Red Light Running in Iowa Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Red Light Running in Iowa Final Report RED LIGHT RUNNING IN IOWA: THE SCOPE, I MPACT, AND POSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS FINAL REPORT Sponsored by the Highway Division of the Iowa Department of Transportation CTRE Management Project 99-49 DECEMBER 2000 CTRE Center for Transportation Research and Education The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Iowa Department of Transportation. CTRE’s mission is to develop and implement innovative methods, materials, and technologies for improving transportation efficiency, safety, and reliability, while improving the learning environment of students, faculty, and staff in transportation-related fields. RED LIGHT RUNNING IN IOWA: THE SCOPE,IMPACT, AND POSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS FINAL REPORT Principal Investigator Ali Kamyab Co-Principal Investigator Tom McDonald Graduate Research Assistant Jason J. Stribiak Undergraduate Research Assistant Brandon Storm Editor Mark Anderson-Wilk Preparation of this report was financed in part through funds provided by the Iowa Department of Transportation through its research management agreement with the Center for Transportation Research and Education, CTRE Management Project 99-49 Center for Transportation Research and Education Iowa State University 2901 South Loop Drive, Suite 3100 Ames, Iowa 50010-8632 Telephone: 515-294-8103 Fax: 515-294-0467 http://www.ctre.iastate.edu December 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... ix 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Study Objectives ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Committee Contributions ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Report Organization ............................................................................................................. 2 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Automated Enforcement....................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Red Light Running Programs ............................................................................................... 4 2.3 Red Light Camera Systems .................................................................................................. 5 2.3.1 35 mm Wet Film ............................................................................................................ 8 2.3.1.1 Lockheed Martin...................................................................................................... 9 2.3.1.2 Aviar, Inc. .............................................................................................................. 12 2.3.1.3 American Traffic Systems ..................................................................................... 13 2.3.1.4 Electronic Data Systems ........................................................................................ 14 2.3.2 Digital Image Cameras................................................................................................. 14 2.3.2.1 RedFlex..................................................................................................................15 2.3.2.2 Driver Safety Systems Ltd. .................................................................................... 15 2.3.2.3 Tecnicon International, Inc. ................................................................................... 15 2.3.2.4 American Traffic Systems ..................................................................................... 15 2.3.2.5 Peek Traffic .......................................................................................................... 16 2.3.2.6 Roper Scientific, MASD (Kodak).......................................................................... 17 2.3.3 Video Cameras ............................................................................................................. 17 2.3.3.1 Nestor, Inc.............................................................................................................. 17 2.3.3.2 Monitron, Inc. ........................................................................................................ 18 2.3.3.3 ATD Northwest...................................................................................................... 18 2.3.3.4 Iteris (Odetics ITS) ................................................................................................ 19 2.4 Legislative Concerns ..........................................................................................................20 2.5 Red Light Running Countermeasures................................................................................. 21 2.5.1 Public Information/Education Campaigns ................................................................... 21 2.5.2 Signal Timing and Phasing Adjustments ..................................................................... 22 2.5.3 Upgrading of Signal Equipment................................................................................... 22 2.6 Summary............................................................................................................................. 23 3 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS............................................................................... 25 3.1 Signal Violation Data ......................................................................................................... 25 3.1.1 Camera Detection System ............................................................................................ 25 3.1.2 Detection Camera Selection......................................................................................... 26 3.1.3 Detection Camera Operations ...................................................................................... 26 3.1.4 Manual Data Extraction ............................................................................................... 29 3.1.5 Red Light Violation Data ............................................................................................. 30 3.2 Red Light Crash Data ......................................................................................................... 34 3.3 Surveys ............................................................................................................................... 36 iii &75(6XUYH\3URIHVVLRQDO*URXSV........................................................................... 36 81,6XUYH\*HQHUDO3RSXODWLRQ ............................................................................... 36 3.3.3 Survey Results..............................................................................................................37 3.4 Summary............................................................................................................................. 41 4 CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................... 43 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................ 45 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 47 APPENDIX A: SAMPLE CIVIL LEGISLATION ...................................................................... 51 APPENDIX B: OBSERVED VIDEOTAPED VIOLATION DATA .......................................... 61 APPENDIX C: GEOGRAPHICAL MAPS OF RAN-TRAFFIC-SIGNAL CRASHES.............. 69 APPENDIX D: CTRE SURVEY FORMS................................................................................... 79 APPENDIX E: CTRE SURVEY RESPONSE ANALYSIS ........................................................ 97 APPENDIX F: UNI SURVEY REPORT................................................................................... 115 APPENDIX G: CONTACTS...................................................................................................... 135 iv LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2.1 Data block................................................................................................................. 6 FIGURE 2.2 Camera housing........................................................................................................ 6 FIGURE 2.3 Straight view of license plate. .................................................................................. 7 FIGURE 2.4 Angle view of license plate. ..................................................................................... 7 FIGURE 2.5 First photographs...................................................................................................... 8 FIGURE 2.6 Second photograph. .................................................................................................. 8 FIGURE 3.1 Videotape output. ................................................................................................... 27 FIGURE 3.2 Bettendorf videotape output. .................................................................................. 27 FIGURE 3.3 Typical positions of cameras.................................................................................. 28 FIGURE 3.4 Camera placement on a street light mast arm........................................................
