DOCSLIB.ORG

An Overview of Cooperatives in Turkey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Overview of Cooperatives in Turkey FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Policy Studies on Rural Transition No. 2013-3 An overview of cooperatives in Turkey Nedret Durutan Okan Cüneyt Okan 2013 The Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia of the Food and Agriculture Organization distributes this policy study to disseminate findings of work in progress and to encourage the exchange of ideas within FAO and all others interested in development issues. This paper carries the name of the authors and should be used and cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations and conclusions are the authors’ own and should not be attributed to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, its management, or any member countries. This paper was prepared within the “Cooperatives and their alternatives” component of the Agrarian Structures Initiative (ASI) which a regional program of FAO in Europe and Central Asia. The aim of this project is to identify the advantages, disadvantages of integrating small farms into markets through farmer cooperative groups and direct contracting in the region. Studies are prepared in different countries of the region to understand the enabling environment for these institutional innovations, and to propose policy changes in order to develop inclusive and fair value chains. More information on the Agrarian Structures Initiative and its projects is available here: http://www.fao.org/europe/agrarian-structures-initiative/en/ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS ...............................................................................................6 A. HISTORY OF COOPERATIVE MOVEMENT IN TURKEY ........................................................8 Ahi Movement in pre-Ottoman Era .................................................................................................8 Country Chests during Ottoman Era ................................................................................................9 Movement by Fig Producers ......................................................................................................... 10 B. HISTORY OF STATE SUPPORT TO COOPERATIVES ............................................................ 11 Early Years of Republic ................................................................................................................ 11 Planned Period of National Development (1962 - today) ............................................................... 12 C. TYPES OF COOPERATIVES IN TURKEY ................................................................................ 14 Number of members ..................................................................................................................... 14 Primary cooperatives by type ........................................................................................................ 14 D. AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES ......................................................................................... 15 Classification of Agricultural Cooperatives ................................................................................... 15 Sub- categories of service cooperatives ......................................................................................... 16 E. MINISTRIES AND THEIR MANDATES FOR AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES ............... 18 1. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock (MFAL) ............................................................... 18 Agricultural Development Cooperatives (ADCs) ...................................................................... 19 Irrigation Cooperatives (ICs) .................................................................................................... 23 Fisheries Cooperatives (FCs) .................................................................................................... 24 Sugar Beet Growers’ Cooperatives (SBGCs) ............................................................................ 24 Agricultural Credit Cooperatives (ACCs).................................................................................. 26 2. Ministry of Customs and Trade (MoCT) ................................................................................... 31 Agricultural Sales Cooperatives (ASCs) ................................................................................... 31 F. APEX ORGANIZATIONS ........................................................................................................... 35 Unions (Area or Region-based) ..................................................................................................... 35 Central Unions.............................................................................................................................. 