Attacks and Their Detection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Attacks and Their Detection ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 7, ISSUE 12, 2020 A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF DENIAL OF SERVICE (INTERNET &NETWORK SERVICE) ATTACKS AND THEIR DETECTION Mohd Ubaid-Ur-Rahman 1, Dr.M.Srinivasan2 1Research Scholar, Dept. of Electronics And Communication Engineering,Sri Satya Sai University of Technology & Medical Sciences, Sehore, Bhopal-Indore Road, Madhya Pradesh, India 2Research Guide, Dept. of Electronics And Communication Engineering,Sri Satya Sai University of Technology & Medical Sciences, Sehore, Bhopal Indore Road, Madhya Pradesh, India Received: 14 March 2020 Revised and Accepted: 8 July 2020 ABSTRACT: This paper proposes a critical analysis of denial of service attacks and their detection. DoS attack is the well-known and high impact attack from distributed botnets configured by black hat hackers. The main goal of cyber security engineer today is to prevent the network devices from malicious attacks such as DoS, virus, malware, spyware and password attacks. In this paper we are going to analyse DoS attack and their detection using our implementation process. Our implementation consists of three different phases to analyse, detect and prevent the DoS attacks. In this paper we proposed a frontline software based DoS protection device to analyse and detect DoS attacks. In the first phase we will configure DoS security policy to prevent the DoS attack. In the second phase we will configure DoS profile to protect the web server from botnets. To implement and test the DoS attack detection method we have chosen Azure and AWS public clouds to get a virtual machine for testing. In Azure cloud we will configure windows machine for web server and firewall VM for DoS protection. Our firewall has inbuilt machine learning algorithm to detect the DoS attacks. In AWS cloud we will configure our test Kali Linux server to start DoS attacks such as ping of death, SYN flood and UDP flood. Based upon the threshold limits of connection per second (CPS) count DoS detection will be carried out by our firewall. KEYWORDS: DoS, Prevent, Attack, Firewall, Network, Service, Internet, Detection. I. INTRODUCTION A DoS or Denial-of-Service attack is an attack focusing on the accessibility of web applications. In contrast to different sorts of attacks, the essential objective of a DoS attack isn't to take data yet to back or remove a site. The attackers' inspirations are assorted, going from basic fun, to monetary benefit and philosophy (hacktivism). A denial of service attack produces high or moderate rate attack traffic debilitating figuring assets of an objective, subsequently preventing authentic clients from getting to the site. DoS attacks have advanced into the more unpredictable and modern "distributed denial of service" (DDoS) attacks. The greatest attack at any point recorded around then focused on code-facilitating service GitHub in 2018. We'll examine DDoS attacks in more prominent detail later in this article. Cradle flood attacks, an attack type in which a memory support flood can make a machine devour all accessible hard circle space, memory, or CPU time. This type of adventure often brings about lazy conduct, framework crashes, or different injurious worker practices, bringing about denial-of-service. 3632 ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 7, ISSUE 12, 2020 Figure 1 DoS Attack in Internet Sources Flood attacks, by soaking a focused on worker with a staggering measure of bundles, a malignant entertainer can oversaturate worker limit, bringing about denial-of-service. All together for most DoS flood attacks to be effective, the malignant entertainer must have more accessible transfer speed than the objective. Truly, DoS attacks commonly misused security vulnerabilities present in network, software and equipment structure. These attacks have gotten less predominant as DDoS attacks have a more noteworthy problematic capacity and are moderately simple to make given the accessible apparatuses. As a general rule, most DoS attacks can likewise be transformed into DDoS attacks. A couple of regular notable DoS attacks incorporate, Smurf attack a formerly misused DoS attack in which a vindictive entertainer uses the transmission address of weak network by sending spoofed bundles, bringing about the flooding of a focused on IP address. Ping flood this basic denial-of-service attack depends on overpowering an objective with ICMP (ping) bundles. By immersing an objective with a bigger number of pings than it can react to productively, denial-of-service can happen. This attack can likewise be utilized as a DDoS attack. Ping of Death often conflated with a ping flood attack, a ping of death attack includes sending a deformed parcel to a focused on machine, bringing about malicious conduct, for example, framework crashes. Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks speak to the subsequent stage in the advancement of DoS attacks as a method of disturbing the Internet. Cybercriminals started utilizing DDoS attacks around 2000. Here's the reason DDoS attacks have become the weapon of decision for disturbing networks, servers, and sites. The attacks utilize huge quantities of traded off computers, just as other electronic gadgets, for example, webcams and savvy TVs that make up the ever-expanding Internet of Things to compel the shutdown of the focused on site, worker or network. Security vulnerabilities in Internet-of-Things gadgets can make them available to cybercriminals trying to secretly and effectively dispatch DDoS attacks. Interestingly, a DoS attack for the most part utilizes a solitary PC and a solitary IP address to attack its objective, making it simpler to guard against. The site's landing page at that point springs up on your screen, and you can investigate the site. Your PC and the worker keep imparting as you click joins, place requests, and complete different business. In a DoS attack, a computer is fixed to send one "presentation" to a worker, yet hundreds or thousands. The worker which can't tell that the presentations are phony sends back its typical reaction, holding as long as a moment for each situation to hear an answer. At the point when it gets no answer, the worker closes down the association, and the computers executing the attack rehashes, sending another bunch of phony solicitations. DoS attacks generally influence associations and how they run in an associated world. For shoppers, the attacks ruin their capacity to get to services and data. 3633 ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 7, ISSUE 12, 2020 Figure 2 DoS Protection Attackers are principally propelled by: Cyber fighting Government approved DDoS attacks can be utilized to both handicapped person resistance sites and a foe nation's framework. Ideology alleged "hacktivists" use DDoS attacks as a methods for focusing on sites they can't help contradicting philosophically. Extortion Perpetrators use DDoS attacks, or the danger of DDoS attacks as a methods for coercing cash from their objectives. Boredom Cyber hoodlums, a.k.a., "content youngsters" use prewritten contents to dispatch DDoS attacks. The culprits of these attacks are ordinarily exhausted, would-be programmers searching for an adrenaline surge. Business quarrels Businesses can utilize DDoS attacks to deliberately bring down contender sites, e.g., to shield them from partaking in a noteworthy occasion, for example, Cyber Monday. II. LITERATURE REVIEW Y.S Kalai Van (2019): This paper presents a Distributed denial of Service attacks (DDoS) is one of the significant dangers in the digital network and it attacks the PCs flooded with the Users Data Gram bundle. These kinds of attacks causes’ serious issue in the network through smashing the framework with enormous volume of traffic to attack the person in question and make the casualty inactive in which not reacting the solicitations. To distinguish this DDOS attack conventional interruption detection framework isn't appropriate to deal with immense volume of information. Hadoop is an edge work which handles immense volume of information and is utilized to deal with the information to locate any malevolent action in the information. In this examination paper oddity detection method is executed in Map Reduce Algorithm which recognizes the unordinary example of information in the network traffic. To plan a proposed model, Map Reduce stage is utilized to hold the effective algorithm which distinguishes the (DDoS) attacks by sifting and arranging the network traffic and recognizes the bizarre example from the network. Improvised Map reduce algorithm is executed with Map Reduce functionalities at the phase of confirming the network IPS. This Proposed algorithm centres on the UDP flooding attack utilizing Anomaly based Intrusion detection framework method which distinguishes sort of example and stream of bundles in the hub is more than the limit and furthermore recognizes the source code causing UDP Flood Attack. Indraneel Sreeram (2019): This paper presents the internet network is generally defrauded to the Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attack, which is one that deliberately involves the figuring assets and data transmission so as to reject that services to expected clients. The attack situation is to flood the bundles 3634 ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 7, ISSUE 12, 2020 massively. On the off chance that the attack source is single, at that point the attack is alluded as denial of service (DOS) and on the off chance that attack is sourced from disparate servers, at that point it is alluded as DDOS. Longer than 10 years huge numbers of the specialists considered the detection and prevention of DDOS attack as exploration goal and prevailing to convey hardly any huge DDOS detection and prevention techniques. How quick and early detection of DDOS attack is done in streaming network exchanges is as yet a noteworthy exploration objective in present degree of internet use. Tragically the current benchmarking DDOS attack detection procedures are neglecting to legitimize the goal called "quick and early detection of DDOS attack". So as to this, in this paper we formulated a Bio-Inspired Anomaly based application layer DDoS attack (App-DDOS Attack) detection that is in the point of accomplishing quick and early detection.
