DOCSLIB.ORG

Rickinghall and Botesdale Neighbourhood Plan Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rickinghall and Botesdale Neighbourhood Plan Final Report Rickinghall and Botesdale Neighbourhood Plan Landscape Appraisal Final Report February 2018 Alison Farmer Associates 29 Montague Road Cambridge CB4 1BU 01223 461444 [email protected] www.alisonfarmer.co.uk Contents 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Scope of Work ......................................................................................................... 1 1.4 The Neighbourhood Plan ......................................................................................... 2 1.5 Potential Development Sites ................................................................................... 3 1.6 Methodology and Approach ..................................................................................... 5 2: The Evolution of the Rickinghalls and Botesdale ........................................................ 7 2.1 Early Origins and Evolution ..................................................................................... 7 2.2 Surrounding Historic Landscape Patterns................................................................ 8 3: Landscape Character .................................................................................................... 9 3.1 National Character Area 83 South Norfolk and High Suffolk Claylands .................... 9 3.2 Suffolk County Landscape Character and Local Assessments .............................. 10 3.3 Special Landscape Area ........................................................................................ 16 4: Settlement Character and Conservation Area ........................................................... 17 4.1 Settlement Form .................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Conservation Area ................................................................................................. 18 5: Detailed Analysis ......................................................................................................... 19 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Extent of Setting .................................................................................................... 19 5.3 Landmarks and Key Views .................................................................................... 20 5.4 Townscape Character Areas .................................................................................. 22 5.5 Gateways .............................................................................................................. 23 6: Detailed Assessment of Peripheral Areas ............................................................... 25 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 25 6.2 Analysis Tables ...................................................................................................... 25 6.3 Development within the Wider Parish .................................................................... 34 7: Summary of Findings ................................................................................................ 35 7.1 Special Qualities to Conserve and Enhance .......................................................... 35 7.2 Changes to Avoid .................................................................................................. 36 7.3 Management and Development Guidelines ........................................................... 36 7.4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 37 Rickinghall and Botesdale Neighbourhood Plan: Landscape Appraisal Final Report February 2018 1 1: Introduction 1.1 Background 1.1.1 Alison Farmer Associates were appointed by Rickinghall and Botesdale Neighbourhood Plan Group to undertake a landscape appraisal of the Parish, in order to provide a robust evidence base to support the development of policy within the emerging Neighbourhood Plan. In particular the Neighbourhood Plan Group required land within and surrounding the main village to be assessed in detail to establish the sensitivity and capacity of these areas to accommodate housing growth. 