38 National Cooperatives Union (NCU) ............................................................................................ 39 G. WOMEN’s COOPERATIVES ..................................................................................................... 41 H. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................. 43 I. TAXATION .................................................................................................................................. 45 J. AUDITING ................................................................................................................................... 47 K. NATIONAL COOPERATIVE STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN, 2012-2016 .......................... 49 L. OVERVIEW OF PERFORMANCE OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES ........................... 51 1. FAILURES OR WEAKNESSES OF COOPERATIVES ........................................................... 51 3 2. WEAKNESSES OF NATIONAL COOPERATIVE SYSTEM .................................................. 55 3. STRENGTHS AND SUCCESSES ............................................................................................ 57 PROSPECTS FOR INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION .......................................................... 61 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 62 FAO Policy Studies on Rural Transition ........................................................................................... 64 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. DEVELOPMENT IN THE COOPERATIVE SECTORS BY YEARS ................................................................. 12 TABLE 2. THE TOP EIGHT COOPERATIVES (2011) .............................................................................................. 14 TABLE 3. THE TYPES OF PRIMARY COOPERATIVES WITH THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF MEMBERS (2011) ............. 14 TABLE 4. TYPES OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES UNDER MFAL (2011) ......................................................... 19 TABLE 5. UNION OF AGRICULTURAL SALES COOPERATIVES AND THEIR CORE BUSINESSES ................................ 32 TABLE 6. UNIONS ESTABLISHED BY PRIMARY COOPERATIVES .......................................................................... 35 TABLE 7. CENTRAL UNIONS ESTABLISHED BY REGIONAL UNIONS .................................................................... 38 TABLE 8. FRAGMENTATION UNDER CENTRAL UNIONS ..................................................................................... 39 TABLE 9. WOMEN’S COOPERATIVES IN TURKEY ............................................................................................... 41 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The Master Ahi Evran and an accession ceremony for the organization ............................................... 8 Figure 2. Mithat Paşa, the Governor of Nish (Balkans) and the founder of the Country Chests of the Ottoman Empire ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 3. Three fig producers who initiated the process for the establishment of TARİŞ Union of Fig Producers in 1912 ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4. Ataturk and the first Parliament, 1923 ............................................................................................. 11 Figure 5. First workers (60’s) in Europe sent by the through the Project: Granting Priority to Villagers Who Set up Cooperatives for the Purpose of Sending Labor to Europe. ................................................................. 20 Figure 6. The mobile milk quality laboratory of Burdur Köy-Koop. .................................................................... 21 Figure 7. Milk quality laboratory in Burdur KÖY-KOOP facilities. ....................................................................... 21 Figure 8. Members of Kastamonu Forestry Cooperative on the job, Western Black Sea..................................... 21 Figure 9. Modern greenhouses of Vakıflı Village Agricultural Development Cooperative; Hatay in Mediterranean Region ................................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 10. Recent investment made for pressurized system Eminler Irrigation Cooperative; Karaman, C. Anatolia .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 Figure 11. Çoğuplu Village Irrigation Cooperative in Uşak, Aegean Region ..................................................... 23 Figure 12.