DOCSLIB.ORG

Southeast Alaska Area Contingency Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southeast Alaska Area Contingency Plan SOUTHEAST ALASKA AREA CONTINGENCY PLAN DRAFT Page | 1 APPROVAL LETTER [Insert text of approval letter, to be signed by FOSC & SOSC] DRAFT Page | 2 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL [Insert text of approval letter, to be signed by FOSC & SOSC, if appropriate] DRAFT Page | 3 RECORD OF CHANGES [Insert table to track record of changes] DRAFT Page | 4 Table of Contents APPROVAL LETTER .............................................................................................................................2 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ...................................................................................................................3 RECORD OF CHANGES ........................................................................................................................4 TABLE OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... 11 1000 – INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 12 1100 – INTRODUCTION/AUTHORITY ........................................................................................................ 12 1200 – GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARIES .......................................................................................................... 14 1210 – GEOGRAPHIC PLANNING BOUNDARIES..................................................................................................... 14 1220 – GEOGRAPHIC RESPONSE BOUNDARIES ..................................................................................................... 15 1300 – AREA COMMITTEE ..................................................................................................................... 19 1310 – AREA COMMITTEE STAKEHOLDERS, NAMES, ORGANIZATION & CONTACT INFORMATION - TBD ....................... 20 1320 – PURPOSE - TBD ................................................................................................................................... 20 1330 – ORGANIZATION.................................................................................................................................... 20 1340 – CHARTER MEMBERS - TBD .................................................................................................................... 20 1400 – NATIONAL RESPONSE SYSTEM (NRS) - TBD .................................................................................... 20 1410 – NATIONAL RESPONSE STRUCTURE - TBD ................................................................................................. 20 1420 – REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM (RRT) STRUCTURE ......................................................................................... 21 1430 – SOUTHEAST ALASKA (SEAK) AREA RESPONSE STRUCTURE .......................................................................... 21 1440 – INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM (ICS) ........................................................................................................ 22 1450 – AREA EXERCISE MECHANISM ................................................................................................................. 23 1460 – NATIONAL RESPONSE FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................ 23 1470 – FEDERAL RADIOLOGICAL RESPONSE PLAN ................................................................................................ 23 1500 – STATE/LOCAL RESPONSE SYSTEM - TBD ......................................................................................... 23 1600 – NATIONAL POLICY AND DOCTRINE - TBD ........................................................................................ 23 1610 – PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE RESOURCE UTILIZATION - TBD ................................................................................... 23 1620 – BEST RESPONSE CONCEPT - TBD ............................................................................................................ 23 1630 – CLEANUP ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL .......................................................................................................... 23 1640 – ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE TECHNOLOGIES .................................................................................................. 24 1650 – FISH AND WILDLIFE ACTS COMPLIANCE ................................................................................................... 24 1660 – PROTECTION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES (NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT (NHPA)) ............................ 24 1700 – RESERVED ................................................................................................................................24 1800 – RESERVED ................................................................................................................................24 1900 – RESERVED FOR AREA/DISTRICT ..................................................................................................... 24 2000 – COMMAND ........................................................................................................................... 25 2100 – UNIFIED COMMAND (UC) ........................................................................................................... 25 2110 – COMMAND REPRESENTATIVES ............................................................................................................... 27 DRAFT Page | 5 2120 – UNIFIED COMMAND STAFF .................................................................................................................... 29 2130 – GUIDANCE FOR SETTING RESPONSE OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................... 