DOCSLIB.ORG

Voter Registration Statistics for the 2020 General Election

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Voter Registration Statistics for the 2020 General Election MONTGOMERY COUNTY VOTER REGISTRATION STATISTIC BOOK 2020 GENERAL ELECTION COUNTYWIDE 00000-DST-009-C Montgomery County Thursday, October 29, 2020 Voter Count by Selected District and Party Federal Voter (Y) IS 0 AND Valid Voter (Y) IS 1 County ID County Political Party Count of Voters by Party CO46 MONTGOMERY COUNTY ADARIAN 8 AMERICA 1 AMERICAN 12 AMERICAN EAGLE 2 AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 5 American Solidarity Party 9 ANARCHIST 1 ANTI OBAMA 1 ANTIESTABLISHMENT 1 ATHEIST 1 BERNIE SANDERS 1 BI-PARTISAN 5 BIRTHDAY 4 BLANK 630 both 1 BULL MOOSE 2 CAPITALIST 1 CARE 1 CENTRALIST 2 CENTRIST 2 CHRISTIAN 5 COMMUNIST 6 COMMUNIST PARTY USA 3 CONSERVATIVE 38 CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRAT 2 CONSERVATIVE INDEPENDENT 1 Conservative Republican 1 CONSTITUTION 19 CONSTITUTIONAL 62 CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTIONALIST 1 CONSUMER 4 DECLINE TO STATE 4 DEMOCRATIC 301831 DEMOCRATIC PROGRESSIVE PARTY 1 Democratic Republican 1 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 7 DEPENDS 1 Ethan's Party 1 FEDERALIST 2 FREE 1 FREEDOM 2 GARY JOHNSON 1 GOOD NEIGHBOR 2 1 County ID County Political Party Count of Voters by Party CO46 MONTGOMERY COUNTY GREEN 707 GREEN PARTY 11 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 3 GUNS AND DOPE 1 HALLOWEEN 3 HILLARY 1 HUMANE 1 HUMANITARIAN 1 I DON'T KNOW 1 I'M IN THE MIDDLE 1 IND. 2 INDEPENDANT 136 INDEPENDENCE 10 INDEPENDENT 6793 INDEPENDENT AMERICAN PARTY OF 2 PA INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE 1 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 9 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 6 INDEPENDENT-COMPLETION 1 INDEPENT 4 INDIVIDUAL 2 JACOBIN 1 JEDI 2 LABOR 1 LIBERAL 36 LIBERAL REPUBLICAN 1 LIBERTARIAN 3227 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 2 Libertarian Socialist 2 MANAYUNK INDEPENDENT 1 MARIJUANA 1 MODERATE 16 MODERN WHIG PARTY 1 MUSLIM 1 N/A 36 NATIONAL SOCIALIST 2 NEUTRAL 8 NEW PROGRESSIVE 1 NO 1 NO AFFILIATION 60105 NO PARTY 543 NO YOU PROBLEMS 1 NON DENOMINATIONAL 1 NONE 2926 NON-INCRIMINATING 1 NON-PARTISAN 17692 NOT DEMO-REPO 1 NOT SURE 27 OBAMA 1 2 County ID County Political Party Count of Voters by Party CO46 MONTGOMERY COUNTY OPEN 3 OTHER 2156 PATRIOT 18 PENNSYLVANIA 1 PIRATE 1 PIRATE PARTY OF THE UNITED 1 STATES PIZZA PARTY 1 PROGRESSIVE 5 PSL 1 REFORM 13 REPUBLICAN 211882 RIGHT TO LIFE 1 SILLY PARTY 1 SOCIALIST 16 TEA PARTY 2 THE SURPRISE PARTY 1 TOGA 1 TRANSHUMANIST PARTY 1 UNAFFILIATED 35 UNCERTAIN 1 UNDECIDED 48 UNDECLARED 7 UNDETERMINED 1 UNITED AMERICA 1 UNKNOWN 26 WHIG 2 WIG-REPUBLICAN 1 WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1 YOUNG OUTSIDER 1 Count of Voters in CO46: 609250 Total Voters on Report: 609250 3 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 00000-DST-009-C Montgomery County Thursday, October 29, 2020 Voter Count by Selected District and Party Federal Voter (Y) IS 0 AND Valid Voter (Y) IS 1 U.S. Congress ID U.S. Congress Political Party Count of Voters by Party USC01 1ST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT AMERICAN 2 AMERICAN EAGLE 1 American Solidarity