Hepatic Metabolic Regulation by Nuclear Factor E4BP4
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
66 1 Journal of Molecular Z Zhao et al. E4BP4 regulates liver metabolic 66:1 R15–R21 Endocrinology processes REVIEW Hepatic metabolic regulation by nuclear factor E4BP4 Zifeng Zhao1,2, Lei Yin2, Feihua Wu1 and Xin Tong2 1Department of Pharmacology of Chinese Materia Medica, School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China 2Department of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Correspondence should be addressed to F Wu or X Tong: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract Discovered as a b-ZIP transcription repressor 30 years ago, E4 promoter-binding protein 4 Key Words (E4BP4) has been shown to play critical roles in immunity, circadian rhythms, and cancer f E4BP4 progression. Recent research has highlighted E4BP4 as a novel regulator of metabolisms f insulin in various tissues. In this review, we focus on the function and mechanisms of hepatic f lipid E4BP4 in regulating lipid and glucose homeostasis, bile metabolism, as well as xenobiotic f glucose metabolism. Finally, E4BP4-specific targets will be discussed for the prevention and f metabolism treatment of metabolic disorders. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2021) 66, R15–R21 Introduction The PAR proteins, named after the conserved proline- repressor with its repression activity primarily located and acid-rich (PAR) domains in a subset of basic leucine in its C-terminal region (Cowell & Hurst 1994) (Fig. 1). zipper (b-ZIP) transcription factors, consist of four family Although Northern blotting analysis indicates the E4bp4 members, TEF/VBP, HLF, DBP, and E4BP4 (Cowell & Hurst mRNA was ubiquitously expressed in various cell lines and 1994). The PAR family proteins form homodimers or mouse tissues, very low abundance of the E4BP4 protein hetero-dimerize within other family proteins and function was detected in most cases, suggesting that the E4BP4 as either transcription activators or repressors (Hai & protein level is likely controlled at both the translational Hartman 2001). The PAR family proteins have been found and post-translational levels (Chen et al. 1995). to have diverse physiological functions in mammals, One of the best-known biological functions of E4BP4 including circadian rhythms, immunoregulation, and is related to immunomodulation (Male et al. 2012). The cancer development (Green 2016). This review will focus E4bp4 promoter was found to be activated by interleukin on the role of E4 promoter-binding protein 4 (E4BP4), 3 in T lymphocytes, giving rise to its other name NF-IL3 also named as nuclear factor, interleukin 3 regulated (Zhang et al. 1995). Subsequently, multiple studies (NFIL3), the least known PAR transcription factor, in have illuminated the essential role of E4BP4 in NK cell liver metabolic regulation. NFIL3/E4BP4 was initially development/maturation as well as the development of cloned as a b-ZIP transcription factor that binds to the innate lymphoid cells (ILC) (Geiger et al. 2014). E4BP4 consensus sequence (G/A)T(G/T)A(C/T)GTAA(C/T) in the also functions as a key regulator of IL 3-dependent pro-B adenoviral E4 promoter DNA (Cowell et al. 1992). Further lymphocyte survival and immunoglobulin class switch analysis revealed that E4BP4 functions as a transcription (Ikushima et al. 1997). Moreover, E4BP4 was shown to https://jme.bioscientifica.com © 2021 Society for Endocrinology https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-20-0239 Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 10/01/2021 08:23:15AM via free access -20-0239 Journal of Molecular Z Zhao et al. E4BP4 regulates liver metabolic 66:1 R16 Endocrinology processes For instance, SREBP-1c, FXR, and ChREBP have been identified as critical transcription factors in lipid and bile acid biosynthesis during feeding (Chiang 2013, Wang et al. 2015), whereas FOXO1, CREB, and PPARα are Figure 1 required in gluconeogenesis and lipid oxidation during Schematic of E4BP4 functional domains. A full color version of this figure fasting (Rui 2014, Wang et al. 2016). Although the E4bp4 is available at https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-20-0239. expression was shown to be most abundant in the liver, regulate cytokine production and the effector functions the regulation of its mRNA by nutrients and hormone in a subsets of T lymphocytes (Kashiwada et al. 2011). signaling has been largely uncharacterized. Our lab has Given its broad actions in multiple immune cells, it discovered that refeeding induces the E4bp4 mRNA and was speculated that E4BP4 might be relevant in human protein in the mouse liver (Tong et al. 2010). We also immune disorders. Indeed, E4BP4 has been reported to be found that insulin potently induces E4bp4 expression implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD, MS, and systemic through the AKT/mTORC1/SREBP-1c pathway (Tong lupus erythematosis (Yin et al. 2017). et al. 2016). Most recently, we reported that chemical or As a protein wearing multiple hats, E4BP4 has also diet-induced ER stress