DOCSLIB.ORG

302 Direct Digital Variometer Manual ______

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

302 Direct Digital Variometer Manual ______________________________________ 302 DDV TM Cambridge Aero Instruments, Inc. 6047 Executive Centre, Suite 1 Memphis, Tennessee 38134 (901)382-1352 voice (901)382-1351 fax www.cambridge-aero.com 302 Direct Digital Variometer Manual Firmware Version 2.6 Firmware by Phil Schlosser; Text by Dave Ellis The IGC approval document is on the CD supplied with the instrument. WARRANTY All Cambridge Aero Instruments, Inc., products are guaranteed against defects for TWO YEARS from date of original purchase, when used in gliders. The warranty is limited to faulty workmanship and/or materials. The unit must be returned to the factory or to an authorized repair station. This warranty is void if failure is due to accident, mishandling, or repairs performed by unauthorized persons. This warranty is given in lieu of all other warranties, expressed or implied. NOTICE This device is not to be relied upon for navigation in flight. This device is designed only to be an aid to navigation performed by using required training and methods without this device. 302 DDV Manual - February, 2003, July 2007 – Cambridge P/N MA-013 Page 1 of 26 pages 302 Direct Digital Variometer Manual Table of Contents Section Page # 1. Introduction 3 2. Installing the Instrument 4 2.1 Instrument Panel Mounting 2.2 Pneumatic Tubing Connections 2.3 GPS Antenna Installation 6 2.4 Outside Air Temperature Probe Installation 2.5 Power and Logic Wiring 7 3. The DDV Operator’s Guide 9 3.1 Instrument Controls 3.2 The LCD Screens 3.3 The Power-ON Screens 11 4. Configuring the DDV using the Utility Program 12 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Installing the Utility program 4.3 Running the Utility program 4.4 Utility program troubleshooting 19 5. Flight Recording with the DDV 19 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Transferring flight logs from the DDV 20 6. Troubleshooting your Cambridge DDV system 20 7. Flying with the DDV 22 8. Technical Specifications 23 Appendix A. DDV Firmware Upgrades 23 Appendix B. 300-series data communications 25 Appendix C. 300-series installation for 2-seat gliders 26 302 DDV Manual - February, 2003, July 2007 – Cambridge P/N MA-013 Page 2 of 26 pages 1.0 Introduction The Cambridge 302 Direct Digital Variometer (DDV) has sensors for altitude, airspeed, acceleration, engine noise level, and temperature. It gives visual and audio climb and speed-to-fly information; and it displays climb rate, average climb rate, altitude and MacCready setting. The 302 DDV includes an integral GPS receiver that generates IGC-approved Secure Flight Logs. The instrument supports other Cambridge 300-series products such as the 304 Pocket-NAV graphic display, and the 303-NAV navigation display. Calibration and performance adjustments are firmware based. The DDV is altitude and temperature compensated. Flash memory is used for firmware as well as flight logs. Firmware upgrades are distributed via the Cambridge web site on the Internet. There are 4 versions of the DDV: 302M Metric dial plate (M/S) 302E English dial plate (Knots) 302M-MG Motorglider (M/S) 302E-MG Motorglider (Knots) The Cambridge DDV is supplied with ALL parts necessary for installation as follows: 1. A 302 Standard Power Cable (CAA-114) 2. The white-tipped Outside Air Temperature (OAT) probe (CAA-115) 3. The 6 foot (2 meter) beige serial data cable (HA-349) 4. The plastic laminated Operator’s Card (MA-012) 5. This User’s Guide (MA-013) 6. A CD-ROM with all programs and documents in PDF form. 7. Spare power cable (CAA-116) 8. A small screwdriver for the plug and connector strip (TL-001) 9. 1 meter of soft silicone rubber instrument tubing (WA-044). 10. Three “Tee” (HA-100) and three “Straight” (HA-101) tubing connectors 11. A package of 15 small tie wraps 12. A GPS antenna with SMC connector (HA-435) (302 only) 13. A remote speaker (CAF-031) (302 Motorglider version only) The DDV supports an auxiliary NIMH battery pack (CA-117). During normal flight the instrument keeps the auxiliary battery charged. If the glider’s main battery fails, the auxiliary battery powers a complete Cambridge 300 system for more than two hours. 302 DDV Manual - February, 2003, July 2007 – Cambridge P/N MA-013 Page 3 of 26 pages 2. Installing the Cambridge 302 Direct Digital Variometer Please don’t rush to put this instrument into your glider. It is much, much more than a variometer. You will benefit from experimenting with the instrument before flying with it, so we have supplied you with a spare power connector. Connect the instrument to any 12-volt power source so you can play with it at home. Turn the TV set off for several evenings and make friends with your new instrument. The Cambridge DDV needs to be configured for glider polar, measurement units, and pilot preferences. This is done with 302 Utility Programs using your PC or your Windows CE PDA. Section 4 of this manual has instructions for using the Utility program The DDV can also be configured from the 303-NAV LCD display. 