Recommended publications
  • Many Slides Borrowed from Ben Zhao, Christo Wilson, & Others
    12. Network Attacks Blase Ur and David Cash (many slides borrowed from Ben Zhao, Christo Wilson, & others) February 7th, 2020 CMSC 23200 / 33250 Network threat model • Network scanning • Attacks on confidentiality (e.g., eavesdropping) • Attacks on integrity (e.g., spoofing, packet injection) • Attacks on availability (e.g., denial of service (DoS)) Scanning and observing networks Network Scanning: Ping • Essential, low-level network utility • Sends a “ping” ICMP message to a host on the internet $ ping 66.66.0.255 PING 66.66.0.255 (66.66.0.255) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 66.66.0.255: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=41.2 ms • Destination host is supposed to respond with a “pong” – Indicating that it can receive packets • By default, ping messages are 56 bytes long (+ some header bytes) – Maximum size 65535 bytes • What if you send a ping that is >65535 bytes long? Ping of Death • $ ping –s 65535 66.66.0.255 – Attack identified in 1997 – IPv6 version identified/fixed in 2013 Network Scanning: Traceroute • traceroute — hops between me and host – Sends repeated ICMP reqs w/ increasing TTL Port Scanning • What services are running on a server? Nmap • 5 seconds to scan a single machine!! SYN scan Only send SYN Responses: • SYN-ACK — port open • RST — port closed • Nothing — filtered (e.g., firewall) Port Scanning on Steroids • How do you speed up scans for all IPv4? – Don’t wait for responses; pipeline – Parallelize: divide & conquer IPv4 ranges – Randomize permutations w/o collisions • Result: the zmap tool – Scan all of IPv4 in 45mins (w/ GigE cxn) – IPv4 in 5 mins w/ 10GigE Eavesdropping Tools: Wireshark, tcpdump, Bro, … Steps: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • WHITE PAPER Distributed Denial of Service
    WHITE PAPER Distributed Denial of Service DDoS Attack Testing and Verification Solutions OVERVIEW “Xena recreates complex First seen around 2000, Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks are a serious traffic so client and server threat to businesses around the world. Attackers use multiple hosts to swamp targets with bogus traffic, paralyzing the network and potentially costing the victims millions of communicate in exactly dollars. There are many security systems for preventing DDoS attacks – and they all need to be thoroughly tested and verified prior to being activated. the same order as the Xena offers a complete test solution for DDoS mitigation and network security with captured traffic to ensure high-performance products and ample features. Going beyond generating DDoS traffic, Xena’s solutions can help companies test their security products and operators test realistic network scenarios networks and detect flaws, thereby ensuring business continuity and preserve business for the DUT”. integrity. WHITE PAPER Xena Networks – Global Price/Performance Leaders in Gigabit Ethernet Testing – www.xenanetworks.com Distributed Denial of Service DDoS Attack Testing and Verification Solutions Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3 DDOS Attacks and Business Disruption ........................................................................... 4 Understanding Different DDoS Attacks ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DNS Threats November, 2015
    DNS Threats November, 2015 This document contains brief descriptions of a number of potential DNS threats. Direct DNS amplification Direct DNS amplification attacks are aimed at congesting DNS server outbound bandwidth. They start by sending a large number of DNS queries, specially crafted so that they result in a very large response that can reach up to 70 times the size of the request. Since DNS relies on the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), the attacker can use a small volume of outbound traffic to cause the DNS server to generate a much larger volume, resulting in congestion of the DNS server’s upload and eventually a denial of service (DoS). Reflection Reflection attacks use a third-party DNS server (typically an open recursive name server) in the Internet to propagate a DoS or DDoS attack by sending queries to the recursive server. Recursive servers will process queries from any IP address, and they return responses. The attack spoofs the DNS queries it sends by including the victim’s IP address as the source IP in the query, so that the query has the victim’s server information rather than the attacker’s. So when the recursive name server receives the requests, it sends all the responses to the victim’s IP address. A high volume of such “reflected” traffic can bring down the victim’s site. Distributed reflection DoS Distributed reflection DoS (DrDoS) attacks combine reflection with amplification that significantly increases the size of the response to the initial queries—and the likelihood that the victim’s server will be overwhelmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Attacks Explained: Dos and Ddos
    CYBER ATTACKS EXPLAINED: DOS AND DDOS With this article, we begin a new series on the major kinds of cyber attacks that weaken the IT security infrastructure within organisations. With the rapid spread of Internet technologies and applications, the number of those seeking to break into systems is also increasing — usually to gain fame, money, or to damage the target’s reputation. The first to be covered in this series is the Denial of Service attack (DoS) and the distributed version (DDoS). We will learn how these attacks work technically, and discuss ways to stop them at the network entry point. The fundamental technique behind a DoS attack is to make the target system busy. In a computer server, when a network packet is being received, all components (right from the network interface card or NIC to the application running under the OS) are participating to ensure successful delivery of that packet. The NIC must monitor the Ethernet frames meant for it, align data and pass it to the network card driver, which then adds its own intelligence and passes it to the OS, which takes it to the application. Each component involved can exhibit some form of vulnerability, and DoS attacks are devised to exploit one or more of these, to penetrate into the system. Let’s now understand the basics of the TCP/IP protocol, which uses a handshake between the sender and receiver. Figure 1 shows how a healthy TCP handshake takes place, and how a SYN flood attack compares with it. Figure 1: A healthy TCP handshake When the sender wants to communicate, it sends a SYN packet with its own IP address as the source, and the receiver’s IP address as the destination.