Recommended publications
  • SPR-550: the Impact of Red Light Cameras (Automated Enforcement)
    The Impact of Red Light Cameras (Automated Enforcement) on Safety in Arizona Final Report 550 Prepared by: Dr. Simon Washington and Mr. Kangwon Shin 2004 E 5th St Tucson, AZ 85719 June 2005 Prepared for: Arizona Department of Transportation 206 South 17th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007 in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration The contents of the report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trade or manufacturers’ names which may appear herein are cited only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the report. The U.S. Government and the State of Arizona do not endorse products or manufacturers. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-AZ-05-550 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Impact of Red Light Cameras (Automated Enforcement) on August 2005 Safety in Arizona 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report No. Dr. Simon Washington and Mr. Kangwon Shin 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Dr. Simon Washington and Mr. Kangwon Shin University of Arizona 11. Contract or Grant No. Tucson, AZ 85721 SPR-PL-1-(61) 550 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13.Type of Report & Period Covered ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 206 S.
    [Show full text]
  • PART FOUR — TRAFFIC CODE Title III — Streets and Traffic Control Devices
    PART FOUR — TRAFFIC CODE Title III — Streets And Traffic Control Devices Chapter 411 — Street Obstructions and Special Uses Complete to June 30, 2010 CROSS REFERENCES See sectional histories for similar State law. Power to regulate processions or assemblages, RC 4511.07 Dropping, sifting and leaking loads, CO 439.11 411.01 Placing Injurious Material or Obstruction in Street (a) No person shall place or knowingly drop upon any part of a highway, lane, road, street, or alley any tacks, bottles, wire, glass, nails or other articles which may damage or injure any person, vehicle or animal traveling along or upon such street, except such substances that may be placed upon the roadway by proper authorities for the repair or construction thereof. (b) Any person who drops or permits to be dropped or thrown upon any street any noxious, destructive or injurious material shall immediately remove the same. (c) Any person authorized to remove a wrecked or damaged vehicle from a street shall remove any glass or other injurious substance dropped upon the street from such vehicle. (d) No person shall place any obstruction in or upon a street without proper authority. (e) No person, with intent to cause physical harm to a person or a vehicle, shall place or knowingly drop upon any part of a highway, lane, road, street or alley any tacks, bottles, wire, glass, nails or other articles which may damage or injure any person, vehicle or animal traveling along or upon such highway, except such substances that may be placed upon the roadway by proper authority for the repair or construction thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Light Camera Ticket California
    Red Light Camera Ticket California Assorted Alfonse speans dazedly and asleep, she rackets her ephemerons twitch regularly. Darien never trend any Karamanlis rush assuredly, is Scarface determinable and flappy enough? Unperceivable and castled Chet assembled almost uxorially, though Norman mythicizes his poisoners exceed. If the image used to issue you the citation is not clear at all or is questionable, this evidence may have to be dismissed, invalidating the case against you. The drivers think he only one of red light camera ticket in crashes associated with varying success, depending on a regulated activity, implementing and solana beach. GC Services in Los Angeles County. Let us a red? Kyrychenko developed from yellow and local businesses that use camera and california red light camera ticket is backing off. The ticket without having your identity of tickets throughout california cities getting a rlc there? Are not available to leading cause of your defense can easily locate your driving, when you are! Provided for any earlier this also be flagged by california red? The camera enforcement camera program. For anyone seeking legal counsel. You run red flag with little revenue are agreeing to california red flex, but what can. Farmer of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Any case results presented on the guide are based upon the facts of a rifle case and do not represent the promise or guarantee. For a friend, this question or is reviewed by police department confirms, depending on commonly get quite expensive is not practice of map provided. However, several are young few measures you our take would reduce the fabric of being forced to late to impose fine.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Law Enforcement: a Review of the Literature
