DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Quantum System Dynamics: Applications to Decoherence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Quantum System Dynamics: Applications to Decoherence i Contents Introduction 1 1 Open Quantum Systems 5 1.1 Reduced state and its evolution ..................... 5 1.1.1 Complete positivity ....................... 7 1.2 Lindblad equation ............................. 8 2 Decoherence 9 2.1 Gallis-Flemming master equation .................... 10 2.1.1 Short wavelength limit ...................... 12 2.1.2 Long wavelength limit ...................... 12 2.2 Rotational Decoherence ......................... 13 3 Quantum Brownian Motion 18 3.1 The model ................................. 18 3.2 The Calderira-Leggett master equation ................. 20 3.2.1 Complete positivity problem .................. 23 3.3 Non-Markovian Quantum Brownian motion ............. 23 3.3.1 The adjoint master equation ................... 24 3.3.2 The Master Equation for the statistical operator ....... 27 3.3.3 Complete Positivity ....................... 29 3.3.4 Time evolution of relevant quantities ............. 31 3.3.5 Non-Gaussian initial state .................... 34 4 Gravitational time dilation 37 4.1 Model for universal decoherence .................... 38 4.2 Heat capacity for gravitational decoherence .............. 39 4.3 Competing effects ............................. 40 4.3.1 Comparison of the effects .................... 42 5 Collapse Models 45 5.1 Continuous Spontaneous Localization Model ............. 45 5.1.1 Imaginary noise trick ....................... 49 5.2 Optomechanical probing collapse models ............... 49 5.3 Gravitational wave detectors bound collapse parameters space ... 53 5.3.1 Interferometric GW detectors: LIGO .............. 56 5.3.2 Space-based experiments: LISA Pathfinder .......... 57 5.3.3 Resonant GW detectors: AURIGA ............... 58 5.4 Ultra-cold cantilever detection of non-thermal excess noise ..... 61 5.5 Hypothetical bounds from torsional motion .............. 67 5.5.1 Experimental feasibility ..................... 69 ii 6 Conclusions 71 Appendices A Quantum Brownian Motion master equation 74 A.1 Explicit form of φ(t) ............................ 74 A.2 Explicit form of the adjoint master equation .............. 74 A.3 Derivation of the master equation for the states ............ 75 A.4 Explicit expression for ⇤dif(t) and E(t) ................. 76 B Gravitational time dilation 78 C Collapse Models 80 C.1 CSL Diffusion coefficients ........................ 80 C.2 Effective frequencies and damping constants ............. 81 C.3 Cantilever ................................. 82 Bibliography 92 iii List of Publications Published works as outcome of the doctoral project 1. A. Vinante, R. Mezzena, P. Falferi, M. Carlesso and A. Bassi. Improved noninterferometric test of collapse models using ultracold cantilevers. Physical Review Letters, 119 110401 (2017). Link to paper: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.110401 Link to ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09776 The most important contents of this article are reported in Sec. 5.4. 2. M. Carlesso and A. Bassi. Adjoint master equation for quantum brownian motion. Physical Review A, 95 052119 (2017). Link to paper: https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.052119 Link to ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.05116 The most important contents of this article are reported in Sec. 3.3. 3. S. McMillen, M. Brunelli, M. Carlesso, A. Bassi, H. Ulbricht, M. G. A. Paris, and M. Paternostro. Quantum-limited estimation of continuous spontaneous localization. Physical Review A, 95 012132 (2017). Link to paper: https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.012132 Link to ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00070 iv 4. M. Carlesso, A. Bassi, P. Falferi, and A. Vinante. Experimental bounds on collapse models from gravitational wave detectors. Physical Review D, 94 124036 (2016). Link to paper: https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124036 Link to ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04581 The most important contents of this article are reported in Sec. 5.3. 