DOCSLIB.ORG

Glasgow City Council’S Social Work Services to the Criminal Justice System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Glasgow City Council’S Social Work Services to the Criminal Justice System Criminal Justice Services Introduction to Criminal Justice Services The information in this leaflet lists the wide range of services provided by Glasgow City Council’s Social Work Services to the Criminal Justice System. These services include: • supporting victims of crime and their families • assisting people attending Court whether as witnesses, accused people or offenders • supervising offenders on Community Service Orders who are required to perform unpaid, useful work to the benefit of the community • providing background reports on offenders to Courts – these assist decisions on bail and sentencing • preparing reports for the Parole Board to assist decisions about early release from prison • supervising offenders in the community • working with prisoners (and their families) whilst in prison and on release Other leaflets are available which provide more detail about each area of service for example, ‘Social Work Reports to Court’, ‘Your Probation Order’, and ‘A guide to Community Service Orders’. Social Work Services’ responsibilities It is the responsibility of Social Work Services to: • promote and contribute to community safety and public protection • challenge offending behaviour – help offenders realise the impact of their behaviour on themselves, their families, the community and their victims • provide effective supervision of offenders in the community • provide Courts with a range of alternatives to prison • assist with problems that may contribute to offending, for example, drug or alcohol misuse Criminal Justice Social Work Services in Glasgow are provided by the City Council, voluntary organisations and community groups. Access to these services can be obtained at Court, in prison or through local social work offices. Social Work Services’ main aims include: • tackling and reducing offending behaviour • supporting victims of crime • supervising offenders in the community • assisting prisoners re-settle into the community after release from custody Offenders are supervised on: • Probation - to reduce offending behaviour • Community Service Orders – to repay the community for the offences they have committed • Supervised Attendance Orders – as an alternative to prison for failing to pay a fine • Bail – as an alternative to remand in prison • Parole – to aid rehabilitation • Supervised Release and other prison aftercare orders – to assist public safety and community protection How to ask for services Social work services are usually arranged through your local social work office (see links to contact information at the back of this leaflet). Criminal Justice Social Work Services are often a requirement of a court or prison release order. Criminal Justice Services are also available to: victims of crime; people attending court; people who have left prison in the past year; community groups or individuals who could benefit from the community service by offenders scheme. These services can be arranged through one of the following: Your local social work office - opening times are: Mon – Thurs 8.45am – 4.45pm Friday 8.45am – 3.55pm Please note that not all local social work offices offer Criminal Justice Services, if you are unsure please phone first. Criminal Justice Services are available at the following addresses: Social Work Unit Social Work Unit Glasgow Sheriff Court Glasgow Justice of the Peace Court 1 Carlton Place 1 Carlton Place Glasgow G5 9DA Glasgow G5 9DA Phone: 0141 276 1845 Phone: 0141 276 1845 Bail Service Social Work Unit Glasgow Sheriff Court Glasgow High Court (Address as above) 1 Mart Street Phone: 0141 276 1845 Glasgow G1 5NA Phone: 0141 559 4529 Glasgow Drug Court / Drug HMP Barlinnie Testing and Treatment Orders Lee Avenue Glasgow Sheriff Court Glasgow G33 2QX 80 Norfolk Street Phone: 0141 770 2123 Glasgow G5 9EJ Phone: 0141 274 6000 Emergency situations If you have an emergency: • within office hours, we will give you an urgent appointment • outwith office hours, phone our Standby Service on: 0800 811505 There are a number of other organisations who provide information advice and support to people affected by or involved in the criminal justice system and their families. Some of the main ones are listed here: Victim Support Scotland SACRO 10 Jocelyn Square Central Chambers Glasgow G1 5JU 93 Hope Street Phone: 0845 603 9213 Glasgow G2 6LD (low rate call) Phone: 0141 248 1763 APEX (Scotland) Dick Stewart Project 45 Hope Street Crossreach Glasgow G2 6AE 40 Circus Drive Phone: 0141 248 4537 Glasgow G31 2JE Phone: 0141 554 0277 Turning Point Talbot Association 123 West Street Kingston Halls Glasgow G5 8BA 344 Paisley Road Phone: 0141 420 6969 Glasgow G5 8RE (drug users