Party 1 ANARCHIST 1 ATHEIST 1 BI-PARTISAN 1 BLANK 69 CHRISTIAN 1 COMMUNIST 1 CONSERVATIVE 2 CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRAT 2 Conservative Republican 1 CONSTITUTION 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 11 DECLINE TO STATE 1 DEMOCRATIC 26749 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 4 FREE 1 GREEN 70 INDEPENDANT 9 INDEPENDENT 685 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 1 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 1 LIBERAL 6 LIBERTARIAN 338 MODERATE 3 N/A 2 NEUTRAL 1 NO AFFILIATION 6351 NO PARTY 71 NO YOU PROBLEMS 1 NONE 357 NON-PARTISAN 1959 NOT SURE 6 OPEN 1 OTHER 235 PATRIOT 2 PIRATE 1 PROGRESSIVE 2 REFORM 1 REPUBLICAN 22285 RIGHT TO LIFE 1 SOCIALIST 1 UNAFFILIATED 4 1 U.S. Congress ID U.S. Congress Political Party Count of Voters by Party USC01 1ST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT UNDECIDED 4 UNDECLARED 1 UNKNOWN 3 Count of Voters in USC01: 59252 USC04 4TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 8 AMERICA 1 AMERICAN 10 AMERICAN EAGLE 1 AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 5 American Solidarity Party 8 ANTI OBAMA 1 ANTIESTABLISHMENT 1 BERNIE SANDERS 1 BI-PARTISAN 4 BIRTHDAY 4 BLANK 513 both 1 BULL MOOSE 2 CARE 1 CENTRALIST 2 CENTRIST 2 CHRISTIAN 4 COMMUNIST 5 COMMUNIST PARTY USA 3 CONSERVATIVE 35 CONSERVATIVE INDEPENDENT 1 CONSTITUTION 17 CONSTITUTIONAL 50 CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTIONALIST 1 CONSUMER 4 DECLINE TO STATE 3 DEMOCRATIC 257344 DEMOCRATIC PROGRESSIVE PARTY 1 Democratic Republican 1 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 3 DEPENDS 1 FEDERALIST 2 FREEDOM 2 GARY JOHNSON 1 GOOD NEIGHBOR 2 GREEN 606 GREEN PARTY 8 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 2 GUNS AND DOPE 1 HALLOWEEN 3 HILLARY 1 HUMANE 1 HUMANITARIAN 1 2 U.S. Congress ID U.S. Congress Political Party Count of Voters by Party USC04 4TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT I DON'T KNOW 1 I'M IN THE MIDDLE 1 IND. 2 INDEPENDANT 121 INDEPENDENCE 10 INDEPENDENT 5830 INDEPENDENT AMERICAN PARTY OF 2 PA INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE 1 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 8 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 5 INDEPENDENT-COMPLETION 1 INDEPENT 4 INDIVIDUAL 2 JACOBIN 1 JEDI 2 LIBERAL 29 LIBERAL REPUBLICAN 1 LIBERTARIAN 2798 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 2 Libertarian Socialist 2 MANAYUNK INDEPENDENT 1 MARIJUANA 1 MODERATE 13 MODERN WHIG PARTY 1 MUSLIM 1 N/A 34 NATIONAL SOCIALIST 2 NEUTRAL 7 NEW PROGRESSIVE 1 NO 1 NO AFFILIATION 50876 NO PARTY 457 NON DENOMINATIONAL 1 NONE 2356 NON-INCRIMINATING 1 NON-PARTISAN 15156 NOT DEMO-REPO 1 NOT SURE 21 OBAMA 1 OPEN 2 OTHER 1861 PATRIOT 14 PENNSYLVANIA 1 PIRATE PARTY OF THE UNITED 1 STATES PROGRESSIVE 3 PSL 1 REFORM 12 REPUBLICAN 184062 3 U.S. Congress ID U.S. Congress Political Party Count of Voters by Party USC04 4TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT SILLY PARTY 1 SOCIALIST 13 TEA PARTY 2 THE SURPRISE PARTY 1 TRANSHUMANIST PARTY 1 UNAFFILIATED 29 UNCERTAIN 1 UNDECIDED 42 UNDECLARED 5 UNDETERMINED 1 UNITED AMERICA 1 UNKNOWN 23 WHIG 2 WIG-REPUBLICAN 1 WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1 YOUNG OUTSIDER 1 Count of Voters in USC04: 522506 USC05 5TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT BLANK 48 CAPITALIST 1 CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTION 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 1 DEMOCRATIC 17738 Ethan's Party 1 GREEN 31 GREEN PARTY 3 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 1 INDEPENDANT 6 INDEPENDENT 278 LABOR 1 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 91 NO AFFILIATION 2878 NO PARTY 15 NONE 213 NON-PARTISAN 577 OTHER 60 PATRIOT 2 PIZZA PARTY 1 REPUBLICAN 5535 SOCIALIST 2 TOGA 1 UNAFFILIATED 2 UNDECIDED 2 UNDECLARED 1 Count of Voters in USC05: 27492 Total Voters on Report: 609250 4 SENATORIAL DISTRICTS 00000-DST-009-C Montgomery County Thursday, October 29, 2020 Voter Count by Selected District and Party Federal Voter (Y) IS 0 AND Valid Voter (Y) IS 1 State Senate ID State Senate Political Party Count of Voters by Party STS04 4TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 2 AMERICAN 2 AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 3 American Solidarity Party 4 BLANK 96 CENTRIST 1 COMMUNIST 1 CONSERVATIVE 2 CONSTITUTION 2 CONSTITUTIONAL 6 CONSUMER 1 DEMOCRATIC 58553 GOOD NEIGHBOR 1 GREEN 119 GREEN PARTY 2 HALLOWEEN 2 INDEPENDANT 18 INDEPENDENCE 1 INDEPENDENT 880 INDEPENDENT AMERICAN PARTY OF 1 PA INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 1 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 2 JEDI 2 LIBERAL 5 LIBERTARIAN 403 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 1 MODERATE 1 N/A 1 NO AFFILIATION 7590 NO PARTY 60 NONE 420 NON-INCRIMINATING 1 NON-PARTISAN 2080 NOT DEMO-REPO 1 NOT SURE 5 OTHER 282 PATRIOT 3 PSL 1 REPUBLICAN 22461 SILLY PARTY 1 SOCIALIST 3 TEA PARTY 1 UNAFFILIATED 5 UNDECIDED 3 1 State Senate ID State Senate Political Party Count of Voters by Party STS04 4TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT UNDECLARED 1 UNKNOWN 8 WHIG 1 WIG-REPUBLICAN 1 WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1 Count of Voters in STS04: 93042 STS07 7TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT BLANK 33 CARE 1 CENTRALIST 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 1 DECLINE TO STATE 1 DEMOCRATIC 22596 GARY JOHNSON 1 GREEN 47 GREEN PARTY 3 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 1 GUNS AND DOPE 1 HUMANITARIAN 1 INDEPENDANT 5 INDEPENDENT 470 INDEPENDENT AMERICAN PARTY OF 1 PA INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 1 LIBERAL 2 LIBERTARIAN 198 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 1 MODERATE 1 N/A 4 NEW PROGRESSIVE 1 NO AFFILIATION 4264 NO PARTY 39 NONE 163 NON-PARTISAN 1184 NOT SURE 4 OTHER 114 PROGRESSIVE 1 REFORM 1 REPUBLICAN 14225 SOCIALIST 1 UNAFFILIATED 2 UNDECIDED 2 UNKNOWN 2 Count of Voters in STS07: 43373 STS12 12TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 3 AMERICA 1 AMERICAN 4 AMERICAN EAGLE 1 AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 1 2 State Senate ID State Senate Political Party Count of Voters by Party STS12 12TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT American Solidarity Party 1 ANARCHIST 1 ATHEIST 1 BERNIE SANDERS 1 BI-PARTISAN 1 BIRTHDAY 1 BLANK 117 CENTRALIST 1 CHRISTIAN 1 COMMUNIST PARTY USA 1 CONSERVATIVE 10 CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRAT 1 Conservative Republican 1 CONSTITUTION 2 CONSTITUTIONAL 16 CONSUMER 2 DECLINE TO STATE 1 DEMOCRATIC 