DOCSLIB.ORG

High Level Options Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High Level Options Report Town Planning Submitted to Submitted by Shepway District Council AECOM Aldgate Tower 2 Leman Street London E1 8FA High Level Options Report Shepway District Growth Options Study December 2016 Final Report AECOM 1-1 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.1 Project context .............................................................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.2 Project objectives and structure ................................................................................................................................... 1-5 2 Approach ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.1 Summary of methodology............................................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.2 Key spatial planning principles ..................................................................................................................................... 2-9 3 Evidence base review ....................................................................................................................................................... 3-14 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 3-14 3.2 Character area-based approach ................................................................................................................................. 3-14 3.3 Evidence base by sub-area ........................................................................................................................................ 3-17 3.4 Environmental constraints .......................................................................................................................................... 3-17 3.5 Transport and accessibility ......................................................................................................................................... 3-24 3.6 Geo-environmental considerations ............................................................................................................................. 3-24 3.7 Infrastructure capacity and potential ........................................................................................................................... 3-26 3.8 Landscape and topography ........................................................................................................................................ 3-27 3.9 Heritage considerations .............................................................................................................................................. 3-27 3.10 Housing demand ........................................................................................................................................................ 3-29 3.11 Regeneration potential ............................................................................................................................................... 3-32 3.12 Economic development potential ................................................................................................................................ 3-34 3.13 Spatial opportunities and constraints .......................................................................................................................... 3-34 3.14 Traffic light assessment of criteria .............................................................................................................................. 3-34 3.15 Technical consultation ................................................................................................................................................ 3-37 3.16 Area 1 (Kent Downs) .................................................................................................................................................. 3-39 3.17 Area 2 (Folkestone and Surrounding Area) ................................................................................................................ 3-47 3.18 Area 3 (Hythe and Surrounding Area) ........................................................................................................................ 3-56 3.19 Area 4 (Sellindge and Surrounding Area) ................................................................................................................... 3-64 3.20 Area 5 (Romney Marsh and Walland Marsh) ............................................................................................................. 3-73 3.21 Area 6 (Lydd, New Romney and Dungeness) ............................................................................................................ 3-82 3.22 Evidence gaps ............................................................................................................................................................ 3-91 4 Stakeholder Workshop ..................................................................................................................................................... 4-92 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 4-92 4.2 Table exercise ............................................................................................................................................................ 4-92 4.3 Using workshop outputs ........................................................................................................................................... 4-101 5 Development of High Level Options ............................................................................................................................. 5-102 5.1 Bringing together the data ........................................................................................................................................ 5-102 5.2 Emerging results ...................................................................................................................................................... 5-102 5.3 High-level options for growth .................................................................................................................................... 5-109 5.4 Next steps ................................................................................................................................................................ 5-109 6 Technical Appendices .................................................................................................................................................... 6-110 6.1 Appendix A: Review of national and local planning policy ........................................................................................ 6-110 Appendix B: Review of relevant evidence base documents ........................................................................................... 