned by the United States Govern­ ment. Under the terms of a contract (W-31 -109-Eng-38) between the U. S. Atomic Energy 1 Commission. Argonne Universities Association and The University of Chicago, the University employs the staff and operates the Laboratory in accordance with policies and programs formu­ lated, approved and reviewed by the Association. MEMBERS OF ARGONNE UNIVERSITIES ASSOCIATION The University of Arizona Kansas State University The Ohio State University Carnegie-Mellon University The University of Kansas Ohio University Case Western Reserve University Loyola University The Pennsylvania State University The University of Chicago Marquette University Purdue University University of Cincinnati Michigan State University Saint Louis University Illinois Institute of Technology The University of Michigan Southern Illinois University University of Illinois University of Minnesota The University of Texas at Austin Indiana University University of Missouri Washington University Iowa State University Northwestern University Wayne State University The University of Iowa University of Notre Dame The University of Wisconsin NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Atomic Energy Commission, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontrac­ tors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics for IT Engineers
    Mathematics for IT Engineers Pál Burai Copyright c 2019 Pál Burai UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN WWW.UNIDEB.HU Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License (the “License”). You may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an “AS IS” BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. This work was supported by the construction EFOP-3.4.3-16-2016-00021. The project was sup- ported by the European Union, co-financed by the European Social Fund. Contents 1 Complex numbers .............................................5 1.1 A possible motivation introducing complex numbers5 1.2 Operations with complex numbers in algebraic form6 1.2.1 Algebraic form, real part, imaginary part..............................6 1.2.2 Graphical representation of complex numbers on the complex plane.......7 1.2.3 Addition of complex numbers in algebraic form........................8 1.2.4 Multiplication of complex numbers in algebraic form.....................9 1.2.5 Conjugate of complex numbers.................................... 12 1.3 Polar form and exponential form of complex numbers 13 1.3.1 Length and angle of complex numbers.............................. 13 1.3.2 Calculation with complex numbers in polar form....................... 18 1.3.3 Euler’s formula.................................................. 26 1.3.4 Calculation with complex numbers in exponential form................
    [Show full text]
  • Math 375: Lecture Notes
    Math 375: Lecture notes Professor Monika Nitsche September 21, 2011 Contents 1 MATLAB Basics 8 1.1 Example:Plottingafunction . ... 8 1.2 Scripts....................................... 9 1.3 Settingupvectors................................ 10 1.4 VectorandMatrixoperations . 11 1.5 Plotting ...................................... 14 1.6 Printingdata ................................... 15 1.7 Forloops...................................... 15 1.8 Whileloops .................................... 16 1.9 Timingcode.................................... 17 1.10Functions ..................................... 17 2 Computing Fundamentals 20 2.1 Vectorizing, timing, operation counts, memory allocation........... 20 2.1.1 Vectorizing for legibility and speed . 20 1 2.1.2 Memoryallocation ............................ 21 2.1.3 Counting operations: Horner’s algorithm . 21 2.1.4 Counting operations: evaluating series . 22 2.2 Machine Representation of real numbers, Roundoff errors . ......... 23 2.2.1 Decimal and binary representation of reals . ..... 23 2.2.2 Floating point representation of reals . ..... 24 2.2.3 Machine precision, IEEE rounding, roundoff error . ...... 25 2.2.4 Loss of significant digits during subtraction . 27 2.3 Approximating derivatives, Taylor’s Theorem, plotting y = hp ........ 29 2.4 Big-ONotation .................................. 30 3 Solving nonlinear equations f(x) = 0 31 3.1 Bisection method to solve f(x)=0( 1.1).................... 32 § 3.2 Fixed point iteration to solve x = g(x) (FPI, 1.2)............... 34 § 3.2.1 Examples ................................. 34 3.2.2 TheFPI.................................. 34 3.2.3 ImplementingFPIinMatlab. 35 3.2.4 TheoreticalResults ............................ 35 3.2.5 Definitions................................. 37 3.2.6 Stoppingcriterion. 37 3.3 Newton’s method to solve f(x)=0( 1.4) ................... 38 § 3.3.1 Thealgorithm............................... 38 3.3.2 Matlabimplementation. 38 2 3.3.3 Theoreticalresults ............................ 39 3.4 Secant method ( 1.5)..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Piecewise Polynomial Taylor Expansions – the Generalization of Fa`A Di Bruno's Formula
    Takustr. 7 Zuse Institute Berlin 14195 Berlin Germany TOM STREUBEL1,CAREN TISCHENDORF,ANDREAS GRIEWANK2 Piecewise Polynomial Taylor Expansions – The Generalization of Faa` di Bruno’s Formula 1 0000-0003-4917-7977 2 0000-0001-9839-1473 ZIB Report 18-24 (May 2018) Zuse Institute Berlin Takustr. 7 14195 Berlin Germany Telephone: +49 30-84185-0 Telefax: +49 30-84185-125 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.zib.de ZIB-Report (Print) ISSN 1438-0064 ZIB-Report (Internet) ISSN 2192-7782 Piecewise Polynomial Taylor Expansions – The Generalization of Faa` di Bruno’s Formula Tom Streubel and Caren Tischendorf and Andreas Griewank Abstract We present an extension of Taylor’s theorem towards nonsmooth evalua- tion procedures incorporating absolute value operaions. Evaluations procedures are computer programs of mathematical functions in closed form expression and al- low a different treatment of smooth operations and calls to the absolute value value function. The well known classical Theorem of Taylor defines polynomial approx- imation of sufficiently smooth functions and is widely used for the derivation and analysis of numerical integrators for systems of ordinary differential or differential algebraic equations, for the construction of solvers for the continuous nonlinear op- timization of finite dimensional objective functions and for root solving of nonlinear systems of equations. The herein provided proof is construtive and allow efficiently designed algorithms for the execution and computation of generalized piecewise polynomial expansions.
    [Show full text]