only) Phone: 0141 429 4541 Do you require interpreting or signing services at your appointment? If you need to communicate in a language other than English we can arrange an interpreter. If you arrive at an area office, the member of staff you see can arrange telephone interpreting in Urdu, Punjabi and Chinese. We can then deal with your issue via telephone interpreting or make an appointment when an interpreter can attend in person. If you require interpreting in any other language, an appointment will be made when an interpreter can be present. This leaflet is also available in Urdu, Punjabi and Chinese. Ask for a copy at reception in your local area office or telephone the Social Work Services Unit on: Communications 0141 420 5500 If you have a hearing impairment and would like an interpreter to attend your appointment please let us know and we will make the necessary arrangements. Arranging interpreters may mean you have to wait a bit longer for an appointment. If you have difficulty reading this leaflet or know someone who may have difficulty, it is also available on tape, disc, in Braille and large print. If you would like a copy in one of these formats ask at reception or telephone the Centre for Sensory Impaired People on: 0141 276 5252 Other information We have a number of other factsheets and leaflets on topics we are often asked about. Information is being developed all the time. The receptionist at your local social work office will tell you what information is available. If you prefer you can phone the Social Work Services Communications Unit on: 0141 420 5500 OUR COMMITMENT TO YOU Confidentiality We will as far as possible respect your confidentiality and you have legal rights under the Data Protection Act. If you would like further information ask at your appointment. Equality We are committed to ensuring that: • our services are equally open to all • we will not accept discrimination or harassment on any grounds by either our staff or people using our services • we gather statistics about our services to ensure standards are being met, and to plan for future service provision - you may be asked to provide information to assist us in this • we publish reports regularly on our performance in meeting these standards Welfare rights advice You can be provided with welfare rights advice to promote full uptake of benefit. Involving you in the service We will involve you as much as possible in discussion and decisions affecting your situation and in planning the services you receive. Would you like to comment on the service you get? If you would like to make a suggestion, comment or complaint about the service you have received from us please speak to a member of staff at your local area office. Any comments we receive help us plan our future services. You could also pick up a leaflet called `Comments, Compliments Complaints' at your local office, which explains how to comment in writing or by phone. If we are unable to resolve your complaint to your satisfaction, you will then have the right to refer the matter to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman by writing to Freepost EH641, Edinburgh, EH3 0BR or telephoning 0800 377 7330. You must do this within 12 months of first being notified of the matters you are complaining about. Contact Information for Local Social Work Offices Information on contact details for local social work offices can be found by selecting the links below. Please note that links will open in a new browser window. North East local social work office North West local social work office South local social work office Produced by Glasgow City Council,Social Work Services, Communications Unit, Wheatley House, 25 Cochrane Street, Glasgow, G1 1HL Phone: 0141 420 5500 Ref: SW009/September99 This material cannot be reproduced in whole or in part in any form by any means without the prior consent of Glasgow City Council Social Work Services..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Legal Terms Used in Scottish Court Procedure, Neil Kelly Partner
    Legal Terms Used in Scottish Court Procedure, Neil Kelly Partner, MacRoberts Many recent reported adjudication decisions have come from the Scottish Courts. Therefore, as part of the case notes update, we have included a brief explanation of some of the Scottish Court procedures. There are noted below certain legal terms used in Scottish Court Procedure with a brief explanation of them. This is done in an attempt to give some readers a better understanding of some of the terms used in the Scottish cases highlighted on this web-site. 1. Action: Legal proceedings before a Court in Scotland initiated by Initial Writ or Summons. 2. Adjustment (of Pleadings): The process by which a party changes its written pleadings during the period allowed by the Court for adjustment. 