1.1.2 Rickinghall and Botesdale Neighbourhood Plan area contains the three Parishes of Rickinghall Superior, Rickinghall Inferior and Botesdale. The area stretches from the valley of The The Swimming Ditch (a tributary stream to the River Ouse) in the north through to Allwood Green in the south. The main settlement within the Parish is Rickinghall and Botesdale which is predominately linear in form lying just north of the A143 bypass and approximately 10km from Diss. Also within the Parish are the dispersed settlements of Candle Street, Allwood Green and Botesdale Green. 1.2 Objectives 1.2.1 The key objective of this study is to provide a robust understanding of the character and qualities of the Neighbourhood Plan Area in order to make sound judgements as to the sensitivity and capacity of land surrounding the main settlement to accommodate housing development. This study also assesses the dispersed settlement patterns within the wider Neighbourhood Plan area, and provides broad guidance on accommodating development in these areas also. 1.3 Scope of Work 1.3.1 The assessment considers all the land surrounding the settlement of Rickinghall and Botesdale and also the wider landscape setting. Where relevant, reference has also been made to land beyond the Parish where there is strong inter-visibility such that the wider landscape forms a setting to the settlement, bolstering its sense of place and /or is important in outward or inward views i.e. views to the north and northeast into the Parish of Redgrave. 1.3.2 Where land has been assessed in terms of sensitivity and capacity it is from a landscape perspective only and no consideration has been given to matters such as access or land ownership. It is possible therefore that, land identified as having some capacity to accommodate development without significant adverse landscape effects, may subsequently be discounted for reasons other than landscape. Rickinghall and Botesdale Neighbourhood Plan: Landscape Appraisal Final Report February 2018 2 Botesdale and Rickinghall Neighbourhood Plan Area (Source: Mid Suffolk District Council Website) 1.4 The Neighbourhood Plan 1.4.1 Under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012, Mid Suffolk granted Neighbourhood Plan Area for Rickinghall and Botesdale on 11 May 2017. 1.4.2 The Rickinghall and Botesdale Neighbourhood Plan Working Group was subsequently established and a series of surveys have been undertaken with the local community including a Housing Needs Survey which sought views on quality Rickinghall and Botesdale Neighbourhood Plan: Landscape Appraisal Final Report February 2018 3 of life, housing and development, jobs and local economy and protection of the environment. This questionnaire revealed that the majority of respondents wished to see several small developments rather that a single large scale development and that key concerns focused on access and safety issues regarding traffic, pressure on the heath centre, environmental impact and loss of village identity. 1.5 Potential Development Sites 1.5.1 Rickinghall and Botesdale were identified as a key service centre in the emerging local plan and are therefore considered a sustainable location for residential development. The Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) carried out in May 2016 considered peripheral sites around the settlement and identified four sites which were regarded as potentially suitable for residential development namely: Site reference Location Status BOT/RIC01 Land south of Diss Subject of current outline planning Road/Park View, Botesdale application - decision awaited BOT/RIC02 Land at Rectory Hill and Small site on western edge of the The Street, Rickinghall area subject of a current planning application - decision awaited BOT/RIC03 Land north of Back Hills, No current activity Botesdale BOT/RIC05 Land at Back Hills, Subject of current outline planning Botesdale (planning application - approved with application approved) conditions 1.5.2 It also rejected three sites as unsuitable for residential development namely: Site reference Location