DOCSLIB.ORG

Earth's Tectonic Plates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Earth's Tectonic Plates Copyright © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Teaching TransparencyTeaching Master49 Transparency Tectonic Plates Earth’s MASTER 49 5.4 North American 1.8 Eurasian Plate Juan Plate 2.3 Divergent 3.7 de Fuca 5.4 boundary Plate Caribbean Philippine Convergent Plate 2.3 Arabian Plate boundary Cocos Plate 9.2 Plate 2.5 Pacific Plate Ridge axis 10.0 3.0 2.0 Transform African Plate 2.0 17.2 6.0 Earth theEnvironment, andtheUniverse Science:Geology, 10.5 boundary Nazca South American 6.2 Plate Plate Subduction zone TEACHING TRANSPARENCY Indian-Australian Plate 7.1 11.1 16.8 1.7 Zones of extension 4.1 within continents 10.3 6.0 1.3 7.3 3.7 3.3 Uncertain plate 7.7 7.5 7.2 boundary Antarctic Plate 5.0 Rate of movement 5.7 (cm/y) Use withChapter17 Section 17.3 97 Name Class Date WORKSHEET 49 TEACHING TRANSPARENCY Use with Chapter 17 Earth’s Tectonic Plates Section 17.3 1. In what direction is the Pacific Plate moving? 2. Are the Pacific Plate and the Antarctic Plate moving toward each other, away from each other, or past each other? Explain your answer. 3. What type of boundary separates the South American Plate from the Nazca Plate? Explain your answer. 4. Describe the relative motion between the North American Plate and the Pacific Plate. 5. Between which plates is the relative motion the fastest? 6. Would you predict that, over time, the distance between New York and Miami will increase, decrease, or stay the same? Explain your answer. 7. Would you predict that, over time, the distance between New York and Lisbon, a city is southern Europe, will increase, decrease, or stay the same? Explain your answer. Copyright © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. a division of the McGraw-Hill Copyright © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, 98 Transparency Worksheet 49 Earth Science: Geology, the Environment, and the Universe Teaching Transparency MASTER 50 TEACHING TRANSPARENCY Use with Chapter 17 Types of Plate Boundaries Section 17.3 A Rift valley Continental crust Volcanic mountain BCIsland arc Trench range Trench Continental crust Oceanic crust Oceanic crust Oceanic crust Subducting plate DEFolded Trench mountain range San Andreas Fault North Fracture American zones Plate Continental crust Pacific Plate Copyright © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. a division of the McGraw-Hill Copyright © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, Teaching Transparency Transparency Master 50 Earth Science: Geology, the Environment, and the Universe 99 Name Class Date WORKSHEET 50 TEACHING TRANSPARENCY Use with Chapter 17 Types of Plate Boundaries Section 17.3 1. Which diagram shows a divergent boundary? How do the plates move relative to each other at this type of boundary? 2. At a divergent boundary, what feature forms when two oceanic plates are involved? When two continental plates are involved? 3. Which diagram shows oceanic-oceanic convergence? Describe what occurs at this type of plate boundary. 4. The Himalayas are mountains that are forming as a result of the collision of the Indian and Eurasian continental plates. Which diagram shows a plate boundary like the one involved in the formation of these mountains? 5. Which diagram shows oceanic-continental convergence? Describe what occurs at this type of plate boundary. 6. Which diagram shows a transform boundary? Describe what occurs at this type of plate boundary. Copyright © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. a division of the McGraw-Hill Copyright © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, 100 Transparency Worksheet 50 Earth Science: Geology, the Environment, and the Universe Teaching Transparency T216 Name Class Date Name Class Date Answer Pages WORKSHEET 49 TEACHING TRANSPARENCY WORKSHEET 50 TEACHING TRANSPARENCY Use with Chapter 17 Use with Chapter 17 Earth’s Tectonic Plates Section 17.3 Types of Plate Boundaries Section 17.3 Earth theEnvironment, andtheUniverse Science:Geology, 1. In what direction is the Pacific Plate moving? 1. Which diagram shows a divergent boundary? How do the plates move relative to each other at this type of boundary? west or northwest A; The plates move apart from one another. 