30 2140 – GENERAL RESPONSE PRIORITIES .............................................................................................................. 31 2200 – SAFETY ...................................................................................................................................33 2210 – SITE CHARACTERIZATION ....................................................................................................................... 34 2220 – SITE SAFETY PLAN DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................... 34 2230 – OSHA TRAINING FOR VOLUNTEERS ........................................................................................................ 47 2300 – INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................... 47 2310 – PROTOCOL FOR ACCESS/TIMING OF MEDIA BRIEFINGS ............................................................................... 47 2320 – JOINT INFORMATION CENTER (JIC) ......................................................................................................... 57 2330 – MEDIA CONTACTS ................................................................................................................................ 60 2340 – SAMPLES ............................................................................................................................................ 64 2400 – LIAISON...................................................................................................................................70 2410 – INVESTIGATORS ................................................................................................................................... 70 2420 – FEDERAL/STATE/LOCAL TRUSTEES .......................................................................................................... 70 2430 – AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES .................................................................................................................... 70 2440 – STAKEHOLDERS .................................................................................................................................... 70 2450 – NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES .............................................................................................................. 75 2460 – NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (NRDA) ................................................................................ 75 2500 – RESERVED ................................................................................................................................75 2600 – RESERVED ................................................................................................................................75 2700 – RESERVED ................................................................................................................................75 2800 – RESERVED ................................................................................................................................75 2900 – RESERVED FOR AREA/DISTRICT ..................................................................................................... 75 3000 – OPERATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 76 3100 – OPERATIONS SECTION ORGANIZATION............................................................................................ 76 3110 – ORGANIZATION OPTIONS ...................................................................................................................... 76 3120 – CONSIDERATIONS FOR BUILDING THE OPERATIONS SECTION - TBD .............................................................. 76 3200 – RECOVERY AND PROTECTION .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capital Project Summary Department of Transportation and Public Facilities FY2007 Governor Amended Reference No: 41919 4/28/06 2:59:44 PM Page: 1
    Gravina Island Bridge FY2007 Request: $91,000,000 Reference No: 41919 AP/AL: Allocation Project Type: Construction Category: Transportation Location: Ketchikan Contact: John MacKinnon House District: Ketchikan Contact Phone: (907)465-6973 Estimated Project Dates: 07/01/2006 - 06/03/2011 Appropriation: Congressional Earmarks Brief Summary and Statement of Need: Improve surface access between Ketchikan and Gravina Island, including the Ketchikan International Airport. This project contributes to the Department's Mission by reducing injuries, fatalities and property damage, by improving the mobility of people and goods and by increasing private investment. Funding: FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 Total Fed Rcpts $91,000,000 $91,000,000 Total: $91,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $91,000,000 State Match Required One-Time Project Phased - new Phased - underway On-Going 9% = Minimum State Match % Required Amendment Mental Health Bill Operating & Maintenance Costs: Amount Staff Project Development: 0 0 Ongoing Operating: 0 0 One-Time Startup: 0 Totals: 0 0 Additional Information / Prior Funding History: FY2005 - $215,000,000; FY2002 - $20,000,000; FY1999 - $20,200,000. Project Description/Justification: The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT&PF), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to start the final step toward constructing access from Revillagigedo (Revilla) Island to Gravina Island in Southeast Alaska. It is intended to provide a roadway link from Ketchikan to Gravina Island across the Ralph M. Bartholomew Veterans' Memorial Bridges over two channels of Tongass Narrows. Pennock Island in the Narrows is also now accessible. The proposed Gravina Island Highway begins as the Airport Access Road at the Ketchikan International Airport parking lot on Gravina Island and extends south around the end of the present day runway and up the hill to an intersection with Gravina Island Highway and Lewis Reef Road.