6-122 December 2016 AECOM 1-2 Appendix C: Letter and pro-forma sent to national stakeholders ........................................................................................... 6-133 Appendix D: Response from national and sub-regional stakeholders ................................................................................... 6-136 Limitations AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Shepway District Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. Where the conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others it is upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by AECOM has not been independently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken in the period October 2016 to December 2016 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. AECOM disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to AECOM’s attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward- looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward- looking statements by their nature involve risks and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archaeology and the Channel Tunnel
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society \\N& / / \X // A / d ^§r ASHFORD f\ s^ >\V I Farthingloe Farm f XpO©? / Construction ^Jt > / J camp s*\s*s%2r ^.jg£z Ashford Terminal \. "^>^—""'** ^^00-Shakespeare Zliff ^—«^^ —-•-^~~Z£Z^'^ Platform j^^. Tumuli} \ * A ^" \ FolkestoneTerminal.. «/-^v\ A^/X^-^U^ ^>*iBB=T 1~^ ^==^^2^^^^^^)^:^^^^^W5£yroA/ / AjJ/w^ Dolland's Moor ( S^^s/^^^^t^^/V^ , / 1 ,t>/a//7 7 ( ' 7y^y&.J Ur \ / \ ^ j (_J? J^S ^^^FOLKESTONE j \ y ^ ^^^^hYTHE 0 1 5 mites \V 0 1 5 kilometres Fig. 1. Location of the Ashford, Folkestone and Dover construction areas. ARCHAEOLOGY A N D T H E C H A N N E L T U N N E L PAUL BENNETT with contributions from Rupert Austin, Greg Campbell, Richard Cross, Alex Gibson, Elizabeth Healey, Martin Leyland, Steve Ouditt, Richard Preece, Jonathan Rady and Steve Staines INTRODUCTION Three separate construction areas have received attention from the Canterbury Archaeological Trust: Ashford, where the inland freight clearance depot has been built; Dover, where a construction camp, offices, working areas and a shaft leading down to the tunnel have been constructed; and Folkestone, where the main U.K. terminal facilities, the tunnel portals and a length of 'cut-and-cover' tunnel are presently under construction. Negotiations with Eurotunnel for archaeological work connected with this, the largest ever privately-funded civil engineering venture in Europe, began at an early stage in the life of the project. A document containing all known information regarding sites of archaeological interest was prepared by English Heritage (November 1986)1 and these designated areas were assessed in the field during July and August 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • Newington Parish Council AGENDA
    Newington Parish Council Notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Parish Council will be held remotely using Zoom on Monday 16 November 2020 commencing at 7.00pm. Members of the public who may like to join the meeting should contact the Clerk [email protected] for joining instructions AGENDA 1 To record those Present and list any Apologies 2 To declare any Disclosable Pecuniary Interests (DPI) and Other Significant Interests (OSI) relating to items on the agenda. 3 Co-option To consider applications for the office of Parish Councillor and to co-opt a candidate to fill the existing vacancy. 4 Agree and sign the Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on the 24th August 2020 (circulated previously) 5 Matters arising from the previous minutes 6 Open session Questions from Parishioners 7 Report from KCC Councillor Susan Carey 8 Report from Folkestone and Hythe District Councillor David Godfrey 9 Report from Community Warden Gary Harrison 10 Standing Orders To carry out the annual review of the Council’s Standing Orders 11 Planning To note applications and decisions received since the last meeting: a. 20/1175/FH: 2 Bargrove Farm, Bargrove, Newington, CT18 8BH (listed building consent) Proposal: To replace existing wooden framed windows and doors with UPVC Status: Under Consultation b. 20/1213/FH: Channel Tunnel Terminal, Ashford Road, Newington, Folkestone, CT18 8XX Proposal: Submission under Channel Tunnel Act 1987 for approval of a con- nector road at Beachborough Slip to enable emergency exiting of vehicles Status: Approved c. 20/1014/FH: Frogholt Manor, Frogholt, Folkestone, CT18 8AT Proposal: Erection of pre-fabricated single storey outbuilding Status: Approved d.
    [Show full text]
  • North Downs East North Downs East
    Cheriton Shepway Ward Profile May 2015 North Downs East North Downs East -2- North Downs East Brief introduction to area ..............................................................................4 Map of area ......................................................................................................5 Demographic ...................................................................................................6 Local economy ................................................................................................9 Transport .......................................................................................................13 Education and skills .................................................................................... 14 Health & wellbeing .......................................................................................16 Housing ..........................................................................................................21 Neighbourhood/community ......................................................................23 Planning & Development ...........................................................................24 Physical Assets .............................................................................................25 Arts and culture .......................................................................................... 29 Crime ........................................................................................................... 30 Endnotes/websites .......................................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRYSIDE Page 1 of 16