3. Amendment (of Pleadings): The process by which a party changes its written pleadings after the period for adjustment has expired. Amendment requires leave of the Court. 4. Appeal to Sheriff Principal: In certain circumstances an appeal may be taken from a decision of a Sheriff to the Sheriff Principal. In some cases leave of the Sheriff is required. 5. Appeal to Court of Session: In certain circumstances an appeal may be taken from a decision of a Sheriff directly to the Court of Session or from a decision of the Sheriff Principal to the Court of Session. Such an appeal may require leave of the Sheriff or Sheriff Principal who pronounced the decision. Such an appeal will be heard by the Inner House of the Court of Session. 6. Arrestment: The process of diligence under which a Pursuer (or Defender in a counterclaim) can obtain security for a claim by freezing moveable (personal) property of the debtor in the hands of third parties e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 162 INTERNATIONAL LAWYER Long Before the 1957 Law, Indigent
    162 INTERNATIONAL LAWYER Long before the 1957 law, indigent litigants could obtain exemption from judicial fees payable for actions in courts. The presently effective statute, 53 which dates from 1936, is part of the Code of Civil Procedure; it regulates in detail the bases on which an indigent litigant can obtain a waiver of court costs. A person who seeks legal aid either gratuitously or at a reduced rate initiates his request by obtaining from the Municipality a form, which must be filled out personally by the applicant, setting forth the financial situation on which he bases his claim that he is unable to obtain needed assistance via his own resources. Information furnished on the form is checked by the Municipality, and the application is then submitted to the consultation bureau for processing and determination of the legal aid which will be furnished. Information furnished by the applicant is further subject to examination by the court which may seek confirmation of the financial condition alleged from the tax authorities. 2. CRIMINAL MATTERS Counsel has always been available to indigent defendants in criminal matters involving a felony. 154 Within the jurisdiction of each court of first instance, a court-appointed Council for Legal Assistance functions in crim- inal matters, consisting of at least three attorneys. The Council assigns attorneys to indigent defendants in criminal matters as provided in the Code of Criminal Procedure and further as the Council may deem fit. Each defendant in provisional custody must be assigned counsel by the president of the court before which the matter will be adjudicated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Bar: the Evolution of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting, 28 La
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 28 | Number 2 February 1968 The cottS ish Bar: The volutE ion of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting Nan Wilson Repository Citation Nan Wilson, The Scottish Bar: The Evolution of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting, 28 La. L. Rev. (1968) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol28/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SCOTTISH BAR: THE EVOLUTION OF THE FACULTY OF ADVOCATES IN ITS HISTORICAL SOCIAL SETTING Nan Wilson* Although the expression "advocate" is used in early Scottish statutes such as the Act of 1424, c. 45, which provided for legal aid to the indigent, the Faculty of Advocates as such dates from 1532 when the Court of Session was constituted as a College of Justice. Before this time, though friends of litigants could appear as unpaid amateurs, there had, of course, been professional lawyers, lay and ecclesiastical, variously described as "fore- speakers," procurators and prolocutors. The functions of advo- cate and solicitor had not yet been differentiated, though the notary had been for historical reasons. The law teacher was then essentially an ecclesiastic. As early as 1455, a distinctive costume (a green tabard) for pleaders was prescribed by Act of Parliament.' Between 1496 and 1501, at least a dozen pleaders can be identified as in extensive practice before the highest courts, and procurators appeared regularly in the Sheriff Courts.2 The position of notary also flourished in Scotland as on the Continent, though from 1469 the King asserted the exclusive right to appoint candidates for that branch of legal practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Report: a Thousand Small Sanities