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    441 _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 13, No. 2, June 2018__________ RARE LEAF BEETLES RECORDS FOR THE FAUNA OF TURKEY (CHRYSOMELIDAE) Neslihan Bal*, Hüseyin Özdikmen*, Hakan Özdamar* and Suat Kıyak* * Gazi University, Science Faculty, Department of Biology, 06500 Ankara, TURKEY. E- mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] [Bal, N., Özdikmen, H., Özdamar, H. & Kıyak, S. 2018. Rare leaf beetles records for the fauna of Turkey (Chrysomelidae). Munis Entomology & Zoology, 13 (2): 441-446] ABSTRACT: We had the opportunity to study some rare material of Chrysomelidae collected during the expedition of Çankırı province in 2013-2015. As a result of this, a total of 10 rare species (3 species of Donaciinae, 1 species of Clytrinae, 2 species of Chrysomelinae and 4 species of Galerucinae) of Turkish leaf beetles were determined. All species are the first record for Çankırı province. Especially, 5 species of them are the second records for Turkey as Donacia cinerea Herbst in after 43 years and Plateumaris consimilis (Schrank) in after 7 years to the subfamily Donaciinae, Chrysolina analis (Linnaeus) in after 7 years and Colaphellus sophiae amasiae Machatschke in after 64 years to the subfamily Chrysomelinae, Calomicrus circumfusus (Marsham) in after 4 years and Luperus floralis Faldermann in after 15 years to the subfamily Galerucinae. In addition 5 of them are the new records for Western Black Sea region of Turkey, and also 4 of them are the new records for Central Anatolian region of Turkey. KEY WORDS: Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, fauna, new records, Çankırı, Turkey This work is based on the specimens collected from Çankırı province.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Olive and Olive Oil Sectoral Innovation System: a Functional - Structural Analysis
    TURKISH OLIVE AND OLIVE OIL SECTORAL INNOVATION SYSTEM: A FUNCTIONAL - STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY NİLGÜN PEHLİVAN GÜRKAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE PROGRAMME OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY STUDIES OCTOBER 2015 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. M. Teoman Pamukçu Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mücahit Taha Özkaya Prof. Dr. Erkan Erdil Co-Supervisor Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Erkan Erdil (METU, ECON) _________________________ Prof. Dr. M. Teoman Pamukçu (METU, STPS) _________________________ Prof. Dr. Onur Yıldırım (METU, ECON) _________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Renan Tunalıoğlu (AMU, AGR) _________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mücahit Taha Özkaya (AU, AGR) _________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Yılmaz Üstüner (METU, ADM) _________________________ I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Nilgün PEHLİVAN GÜRKAN Signature : iii ABSTRACT TURKISH OLIVE AND OLIVE OIL SECTORAL INNOVATION SYSTEM: A FUNCTIONAL - STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Nilgün PEHLİVAN GÜRKAN Ph.D,.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue “The Next Marmara Earthquake: Disaster Mitigation
    Hori et al. Earth, Planets and Space (2017) 69:65 DOI 10.1186/s40623-017-0648-9 PREFACE Open Access Special issue “The next Marmara earthquake: disaster mitigation, recovery, and early warning” Takane Hori1*, Ali Pinar2, Ocal Necmioglu2, Muneo Hori3 and Azusa Nishizawa4 Te Marmara Sea, accommodating the fault segments of with Mw = 7.25 on the Main Marmara Fault is expected a major transform fault, is well known as a seismic gap to heavily damage or destroy 2–4% of the near 1,000,000 along the North Anatolian Fault (NAF), running through buildings in Istanbul, which has a population of around the northern part of Turkey and connecting the East 13 million, with 9–15% of the buildings receiving Anatolian convergent area with the Hellenic subduction medium damage and 20–34% of the buildings lightly zone (e.g., Pınar 1943; Toksöz et al. 1979; Pondard et al. damaged (Erdik 2013). 2007; Şengör et al. 2014). It is obvious from historical Te aim of this special issue is to gather information records spanning more than 2000 years that the region about the risk of another Marmara earthquake from the is subject to frequent strong shaking that is likely associ- latest geophysical, geological, geotechnical, computa- ated with tsunami waves, threatening heavily populated tional, and building science research results to discuss and industrialized locations (Ambraseys 2002; Erdik et al. ways of mitigating disaster in advance. Te collection 2004; Hébert et al. 2005). In the twentieth century, mag- of 12 papers constituting this special issue is based on nitude (M) 7-class earthquakes sequentially occurred recent research on imaging the crustal structure, the from east to west along the NAF zone, as shown in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Urbanization Dynamics in Turkey's Marmara Region Using CORINE Data Between 2006 and 2018
