DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Documentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Documentation QuTiP: Quantum Toolbox in Python Release 4.3.0 P.D. Nation, J.R. Johansson, A.J.G. Pitchford, C. Granade, and A.L. Grimsmo Feb 26, 2019 Contents 1 Frontmatter 3 1.1 About This Documentation.....................................3 1.2 Citing This Project..........................................3 1.3 Funding................................................3 1.4 About QuTiP.............................................4 1.5 Contributing to QuTiP........................................5 2 Installation 7 2.1 General Requirements........................................7 2.2 Platform-independent Installation..................................7 2.2.1 Building your Conda environment.............................8 2.2.2 Adding the conda-forge channel..............................8 2.3 Installing via pip...........................................8 2.4 Installing from Source........................................9 2.5 Installation on MS Windows.....................................9 2.5.1 Windows and Python 2.7.................................. 10 2.6 Verifying the Installation....................................... 10 2.7 Checking Version Information using the About Function...................... 10 3 Users Guide 11 3.1 Guide Overview........................................... 11 3.1.1 Organization........................................ 11 3.2 Basic Operations on Quantum Objects................................ 12 3.2.1 First things first....................................... 12 3.2.2 The quantum object class.................................. 13 3.2.3 Functions operating on Qobj class............................. 17 3.3 Manipulating States and Operators................................. 20 3.3.1 Introduction......................................... 20 3.3.2 State Vectors (kets or bras)................................. 20 3.3.3 Density matrices...................................... 24 3.3.4 Qubit (two-level) systems.................................. 26 3.3.5 Expectation values..................................... 27 3.3.6 Superoperators and Vectorized Operators......................... 29 3.3.7 Choi, Kraus, Stinespring and 휒 Representations...................... 31 3.3.8 Properties of Quantum Maps................................ 36 3.4 Using Tensor Products and Partial Traces.............................. 37 3.4.1 Tensor products....................................... 37 3.4.2 Example: Constructing composite Hamiltonians...................... 39 3.4.3 Partial trace......................................... 40 3.4.4 Superoperators and Tensor Manipulations......................... 41 3.5 Time Evolution and Quantum System Dynamics.......................... 42 3.5.1 Dynamics Simulation Results................................ 42 3.5.2 Lindblad Master Equation Solver.............................. 44 3.5.3 Monte Carlo Solver..................................... 50 3.5.4 Solving Problems with Time-dependent Hamiltonians................... 56 3.5.5 Bloch-Redfield master equation.............................. 65 3.5.6 Floquet Formalism..................................... 71 i 3.5.7 Permutational Invariance.................................. 80 3.5.8 Setting Options for the Dynamics Solvers......................... 82 3.6 Solving for Steady-State Solutions.................................. 83 3.6.1 Introduction......................................... 83 3.6.2 Steady State solvers in QuTiP............................... 84 3.6.3 Using the Steadystate Solver................................ 84 3.6.4 Additional Solver Arguments................................ 85 3.6.5 Example: Harmonic Oscillator in Thermal Bath...................... 86 3.7 An Overview of the Eseries Class.................................. 88 3.7.1 Exponential-series representation of time-dependent quantum objects.......... 88 3.7.2 Applications of exponential series............................. 90 3.8 Two-time correlation functions................................... 92 3.8.1 Steadystate correlation function.............................. 93 3.8.2 Emission spectrum..................................... 94 3.8.3 Non-steadystate correlation function............................ 95 3.9 Quantum Optimal Control...................................... 99 3.9.1 Introduction......................................... 99 3.9.2 Closed Quantum Systems.................................. 100 3.9.3 The GRAPE algorithm................................... 100 3.9.4 The CRAB Algorithm................................... 102 3.9.5 Optimal Quantum Control in QuTiP............................ 102 3.9.6 Using the pulseoptim functions............................... 103 3.10 Plotting on the Bloch Sphere..................................... 104 3.10.1 Introduction......................................... 104 3.10.2 The Bloch and Bloch3d Classes.............................. 104 3.10.3 Configuring the Bloch sphere................................ 114 3.10.4 Animating with the Bloch sphere.............................. 