59133 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 2 FEDERALIST 1 FREE 1 FREEDOM 1 GREEN 135 INDEPENDANT 23 INDEPENDENCE 3 INDEPENDENT 1491 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 3 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 2 LIBERAL 10 LIBERAL REPUBLICAN 1 LIBERTARIAN 742 Libertarian Socialist 1 MANAYUNK INDEPENDENT 1 MODERATE 7 N/A 5 NEUTRAL 1 NO AFFILIATION 13381 NO PARTY 153 NO YOU PROBLEMS 1 NONE 647 NON-PARTISAN 4066 NOT SURE 7 OPEN 1 OTHER 473 PATRIOT 3 PIRATE 1 PIRATE PARTY OF THE UNITED 1 STATES REFORM 3 REPUBLICAN 53262 3 State Senate ID State Senate Political Party Count of Voters by Party STS12 12TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT RIGHT TO LIFE 1 SOCIALIST 5 UNAFFILIATED 8 UNDECIDED 11 UNDECLARED 3 UNKNOWN 6 WHIG 1 Count of Voters in STS12: 133766 STS17 17TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 1 AMERICAN 1 American Solidarity Party 3 ANTIESTABLISHMENT 1 BI-PARTISAN 1 BLANK 187 CAPITALIST 1 CHRISTIAN 1 COMMUNIST 2 CONSERVATIVE 6 CONSTITUTION 5 CONSTITUTIONAL 11 CONSUMER 1 DEMOCRATIC 77743 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 2 DEPENDS 1 Ethan's Party 1 FEDERALIST 1 GREEN 150 GREEN PARTY 5 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 1 HILLARY 1 IND. 1 INDEPENDANT 37 INDEPENDENCE 3 INDEPENDENT 1457 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 2 INDIVIDUAL 1 JACOBIN 1 LABOR 1 LIBERAL 10 LIBERTARIAN 582 Libertarian Socialist 1 MODERATE 2 MODERN WHIG PARTY 1 N/A 16 NATIONAL SOCIALIST 1 NEUTRAL 2 NO AFFILIATION 13928 NO PARTY 95 NONE 842 4 State Senate ID State Senate Political Party Count
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States District Court Southern District of New
    Case 1:10-cv-06923-JSR Document 18 Filed 09/30/10 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE and WORKING FAMILIES PARTY, 10 CIV 6923 (JSR) ECF Case Plaintiffs, MOTION OF THE CITY -against- ORGANIZATIONS OF THE NEW YORK INDEPENDENCE NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; PARTY FOR LEAVE TO JAMES A. WALSH, DOUGLAS A. KELLNER, BRIEF AS AMICI CURIAE EVELYN J. AQUILA, and GREGORY P. PETERSON, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the New York State Board of Elections; TODD D. VALENTINE and ROBERT A. BREHM, in their official capacities as Co-Executive Directors of the New York State Board of Elections Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------X The City Organizations of the New York Independence Party respectfully move for leave to file the Proposed Memorandum of Law of Amici Curiae, annexed hereto as Exhibit A. Annexed hereto as Exhibit B is the declaration of Cathy L. Stewart in support of this motion, and annexed hereto at Exhibit C is a Proposed Order. The City Organizations of the New York Independence Party are interested in this litigation for the reasons set forth in the declaration of Cathy L. Stewart annexed as Exhibit B. The City Organizations of the New York Independence Party respectfully seek leave to file an amici curiae brief in order to provide perspective from the vantage point of the Independence Party organizations of New York City and their members on the impact of New York Election Law Sec. 9-112(4) in light of the decision of defendants on how to treat over voting on the new optical scan voting system.