    Page 1 of 16 COUNTRYSIDE Introduction 12.1 Shepway has a rich and diverse landscape ranging from the rolling chalk downland and dry valleys of the North Downs, through the scarp and dip slope of the Old Romney Shoreline, to Romney Marsh and the unique shingle feature of the Dungeness peninsula. This diversity is reflected in the range of Natural Areas and Countryside Character Areas, identified by English Nature and the Countryside Agency respectively, which cover the District. The particular landscape and wildlife value of large parts of the District is also recognised through protective countryside designations, including Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Heritage Coastline, as well as the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The countryside also plays host to a wide range of activities and it is recognised that the health of the rural economy and the health of the countryside are inter-linked. A function of the Local Plan is to achieve a sustainable pattern of development in the countryside. This involves a balance between the needs of rural land users and maintaining and enhancing countryside character and quality. 12.2 This balance is achieved in two main ways:- a. By focussing most development in urban areas, particularly on previously developed sites and ensuring that sufficient land is allocated to meet identified development requirements, thus reducing uncertainty and speculation on ‘greenfield’ sites in the countryside. b. By making firm policy statements relating to: the general principles to be applied to all proposals in the countryside; specific types of development in the countryside; and the protection of particularly important areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Details Are Intended to Give a Fair Description and Give Guidance to Prospective Purchasers
    The Palm Tree Inn, Wingmore, Elham, Canterbury, Kent CT4 6LP A detached grade II listed former Coaching Inn dating back to 1725, situated in the picturesque Elham valley between Elham and Barham. The property sits in approximately 2/3 of an acre and comprises five bedrooms, and three reception rooms. Outside there is a garage, gravelled drive for many vehicles, gardens, courtyard, and sun terrace. Set in an area of outstanding natural beauty with stunning countryside views. Could be used as a house with an annexe. Guide Price £525,000 Your Local Agent Guide Price £525,000 Situation The Palm Tree Inn is located along the Elham Valley, within the small dispersed hamlet of Wingmore. The surrounding countryside is designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and there are a wealth of footpaths and cycle roots leading away from the property, including the popular Elham Valley Way. The nearby charming village of Elham is just over 2 miles away and boasts a range of local shops, pubs and amenities such as a primary school and doctors' surgery. There is a thriving sense of community with the Village Hall being the central point for many local clubs and societies. There is also a regular farmers market held in the centre of the village that showcases local produce. The property is situated between Canterbury, 11 miles and Folkestone, 10 miles, with their excellent shopping centres, choice of schools and recreational opportunities. It is also well placed for access to the M20, 8 miles and A2/M2, 3miles. For cross Channel services, the port of Dover, Eurotunnel Terminal at Folkestone and Ashford International for Eurostar are nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • Shepway Local Development Framework Green Infrastructure Report
    EB 08.20 Shepway Local Development Framework Green Infrastructure Report Elham Park Wood Shepway Green Infrastructure Report July 2011 1 Contents 1. Green Infrastructure - definitions 2. Components of GI 3. Functions and benefits of GI 4. GI policy context 5. The GI resource in Shepway 6. Biodiversity GI in Shepway 7. Linear Feature GI 8. Civic Amenity GI 9. Key issues and opportunities in relation to strategic development sites Shepway Green Infrastructure Report July 2011 2 1. Green Infrastructure - definitions 1.1 A number of definitions of Green Infrastructure (GI) are in use including:- PPS12 – “…a network of multi-functional green space, both new and existing, both rural and urban, which supports the natural and ecological processes and is integral to the health and quality of life of sustainable communities.” 1.2 South East Plan/South East GI Partnership – “For the purposes of spatial planning the term green infrastructure (GI) relates to the active planning and management of sub-regional networks of multi-functional open space. These networks should be managed and designed to support biodiversity and wider quality of life, particularly in areas undergoing large scale change.“ 1.3 Natural England – “Green Infrastructure (GI) is a strategically planned and delivered network of high quality green spaces and other environmental features. It should be designed and managed as a multifunctional resource capable of delivering a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities. Green Infrastructure includes parks, open spaces, playing fields, woodlands, allotments and private gardens.” 1.4 The common features of these definitions are that GI:- • involves natural and managed green areas in urban and rural settings • is about the strategic connection of open green areas • should provide multiple benefits for people 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Waterspout on the Cheviots—Broken Peat-Bed. British Rainfall, 1893
    THE WATERSPOUT ON THE CHEVIOTS—BROKEN PEAT-BED. BRITISH RAINFALL, 1893. LONDON: C SHIELD, PRINTER, 4, LEETE STREET, CHELSEA ; & LANCELOT PLACE, BIlOMVTON. 1894. BRITISH RAINFALL, 1893. THE DISTRIBUTION OF UAIN OVEE THE BRITISH ISLES, DURING THE YE1R 1893, AS OBSERVED AT NEARLY 3000 STATIONS IN GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND, WITH ARTICLES UPON VARIOUS BRANCHES OF RAINFALL WORK. COMPILED BY G. J. SYMONS, F.R.S., CHEVALIER DE LA LTSGION D'HONNEUR, Secretary Royal Meteorological Society; Membredu Conseil Societe Meteorologique de France. Member Scottish Meteorological Society ; Korrespondirendes Mitglied der Deutschen Meteorologischen Gesellschaft; Registrar of Sanitary Institute ; Fellow Royal Colonial Institute ; Membre correspondant etranger Soc. Royale de Medecine Publique de JleJgique, Socio correspondiente Sociedad Cientifica Antonio Alzate, Mexico, $c. AND H. SOWERBY WALLIS, F.R.MetSoc. LONDON: EDWARD STANFORD, COCKSPUR STREET, S.W 1894. CONTENTS. PAGE PREFACE ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... 7 REPORT—PUBLICATIONS—OLD OBSERVATIONS—FIXANCE ... ... ... .. 8 THE WATERSPOUT (OR CLOUD BURST) ON THE CHEVIOTS ... ... ... ... 14 HEAVY FALLS OF RAIN AT CAMDEN SQUARE, 1858—1894 ... ... ... ... 18 EXPERIMENTS ox EVAPORATION AT SOUTHAMPTON WATER WORKS AND AT CAMDEN SQUARE ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... 23 COMPARISON OF GERMAN AND ENGLISH RAIN GAUGES AND OF MR. SIDEBOTTOM'S Sxo\v GAUGE ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 27 RAINFALL AT THE ROYAL OBSERVATORY, GREENWICH ... ... ... ... 30 THE STAFF OF OBSERVERS... ... ..
