DOCSLIB.ORG

Withdrawal Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Withdrawal Agreement 12.11.2019 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union C 384 I/1 II (Information) INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES COUNCIL AGREEMENT on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (2019/C 384 I/01) PREAMBLE THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, CONSIDERING that on 29 March 2017 the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ("United Kingdom"), following the outcome of a referendum held in the United Kingdom and its sovereign decision to leave the European Union, notified its intention to withdraw from the European Union ("Union") and the European Atomic Energy Community ("Euratom") in accordance with Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union ("TEU"), which applies to Euratom by virtue of Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community ("Euratom Treaty"), WISHING to set out the arrangements for the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union and Euratom, taking account of the framework for their future relationship, NOTING the guidelines of 29 April and 15 December 2017 and of 23 March 2018 provided by the European Council in the light of which the Union is to conclude the Agreement setting out the arrangements for the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union and Euratom, RECALLING that, pursuant to Article 50 TEU, in conjunction with Article 106a of the Euratom Treaty, and subject to the arrangements laid down in this Agreement, the law of the Union and of Euratom in its entirety ceases to apply to the United Kingdom from the date of entry into force of this Agreement, STRESSING that the objective of this Agreement is to ensure an orderly withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union and Euratom, RECOGNISING that it is necessary to provide reciprocal protection for Union citizens and for United Kingdom nationals, as well as their respective family members, where they have exercised free movement rights before a date set in this Agreement, and to ensure that their rights under this Agreement are enforceable and based on the principle of non- discrimination; recognising also that rights deriving from periods of social security insurance should be protected, C 384 I/2 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 12.11.2019 RESOLVED to ensure an orderly withdrawal through various separation provisions aiming to prevent disruption and to provide legal certainty to citizens and economic operators as well as to judicial and administrative authorities in the Union and in the United Kingdom, while not excluding the possibility of relevant separation provisions being superseded by the agreement(s) on the future relationship, CONSIDERING that it is in the interest of both the Union and the United Kingdom to determine a transition or implementation period during which – notwithstanding all consequences of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the Union as regards the United Kingdom's participation in the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, in particular the end, on the date of entry into force of this Agreement, of the mandates of all members of institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union nominated, appointed or elected in relation to the United Kingdom's membership of the Union – Union law, including international agreements, should be applicable to and in the United Kingdom, and, as a general rule, with the same effect as regards the Member States, in order to avoid disruption in the period during which the agreement (s) on the future relationship will be negotiated, RECOGNISING that, even if Union law will be applicable to and in the United Kingdom during the transition period, the specificities of the United Kingdom as a State having withdrawn from the Union mean that it will be important for the United Kingdom to be able to take steps to prepare and establish new international arrangements of its own, including in areas of Union exclusive competence, provided such agreements do not enter into force or apply during that period, unless so authorised by the Union, RECALLING that the Union and the United Kingdom have agreed to honour the mutual commitments undertaken while the United Kingdom was a member of the Union through a single financial settlement, CONSIDERING that in order to guarantee the correct interpretation and application of this Agreement and compliance with the obligations under this Agreement, it is essential to establish provisions ensuring overall governance, in particular binding dispute-settlement and enforcement rules that fully respect the autonomy of the respective legal orders of the Union and of the United Kingdom as well as the United Kingdom's status as a third country, ACKNOWLEDGING that, for an orderly withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, it is also necessary to establish, in separate protocols to this Agreement, durable arrangements addressing the very specific situations relating to Ireland/ Northern Ireland and to the Sovereign Base Areas in Cyprus, ACKNOWLEDGING further that, for an orderly withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, it is also necessary to establish, in a separate protocol to this Agreement, the specific arrangements in respect of Gibraltar applicable in particular during the transition period, UNDERLINING that