2. Are the Pacific Plate and the Antarctic Plate moving toward each other, away from each other, or past each other? Explain your answer. 2. At a divergent boundary, what feature forms when two oceanic plates are involved? When two continental plates are involved? The arrows along the plate boundaries point in opposite directions, indicating that the Pacific Plate and the Antarctic Plate are moving away from each other. an ocean ridge; a rift valley 3. Which diagram shows oceanic-oceanic convergence? Describe what occurs at this 3. What type of boundary separates the South American Plate from the Nazca Plate? Explain your answer. type of plate boundary. Arrows along the boundary between the South American Plate and the Nazca B; Two oceanic plates converge. One of the plates is subducted under the other. Plate point toward each other, indicating that the boundary between these two A deep-sea trench forms and magma rises to form an arc of volcanic islands. plates is a convergent boundary. 4. The Himalayas are mountains that are forming as a result of the collision of the Indian and Eurasian continental plates. Which diagram shows a plate boundary like 4. Describe the relative motion between the North American Plate and the Pacific Plate. the one involved in the formation of these mountains? These two plates are sliding past each other in some areas and converging D in others. 5. Which diagram shows oceanic-continental convergence? Describe what occurs at this type of plate boundary. 5. Between which plates is the relative motion the fastest? C; An oceanic plate collides with a continental plate. The oceanic plate, which is between the Nazca Plate and the Pacific Plate denser than the continental plate, subducts under the continental plate to form 6. Would you predict that, over time, the distance between New York and Miami will increase, decrease, or stay the same? Explain your answer. a trench and volcanoes. The distance between New York and Miami will likely stay the same because 6. Which diagram shows a transform boundary? Describe what occurs at this type of plate boundary. they are on the same plate. E; Two plates slide horizontally past each another, and crust is deformed or 7. Would you predict that, over time, the distance between New York and Lisbon, a city is southern Europe, will increase, decrease, or stay the same? Explain your answer. fractured. Long faults and earthquakes are characteristics of these boundaries. The distance between New York and Lisbon will increase because the cities are Teaching Transparency Masters Transparency Teaching on different plates and the plates are moving away from each other. 98 Transparency Worksheet 49 Earth Science: Geology, the Environment, and the Universe Teaching Transparency 100 Transparency Worksheet 50 Earth Science: Geology, the Environment, and the Universe Teaching Transparency Copyright © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cenozoic Changes in Pacific Absolute Plate Motion A
    CENOZOIC CHANGES IN PACIFIC ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS DECEMBER 2003 By Nile Akel Kevis Sterling Thesis Committee: Paul Wessel, Chairperson Loren Kroenke Fred Duennebier We certify that we have read this thesis and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Geology and Geophysics. THESIS COMMITTEE Chairperson ii Abstract Using the polygonal finite rotation method (PFRM) in conjunction with the hotspot- ting technique, a model of Pacific absolute plate motion (APM) from 65 Ma to the present has been created. This model is based primarily on the Hawaiian-Emperor and Louisville hotspot trails but also incorporates the Cobb, Bowie, Kodiak, Foundation, Caroline, Mar- quesas and Pitcairn hotspot trails. Using this model, distinct changes in Pacific APM have been identified at 48, 27, 23, 18, 12 and 6 Ma. These changes are reflected as kinks in the linear trends of Pacific hotspot trails. The sense of motion and timing of a number of circum-Pacific tectonic events appear to be correlated with these changes in Pacific APM. With the model and discussion presented here it is suggested that Pacific hotpots are fixed with respect to one another and with respect to the mantle. If they are moving as some paleomagnetic results suggest, they must be moving coherently in response to large-scale mantle flow. iii List of Tables 4.1 Initial hotspot locations .