    [Show full text]
  • 7.4 Strategic Options Report
    DOCUMENT 7.4 Strategic Options Report National Grid (Richborough Connection Project) Order Regulation 5(2)(q) of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 and TEN-E Regulation EU347/2013 First published June 2013 Application Ref: EN020017 January 2016 Richborough Connection Project Strategic Options Report for the South East Region June 2013 Issue 1 National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 2 Background................................................................................................ 7 3 Summary of the Need Case.........................................................................11 4 New Transmission Routes - National Grid’s Approach......................................14 5 Potential Strategic Options Identified for the Richborough Connection ..............20 6 Appraisal of Strategic Option 1 – Richborough to Canterbury North (onshore) ...27 7 Appraisal of Strategic Option 2 – Richborough to Cleve Hill (onshore)...............37 8 Appraisal of Strategic Option 3 – Richborough to Kemsley (onshore) ................48 9 Appraisal of Strategic Option 4 – Richborough to Cleve Hill (offshore)...............59 10 Appraisal of Strategic Option 5 – Richborough to Sellindge (offshore) ...........64 11 Appraisal of Strategic Option 6 – Richborough to Kemsley (offshore) ............70 12 Conclusions ...........................................................................................75
    [Show full text]
  • Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy DOCUMENT NAME
    PROJECT: Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy DOCUMENT NAME: Volume 1 – Main Strategy Combined Version Status Prepared by Date V01 DRAFT INITIAL Simon Mason 17/11/17 COMBINATION V02 INITIAL EDIT FOR Simon Mason 21/11/17 CIRCULATION TO SDC AND COMMENT V03 SECOND EDIT RICH Simon Mason 28/11/17 HERITAGE ADDED V04 REVISED FOLLOWING Simon Mason 27/3/2018 DW COMMENTS V05 REVISED CHAPTERS 8 Simon Mason 22/6/18 & 9 ADDED V06 Tracked Changes from David Whittington 19/11/18 F&HDC V07 KCC Check and edit Simon Mason 26/11/18 following F&HDC changes V08 F&HDC Adrian Toft Adrian Toft 27/11/18 Comments Version Status Prepared by Date V09 Consultation Copy Simon Mason 27/11/18 Final edit pre consultation for Cabinet Submission Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy Contents Main Document 1 Introduction to the Heritage Strategy 2 The District's Rich Heritage 3 Heritage Assets 4 Heritage Themes 5 Heritage Activity in the Folkestone & Hythe District 6 Opportunities - Making the Most of the District's Heritage 7 Vulnerability of the Heritage Assets 8 Stakeholder Engagement 9 Taking the Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy Forward 10 Sources and Consultation Annex 1 Heritage Assets Appendices 1 Theme Papers 2 Case Studies 3 Activities in Folkestone & Hythe District 4 SHLAA Assessment 1 Introduction to the Heritage Strategy 1.1 Folkestone & Hythe District is the most southern local authority in Kent and its longest standing administrative unit. It extends from the hills and valleys of the North Kent Downs in the north, through the Greensand Vale (an area that includes the Greensand Ridge and Holmesdale) and southwards onto the Romney Marsh and the Dungeness shingle spit.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebbsfleet Style
    Appendix 2 List of HS1 Section 1 digital reports The OrganisatiOn and cOmpOnent parts Of the HS1 analysis and Leda COttages, AshfOrd, Kent, CTRL integrated site report repOrting structure have been described in Chapter 1. Presented series , in ADS 2006 here is a full list Of the HS1 SectiOn 1 digital repOrts that have Diez, V, 2006b The ROman settlement at BOwer ROad, Smeeth, been depOsited with the ArchaeOlOgy Data Service (ADS). The Kent, CTRL integrated site report series , in ADS 2006 ADS uses the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) System fOr Diez, V, 2006c The late prehistOric and ROman landscape at uniquely identifying its digital cOntent, which are persistent Snarkhurst WOOd, MaidstOne, Kent, CTRL integrated site identifiers used tO cOnsistently