5. M. Carlesso and A. Bassi. Decoherence due to gravitational time dilation: Analysis of competing decoher- ence effects. Physics Letters A, 380 (31–32), pp. 2354 – 2358 (2016). Link to paper: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960116302407 Link to ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01979 The most important contents of this article are reported in Chap. 4. Pre-prints 6. M. Carlesso, M. Paternostro, H. Ulbricht, A. Vinante and A. Bassi. Non-interferometric test of the Continuous Spontaneous Localization model based on the torsional motion of a cylinder. ArXiv, 1708.04812 (2017). Link to ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.04812 The most important contents of this article are reported in Sec. 5.5. 7. M. Carlesso, M. Paternostro, H. Ulbricht and A. Bassi. When Cavendish meets Feynman: A quantum torsion balance for testing the quantumness of gravity. ArXiv, 1710.08695 (2017). Link to ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.08695 v List of attended Schools, Workshops and Conferences 1. September, 2017 Training Workshop at Instituto Superior Tecnico of Lisbon, Portugal Title Lisbon Training Workshop on Quantum Technologies in Space http://www.qtspace.eu/?q=node/131 Organization Dr. R. Kaltenbaek, Dr. E. Murphy, Dr. J. Leitao and Dr. Y. Omar 2. June, 2017 Workshop at University of Milano, Italy Title Fundamental problems of quantum physics http://www.mi.infn.it/~vacchini/workshopBELL17.html Organization Dr. B. Vacchini 3. May, 2017 Workshop at Laboratory Nazionali in Frascati, Italy Title The physics of what happens and the measurement problem https://agenda.infn.it/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=13169 Organization Dr. A. Bassi, Dr. C.O. Curceanu, Dr. B. Hiesmayr and Dr. K. Pis- cicchia 4. May, 2017 Junior Symposium in Trieste, Italy Title Trieste Junior Quantum Days http://people.sissa.it/~alemiche/junior-tsqd-2017.html Organization Dr. A. Bassi, Dr. F. Benatti and Dr. A. Michelangeli 5. March, 2017 Conference and Working Group Meeting in Valletta, Malta Title QTSpace meets in Malta http://www.qtspace.eu/?q=node/112 Organization Dr. M. Paternostro, Dr. A. Bassi, Dr. S. Gröblacher, Dr. H. Ul- bricht, Dr. R. Kaltenbaek and Dr. C. Marquardt 6. November, 2016 Autumn School at LMU in Munich, Germany Title Mathematical Foundations of Physics https://light-and-matter.github.io/autumn-school Organization Dr. D.-A. Dercket and Dr. S. Petrat vi 7. May, 2016 Workshop in Pontremoli, Italy Title Quantum control of levitated optomechanics https://quantumlevitation.wordpress.com Organization Dr. A. Serafini, Dr. M. Genoni and Dr. J. Millen 8. September, 2015 International Workshop at Laboratory Nazionali in Frascati, Italy Title Is quantum theory exact? The endeavor of the theory beyond standard quantum mechanics - Second edition http:www.lnf.infn.it/conference/FQT2015 Organization Dr. A. Bassi, Dr. C.O. Curceanu, Dr. S. Donadi and Dr. K. Pisci- cchia 9. March, 2015 International Conference at Ettore Majorana Foundation in Erice, Italy Title Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics http:www.agenda.infn.it/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=9095 Organization Dr. A. Bassi and Dr. C.O. Curceanu 10. February, 2015 51 Winter School of Theoretical Physics in Ladek Zdroj, Poland Title Irreversible dynamics: nonlinear, nonlocal and non-Markovian mani- festations http:www.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~karp51 Organization Institut of Theoretical Physics in Wroclaw, Poland 1 Introduction When I look back to the time, already twenty years ago, when the concept and magnitude of the physical quantum of action began, for the first time [. ] the whole development [from the mass of experimental facts to its disclosure] seems to me to provide a fresh illustration of the long-since proved saying of Goethe’s that man errs as long as he strivesa. And the whole strenuous intellectual work of an industrious research worker would appear [. ] in vain and hopeless, if he were not occasionally through some striking facts to find that he had, at the end of all his criss-cross journeys, at last accomplished at least one step which was conclusively nearer the truth. aJohann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust, 1808. Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck Nobel Lecture, June 2, 1920 [1] The question: “How does a chicken move in the atmosphere?” would be typically answered by a physicist: “To start, let us approximate the problem by considering a spherical chicken in vacuum. ”. This is for sure a strong and rough approximation, however it can be a good starting point for solving the problem and in certain cases it is more than enough to properly describe the motion of the system of in- terest. Quantum mechanics is an example of a theory exhibiting a broad collection of theoretical results in complete agreement with experimental evidence: from the black body radiation [2–4] to the double slit experiment [5, 6], from the photo- electric effect [7–9] to the hydrogen atom, from interference fringes in a matter- wave interferometry experiment [10, 11] to Bose-Einstein condensates [12, 13] and many more. In some situations, the unitary dynamics of a quantum isolated sys- tem is not sufficient to well describe the system. One situation is of particular importance due to its ubiquity and unavoidability. Every realistic (quantum) sys- tem interacts with the surrounding environment and consequently is changed by it. In such a case, phenomena like dissipation, diffusion or decoherence emerge and may become important for the system dynamics. External influences on a quantum system must be considered explicitly to get a better description of Na- ture. This is the purpose of the theory of open quantum systems. In
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Conservation and the Correlation Quasi-Temperature in Open Quantum Dynamics
    Article Energy Conservation and the Correlation Quasi-Temperature in Open Quantum Dynamics Vladimir Morozov 1 and Vasyl’ Ignatyuk 2,* 1 MIREA-Russian Technological University, Vernadsky Av. 78, 119454 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 2 Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Svientsitskii Str. 1, 79011 Lviv, Ukraine * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +38-032-276-1054 Received: 25 October 2018; Accepted: 27 November 2018; Published: 30 November 2018 Abstract: The master equation for an open quantum system is derived in the weak-coupling approximation when the additional dynamical variable—the mean interaction energy—is included into the generic relevant statistical operator. This master equation is nonlocal in time and involves the “quasi-temperature”, which is a non- equilibrium state parameter conjugated thermodynamically to the mean interaction energy of the composite system. The evolution equation for the quasi-temperature is derived using the energy conservation law. Thus long-living dynamical correlations, which are associated with this conservation law and play an important role in transition to the Markovian regime and subsequent equilibration of the system, are properly taken into account. Keywords: open quantum system; master equation; non-equilibrium statistical operator; relevant statistical operator; quasi-temperature; dynamic correlations 1. Introduction In this paper, we continue the study of memory effects and nonequilibrium correlations in open quantum systems, which was initiated recently in Reference [1]. In the cited paper, the nonequilibrium statistical operator method (NSOM) developed by Zubarev [2–5] was used to derive the non-Markovian master equation for an open quantum system, taking into account memory effects and the evolution of an additional “relevant” variable—the mean interaction energy of the composite system (the open quantum system plus its environment).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Quant-Ph/0105127V3 19 Jun 2003
    DECOHERENCE, EINSELECTION, AND THE QUANTUM ORIGINS OF THE CLASSICAL Wojciech Hubert Zurek Theory Division, LANL, Mail Stop B288 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Decoherence is caused by the interaction with the en- A. The problem: Hilbert space is big 2 vironment which in effect monitors certain observables 1. Copenhagen Interpretation 2 of the system, destroying coherence between the pointer 2. Many Worlds Interpretation 3 B. Decoherence and einselection 3 states corresponding to their eigenvalues. This leads C. The nature of the resolution and the role of envariance4 to environment-induced superselection or einselection, a quantum process associated with selective loss of infor- D. Existential Interpretation and ‘Quantum Darwinism’4 mation. Einselected pointer states are stable. They can retain correlations with the rest of the Universe in spite II. QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS 5 of the environment. Einselection enforces classicality by A. Quantum conditional dynamics 5 imposing an effective ban on the vast majority of the 1. Controlled not and a bit-by-bit measurement 6 Hilbert space, eliminating especially the flagrantly non- 2. Measurements and controlled shifts. 7 local “Schr¨odinger cat” states. Classical structure of 3. Amplification 7 B. Information transfer in measurements 9 phase space emerges from the quantum Hilbert space in 1. Action per bit 9 the appropriate macroscopic limit: Combination of einse- C. “Collapse” analogue in a classical measurement 9 lection with dynamics leads to the idealizations of a point and of a classical trajectory. In measurements, einselec- III. CHAOS AND LOSS OF CORRESPONDENCE 11 tion replaces quantum entanglement between the appa- A. Loss of the quantum-classical correspondence 11 B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Toolbox in Python Release 2.2.0