Reason for Rejection BOT/RIC04 Botesdale Green, Common Site is poorly related to existing Road, Botesdale settlement, services and facilities BOT/RIC06 Land off Bury Road, Majority of site is in flood zone 3 Rickinghall BOT/RIC07 Land at Rectory Hill, Poor relationship to existing Rickinghall settlement, services and facilities However, small site in the northern part of the area recently granted outline planning permission 1.5.3 In August 2017 Babergh and Mid Suffolk undertook a Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (SHELAA). This study took all sites which Rickinghall and Botesdale Neighbourhood Plan: Landscape Appraisal Final Report February 2018 4 had come forward as part of their call for sites in April 2017 and assessed them against set criteria to determine which were deliverable, those with potential and those
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Saxon Newsletter-Template.Indd
    Saxon Newsletter of the Sutton Hoo Society No. 50 / January 2010 (© Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery) Hoards of Gold! The recovery of hundreds of 7th–8th century objects from a field in Staffordshire filled the newspapers when it was announced by the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) at a press conference on 24 September. Uncannily, the first piece of gold was recovered seventy years to the day after the first gold artefact was uncovered at Sutton Hoo on 21 July 1939.‘The old gods are speaking again,’ said Dr Kevin Leahy. Dr Leahy, who is national finds advisor on early medieval metalwork to the PAS and who catalogued the hoard, will be speaking to the SHS on 29 May (details, back page). Current Archaeology took the hoard to mark the who hate thee be driven from thy face’. (So even launch of their ‘new look’ when they ran ten pages this had a military flavour). of pictures in their November issue [CA 236] — “The art is like Sutton Hoo — gold with clois- which, incidentally, includes a two-page interview onée garnet and fabulous ‘Style 2’ animal interlace with our research director, Professor Martin on pommels and cheek guards — but maybe a Carver. bit later in date. This and the inscription suggest Martin tells us, “The hoard consists of 1,344 an early 8th century date overall — but this will items mainly of gold and silver, although 864 of probably move about. More than six hundred pho- these weigh less than 3g. The recognisable parts of tos of the objects can be seen on the PAS’s Flickr the hoard are dominated by military equipment — website.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk. (Kelly's
    liS ~L YTHBURGH. SUFFOLK. (KELLY'S Hunt Bobert, farmer, Hawthorn farm Piper Hetbert, miller (wind) Walker Alfred, gamekeeper to the Kett Andrew, farmer, Church farm Ward John, White Hart inn Earl of Stradbroke · Morris Thos. Harold Pryce M.R.C.S. HINTON. Eng., L.R.C.P.Lond. surgeon (at- BULCAMP. tends mon. & thurs) Bughes James, White house Gray Sarah (Mrs.) & Sons, farmers, Muttitt Charles, gamekeeper to Sir Buggs Herbt. Wm. farrqr. Lyon's frm Hinton hall Ralph Blois Flatt Brothers, farmers, Union farm Gray Arthur, farmer Parkington William Fisk, blacksmith Girling Herbert William, farmer, Piper William Geo. farmer,Hinton lo Piper Catherine (Mrs.), farmer Bulcamp farm; res. Reydon Winter Arthur W. farmer ' :BOTESDALE is a small town, with portions oi the and 35 of -water; rateable value, £x,67x; the population parishes of Rickinghall Inferior and Rickinghall Superior in xgn was 4I5· adjoining, fonning one street of nearly a mile in .length, Post, M. 0. & T. Office.-Arthur Edward Claydon, on. the road from B~ry S~. Edmunds to. No_rwich, 4~ sub-postmaster. Letters arrive from Diss & delivered miles west from ~ellis station, on the mam. lme. of _the at 7 a.m. & 2 . 30 p.m.; sundays, 7 a.m.; dispatched Great Eastern railway, 6 south-west from D1ss, m :Nor- at xo. 3o a.m. & 7.4o p.m. daily; sundays, 7.40 p.m folk, 8 west-by-north from Eye, .xs from Bury St. Ed- Wall Letter Box, Rickinghall street, cleared at xo.25 munds and 87 from London, m the North Eastern a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk
    600 MAG SUFFOLK. [KELLY'S < MACHINISTs-continued. Eastaugh Henry J. South wharf, Rope Edward, Rope's wharf, Orford. Shulver Arthur, Wellclose square, Lowestoft; &; at :Becc1es Wickham Market; & at .A.ldeburg;b Framlingham R.S.O Edwards Henry & Son, Thoroughfare Row William &; Son, Saxmundham Thurlow George & Sons, Stowmarket &; Sun wharf, Woodbridge Savage WaIter, Stradishall, Newmarkt Whitmore &; Binyon Limited (wheat Elmer Brothers,Chelmondiston, Ipswch Savill A. & Co.; offices, G. E. R. sta- cleaning), Wickham Market Ennals Wm. Robt. Cross green, Cock- tion, Eye; also at G. E. R. station. ·Woods &; Co. Suffolk iron works, field, Bury &; at Whelnetham Rail- Mellis, Eye . Stowmarket; &; at Bury; Newmar- way station Simpson Willillm, George street c\ ket; Norwich; Ipswich & Haverhill Fisher Charles J. & Co.; offices, Priory farm, Hadleigh RS.O brewery &; stores, Church st. Eye Smith W. &; A. &; Bacon Thomas, Rail- MAGNETIC APPLIANCES Fison Edward, Stoke bridge, Ipswich way station, Thurston, Bury MANUFACTURERS OF. Free, Rodwell &; Co. Limited, Wood- Smith & Eastaugh, The Staithe-. Scrivener, Gill &; Co. 4 Queen st.Ipswh bridge &; Stowupland st. Stowmarket :Beccles; &; South wharf, Lowestoft MAIL CONTRACTORS Garrett Newson & Son Limited (Geo. Squirrell William &; Son,Bildeston S.O . H. Garrett, manager), Snape bridge, Swonnell &; Sons Limited, Oulton See Contractors. Dunningworth, Tunstall, Wickham Broad, Lowestoft market Tollemaches Ipswich Brewery Limited MALT MERCHANTS. Garrett S. J. & Co. 2 East street, Sud- (H. B. Southgate, sec.). Upper :Buckmaster John, Victoria mills, bury; & Cavendish R.S.O :Brook st.; store, 26 Forest.Ipswch Framlingham R.S.O Gayford Ernest Robert, Bridge street; Turner .A.1fred,Witnesham mills,Ipswb Collen Daniel Waiter, Elmswell, Bury Market place &; Railway station, Had- Walker W.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Suffolk District Council
    APPENDIX D MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSULTATION LIST FOR LICENSING ACT 2003 & GAMBLING ACT 2005 POLICY REVISIONS 1. All existing premises/club licence holders 2. Debenham Library 3. Elmswell Library 4. Eye Library 5. Needham Market Library 6. Stowmarket Library 7. Stradbroke Library 8. Thurston Library 9. Akenham Parish Meeting 10. Ashbocking Parish Council 11. Ashfield Cum Thorpe Parish Council 12. Bacton Parish Council 13. Badley Parish Meeting 14. Badwell Ash Parish Council 15. Barham Parish Council 16. Barking Parish Council 17. Battisford Parish Council 18. Baylham Parish Meeting 19. Bedfield Parish Council 20. Bedingfield Parish Council 21. Beyton Parish Council 22. Botesdale Parish Council 23. Braiseworth Parish Meeting 24. Bramford Parish Council 25. Brome and Oakley Parish Council 26. Brundish Parish Council 27. Buxhall Parish Council 28. Claydon and Whitton Parish Council 29. Coddenham Parish Council 30. Combs Parish Council 31. Cotton Parish Council 32. Creeting St Mary Parish Council 33. Creeting St Peter Parish Council 34. Crowfield Parish Council 35. Darmsden Parish Meeting 36. Debenham Parish Council 37. Denham Parish Council 38. Drinkstone Parish Council 39. Earl Stonham Parish Council 40. Elmswell Parish Council 41. Eye Town Council 42. Felsham Parish Council 43. Finningham Parish Council 44. Flowton Parish Meeting 45. Framsden Parish Council 46. Fressingfield Parish Council 47. Gedding Parish Meeting 48. Gislingham Parish Council 49. Gosbeck Parish Council 50. Great Ashfield Parish Council 51. Great Blakenham Parish Council 52. Great Bricett Parish Council 53. Great Finborough Parish Council 54. Harleston Parish Meeting 55. Haughley Parish Council 56. Helmingham Parish Council 57. Hemingstone Parish Council 58. Henley Parish Council 59.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Mag Master