116 3.11 Visualization of quantum states and processes............................ 117 3.11.1 Fock-basis probability distribution............................. 118 3.11.2 Quasi-probability distributions............................... 119 3.11.3 Visualizing operators.................................... 122 3.11.4 Quantum process tomography............................... 124 3.12 Parallel computation......................................... 126 3.12.1 Parallel map and parallel for-loop............................. 126 3.12.2 IPython-based parallel_map................................ 128 3.13 Saving QuTiP Objects and Data Sets................................ 129 3.13.1 Storing and loading QuTiP objects............................. 129 3.13.2 Storing and loading datasets................................ 130 3.14 Generating Random Quantum States & Operators......................... 132 3.14.1 Random objects with a given eigen spectrum....................... 134 3.14.2 Composite random objects................................. 135 3.15 Modifying Internal QuTiP Settings................................. 135 3.15.1 User Accessible Parameters................................. 135 3.15.2 Example: Changing Settings................................ 136 3.15.3 Persistent Settings...................................... 136 4 API documentation 137 4.1 Classes................................................ 137 4.1.1 Qobj............................................. 137 4.1.2 eseries............................................ 146 4.1.3 Bloch sphere........................................ 147 4.1.4 Cubic Spline........................................ 149 4.1.5 Non-Markovian Solvers.................................. 150 4.1.6 Solver Options and Results................................. 153 4.1.7 Permutational Invariance.................................. 158 4.1.8 Distribution functions.................................... 161 4.1.9 Quantum information processing.............................. 163 4.1.10 Optimal control....................................... 167 ii 4.2 Functions............................................... 188 4.2.1 Manipulation and Creation of States and Operators.................... 188 4.2.2 Functions acting on states and operators.......................... 212 4.2.3 Dynamics and Time-Evolution............................... 218 4.2.4 Visualization........................................ 246 4.2.5 Quantum Information Processing.............................. 254 4.2.6 non-Markovian Solvers................................... 261 4.2.7 Optimal control....................................... 261 4.2.8 Utility Functions...................................... 275 5 Change Log 283 5.1 Version 4.3.0 (July 14, 2018)..................................... 283 5.1.1 Improvements........................................ 283 5.1.2 Bug Fixes.......................................... 283 5.2 Version 4.2.0 (July 28, 2017)..................................... 284 5.2.1 Improvements........................................ 284 5.2.2 Bug Fixes.......................................... 284 5.3 Version 4.1.0 (March 10, 2017)................................... 284 5.3.1 Improvements........................................ 284 5.3.2 Bug Fixes.......................................... 285 5.4 Version 4.0.2 (January 5, 2017)................................... 285 5.4.1 Bug Fixes.......................................... 285 5.5 Version 4.0.0 (December 22, 2016)................................. 285 5.5.1 Improvements........................................ 285 5.5.2 Bug Fixes.......................................... 285 5.6 Version 3.2.0 (Never officially released)............................... 285 5.6.1 New Features........................................ 285 5.6.2 Improvements........................................ 286 5.6.3 Bug Fixes.......................................... 287 5.7 Version 3.1.0 (January 1, 2015):................................... 288 5.7.1 New Features........................................ 288 5.7.2 Bug Fixes.......................................... 288 5.8 Version 3.0.1 (Aug 5, 2014):..................................... 289 5.8.1 Bug Fixes.......................................... 289 5.9 Version 3.0.0 (July 17, 2014):.................................... 289 5.9.1 New Features........................................ 289 5.9.2 Improvements........................................ 290 5.10 Version 2.2.0 (March 01, 2013):................................... 290 5.10.1 New Features.......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Conservation and the Correlation Quasi-Temperature in Open Quantum Dynamics