    [Show full text]
  • Geodetic Determination of Relative Plate Motion and Crustal Deformation Across the Scotia-South America Plate Boundary in Eastern Tierra Del Fuego
    Article Geochemistry 3 Volume 4, Number 9 Geophysics 19 September 2003 1070, doi:10.1029/2002GC000446 GeosystemsG G ISSN: 1525-2027 AN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE EARTH SCIENCES Published by AGU and the Geochemical Society Geodetic determination of relative plate motion and crustal deformation across the Scotia-South America plate boundary in eastern Tierra del Fuego R. Smalley, Jr. Center for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3876 Central Avenue, Ste. 1, Memphis, Tennessee 38152, USA ([email protected]) E. Kendrick and M. G. Bevis School of Ocean, Earth and Space Technology, University of Hawaii, 1680 East West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) I. W. D. Dalziel and F. Taylor Institute of Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, 4412 Spicewood Springs Road, Building 600, Austin, Texas 78759, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) E. Laurı´a Instituto Geogra´fico Militar de Argentina, Cabildo 381, 1426 Buenos Aires, Argentina ([email protected]) R. Barriga Instituto Geogra´fico Militar de Chile, Nueva Santa Isabel 1640, Santiago, Chile ([email protected]) G. Casassa Centro de Estudios Cientı´ficos, Avda. Arturo Prat 514, Casilla 1469, Valdivia, Chile ([email protected]) E. Olivero and E. Piana Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas, Av. Malvinas Argentinas s/n, Caja de Correo 92, 9410 Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina ([email protected]; [email protected]) [1] Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements provide the first direct measurement of plate motion and crustal deformation across the Scotia-South America transform plate boundary in Tierra del Fuego.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Tectonic Reconstructions of the Southernmost Andes and the Scotia Sea During the Opening of the Drake Passage
    123 Chapter 4 Tectonic reconstructions of the Southernmost Andes and the Scotia Sea during the opening of the Drake Passage Graeme Eagles Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Marine and Polar Research, Bre- merhaven, Germany e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Study of the tectonic development of the Scotia Sea region started with basic lithological and structural studies of outcrop geology in Tierra del Fuego and the Antarctic Peninsula. To 19th and early 20th cen- tury geologists, the results of these studies suggested the presence of a submerged orocline running around the margins of the Scotia Sea. Subse- quent increases in detailed knowledge about the fragmentary outcrop ge- ology from islands distributed around the margins of the Scotia Sea, and later their interpretation in light of the plate tectonic paradigm, led to large modifications in the hypothesis such that by the present day the concept of oroclinal bending in the region persists only in vestigial form. Of the early comparative lithostratigraphic work in the region, only the likenesses be- tween Jurassic—Cretaceous basin floor and fill sequences in South Geor- gia and Tierra del Fuego are regarded as strong enough to be useful in plate kinematic reconstruction by permitting the interpretation of those re- gions’ contiguity in mid-Mesozoic times. Marine and satellite geophysical data sets reveal features of the remaining, submerged, 98% of the Scotia 124 Sea region between the outcrops. These data enable a more detailed and quantitative approach to the region’s plate kinematics. In contrast to long- used interpretations of the outcrop geology, these data do not prescribe the proximity of South Georgia to Tierra del Fuego in any past period.
    [Show full text]
  • West Antarctica: Tectonics and Paleogeography
    Chapter 2 West Antarctica: Tectonics and Paleogeography The origin of West Antarctica (WANT) can be traced back to the Terra Australis orogenesis that began between 520 Ma and 510 Ma—shortly after the terminal suturing of Gondwana (Boger 2011). The onset of this event was responsible for the termination of passive margin sedimentation along much of the Pacific margin of Gondwana and marks the beginning of widespread and broadly coeval deforma- tion and arc-type plutonism. It also began a long-lived process of accretion that added much of the crust that defines eastern Australia, West Antarctica (domain 5 of Boger 2011, Fig. 2.1), and western South America (Cawood 2005, 2009). Post-Gondwana accretionary growth—the Terra Australis and Gondwanide Orogenies—The suturing of the West Gondwana and Australo–Antarctic plates along the Kuunga Orogen brought to an end the long-lived process of convergence between the pre-collision components of Gondwana. The result was a reconfigura- tion of the early to middle Cambrian plate system and the consequent transfer of ocean floor consumption from between the pre-Gondwana cratons to the outboard Pacific margin of newly formed Gondwana supercontinent (Cawood2005 ). This led to the establishment of the accretionary Terra Austrais Orogen (Cawood 2005), a general name given to the orogenic belt that stretched continuously from north- ern South America to northern Australia and which began in the early to middle Cambrian and lasted until the late Carboniferous. In Antarctica Terra Australis (Ross) orogenesis also deformed and variably metamorphosed the pre-Gondwana passive margin (Fig. 2.2). The Gondwana supercontinent underwent a sequential fragmentation over approximately 165 Ma.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Is Divided Into Two Parts