2.1 Mounting the instrument in the glider panel The instrument fits any standard 57-mm (2.25”) round panel opening. There is an adapter for mounting the instrument in an 80-mm (3.12”) hole. The knob shaft at the lower left of the instrument face will fit through the standard instrument mounting screw hole. To remove the knob for installation, snap the knob cover off with your fingernail and loosen the screw. The knob will slide off the shaft. When re-installing the knob, make sure it can be pushed in enough to actuate the momentary pushbutton switch. Be careful to center the shaft in its instrument panel hole. The push-button switch won’t work properly if the shaft rubs on the panel. 2.2 Pneumatic Tubing Connections Cambridge DDV performance is limited by behavior of the glider’s pressure sources, rather than by quality and calibration of its pressure sensors. Good performance will be obtained with safe, conservative choices for pressure sources. Performance optimization requires that you, the pilot, understand the issues and be willing to experiment with different sources of static and pitot pressure. 2.2.1 Connections for Airspeed Measurement Airspeed is computed from “dynamic pressure”, the difference between pitot and static pressure. The upper two ports sense dynamic pressure. Connect the instrument’s Static Port (top fitting) to the same source that supplies static pressure to the glider’s mechanical Air Speed Indicator (ASI). Connect the Pitot Port (middle fitting) to the same source that supplies pitot pressure to the glider’s ASI. Proper DDV function depends critically on correct airspeed measurement. It is REALLY important that pitot and static pressure connections are correct. Indicated Airspeed (IAS) is shown on DDV Screen #10 (See Section 3). During flight, make sure that your mechanical ASI and the DDV IAS readings agree. If you see a negative airspeed, you have reversed the pitot and static connections. If DDV IAS values seem really weird, check the airspeed display units. (Display units are discussed in Sections 4.3) 302 DDV Manual - February, 2003, July 2007 – Cambridge P/N MA-013 Page 4 of 26 pages 2.2.2 Connections for Altitude Measurement The DDV has two independent barometric pressure sensors that measure altitude. The altimeter reading shown on the instrument’s HOME screen comes from a pressure sensor with no pilot-accessible port. This Altimeter also generates the Barograph trace for DDV Flight Logs. Note: Flight Log Altitude is based on the standard atmosphere sea level barometric pressure of 29.92”Hg (1013.2mBar) The second barometric pressure sensor is used exclusively by the variometer. The fitting for this sensor (TE/Static) is at the bottom of the instrument’s rear panel. For diagnostic purposes, altitude measured by this sensor is shown as [Pr Al] on Screen #6 (See Section 3). To be useful in a modern glider, a variometer must be Total Energy Compensated (TEC). This is because gliders are wonderfully efficient at converting speed into altitude and vice-versa. A non-TEC vario goes crazy during pull-ups into thermals. The glider’s Total Energy is the sum of potential energy (altitude) and kinetic energy (airspeed). A TEC vario measures how quickly total energy, rather than just altitude, is changing. A vario with good TE-compensation is insensitive to “stick-thermals” caused by the pilot. A Total Energy (TE) probe is an air pressure source that incorporates both kinetic and potential energy measurement. See any textbook on gliding for an explanation. Section 2.2.3 explains how to connect the DDV to a TE-Probe. The Cambridge DDV measures kinetic energy (derived from its airspeed sensor). It can achieve Total Energy compensation by electronically adding potential energy (altitude) and kinetic energy (airspeed). Section 2.2.4 explains how to connect the DDV so TE compensation is done electronically without using the glider’s TE probe. 2.2.3 Total Energy Compensation using the TE-Probe (Recommended!) Connect the DDV TE/Static port to the glider’s Total Energy (TE) probe. The probe provides TE compensation. This configuration REQUIRES that you set the TE percentage shown on Screen #9 to ~0%. (No electronic TE compensation). 2.2.4 Electronic Total Energy compensation. Connect the DDV TE/Static port to the glider’s Static pressure source. In this case, the Airspeed Static Port and TE/Static port are connected together. This configuration REQUIRES that you set the TE percentage shown on Screen #9 to ~100%. (Complete electronic TE compensation) 302 DDV Manual - February, 2003, July 2007 – Cambridge P/N MA-013 Page 5 of 26 pages 2.2.5 Using Prandtl Tube or “Triple Probe” pneumatic sources A Prandtl Tube or “Triple Probe” is an excellent source of both Static and Pitot pressures.
Recommended publications
  • Pitot-Static System Blockage Effects on Airspeed Indicator