    QuTiP: The Quantum Toolbox in Python Release 2.2.0 P.D. Nation and J.R. Johansson March 01, 2013 CONTENTS 1 Frontmatter 1 1.1 About This Documentation.....................................1 1.2 Citing This Project..........................................1 1.3 Funding................................................1 1.4 Contributing to QuTiP........................................2 2 About QuTiP 3 2.1 Brief Description...........................................3 2.2 Whats New in QuTiP Version 2.2..................................4 2.3 Whats New in QuTiP Version 2.1..................................4 2.4 Whats New in QuTiP Version 2.0..................................4 3 Installation 7 3.1 General Requirements........................................7 3.2 Get the software...........................................7 3.3 Installation on Ubuntu Linux.....................................8 3.4 Installation on Mac OS X (10.6+)..................................9 3.5 Installation on Windows....................................... 10 3.6 Verifying the Installation....................................... 11 3.7 Checking Version Information via the About Box.......................... 11 4 QuTiP Users Guide 13 4.1 Guide Overview........................................... 13 4.2 Basic Operations on Quantum Objects................................ 13 4.3 Manipulating States and Operators................................. 20 4.4 Using Tensor Products and Partial Traces.............................. 29 4.5 Time Evolution and Quantum System Dynamics.........................
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Ergodicity in Open Quantum Systems Through Quantum Feedback
    epl draft Non-Ergodicity in open quantum systems through quantum feedback Lewis A. Clark,1;4 Fiona Torzewska,2;4 Ben Maybee3;4 and Almut Beige4 1 Joint Quantum Centre (JQC) Durham-Newcastle, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom 2 The School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom 3 Higgs Centre for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK, United Kingdom 4 The School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom PACS 42.50.-p { Quantum optics PACS 42.50.Ar { Photon statistics and coherence theory PACS 42.50.Lc { Quantum fluctuations, quantum noise, and quantum jumps Abstract {It is well known that quantum feedback can alter the dynamics of open quantum systems dramatically. In this paper, we show that non-Ergodicity may be induced through quan- tum feedback and resultantly create system dynamics that have lasting dependence on initial conditions. To demonstrate this, we consider an optical cavity inside an instantaneous quantum feedback loop, which can be implemented relatively easily in the laboratory. Non-Ergodic quantum systems are of interest for applications in quantum information processing, quantum metrology and quantum sensing and could potentially aid the design of thermal machines whose efficiency is not limited by the laws of classical thermodynamics. Introduction. { Looking at the mechanical motion applicability of statistical-mechanical methods to quan- of individual particles, it is hard to see why ensembles tum physics [3]. Moreover, it has been shown that open of such particles should ever thermalise.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Networks Take on Open Quantum Systems
    VIEWPOINT Neural Networks Take on Open Quantum Systems Simulating a quantum system that exchanges energy with the outside world is notoriously hard, but the necessary computations might be easier with the help of neural networks. by Maria Schuld∗,y, Ilya Sinayskiyyy, and Francesco Petruccione{,k,∗∗ eural networks are behind technologies that are revolutionizing our daily lives, such as face recognition, web searching, and medical diagno- sis. These general problem solvers reach their Nsolutions by being adapted or “trained” to capture cor- relations in real-world data. Having seen the success of neural networks, physicists are asking if the tools might also be useful in areas ranging from high-energy physics to quantum computing [1]. Four research groups now re- port on using neural network tools to tackle one of the most Figure 1: Four teams have designed a neural network (right) that computationally challenging problems in condensed-matter can find the stationary steady states for an ``open'' quantum physics—simulating the behavior of an open many-body system (left). Their approach is built on neural network models for quantum system [2–5]. This scenario describes a collection of closed systems, where the wave function was represented by a particles—such as the qubits in a quantum computer—that statistical distribution over ``visible spins'' connected to a number of ``hidden spins.'' To extend the idea to an open system, three of both interact with each other and exchange energy with their the teams [3–5] added in a third set of ``ancillary spins,'' which environment. For certain open systems, the new work might capture correlations between the system and environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Decoherence in Quantum Computers: a Circuit-Design Perspective
    Study of Decoherence in Quantum Computers: A Circuit-Design Perspective Abdullah Ash- Saki Mahabubul Alam Swaroop Ghosh Electrical Engineering Electrical Engineering Electrical Engineering Pennsylvania State University Pennsylvania State University Pennsylvania State University University Park, USA University Park, USA University Park, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Decoherence of quantum states is a major hurdle interaction with environment [8]. The decoherence problem towards scalable and reliable quantum computing. Lower de- worsens with an increasing number of qubits. To mitigate coherence (i.e., higher fidelity) can alleviate the error correc- those, techniques like cryogenic cooling and error correction tion overhead and obviate the need for energy-intensive noise reduction techniques e.g., cryogenic cooling. In this paper, we code [9] are employed. However, these techniques are costly performed a noise-induced decoherence analysis of single and as cooling the qubits to ultra-low temperature (mili-Kelvin) re- multi-qubit quantum gates using physics-based simulations. The quires very high power (as much as 25kW) and error correction analysis indicates that (i) decoherence depends on the input requires many redundant physical qubits (one popular error state and the gate type. Larger number of j1i states worsen correction method named surface code incurs 18X overhead the decoherence; (ii) amplitude damping is more detrimental than phase damping; (iii) shorter depth implementation of a [10]). quantum function can achieve lower decoherence. Simulations Circuit level implications of decoherence are not well un- indicate 20% improvement in the fidelity of a quantum adder derstood. Therefore, a circuit level analysis of decoherence when realized using lower depth topology.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Thermodynamics of Single Particle Systems Md
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Quantum thermodynamics of single particle systems Md. Manirul Ali, Wei‑Ming Huang & Wei‑Min Zhang* Thermodynamics is built with the concept of equilibrium states. However, it is less clear how equilibrium thermodynamics emerges through the dynamics that follows the principle of quantum mechanics. In this paper, we develop a theory of quantum thermodynamics that is applicable for arbitrary small systems, even for single particle systems coupled with a reservoir. We generalize the concept of temperature beyond equilibrium that depends on the detailed dynamics of quantum states. We apply the theory to a cavity system and a two‑level system interacting with a reservoir, respectively. The results unravels (1) the emergence of thermodynamics naturally from the exact quantum dynamics in the weak system‑reservoir coupling regime without introducing the hypothesis of equilibrium between the system and the reservoir from the beginning; (2) the emergence of thermodynamics in the intermediate system‑reservoir coupling regime where the Born‑Markovian approximation is broken down; (3) the breakdown of thermodynamics due to the long-time non- Markovian memory efect arisen from the occurrence of localized bound states; (4) the existence of dynamical quantum phase transition characterized by infationary dynamics associated with negative dynamical temperature. The corresponding dynamical criticality provides a border separating classical and quantum worlds. The infationary dynamics may also relate to the origin of big bang and universe infation. And the third law of thermodynamics, allocated in the deep quantum realm, is naturally proved. In the past decade, many eforts have been devoted to understand how, starting from an isolated quantum system evolving under Hamiltonian dynamics, equilibration and efective thermodynamics emerge at long times1–5.