    PARISH MAGAZINE Redgrave cum Botesdale and Rickinghall Village Word Search July 2012 Find the following words in the grid above Botesdale Bridewell Church Ducks Farmers Market Fen Hairdressers Hall Inferior Kitchen Manor Mid Suffolk Mobile Library Newsagents Parish Park Farm Pond Post Office Pub Redgrave Rickinghall St Botolphs Way Stream Street Superior Takeaway Tinteniac Ulfketel Village Waveney Rev’d Chris Norburn Rector of Redgrave cum Botesdale with the Rickinghalls The Rectory, Bury Road, Rickinghall, Diss. IP22 1HA Tel: 01379 898685 St Mary’s Rickinghall Inferior now has a web site http://stmarysrickinghallinferior.onesuffolk.net/ or Google: St Mary's Rickinghall Inferior When my passions rise up inside me I often find myself compelled we often call the ‘gospels’, the to speak. For me this happens when an issue close to my heart is narratives of Jesus’ life and death, being discussed by others and I feel compelled to interject. For me were only written later for the this also happens when I feel an injustice is being, or about to be benefit of those who had already perpetrated. Compulsion to speak out can be for many different accepted the gospel! They were in reasons and can sometimes take you by surprise, so there are many no sense the basis of Christianity different patterns to our compulsions to speak out. Likewise there because they were first written for are no fixed patterns for God as he speaks to us and compels us to those who had already converted to speak for him here. Christianity. The first fact in the Rev history of Christianity is that a This means that there are many different ways of bringing people number of people (Jesus’ disciples and first followers) say that they into His Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Rickinghall | Suffolk | IP22 1EG
    ‘Woodland Wonder’ Rickinghall | Suffolk | IP22 1EG Step inside From the outside, it is hard to imagine what could be hidden away behind this three ‘There’s three acres all together and it’s nice just bedroom traditional period property, located to have a walk down there and explore and be on the main street in the thriving village of at one with nature. After a busy day at work I go Rickinghall. But walk through the garden, you will down there and just close my eyes and listen to find yourself in your own woodland oasis with the birds, it’s very visual, it sounds like running around three acres of gardens and grounds to water as the wind blows through the trees.’ The explore and enjoy. This is a home and grounds woodland is a haven for wildlife too, they that really needs to be seen to be fully frequently see muntjac and roe deer, squirrels, appreciated. woodpeckers and lots of different birds. The garden and woodland are also perfect for • Wonderful Grade II Listed Period Home entertaining with a wealth of different places to • Magnificent Wooded Grounds Extending sit and relax and you could easily have friends to To Around Three Acres (stms) stay where everybody could camp out under • Three Comfortable Bedrooms the stars. Furthermore, it is a dream garden for • First Floor and Ground Floor Bathrooms children as there is so much space to run and • Fine Sitting Room With Large Inglenook explore and so many locations that would be Fireplace perfect for a treehouse or for building dens.
    [Show full text]
  • Botesdale / Rickinghall 2011
    conservation area appraisal © Crown copyright All rights reserved Mid Suffolk D C Licence no 100017810 2009 Introduction The villages of Rickinghall Inferior, Rickinghall Superior and Botesdale were designated as a conservation area in 1973 jointly by East and West Suffolk County Councils and inherited by Mid Suffolk District Council at its inception in 1974. The Council has a duty to review its conservation area designations from time to time, and this appraisal examines Rickinghall and Botesdale under a number of different headings as set out in English Heritage’s new ‘Guidance on Conservation Area Appraisals’ (2006). As such it is a straightforward appraisal of Rickinghall and Botesdale’s built environment in conservation terms. This document is neither prescriptive nor overly descriptive, but more a demonstration of ‘quality of place’, sufficient for the briefing of the Planning Officer when assessing proposed works in the area. The photographs and maps are thus intended to contribute as much as the text itself. As the English Heritage guidelines point out, the appraisal is to be read as a general overview, rather than as a comprehensive listing, and the omission of any particular building, feature or space does not imply that it is of no interest in conservation terms. Text, photographs and map overlays by Patrick Taylor, Conservation Architect, Mid Suffolk District Council 2009. © Crown copyright All rights reserved Mid Suffolk D C Licence no 100017810 2009 Topographical Framework The villages of Rickinghall and Botesdale have become merged into a single settlement along about a mile of former main road six miles south-west of the Norfolk market town of Diss, in the northern part of Mid Suffolk District.