    Pitot-Static System Blockage Effects on Airspeed Indicator

    The Dramatic Effects of Pitot-Static System Blockages and Failures by Luiz Roberto Monteiro de Oliveira . Table of Contents I ‐ Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 II ‐ Pitot‐Static Instruments…………………………………………………………………………………………..3 III ‐ Blockage Scenarios – Description……………………………..…………………………………….…..…11 IV ‐ Examples of the Blockage Scenarios…………………..……………………………………………….…15 V ‐ Disclaimer………………………………………………………………………………………………………………50 VI ‐ References…………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……..……51 Please also review and understand the disclaimer found at the end of the article before applying the information contained herein. I - Introduction This article takes a comprehensive look into Pitot-static system blockages and failures. These typically affect the airspeed indicator (ASI), vertical speed indicator (VSI) and altimeter. They can also affect the autopilot auto-throttle and other equipment that relies on airspeed and altitude information. There have been several commercial flights, more recently Air France's flight 447, whose crash could have been due, in part, to Pitot-static system issues and pilot reaction. It is plausible that the pilot at the controls could have become confused with the erroneous instrument readings of the airspeed and have unknowingly flown the aircraft out of control resulting in the crash. The goal of this article is to help remove or reduce, through knowledge, the likelihood of at least this one link in the chain of problems that can lead to accidents. Table 1 below is provided to summarize
  • Airspeed Indicator Calibration

    Airspeed Indicator Calibration

    TECHNICAL GUIDANCE MATERIAL AIRSPEED INDICATOR CALIBRATION This document explains the process of calibration of the airspeed indicator to generate curves to convert indicated airspeed (IAS) to calibrated airspeed (CAS) and has been compiled as reference material only. i Technical Guidance Material BushCat NOSE-WHEEL AND TAIL-DRAGGER FITTED WITH ROTAX 912UL/ULS ENGINE APPROVED QRH PART NUMBER: BCTG-NT-001-000 AIRCRAFT TYPE: CHEETAH – BUSHCAT* DATE OF ISSUE: 18th JUNE 2018 *Refer to the POH for more information on aircraft type. ii For BushCat Nose Wheel and Tail Dragger LSA Issue Number: Date Published: Notable Changes: -001 18/09/2018 Original Section intentionally left blank. iii Table of Contents 1. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................... 1 2. DETERMINATION OF INSTRUMENT ERROR FOR YOUR ASI ................................................ 2 3. GENERATING THE IAS-CAS RELATIONSHIP FOR YOUR AIRCRAFT....................................... 5 4. CORRECT ALIGNMENT OF THE PITOT TUBE ....................................................................... 9 APPENDIX A – ASI INSTRUMENT ERROR SHEET ....................................................................... 11 Table of Figures Figure 1 Arrangement of instrument calibration system .......................................................... 3 Figure 2 IAS instrument error sample ........................................................................................ 7 Figure 3 Sample relationship between
  • Sept. 12, 1950 W

