Transportation to Duquesne University
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Oral History Program
YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY ORAL HISTORY PROGRAM Canfield Fair History Project Canfield Fair Concessionaire 0. H. 219 Arthur S. Frank Interviewed by Carrie Stanton on November 3, 1983 ARTHUR S. FRANK Arthur Prank was born in Youngstown, Ohio, the son of an insurance salesman. He attended Youngstown College for two years and got his degree from Kent State University. He taught in various public school systems for a few years and then took a full time job with the Isaly Company, in charge of the accounting department. In 1969 Mr. Prank bought the Isaly stand at the Canfield Fair and he and his family have been running it since then, Prior to 1969, he worked at the concession for the Isaly Company. If he runs the stand at the fair in 1984, it will make his forty-ninth year. Carrie Stanton YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY ORAL HISTORY PROGRAM Canfield Fair History Project INTERVIEWEE: ARTHUR FRANK INTERVIEWER: Carrie Stanton SUBJECT: Canfield Pair, Isaly Dairy Company, Concessionaire, Schools during the Depression, Teaching School DATE : November 3, 1983 S: This is an Interview with Arthur Frank for the Youngstown State University, Canfield Fair Project by Carrie Stanton at 135 Erskine Avenue, on Novem- ber 3, 1983 at approximately 10:00 a.m. First of all, let's just start with your background, your personal background, your education, your family. F- Well, Iwas born in Youngstown, Ohio. My dad, his name was Jerome Frank, was an Insurance salesman for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. My mother was Lillian. Her maiden name was Smith. She was born here, but her parents came over from England and her father had worked in the coal mines. -
BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States
BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States By: Andrew Degerstrom September 2018 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................1 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................1 Economic Development and Transit-Oriented Development ...................2 Definition of Bus Rapid Transit .................................................................2 Literature Review ..................................................................................3 BRT Economic Development Outcomes ...................................................3 Factors that Affect the Success of BRTOD Implementation .....................5 Case Studies ...........................................................................................7 Cleveland HealthLine ................................................................................7 Pittsburgh Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway East Liberty Station ..... 11 Pittsburgh Uptown-Oakland BRT and the EcoInnovation District .......... 16 BRTOD at home, the rapid bus A Line and the METRO Gold Line .........20 Conclusion .............................................................................................23 References .............................................................................................24 Artist rendering of Pittsburgh's East Liberty neighborhood and the Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway Introduction Purpose of this Report If Light Rail Transit (LRT) -
Llght Rall Translt Statlon Deslgn Guldellnes
PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT V.4.0 7/20/18 STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) provides public transportation throughout Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. The Authority’s 2,600 employees operate, maintain, and support bus, light rail, incline, and paratransit services for approximately 200,000 daily riders. Port Authority is currently focused on enacting several improvements to make service more efficient and easier to use. Numerous projects are either underway or in the planning stages, including implementation of smart card technology, real-time vehicle tracking, and on-street bus rapid transit. Port Authority is governed by an 11-member Board of Directors – unpaid volunteers who are appointed by the Allegheny County Executive, leaders from both parties in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate, and the Governor of Pennsylvania. The Board holds monthly public meetings. Port Authority’s budget is funded by fare and advertising revenue, along with money from county, state, and federal sources. The Authority’s finances and operations are audited on a regular basis, both internally and by external agencies. Port Authority began serving the community in March 1964. The Authority was created in 1959 when the Pennsylvania Legislature authorized the consolidation of 33 private transit carriers, many of which were failing financially. The consolidation included the Pittsburgh Railways Company, along with 32 independent bus and inclined plane companies. By combining fare structures and centralizing operations, Port Authority established the first unified transit system in Allegheny County. Participants Port Authority of Allegheny County would like to thank agency partners for supporting the Light Rail Transportation Station Guidelines, as well as those who participated by dedicating their time and expertise. -