    Earth-Science Reviews 140 (2015) 72–107 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Geologic and kinematic constraints on Late Cretaceous to mid Eocene plate boundaries in the southwest Pacific Kara J. Matthews a,⁎, Simon E. Williams a, Joanne M. Whittaker b,R.DietmarMüllera, Maria Seton a, Geoffrey L. Clarke a a EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia b Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, TAS 7001, Australia article info abstract Article history: Starkly contrasting tectonic reconstructions have been proposed for the Late Cretaceous to mid Eocene (~85– Received 25 November 2013 45 Ma) evolution of the southwest Pacific, reflecting sparse and ambiguous data. Furthermore, uncertainty in Accepted 30 October 2014 the timing of and motion at plate boundaries in the region has led to controversy around how to implement a Available online 7 November 2014 robust southwest Pacific plate circuit. It is agreed that the southwest Pacific comprised three spreading ridges during this time: in the Southeast Indian Ocean, Tasman Sea and Amundsen Sea. However, one and possibly Keywords: two other plate boundaries also accommodated relative plate motions: in the West Antarctic Rift System Southwest Pacific fi Lord Howe Rise (WARS) and between the Lord Howe Rise (LHR) and Paci c. Relevant geologic and kinematic data from the South Loyalty Basin region are reviewed to better constrain its plate motion history during this period, and determine the time- Late Cretaceous dependent evolution of the southwest Pacific regional plate circuit. A model of (1) west-dipping subduction Subduction and basin opening to the east of the LHR from 85–55 Ma, and (2) initiation of northeast-dipping subduction Plate circuit and basin closure east of New Caledonia at ~55 Ma is supported.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation on Pacific Plate and Associated Boundaries
    PACIFIC PLATE AND ASSOCIATED BOUNDARIES The Pacific Plate • Pacific Plate is the largest plate and an oceanic plate. • It shares its boundaries with numerous plates namely; North American Plate.(Convergent and transform fault) Philippine Plate.(Convergent) Juan de Fuca Plate.(Convergent) Indo – Australian Plate.(Convergent, Transform Fault) Cocos Plate.(Divergent) Nazca Plate.(Divergent) Antarctic Plate.(Divergent,Transform Fault) Types of Plate Boundaries • Convergent Boundary: Subduction zones where two plates converges. Eg; Aleutian Islands(Alaska) • Divergent Boundary: Spreading centres where two plates move away from each other. Eg; East Pacific Rise (MOR, Pacific Ocean). • Transform Faults: Boundary where two plates slide past each other. For Eg. ; San Andreas Fault. BOUNDARY WITH ANTARCTIC PLATE DIVERGENT BOUNDARY • Pacific – Antarctic Ridge TRANSFORM FAULT • Louisville Seamount Chain Pacific – Antarctic Ridge Pacific – Antarctic Ridge(PAR) is located on the seafloor of the South Pacific Ocean. It is driven by the interaction of a mid oceanic ridge and deep mantle plumes located in the eastern portion of East Pacific Ridge. Louisville Seamount Chain It is the longest line of seamount chain in the Pacific Ocean of about 4,300 km, formed along the transform boundary in the western side between Pacific plate and Antarctic plate. It was formed from the Pacific Plate sliding over a long – lived centre of upwelling magma called the Louisville hotspot. BOUNDARY WITH PHILIPPINE PLATE CONVERGENT BOUNDARY • Izu – Ogasawara Trench • Mariana Trench Izu – Ogasawara Trench It is an oceanic trench in the western Pacific Ocean. It stretches from Japan to northern most section of Mariana Trench. Here, the Pacific Plate is being subducted beneath the Philippine Sea Plate.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazca Plate Region) GRENADA 80°W 60°W 40°W 11900900 a A' 1 1 1 2 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 BARBADOS Compiled by Gavin P