this Agreement is founded on an overall balance of benefits, rights and obligations for the Union and the United Kingdom, NOTING that in parallel with this Agreement, the Parties have made a Political Declaration setting out the framework for the future relationship between the European Union and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, CONSIDERING that there is a need for both the United Kingdom and the Union to take all necessary steps to begin as soon as possible from the date of entry into force of this Agreement, the formal negotiations of one or several agreements governing their future relationship with a view to ensuring that, to the extent possible, those agreements apply from the end of the transition period, 12.11.2019 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union C 384 I/3 HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: PART ONE COMMON PROVISIONS Article 1 Objective This Agreement sets out the arrangements for the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ("United Kingdom") from the European Union ("Union") and from the European Atomic Energy Community ("Euratom"). Article 2 Definitions For the purposes of this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply: (a) "Union law" means: (i) the Treaty on European Union ("TEU"), the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community ("Euratom Treaty"), as amended or supplemented, as well as the Treaties of Accession and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, together referred to as "the Treaties"; (ii) the general principles of the Union's law; (iii) the acts adopted by the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union; (iv) the international agreements to which the Union is party and the international agreements concluded by the Member States acting on behalf of the Union; (v) the agreements between Member States entered into in their capacity as Member States of the Union; (vi) acts of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the European Council or the Council of the European Union ("Council"); (vii) the declarations made in the context of intergovernmental conferences which adopted the Treaties; (b) "Member States" means the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Croatia, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden; (c) "Union citizen" means any person holding the nationality of a Member State; (d) "United Kingdom national" means a national of the United Kingdom, as defined in the New Declaration by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of 31 December 1982 on the definition of the term "nationals" (1) together with Declaration No 63 annexed to the Final Act of the intergovernmental conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon (2); (1) OJ C 23, 28.1.1983, p. 1. (2) OJ C 306, 17.12.2007, p. 270. C 384 I/4 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 12.11.2019 (e) "transition period" means the period provided in Article 126; (f) "day" means a calendar day, unless otherwise provided in this Agreement or in provisions of Union law made applicable by this Agreement. Article 3 Territorial scope 1. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement or in Union law made applicable by this Agreement, any reference in this Agreement to the United Kingdom or its territory shall be understood as referring to: (a) the United Kingdom; (b) Gibraltar, to the extent that Union law was applicable to it before the date of entry into force of this Agreement; (c) the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, to the extent that Union
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament
    3 . 12 . 93 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 327/1 I (Information) EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWER WRITTEN QUESTION No 1649/91 4 . Is any action due to be taken on Parliament's resolution by the following members : Paul Lannoye, Solange Fernex, of 16 March 1989, paragraphs 43 and 44 of which are Claudia Roth, Herman Verbeek, Virginio Bettini, aimed at imposing strict controls on the possible Eva-Maria Quistorp, Didier Anger and military applications of genetic engineering ? Gianfranco Amendola ( V ) 5 . What action does the Commission intend to take to to the Commission of the, European Communities monitor and, where necessary, restrict or ban the use (25 July 1991 ) within the territory of the Community of products and ( 93/C 327/01 technology which could be used for military purposes ? (!) OJ No L 50, 22 . 2 . 1989 , p. 1 . Subject: Initiatives by the Commission to restrict arms proliferation The events in the Middle East have once again highlighted Answer given by Mr Van den Broek the problem of the proliferation of nuclear , chemical and on behalf of the Commission bacteriological weapons . Iraq is not an isolated case , and (22 September 1993) international treaties and conventions have so far failed to curb generalized proliferation which constitutes a major threat to international security. With reference to the November 1991 answer to question No 1650/91 in the context of European Political Cooperation, the Commission can now provide Several European States bear considerable responsibility in Honourable Members with further information on this area, which is a reason why the Community should take developments relating to nuclear and chemical weapons effective action without delay, pending revision of such non-proliferation measures .
