DOCSLIB.ORG

Tobacco Industry Use of Flavourings to Promote Smokeless Tobacco Products

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tobacco Industry Use of Flavourings to Promote Smokeless Tobacco Products Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053212 on 9 November 2016. Downloaded from Tobacco industry use of flavourings to promote smokeless tobacco products Ganna Kostygina,1 Pamela M Ling1,2 1Center for Tobacco Control ABSTRACT engineer fruit-flavoured tobacco products. An ana- Research and Education, UCSF, Background While fruit, candy and alcohol lysis of candy and tobacco products found some San Francisco, California, USA. 2 characterising flavours are not allowed in cigarettes in tobacco products contained higher levels of flavour Division of General Internal 9 Medicine, Department of the USA, other flavoured tobacco products such as chemicals than candy. Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, smokeless tobacco (ST) continue to be sold. We The 2009 US Family Smoking Prevention and California, USA. investigated tobacco manufacturers’ use of flavoured Tobacco Control Act prohibited candy, fruit, additives in ST products, the target audience(s) for alcohol and spice characterising flavours in cigar- Correspondence to fl fl Dr Pamela M Ling, University avoured products, and marketing strategies promoting ettes, as avours make cigarettes easier to smoke 10–13 of California, San Francisco, products by emphasising their flavour. and increase youth appeal. ST was not Box 1390, 530 Parnassus Methods Qualitative analysis of internal tobacco included in this regulation. Additional research is Avenue, Suite 366, industry documents triangulated with data from national needed to better understand the role of flavours in San Francisco, CA94143-1390, USA; [email protected] newspaper articles, trade press and internet. smokeless products. We analysed previously secret Results Internally, flavoured products have been tobacco industry documents from RJ Reynolds Received 30 May 2016 consistently associated with young and inexperienced (RJR), Brown & Williamson (B&W), Philip Morris Accepted 7 September 2016 tobacco users. Internal studies confirmed that candy-like (PM), British American Tobacco, Lorillard, US sweeter milder flavours (eg, mint, fruit) could increase Smokeless Tobacco Company (USST, formerly US appeal to starters by evoking a perception of mildness, Tobacco Company) related to the development and blinding the strong tobacco taste and unpleasant mouth marketing of flavoured smokeless products (includ- feel; or by modifying nicotine delivery by affecting ing moist snuff, snus, loose leaf and chewing product pH. tobacco) in the USA to answer the following Discussion Similar to cigarettes, flavoured ST is likely research questions: How and why did tobacco man- to encourage novices to start using tobacco, and ufacturers use flavoured additives in ST products?; regulations limiting or eliminating flavours in cigarettes Who were the target audiences for flavoured ST copyright. should be extended to include flavoured ST products. products?; What was the function of flavours in ST, and how did the use of flavours affect ST patterns of use?; What marketing strategies were used to fl INTRODUCTION promote avoured ST brands? Flavour may be defined as the blend of taste and smell sensations Smokeless tobacco (ST) products include moist 14 snuff (including portion pouch products such as evoked by a substance in the mouth. For this study, we included any natural or artificial candy, snus), chewing tobacco, dry snuff, and loose leaf or http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ scrap. As cigarette sales in the USA continue to fruit, alcohol, herb (eg, menthol, wintergreen) and fl decline, sales of moist snuff (the most popular type spice avourings or substances added to tobacco to ‘ ’ of ST) increased by 65.6% between 2005 and alter or enhance its taste, including sweet or sugar fl 2011.1 The growth in ST sales may be due in part avouring. to flavoured products: sales of flavoured moist snuff products increased 72.1% between 2005 and METHODS 2011 and contributed to ∼60% of the growth in We searched tobacco industry document archives the moist snuff category overall.1 Currently, Skoal, from the University of California, San Francisco the most popular ST brand among youth, offers Truth Tobacco Documents Library, between – over 20 line extensions with flavourings.2 4 November 2010 and April 2011. The searches Flavoured products tend to contain lower levels of were repeated and extended between August 2011 on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected free nicotine and pH,35features of ‘starter’ pro- and August 2014. Initial search terms included ducts. Therefore, the abundance of flavoured pro- ‘flavour’, ‘flavour*’, ‘other tobacco products’, ‘fla- ducts raises concerns about youth initiation.6 voured smokeless’, ‘new users’, ‘starters’, ‘youth’, Research on the tobacco industry’s use of fla- etc. These searches yielded