    Conference Report: A Thousand Small Sanities The Park Hotel, Kilmarnock Thursday, 15 November 2012 , Contents 1. Introduction 2. Aims of the Event 3. Programme 4. Evaluation 5. Next Steps 6. Useful Links and Contacts Introduction Inspired by a paper, “A Thousand Small Sanities – Crime Control Lessons from New York” produced by Greg Berman from the Centre for Justice Innovation, South West Scotland CJA decided to host an event to bring together partners to share and build upon the concept that a combination of many small, good ideas can significantly improve the lives of individuals, families and communities affected by crime. Delegates had been asked to read the paper prior to the event to familiarise themselves with the concept. http://173.231.132.82/sites/default/files/documents/AThousandSmallSanities_June11b_color.pdf The Director of the Centre for Justice Innovation, Phil Bowen, was invited to speak at the event to give his view on incremental innovation. The Centre for Justice Innovation seeks to promote criminal justice reform in the United Kingdom by helping to improve the implementation, evaluation and dissemination of demonstration projects. This London‐based Centre is a project of the Centre for Court Innovation, a New York‐based non‐profit organisation that has helped to create dozens of demonstration projects, including the award‐winning Red Hook Community Justice Centre. Delegates were also able to view the film, The Road from Crime1, which was produced by The Institute for Research and Innovation in Social Services (IRISS) as part of a project to share knowledge and improve understanding about why people desist from offending.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Council Scotland
    Response questionnaire project group Timeliness Judicial Council of Scotland 1. The Court System and Available Statistics 1.1 The court system in Scotland comprises a hierarchy of courts. At the top of the hierarchy is the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, which is located in London. It has an appellate jurisdiction from the Scottish courts in civil matters and, since the devolution arrangement which was introduced in 1999, in human rights issues in relation to criminal matters. Until devolution, there was no right of appeal in criminal matters to London. The senior courts in Scotland are the Court of Session (civil matters) and the High Court (criminal matters). Rather confusingly, as a result of practice before the Union of Scotland and England in 1707, they are known as the Supreme Courts of Scotland. Thus when we refer below to the Supreme Courts Programming Board, we are speaking of a Scottish rather than a UK body. The Court of Session and the High Court have both a first instance and an appellate jurisdiction. The High Court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear cases involving certain serious crimes and its judges have a sentencing power which is considerably greater than that conferred on sheriffs, who cannot impose a sentence of imprisonment which is more than for five years. At a local level there are sheriff courts, each of which has a defined geographical jurisdiction within Scotland. Sheriffs have jurisdiction in both civil and criminal matters. Almost all family cases are now heard in the sheriff court. Civil cases with a value of £5,000 or less must be heard in the sheriff court and cannot be raised in the Court of Session.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judiciary in Scotland
    The Judiciary in Scotland The Judicial Office for Scotland provides support to the Lord President in his role as Head of the Scottish judges and tribunal presidents. He is supported by the second most senior judge in Scotland - the Lord Justice Clerk. All judges in Scotland are independent. They make their decisions based on the law and the circumstances of each case. Scotland has a unique justice system which is different to the rest of the UK. Criminal cases There are two types of criminal procedure in Scotland: solemn procedure for more serious offences and summary procedure. When a trial is held against a person accused of a crime, a jury decides the verdict in solemn cases. The judge decides the verdict in summary cases. There are three verdicts in Scotland: Guilty Not Guilty Not Proven The not proven verdict is unique to Scotland. When the verdict in a case is not guilty or not proven, the accused person cannot usually be retried in court for the crime (except in highly exceptional circumstances, for example if new evidence were found that was not available at the trial of a serious crime). In all cases where an accused person is convicted of a crime, the judge decides what the appropriate sentence should be. Sentencing There are a number of sentencing options in Scotland including prison; community payback; or a fine. Community Payback Orders can involve unpaid work; a compensation payment to a victim; supervision; and mental health, drug or alcohol treatment. Judges base their sentencing decisions on what they have heard in court from the prosecution and the defence about the circumstances of the crime (including the impact on any victims) and the personal circumstances of the offender.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing the Scottish Civil Court System 20 August 2009 09/52 Sarah Harvie-Clark