    remote sensing Article Assessing Urbanization Dynamics in Turkey’s Marmara Region Using CORINE Data between 2006 and 2018 Özlem Altınkaya Genel 1,2 and ChengHe Guan 3,4,* 1 Kenniscentrum NoorderRuimte, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen Zernikeplein 1, 9747 AS Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Architecture and Design, Özye˘ginUniversity, Orman Sk.13, Istanbul˙ 34794, Turkey 3 Arts and Sciences, New York University Shanghai, 1555 Century Avenue, Pudong New District, Shanghai 200122, China 4 Shanghai Key Laboratory of Urban Renewal and Spatial Optimization Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200122, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This study investigated the urban growth dynamics of urban regions. The study area was the Marmara Region, one of the most densely populated and ecologically diverse areas in Turkey. Using CORINE land cover data for 2006, 2012, and 2018, the study utilized multiple correspondence analyses and cluster analyses, to analyze land cover changes. The resulting maps, visualized in GIS, revealed the rapid urban transformation of the regional structure, formerly comprised of four distinct areas, into a more complex structure, in which densification and sprawl occur simultaneously. Our findings demonstrated a dissonance between the spatial dynamics of the Marmara Region during the study period, and the capacity and scope of the simultaneously initiated regional policies and mega-projects. This uncoordinated approach has endangered the region’s sustainable development. The paper, therefore, discusses the importance of land use planning and transboundary collaboration Citation: Genel, Ö.A.; Guan, C. for sustainable regional development. Beyond the local case, the results contribute to critical theories Assessing Urbanization Dynamics in in regional planning by linking theory and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Coordinating Office
    150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Tel: 41 22 791 6033 Fax: 41 22 791 6506 e-mail: [email protected] Appeal Coordinating Office Turkey Earthquake Rehabilitation – METR11 Appeal Target: US$ 491,499 Balance requested from ACT Network: US$ 331,499 Geneva, 18 January 2001 Dear Colleagues, On 17 August 1999 and again on 12 November 1999 earthquakes measuring 7.4 and 7.1 on the Richter scale, respectively, hit Turkey in areas east of Istanbul. The first earthquake rocked the Marmara Region of Turkey. The second earthquake occurred on the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) with a macro-seismic epicentre near the town of Golcuk (Kocaeli Province) in the western part of Turkey. With a great deal of the emergency needs now met, the government, local and international agencies and NGOs are focussing their efforts from relief to recovery operations. There is currently a considerable need for reconstruction and rehabilitation projects targeting the most vulnerable communities and earthquake survivors. Over a year after the first earthquake, many families are just now beginning to rebuild their lives and return to a degree of normalcy. However, for many others still living in tents and makeshift shelters, the winter will continue to challenge their daily means of living and subsistence. One year after the earthquakes, The United Methodist Committee on Relief (UMCOR) conducted a needs assessment in the areas of Golcuk and Duzce which revealed that a large segment of the population is without any form of livelihood. A large proportion of the population in the earthquake-affected zones worked in factories prior to the earthquakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Anatolia Project (Gap) Regional Development Administration Coverage
    SOUTHEAST ANATOLIA PROJECT (GAP) REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION COVERAGE • SOUTHEAST ANATOLIA PROJECT(GAP) • GAP ACTON PLAN (2008-2012) • GAP ACTON PLAN (2014-2018) • GAP REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION (GAP RDA) • INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES • COMPETITIVE AGENDA GAP REGION TURKEY – GAP COMPARISION TURKEY GAP GAP/TR (%) Total Area (km2) 779 452 75 193 9.7 Population (milyon)* 77.69 8.25 10.6 Annual Population Growth Rate 13.31 18.88 (thousand)(2013-2014) * 2014 Results of Address Based Population Registration System LAND POTENTIAL TOTAL AREA GAP REGION OTHER 9.7 % 90.3 % ECONOMICALLY IRRIGABLE AREA GAP REGION 20.0 % OTHER 80.0 % TURKEY’S WATER POTANTIAL BY BASIN Euphrates-Tigris 28 72 Other EUPHRATES OTHER 17% 47% TIGRIS 11% EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN WESTERN ANTALYA EASTERN 6% BLACK SEA 6% BLACK SEA 5% 8% DEVELOPMENT STAGES of GAP •1936 Establishment of Electrical Power Resources Survey and Development Administration •1960 The studies on Euphrates and Tigris rivers •1977 Bringing together all studies under GAP (GAP Water based Development Project Package) • 1986 State Planning Organization (SPO) as coordinating body for the integrated regional development project of GAP • 1989 GAP Master Plan • 1989 Establishment of the GAP Regional Development Administration • 2002 GAP Regional Development Plan (2002-2010) • 2008 GAP Action Plan (2008-2012) • 2014 GAP Action Plan (2014-2018) GAP WATER and SOIL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME EUPHRATES TIGRIS Karakaya Dam/HPP Dicle - Kralkızı Aşağı Fırat Batman Sınır Fırat Batman - Silvan Suruc – Baziki Garzan Adıyaman – Kahta Ilısu Adıyaman–Göksu–Araban Cizre Gaziantep Total water potential of Turkey :186 billion m³. 32 billion m³ from Euphrates and 21 billion m³ from Tigris, GAP Region 53 billion m³.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic and Social Impact of COVID-19 on Women and Men