    Article Energy Conservation and the Correlation Quasi-Temperature in Open Quantum Dynamics Vladimir Morozov 1 and Vasyl’ Ignatyuk 2,* 1 MIREA-Russian Technological University, Vernadsky Av. 78, 119454 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 2 Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Svientsitskii Str. 1, 79011 Lviv, Ukraine * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +38-032-276-1054 Received: 25 October 2018; Accepted: 27 November 2018; Published: 30 November 2018 Abstract: The master equation for an open quantum system is derived in the weak-coupling approximation when the additional dynamical variable—the mean interaction energy—is included into the generic relevant statistical operator. This master equation is nonlocal in time and involves the “quasi-temperature”, which is a non- equilibrium state parameter conjugated thermodynamically to the mean interaction energy of the composite system. The evolution equation for the quasi-temperature is derived using the energy conservation law. Thus long-living dynamical correlations, which are associated with this conservation law and play an important role in transition to the Markovian regime and subsequent equilibration of the system, are properly taken into account. Keywords: open quantum system; master equation; non-equilibrium statistical operator; relevant statistical operator; quasi-temperature; dynamic correlations 1. Introduction In this paper, we continue the study of memory effects and nonequilibrium correlations in open quantum systems, which was initiated recently in Reference [1]. In the cited paper, the nonequilibrium statistical operator method (NSOM) developed by Zubarev [2–5] was used to derive the non-Markovian master equation for an open quantum system, taking into account memory effects and the evolution of an additional “relevant” variable—the mean interaction energy of the composite system (the open quantum system plus its environment).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Quant-Ph/0105127V3 19 Jun 2003
    DECOHERENCE, EINSELECTION, AND THE QUANTUM ORIGINS OF THE CLASSICAL Wojciech Hubert Zurek Theory Division, LANL, Mail Stop B288 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Decoherence is caused by the interaction with the en- A. The problem: Hilbert space is big 2 vironment which in effect monitors certain observables 1. Copenhagen Interpretation 2 of the system, destroying coherence between the pointer 2. Many Worlds Interpretation 3 B. Decoherence and einselection 3 states corresponding to their eigenvalues. This leads C. The nature of the resolution and the role of envariance4 to environment-induced superselection or einselection, a quantum process associated with selective loss of infor- D. Existential Interpretation and ‘Quantum Darwinism’4 mation. Einselected pointer states are stable. They can retain correlations with the rest of the Universe in spite II. QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS 5 of the environment. Einselection enforces classicality by A. Quantum conditional dynamics 5 imposing an effective ban on the vast majority of the 1. Controlled not and a bit-by-bit measurement 6 Hilbert space, eliminating especially the flagrantly non- 2. Measurements and controlled shifts. 7 local “Schr¨odinger cat” states. Classical structure of 3. Amplification 7 B. Information transfer in measurements 9 phase space emerges from the quantum Hilbert space in 1. Action per bit 9 the appropriate macroscopic limit: Combination of einse- C. “Collapse” analogue in a classical measurement 9 lection with dynamics leads to the idealizations of a point and of a classical trajectory. In measurements, einselec- III. CHAOS AND LOSS OF CORRESPONDENCE 11 tion replaces quantum entanglement between the appa- A. Loss of the quantum-classical correspondence 11 B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Toolbox in Python Release 2.2.0
    QuTiP: The Quantum Toolbox in Python Release 2.2.0 P.D. Nation and J.R. Johansson March 01, 2013 CONTENTS 1 Frontmatter 1 1.1 About This Documentation.....................................1 1.2 Citing This Project..........................................1 1.3 Funding................................................1 1.4 Contributing to QuTiP........................................2 2 About QuTiP 3 2.1 Brief Description...........................................3 2.2 Whats New in QuTiP Version 2.2..................................4 2.3 Whats New in QuTiP Version 2.1..................................4 2.4 Whats New in QuTiP Version 2.0..................................4 3 Installation 7 3.1 General Requirements........................................7 3.2 Get the software...........................................7 3.3 Installation on Ubuntu Linux.....................................8 3.4 Installation on Mac OS X (10.6+)..................................9 3.5 Installation on Windows....................................... 10 3.6 Verifying the Installation....................................... 11 3.7 Checking Version Information via the About Box.......................... 11 4 QuTiP Users Guide 13 4.1 Guide Overview........................................... 13 4.2 Basic Operations on Quantum Objects................................ 13 4.3 Manipulating States and Operators................................. 20 4.4 Using Tensor Products and Partial Traces.............................. 29 4.5 Time Evolution and Quantum System Dynamics.........................