    [Show full text]
  • With Unions in Decline, Trump's Path to the Presidency Is Unlikely to Be
    With unions in decline, Trump’s path to the presidency is unlikely to be through the Rust Belt. blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2016/08/10/with-unions-in-decline-trumps-path-to-the-presidency-is-unlikely-to-be-through-the-rust-belt/ In this election, Donald Trump has been drawing a great deal of his support from disaffected white working-class voters. Michael McQuarrie writes that Trump’s strategy of courting this group is not surprising; white workers have been slipping away from the Democratic Party for nearly 50 years. Much of this is down to the decline of unions, which in the past had been able to keep white voters anchored to the left. This decline – along with the changing demographics of the Rust Belt- also hurts Trump’s electoral chances; without unions to mobilize them, working class whites are less likely to vote. Donald Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, has argued that Trump’s path to the Presidency was open because of his ability to win traditionally democratic Rust Belt states. Trump’s super PACs, however, are only targeting the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania and Ohio, along with Florida. This is an extremely narrow map, but one that nonetheless has become something like the common sense of this election cycle. Trump, the argument goes, appeals to uneducated white workers more than any other group. To win, he needs to capture swing states with lots of disaffected white working-class voters. The Democrats are not particularly interested in fighting for these votes. Hillary Clinton’s acceptance speech at the Democratic convention, which seemed to have a word for each part of the Democratic coalition, could only appeal to white workers by mustering a comment on Trump’s hypocrisy (Trump ties are made in China, not Colorado!), a ploy that worked with patrician Mitt Romney in 2012, but is unlikely to work with the new tribune of the white workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Policymaking in the Newest Era of Nativist Populism
    IN SEARCH OF A NEW EQUILIBRIUM: IMMIGRATION POLICYMAKING IN THE NEWEST ERA OF NATIVisT POPULisM By Demetrios G. Papademetriou, Kate Hooper, and Meghan Benton TRANSATLANTIC COUNCIL ON MIGRATION IN SEARCH OF A NEW EQUILIBRIUM Immigration Policymaking in the Newest Era of Nativist Populism By Demetrios G. Papademetriou, Kate Hooper, and Meghan Benton November 2018 Acknowledgments This research was commissioned for the eighteenth plenary meeting of the Transatlantic Council on Migration, an initiative of the Migration Policy Institute (MPI), held in Stockholm in November 2017. The meeting’s theme was “The Future of Migration Policy in a Volatile Political Landscape,” and this report was one of several that informed the Council’s discussions. The authors are grateful for Lauren Shaw’s helpful edits and for research assistance from Brian Salant, Gonzaga Mbalungu, Jeffrey Hallock, and Jae June Lee. The Council is a unique deliberative body that examines vital policy issues and informs migration policymaking processes in North America and Europe. The Council’s work is generously supported by the following foundations and governments: the Open Society Foundations, Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Barrow Cadbury Trust, the Luso- American Development Foundation, the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, and the governments of Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. For more on the Transatlantic Council on Migration, please visit: www.migrationpolicy.org/ transatlantic. © 2018 Migration Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved. Cover Design: April Siruno, MPI Layout: Sara Staedicke, MPI No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Migration Policy Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Revalidating Participation: Power and Pre - Figurative Politics Within Contemporary Leftwing Movements
    Bart Cammaerts Revalidating participation: power and pre - figurative politics within contemporary leftwing movements Book section Original citation: Cammaerts, Bart (2019) Revalidating participation: power and pre -figurative politics within contemporary leftwing movements. In: Carpentier, Nico, (ed.) Respublika!: Experiments in the performance of participation and democracy. NeMe, Limassol, Cyprus, pp. 126-137. ISBN 9789963969586 © 2019 The Author This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/91502 Available in LSE Research Online: January 2019 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors a nd/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL ( http://eprints.lse.ac.uk ) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this ve rsion and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Revalidating Participation: Power and Pre-Figurative Politics within Contemporary Leftwing Movements 1 Bart Cammaerts London School of Economics and Political Science Introduction ‘Practice what you preach’ is a popular idiom not only within progressive politics, but also beyond, and this idea is also encapsulated in the famous Mahatma Gandhi quote: ‘If you want to change the world, start with yourself’.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • Jen Metzger Receives Working Families Party Endorsement in State Senate Race