Guiding Change in the Strip
Guiding Change in the Strip Capstone Seminar in Economic Development, Policy and Planning Graduate School of Public and International Affairs (GSPIA) University of Pittsburgh December 2002 GUIDING CHANGE IN THE STRIP University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public and International Affairs Capstone Seminar Fall 2002 Contributing Authors: Trey Barbour Sherri Barrier Carter Bova Michael Carrigan Renee Cox Jeremy Fine Lindsay Green Jessica Hatherill Kelly Hoffman Starry Kennedy Deb Langer Beth McCall Beth McDowell Jamie Van Epps Instructor: Professor Sabina Deitrick i ii MAJOR FINDINGS This report highlights the ongoing nature of the economic, social and environmental issues in the Strip District and presents specific recommendations for Neighbors in the Strip (NITS) and policy makers to alleviate problems hindering community development. By offering a multitude of options for decision-makers, the report can serve as a tool for guiding change in the Strip District. Following is a summary of the major findings presented in Guiding Change in the Strip: • The Strip has a small residential population. As of 2000, the population was on 266 residents. Of these residents, there is a significant income gap: There are no residents earning between $25,000 and $35,000 annually. In other words, there are a limited amount of middle-income residents. Furthermore, nearly three-quarters of the 58 families living in the Strip earned less than $25,000 in 1999. These figures represent a segment of the residential population with limited voice in the development of the Strip. There is an opportunity for NITS, in collaboration with the City of Pittsburgh, to increase the presence of these residents in the future of the Strip. -
Pittsburgh Vacant Lot T O O L K
PITTSBURGH VACANT LOT TOOLKIT Resource Guide VLTk December 2015 ABOUT THE toolkit The Vacant Lot Toolkit is a comprehensive overview of the goals, policies, processes, procedures, and guidelines for transforming vacant, blighted lots into temporary edible, flower, and rain gardens. Residents of the City of Pittsburgh can refer to this toolkit when thinking about creating a vacant lot project on City-owned land, and will find it useful throughout the process. The toolkit can also be a resource for projects on other public and privately owned land throughout the city. The City of Pittsburgh thanks you for your time, creativity, and stewardship to creating transformative projects in your ACKNOWLEDGMENTS neighborhoods. We look forward collaborating with you and VLTK Project Manager watching your projects grow. Josh Lippert, ASLA, Senior Environmental Planner Andrew Dash, AICP, Assistant Director For questions please refer to the Vacant Lot Toolkit Website: VLTK Program COORDINATOR www.pittsburghpa.gov/dcp/adoptalot Shelly Danko+Day, Open Space Specialist VLTK ADVISORY COMMITTEE City of Pittsburgh - Department of City Planning Raymond W. Gastil, AICP, Director **Please note that this toolkit is for new projects as well as City of Pittsburgh - Office of the Mayor existing projects that do not possess a current license, lease, Alex Pazuchanics right-of-entry, or waiver for City-owned property. Projects that exist without these will have to contact the Open Space Specialist City of Pittsburgh - Office of Sustainability and/or begin through the -
Detours Dated May 11, 2018
E V A Primary Detour H T IF to 2nd Ave via F E Armstrong Tunnel V A ¯ S E B R At Point of Closure (EB): O F 6 Detour to E Carson Street t h via Birmingham Bridge A V FIFTH AVE E Forbes Ave Closed T between Birmingham S T Bridge and Craft Ave N FOR A BES AVE R G C R A A R F M T S A T T V U R E N O N IES N ALL E THE G . OF L BLVD 885 BLVD. OF THE A LL )" IE S 2nd AVE ¨¦§376 )"885 M 2 Y A nd H T E A 1 V T R B G E G E S E 0 R N G t D I B h I I D I I D M R L S R G R B T At Point of Closure (NB): B I E B Detour to Fifth Avenue S E via Birmingham Bridge T A B Primary Detour to ¨¦§376 Hot Metal Bridge via E Carson St E C ARSON ST L TA E M 837 T E O G )" H D I BR DETOUR A: ROUTE SUMMARY 2 n d A CLOSED: T V S E h t Forbes Avenue between Birmingham Bridge Ramps and Craft Avenue 8 1 DETOUR FROM DOWNTOWN: E C A R S From Grant Street and Downtown area, detour in advance of Forbes O N S Avenue closure by using Armstrong Tunnel to 2nd Avenue; then to T Bates Street, to Boulevard of the Allies, to Craft Avenue. -