potently induces hepatic E4BP4 to been identified as a key circadian output oscillator in the promote lipid accumulation via the suppression of AMPK molecular circadian clock system. In its core, the circadian pathway (Yang et al. 2020). Altogether, these data suggest clock comprises a transcription-translational feedback that E4BP4 could be a critical player during anabolic loop driven by key circadian proteins including BMAL1, metabolism. CLOCK, PERIOD, CRY, and nuclear receptors (NR1D1 and RORs) (Partch et al. 2014). The E4bp4 mRNA expression was E4BP4 in lipid metabolism shown to display a classical circadian oscillation pattern that was blunted in the Bmal1−/− mice, supporting that E4BP4 and FGF21-promoted fatty acid oxidation E4bp4 is a direct output gene of the molecular circadian During fasting, liver turns on lipolysis to break down clock (Chen et al. 2019b). E4BP4 was also found to triglycerides to release free fatty acids (FFAs) for fatty acid interact with the core clock protein CRY2 in cultured cells oxidation and ATP production inside the mitochondria (Ohno et al. 2007). However, deletion of E4bp4 showed (Rui 2014). The nuclear receptor PPARα plays a dominant little impact on the oscillations of core clock genes. Most role in activating fatty acid oxidation genes in the recently, the Lazar group has shown that the rhythmic liver during fasting (Bougarne et al. 2018). Pparα−/− expression of E4bp4 was disrupted in Kupffer cells from mice were shown to develop liver steatosis along with the liver of adult hepatocyte-specificRev- erbα and Rev-erbβ the suppression of FAO gene expression under food double knockout mice, highlighting an essential role of deprivation (Sugden et al. 2002, Lee et al. 2004, Bougarne the hepatic clock in coordinating metabolic events in the et al. 2018). One of the PPARα targets is FGF21, a hepatic liver (Guan et al. 2020). Given the extensive expression of hormone critical for energy mobilization during fasting E4BP4 in a variety of tissues, it is likely that E4BP4 may (Badman et al. 2007, Inagaki et al. 2007). Once released control a subset of circadian output genes in a tissue- from liver, FGF21 can stimulate adipocyte lipolysis in specific manner. white and brown adipose tissues and increase the levels of FFAs in circulation. We observed that E4BP4 represses the Fgf21 expression in a circadian fashion in hepatocytes. E4BP4 in liver metabolism The Fgf21 mRNA oscillations were anti-phase to those Liver is the central organ in charge of metabolic of E4bp4 during a circadian cycle in the mouse liver homeostasis in mammals. During the cycles of food (Tong et al. 2010). We also detected a drastic decrease in intake, liver turns on anabolic metabolism upon feeding the level of FGF21 in the medium from primary mouse and switches to catabolic metabolism during fasting (Rui hepatocytes transduced with Ad-E4bp4. Our chromatin 2014). This switch between different metabolic pathways immunoprecipitation (CHIP) assay uncovered the direct is tightly controlled at both the transcriptional and binding of E4BP4 to the Fgf21 promoter, consistent post-translational levels. A panel of transcription factors with its potent repression of the Fgf21 expression in sensitive to the nutrient status have been identified as hepatocytes. We further confirmed the physiological critical regulators in maintaining metabolic homeostasis role of E4BP4 as a suppressor of FGF21 in hepatocytes in the liver (Wang et al. 2016, Hatting et al. 2018). in response to insulin. Later on, we reported that G9a, https://jme.bioscientifica.com © 2021 Society for Endocrinology https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-20-0239 Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 10/01/2021 08:23:15AM via free access Journal of Molecular Z Zhao et al. E4BP4 regulates liver metabolic 66:1 R17 Endocrinology processes a histone methyl-transferase, is required to mediate E4BP4 in glucose metabolism the suppression of FGF21 by E4BP4 in hepatocytes Liver is also critical for maintaining glucose homeostasis (Tong et al. 2013). In contrast, CREBH, an ER-sensitive (Rui 2014). After food intake, liver synthesizes transcription factor, has been shown to facilitate the glycogen and inhibits gluconeogenesis. In contrast, PPARα-stimulated Fgf21 expression in the liver during liver undergoes glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis fasting (Zheng et al. 2016). The Zhang group reported to maintain blood glucose level during fasting. These that E4BP4 interacts with CREBH and antagonizes the metabolic processes are tightly controlled by a panel of CREBH-mediated activation of FGF21 in the liver (Zheng hormonal and nutritional signals (Rui 2014, Petersen et al. 2016, Bhattacharya et al. 2018). Collectively, these et al. 2017). Insulin promotes glycogen synthesis results suggest that E4BP4 might contribute to catabolism mainly by stimulating the phosphorylation of GSK3 of lipids by suppressing hepatic FGF21 in response to and inhibits gluconeogenesis by enhancing the FOXO1 insulin during feeding. phosphorylation (Lee & Dong 2017, Bergman et al.