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament Information Centre logos. SPICe Briefing The Scottish Civil Court System 20 August 2009 09/52 Sarah Harvie-Clark This Briefing provides an overview of the civil court system in Scotland. In particular it: • provides an introduction to the civil justice system in Scotland (of which the civil courts form an important part) • explains key terminology associated with the civil courts • outlines the structure of the civil court system • discusses recent policy developments associated with the civil court system, including the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 (asp 6) and the ongoing review of the civil court system chaired by Lord Gill This briefing updates the earlier SPICe Subject Map of the same name (Harvie-Clark 2007). For an overview of the system of criminal courts in Scotland see the SPICe Subject Map entitled The Scottish Criminal Justice System: the Criminal Courts (McCallum et al 2007). CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................................3 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM ...........................................................................................5 CIVIL LAW AND CIVIL JUSTICE........................................................................................................................................5 THE CIVIL COURTS AS PART OF A WIDER SYSTEM ...........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Court-Security-Manua
    Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office Law Enforcement Security Manual Revised 10-2019 TABLE OF CONENTS SECTION PAGE SECTION 1 – Court Security ORG Chart Court Security Organizational Chart ....................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 – Laws, Policies, Procedures, Plans and Committees Basic Courtroom Responsibilities…………………………………………………….5 -10 Bomb Threat-Lexipol 416……………………………………………………………...11 Courthouse Security – General Procedures ............................................................................. 11-13 Escape Prevention-Lexipol 903………………………………………………………...13 Evacuation Planning of Court Facilities ................................................................................... 14-16 Evacuation of Court Holding Facilities-Inmate Evacuation…………………………...16 Firearms/Weapons Control and Safety ……………………………………………….16-17 Fire Extinguisher Locations…………………………………………………………...18-19 Tower Takeover/Active Shooter……………………………………………………. 20-21 High Profile/High Risk Trials………………………………………………………. .. 22-23 Hostage:-Lexipol 414.1 ................................................................................................................. 23 Incident Reporting ...................................................................................................................... 24 Jurisdictional Responsibilities..................................................................................................... 25-26 Jury Trial Guidelines ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SHERIFF APPEAL COURT [2017] SAC (Civ) 24 PER-B238-15 Sheriff
    SHERIFF APPEAL COURT [2017] SAC (Civ) 24 PER-B238-15 Sheriff Principal Lewis Sheriff Braid Sheriff Cubie OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by SHERIFF BRAID in appeal by TJ Appellant against SB Respondent Appellant: Cheyne Respondent: McAlpine 1 August 2017 Introduction [1] This is an appeal against the decision of the sheriff at Perth, made on 20 January 2017, to make no further order in respect of her earlier finding that the respondent was in contempt of court due to her failure to obtemper a contact order. The issue before us at this stage is whether the appellant has any locus to pursue the appeal. A hearing on that issue took place on 23 June 2017, following a preliminary view having been expressed by the procedural Appeal Sheriff that there was no such locus. Both parties were represented by counsel. 2 [2] At the outset, may we say that we recognise that in paragraph 31 of the court’s opinion in Robertson and Gough v HM Advocate 2008 JC 146, at page 155, the Lord Justice-Clerk (Gill) said:- “Despite indications to the contrary in certain nineteenth century authorities (Mackenzie and Munro v Magistrates of Dingwall (1839) 1 D 487, Lord Gillies, p 492; HM Adv v Robertson (1842) 1 Broun 152, Lord Justice Clerk Hope, p 160; Paterson v Kilgour (1865) 3 M 1119, Lord Deas, p 1123; MacLeod v Speirs (1884) 5 Coup 387, Lord Young, p 403), contempt of court is not a crime per se. It is a sui generis offence committed against the court itself which it is peculiarly within the province of the court to punish (Mayer v HM Advocate, [2005 1JC 121]; HM Advocate v Airs, [1975 JC 64]; Petrie v Angus (1889) 17 R (J) 3).