    [Show full text]
  • (DOS) Testing Ixchariot
    TEST PLAN Denial of Service (DOS) Testing IxChariot www.ixiacom.com 915-6681-01, 2005 Contents Overview of Denial of Service functionality in IxChariot..................................3 A brief outline of the DoS attack types supported in IxChariot...................... 4 Test Case 1: Ping Attack on Oracle Traffic........................................................5 Test Case : VoIP and TCP SYN Attacks...........................................................8 Copyright © 2005 Ixia. All rights reserved. The information in this document is furnished for Ixia informational use only, is subject to change 6601 W. Agoura Road without notice, and should not be construed as a commitment by Ixia. Ixia assumes no Calabasas, CA 9130 responsibility or liability for any errors or Phone: (818) 871-1800 inaccuracies that may appear in this document. Ixia and the Ixia logo are trademarks of Ixia. All Fax: (818) 871-1805 other companies, product names, and logos are Email: [email protected] trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. Internet: www.ixiacom.com Copyright © Ixia, 005 Denial of Service (DOS) Testing: Sample Test Plans Denial of Service (DOS) Testing: Sample Test Plans Denial of Service (DoS) attacks are a reality for most organizations with connections to the public Internet. In order to protect yourselves from the potential hazards of network hackers and malicious coders, a set of devices and software- based tools such as DUTs, intrusion detection systems (IDS), remote access solutions (VPN) and sophisticated routers and L4-7 application switches have been developed to effectively block malicious traffic and protect the organization’s data and information infrastructure. Leveraging the advanced functionality of Ixia hardware, IxChariot is now capable of generating line-rate traffic that emulates common DoS attack types while at the same time generating and measuring the performance of application traffic (VoIP, Internet, enterprise) that is being sent over the network.
    [Show full text]
  • Dos Attack Prevention Using Rule-Based Sniffing Technique and Firewall in Cloud Computing
    125 E3S W eb of C onferences , 21004 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912521004 ICENIS 2019 DoS Attack Prevention Using Rule-Based Sniffing Technique and Firewall in Cloud Computing Kagiraneza Alexis Fidele1,2*, and Agus Hartanto2 1 Data Entry and Update Taxpayer’s Registry in Rwanda Revenue Authority (RRA) Kigali-Rwanda 2 Master of Information System, School of Postgraduate Studies Diponegoro University, Semarang – Indonesia Abstract. Nowadays, we are entering an era where the internet has become a necessary infrastructure and support that can be applied as a means of regular communication and data service. In these services, cloud- based on servers has an essential role as it can serve numerous types of devices that are interconnected with several protocols. Unfortunately, internet cloud servers become the main target of attacks such as Denial of Service (DoS), Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS). These attacks have illegal access that could interfere in service functions. Sniffing techniques are typically practiced by hackers and crackers to tap data that passes through the internet network. In this paper, sniffing technique aims to identify packets that are moving across the network. This technique will distinguish packet on the routers or bridges through a sniffer tool known as snort connected to a database containing the attack pattern. If the sniffing system encounters strange patterns and recognizes them as attacks, it will notify to the firewall to separate the attacker's original Internet Protocol (IP) address. Then, communication from the attacker's host to the target will be discontinued. Consequently, the identified attack activity will stop working, and the service will proceed to run.