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL REGULATION (EURATOM) No 237 / 2014
    15.3.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 77/109 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COUNCIL REGULATION (EURATOM) No 237/2014 of 13 December 2013 establishing an Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Community should be able to support nuclear safety in third countries. Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 203 thereof, (4) By acting within common policies and strategies with its Member States, the Union alone has the critical mass to respond to global challenges and is also best placed to Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, coordinate cooperation with third countries. Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1), (5) By Commission Decision 1999/819/Euratom (3), the Community acceded to the 1994 Convention on Nuclear Safety. By Commission Decision 2005/510/Euratom (4), Whereas: the Community also acceded to the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. (1) The Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation, estab­ lished by Council Regulation (Euratom) No 300/2007 (2), constitutes one of the instruments providing direct (6) In order to maintain and promote the continuous support for the external policies of the European Union improvement of nuclear safety and its regulation, the and the European Atomic Energy Community. Council adopted Directive 2009/71/Euratom (5) and Directive 2011/70/Euratom (6). These Directives and the high standards of nuclear safety and of radioactive waste and spent fuel management implemented in the Com­ (2) The Union is a major provider of economic, financial, munity are examples to be used in order to encourage technical, humanitarian and macroeconomic assistance to third countries to adopt similar high standards.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of International Police Cooperation Within the EU
    American University International Law Review Volume 14 | Issue 3 Article 1 1999 The evelopmeD nt of International Police Cooperation within the EU and Between the EU and Third Party States: A Discussion of the Legal Bases of Such Cooperation and the Problems and Promises Resulting Thereof Jacqueline Klosek Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Klosek, Jacqueline. "The eD velopment of International Police Cooperation within the EU and Between the EU and Third Party States: A Discussion of the Legal Bases of Such Cooperation and the Problems and Promises Resulting Thereof." American University International Law Review 14, no. 3 (1999): 599-656. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL POLICE COOPERATION WITHIN THE EU AND BETWEEN THE EU AND THIRD PARTY STATES: A DISCUSSION OF THE LEGAL BASES OF SUCH COOPERATION AND THE PROBLEMS AND PROMISES RESULTING THEREOF JACQUELINE KLOSEK* INTRODUCTION .............................................. 600 I. TRADITIONAL BILATERAL, REGIONAL, AND MULTILATERAL BASES OF TRANSNATIONAL POLICE COOPERATION ................................... 603 A. THE UNITED STATES ....................................... 603 B. THE M IDDLE EAST ........................................ 606 C. CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE ........................... 609 D. INTERNATIONAL AND MULTILATERAL EFFORTS ............ 610 II. EUROPEAN EFFORTS AT TRANSNATIONAL POLICE COOPERATION ............................................ 611 A . T REvI ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives for Reform in the European Union Nicolai Von Ondarza
    Introduction Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Comments Blocked for Good by the Threat of Treaty Change? WP S Perspectives for Reform in the European Union Nicolai von Ondarza The European Union faces a fundamental dilemma. On the one hand, pressure to reform its structures is growing. The hard negotiations with Greece in summer 2015 have revived the debate on deepening the Eurozone, while at the same time London is pushing to roll back integration, at least for itself. On the other hand, national governments reject any moves that would require a treaty change (such as transfer of powers) as politically impossible. Legal options for evading the dilemma and developing the Union by “covert integration” do exist, but these require unanimous political agreement among all the national governments – and would in the medium term require treaty changes to restore transparency and democratic legitimacy. The traumatic process of negotiating and bought itself some time for reform, the vola- ratifying the EU Constitutional Treaty and tile negotiations with Greece in summer the Treaty of Lisbon has left deep marks. 2015 again spotlighted the persistence of Ever since, national governments have con- grave deficits in its economic and political sistently avoided initiating significant treaty structures. In response, France in summer amendments, including at the height of 2015 proposed strengthening the Eurozone the euro crisis. Even in projects such as the with a finance minister with a budget and banking union, they have instead turned a parliament of its own. Concurrently, in to treaties outside the EU framework. June 2015 the presidents of five European Despite this reservation – or perhaps institutions (Commission, Council, ECB, precisely because of it – pressure to tackle Eurogroup and European Parliament) pub- reform of primary law is growing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brexit Effect on Guernsey Immigration