    [Show full text]
  • The Judiciary in Scotland
    The Judiciary in Scotland The Judicial Office for Scotland provides support to the Lord President in his role as Head of the Scottish judges. All judges in Scotland are independent and make their decisions based on the law and the circumstances of each case. Scotland has a unique justice system which is different to the rest of the UK. Civil cases Civil cases are those in which one person brings an action against another person seeking some form of redress or other remedy. There is a wide range of civil matters. A few examples are: family issues such as divorce; personal injury claims; breaches of a contract and the review of local or central government decisions. The judge will decide what facts of the two sides presented in court have been proven and decide what should be done as a result. For example, if a person injured at work sues an employer for a sum of money (as damages), the judge decides whether the employer should pay the person, and if so, how much. Civil courts There are different civil courts in Scotland. The Court of Session is Scotland’s highest civil court. Senior judges deal with high value cases including claims for more than £100,000. The Court, which sits in Edinburgh, is divided into the Outer House and the Inner House. The Outer House hears cases when they first come to court (called first instance). Normally a single judge hears the case, but occasionally the judge will sit with a jury of 12 people. If a party in a case is not satisfied with the decision, they can appeal it.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Criminal Women in Scotland: an Assessment of the Scarcity of Female Offenders in the Records of the High Court of Justiciary, 1524-1542
    Managing Criminal Women in Scotland: An Assessment of the Scarcity of Female Offenders in the Records of the High Court of Justiciary, 1524-1542 by Chelsea D. M. Hartlen Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2014 © Copyright by Chelsea D. M. Hartlen 2014 Table of Contents Abstract.……………………………………………………..………………...……...iii List of Abbreviations Used.........................................................................................iv Acknowledgements....………………………….………………………………………v Chapter 1: Introduction …….………………………………………………………….1 1.1: Sources and Evidence……………………………………………………...3 1.2: Women and Crime in Pre-Modern Europe……………………………….10 1.3: Controlling Misbehaviour in Scotland……………………………………13 1.4: Themes and Arguments…………………………………………………..15 1.5: Scotland and the Borders in the Reign of James V….…………………….18 Chapter 2: Patterns of Prosecution: Women, Crime and the Courts in Sixteenth-Century Scotland...……………………..23 2.1: Women before the High Court of Justiciary…..………….........................24 2.2: Jurisdiction……………………………………………………………….30 2.3: Crime and the Courts in Sixteenth-Century Scotland…….......................40 Chapter 3: The Family that Raids Together: Kindred, Border Crime and the Management of Female Criminals…………………..60 3.1: Family in Scotland………………………………………………………..61 3.2: The Family that Raids Together………………………………………….64 3.3: The Evidence of the High Court of Justiciary……………………………..68 3.4: Kinship and Justice in Scotland…...……………………………………...75
    [Show full text]
  • Rights of Audience - a Scottish Perspective
    Rights of Audience - A Scottish Perspective The Right Hon. Lord Rodger of Earlsferry* It is an honour for me to have been asked to give the Child & Co. lecture. When inviting me, Sir Nicholas Phillips suggested that any talk might relate to a difference between procedures in England and Scotland. It seemed to me that some discussion of rights of audience might be suitable, since the topic is not entirely free from controversy and a speaker from a Scottish background might be able at least to supplement your thinking on the subject. First, a few words of introduction or elementary vocabulary for those contemplating the mysteries of Scots Law for the first time. In Scotland we have solicitors who correspond to solicitors in England and Wales. Advocates are the Scottish equivalent of barristers and they are all members of the Scottish Bar or Faculty of Advocates. Until the legislation on the Scottish legal profession in the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1990 advocates had virtually exclusive rights of audience before the Scottish supreme courts - the Court of Session in civil matters (including appeals) and the High Court of Justiciary (hereafter the High Court) in criminal matters. Similarly advocates had virtually exclusive rights of audience along with barristers before the judicial committee of the House of Lords to which an appeal lies in civil matters. 1 Even though Part II of the 1990 Act contained no new term for solicitors who obtain rights of audience before the supreme courts, the Law Society's rules approved by the Lord President of the Court of Session2 used the unlovely term "solicitor advocate" and, while some advocates have protested about this terminology, I suspect that it is here to stay and shall use it for the sake of convenience.
    [Show full text]