    Sept. 12, 1950 W

    Sept. 12, 1950 W. ANGST 2,522,337 MACH METER Filed Dec. 9, 1944 2 Sheets-Sheet. INVENTOR. M/2 2.7aar alwg,57. A77OAMA). Sept. 12, 1950 W. ANGST 2,522,337 MACH METER Filed Dec. 9, 1944 2. Sheets-Sheet 2 N 2 2 %/ NYSASSESSN S2,222,W N N22N \ As I, mtRumaIII-m- III It's EARAs i RNSITIE, 2 72/ INVENTOR, M247 aeawosz. "/m2.ATTORNEY. Patented Sept. 12, 1950 2,522,337 UNITED STATES ; :PATENT OFFICE 2,522,337 MACH METER Walter Angst, Manhasset, N. Y., assignor to Square D Company, Detroit, Mich., a corpora tion of Michigan Application December 9, 1944, Serial No. 567,431 3 Claims. (Cl. 73-182). is 2 This invention relates to a Mach meter for air plurality of posts 8. Upon one of the posts 8 are craft for indicating the ratio of the true airspeed mounted a pair of serially connected aneroid cap of the craft to the speed of sound in the medium sules 9 and upon another of the posts 8 is in which the aircraft is traveling and the object mounted a diaphragm capsuler it. The aneroid of the invention is the provision of an instrument s: capsules 9 are sealed and the interior of the cas-l of this type for indicating the Mach number of an . ing is placed in communication with the static aircraft in fight. opening of a Pitot static tube through an opening The maximum safe Mach number of any air in the casing, not shown. The interior of the dia craft is the value of the ratio of true airspeed to phragm capsule is connected through the tub the speed of sound at which the laminar flow of ing 2 to the Pitot or pressure opening of the Pitot air over the wings fails and shock Waves are en static tube through the opening 3 in the back countered.
  • Acnmanual.Pdf

    Acnmanual.Pdf

    Advanced Coastal Navigation Coast Guard Auxiliary Association Inc. Washington, D. C. First Edition..........................................................................1987 Second Edition .....................................................................1990 Third Edition ........................................................................1999 Fourth Edition.......................................................................2002 ii iii iv v vi Advanced Coastal Navigation TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...................................................................................................ix Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION TO COASTAL NAVIGATION . .1-1 Chapter 2 THE MARINE MAGNETIC COMPASS . .2-1 Chapter 3 THE NAUTICAL CHART . .3-1 Chapter 4 THE NAVIGATOR’S TOOLS & INSTRUMENTS . .4-1 Chapter 5 DEAD RECKONING . .5-1 Chapter 6 PILOTING . .6-1 Chapter 7 CURRENT SAILING . .7-1 Chapter 8 TIDES AND TIDAL CURRENTS . .8-1 Chapter 9 RADIONAVIGATION . .9-1 Chapter 10 NAVIGATION REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS . .10-1 Chapter 11 FUEL AND VOYAGE PLANNING . .11-1 Chapter 12 REFLECTIONS . .12-1 Appendix A GLOSSARY . .A-1 INDEX . .Index-1 vii Advanced Coastal Navigation viii intRodUction WELCOME ABOARD! Welcome to the exciting world of completed the course. But it does marine navigation! This is the fourth require a professional atti tude, care- edition of the text Advanced Coastal ful attention to classroom presenta- Navigation (ACN), designed to be tions, and diligence in working out used in con cert with the 1210-Tr sample problems. chart in the Public Education (PE) The ACN course has been course of the same name taught by designed to utilize the 1210-Tr nau - the United States Coast Guard tical chart. It is suggested that this Auxiliary (USCGAUX). Portions of chart be readily at hand so that you this text are also used for the Basic can follow along as you read the Coastal Navigation (BCN) PE text. We recognize that students course.
  • Soaring Weather