    MONASH UNIVERSITY TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE by Dominic Zaal April 1994 Report No. 53 This project was undertaken by Dominic Zaal of the Federal Office of Road Safety, Department of Transport while on secondment to the Monash University Accident Research Centre. The research was carried out during an overseas consignment for the Institute of Road Safety Research (SWOV), Leidschendam, The Netherlands. ACCIDENT RESEARCH CENTRE MONASH UNIVERSITY ACCIDENT RESEARCH CENTRE REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Report No. Date ISBN Pages 53 April 1994 0 7326 0052 9 212 Title and sub-title: Traffic Law Enforcement: A review of the literature Author(s): Zaal, D Sponsoring Organisation(s): Institute for Road Safety Research (SWOV) PO Box 170 2260 AD Leidschendam The Netherlands Abstract: A study was undertaken to review the recent Australian and international literature relating to traffic law enforcement. The specific areas examined included alcohol, speed, seat belts and signalised intersections. The review documents the types of traffic enforcement methods and the range of options available to policing authorities to increase the overall efficiency (in terms of cost and human resources) and effectiveness of enforcement operations. The review examines many of the issues related to traffic law enforcement including the deterrence mechanism, the effectiveness of legislation and the type of legal sanctions administered to traffic offenders. The need to use enforcement in conjunction with educational and environmental/engineering strategies is also stressed. The use of educational programs and measures targeted at modifying the physical and social environment is also briefly reviewed. The review highlights the importance of developing enforcement strategies designed to maximise deterrence whilst increasing both the perceived and actual probability of apprehension.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Solana Beach) To: Citation Processing Center, P
    CITATION / TICKET INFORMATION (page 1 of 2) GENERAL INFORMATION: You may obtain more information regarding a citation by calling 1-800-989-2058. The City’s parking regulations are outlined under Title 10, Chapters 10.28 and 10.32 of the Municipal Code. The Municipal Code is available at City Hall for public viewing or can be accessed online at www.cityofsolanabeach.org PAYMENTS: Payment for tickets is not accepted at City Hall. Citations should be paid by mail, sending the proper penalty amount in Money Order or Check (payable to the City of Solana Beach) to: Citation Processing Center, P. O. Box 2730, Huntington Beach, CA 92647-2730. Please do not send cash. Enclose the notice of parking violation with your payment and/or proof of correction. Payment by credit card may be made online at www.citationprocessingcenter.com or by calling 1-800-989-2058. APPEALS or REQUESTS FOR REVIEW: Appeals are not accepted at City Hall. All citation appeals are handled in writing, with a written explanation and request for administrative review sent to: Citation Processing Center, P.O. Box 2730, Huntington Beach, CA 92647-2730. TICKET Corrections / Sign-Off: - Correctable Violations (Registration, License Plates) may be corrected by the City’s Code Compliance Officer (858- 720-2412) or San Diego County Sheriff’s Department. - Disabled Person Parking Placard: This is no longer a correctable offense, therefore sign-offs can no longer be issued by the issuing officer. You may elect to send copies of documents to the ticket vendor (DataTicket, information on back of tickets) for their consideration of waiving the ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Red Light Violation Data Collected from Intersections Equipped with Red Light Photo Enforcement Cameras
    DOT HS 810 580 March 2006 Analysis of Red Light Violation Data Collected from Intersections Equipped with Red Light Photo Enforcement Cameras Research and Innovative Technology Administration Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. ii Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average one hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 2006 Project Memorandum October 2003 – October 2005 shes 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Analysis of Red Light Violation Data Collected from Intersections Equipped with Red Light Photo Enforcement Cameras PPA # HS-19 6. AUTHOR(S) C. Y. David Yang and Wassim G. Najm . 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8.PERFORMING ORGANIZATION U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE of CONTENTS Page TITLE III. TRAFFIC CODE
    TITLE III – TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE III. TRAFFIC CODE ................................................................................................3.1 CHAPTER 301: GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................3.1 Section 3.1 Definitions........................................................................................3.1 CHAPTER 302: TRAFFIC ADMINISTRATION .....................................................................3.4 Section 3.2 Records Of Traffic Violations .........................................................3.4 Section 3.3 Police Department To Investigate Accidents ...................................3.5 Section 3.4 Traffic Accident Reports..................................................................3.5 Section 3.5 Police Department To Submit Annual Traffic Safety Report ..........3.5 Section 3.6 Emergency And Experimental Regulations .....................................3.5 CHAPTER 303: ENFORCEMENT AND OBEDIENCE TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS .................3.6 Section 3.7 Authority Of Police Department Officials .......................................3.6 Section 3.8 Obedience To Police Department Officials .....................................3.6 Section 3.9 Persons Propelling Pushcarts Or Riding Animals To Obey Traffic Regulations ..........................................................................3.6 Section 3.10 Use Of Coasters, Roller Skates And Similar Devices Restricted .........................................................................................3.6