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 16, 2018 CONTACT: Kelleigh McKenzie, 845-518-7352 [email protected] Jen Metzger Receives Working Families Party Endorsement in State Senate Race ROSENDALE, NY — The Working Families Party officially endorsed Rosendale Town Councilwoman Jen Metzger today in her campaign to be the next state senator for New York’s 42nd District. “I am honored to receive this endorsement,” said Metzger. “The Working Families Party stands for an economy that works for everyone, and a democracy in which every voice matters. I am proud to stand with them.” Phillip Leber, Hudson Region Political Director of the Working Families Party, said, “Jen Metzger proves that you don’t need to make a false choice between principled, progressive values, and winning elections. Social movements can only do their jobs if we elect authentic progressives, and Jen Metzger is the real deal.” The endorsement is the outcome of a rigorous application and interview process by the Hudson Regional Council of the Working Families Party, which consists of members of the Hudson Valley Area Labor Federation AFL-CIO, the New York Public Employees Federation, the New York State Nurses Association, New York State United Teachers, Communication Workers of America, Community Voices Heard Power, Hudson Valley Progressives, Citizen Action of New York, and state committee members of the Working Families Party itself. “For two decades now, our state senator has made a career out of taking money from corporate donors and polluters, while giving us handouts,” said Metzger. “I look forward to Friends of Jen Metzger, PO Box 224, Rosendale NY 12472 ⭑ [email protected] ​ ​ partnering with the Working Families Party to support—not block—legislation that meaningfully improves the lives of the people in our district.” Jen Metzger’s campaign website is jenmetzger.com, and voters can also find her on social media at Facebook.com/jenmetzgerNY and Twitter.com/jenmetzgerNY.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • SOOTHING SYRUP Lrusio:I, Will Be Found in the Solicitation Year the Whigs Were in a Minority
    jrioJe JYY. 740. Tarborough, ( Edgecombe County, JV 6TJ balurday, June 13 1840 To. ATI Xo 24. - -, i LuiLMfwaMmf'nTraifOTiiii1ntT Tjc Trti&orough Z9rcss, rung in the ears ofthe people of North Car- Three Solicitors were elected, and two of gum to strike out a censure which he had I BY fiBORiSK HOWAKI), 7?l 2& ? .Tj olina for more than five years. them whigs! gone out of his way and out of the Consti- - J Now suppose I Re- I do Is published weekly at Two llithtrs and Ff'; then, shew that the not overlook the fact that Gen. j Union, to affix to Jackson, when all the i CVW.v per year, if p.i'ul in a Ivaac r, 7"nv publican party of North Carolina have not Patterson resigne I his office of world knows,'h it Mr. Mangum was elected From the Treasurer thillttrs at the expiration of the subscription year. Raleigh Standard. seiz.-- upon the public offices thit they in 1S.33, and that Mr. Couits a R?pn!)Ii h the Senate as a JACKSON MAN, J 7 V- iVr period les? thm a year, liHve , anj not proscribed the whig tint in fact cit-- w a in ins piace. it is also What epithet should honest politicians ap- i 2-- th r.'z.s per month. Subscribers are at liberty to IS 10. office-holder- Raleigh, My, the Whigs ire the Then tell true, that Mr. Courts got a large ply to the "Rayncr Resolutions," discontinue at anytime, 0:1 giving notice thereof number which TO CA- me what epithet will of votes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis
    Sara B. Hobolt, James Tilley Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the Euro crisis Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Hobolt, Sara and Tilley, James (2016) Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the Euro crisis. West European Politics, 39 (5). pp. 971-991. ISSN 1743-9655 DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1181871 © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/66032/ Available in LSE Research Online: July 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Fleeing the Centre: The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis SARA B. HOBOLT Sutherland Chair in European Institutions European Institute London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE Email: [email protected] JAMES TILLEY Professor of Politics Department of Politics and International Relations University of Oxford Email: [email protected] **ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS (FORTHCOMING IN 2016)** The Eurozone crisis has altered the party political landscape across Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans*Forming Understanding of Sexual Orientation and Gender