    Soaring Weather

    Chapter 16 SOARING WEATHER While horse racing may be the "Sport of Kings," of the craft depends on the weather and the skill soaring may be considered the "King of Sports." of the pilot. Forward thrust comes from gliding Soaring bears the relationship to flying that sailing downward relative to the air the same as thrust bears to power boating. Soaring has made notable is developed in a power-off glide by a conven­ contributions to meteorology. For example, soar­ tional aircraft. Therefore, to gain or maintain ing pilots have probed thunderstorms and moun­ altitude, the soaring pilot must rely on upward tain waves with findings that have made flying motion of the air. safer for all pilots. However, soaring is primarily To a sailplane pilot, "lift" means the rate of recreational. climb he can achieve in an up-current, while "sink" A sailplane must have auxiliary power to be­ denotes his rate of descent in a downdraft or in come airborne such as a winch, a ground tow, or neutral air. "Zero sink" means that upward cur­ a tow by a powered aircraft. Once the sailcraft is rents are just strong enough to enable him to hold airborne and the tow cable released, performance altitude but not to climb. Sailplanes are highly 171 r efficient machines; a sink rate of a mere 2 feet per second. There is no point in trying to soar until second provides an airspeed of about 40 knots, and weather conditions favor vertical speeds greater a sink rate of 6 feet per second gives an airspeed than the minimum sink rate of the aircraft.
  • 5.2 Drag Reduction Through Higher Wing Loading David L. Kohlman

    5.2 Drag Reduction Through Higher Wing Loading David L. Kohlman

    5.2 Drag Reduction Through Higher Wing Loading David L. Kohlman University of Kansas |ntroduction The wing typically accounts for almost half of the wetted area of today's production light airplanes and approximately one-third of the total zero-lift or parasite drag. Thus the wing should be a primary focal point of any attempts to reduce drag of light aircraft with the most obvious configuration change being a reduction in wing area. Other possibilities involve changes in thickness, planform, and airfoil section. This paper will briefly discuss the effects of reducing wing area of typical light airplanes, constraints involved, and related configuration changes which may be necessary. Constraints and Benefits The wing area of current light airplanes is determined primarily by stall speed and/or climb performance requirements. Table I summarizes the resulting wing loading for a representative spectrum of single-engine airplanes. The maximum lift coefficient with full flaps, a constraint on wing size, is also listed. Note that wing loading (at maximum gross weight) ranges between about 10 and 20 psf, with most 4-place models averaging between 13 and 17. Maximum lift coefficient with full flaps ranges from 1.49 to 2.15. Clearly if CLmax can be increased, a corresponding decrease in wing area can be permitted with no change in stall speed. If total drag is not increased at climb speed, the change in wing area will not adversely affect climb performance either and cruise drag will be reduced. Though not related to drag, it is worthy of comment that the range of wing loading in Table I tends to produce a rather uncomfortable ride in turbulent air, as every light-plane pilot is well aware.
  • FAA Advisory Circular AC 91-74B

    FAA Advisory Circular AC 91-74B

    U.S. Department Advisory of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Circular Subject: Pilot Guide: Flight in Icing Conditions Date:10/8/15 AC No: 91-74B Initiated by: AFS-800 Change: This advisory circular (AC) contains updated and additional information for the pilots of airplanes under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) parts 91, 121, 125, and 135. The purpose of this AC is to provide pilots with a convenient reference guide on the principal factors related to flight in icing conditions and the location of additional information in related publications. As a result of these updates and consolidating of information, AC 91-74A, Pilot Guide: Flight in Icing Conditions, dated December 31, 2007, and AC 91-51A, Effect of Icing on Aircraft Control and Airplane Deice and Anti-Ice Systems, dated July 19, 1996, are cancelled. This AC does not authorize deviations from established company procedures or regulatory requirements. John Barbagallo Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service 10/8/15 AC 91-74B CONTENTS Paragraph Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1. Purpose ..............................................................................................................................1 1-2. Cancellation ......................................................................................................................1 1-3. Definitions.........................................................................................................................1 1-4. Discussion .........................................................................................................................6
  • Hang Glider: Range Maximization the Problem Is to Compute the flight Inputs to a Hang Glider So As to Provide a Maximum Range flight