    [Show full text]
  • Jupyter Notebooks—A Publishing Format for Reproducible Computational Workflows
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elpub digital library Jupyter Notebooks—a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows Thomas KLUYVERa,1, Benjamin RAGAN-KELLEYb,1, Fernando PÉREZc, Brian GRANGERd, Matthias BUSSONNIERc, Jonathan FREDERICd, Kyle KELLEYe, Jessica HAMRICKc, Jason GROUTf, Sylvain CORLAYf, Paul IVANOVg, Damián h i d j AVILA , Safia ABDALLA , Carol WILLING and Jupyter Development Team a University of Southampton, UK b Simula Research Lab, Norway c University of California, Berkeley, USA d California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, USA e Rackspace f Bloomberg LP g Disqus h Continuum Analytics i Project Jupyter j Worldwide Abstract. It is increasingly necessary for researchers in all fields to write computer code, and in order to reproduce research results, it is important that this code is published. We present Jupyter notebooks, a document format for publishing code, results and explanations in a form that is both readable and executable. We discuss various tools and use cases for notebook documents. Keywords. Notebook, reproducibility, research code 1. Introduction Researchers today across all academic disciplines often need to write computer code in order to collect and process data, carry out statistical tests, run simulations or draw figures. The widely applicable libraries and tools for this are often developed as open source projects (such as NumPy, Julia, or FEniCS), but the specific code researchers write for a particular piece of work is often left unpublished, hindering reproducibility. Some authors may describe computational methods in prose, as part of a general description of research methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Ergodicity in Open Quantum Systems Through Quantum Feedback
    epl draft Non-Ergodicity in open quantum systems through quantum feedback Lewis A. Clark,1;4 Fiona Torzewska,2;4 Ben Maybee3;4 and Almut Beige4 1 Joint Quantum Centre (JQC) Durham-Newcastle, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom 2 The School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom 3 Higgs Centre for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK, United Kingdom 4 The School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom PACS 42.50.-p { Quantum optics PACS 42.50.Ar { Photon statistics and coherence theory PACS 42.50.Lc { Quantum fluctuations, quantum noise, and quantum jumps Abstract {It is well known that quantum feedback can alter the dynamics of open quantum systems dramatically. In this paper, we show that non-Ergodicity may be induced through quan- tum feedback and resultantly create system dynamics that have lasting dependence on initial conditions. To demonstrate this, we consider an optical cavity inside an instantaneous quantum feedback loop, which can be implemented relatively easily in the laboratory. Non-Ergodic quantum systems are of interest for applications in quantum information processing, quantum metrology and quantum sensing and could potentially aid the design of thermal machines whose efficiency is not limited by the laws of classical thermodynamics. Introduction. { Looking at the mechanical motion applicability of statistical-mechanical methods to quan- of individual particles, it is hard to see why ensembles tum physics [3]. Moreover, it has been shown that open of such particles should ever thermalise.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Networks Take on Open Quantum Systems
    VIEWPOINT Neural Networks Take on Open Quantum Systems Simulating a quantum system that exchanges energy with the outside world is notoriously hard, but the necessary computations might be easier with the help of neural networks. by Maria Schuld∗,y, Ilya Sinayskiyyy, and Francesco Petruccione{,k,∗∗ eural networks are behind technologies that are revolutionizing our daily lives, such as face recognition, web searching, and medical diagno- sis. These general problem solvers reach their Nsolutions by being adapted or “trained” to capture cor- relations in real-world data. Having seen the success of neural networks, physicists are asking if the tools might also be useful in areas ranging from high-energy physics to quantum computing [1]. Four research groups now re- port on using neural network tools to tackle one of the most Figure 1: Four teams have designed a neural network (right) that computationally challenging problems in condensed-matter can find the stationary steady states for an ``open'' quantum physics—simulating the behavior of an open many-body system (left). Their approach is built on neural network models for quantum system [2–5]. This scenario describes a collection of closed systems, where the wave function was represented by a particles—such as the qubits in a quantum computer—that statistical distribution over ``visible spins'' connected to a number of ``hidden spins.'' To extend the idea to an open system, three of both interact with each other and exchange energy with their the teams [3–5] added in a third set of ``ancillary spins,'' which environment. For certain open systems, the new work might capture correlations between the system and environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Decoherence in Quantum Computers: a Circuit-Design Perspective