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2016 Trans*forming understanding of sexual orientation and gender variant minorities: Testing the minority stress model with a diverse sample Karen Elaine Bittner Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Bittner, Karen Elaine, "Trans*forming understanding of sexual orientation and gender variant minorities: Testing the minority stress model with a diverse sample" (2016). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 15879. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15879 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Trans*forming understanding of sexual orientation and gender variant minorities: Testing the minority stress model with a diverse sample by Karen Elaine Bittner A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Psychology Program of Study Committee: Frederick O. Lorenz, Co-Major Professor Susan E. Cross, Co-Major Professor Janet N. Melby Carolyn E. Cutrona Max Guyll Patrick I. Armstrong Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2016 Copyright © Karen
    [Show full text]
  • Killingly,Who Was at the Press Con- Training
    PRE-OWNED SALES EVENT Go to cargillchevy.com ARGILLARGILL CHEVROLETCHEVROLET to view our giant inventory CC860-928-6591860-928-6591 800-927-6591800-927-6591 2 • Friday, September 10, 2010 WOODSTOCK VILLAGER Eastford’s gone to the dogs (and cats) VILLAGER ALMANAC DAY NAMED NEW ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER QUOTATION OF THE WEEK BY MATT SANDERSON municipal pounds and shel- “A lot of people think chocolate milk VILLAGER STAFF WRITER ters,” he said. EASTFORD — The town Ribaudo said the local comes from brown cows.” reestablished its animal animal control officers - Jim Rowley, co-owner of B.R. Simmentals in Pomfret, joking control division last month have to hold a stray cat or about how the world is beginning to shift away from agricultur- and hired a part-time ani- dog in the pound for seven al knowledge. mal control officer, who days, and then they can be began Sept. 1. put up for adoption if they First Selectman Allan are not claimed. The three Platt said the service was scenarios that occur are OPEN TO CLOSE brought back to Eastford that the animal is returned due to simple economics. to its owner, it is euthanized POMFRET The Board of Selectmen or it is adopted. TOWN HALL moved to appoint resident “That’s where my office Monday, Tuesday, Thursday . 8:30 a.m.- 5:00 p.m. Denis Day to the position at comes in,” he said. “We pro- Wednesday. 8:30 a.m.- 6:00 p.m. their Aug. 2 meeting. vide training for that third Friday . CLOSED Prior to Day, Platt said choice.” LIBRARIES the town was contracted for Matt Sanderson photo In Connecticut, Ribaudo Abington Social Library several years to Douglas The Eastford animal shelter on Westford Road.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pirate Party and New Politics in OECD Countries Matt Hastings Political Science Jennifer Fitzgerald
    Politics as Unusual: The Pirate Party and New Politics in OECD Countries Matt Hastings Political Science Jennifer Fitzgerald: Thesis Advisor Committee Members: Andy Baker: Political Science Jennifer Fitzgerald: Political Science David Spires: History University of Colorado, Boulder April 4, 2011 Politics as Unusual: Matt Hastings 1 Abstract: Standard bearer left and right parties, the customary powers for over a century, are under siege from new political movements that range from green and animal rights parties to a resurgent radical right. One piece of this new politics movement is a party that began in Sweden. Focusing on intellectual property rights and technology, specifically the internet, the Pirate Party of Sweden achieved representation in the European Parliament in June of 2009. This success has lead to the emergence of other Pirate Parties across Europe and even Canada. This paper seeks to answer what domestic factors would result in individuals forming and voting for Pirate Parties, a small piece of this new politics movement. Analysis is done using logistic regressions of variables corresponding to four schools of thought. After the data is analyzed, the evidence points to the Pirate Party being the result of electoral structural (the effective number of parties) and the culmination of values change in the 34 OECD countries. Now and then we had a hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be pirates. Mark Twain, from Life on the Mississippi Politics as Unusual: Matt Hastings 2 I. Introduction: Puzzling Politics There are tremors in the electoral systems of many modern democracies. Outside of Europe, the most recent midterm elections in the United States saw the emergence of the fiscally minded Tea Party carve itself out of the Republican Party, creating a new movement for conservatives to consider in Washington (Barstow 2010).
    [Show full text]