thousands of docu- vours in ST to attract new users is limited. Prior ments; those related to flavoured ST use among studies used previously secret tobacco industry youth and new users were selected. Searches were documents to determine whether tobacco manufac- focused using standard techniques.15 Further turers used flavours in cigarettes to promote initi- ‘snowball’ searches for contextual information were ation,7 how nicotine content in ‘starter’ smokeless conducted using product types, brand names, docu- brands was manipulated to appeal to novices,5 or ment locations, dates and reference (Bates) developed ST products to encourage initiation of numbers. The analysis was based on a collection of smokeless use among smokers.8 A recent study by 432 documents. We reviewed the documents, orga- To cite: Kostygina G, Brown et al9 found that the same flavour chemicals nised them chronologically and thematically, and Ling PM. Tob Control that are used in popular brands of candy, such as identified common themes. Information from – 2016;25:ii40 ii49. Jolly Rancher candies or Life Savers, are used to industry documents was triangulated with outside ii40 Kostygina G, Ling PM. Tob Control 2016;25:ii40–ii49. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053212 Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053212 on 9 November 2016. Downloaded from sources, including a review of brand websites between 2012 and greatest acceptance among 18–30 years old.86 87 The advertising 2013, materials archived at the Rutgers Trinkets and Trash stated it was “for you, fellows, just starting out”; and “mild and website, and a convenience sample of 12 news stories in trade flavourful…just right for new users”, “a great way to start going press and national newspapers. smokeless”.44 46 48 88 In addition to youth appeal, the key stra- tegic functions of flavourings in ST are summarised in table 2. RESULTS USST subsequently collaborated with Swedish Tobacco Early interest in flavoured smokeless tobacco products Company in the early 1970s using a joint company, United 50 51 89 90 Smokeless products with flavours such as peach, apple, honey- Scandia International, to develop a new mildly fla- dew, strawberry, pineapple, honeysuckle, champagne and prune voured product for ‘new users, mainly cigarette smokers, age 51 date back to the 1870s.16 In 1934, the first wintergreen- group 15–35’. The product was also packaged in ‘paper bags’/ 51 flavoured chewing tobacco product (Skoal moist snuff) was portions for easier use. The targeted groups for this product introduced by USST.17 18 In the 1960s, flavours became more included male and female smokers and “new users…mainly important as USST recognised that 58% of ST users were young consumers who have not made their choice between dif- 91 55 years of age or older, and aimed to revive the declining ferent ways of using nicotine…” In 1973–1974, USST 52 smokeless market by targeting young males.19 An article entitled launched this mint-flavoured product branded as ‘Good Luck’. The Puzzling, Irksome, Exciting Youth Market (1973) published The marketing campaign strategy emphasised innovation, con- in a USST internal/external magazine stated, “…youth is such a venience and promoted a sense of social belonging to address 24 91 big market that no business, geared to continuous growth—and psychological factors important to young consumers. what business isn’t?—can ignore it…How can you afford to Advertisements explained: “the pouch works like a tea bag; the 42 ignore a consumer segment, when it is multiplying flavour seeps out, but the tobacco stays in place in the mouth”. two-and-a-half times as fast as the rest of the population?”20 Free samples of Good Luck were distributed to encourage trial 92 Louis F Bantle, then vice president for marketing at USST, and conversion, and intended to serve as a ‘gradual introduc- 93 said in a 1968 marketing meeting: “We must sell the use of tion’ to USST’s ‘more traditional moist ST products’. tobacco in the mouth and appeal to young people…we hope to In 1979, Conwood tobacco company introduced, start a fad”.21 One strategy for attracting new customers was to wintergreen-flavoured Hawken, which reached more new users 54 conduct experimental studies to test new flavours—‘a vital sales than Happy Days, including some as young as 9 years old. In factor’,21 22 and research conducted for USST found that com- response, USST re-evaluated Happy Days and Good Luck munications stressing taste, flavour and freshness were ‘most flavour, packaging and even the brand names, which the successful in inviting trial’ of ST.23 company felt failed to project a masculine exciting image appealing to younger users.25 In 1983, USST launched ‘Skoal In addition, researchers at USST and at RJR tobacco company copyright. 89 (which produced smokeless products at the time) recognised Bandits’ targeted towards new users, mainly cigarette smokers. that flavours could increase appeal to initiates by helping Skoal Bandits was mint-flavoured and packed in single-portion decrease strong tobacco taste (or ‘bite’), unpleasant mouth feel pouches, and flavour was ‘one of the key concepts in this new (burning or irritation of the lip and gum) and decreasing saliva product’ to ease initiation and appeal to young adults seeking 55 56 59 60 94 flow resulting in the need to expectorate, nausea, and floating novelty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Economics of Tobacco in Egypt a New Analysis of Demand