    Study of Decoherence in Quantum Computers: A Circuit-Design Perspective Abdullah Ash- Saki Mahabubul Alam Swaroop Ghosh Electrical Engineering Electrical Engineering Electrical Engineering Pennsylvania State University Pennsylvania State University Pennsylvania State University University Park, USA University Park, USA University Park, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Decoherence of quantum states is a major hurdle interaction with environment [8]. The decoherence problem towards scalable and reliable quantum computing. Lower de- worsens with an increasing number of qubits. To mitigate coherence (i.e., higher fidelity) can alleviate the error correc- those, techniques like cryogenic cooling and error correction tion overhead and obviate the need for energy-intensive noise reduction techniques e.g., cryogenic cooling. In this paper, we code [9] are employed. However, these techniques are costly performed a noise-induced decoherence analysis of single and as cooling the qubits to ultra-low temperature (mili-Kelvin) re- multi-qubit quantum gates using physics-based simulations. The quires very high power (as much as 25kW) and error correction analysis indicates that (i) decoherence depends on the input requires many redundant physical qubits (one popular error state and the gate type. Larger number of j1i states worsen correction method named surface code incurs 18X overhead the decoherence; (ii) amplitude damping is more detrimental than phase damping; (iii) shorter depth implementation of a [10]). quantum function can achieve lower decoherence. Simulations Circuit level implications of decoherence are not well un- indicate 20% improvement in the fidelity of a quantum adder derstood. Therefore, a circuit level analysis of decoherence when realized using lower depth topology.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1110.0573V2 [Quant-Ph] 22 Nov 2011 Equation Or Monte-Carlo Wave Function Method
    QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems J. R. Johanssona,1,∗, P. D. Nationa,b,1,∗, Franco Noria,b aAdvanced Science Institute, RIKEN, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan bDepartment of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1040, USA Abstract We present an object-oriented open-source framework for solving the dynamics of open quantum systems written in Python. Arbitrary Hamiltonians, including time-dependent systems, may be built up from operators and states defined by a quantum object class, and then passed on to a choice of master equation or Monte-Carlo solvers. We give an overview of the basic structure for the framework before detailing the numerical simulation of open system dynamics. Several examples are given to illustrate the build up to a complete calculation. Finally, we measure the performance of our library against that of current implementations. The framework described here is particularly well-suited to the fields of quantum optics, superconducting circuit devices, nanomechanics, and trapped ions, while also being ideal for use in classroom instruction. Keywords: Open quantum systems, Lindblad master equation, Quantum Monte-Carlo, Python PACS: 03.65.Yz, 07.05.Tp, 01.50.hv PROGRAM SUMMARY 1. Introduction Manuscript Title: QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems Every quantum system encountered in the real world is Authors: J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation an open quantum system [1]. For although much care is Program Title: QuTiP: The Quantum Toolbox in Python taken experimentally to eliminate the unwanted influence Journal Reference: of external interactions, there remains, if ever so slight, Catalogue identifier: a coupling between the system of interest and the exter- Licensing provisions: GPLv3 nal world.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Thermodynamics of Single Particle Systems Md
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Quantum thermodynamics of single particle systems Md. Manirul Ali, Wei‑Ming Huang & Wei‑Min Zhang* Thermodynamics is built with the concept of equilibrium states. However, it is less clear how equilibrium thermodynamics emerges through the dynamics that follows the principle of quantum mechanics. In this paper, we develop a theory of quantum thermodynamics that is applicable for arbitrary small systems, even for single particle systems coupled with a reservoir. We generalize the concept of temperature beyond equilibrium that depends on the detailed dynamics of quantum states. We apply the theory to a cavity system and a two‑level system interacting with a reservoir, respectively. The results unravels (1) the emergence of thermodynamics naturally from the exact quantum dynamics in the weak system‑reservoir coupling regime without introducing the hypothesis of equilibrium between the system and the reservoir from the beginning; (2) the emergence of thermodynamics in the intermediate system‑reservoir coupling regime where the Born‑Markovian approximation is broken down; (3) the breakdown of thermodynamics due to the long-time non- Markovian memory efect arisen from the occurrence of localized bound states; (4) the existence of dynamical quantum phase transition characterized by infationary dynamics associated with negative dynamical temperature. The corresponding dynamical criticality provides a border separating classical and quantum worlds. The infationary dynamics may also relate to the origin of big bang and universe infation. And the third law of thermodynamics, allocated in the deep quantum realm, is naturally proved. In the past decade, many eforts have been devoted to understand how, starting from an isolated quantum system evolving under Hamiltonian dynamics, equilibration and efective thermodynamics emerge at long times1–5.