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT 2015–1031-E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY This report supplements Open-File Report 2010–1083-E 80°W 70°W 60°W 50°W PRE-INSTRUMENTAL SEISMICITY 1500 – 1899 SAINT LUCIA Seismicity of the Earth 1900–2013 BARBADOS Deaths, tsunami, MMI VIII+, or M 8 SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HONDURAS M 8.5 labeled with year ARUBA CURAÇAO Seismotectonics of South America (Nazca Plate Region) GRENADA 80°W 60°W 40°W 11900900 A A' 1 1 1 2 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 BARBADOS Compiled by Gavin P. Hayes, Gregory M. Smoczyk, Harley M. Benz, Antonio Villaseñor, TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CURAÇAO NICARAGUA Barranquilla Maracaibo Caracas HONDURAS GRENADA 3 Valencia Maracay Demerara Plain and Kevin P. Furlong Cartagena TRENCH AXIS Managua Barquisimeto NICARAGUA 19921992 0 2014 11950950 Clark Basin 10° COSTA RICA PANAMA 1U.S. Geological Survey VENEZUELA 2 GUYANA Institute of Earth Sciences, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain COSTA RICA Panama FRENCH 3Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa., USA San Jose Cucuta VENEZUELA SURINAME GUIANA 10°N 11983983 PANAMA –200 COLOMBIA Bucaramanga TECTONIC SUMMARY 19341934 GUYANA Equator The South American arc extends over 7,000 kilometers (km), from the Chilean margin triple junction offshore of southern Chile, to Medellin Equator ECUADOR its intersection with the Panama fracture zone, offshore of the southern coast of Panama in Central America. It marks the plate –400 Manizales FRENCH boundary between the subducting Nazca plate and the South America plate, where the oceanic crust and lithosphere of the Nazca Bogota SURINAME PROFILE A plate begin their descent into the mantle beneath South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Deciphering Detailed Plate Kinematics of the Indian Ocean and Developing
    DCS-DST NEWS January 2013 identified complexities. With an aim to develop such a unified model for the plate tectonic evolution of the Indian DECIPHERING DETAILED PLATE Ocean in high resolution, a project was initiated, under the auspices of an Indian-Australian-French collaboration, KINEMATICS OF THE INDIAN OCEAN for the synthesis of all data available with the Indian, AND DEVELOPING A UNIFIED MODEL Australian and French scientists and work towards a unified high resolution plate tectonic model of the Indian FOR EAST GONDWANALAND Ocean. RECONSTRUCTION: AN INDIAN- AUSTRALIAN-FRENCH INITIATIVE INTRODUCTION The configuration of continents, continental fragments and the deep-sea regions in the Indian Ocean (Fig. 1), as we see it today, results from the fragmentation V. YATHEESH1, J. DYMENT2, and dispersal of Gondwanaland since the Jurassic ~ 152 G.C. BHATTACHARYA1, R.D. MULLER3 million years ago. In this framework, the Indian Ocean 1CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, was formed by the rifting and subsequent drifting of Goa-403 004, India Africa, Antarctica, Australia, and India, to cite only the 2Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris & CNRS, main continental blocks. The deep ocean basins in the Paris Sorbonne Cite, France Indian Ocean contain the imprints of this plate tectonic 3School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, history, which is further affected by several major events NSW 2006, Australia such as Kerguelen, Marion and Reunion hotspots E-mail: [email protected] volcanism, the India-Eurasia collision and the compressive deformation of the Central Indian and ABSTRACT Wharton basins. The Indian Ocean formed as a result of the A first general model for evolution of the whole fragmentation and dispersal of Gondwanaland since the Indian Ocean was proposed by McKenzie and Sclater Jurassic.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Tracks of Hotspots and Current Plate Velocities
    Geophys. J. Int. (2002) 150, 321–361 Young tracks of hotspots and current plate velocities Alice E. Gripp1,∗ and Richard G. Gordon2 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97401, USA 2Department of Earth Science MS-126, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted 2001 October 5. Received 2001 October 5; in original form 2000 December 20 SUMMARY Plate motions relative to the hotspots over the past 4 to 7 Myr are investigated with a goal of determining the shortest time interval over which reliable volcanic propagation rates and segment trends can be estimated. The rate and trend uncertainties are objectively determined from the dispersion of volcano age and of volcano location and are used to test the mutual consistency of the trends and rates. Ten hotspot data sets are constructed from overlapping time intervals with various durations and starting times. Our preferred hotspot data set, HS3, consists of two volcanic propagation rates and eleven segment trends from four plates. It averages plate motion over the past ≈5.8 Myr, which is almost twice the length of time (3.2 Myr) over which the NUVEL-1A global set of relative plate angular velocities is estimated. HS3-NUVEL1A, our preferred set of angular velocities of 15 plates relative to the hotspots, was constructed from the HS3 data set while constraining the relative plate angular velocities to consistency with NUVEL-1A. No hotspots are in significant relative motion, but the 95 per cent confidence limit on motion is typically ±20 to ±40 km Myr−1 and ranges up to ±145 km Myr−1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic/Cenozoic Tectonic Events Around Australia