    [Show full text]
  • Exact N-Point Function Mapping Between Pairs of Experiments With
    Exact N -point function mapping between pairs of experiments with Markovian open quantum systems Etienne Wamba1;2;3;4, and Axel Pelster4 1 Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Buea, P.O. Box 63 Buea, Cameroon, 2 African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, P.O. Box 608 Limbe, Cameroon, 3 International Center for Theoretical Physics, 34151 Trieste, Italy, 4 Fachbereich Physik and State Research Center OPTIMAS, Technische Universit¨atKaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] September 11, 2020 Abstract We formulate an exact spacetime mapping between the N -point correlation functions of two different experiments with open quantum gases. Our formalism extends a quantum-field mapping result for closed systems [Phys. Rev. A 94, 043628 (2016)] to the general case of open quantum systems with Markovian property. For this, we consider an open many-body system consisting of a D-dimensional quantum gas of bosons or fermions that interacts with a bath under Born-Markov approximation and evolves according to a Lindblad master equation in a regime of loss or gain. Invoking the independence of expectation values on pictures of quantum mechanics and using the quantum fields that describe the gas dynamics, we derive the Heisenberg evolution of any arbitrary N -point function of the system in the regime when the Lindblad generators feature a loss or a gain. Our quantum field mapping for closed quantum systems is rewritten in the Schr¨odingerpicture and then extended to open quantum systems by relating onto each other two different evolutions of the N -point functions of the open quantum system.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2104.07823V2 [Quant-Ph] 3 Jun 2021
    Digital quantum simulation of open quantum systems using quantum imaginary time evolution Hirsh Kamakari,1 Shi-Ning Sun,1 Mario Motta,2 and Austin J. Minnich1, ∗ 1Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2IBM Quantum, IBM Research Almaden, San Jose, CA 95120, USA (Dated: June 4, 2021) Abstract Quantum simulation on emerging quantum hardware is a topic of intense interest. While many studies focus on computing ground state properties or simulating unitary dynamics of closed sys- tems, open quantum systems are an interesting target of study owing to their ubiquity and rich physical behavior. However, their non-unitary dynamics are also not natural to simulate on digital quantum devices. Here, we report algorithms for the digital quantum simulation of the dynam- ics of open quantum systems governed by a Lindblad equation using adaptations of the quantum imaginary time evolution (QITE) algorithm. We demonstrate the algorithms on IBM Quantum's hardware with simulations of the spontaneous emission of a two level system and the dissipative transverse field Ising model. Our work advances efforts to simulate the dynamics of open quantum systems on near-term quantum hardware. arXiv:2104.07823v2 [quant-ph] 3 Jun 2021 ∗ [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION The development of quantum algorithms to simulate the dynamics of quantum many- body systems is now a topic of interest owing to advances in quantum hardware [1{3]. While the real-time evolution of closed quantum systems on digital quantum computers has been extensively studied in the context of spin models [4{10], fermionic systems [11, 12], electron- phonon interactions [13], and quantum field theories [14{16], fewer studies have considered the time evolution of open quantum systems, which exhibit rich dynamical behavior due to coupling of the system to its environment [17, 18].
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Thermodynamics: a Dynamical Viewpoint
    Entropy 2013, 15, 2100-2128; doi:10.3390/e15062100 OPEN ACCESS entropy ISSN 1099-4300 www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy Review Quantum Thermodynamics: A Dynamical Viewpoint Ronnie Kosloff Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: + 972-26585485; Fax: + 972-26513742 Received: 26 March 2013; in revised form: 21 May 2013 / Accepted: 23 May 2013 / Published: 29 May 2013 Abstract: Quantum thermodynamics addresses the emergence of thermodynamic laws from quantum mechanics. The viewpoint advocated is based on the intimate connection of quan- tum thermodynamics with the theory of open quantum systems. Quantum mechanics inserts dynamics into thermodynamics, giving a sound foundation to finite-time-thermodynamics. The emergence of the 0-law, I-law, II-law and III-law of thermodynamics from quantum considerations is presented. The emphasis is on consistency between the two theories, which address the same subject from