    The economic and social impact of COVID-19 on women and men Rapid Gender Assessment of COVID-19 implications in Turkey ©2020 UN Women. All rights reserved. Published by UN Women Turkey Office Lead Author: Dr. Yasemin Kalaylıoğlu Contributing Authors: Arif Mert Öztürk, Gözde Bingüler Eker This publication reflects the findings of a rapid gender assessment of immediate social and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on women and men in Turkey, commissioned by UN Women in April 2020. It is based on a nationally representative survey among women and men, conducted by research company SAM Araştırma Danışmanlık A.Ş. The rapid gender assessment was conducted with the generous contribution and support of Sweden through Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of UN Women, the United Nations, any of its associated organizations or the offical position of Sweden. 2 Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................... 4 TABLE OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2. SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration
    BULLETIN OF THE MINERAL RESEARCH AND EXPLORATION Foreign Edition 2013 146 CONTENTS From Editor... A New Age Finding In The Central Sakarya Region (NW Turkey) ...................................................................................................................................................M. Fuat UĞUZ 1 Description Of Two New Families, Three New Species and Re-Description Of Four known Genera And One Subfamily From The Larger Benthic Foraminifera Of Paleocene In Turkey ................................................................................................................................................ Ercüment SİREL 27 The Ostracod Fauna And Environmental Characteristics Of The Volcanosedimentary Yolüstü Formation In The Hınıs Region, Erzurum (Eastern Anatolia), Turkey ..................................................................................................................................................... Ümit ŞAFAK 55 Petrogenetic Characteristics Of Oyaca – Kedikayası – Boyalık Adakites In SW Ankara (Central Anatolia, Turkey): Evidences For Slab Melt Metasomatism .................................................................................................................................. Pınar ŞEN and Erdal ŞEN 81 Hydrogeochemical And Isotopic Investigation Of Nasrettin Hoca Springs, Eskisehir, Turkey ....................... Mehmet ÇELİK, U. Erdem DOKUZ, P. Elif TÜRKÖZ, Özlem GÜLLÜ and Şebnem ARSLAN 93 Neogene Stratigraphy Of The Eskişehir Graben And The Investigation Of Coal Deposition By Seismic
    [Show full text]
  • Large Scale Industrial Enterprises in Turkish Industry: Their Structures, Characteristics and Spatial Distribution
    Prace Komisji Geografii Przemysłu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego Studies of the Industrial Geography Commission of the Polish Geographical Society 29 (1) · 2015 KADIR TEMURÇIN Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey Large scale industrial enterprises in Turkish industry: their structures, characteristics and spatial distribution Abstract: Industrialization is a process which is based on precise and quantitative measurements and contains different basic changes in the economic structure of a country or region. The structural character- istics and spatial distribution of the industrial enterprises established during the industrialization process which is one of the most important elements of the socio-economic transformation in Turkey within a historical process has been the object of this study. The aim of the study was to establish the positions and significance of one thousand (1000) large industrial companies in the industry of Turkey by using the framework of criteria based on sales from production which have been maintained by the Istanbul Chamber of Industry on a regular basis. The workplace and number of employees of the companies on a province basis, sector based division, realized exports and sales from product output, corporate enti- ties, structures, spatial distribution and other characteristics were taken into consideration in the study. Although the thousand large scale companies in Turkey based on production output sales comprised only 0.40% of the enterprises active in the industrial sector in 2012, they comprised 12% of the labor force, 59.6% of product output sales and 65.2% of all exports. On a regional basis, 54% of these companies are located in the Marmara region, 13.2% are located in Central Anatolia and 12.4% are located in the Aegean region; on a province basis, 63.4% are located in Istanbul, Izmir, Bursa, Kocaeli and Ankara.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential of Regional Centers in Turkey Related to Growth of the Core Regions