    [Show full text]
  • ASF Series Ddos Mitigation Datasheet
    ASF Application DDoS Mitigation DATASEET ASF Series Application Security Firewall provides enterprise-grade application DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) mitigation solution, which helps defend critical business applications in the enterprise data center from DDoS attacks and other threats. Array Networks ASF Series employ the sophisticated 64-bit SpeedCore™ multi-core processing architecture, providing comprehensive and accurate DoS andDDoSattack detection and mitigation for business-critical applications. The ASF Series provide granularattack mitigation controland improve attack detectionaccuracy and minimize false positives with the traffic baseline learning feature, dynamic refreshingof defense profile based on the learned traffic baseline, and the client source verification function. Product Function Description Combination of Detection and Cleaning ASF Series provides a high-performance DDoS engine, which can accurately detect and identify Layer 3 to Layer 7 DDoS attacks and DoS attacks with the help of session tracking and source verification mechanisms. After detecting DDoS attacks, ASF Series will generate and execute automatic blacklist to quickly clean the malicious traffic in the mixed traffic for the defense objects. In addition, ASF Series allows attack detection and traffic cleaning to be deployed together or separately. Enterprise-grade DDoS Mitigation ASF Series provide Layer 3 to Layer 7 DDoS mitigation, capable of mitigating volumetric DDoS attacks, protocol-based DDoS attacks, and application layer attacks with latency of microseconds. ASF Series supports providing granular and unique DDoS mitigation for different applications using DDoS profiles. Once defense objects are created, automatic DDoS profiles will provide the default DDoS mitigation for them. The traffic baseline learning function then allows the appliance to learn the traffic baseline of the applications and thus dynamic refresh the defense parameters for the automatic profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Junos® OS Attack Detection and Prevention User Guide for Security Devices Copyright © 2021 Juniper Networks, Inc
    Junos® OS Attack Detection and Prevention User Guide for Security Devices Published 2021-09-22 ii Juniper Networks, Inc. 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA 408-745-2000 www.juniper.net Juniper Networks, the Juniper Networks logo, Juniper, and Junos are registered trademarks of Juniper Networks, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All other trademarks, service marks, registered marks, or registered service marks are the property of their respective owners. Juniper Networks assumes no responsibility for any inaccuracies in this document. Juniper Networks reserves the right to change, modify, transfer, or otherwise revise this publication without notice. Junos® OS Attack Detection and Prevention User Guide for Security Devices Copyright © 2021 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. The information in this document is current as of the date on the title page. YEAR 2000 NOTICE Juniper Networks hardware and software products are Year 2000 compliant. Junos OS has no known time-related limitations through the year 2038. However, the NTP application is known to have some difficulty in the year 2036. END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT The Juniper Networks product that is the subject of this technical documentation consists of (or is intended for use with) Juniper Networks software. Use of such software is subject to the terms and conditions of the End User License Agreement ("EULA") posted at https://support.juniper.net/support/eula/. By downloading, installing or using such software, you agree to the terms and conditions
    [Show full text]
  • Jnxjsscreenmontable
    jnxJsScreenMonTable The jnxJsScreenMonTable, whose object ID is {jjnxJsScreenObjects 1}, collects the screen attributes that monitor the various attacks to enable the Juniper Networks Security Firewall to provide deep inspection (DI) protection on each of the security device's physical interfaces. These attributes are listed in jnxJsLoadedCaCertTable. The screen options can be enabled at a security zone bounded to an interface or interfaces. When these options apply to traffic reaching the security device through interfaces (via a zone), they offer protection against a malicious information gathering probe or an attack to compromise, disable, or harm a network or network resources. Table 1: jnxJsScreenMonTable Object Object ID Description jnxJsScreenMonEntry jnxJsScreenMonTable The screen option monitoring statistics entry. Each entry is uniquely 1 identified by the zone name. The data is collected on a per zone basis. There can be multiple interfaces bound to a particular zone. Hence, the statistics are aggregated across the interfaces on a per zone basis. Sequence of parameters: ■ jnxJsScreenZoneName ■ jnxJsScreenNumOfIf ■ jnxJsScreenMonSynAttk ■ jnxJsScreenMonTearDrop ■ jnxJsScreenMonSrcRoute ■ jnxJsScreenMonPingDeath ■ jnxJsScreenMonAddrSpoof ■ jnxJsScreenMonLand ■ jnxJsScreenMonIcmpFlood ■ jnxJsScreenMonUdpFlood ■ jnxJsScreenMonWinnuke ■ jnxJsScreenMonPortScan ■ jnxJsScreenMonIpSweep ■ jnxJsScreenMonSynFrag ■ jnxJsScreenMonTcpNoFlag ■ jnxJsScreenMonIpUnknownProt ■ jnxJsScreenMonIpOptBad ■ jnxJsScreenMonIpOptRecRt—Record route option
    [Show full text]
  • Musings RIK FARROWOPINION
    Musings RIK FARROWOPINION Rik is the editor of ;login:. While I was at LISA ’11, I ran into an old friend, Paul Ebersman . Paul was one of [email protected] the first employees at UUNET, and every time I ran into Paul, usually at a USENIX conference, he would tell me how the UUNET office had grown onto another floor of a building . Eventually, UUNETs growth was taking over entire buildings . Paul would also tell me how fast the Internet was growing, with traffic doubling every few months . UUNET was the fastest-growing ISP in the 1990s [1] and was founded with help from USENIX . These days, Paul is working for a company (Infoblox) that makes server appliances, and his own focus is on IPv6 . Paul’s article about issues with making the transition to IPv6 appears in this issue . During our conversations at LISA, I asked Paul about security and IPv6, and Paul said, “It’s like 1994 all over again ”. What Paul meant was that back in the mid-’90s, organizations were beginning to use the Internet without having more than the vaguest notion of security . Also, most IPv4 software stacks were largely untested, leading to root compromises and various denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, such as the Ping of Death [2] . In many ways, as the momentum to enable IPv6 on Internet- facing Web sites rolls onward, we will be facing another moment where most people will not be familiar with the new security issues that come with using a new network protocol . Just the Same Some things won’t be any different: there are still 65535 TCP and 65535 UDP ports in IPv6, just as in IPv4 .