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbott a Family History
    Abbott A Family History National and Local Events Date The Abbott Family George III 1760-1820 c 17th – 19th Several Abbott families living in centuries Needham Market in Suffolk c 1766 - 1769 Birth of Charles Abbott Captain James Cook sails on 1768 his first Pacific voyage aboard Endeavour. c 1771 Birth of Sarah, wife of Charles Abbott First patent for a water closet, 1775 the first modern toilet, granted to Alexander Cumming The markets in Needham 1776 Market revived A House of Industry (workhouse) built at Barham to serve the parish of Needham Market America declares Independence Joseph Bramah patented an 1778 improved version of the water closet The ‘First Fleet’ sails to 1788 Australia Mutiny on the Bounty 1789 French Revolution begins Edward Jenner discovers 1796 smallpox vaccine National and Local Events Date The Abbott Family Failed nationalist rebellion in 1798 Marriage of Elizabeth Ireland led by Wolfe Tone Wingfield’s parents, Robert Wingfield and Mary Everson, in Mickfield in Suffolk Income tax introduced 1799 Act of Union unites Britain 1801 and Ireland First National census taken 1802 -1807 5 children born to Charles Abbott and wife Sarah (Ann) in Needham Market, Suffolk C 1802 - 1841 Charles Abbott resident in Needham Market 1802 Birth of Elizabeth Wingfield in Mickfield to Robert and Mary Wingfield (née Everson) Britain declares war on 1803 France 1804 Birth of Robert Abbott in Needham Market Battle of Trafalgar 1805 Death in New York of 1809 Thomas Paine, author of The Rights of Man et al. Luddite riots 1811-1812 Battle
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Stock for Suffolk's Districts and Parishes 2003
    HOUSING STOCK FOR SUFFOLK’S DISTRICTS AND PARISHES 2003-2012 Prepared by Business Development 0 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 2 Section 1 – Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2 Section 2 – Data ................................................................................................................................ 3 County and District ..................................................................................................................... 3 Babergh ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Forest Heath .................................................................................................................................. 7 Ipswich (and Ipswich Policy Area) ....................................................................................... 8 Mid Suffolk ..................................................................................................................................... 9 St Edmundsbury ........................................................................................................................ 12 Suffolk Coastal ............................................................................................................................ 15 Waveney ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Electoral Review of Mid Suffolk