    Hang Glider: Range Maximization the Problem Is to Compute the flight Inputs to a Hang Glider So As to Provide a Maximum Range flight

    Hang Glider: Range Maximization The problem is to compute the flight inputs to a hang glider so as to provide a maximum range flight. This problem first appears in [1]. The hang glider has weight W (glider plus pilot), a lift force L acting perpendicular to its velocity vr relative to the air, and a drag force D acting in a direction opposite to vr. Denote by x the horizontal position of the glider, by vx the horizontal component of the absolute velocity, by y the vertical position, and by vy the vertical component of absolute velocity. The airmass is not static: there is a thermal just 250 meters ahead. The profile of the thermal is given by the following upward wind velocity: 2 2 − x −2.5 x u (x) = u e ( R ) 1 − − 2.5 . a m R We take R = 100 m and um = 2.5 m/s. Note, MKS units are used through- out. The upwind profile is shown in Figure 1. Letting η denote the angle between vr and the horizontal plane, we have the following equations of motion: 1 x˙ = vx, v˙x = m (−L sin η − D cos η), 1 y˙ = vy, v˙y = m (L cos η − D sin η − W ) with q vy − ua(x) 2 2 η = arctan , vr = vx + (vy − ua(x)) , vx 1 1 L = c ρSv2,D = c (c )ρSv2,W = mg. 2 L r 2 D L r The glider is controlled by the lift coefficient cL. The drag coefficient is assumed to depend on the lift coefficient as 2 cD(cL) = c0 + kcL where c0 = 0.034 and k = 0.069662.
  • Module-7 Lecture-29 Flight Experiment

    Module-7 Lecture-29 Flight Experiment

    Module-7 Lecture-29 Flight Experiment: Instruments used in flight experiment, pre and post flight measurement of aircraft c.g. Module Agenda • Instruments used in flight experiments. • Pre and post flight measurement of center of gravity. • Experimental procedure for the following experiments. (a) Cruise Performance: Estimation of profile Drag coefficient (CDo ) and Os- walds efficiency (e) of an aircraft from experimental data obtained during steady and level flight. (b) Climb Performance: Estimation of Rate of Climb RC and Absolute and Service Ceiling from experimental data obtained during steady climb flight (c) Estimation of stick free and fixed neutral and maneuvering point using flight data. (d) Static lateral-directional stability tests. (e) Phugoid demonstration (f) Dutch roll demonstration 1 Instruments used for experiments1 1. Airspeed Indicator: The airspeed indicator shows the aircraft's speed (usually in knots ) relative to the surrounding air. It works by measuring the ram-air pressure in the aircraft's Pitot tube. The indicated airspeed must be corrected for air density (which varies with altitude, temperature and humidity) in order to obtain the true airspeed, and for wind conditions in order to obtain the speed over the ground. 2. Attitude Indicator: The attitude indicator (also known as an artificial horizon) shows the aircraft's relation to the horizon. From this the pilot can tell whether the wings are level and if the aircraft nose is pointing above or below the horizon. This is a primary instrument for instrument flight and is also useful in conditions of poor visibility. Pilots are trained to use other instruments in combination should this instrument or its power fail.
  • How to Make My Air Glide S Work Properly