    [Show full text]
  • Pueblo Traffic Code
    PUEBLO TRAFFIC CODE A compilation of the 1995 edition of the Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities and amendments made by the City of Pueblo Published by COLORADO CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 323 West Drake Road, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80526-8115 (800) 352-9229 ♦ (970) 498-9229 [email protected] ♦ www.colocode.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 of Title XV, Pueblo Municipal Code Sec. 15-1-1 Adoption of Model Traffic Code; deletions Sec. 15-1-2 Applicability of Chapter in Pueblo Memorial Airport Sec. 15-1-3 Applicability of Chapter in Pueblo Mountain Park Sec. 15-1-4 Airport traffic; enforcement of laws; section added Sec. 15-1-5 Park traffic; enforcement of laws Sec. 15-1-6 Penalties for violations of this Chapter Sec. 15-1-7 Parking on private property; burden of proof Sec. 15-1-8 Amendments and additions Sec. 15-1-9 Drag racing; speed or acceleration exhibit Sec. 15-1-10 Motorized vehicles in certain areas Sec. 15-1-11 Parking meter tokens; sale; distribution Sec. 15-1-12 Reserved Sec. 15-1-13 School crossing guard program Sec. 15-1-14 Reserved Sec. 15-1-15 Owner liability for traffic signal camera violations Pueblo Traffic Code Article I Part 1 Traffic Regulation - Generally 101 102 103 Scope and effect of Model Traffic Code - exceptions to provisions 104 105 Local traffic control devices 106 Who may restrict right to use highways 107 Obedience to police officers 108 Public officers to obey provisions - exceptions for emergency vehicles 109 Motorized bicycles, animals, skis, skates, toy vehicles, and all-terrain recreational vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Code
    TITLE VII: TRAFFIC CODE Chapter 70. GENERAL PROVISIONS 71. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 72. PARKING REGULATIONS 73. TRAFFIC SCHEDULES 74. PARKING SCHEDULES 1 2 Princeville - Traffic Code CHAPTER 70: GENERAL PROVISIONS Section General Provisions 70.01 Definitions 70.02 Funeral processions 70.03 Bicycles, toy vehicles, and the like Registration; License Tax 70.15 Registration of resident motor vehicles; payment of license tax 70.16 Registration deadline; period of registration 70.17 Operation of a motor vehicle without registration plate unlawful 70.99 General traffic penalty GENERAL PROVISIONS § 70.01 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this title, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning. ADMINISTRATOR. The Public Works Director or any other person designated by the Manager to perform the functions assigned by this title to the Administrator. Whenever this title authorizes or requires the ADMINISTRATOR to install a traffic-control device controlling parking or regulating the movement of traffic on, to, or from a state highway system street and the installation of such a device is in practice a function of the State Department of Transportation, the Administrator may discharge his or her responsibility by requesting the State Department of Transportation to install such device. DRIVER. The operator of a vehicle as defined in this section. The terms DRIVER and OPERATOR and their cognates are synonymous. 3 4 Princeville - Traffic Code HIGHWAY or STREET. The entire width between property or right-of-way lines of every way or place of whatever nature, when any part thereof is open to the use of the public as a matter of right for the purposes of vehicular traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Flags Fly on Red-Light Cameras | Watchdog Column | DFW I
    Watchdog: Red flags fly on red-light cameras | Watchdog Column | DFW I... http://www.dallasnews.com/investigations/watchdog/20150122-watchdog... ePaper Subscribe Sign In Home News Business Sports Entertainment Arts & Life Opinion Obits Marketplace DMNstore Communities Crime Education Investigations State Nation/World Politics Videos Photos 92° 7-day Forecast Follow Us Watchdog Watchdog: Red flags fly on red-light cameras Share Tweet Email 38 Comment Print Dave Lieber Watchdog Published: 22 January 2015 11:10 PM Updated: 24 March 2015 12:47 PM I nearly fell out of my chair reading a recent interview with the head of the red-light camera company that provides the flashing contraptions to cities such as Allen, Coppell, Denton, Grand Prairie, Mesquite, Plano, Richardson and University Park. In a column by Holman W. Jenkins Jr. of The Wall Street Journal , here’s the paragraph that stunned me: “As for a universal peeve of motorists, being fined for a harmless rolling right on red, Mr. [Jim] Saunders suggests jurisdictions refrain from issuing a ticket except when a pedestrian is in the crosswalk.” I read that again. The head of Redflex Traffic Systems is urging the hundreds of cities that use his red-light cameras to lighten up on the easiest way these cities make their money: rolling right on red, creeping around the corner when no people or cars are in sight, triggering a white flash of light that costs a $75 civil fine. I didn’t realize the red-light traffic camera industry was in such trouble that the head of one of the dominant companies is urging its customers to be nice.