    [Show full text]
  • The Folly of Wisdom Preacher: Rev
    The Folly of Wisdom Preacher: Rev. Jill Olds Date: February 23, 2014 20:29 Let us pray. Holy One, guide our hearts towards compassion, and guide our minds towards understanding. And may the words of my mouth and the meditations of all of our hearts and minds together be acceptable in Your sight, O Lord our Rock and our Redeemer, through Jesus Christ we pray, Amen. In September of 2008, on a tiny strip of land in Alaska known as Gravina Island, workers put down their shovels, and parked their steamrollers for the last time. The road was completed. And this was not just any road. The road now known as Gravina Island Highway was nearly thirty years in the making—research began in the 1980s, the intention being to connect the nearby town of Ketchikan with the airport located on the island, about a mile and a half away, thus eliminating the need for a ferry service that carried some 350,000 people every year. The completed road—3.2 miles long—started at the airport and was destined to be connected to the Gravina Island Bridge. Except, herein lies the rub. If you go visit the road today, you’ll start at the airport and, 3.2 miles later, you’ll wind up in a dead-end cul-de-sac. The bridge, which was to cost a whopping $398 million, was never approved of by Congress, and so the project has been indefinitely shelved. But here’s the real kicker—the powers-that-be in Alaska knew before the road was begun that the bridge would never be constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Infrastructure Needs in Alaska
    S. HRG. 108–349 TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS IN ALASKA FIELD HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON OVERSIGHT OF THE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMS IN THE STATE OF ALASKA APRIL 14, 2003—PALMER, ALASKA Printed for the use of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 92–373 PDF WASHINGTON : 2004 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma, Chairman JOHN W. WARNER, Virginia JAMES M. JEFFORDS, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri MAX BAUCUS, Montana GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio HARRY REID, Nevada MICHAEL D. CRAPO, Idaho BOB GRAHAM, Florida LINCOLN CHAFEE, Rhode Island JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut JOHN CORNYN, Texaa BARBARA BOXER, California LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska RON WYDEN, Oregon CRAIG THOMAS, Wyoming THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, New York ANDREW WHEELER, Majority Staff Director KEN CONNOLLY, Minority Staff Director (II) CONTENTS Page APRIL 14, 2003—PALMER, ALASKA OPENING STATEMENTS Murkowski, Hon. Lisa, U.S. Senator from the State of Alaska ........................... 1 WITNESSES Anderson, Hon. Tim, Mayor, Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska ................... 20 Angasan, Trefon, Co-Chair, Board of Directors, Alaska Federation of Natives . 10 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 38 Barton, Michael, Commissioner, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities .................................................................................................... 6 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 35 Boyles, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • $315 Million Bridge to Nowhere Rep. Don Young (R-AK) Is Trying to Sell
    $315 Million Bridge to Nowhere February 9, 2005 Rep. Don Young (R-AK) is trying to sell America’s taxpayers a $315 million “bridge to nowhere” in rural Alaska. As Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, he is in a very good position to get his way. But Rep. Young should be stopped from using his political clout to force federal taxpayers to pay for a bridge that is ridiculous in its scope, unjustified on its merits, and far too expensive for taxpayers to swallow at a time of record federal deficits. If Rep. Young succeeds, tiny Ketchikan, Alaska, a town with less than 8,000 residents (about 13,000 if the entire county is included) will receive hundreds of millions of federal dollars to build a bridge to Gravina Island (population: 50). This bridge will be nearly as long as the Golden Gate Bridge and taller than the Brooklyn Bridge. The Gravina Bridge would replace a 7-minute ferry ride from Ketchikan to Ketchikan Airport on Gravina Island. Project proponents tell the public that the bridge is a transportation necessity, though the ferry system adequately handles passenger traffic between the islands, including traffic to and from the airport.1 Some herald the project as the savior of Ketchikan because it will open up land on Pennock Island to residential development, despite the fact that Gravina’s population has been shrinking. 1 Alaska Airlines, the only commercial passenger airline that flies to Ketchikan, runs seven daily flight routes in the summer and six in the winter. Two ferries, which run every 15 minutes in the summer and every 30 minutes in the winter, provide transportation to and from the airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice Federal Communications Commission 1919 M Street N.W
    PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 1919 M STREET N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 3667 News media information 202/632·5050. Recorded fisling of releases and texts 202/632-0002. June 18, 1990 Reclassification of Certain FM Facilities Re: MM Docket No. 88-375 The rules adopted in the First Report and Order in MM Docket 88-375, 54 Fed. Reg. 16363 (April 24, 1989), created an additional FM station class (Class C3) in Zone II effective June 1, 1989. The Second Report and Order in MM Docket 88-375, 54 Fed. Reg. 35335 (August 25, 1989), increased the maximum effective radiated power (ERP) for commercial Class A stations to 6 kilowatts. Existing Class C2 facilities with an ERP of 25 kW or less and an antenna height above average terrain (HAAT) such that the distance to the 1 mV/m contour is less than or equal to 39 km will be subject to reclassification to the new Class C3 or revised Class A as appropriate. Also, certain Class C facilities with an ERP greater than 100 kW but with an antenna HAAT such that the distance to the 1 mV/m contour is less than or equal to 72 km will be subject to reclassification to Class Cl or C2 as appropriate. Affected parties have until the close of business on Monday, June 3, 1991 to apply for at least the minimum facilities for their current class as set forth in 47 C.F.R. Section 73.211 of the Rules. Stations for which applications to retain their current classifications have not been filed will be automatically reclassified, with the new class to be determined in accordance with Sections 73.210 and 73.211, effective June 4, 1991, by operation of law pursuant to the above referenced Report and Orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment
    Environment and Effects 3 Economic and Social Environment Introduction ................................................................................................ 3-477 Regional and National Economy .............................................................. 3-478 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 3-478 Regional Economic Overview ................................................................ 3-478 Natural Resource-Based Industries ....................................................... 3-481 Environmental Consequences ................................................................. 3-506 Direct and Indirect Effects ...................................................................... 3-506 Cumulative Effects ................................................................................. 3-523 Introduction The Tongass National Forest stretches roughly 500 miles northwest from Ketchikan to Yakutat and includes approximately 80 percent of the land area in Southeast Alaska. The region is sparsely settled with an estimated 74,280 people living in more than 30 towns and villages located in and around the Forest in 2014 (Alaska Department of Labor [DOL] 2014d). The communities of Southeast Alaska depend on the Tongass National Forest in various ways, including employment in the wood products, commercial fishing and fish processing, recreation, tourism, and mining and mineral development sectors. Many residents depend heavily on subsistence hunting and fishing to
    [Show full text]
  • Lobbying, Rent-Seeking, and the Constitution
    HASEN 64 STAN. L. REV. 191 (DO NOT DELETE) 1/14/2012 6:59 PM LOBBYING, RENT-SEEKING, AND THE CONSTITUTION Richard L. Hasen* Politicians across the political spectrum, from Barack Obama to Sarah Pa- lin and Rand Paul, routinely castigate lobbyists for engaging in supposedly cor- rupt activities or having unequal access to elected officials. Since attaining office President Obama has imposed unprecedented new lobbying regulations, and he is not alone: both Congress and state and local legislative bodies have done so in recent years. At the same time, federal courts, relying upon the Supreme Court’s new campaign finance decision in Citizens United v. FEC, have begun striking down lobbying regulations, including important regulations that limit campaign finance activities of lobbyists and impose a waiting period before legislators or legislative staffers may work as lobbyists. Two courts have held such laws could not be sustained on anticorruption grounds, and they are unlikely to be sustained on political equality grounds either. This Article advances an alternative rationale which could support some, though not all, of the recent wave of new lobbying regulations: the state’s interest in promoting national economic welfare. Lobbyists threaten national economic welfare in two ways. First, lobbyists facilitate rent-seeking activities. Rent- seeking occurs when individuals or groups devote resources to capturing gov- ernment transfers, rather than putting them to a productive use, and lobbyists are often the key actors securing such benefits. Second, lobbyists tend to lobby for legislation that is itself an inefficient use of government resources. Part I of this Article provides an overview of the current state of lobbying regulation and lobbying jurisprudence.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravina Access Tongass Narrows Biop AKR-2018-9806
    Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion for Construction of the Tongass Narrows Project (Gravina Access) Public Consultation Tracking System (PCTS) Number: AKR-2018-9806 Action Agencies: Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT&PF) on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration (FHA) Affected Species and Determinations: Is Action Likely Is Action Likely Is Action to Adversely To Destroy or Likely To ESA-Listed Species Status Affect Species or Adversely Jeopardize Critical Modify Critical the Species? Habitat? Habitat? Humpback whale (Megaptera Threatened Yes No N/A novaeangliae) Mexico DPS Consultation Conducted By: National Marine Fisheries Service Issued By: ____________________________________ James W. Balsiger, Ph.D. Administrator, Alaska Region Date: February 6, 2019 Ketchikan Tongass Narrows Project PCTS AKR-2018-9806 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 4 Terms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 6 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Background .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Gravina Island, Alaska