    How to Make My Air Glide S Work Properly

    How to make my Air Glide S work properly Originally written by Horst Rupp. Many thanks to Richard Frawley who edited and retranslated this article into proper English. 2014/11/21. The basic prerequisite for the Air Glide S, in particular the AHRS part, to work properly so that the extraneous ‘noise’ (gusts, wind shifts, perturbations etc) can be removed is to ensure that it is set up correctly. The instrument is very sensitive and the installation needs to be done in a way that ensures that only the correct inputs are being sensed. Most legacy instrument installations take all pressures from probes at the rudder fin. And most unfortunately, many of them use the total energy (TE) pressure from the fin to feed in parallel a mass-measurement variometer with a capacity flask (in Germany mostly a Winter) and a pressure sensor probe variometer such as the Air Glide S (no capacity flask). There are many publications indicating the deterioration (mostly damping) of the pressure sensor probe measurements by the stream of air mass in and out of the capacity flask. So, it is obviously a somewhat bad idea to do that to your Air Glide S. This interference with a mass measuring instruments is certainly not compliant with the above mentioned basic prerequisite. Fortunately, the Air Glide S can be compensated by total pressure (called electronic compensation as opposed to TE compensation). This is a new feature of the Air Glide S arriving with V 1.1. Total pressure and TE pressure carry more or less (depends on quality of probe) the same information - but for the sign : Total pressure is static pressure PLUS pitot pressure, TE pressure is static pressure MINUS pitot pressure (probe compensation factor (~)-1).
  • Subsonic Aircraft Wing Conceptual Design Synthesis and Analysis

    Subsonic Aircraft Wing Conceptual Design Synthesis and Analysis

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by GSSRR.ORG: International Journals: Publishing Research Papers in all Fields International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) ISSN 2307-4531 (Print & Online) http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subsonic Aircraft Wing Conceptual Design Synthesis and Analysis Abderrahmane BADIS Electrical and Electronic Communication Engineer from UMBB (Ex.INELEC) Independent Electronics, Aeronautics, Propulsion, Well Logging and Software Design Research Engineer Takerboust, Aghbalou, Bouira 10007, Algeria [email protected] Abstract This paper exposes a simplified preliminary conceptual integrated method to design an aircraft wing in subsonic speeds up to Mach 0.85. The proposed approach is integrated, as it allows an early estimation of main aircraft aerodynamic features, namely the maximum lift-to-drag ratio and the total parasitic drag. First, the influence of the Lift and Load scatterings on the overall performance characteristics of the wing are discussed. It is established that the optimization is achieved by designing a wing geometry that yields elliptical lift and load distributions. Second, the reference trapezoidal wing is considered the base line geometry used to outline the wing shape layout. As such, the main geometrical parameters and governing relations for a trapezoidal wing are
  • F—18 Navy Air Combat Fighter

    F—18 Navy Air Combat Fighter

    74 /2 >Af ^y - Senate H e a r tn ^ f^ n 12]$ Before the Committee on Appro priations (,() \ ER WIIA Storage ime nts F EB 1 2 « T H e -,M<rUN‘U«sni KAN S A S S F—18 Na vy Air Com bat Fighter Fiscal Year 1976 th CONGRESS, FIRS T SES SION H .R . 986 1 SPECIAL HEARING F - 1 8 NA VY AIR CO MBA T FIG H TER HEARING BEFORE A SUBC OMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE NIN ETY-FOURTH CONGRESS FIR ST SE SS IO N ON H .R . 9 8 6 1 AN ACT MAKIN G APP ROPR IA TIO NS FO R THE DEP ARTM EN T OF D EFEN SE FO R T H E FI SC AL YEA R EN DI NG JU N E 30, 1976, AND TH E PE RIO D BE GIN NIN G JU LY 1, 1976, AN D EN DI NG SEPT EM BER 30, 1976, AND FO R OTH ER PU RP OSE S P ri nte d fo r th e use of th e Com mittee on App ro pr ia tio ns SPECIAL HEARING U.S. GOVERNM ENT PRINT ING OFF ICE 60-913 O WASHINGTON : 1976 SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS JOHN L. MCCLELLAN, Ark ans as, Chairman JOH N C. ST ENN IS, Mississippi MILTON R. YOUNG, No rth D ako ta JOH N O. P ASTORE, Rhode Island ROMAN L. HRUSKA, N ebraska WARREN G. MAGNUSON, Washin gton CLIFFORD I’. CASE, New Je rse y MIK E MANSFIEL D, Montana HIRAM L.