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gezici, Ferhan Conference Paper The Potential of Regional Centers in Turkey Related to Growth of the Core Regions 39th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional Cohesion and Competitiveness in 21st Century Europe", August 23 - 27, 1999, Dublin, Ireland Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Gezici, Ferhan (1999) : The Potential of Regional Centers in Turkey Related to Growth of the Core Regions, 39th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional Cohesion and Competitiveness in 21st Century Europe", August 23 - 27, 1999, Dublin, Ireland, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/114244 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • BURSA KOOPERATİFÇİLİĞİNİN VİZYONU Panel Ve Çalıştay Raporu
    BURSA KOOPERATİFÇİLİĞİNİN VİZYONU Panel ve Çalıştay Raporu Bursa Ticaret İl Müdürlüğü Bursa Eskişehir Bilecik Kalkınma Ajansı (BEBKA) BURSA KOOPERATİFÇİLİĞİNİN VİZYONU PANEL ve ÇALIŞTAYI ÇALIŞMA GRUBU Yeni Yalova Yolu 4.Km Buttim İş Merkezi Buttim Plaza Kat 6 16250 Osmangazi/Bursa TÜRKİYE Bursa Eskişehir Bilecik Kalkınma Ajansı (BEBKA) Bursa Yatırım Destek Ofisi T. 0224 211 13 27 • F. 0224 211 13 29 [email protected] • www.bebka.org.tr Bursa Ticaret İl Müdürlüğü twitter.com/tcbebka Raporu Hazırlayanlar Bursa Eskişehir Bilecik Kalkınma Ajansı (BEBKA) Bursa Yatırım Destek Ofisi Bursa Yatırım Destek Ofisi Yeni Yalova Yolu 4.Km Buttim İş Merkezi Buttim Plaza Kat 6 16250 Osmangazi/Bursa TÜRKİYE T. 0224 211 13 27 • F. 0224 211 13 29 [email protected] • www.bursainvest.gov.tr © BEBKA tarafından hazırlanmış ve yayımlanmıştır. Özel ve tüzel kişiler tarafından çoğaltılamaz, dağıtılamaz ve satılamaz. İzinsiz kullanılamaz. Bursa Eskişehir Bilecik Kalkınma Ajansı (BEBKA) Ekim 2016 Sunuş Sunuş Kooperatifler; yardımlaşma ve dayanışma gibi değerlerin öne çıktığı girişimler olarak diğer işletme Temelinde işbirliği, dayanışma, kendi kendine yardım, demokratik yönetim gibi unsurların bulundu- tiplerinden ayrılmaktadır. Bu sebeple, kooperatifçilik, bireylerin ve toplumun ekonomik ve sosyal ğu kooperatif girişim modeli, üreticilere ve topluma önemli avantajlar sağlamaktadır. kalkınması açısından önem taşımaktadır. Ayrıca, birçok ülkede kooperatifler, kamu ve özel sektör- den sonra üçüncü sektör olarak ön plana çıkmaktadır. Bilinçli üretim, mesleki bilgilerde yeterlilik, diğer ortaklarla işbirliği, üretim maliyetlerinin azaltılması, büyük pazarlara ulaşabilme ve verimliliğin arttırılması gibi ekonominin vazgeçilmez öğelerini koope- Onuncu Kalkınma Planı’nda ortak iş yapma kültürüne, sermaye birikimine ve gelir dağılımına olumlu ratif girişimleri ortaklarına sunabilmektedir. katkıları açısından önem taşıyan kooperatifçiliğin geliştirilmesine vurgu yapılmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Physical and Mechanical Properties of Turkish Hazelnut (Corylus Colurna L.) Wood
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL "MACHINES. TECHNOLOGIES. MATERIALS." WEB ISSN 1314-507X; PRINT ISSN 1313-0226 SOME PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF TURKISH HAZELNUT (CORYLUS COLURNA L.) WOOD Prof. Dr. Nusret AS1, Assoc. Prof. D. Sevim KORKUT2, Assoc. Prof.Ümit BÜYÜKSARI2 Department of Forest Product Engineering, İstanbul University Sarıyer /İstanbul / Turkey1 Department of Forest Product Engineering, Duzce University, Konuralp, Düzce, Turkey2 [email protected] Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine some of the physical and mechanical properties of Turkish hazelnut (CoryluscolurnaL.) wood.Hazelnut is an endemic species in Turkey and the trees used for the study were taken from the Pınarbaşı District of KastamonuProvince. As a resultof experiments carried out to evaluate the physical properties, it was found that the values of dry and air dry density were 0.636 gr/cm3 and 0.672 gr/cm3, radial, tangential and longitudinal swelling values were 4.60%, 7.48% and 0.41%, radial, tangential and longitudinal shrinkage values were 5.11%, 8.49% and 0.59%, respectively. According to the related standards, the mechanical properties ofbending strength (98.5 N/mm2), modulus of elasticity in bending (8273.4 N/mm2), compressive strength parallel to the grain (50.09 N/mm2), dynamic bending strength (impact strength)(0.71 kN/cm), tensile strength perpendicular to the grain (5.09 N/mm2), and hardness values of cross, radial and transverse sections (72.55 N/mm2, 47.32 N/mm2, 46.13 N/mm2, respectively) were also determined. Keywords: TURKISH HAZELNUT, CORYLUS COLURNA, MECHANICAL PROPERTIES, PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 1. Introduction Table 1: Study area data Area No.
    [Show full text]