    Geology of Gravina Island, Alaska By HENRY C. BERG GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1373 A description of the stratigraphy, lithology_, general geology_, and mineral resources of a structurally complex 1 00-square-mile island near Ketchikan) Alaska UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600391 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Ofllee Washiagton, D.C. 20401 • Price $1.ti0 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction............................................................................................................ 1 Geologic summary................................................................................................. 3 Stratigraphy and lithology.................................................................................. 5 Southwest of Bostwick-Vallenar valley..................................................... 5 Undivided metamorphosed bedded and intrusive rocks.................. 5 Southern belt.................................................................................. 6 Northern belt................................................................................. 7 Altered leucocratic plutonic rocks...................................................... 8 Puppets Formation..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A – Inventory of Existing Conditions
    A – Inventory of Existing Conditions Introduction. The Ketchikan International Airport (KTN) is in southeastern Alaska on Gravina Island, approximately one mile west of Ketchikan, Alaska. The Airport provides a safe operating environment for all classes of aircraft, including small general aviation aircraft, floatplanes, corporate business jets, and commercial service passenger aircraft and is an important asset for the region and the Ketchikan Borough. The Airport's relative location within the region is illustrated in Figure A1 and Figure A2. The Airport, including its aviation-related businesses and facilities, represents a significant regional economic asset. Additionally, the Airport also provides benefits for local businesses and industries, promotes tourism, and encourages further business development and expansion throughout the surrounding area. The last significant planning process for Ketchikan International Airport was an Airport Master Plan completed in 2003. Although the 2003 Airport Master Plan Update covered many topics including: airport access, new airport facilities, an apron expansion and completion of the parallel taxiway, this Terminal Area Plan focuses specifically upon the expansion of the passenger terminal building for KTN. A.1 Terminal Area Plan Haines GLACIER BAY DENETIAH NATIONAL PARK PROVINCIAL AND PRESERVE PARK Gustavus Dease Lake Elfin Cove Juneau Hoonah Chichagof SPATSIZI Island Iskut Admiralty MT EDZIZA PLATEAU Island PROVINCIAL WILDERNESS Angoon PARK PROVINCIAL Barabof UNITED STATES Island Sitka CANADA
    [Show full text]
  • KETCHIKAN, AK (907) 220-9201 3612 Tongass Avenue Ketchikan, AK 99901 [email protected]
    OUR TOWN DISCOVER KETCHIKAN ALASKA’S MOST VIBRANT COMMUNITY Official Publication of HISTORIC KETCHIKAN America’s Newest & Best Extended Stay Hotels NIGHTLY WEEKLY BEST MONTHLY RATES T PE Y L D F R I E N KETCHIKAN, AK (907) 220-9201 3612 Tongass Avenue Ketchikan, AK 99901 [email protected] myplacehotels.com • Toll Free (855)-200-5685 • Each franchise is independently owned and operated. Historic Ketchikan Inc. is pleased to present this book to our visitors, our prospective visitors and our residents as a record of a vibrant and progressive community. POPPEN GREGG OUR TOWN DISCOVER KETCHIKAN ALASKA PUBLISHED BY CO. KETCHIKAN KAYAK WHALE VIDEO: Historic Ketchikan Inc. The town and the Alaskan wilds: WITH SUPPORT FROM We think we have some of the best of both KETCHIKAN GATEWAY BOROUGH AND CITY OF KETCHIKAN here in Ketchikan—and we have the videos to prove it. Historic Ketchikan Inc. Historic Ketchikan Inc. This publication is a community profile with general factual information and residents’ opinions. It is designed to be informative and entertaining— Board of Directors P.O. Box 23364 a tribute to the spirit of a progressive community. It is not intended to be Terry Wanzer PRESIDENT Ketchikan, Alaska 99901 a primary historical reference. Ralph Beardsworth VICE PRESIDENT www.historicketchikan.org © 2018 Historic Ketchikan Inc. All rights reserved. This publication may not Deborah Hayden SECRETARY [email protected] be reproduced in any form except with written permission. Brief passages may be excerpted in reviews. Prior editions of Our Town were published in James Alguire TREASURER 907-225-5515 1994, 1998, 2003, 2008, 2011 and 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 2181
    Exhibit 2181 Case 1:18-cv-04420-LLS Document 131 Filed 03/23/20 Page 1 of 4 Electronically Filed Docket: 19-CRB-0005-WR (2021-2025) Filing Date: 08/24/2020 10:54:36 AM EDT NAB Trial Ex. 2181.1 Exhibit 2181 Case 1:18-cv-04420-LLS Document 131 Filed 03/23/20 Page 2 of 4 NAB Trial Ex. 2181.2 Exhibit 2181 Case 1:18-cv-04420-LLS Document 131 Filed 03/23/20 Page 3 of 4 NAB Trial Ex. 2181.3 Exhibit 2181 Case 1:18-cv-04420-LLS Document 131 Filed 03/23/20 Page 4 of 4 NAB Trial Ex. 2181.4 Exhibit 2181 Case 1:18-cv-04420-LLS Document 132 Filed 03/23/20 Page 1 of 1 NAB Trial Ex. 2181.5 Exhibit 2181 Case 1:18-cv-04420-LLS Document 133 Filed 04/15/20 Page 1 of 4 ATARA MILLER Partner 55 Hudson Yards | New York, NY 10001-2163 T: 212.530.5421 [email protected] | milbank.com April 15, 2020 VIA ECF Honorable Louis L. Stanton Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: Radio Music License Comm., Inc. v. Broad. Music, Inc., 18 Civ. 4420 (LLS) Dear Judge Stanton: We write on behalf of Respondent Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”) to update the Court on the status of BMI’s efforts to implement its agreement with the Radio Music License Committee, Inc. (“RMLC”) and to request that the Court unseal the Exhibits attached to the Order (see Dkt.
    [Show full text]