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF MID SUFFOLK Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of Mid Suffolk August 2018 MENDHAM Sheet 1 of 1 CP Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background WEYBREAD may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information CP applied as part of this review. METFIELD CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2018. FRESSINGFIELD PALGRAVE WORTHAM SYLEHAM CP CP REDGRAVE CP STUSTON CP CP BROME AND FRESSINGFIELD HINDERCLAY WINGFIELD OAKLEY CP CP KEY TO PARISH WARDS CP CP THRANDESTON STOWMARKET CP CP A CHILTON NORTH RICKINGHALL HOXNE B CHILTON SOUTH CP C COMBS FORD BOTESDALE D ST PETER'S NORTH CP BURGATE RICKINGHALL E ST PETER'S SOUTH CP INFERIOR CP F STOW THORNEY MELLIS CP STRADBROKE YAXLEY CP CP WATTISFIELD RICKINGHALL CP SUPERIOR CP PALGRAVE EYE DENHAM CP GISLINGHAM CP THORNHAM PARVA CP EYE STRADBROKE & LAXFIELD HORHAM CP LAXFIELD CP GISLINGHAM BRAISEWORTH WILBY CP CP CP THORNHAM WALSHAM-LE-WILLOWS MAGNA CP CP OCCOLD CP REDLINGFIELD CP ATHELINGTON WALSHAM-LE-WILLOWS CP STOKE ASH CP HOXNE & FINNINGHAM WORLINGWORTH BRUNDISH LANGHAM CP CP CP WESTHORPE CP SOUTHOLT BADWELL CP WORLINGWORTH ASH CP CP STOWLANGTOFT WICKHAM CP SKEITH CP RISHANGLES THORNDON CP
    [Show full text]
  • Precept Per Parish 2020-21
    Mid Suffolk District Council - Precept per Parish 2020-21 Parish 2019/20 Tax Council 2020/21 Tax Base Council Increase / Parish Base £ Tax Parish £ Tax Decrease Precept £ Band D £ Precept £ Band D £ (-) £ Akenham - 22.48 0.00 0.00 23.61 1,735.15 4.79% Ashbocking 1,950.00 143.70 0.11 1,950.00 139.70 1,749.11 -2.86% Ashfield-cum-Thorpe 2,926.58 96.07 1.68 2,982.19 99.57 1,765.10 3.52% Aspall - 27.81 0.00 0.00 29.24 1,735.15 4.89% Athelington 421.84 19.96 6.89 421.87 19.96 1,756.29 0.00% Bacton 22,671.38 450.84 1.43 23,724.35 461.24 1,786.59 2.25% Badley - 34.55 0.00 0.00 34.41 1,735.15 -0.41% Badwell Ash 19,500.00 313.63 13.66 22,425.00 316.07 1,806.10 0.77% Barham 27,290.00 532.03 4.51 28,108.70 531.95 1,787.99 -0.02% Barking 9,000.00 169.24 0.02 10,381.00 175.73 1,794.22 3.69% Battisford 10,725.00 246.47 -0.33 10,725.00 254.36 1,777.31 3.10% Baylham - 115.17 0.00 0.00 112.98 1,735.15 -1.94% Bedfield 3,600.00 156.55 3.97 4,100.00 159.82 1,760.80 2.05% Bedingfield 1,620.00 99.93 -0.19 1,620.00 101.34 1,751.14 1.39% Beyton 16,622.00 310.97 11.65 16,622.00 312.20 1,788.39 0.39% Botesdale 29,500.00 277.30 2.10 30,700.00 277.62 1,845.73 0.12% Braiseworth - 30.54 0.00 0.00 29.85 1,735.15 -2.31% Bramford 67,500.00 862.93 -1.58 68,850.00 871.08 1,814.19 0.94% Brome and Oakley 6,630.00 193.72 0.26 6,630.00 195.03 1,769.14 0.67% Brundish 3,860.69 74.72 1.19 3,976.51 76.84 1,786.90 2.76% Burgate 2,915.48 67.87 1.63 3,017.41 68.94 1,778.92 1.55% Buxhall 4,119.21 158.48 0.77 4,617.70 163.72 1,763.35 3.20% Claydon 39,728.44 755.95 -3.67 39,902.52 758.91
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Neighbourhood Plan
    Prepared by Great Barton Neighbourhood Plan Working Group on behalf of Great Barton Parish Council and with the assistance of CONTENTS 1 Introduction 4 2 Great Barton - History and Now 9 3 Planning Policy Context 18 4 Vision and Objectives 22 5 Planning Strategy 24 6 Housing 27 7 Business and Employment 43 8 Community Facilities 45 9 Built Character and Environment 47 10 Transport and Travel 62 11 Monitoring and Delivery 68 Appendix 1 - Statutory Listed Buildings 72 Appendix 2 - 2010 Parish Plan Actions Update 73 Appendix 3 - Government National Space Standards for New Housing 75 Appendix 4 - Development Design Checklist 76 Glossary 78 POLICIES Policy GB 1 - Spatial Strategy 25 Policy GB 2 - Housing Delivery 29 Policy GB 3 - Land at School Road (The Triangle) 37 Policy GB 4 - Housing Mix 40 Policy GB 5 - Housing Design 42 Policy GB 6 - Retention of existing Employment Premises 44 Policy GB 7 - Community Facilities 46 Policy GB 8 - Sport and Recreation Facilities 46 Policy GB 9 - Local Green Spaces 51 Policy GB 10 - The Park Special Character Area 55 Policy GB 11 - Hall Park Special Character Area 56 Policy GB 12 - Development Design Considerations 59 Policy GB 13 - Sustainable Construction Practices 60 Policy GB 14 - Buildings of Local Significance 61 Policy GB 15 - Public Rights of Way 67 Policies Map 69 3 1 Introduction 1.1 A Neighbourhood Development Plan (usually known as a Neighbourhood Plan) is a community-led planning framework for guiding future development, regeneration and conservation of a designated area. It contains planning policies along with proposals for improving that area.
    [Show full text]