    HNP DISCUSSION PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economics of Tobacco Control Paper No. 8 The Economics of Tobacco in Egypt About this series... A New Analysis of Demand This series is produced by the Health, Nutrition, and Population Family (HNP) of the World Bank’s Human Development Network. The papers in this series aim to provide a vehicle for publishing preliminary and unpolished results on HNP topics to encourage discussion and Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized debate. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. Citation and the use of material presented in this series should take into Heba Nassar account this provisional character. For free copies of papers in this series please contact the individual authors whose name appears on the paper. Enquiries about the series and submissions should be made directly to the Editor in Chief Alexander S. Preker ([email protected]) or HNP Advisory Service ([email protected], tel 202 473-2256, fax 202 522-3234). For more information, see also www.worldbank.org/hnppublications. The Economics of Tobacco Control sub-series is produced jointly with the Tobacco Free Initiative of the World Health Organization. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized manner to the World Health Organization or to the World Bank, their affiliated organizations or members of their Executive Boards or the countries they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Tobacco Market, Manufacturing of Cigarettes and the Market of Related Non-Tobacco Products
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 21 December 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 18068/12 Interinstitutional File: ADD 3 2012/0366 (COD) SAN 337 MI 850 FISC 206 CODEC 3117 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 20 December 2012 to: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No Cion doc.: SWD(2012) 452 final (Part 3) Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentat ion and sale of tobacco and related products (Text with EEA relevance) Delegations will find attached Commission document SWD(2012) 452 final (Part 3). ________________________ Encl.: SWD(2012) 452 final (Part 3) 18068/12 ADD 3 JS/ic 1 DG B 4B EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.12.2012 SWD(2012) 452 final Part 3 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products (Text with EEA relevance) {COM(2012) 788 final} {SWD(2012) 453 final} EN EN A.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE TOBACCO MARKET, MANUFACTURING OF CIGARETTES AND THE MARKET OF RELATED NON-TOBACCO PRODUCTS A.2.1. The tobacco market .................................................................................................. 1 A.2.1.1. Tobacco products .............................................................................................. 1 A.2.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sep 19 New Tobacco Products.Ppt
    9/20/13 New Products Old Tricks The Problem What’s the Problem with New Products? New tobacco products are designed to: – Draw in new and youth users – Keep smokers smoking – Circumvent regulations and taxation 1 9/20/13 Increased youth smokeless tobacco use TOLL OF OTHER TOBACCO USE National Youth Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco Use 1997 - 2011 2003-2009: -11.0% 2003-2011: -17.4% 2003-2009: -9.2% 2003-2011: -8.7% 2003-2009: +36.4% 2003-2011: +16.4% 2003-2009: +32.8% 2003-2011: +14.9% Source: CDC, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey. 2 9/20/13 Most popular snuff brands among 12-17 year olds 1999-2011 2011 Top 3 Most Popular Moist Snuff Brands among 12-17 year olds 1. Grizzly (Reynolds American, via American Snuff Company) 2. Skoal (Altria, via UST) 3. Copenhagen (Altria, via UST) Source: 2011 NSDUH Source: Analysis of NHSDA, NSDUH data Health Harms of Other Tobacco Use Smokeless Tobacco It [smokeless • Cancer, including oral cancer tobacco] is not a safe and pancreatic cancer substitute for smoking cigarettes. • Gum disease -- U.S. Surgeon General, 1986 • Nicotine addiction Cigar Use • Cancer of the oral cavity, larynx, esophagus and lung 3 9/20/13 Brand development, Acquisitions Over Time WHERE IS THE INDUSTRY HEADED? Companies under in 1989 ( ) 4 9/20/13 Companies under in 2013 (28.5% economic interest) Tobacco Brands in 2013 Non-Tobacco Products 5 9/20/13 Companies under RJR Nabisco in 1989 Companies under in 2013 (formerly Conwood Company) B&W no longer exists as a separate company.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Effects and Dependency Associated with Snuff Consumption