and accurately reference digital report series , in ADS 2006 Objects and/Or cOntent. The HS1 (fOrmerly knOwn as CTRL) GOllOp, A, 2006 The late IrOn Age and medieval landscape tO archive has the fOllOwing DOI: the nOrth Of Westenhanger Castle, StanfOrd, Kent, CTRL integrated site report series , in ADS 2006 ADS 2006 COllectiOn: 335 dOi:10.5284/1000230 Hayden, C, 2006a The prehistOric landscape at White HOrse http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalOgue/prOjArch/ctrl StOne, AylesfOrd, Kent, CTRL integrated site report series , in ADS 2006 Hayden, C, 2006b The prehistOric landscape at EyhOrne Part 1: Printed interim publications Street, HOllingbOurne, Kent, CTRL integrated site report series , in ADS 2006 Glass, H, 2000 The Channel Tunnel Rail Link, Current Helm, R, 2006 Medieval irOnwOrking evidence frOm
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Rare Plant Register Draft Species Accounts C (Second Part: Ce-Cy)
    1 Kent Rare Plant Register Draft species accounts C (second part: Ce-Cy) Compiled by Geoffrey Kitchener and the Kent Botanical Recording Group Issue date: February 2016 2 Kent rare plant register This section of the register covers: In Part Ca: Carex lepidocarpa Centunculus minimus Chenopodium vulvaria Callitriche truncata Carex nigra Cephalanthera Cichorum intybus Calystegia soldanella Carex panicea damasonium Cicuta virosa Campanula glomerata Carex pulicaris Cerastium arvense Cirsium eriophorum Campanula rotundifolia Carex rostrata Chaenorhinum Cladium mariscus Cardamine bulbifera Carex vesicaria origanifolium Clinopodium acinos Cardamine impatiens Carex vulpina Chamaemelum nobile Clinopodium calamintha Carex canescens Calina vulgaris Chenopodium bonus- Comarum palustre Carex divisa Catabrosa aquatica henricus Crassula tillaea Carex echinata Chenopodium Crepis foetida Carex elata In Part Ce-Cy: chenopodioides Cruciata laevipes Carex elongata Centaurea calcitrapa Chenopodium glaucum Cuscuta epithymum Carex extensa Centaurea cyanus Chenopodium murale Cynoglossum officinale It is issued in draft, pending further development. Records, photographs and information regarding the occurrences of these plants in Kent will be welcome. The register accounts give priority to data from 2010 onwards, but some historic data are also included (however, generally not specific sites with no post-1970 records) so as to indicate trends and where the plant may yet be discovered or rediscovered. Distribution maps for records from 2010 onwards show vice counties 15 and 16 in white (the boundary between is a black line) and local authority boundaries by red lines. See the Kent webpage of the BSBI website at http://www.bsbi.org.uk/kent.html for the full Kent rare plant register list, the introduction to the register and a list of ‘probably extinct’ Kent plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Shepway Draft Core Strategy Review
    Shepway Draft Core Strategy Review Sustainability Appraisal Report Prepared by LUC March 2018 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Lancaster London NW1 1JD FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester Project Title: Shepway Draft Core Strategy Review – Sustainability Appraisal Report Client: Shepway District Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1.0 21/02/2018 Draft SA Report Kieran Josh Allen Jeremy Owen Moroney Josh Allen 2.0 21/02/2018 Final draft report Kieran Josh Allen Jeremy Owen Moroney Josh Allen 3.0 08/03/2018 Final report Josh Allen Josh Allen Jeremy Owen Contents 1 Introduction 1 The Review of the Shepway Core Strategy 1 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment 3 Structure of the SA Report 7 2 Appraisal Methodology 8 3 Relevant Plans, Programmes and Strategies 12 Key International Plans, Policies and Programmes 12 Key National Plans, Policies and Programmes 13 Local Plans, Policies and Programmes 13 4 Baseline information 16 5 Sustainability Appraisal Framework 45 Use of the SA Framework 51 6 Appraisal of High Level Growth Options 52 Approach to High-level Growth Options Appraisal 55 Summary of SA findings for Six Character Areas 58 Overview of Character Area
    [Show full text]