    Global Legal and Professional Services Comings and Goings: The Brexit Effect on 17 January 2019 Guernsey Immigration In December 2018, the UK Government published its white paper on the skills-based immigration system which it plans to introduce post- Brexit. There will be a 12 month consultation period before proposals are finalised, but, as things currently stand, how might the proposed changes to the UK's system affect Guernsey employers and the Island's estimated 4,200 EU workers. » Following the UK's agreement with the EU in June 2018 on citizens' rights, the UK announced its settlement scheme. This scheme secures the residency rights of EU citizens who are lawfully resident in the UK as at 31 December 2020. Guernsey has committed to a similar scheme (subject to ratification by the States) under which EU citizens resident in Guernsey as at 31 December 2020 will be entitled to apply for leave to remain in the Bailiwick (this assumes that date won't change in the event of a no deal Brexit). Any EU citizen with more than 5 years' residence will be entitled to apply for indefinite leave to remain. Those with under 5 years' residence will be able to apply for limited leave to remain and then to apply for indefinite leave on reaching 5 years' residence. » Guernsey's immigration officials expect to work more closely in future with their counterparts in the Population Management Office to ensure that any EU citizen coming to live and work in Guernsey has not only the required employment permit under the Population Management regime, but also the necessary work permit under the amended immigration system.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Contact Tracing Guidance (Including Complex Settings) Health Protection Team Guidance Version 3.5 Publication Date: 29 April 2021
    COVID-19 Contact Tracing Guidance (including complex settings) Health Protection Team Guidance Version 3.5 Publication date: 29 April 2021 This document is uncontrolled when printed. Before use check the COVID-19 page to verify this is the current version. Version history An archive of all previously published versions of this guidance and supporting resources that relate to COVID-19 is available on the PHS website. This includes resources that have been retired from the website because they have been superseded or are no longer required. Version Date Summary of changes V3.3 19/12/2020 Section 1: Introduction updated to include lateral flow devices and vaccines Section 4: Contact tracing updated to include lateral flow devices, testing of asymptomatic people in the community, participants in surveillance studies Section 6.1: Section on self-isolation period added, with details on change to 10 days for contacts and returning travellers Section 6.2: additional settings added, including care at home, early years and childcare settings. A section has been added for healthcare workers who test positive for COVID-19 whilst on duty during their infectious period Section 6.3: Link to SG COVID-19 protection levels added Section 7: initial follow up for cases updated with information for asymptomatic cases who have had LFD testing Section 8: self-isolation period updated from 14 to 10 days for contacts and returning travellers Section 11: PHS email address updated Section 12: Link to infection control addendum added Section 14: Confidentiality section updated about information that must be shared with contacts Appendices: Self-isolation period updated from 14 to 10 days for contacts and returning travellers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of European Integration
    FACT SHEETS ON THE EUROPEAN UNION The historical development of European integration PE 618.969 1. The First Treaties.....................................................................................................3 2. Developments up to the Single European Act.........................................................6 3. The Maastricht and Amsterdam Treaties...............................................................10 4. The Treaty of Nice and the Convention on the Future of Europe..........................14 5. The Treaty of Lisbon..............................................................................................18 EN - 18/06/2018 ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This leaflet contains a compilation of Fact Sheets provided by Parliament’s Policy Departments and Economic Governance Support Unit on the relevant policy area. The Fact Sheets are updated regularly and published on the website of the European Parliament: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets ABOUT THE PUBLISHER Author of the publication: European Parliament Department responsible: Unit for Coordination of Editorial and Communication Activities E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in June, 2018 © European Union, 2018 DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice
    [Show full text]
  • Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom of 22 October 2013 – Laying Down Requirements
    L 296/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.11.2013 DIRECTIVES COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2013/51/EURATOM of 22 October 2013 laying down requirements for the protection of the health of the general public with regard to radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, standards which have an indicator function and to provide for the monitoring of compliance with those standards. Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Articles 31 and 32 thereof, (3) Council Directive 98/83/EC ( 3) sets out indicator parameters relating to radioactive substances in Annex I, Part C and related monitoring provisions in Annex II thereto. However, those parameters fall within the scope Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission of the basic standards defined in Article 30 of the drawn up after obtaining the opinion of a group of persons Euratom Treaty. appointed by the Scientific and Technical Committee from among scientific experts in the Member States, in accordance with Article 31 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, (4) The requirements for monitoring levels of radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption should therefore be adopted in specific legislation that Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and ensures the uniformity, coherence and completeness of radiation protection legislation under the Euratom Treaty. Social Committee ( 1 ), After consulting the European Parliament, (5) Since the Community is competent to adopt the basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiations, the provisions of this Whereas: Directive supersede those of Directive 98/83/EC as regards the requirements for the protection of the health of the general public with regard to radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal and Constitutional Nature of the New International Treaties on Economic and Monetary Union from the Perspective of Eu Law
    P-с \<L Ka ¿^ ļ/s ^ ^—T> . _ _Λί_- ΛνΛ.1^-^<Λ-\,?_--^/V" p/ Jk*, Focus THE LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL NATURE OF THE NEW INTERNATIONAL TREATIES ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF EU LAW Rose M. D'Sa LL.B. (Hons), Ph.D (University of Birmingham, UK) Barrister at Law (MiddleTemple, non-practising) Consultant in European Union Law Member, European Economic and Social Committee (EESC, Brussels) Introduction This article1 discusses, in particular, two proposed Treaties of an "inter-goverrimental" nature (i.e. Treaties governed by International Law rather than European Union Law). The first is the Treaty on Stability, Co-ordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union (hereinafter referred to as the "TSCG") and the second, theTreaty on the European Stability Mechanism ("TESM"or ESM Treaty). The analysis focuses inter alia on the issue of whether the creation of these instruments is, of itself, legal and constitutional within the framework of the EU Treaties, their future relationship with the existing EU legal framework and whether their objectives could or should, as a matter of law, have been achieved within the framework of the latter. It takes account of the texts of relevant legal instruments as they stood on February 2, 2012, though some limited reference to later events has been possible. In particular, the TSCG was formally signed on March 2, 2012. The most recent alterations to its text include a new focus on growth, but otherwise appear minor. European politics in recent years and months has become increasingly focused on the economic, financial and sovereign debt crisis, created in part by the situation in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking the Potential of the EU Treaties: an Article
    Unlocking the potential of the EU Treaties An article-by-article analysis of the scope for action STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Étienne Bassot Members’ Research Service PE 630.353 – January 2019 EN Unlocking the potential of the EU Treaties An article-by-article analysis of the scope for action Public opinion often expresses the view that the European Union should do more to improve the lives of citizens in various policy areas, but a lack of convergence among Member States on the desired changes, not to mention likely hurdles in the ratification process, as well as other factors make any significant reform of the EU Treaties unlikely in the near term. This study identifies and analyses 34 policy areas where there may be the potential to do more under the existing legal bases provided by the Treaties without recourse to any amendment or updating of those texts. It looks at currently unused or under-used legal bases in the Treaties with a view to their contributing more effectively to the EU policy process. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHOR(S) This paper has been drawn up by the Members’ Research Service of the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. Its preparation has been coordinated by Rafał Mańko. A number of policy analysts within the Members' Research Service have each drafted sections of this paper. They are: Nikolai Atanassov, Denise Chircop, Carmen-Cristina Cîrlig, Alessandro D’Alfonso, María Diaz Crego, Roderick Harte, Beatrix Immenkamp, Cemal Karakas, Ivana Katsarova, Silvia Kotanidis, Tania Laţici, Elena Lazarou, Tambiama Madiega, Rafał Mańko, Nóra Milotay, Shara Monteleone, Laura Puccio, Anja Radjenović, Gianluca Sgueo, François Théron, Sofija Voronova, Agnieszka Widuto, and Alex Benjamin Wilson.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Quarantine and the Common Travel Area (CTA)
    Passenger quarantine and the Common Travel Area (CTA): The Health Protection (Coronavirus, International Travel) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2020 CAJ Briefing Note No 2, June 2020 Summary of Key issues: A 14-day self-isolation period for incoming international passengers has been under discussion in both the UK and Ireland for some time. The Irish government initiated a system on 24 April 2020. The UK Government confirmed its intention in early May to do so, with English regulations coming into force on Monday 8 June 2020; Prior public scrutiny: Despite this lead in period, the equivalent Northern Ireland (NI) Travel Regulations were made on Friday 5 June 2020 and came into force on Monday 8 June 2020 without opportunity for public scrutiny that could have highlighted deficiencies before commencement; NI returnees over the land border: There is a particular problem for NI-residents landing in Dublin airport and returning home by land to NI. Rather than there being a reciprocal arrangement in place that allows travellers to complete the Irish government’s passenger locator form, the regulations instead oblige the equivalent UK form to be completed and provided ‘on arrival’ in NI. Whilst the form can be completed online, incoming passengers into Dublin may be unaware of it, and there is no one to provide it to ‘on arrival’ over the land border in NI, yet not completing it constitutes a criminal offence (subject to a reasonable excuse defence); Transit passengers and the Donegal question: The NI regulations appear to oblige a passenger landing, for example, in Dublin Airport and returning over land to Donegal to complete the UK form and self-isolate in NI on crossing the land border; Dublin loophole: The NI/English regulations close off what had been termed in the UK press the ‘Dublin loophole’ whereby UK resident incoming passengers could evade UK self-isolation rules by travelling home via Dublin airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Rasa Engstedt, Euratom: the Treaty and the Competences of the Commmunity (University of Eastern Finland 2020)
    RASA ENGSTEDT, EURATOM: THE TREATY AND THE COMPETENCES OF THE COMMMUNITY (UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND 2020) Jakub Handrlica* After decades of disinterest, the legal issues arising with respect to the existence of the European Atomic Energy Community (thereinafter 'Euratom' or 'Euratom Community') have begun again to trigger academic interest. In 2016, Ilina Cenevska published her study, The European Atomic Energy Community in the European Union Context: The 'Outsider' Within.1 Two years later, Anna Södersten published Euratom at the Crossroads.2 Both works were well received in academic circles.3 Now, in 2020, Rasa Engstedt has completed a new monograph, Euratom: The Treaty and the Competences of the Community.4 These publications show a renewed academic interest in the Euratom Community, which in the 1960s was already referred to as 'forgotten'.5 Indeed, the previous comprehensive monograph on Euratom was published by Jaroslav G. Polach in 1964.6 After Polach's study, Euratom has only occasionally been the subject of academic attention, with authors dealing exclusively with specific issues, such as security of supply, non- proliferation and safeguards, nuclear safety, reform attempts, etc.7 Thus, the * Associate Professor of Administrative Law, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, Czech Republic. Email: [email protected]. 1 Ilina Cenevska, The European Atomic Energy Community in the European Union Context: The 'Outsider' Within (Brill Nijhoff 2016). 2 Anna Södersten, Euratom at the Crossroads (Edward Elgar 2018). 3 See Athanase Popov, 'Ilina Cenevska: The European Atomic Energy Community in the European Union Context: The 'Outsider' Within' (2019) 56 Common Market Law Review 296, Jakub Handrlica, 'Anna Södersten: Euratom at the Crossroads' (2019) 11 European Journal of Legal Studies 143.
    [Show full text]