    Health effects and dependency associated with snuff consumption This is an excerpt from the full technical report, which is written in Norwegian. The excerpt provides the report’s main messages in English. N0. 06–2005 Systematic reviews Title Health effects and dependency associated with snuff consumption Norwegian title Virkninger av snusbruk Institution Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten) John-Arne Røttingen, Director Authors Inger Natvig Norderhaug, Research manager Erik Dybing, Hans Gilljam, Petter O. Lind, Karl Erik Lund, Jørg Mørland, Birgitta Stegmayr, Bjørn Hofmann, Ida-Kristin Ørjasæter Elvsaas ISBN 82-8121-051-6 ISSN 1503-9544 Report No. 6 – 2005 Project number 5-207 Type of report Systematic reviews No. of pages 133 Client The Norwegian Directorate of Health Subject heading Tobacco, Smokeless; Dependency (Psychology) (MeSH) Keywords Snuff Citation Norderhaug IN, Dybing E, Gilljam H, Lind P O., Lund KE, Mørland J, Stegmayr B, Hofmann B, Ørjasæter Elvsaas I-K. Health effects and dependency associated with snuff consumption. Report from Kunnskapssenteret no. 6−2005. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, 2005. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services summarizes and disseminates evidence concerning the effect of treatments, methods, and interventions in health services, in addition to monitoring health service quality. Our goal is to support good decision making in order to provide patients in Norway with the best possible care. The Centre is organized under The Norwegian Directorate for Health, but is scientifically and professionally independent. The Centre has no authority to develop health policy or responsibility to implement policies. We would like to thank all contributers for their expertise in this project.
    [Show full text]
  • BAT INTERNATIONAL FINANCE Plc
    BASE PROSPECTUS B.A.T. INTERNATIONAL FINANCE p.l.c. (incorporated with limited liability in England and Wales) BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO HOLDINGS (THE NETHERLANDS) B.V. (incorporated with limited liability in The Netherlands) B.A.T. NETHERLANDS FINANCE B.V. (incorporated with limited liability in The Netherlands) B.A.T CAPITAL CORPORATION (incorporated with limited liability in the State of Delaware, United States of America) £25,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO p.l.c. (incorporated with limited liability in England and Wales) and each of the Issuers (except where it is the relevant Issuer) On 6 July 1998, each of B.A.T. International Finance p.l.c. (“BATIF”), B.A.T Capital Corporation (“BATCAP”) and B.A.T Finance B.V. (“BATFIN”) entered into a Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the “Programme”) for the issue of Euro Medium Term Notes (the “Notes”). On 16 April 2003, British American Tobacco Holdings (The Netherlands) B.V. (“BATHTN”) acceded to the Programme as an issuer and, where relevant, a guarantor and BATFIN was removed as an issuer and a guarantor under the Programme. On 9 December 2011, BATCAP was removed as an issuer and a guarantor under the Programme. On 16 May 2014, B.A.T. Netherlands Finance B.V. (“BATNF”) acceded to the Programme as an issuer and, where relevant, a guarantor. On 31 May 2017, BATCAP acceded to the Programme as an issuer and, where relevant, a guarantor. BATIF, BATHTN, BATNF and BATCAP are each, in their capacities as issuers under the Programme, an “Issuer” and together referred to as the “Issuers”.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Use, Not Abuse
    Sacred Use, Not Abuse A Traditional Tobacco Booklet written for and by Native American Youth Funded by the Northern California Indian Development Council, Inc. Tobacco Use Prevention Education Grant from the CA Department of Education Contents Definition of Sacred 1 TUPE Pre-test 2 Traditional Use of Tobacco 3 Word Scramble 4 Secondhand smoke 5 Non Traditional Use 6 Elder Stories 7 Elder/Youth Photo 8 Recipe 9 More Secondhand smoke 10 Easy Maze (Non-smoker) 11 Hard Maze (Smoker) 12 Youth Artwork 13-14 Native Words for Tobacco 15 Money to Burn 16 Coyote the Trickster 17 Draw Own Anti-tobacco Ad 18 Youth Artwork 19-20 Health Benefits 21 Stressed 22 Things You Can Do 23 Invest Your Time 24 Before you Quit 25 The Four D’s 26 TUPE Post-test 27 TUPE Pledge 28 The Use Of Sacred Tobacco Is Our Tradition SACRED sa•cred (say-Kred) adj. 1. Dedicated to or set apart for worship. 2. Worthy of religious veneration. 3. Made or declared holy. 4. Dedicated or devoted exclusively to a single use, purpose, or person. 5. Worthy of respect; venerable. 6. Of or relating to religious objects, rites, or practices. Tribal Elders are dedicated to keeping tobacco sacred. Tobacco is offered to the creator of the earth, for our land, our fish, our acorns, our life. The creator gives us many gifts. These gifts must be respected and used in their proper way. Tobacco is a gift to be used in a sacred way with respect. Woven bag in which tobacco is carried home.