    [Show full text]
  • TCP/IP Security Topics
    CIT 480: Securing Computer Systems TCP/IP Security Topics 1. Internet Protocol (IP) 2. IP Spoofing and Other Vulnerabilities 3. ICMP 4. Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) 5. TCP Session Hijacking 6. UDP Internet Protocol (IP) Connectionless – Packets may be lost, reordered, – Each packet is transported corrupted, or duplicated independently from other IP packets packets – Encapsulate TCP and UDP Unreliable packets – Delivery on a best effort basis – Encapsulated into link-layer – No acknowledgments frames Data link frame IP packet TCP or UDP packet IP Addresses 32-bit integers that identify machine on net Dotted decimal notation: ii.jj.kk.ll DNS translates names to IP addresses 172 . 16 . 254 . 1 10101100 00010000 11111110 00000001 1 byte 32 bits = 4 bytes IPv6 addresses are 128-bit integers written like 2001:0db8:0000:0000:0000:ff00:0042:8329 Network Address Translation Uses public IP addr to represent private IP. – Translates source IP in outgoing packets. – Translates dest IP in incoming packets. – Router keeps table of translations. IP Address Geolocation • ISPs get blocks of IP addresses from ARIN. • ARIN database records where IP addresses are. • Application layer and time data may help reveal details. Check http://www.findmyip.org/ for your location. IP Header IP Routing A router bridges two or more networks – Operates at the network layer. – Maintains tables to forward packets to the appropriate network. – Forwarding decisions based solely on the destination address. Routing table – Maps ranges of IP addresses to LANs or other gateway routers. IP Routing Same IP address at each hop used to route data packet. New MAC address at each hop IP Vulnerabilities 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Run-Time Protocol Anomaly Detection and Verification
    TOWARDS RUN-TIME PROTOCOL ANOMALY DETECTION AND VERIFICATION InSeon Yoo and Ulrich Ultes-Nitsche Department of Computer Science, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musee 3, Fribourg, CH1700, Switzerland. Keywords: Run-time Protocol Verification, Protocol Anomaly Detection, SDL, EFSM/CEFSM Abstract: `How to verify incoming packets whether they follow standards or not?' and `How to detect protocol anomalies in real-time?', we seek to answer these questions. In order to solve these questions, we have designed a packet verifier with packet inspection and sanity check. In this work, we specify TCP transaction behaviours declaratively in a high-level language called Specification and Description Language (SDL). This specification will be then compiled into an inspection engine program for oberving packets. In addition, the SanityChecker covers protocol header anomalies. 1 INTRODUCTION 2 EXAMPLE CASES OF PROTOCOL ANOMALIES Protocols are created with specifications, known as RFCs, to dictate proper use and communication. An 2.1 Ping of Death anomaly is defined as something different, abnormal, peculiar, or not easily classified. Protocol anomaly Attackers sends a fragmented PING request that ex- refers to all exceptions related to protocol format and ceeds the maximum IP packet size(64KB), causing protocol behaviour with respect to common practice vulnerable systems to crash. The idea behind the Ping on the Internet and standard specifications. This in- of Death and similar attacks is that the user sends a cludes network and transport layer protocol anoma- packet that is malformed in such a way that the target lies in layer 3 and layer 4 and application layer proto- system will not know how to handle the packet.
    [Show full text]