    [Show full text]
  • Part Three - Traffic Code
    PART THREE - TRAFFIC CODE TITLE ONE - Administration, Enforcement and Penalties Chapter 301 Definitions Chapter 303 Enforcement; Impounding Chapter 305 Traffic Control Chapter 307 Traffic Control Map and File Chapter 309 Penalties TITLE THREE - Public Ways and Traffic Control Devices Chapter 311 Obstruction and Special Uses of Public Ways Chapter 313 Traffic Control Devices TITLE FIVE - Vehicles and Operation Chapter 331 Operation Generally Chapter 333 DWI; Reckless Operation; Speed Chapter 335 Licensing; Accidents Chapter 337 Safety and Equipment Chapter 339 Commercial and Heavy Vehicles Chapter 341 Drivers of Commercial Cars or Tractors Chapter 343 [Reserved] Chapter 345 Noise Emission From Motor Vehicles TITLE SEVEN - Parking Chapter 351 Parking Generally Chapter 353 Parking Meters TITLE NINE - Pedestrians, Bicycles, Motorcycles and Snowmobiles Chapter 371 Pedestrians Chapter 373 Bicycles and Motorcycles Chapter 375 Bicycle Licensing (REPEALED 11-22-2010; Ord. 2010-108) Chapter 377 Snowmobiles and All Purpose Vehicles PART THREE - TRAFFIC CODE TITLE ONE - Administration, Enforcement and Penalties Chapter 301 Definitions Chapter 303 Enforcement; Impounding Chapter 305 Traffic Control Chapter 307 Traffic Control Map and File Chapter 309 Penalties CHAPTER 301: DEFINITIONS Section 301.01 Meaning of words and phrases 301.02 Agricultural tractor 301.03 Alley 301.04 Bicycle 301.05 Bus 301.06 Business district; Downtown business district 301.07 Commercial tractor 301.08 Controlled-access highway 301.09 Crosswalk 301.10 Driver or operator 301.11
    [Show full text]
  • TRAFFIC CODE (As Amended August 27, 2003)
    WINNEBAGO TRIBAL CODE TITLE 6 TITLE 6 CIVIL TRAFFIC CODE (As amended August 27, 2003) SUMMARY OF CONTENTS SECTION ARTICLE-PAGE 1. TABLE OF REVISIONS ii 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS iii 3. ARTICLE 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1-1 4. ARTICLE 2: PROCEDURES 2-1 5. ARTICLE 3: LICENSING, REGISTRATION AND VEHICLE 3-1 REQUIREMENTS 6. ARTICLE 4: MOVING TRAFFIC 4-1 7. ARTICLE 5: NON-MOVING TRAFFIC 5-1 8. ARTICLE 6: HIGHWAYS, ROADS AND BRIDGES 6-1 9. ARTICLE 7: VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC SAFETY 7-1 10. ARTICLE 8: MISCELLANEOUS 8-1 i December 2015 WINNEBAGO TRIBAL CODE TITLE 6 TITLE 6 TABLE OF REVISIONS The following table is included in this title as a guide for determining whether each article properly reflects the current version. This table will be updated with the revision of each article. Through usage and supplementation, pages in bound titles can be inserted and removed when sections are revised on an article-by-article basis. This table should be placed before the Table of Contents in the title. The “Article” column lists each article, and the “Section” column lists any corresponding sections that have been revised, in sequence. The “Revised Date” column reflects the effective date of the revision (e.g., “6/20/15”). If an article is not listed in the table, it has not been revised since the December 2015 Winnebago Tribal Code update and distribution. Article Section Revised Date ii December 2015 WINNEBAGO TRIBAL CODE TITLE 6 TITLE 6 CIVIL TRAFFIC CODE (As amended August 27, 2003) ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 6-101 Purpose.
    [Show full text]