    [Show full text]
  • Exact N-Point Function Mapping Between Pairs of Experiments With
    Exact N -point function mapping between pairs of experiments with Markovian open quantum systems Etienne Wamba1;2;3;4, and Axel Pelster4 1 Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Buea, P.O. Box 63 Buea, Cameroon, 2 African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, P.O. Box 608 Limbe, Cameroon, 3 International Center for Theoretical Physics, 34151 Trieste, Italy, 4 Fachbereich Physik and State Research Center OPTIMAS, Technische Universit¨atKaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] September 11, 2020 Abstract We formulate an exact spacetime mapping between the N -point correlation functions of two different experiments with open quantum gases. Our formalism extends a quantum-field mapping result for closed systems [Phys. Rev. A 94, 043628 (2016)] to the general case of open quantum systems with Markovian property. For this, we consider an open many-body system consisting of a D-dimensional quantum gas of bosons or fermions that interacts with a bath under Born-Markov approximation and evolves according to a Lindblad master equation in a regime of loss or gain. Invoking the independence of expectation values on pictures of quantum mechanics and using the quantum fields that describe the gas dynamics, we derive the Heisenberg evolution of any arbitrary N -point function of the system in the regime when the Lindblad generators feature a loss or a gain. Our quantum field mapping for closed quantum systems is rewritten in the Schr¨odingerpicture and then extended to open quantum systems by relating onto each other two different evolutions of the N -point functions of the open quantum system.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2104.07823V2 [Quant-Ph] 3 Jun 2021
    Digital quantum simulation of open quantum systems using quantum imaginary time evolution Hirsh Kamakari,1 Shi-Ning Sun,1 Mario Motta,2 and Austin J. Minnich1, ∗ 1Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2IBM Quantum, IBM Research Almaden, San Jose, CA 95120, USA (Dated: June 4, 2021) Abstract Quantum simulation on emerging quantum hardware is a topic of intense interest. While many studies focus on computing ground state properties or simulating unitary dynamics of closed sys- tems, open quantum systems are an interesting target of study owing to their ubiquity and rich physical behavior. However, their non-unitary dynamics are also not natural to simulate on digital quantum devices. Here, we report algorithms for the digital quantum simulation of the dynam- ics of open quantum systems governed by a Lindblad equation using adaptations of the quantum imaginary time evolution (QITE) algorithm. We demonstrate the algorithms on IBM Quantum's hardware with simulations of the spontaneous emission of a two level system and the dissipative transverse field Ising model. Our work advances efforts to simulate the dynamics of open quantum systems on near-term quantum hardware. arXiv:2104.07823v2 [quant-ph] 3 Jun 2021 ∗ [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION The development of quantum algorithms to simulate the dynamics of quantum many- body systems is now a topic of interest owing to advances in quantum hardware [1{3]. While the real-time evolution of closed quantum systems on digital quantum computers has been extensively studied in the context of spin models [4{10], fermionic systems [11, 12], electron- phonon interactions [13], and quantum field theories [14{16], fewer studies have considered the time evolution of open quantum systems, which exhibit rich dynamical behavior due to coupling of the system to its environment [17, 18].
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Thermodynamics: a Dynamical Viewpoint
    Entropy 2013, 15, 2100-2128; doi:10.3390/e15062100 OPEN ACCESS entropy ISSN 1099-4300 www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy Review Quantum Thermodynamics: A Dynamical Viewpoint Ronnie Kosloff Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: + 972-26585485; Fax: + 972-26513742 Received: 26 March 2013; in revised form: 21 May 2013 / Accepted: 23 May 2013 / Published: 29 May 2013 Abstract: Quantum thermodynamics addresses the emergence of thermodynamic laws from quantum mechanics. The viewpoint advocated is based on the intimate connection of quan- tum thermodynamics with the theory of open quantum systems. Quantum mechanics inserts dynamics into thermodynamics, giving a sound foundation to finite-time-thermodynamics. The emergence of the 0-law, I-law, II-law and III-law of thermodynamics from quantum considerations is presented. The emphasis is on consistency between the two theories, which address the same subject from different foundations. We claim that inconsistency is the result of faulty analysis, pointing to flaws in approximations. Keywords: thermodynamics; open quantum systems; heat engines; refrigerators; quantum devices; finite time thermodynamics 1. Introduction Quantum thermodynamics is the study of thermodynamic processes within the context of quantum dynamics. Thermodynamics preceded quantum mechanics; consistency with thermodynamics led to Planck’s law, the dawn of quantum theory. Following the ideas of Planck on black body radiation, Einstein (1905) quantized the electromagnetic field [1]. Quantum thermodynamics is devoted to unraveling the intimate connection between the laws of thermodynamics and their quantum origin, requiring consistency. For many decades, the two theories developed separately. An exception is the study of Scovil et al.[2,3], which showed the equivalence of the Carnot engine [4] with the three level Maser, setting the stage for new developments.
    [Show full text]