    [Show full text]
  • Altria Group, Inc. Annual Report
    ananan Altria Altria Altria Company Company Company an Altria Company ananan Altria Altria Altria Company Company Company | Inc. Altria Group, Report 2020 Annual an Altria Company From tobacco company To tobacco harm reduction company ananan Altria Altria Altria Company Company Company an Altria Company ananan Altria Altria Altria Company Company Company an Altria Company Altria Group, Inc. Altria Group, Inc. | 6601 W. Broad Street | Richmond, VA 23230-1723 | altria.com 2020 Annual Report Altria 2020 Annual Report | Andra Design Studio | Tuesday, February 2, 2021 9:00am Altria 2020 Annual Report | Andra Design Studio | Tuesday, February 2, 2021 9:00am Dear Fellow Shareholders March 11, 2021 Altria delivered outstanding results in 2020 and made steady progress toward our 10-Year Vision (Vision) despite the many challenges we faced. Our tobacco businesses were resilient and our employees rose to the challenge together to navigate the COVID-19 pandemic, political and social unrest, and an uncertain economic outlook. Altria’s full-year adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS) grew 3.6% driven primarily by strong performance of our tobacco businesses, and we increased our dividend for the 55th time in 51 years. Moving Beyond Smoking: Progress Toward Our 10-Year Vision Building on our long history of industry leadership, our Vision is to responsibly lead the transition of adult smokers to a non-combustible future. Altria is Moving Beyond Smoking and leading the way by taking actions to transition millions to potentially less harmful choices — a substantial opportunity for adult tobacco consumers 21+, Altria’s businesses, and society. To achieve our Vision, we are building a deep understanding of evolving adult tobacco consumer preferences, expanding awareness and availability of our non-combustible portfolio, and, when authorized by FDA, educating adult smokers about the benefits of switching to alternative products.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and High School Students — United States, 2019
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries / Vol. 68 / No. 12 December 6, 2019 Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and High School Students — United States, 2019 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Surveillance Summaries CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................2 Methods ....................................................................................................................2 Results .......................................................................................................................5 Discussion ................................................................................................................8 Limitations ...............................................................................................................9 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 10 References ............................................................................................................. 10 The MMWR series of publications is published by the Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027. Suggested citation: [Author names; first three, then et al., if more than six.] [Title]. MMWR Surveill Summ 2019;68(No. SS-#):[inclusive
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Native Adult Tobacco Survey Member List Version
    APPENDIX K: SURVEY (MEMBER LIST VERSION) |___|___|___|___| |___| |___|___| |___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|___| Year Interview Interviewer Survey Number Respondent ID Supervisor Alaska Native Adult Tobacco Survey Member List Version TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................. 2 2. General Health .......................................................................................... 5 3. Cigarette Use ............................................................................................ 5 4. Iqmik Use ............................................................................................... 14 5. Chewing Tobacco (Spit) .......................................................................... 23 6. Snuff or Dip Tobacco .............................................................................. 32 7. Secondhand Smoke Exposure ................................................................. 42 8. Risk Perception ...................................................................................... 44 9. Demographics......................................................................................... 48 10. User-Selected Items ............................................................................. 52 Public burden of this collection of information is estimated to average 40 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed,
    [Show full text]
  • Substantiation of Modified Risk Information 08082018