Joint International Light Rail Conference
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C145 July 2010 Joint International Light Rail Conference Growth and Renewal April 19–21, 2009 Los Angeles, California Cosponsored by Transportation Research Board American Public Transportation Association TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington Vice Chair: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010–2011 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Associate Administrator and Director, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Jeannie G. Beckett, Director of Operations, Port of Tacoma, Washington, Marine Group Chair Cindy J. Burbank, National Planning and Environment Practice Leader, PB, Washington, D.C., Policy and Organization Group Chair Ronald R. Knipling, Principal, safetyforthelonghaul.com, Arlington, Virginia, System Users Group Chair Edward V. A. Kussy, Partner, Nossaman, LLP, Washington, D.C., Legal Resources Group Chair Peter B. Mandle, Director, Jacobs Consultancy, Inc., Burlingame, California, Aviation Group Chair Mary Lou Ralls, Principal, Ralls Newman, LLC, Austin, Texas, Design and Construction Group Chair Daniel L. Roth, Managing Director, Ernst & Young Orenda Corporate Finance, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Rail Group Chair Steven Silkunas, Director of Business Development, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Public Transportation Group Chair Peter F. Swan, Assistant Professor of Logistics and Operations Management, Pennsylvania State, Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, Freight Systems Group Chair Katherine F. -
Let Them Eat Carrots: Expanding Produce Access in the Greater Pittsburgh Area
Let Them Eat Carrots: Expanding Produce Access in the Greater Pittsburgh Area By Cody Fischer, Bill Emerson National Hunger Fellow The Farm Stand Project, A Program of Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank 1 N Linden Street Duquesne, PA 15110 Phone: 412.460.3663 January 2008 Table of Contents Table of Contents................................................................................................................ 0 I. Benchmarks: How are we doing now? ....................................................................... 1 A. Purpose.................................................................................................................... 1 B. Farm Stand Project Structure.................................................................................. 1 C. Categories of Performance...................................................................................... 1 D. Definitions and Method .......................................................................................... 2 E. Food Bank to Farm Stand Project Comparison ...................................................... 2 Appendix A, Figure 2, Stand Performance Measures, 2006-07........................ 3 F. Soft Benefits............................................................................................................ 4 G. Individual Stand Assessment .................................................................................. 4 Appendix A, Figure 3.3........................................................................................ -
Hill District Community Plan
Susan E. Stoker and Cecilia Robert TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND MAPS .............................................................................................. iii TABLE OF APPENDICES .................. ;......................................................................................................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. vi DOCUMENT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... viii THE HILL DISTRICT AREA: ........................................................................................................................... viii DEMOGRAPHICS: ............................................................................................................. ............. viii RESIDENTIAL DEVEWPMENT: ........................................................................................................................ ix COMMERCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: ........................................ .. ............................... , .... ix SOCIAL AND BASIC SERVICES: .................................. .. ....................................... x URBAN DESIGN AND NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION: ...................... .. ................................... Xl ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................ xii -