different foundations. We claim that inconsistency is the result of faulty analysis, pointing to flaws in approximations. Keywords: thermodynamics; open quantum systems; heat engines; refrigerators; quantum devices; finite time thermodynamics 1. Introduction Quantum thermodynamics is the study of thermodynamic processes within the context of quantum dynamics. Thermodynamics preceded quantum mechanics; consistency with thermodynamics led to Planck’s law, the dawn of quantum theory. Following the ideas of Planck on black body radiation, Einstein (1905) quantized the electromagnetic field [1]. Quantum thermodynamics is devoted to unraveling the intimate connection between the laws of thermodynamics and their quantum origin, requiring consistency. For many decades, the two theories developed separately. An exception is the study of Scovil et al.[2,3], which showed the equivalence of the Carnot engine [4] with the three level Maser, setting the stage for new developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Thermodynamics of Single Particle Systems
    Quantum thermodynamics of single particle systems Md. Manirul Ali,1, ∗ Wei-Ming Huang,1 and Wei-Min Zhang1, † 1Department of Physics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan Abstract Classical thermodynamics is built with the concept of equilibrium states. However, it is less clear how equilibrium thermodynamics emerges through the dynamics that follows the principle of quantum mechanics. In this paper, we develop a theory to study the exact nonequilibrium thermodynamics of quantum systems that is applicable to arbitrary small systems, even for single particle systems, in contact with a reservoir. We generalize the concept of temperature into nonequilibrium regime that depends on the detailed dynamics of quantum states. When we apply the theory to the cavity system and the two-level atomic system interacting with a heat reservoir, the exact nonequilibrium theory unravels unambiguously (1) the emergence of classical ther- modynamics from quantum dynamics in the weak system-reservoir coupling regime, without introducing equilibrium hypothesis; (2) the breakdown of classical thermo- dynamics in the strong coupling regime, which is induced by non-Markovian memory dynamics; and (3) the occurrence of dynamical quantum phase transition character- ized by inflationary dynamics associated with a negative nonequilibrium temperature, from which the third law of thermodynamics, allocated in the deep quantum realm, is naturally proved. The corresponding dynamical criticality provides the border sep- arating the classical and quantum thermodynamics. The inflationary dynamics may arXiv:1803.04658v3 [quant-ph] 17 Dec 2018 also provide a simple picture for the origin of big bang and universe inflation. ∗ [email protected] † [email protected] 1 Introduction Recent development in the field of open quantum systems initiates a renewed interest on the issue of quantum thermodynamics taking place under nonequilibrium situations [1–8].
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Theory of the Classical
    QUANTUM THEORY OF THE CLASSICAL Wojciech Hubert Zurek (to be continued by Mike Zwolak and Jess Ridel) “BEYOND DECOHERENCE” Quantum Jumps (discrete outcomes from unitary evolutions) Quantum Origins of Probability (from entanglement) Quantum Darwinism (the origin of “objective reality”) WHZ, Nature Physics March 2009 Quantum Theory of the Classical PROGRAM: Take the core “quantum” postulates of textbook * quantum theory and investigate whether they can account for the quantum-classical transition. 0. State of a composite system is a vector in the Q tensor product of constituent Hilbert spaces. U C 1. States correspond to vectors in Hilbert space. A R (“Quantum Superposition Principle”) N E 2. Evolutions are unitary (e.g. generated by T D Schroedinger equation). (“Unitarity”) U O 3. Immediate repetition of a measurement } M yields the same outcome. (“Repeatability”) 4. (a) Outcomes are restricted to orthonormal states {|sk>} (eigenstates of the measured observable). (b) One outcome is seen each time. 2 5. Probability of an outcome |sk> given state |ƒ> is pk=|<sk|ƒ>| . (“Born’s Rule”) *Postulates according to Dirac DECOHERENCE, POINTER BASIS, AND EINSELECTION* S E H , σ σ = 0 [ SE i i ] ⎛ ⎞ Interaction α σ ⊗ ε = Φ t EntanglementH i i SE ( ) ΦSE (0) = ψS ⊗ ε0 = ⎜ α i σ i ⎟ ⊗ ε0 SE ∑ i ∑ i ⎝ i ⎠ 2 REDUCED DENSITY MATRIX ρS (t) = TrE ΦSE (t) ΦSE (t) = ∑α i σ i σ i € i EINSELECTION* leads to POINTER STATES Stable states, tend to appear near diagonal€ of ρ t after decoherence time; € S ( ) Pointer states are effectively€ classical! They preserve correlations: they are left unperturbed€ by the “environmental monitoring”.
    [Show full text]