    R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY (RJRT) MODIFIED RISK TOBACCO PRODUCT APPLICATIONS Presented by: Deirdre Lawrence Kittner, PhD, MPH Deputy Director, Division of Population Health Science Office of Science Center for Tobacco Products U.S. Food and Drug Administration Disclaimer: This is not a formal dissemination of information by FDA and does not represent Agency position or policy. September 13-14, 2018 CENTER FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS DISCLAIMER The information in these materials does not represent agency position or policy. The information is being provided to TPSAC to aid in its evaluation of the issues and questions referred to the committee. This presentation contains information prepared by the FDA for the members of the TPSAC. The presentation describes assessments and/or conclusions and recommendations written by individual FDA reviewers. Such conclusions and recommendations do not necessarily represent the final position of the individual reviewers, nor do they necessarily represent the final position of the Review Division or Office. This presentation may not include all issues relevant to FDA’s decision on the applications and instead is intended to focus on issues identified by FDA for discussion by TPSAC. The FDA will not make its determination on the issues at hand until input from TPSAC and from the public comments has been considered and all FDA reviews have been finalized. FDA’s determination may be affected by issues not discussed at the TPSAC meeting. 1 September 13-14, 2018 TPSAC Meeting | RJRT Modified Risk Tobacco Product
    [Show full text]
  • What Do Y Tell Us About the Industry in Brazil?
    May 2007 – Phase I Report This publication is under embargo up to 31 May, 11 am (EST) HE TOBACCO INDUSTRY DOCUMENTS: WHAT DO THEY TELL US ABOUT THE INDUSTRY IN BRAZIL? T This work was commissioned by the Pan American Health Organization as part of a multi-phase project to analyze the tobacco industry and tobacco control in Brazil. This preliminary report represents Phase I of the project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • This report builds on a previously published Pan American Health Organization report and presents preliminary results of a multi-phase project to map out the roles of the tobacco industry and of the tobacco control movement in Brazil. • This initial phase was developed to document the strategies and operations of the tobacco industry in Brazil as it can be determined from the tobacco industry documents publicly available after the settlement of legal cases of 46 states and territories of the United States with the US- based tobacco companies. • Brazil is an important tobacco market: its large, young, population appeal to tobacco companies searching to expand and it has a large tobacco growing, manufacturing and export business. • Despite the role of tobacco in the Brazilian economy, Brazil has been a world leader in implementing a regulatory framework in which the tobacco 1 May 2007 – Phase I Report industry operates. Overall adult smoking prevalence seems to be in decline, but youth smoking remains high in certain areas of the country. • The main cigarette companies operating in the country are Souza Cruz, a subsidiary of British American Tobacco, with approximately 75% share of market; and Philip Morris Brazil, part of Philip Morris International, with approximately 15% of the market.
    [Show full text]
  • I. the Current Threat to U.S. Tobacco Farmers and Their Communities
    United States Department of Agriculture-Farm Service Agency I. The Current Threat to U.S. Tobacco Farmers and their Communities The problems facing tobacco farmers and All of these changes have had a their communities have reached an urgent stage disproportionately harsh impact on small family that requires a comprehensive solution. While farms. While there were 188,650 tobacco the demand for the two predominant kinds of farms in the United States in 1978, by 1997 American-grown tobacco leaf, flue-cured and there were only 89,700 (a decline of more than burley, has fluctuated in the past, it has recently 50 percent), and the number of larger tobacco experienced sharp, unprecedented declines farms (greater than 50 acres) increased by 128 because of a variety of long-term trends. From percent. The current crisis facing U.S. tobacco the 1997 to 2000 growing seasons, the quota growers has accelerated the loss of small family for flue-cured declined by more than 430 million farms and the consolidation of American pounds (farm sales weight), a drop of 45 tobacco farming into larger units. Despite their percent, while the quota for burley declined by best efforts many small and even middle-sized more than 450 million pounds or 65 percent. tobacco farmers simply can no longer make ends meet. Those most at risk are those While sales have declined, tobacco-farming already classified as economically costs have surged dramatically and the prices disadvantaged, which include a disproportionate received by farmers have risen only modestly. number of farms owned or operated by Today, tobacco farmers face additional cost minorities.
    [Show full text]