428 Boulevard of the Allies.Indd
For Sale or Lease 428 Boulevard of the Allies Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Available Premises • 7,928 SF Available for Lease - Contiguous Total Building; 19,240 SF Lease Price • $15.00/SF Full Service Sale Price • REDUCED - $900,000.00 Parcel ID • 0002-J-00175-0000-00 Features • Space off ers a mix of exposed brick walls, wood beams and glass block walls. • Includes kitchen and restrooms on each fl oor. • Integral staircase connects the fi rst and second fl oor space. • Ideal downtown location with easy access to banks, shopping, restaurants and parking. For more information or to • Owner would lease back top 3 fl oors - 9,000 SF arrange for a tour please contact: • Signage opportunity Joseph F. Tosi 412.261.0200, ext. 471 [email protected] Arthur J. DiDonato, Jr. 412.261.0200, ext. 436 [email protected] Oxford Realty Services One Oxford Centre | 301 Grant Street | Suite 400 Pittsburgh, PA, 15219 www.oxfordrealtyservices.com 428 Boulevard of the Allies, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 One Oxford Centre Point Park University Art Institute of Pittsburgh Boulevard of the Allies Grant Street Interchange Although all information furnished regarding property for sale, rental or fi nancing is from sources deemed reliable, such information has not been verifi ed, and no express representation is made nor is any to be implied as to the accuracy thereof, and it is submitted subject to errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions, prior sale, lease or fi nancing, or withdrawal without notice. Rental terms and all dimensions are approximate and specifi cations are subject to change without notice. -
Penndot Project Information Boulevard of Allies And
PENNDOT PROJECT INFORMATION BOULEVARD OF ALLIES AND RAMPS BRIDGE PRESERVATION PROJECT SR 0885 SECTION A46 / SR 8004 SECTION A03 CITY OF PITTSBURGH, ALLEGHENY COUNTY PROJECT TEAM PENNDOT DESIGN DIVISION Direct Questions To: Cheryl Solosky, P.E. | Project Manager Phone: 412.429.5056 Email: [email protected] Nick Krobot, P.E. | Assistant Environmental Manager PENNDOT PRESS OFFICE Steve Cowan | District Press Officer PLEASE COMPLETE SURVEY AT END OF PRESENTATION Average Daily Traffic Boulevard of the Allies Bridges Project Summary RAMP U 12,593 Cost and Schedule: Veh./Day Allies • Westbound Estimated Construction Cost 27,637 Veh./Day $25M - $30M RAMP R 14,358 • Ramp S / Anticipated Construction Duration Veh./Day Allies Eastbound Spring 2021 – Fall 2022 24,657 Estimated Construction Cost and Duration will RAMP T Veh./Day 12,629 be updated during Final Design. Veh./Day RAMP V 10,610 • Project Purpose: To maintain safe and reliable travel on this portion of the Blvd. of Veh./Day the Allies and its connection to and from I-376/Parkway East. • Project Need: Due to the physical deficiencies of the existing bridges causing Fair to Poor Condition ratings. Major Construction Activities: • Bridge Expansion Dam Replacements • Bridge Repainting – All Steel Members • Bridge Deck Repairs and Overlays • New Pavement Markings • Bridge Structure Steel Repairs • Updated or New Signing • Bridge Bearing Replacements • Drainage Repairs • Bridge Concrete Substructure Repairs • Bridge Barrier Repairs Due to the site constraints of the project location and geometry, as well as most of the work occurring on limited access ramps to the interstate, it will not be feasible to provide pedestrian or bicycle facilities on these bridges through this project. -
Customer Service Between Carnegie and Bell Stations
100 West Busway - All Stops 33X West Busway to Downtown Only Transfer between 33X, 100 and Langley Sheraden HHerronerron other routes as shown below: High School LEGEND StationStation C ve. Blvd. h A Sheraden artiers SSheradenheraden O Herron A o StationStation H sbor 51 100 Service Hill I From Routes 100 and 33X to O ve. y St. C R 100/33X Service har nel Berr tie E Polish y Street rs A R ve. V Bigelow Blvd. Carnegie Station Tun Corliss St. I I ve. Berr R Hill Other Streets MiddletownM Rd. V lvd. W. West Carson B id Liberty A Baum Prospect A d E Y 25D - 31A - 31E - 33E - 33F le N to R Centre Ave. Park and Ride Lot Ingram w E n H R Bell Station ve. d Street G . Cathedral of Learning Craig St. E T Neville e C L n Stations h L William Pitt Student Union n Dithridge St Bayard St. C a n Ave. 28X y r A s Ingram Station e t Bellefield St. i Pen o n e St. t n e r ve. r s EAST BUSWAY Children's Hospital Bigelow Blvd.A v S A 9 Ellsworth A Ingram Ave. West End Bridge Downtown e Idlewood Station Bus Stops t t UPMC Presbyterian Hospital v Tito W Penn . Stanwix St. h PPennenn e e. t. 6 S UPMC Eye and Ear Hospital S . n t t be h . StationStation T u Pittsburgh e h t S 31A S Gateway View ay a t UPMC Montefiore Hospital c Time Points .