    Mesozoic/Cenozoic Tectonic Events Around Australia 1 1 2 R. Dietmar Mtiller , Carmen Gaina , Anahita Tikku , Dona Mihue, 4 5 Steven C. Cande , and Joann M. Stock We use an absolute and relative plate motion model for the plates around Australia to identify major plate tectonic events, evaluate their causes, and inves­ tigate their effects on anomalous intraplate subsidence or uplift and on the history of oceanic crustal accretion. An event at -136 Ma is marked by the onset of sea floor spreading between Greater India and Australia. At about this time long­ lived subduction east of Australia ceased, probably due to subduction of the Phoenix-Pacific spreading ridge, changing this plate boundary to a transform margin. Between 130 and 80 Ma, Australia and East Antarctica moved eastward in the Atlantic-Indian mantle hotspot reference frame. This can be plausibly linked to ridge push from the NW -SE oriented spreading center NW of Australia and to the inferred geometry and continued subduction of the Phoenix plate beneath the West Antarctic margin. A drastic change in spreading direction between the Indian and Australian plates from NE-SW toN-S occurred at about 99 Ma, possibly caused by a change in absolute motion of the Pacific Plate. Chron 27 (-61 Ma) marks the onset of relative motion between East and West Antarctica, and a change in the relative motion between Australia and Antarctica. It may be linked to the subduction of a segment of the Neo-Tethyan Ridge. Both events caused anomalous subsidence on the Northwest Shelf of Australia. The almost stationary position of Australia w.r.t.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Drilling Project Initial Reports Volume 35
    1. INTRODUCTION, PRINCIPAL RESULTS—LEG 35 DEEP SEA DRILLING PROJECT1 Charles D. Hollister, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts and Campbell Craddock, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin Leg 35 was the third DSDP cruise to undertake drill- Gansser (1973a) argues that block-faulting rather than ing in Antarctic waters and the first in the Southeast compression has predominated in the Andes during the Pacific Basin; the others were Legs 28 and 29 in the Cenozoic. Southwest Pacific which took place during the austral The intersection of the Chile Ridge separates the ac- summer of 1972/1973. tive central Andes from the relatively quiescent southern Glomar Challenger departed Callao, Peru, on 13 Andes. The central Andes are marked by many active February 1974 and sailed to Valparaiso, Chile, to take volcanoes and earthquakes, but the southern Andes on additional personnel, equipment, and supplies prior contain only two active volcanoes and the infrequent to departing for Antarctic waters. The cruise ended on earthquakes are widely spaced (Gonzalez-Ferran, 1972). 30 March 1974 at Ushuaia, Argentina, after steaming The rocks of coastal West Antarctica record a com- approximately 5239 n. mi. at an average speed of 7.7 plex history of Phanerozoic sedimentation, volcanism, knots. plutonism, metamorphism, and orogenic deformation. During this unusually short leg a variety of mechani- However, no rocks of certain Precambrian age are cal and weather problems severely limited our drilling presently known. Several orogenic cycles have been program and only 8 days were spent with pipe in the sea identified; the youngest is the Andean of Cretaceous to floor.
    [Show full text]
  • II. World Map - Label the Ocean Basins A
    G4 U8 L1 II. World Map - Label the Ocean basins A. Review the I can statements once again, distribute the Student Worksheet World Map, and have students label the ocean basins. Walk around the classroom and check for understanding and accuracy. B. After students have labeled their world map with the ocean names, engage students in discussion with the following questions: 1. Which Ocean is the largest? (Pacific) 2. Which Ocean is between North America and Europe? (Atlantic) 3. Which Ocean is bordered by Africa, Asia, and Australia? (Indian) C. Develop the concept that the Ocean is one big system. Refer to the Ocean Literacy Essential Principles to aide in this discussion. http://www.coexploration.org/oceanliteracy/documents/OceanLitChart.pdf All answers are “yes” but responses may lead to class discussion 1. Are the ocean basins connected? 2. Does the ocean and life in the ocean shape the features of the Earth? 3. Is the ocean a major influence on weather and climate? 4. Does the ocean make Earth habitable? 5. Does the ocean support a great diversity of life and ecosystems? 6. Are the ocean and humans interconnected? 7. Is the ocean largely unexplored? III. Coordinate Mapping Longitude and Latitude Note: This activity should not be the first introduction to Longitude and Latitude.The background for this activity is in another content area. A. Show the PowerPoint, Where is Hawai‘i?, and using the notes on each slide to teach the lesson. Tell students to take notes in their journals. Have ready copies of the map of your county taken from the power point for each student.
    [Show full text]